Managing sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is challenging and unpredictable. There are no internationally accepted recommendations. In light of the lack of global consensus and guidelines and the ongoing advancements in management options, a widely accepted treatment algorithm remains absent. This systematic review updates and evaluates the existing evidence on strategies for managing SIJ pain.

This study followed the guidelines defined in the 2020 PRISMA statement. All clinical studies concerning the clinical management of SIJ pain were considered. Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase were accessed in January 2025 without additional filters or temporal constraints. The risk of bias evaluation and statistical analysis followed the guidelines described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Fifteen randomised controlled trials, 13 clinical trials, and 10 retrospective studies were included. Data from 2666 patients (1429 women) were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 14.7 ± 15.2 months. The mean age was 54.0 ± 5.8 years, and the mean BMI was 28.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2. Non-surgical options primarily focus on physical therapy to relieve discomfort. Different medications aim to decrease inflammation and pain at the SIJ. Fluoroscopically guided SIJ injections allow for directly administering steroids or mesenchymal stem cells into the joint. Radiofrequency denervation is frequently used to address SIJ pain, while surgical fusion is usually reserved for cases where conservative treatment is ineffective.

Managing SIJ pain is challenging due to limited and inconsistent evidence. Treatment progresses from conservative options, physiotherapy, lifestyle changes, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to more invasive approaches like injections, radiofrequency denervation, and, in severe cases, surgical management. Research limitations include small sample sizes, short follow-ups, and inconsistent methodologies. Future high-quality studies are needed to establish clear diagnostic and treatment guidelines, compare techniques, and explore new therapies like regenerative medicine.

Study DesignRetrospective Cohort Study.ObjectiveTo identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.MethodsPatients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.Results549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; P < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; P < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; P < 0.001).ConclusionsThe highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.

This review evaluates the effectiveness of sacroiliac joint injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for treating low back and lower extremity pain. A systematic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of PRP and MSC injections on managing these conditions.

In recent years, several cell-based therapies, including the injection of MSCs and PRP into the sacroiliac joints, have been proposed for the management of low back pain. Emerging clinical evidence supporting their use appears promising. The present systematic review identified 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 3 observational studies that met inclusion criteria based on strict methodological quality and bias assessments. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework and qualitative analysis synthesis determined evidence levels as IV (limited) with a weak recommendation.

Our study aimed to compare the posterior interposition technique against the posterolateral transosseous technique in the same cadaver specimens.

Computer and cadaver models of 2 fixation techniques were developed. The computer model was constructed to analyze bone volume removed during implant placement and the bony surface area available for fusion. The cadaver model included quasi-static multidirectional bending flexibility and dynamic fatigue loading. Relative motions between the sacrum and ilium were measured intact, after joint destabilization, after fixation with direct-posterior and posterolateral techniques, and after 18,500 cycles of fatigue loading. Relative positions between each implant and the sacrum and ilium were measured after fixation and fatigue loading to ascertain the quality of the bone-implant interface. The 2 techniques were randomized to the left and right sacroiliac joints of the same cadavers.

The posterior interposition technique removed less bone volume and facilitated a larger surface area available for bony fusion. Posterior interposition significantly reduced the nutation/counternutation motion of the sacroiliac joint (42% ± 8%) and reduced it more than the posterolateral transosseous technique (14% ± 4%). Upon fatigue loading, the posterior interposition implant maintained the bone-implant interface across all specimens, while the posterolateral transosseous implant migrated or subsided in 20%-50% of specimens.

Posterior interposition fixation of the sacroiliac joint reduces joint motion. The amount of fixation from the posterior technique is superior and more durable than the amount of fixation achieved by the posterolateral technique.

Low back pain affects over 80 % of adults, with sacroiliac joint dysfunction accounting for 15-30 % of these cases. Sacroiliac fusion is a surgical procedure for refractory joint pain. While the biomechanics of the joint and its fusion relative to the spinal column are well-known, the hip-spine relationship post-fusion remains unclear. Understanding the biomechanical state following fusion can enhance patient recovery and optimize surgical outcomes. This study uses finite element analysis to assess hip joint biomechanics following sacroiliac joint fusion.

CTs of a 55-year-old male were used to create a biomechanical model, validated against a cadaveric study. Three triangular titanium alloy implants were placed across the sacroiliac joint in a unilateral and bilateral configuration. The model, loaded with pelvis and hip joint kinematics during a gait cycle, calculated joint reaction forces, contact stress and area on the hip joint across various gait phases.

Hip joint contact stresses varied with fixation configurations and gait phases. Unilateral right fusion reduced joint reaction forces by 2 % but increased contact stress by 3.7 %. Bilateral fusion increased joint reaction forces by 6.7 % and contact stress by 3.25 %, with higher stress during foot flat and heel off phases compared to unilateral fixation.

Fusion alters hip loading patterns during specific gait phases, with bilateral fusion producing the highest stresses during foot flat and heel off. These findings may suggest the need for fusion-specific rehabilitation protocols and warrants further investigation of long-term joint health outcomes.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction accounts for the etiology of pain in 15%-30% of low back pain cases. Some patients with conservative treatment-refractory SIJ dysfunction undergo radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the SIJ for prolonged pain relief. This procedure involves placing up to 12 RF probes in what is an invasive, resource-intensive, and time-consuming process. High-intensity focused ultrasound is an alternative neuroablative technique that is non-invasive and potentially less cumbersome. MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (MRgHIFU) had previously been successfully applied to SIJ ablation in a swine model, and more recently had been trialed in humans. However, ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (USgHIFU) of the SIJ may be a more practical and rapid alternative to MRIgHIFU.

This was a prospective technology efficacy and safety study in a swine model. Three Yorkshire pigs underwent bilateral SIJ ablation using a proprietary USgHIFU prototype. Post procedure, treatment efficacy was assessed using clinical evaluation of pain and changes in ambulation, gross inspection of lumbosacral necropsy and pathology sections, and histology.

Post anesthetic monitoring for 72 hours showed no signs of gait abnormalities or perceived pain in the swine models. Of the primary sacral spine targets, histological specimen review suggested successful lesioning of 37/54 sites (68.5%), specifically in the targeted areas that were visualized under ultrasound. Of the successful lesion zones, 22/37 (59.5%) included nerve lesions, 34/37 (91.9%) included muscle lesions, 34/37 (91.9%) included periosteum lesions, and 20/21 (95.2%) included bony lesions.

The preliminary study thus demonstrates that USgHIFU can create targeted contiguous strip lesions along the SIJ and lead to thermal necrosis of the posterior sacral network without causing additional neurological damage or damage to adjacent muscle tissue or bone outside of target areas.

Lumbosacral radiculopathy is a common disorder evaluated by the electrodiagnostic medicine (EDX) consultant. Making this task difficult is the abundance of radiculopathy mimics. Peripheral neurologic mimics are common, but musculoskeletal mimics are not rare and may be less familiar to many EDX consultants. Awareness of the most common musculoskeletal mimickers-particularly key historical and physical examination features that can distinguish them from radiculopathies-can lead to an accurate diagnosis for the patient and referring provider. Part 1 of this monograph covered theoretical issues surrounding why radiculopathy mimics occur. This second part reviews the most common musculoskeletal mimics, including facet arthropathy, myofascial pain syndrome, hip pathology, greater trochanteric pain syndrome, piriformis syndrome, sacroiliac joint dysfunction, hamstring pathology, iliotibial band syndrome, and plantar fasciitis. Diagnosis of these musculoskeletal mimickers is complicated by nonspecific physical examination and imaging findings, and diagnostic injections are frequently necessary to confirm the diagnosis. Treatment for most mimickers includes physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, guided injections, and other conservative measures, only rarely followed by surgical intervention. EDX consultants can efficiently incorporate a few high-yield maneuvers into their physical examination based on the location of the pain to provide answers to patients presenting with a musculoskeletal mimic of a lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Full-endoscopic sacroiliac joint denervation (FE-SJD) is a novel technique for the management of pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, clinical outcomes, and outcome predictors of uniportal full-endoscopic sacroiliac joint denervation.

From 2019 to 2021, a total of 47 consecutive patients with pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction underwent uniportal FE-SJD through posterior approach by a single fellowship-trained spine surgeon. A retrospective analysis of perioperative parameters, complications, and clinical outcomes were obtained prospectively.

The patient cohort had a mean age of 59.4 ± 14.0 years, with 63.8% females. Symptom duration averaged 62.1 ± 53.7 months. The mean operative time was 57.1 ± 16.8 minutes. All patients were discharged on the same day of surgery. Significant improvement was noted in preoperative visual analog score (back) and Oswestry Disability Index scores at 3, 6, 12 months, and 2 years ( P < .001). Thirty-four patients (72.3%) returned to normal functioning with an average of 82% pain relief and a satisfaction rate of 78.7% at a mean follow-up of 18.2 ± 13.1 months. There were no intraoperative complications. One patient had postoperative right L5 dysesthesia. Seven patients (14.9%) underwent contralateral FE-SJD due to satisfaction with the index procedure but residual pain on the contralateral side. Concomitant lumbar issues correlated with less functional improvement at 2 years ( P = .009).

The long-term clinical results of FE-SJD are favorable. Endoscopic denervation of the dorsal rami branches supplying the sacroiliac joint represents a safe, effective, and durable option to address pain secondary to sacroiliac joint dysfunction. A significant factor that influences outcomes is the presence of concomitant lumbar pathology. Further research is needed to compare this technique with current available treatment options.

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common source of chronic low back pain. Published cohorts have reported favorable outcomes after SIJ fusion. We report the 12-month follow-up from SIJ fusion of the so far largest single-center and single-surgeon group.

Over 15,000 outpatients were evaluated for chronic low back and leg pain, of whom 3,477 underwent SIJ blocks. 541 patients were stringently selected to undergo SIJ fusion with triangular titanium implants (TTI). 483 patients had a follow-up of 12 months. Patients were seen every 3 months and completed visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ratings.

Mean age of all patients was 61 years, and the majority (65%) were women. 44% had undergone prior lumbar fusion and 10% had a spinal cord stimulator (SCS) in place at the time of SIJ surgery. 26% underwent non-simultaneous bilateral SI joint fusion. At 12 months, the proportion of patients with clinically important improvements in pain (≥ 2 points) was very high (100%). The proportion with substantial improvement (≥ 4 points) was 98%. Similarly, improvement in ODI was high, with nearly 99% having an improvement of ≥ 15 points by month 12. The proportions of patients with VAS ≤ 2 or ODI ≤ 15 was also high (92.8% and 48.9%).

In our clinical practice, SIJ fusion with TTI produces significant improvement in pain and disability. The most important factor for achieving these clinical results may be the very stringent multistep selection of patients for surgery, which is described in detail, as well as the highly standardized and streamlined surgical procedure and the particular postoperative management.

Spinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists.

The present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain.

Surgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether multi-segment fusion or fusion-to-sacrum increases sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology compared with single-segment fusion or a non-fused sacrum.

This study included 116 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion and were followed up for 2 years. The patients were classified into single-segment fusion (n = 46) and multi-segment fusion (more than two levels, n = 70) groups and then reclassified into the non-fused sacrum (n = 68) and fusion-to-sacrum groups (n = 48). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate radiographic parameters, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate SIJ degeneration. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Baseline and postoperative values were compared using a paired sample t-test.

LBP VAS scores significantly differed at 6 months (single-segment fusion, 3.04±1.88; multi-segment fusion, 4.83±2.33; P < 0.001) and 2 years postoperatively (single-segment fusion, 3.3±2.2; multi-segment fusion, 4.78±2.59; P = 0.094). There was no significant difference in SIJ degeneration, as assessed by CT scan, between the 2 surgical groups: 14 (30%) and 19 (27%) patients in the single-segment and multi-segment (P = 0.701) fusion groups, respectively. The LBP VAS scale showed comparable differences at 1 (non-fused sacrum, 3±2.18; fusion-to-sacrum, 3.74±2.28; P = 0.090) and 2 years postoperatively (non-fused sacrum, 3.29±2.01; fusion-to-sacrum, 4.66±2.71; P = 0.095). CT scan revealed that 18 (26%) and 15 (31%) patients in the non-fused sacrum and fusion-to-sacrum groups, respectively, developed SIJ arthritis; however, there was no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.574).

SIJ degeneration occurs independent of the number of fused segments or sacrum involvement.

Patients frequently complain of low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain (SIP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients with SIP would display different pelvic incidence (PI) values between standing and relaxed sitting positions, indicative of increased motion in the sacroiliac joints.

In this retrospective case-control study, 94 patients who underwent unilateral THA and experienced SIP were compared with 94 control patients without SIP. SIP was confirmed through clinical tests and investigated using biplanar imaging in both standing and sitting positions. The key parameters analyzed included PI, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and limb length discrepancy (LLD).

Patients without SIP showed a mean difference in PI of -1.5° (-8°-5°) between standing-to-sitting positions, whereas those with SIP showed a difference of -3.3° (-12°-0°)(P < 0.0001), indicating more motion in the sacroiliac joint during daily activities in the latter group. Patients with SIP showed smaller change in LL between standing-to-sitting positions (mean:6.3°; range:-8°-27°) compared with those without SIP (mean:9.5°; range:-12°-28°)(P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in functional leg length between patients with (mean:7 mm; range:0-12 mm) and without SIP (mean:7 mm; range:0-11 mm)(P = 0.973).

This study revealed significant sacroiliac joint motion in patients with SIP post-THA, as indicated by PI changes, increased posterior pelvic tilt, and reduced change in the LL. Contrary to common belief, SIP did not correlate with LLD.

Systematic review of the literature and subsequent meta-analysis for the development of a new guideline.

This manuscript summarizes the recommendations from a new clinical guideline published by the German Spine Society. It covers the current evidence on recommendations regarding the indication, test blocks and use of radiofrequency denervation. The guidelines aim is to improve patient care and efficiency of the procedure.

A multidisciplinary working group formulated recommendations based on the Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument.

20 clinical questions were defined for guideline development, with 87.5% consensus achieved by committee members for one recommendation and 100% consensus for all other topics. Specific questions that were addressed included clinical history, examination and imaging, conservative treatment before injections, diagnostic blocks, the injected medications, the cut-off value in pain-reduction for a diagnostic block as well as the number of blocks, image guidance, the cannula trajectories, the lesion size, stimulation, repeat radiofrequency denervation, sedation, cessation or continuation of anticoagulants, the influence of metal hardware, and ways to mitigate complications.

Radiofrequency (RF) denervation of the spine and the SI joint may provide benefit to well-selected individuals. The recommendations of this guideline are based on very low to moderate quality of evidence as well as professional consensus. The guideline working groups recommend that research efforts in relation to all aspects of management of facet joint pain and SI joint pain should be intensified.

Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction is a common cause of lower back pain. The diagnosis of SI joint pain remains challenging. Sacroiliac joint injection remains the gold standard of diagnosis of SI joint pain as well as providing therapeutic effect. One complication related to SI joint injection is temporary numbness and weakness of the leg.

To evaluate the anatomy of the SI joint and the flow of the contrast in the sacroiliac joint and to understand how local anesthetic can affect the nerve roots and cause temporary weakness and numbness of the leg. Study Design. Retrospective case series. Setting. Academic medical center.

Patients who underwent SI joint injection with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography with fluoroscopy (3D-CBCT) imaging were identified through retrospective review of two providers' case log from the electronic medical record. The cone beam CT images were reviewed to study the contrast spread and flow in the SI joint.

27/32 patients with the mean age of 56 years (range 39-87 years), 20 females, and 7 males were included in this study. After reviewing cone beam CT images, 4/27 (14.8%) patients showed contrast spread in the SI joint and spread into the S1 posterior neuroforamen. The remainder 23/27 (85.2%) patients had contrast localized in the SI joint. Limitations. Small population size, retrospective review of medical records.

Our results indicate that the injection of lower concentration of local anesthetic with less volume may be necessary to decrease the risk of S1 nerve root block and epidural block. Furthermore, to improve the specificity of a diagnostic SI injection, an appropriate evaluation should be considered to rule out any S1 nerve pathology as a significant pain generator.

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ), a synovial joint with irregular surfaces, is crucial for stabilizing the body and facilitating daily activities. However, recent studies have reported that 15-30% of lower back pain can be attributed to instability in the SIJ, a condition collectively referred to as sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD). The aim of this study is to investigate how the morphological characteristics of the auricular surface may influence the SIJ range of motion (ROM) and to examine differences in SIJ ROM between females and males, thereby contributing to the enhancement of SIJD diagnosis and treatment.

We measured SIJ ROM using motion-analysis cameras in 24 fresh cadavers of Korean adults (13 males and 11 females). Using three-dimensional renderings of the measured auricular surface, we investigated the correlations between the morphological characteristics of the auricular surface and the ROM of the SIJ.

The SIJ ROM was between 0.2° and 6.7° and was significantly greater in females (3.58° ± 1.49) compared with males (1.38° ± 1.00). Dividing the participants into high-motion (3.87° ± 1.19) and low-motion (1.13° ± 0.62) groups based on the mean ROM (2.39°) showed no significant differences in any measurements. Additionally, bone defects around the SIJ were identified using computed tomography of the high-motion group. In the low-motion group, calcification between auricular surfaces and bone bridges was observed.

This suggests that the SIJ ROM is influenced more by the anatomical structures around the SIJ than by the morphological characteristics of the auricular surface.

The optimal configuration for spinopelvic fixation during multilevel spine fusion surgery for adult spine deformity remains unclear. Postoperative sacroiliac (SI) joint pain, S2AI screw loosening and implant breakage could be related to continued motion of the SI joint with use of only a single point of fixation across the SI joint.

Prospective, international, multicenter randomized controlled trial of 222 patients with adult spine deformity scheduled for multilevel (4 or more levels) spine fusion surgery with pelvic fixation. Subjects were randomized to sacroalar (S2) iliac (S2AI) screws alone for pelvic fixation or S2AI + triangular titanium implants placed cephalad to S2AI screws. Quad rod techniques were not allowed or used. Baseline spinal deformity measures were read by an independent radiologist. Site-reported perioperative adverse events were reviewed by a clinical events committee. Quality of life questionnaires and other clinical outcomes are in process with planned 2-year follow-up.

One hundred thirteen participants were assigned to S2AI and 109 to S2AI + titanium triangular implants (TTI). 35/222 (16%) of all subjects had a history of SI joint pain or were diagnosed with SI joint pain during preoperative workup. Three-month follow-up was available in all but 4 subjects. TTI placement was successful in 106 of 109 (98%) subjects assigned to TTI. In 2 cases, TTI could not be placed due to anatomical considerations. Three TTI ventral iliac breaches were observed, all of which were managed non-surgically. One TTI subject had a transverse sacral fracture and 1 TTI subject had malposition of the implant requiring removal.

SI joint pain is common in patients with adult spinal deformity who are candidates for multilevel spine fusion surgery. Concurrent placement of TTI parallel to S2AI screws during multilevel spine fusion surgery is feasible and safe. Further follow-up will help to determine the clinical value of this approach to augment pelvic fixation.

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is one of the most common causes of low back pain. The aim of our study was to determine whether combined injection (intra and periarticular) of sacroiliac joint provides greater pain relief than intra-articular injection.

This is a randomized controlled trial between two groups. The first group involved thirty patients treated with combined injection (intra- and periarticular) of a mixture of methylprednisolone acetate 40 mg and local anesthetic into a symptomatic sacroiliac joint. The second group (30 patients) received the same mixture only intra-articular. Diagnostic block was done for all cases. All patients failed to respond to medical treatment before proceeding to the injection procedure.

Over 6 months of follow-up, there were statistically significant improvements in patients who received combined sacroiliac joint injection according to pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) compared with intra-articular group. Comparing both groups, there was significant difference in the 1-month VAS (one month after the procedure) as the P value was 0.010, and in the 6-month VAS (6 months after the procedure) as the P value was 0.007. There was no significant difference in the pre-VAS (P value was 0.795) and immediate post-VAS (one week after the procedure) as the P value were 0.145. No complications were reported after the procedure.

Although both groups provide statistically significant pain relief, patients who received combined sacroiliac joint injection have significantly greater clinical improvement as regard to those who received only intra-articular injection.

In recent years, researchers have delved into the relationship between the anatomy and biomechanics of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain and dysfunction in endurance runners to elucidate the connection between lower back pain and the SIJ. However, the majority of SIJ pain and dysfunction cases are diagnosed and managed through a traditional athlete-clinician arrangement, where the athlete must attend regular in-person clinical appointments with various allied health professionals. Wearable sensors (wearables) are increasingly serving as a clinical diagnostic tool to monitor an athlete's day-to-day activities remotely, thus eliminating the necessity for in-person appointments. Nevertheless, the extent to which wearables are used in a remote setting to manage SIJ dysfunction in endurance runners remains uncertain.

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the literature to enhance our understanding regarding the use of wearables in both in-person and remote settings for biomechanical-based rehabilitation in SIJ dysfunction among endurance runners. In addressing this issue, the overarching goal was to explore how wearables can contribute to the clinical diagnosis (before, during, and after) of SIJ dysfunction.

Three online databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, were searched using various combinations of keywords. Initially, a total of 4097 articles were identified. After removing duplicates and screening articles based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 articles were analyzed. Subsequently, 21 articles were included in this study. The quality of the investigation was assessed using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews.

Among the 21 studies included in this review, more than half of the investigations were literature reviews focusing on wearable sensors in the diagnosis and treatment of SIJ pain, wearable movement sensors for rehabilitation, or a combination of both for SIJ gait analysis in an intelligent health care setting. As many as 4 (19%) studies were case reports, and only 1 study could be classified as fully experimental. One paper was classified as being at the "pre" stage of SIJ dysfunction, while 6 (29%) were identified as being at the "at" stage of classification. Significantly fewer studies attempted to capture or classify actual SIJ injuries, and no study directly addressed the injury recovery stage.

SIJ dysfunction remains underdiagnosed and undertreated in endurance runners. Moreover, there is a lack of clear diagnostic or treatment pathways using wearables remotely, despite the availability of validated technology. Further research of higher quality is recommended to investigate SIJ dysfunction in endurance runners and explore the use of wearables for rehabilitation in remote settings.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion, to treat back pain caused by SIJ dysfunction, can employ open or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques and either cylindrical (screw-shaped) or triangular (wedge-shaped) implants. Fusion nonunion sometimes explains recurrent SIJ pain following fusion and occasionally requires hardware revision. MIS revision minimizes patient pain, infection, and disability, but due to the triangular implant size and form factor, implant removal can present challenges for MIS access during the explantation and achieving good bony purchase for reinstrumentation. Here, we report a prone single-position lateral MIS/posterior mini-open procedure for triangular-implant SIJ fusion revision.

The patient is a 72-year-old female who underwent right SIJ fusion for lower back and leg pain sustained after a fall 2 years prior but experienced recurrent pain over the subsequent 2 years, with imaging findings of right SIJ peri-hardware lucencies and diagnostic injections confirming persistent right-sided sacroiliitis.

The patient underwent hardware removal using the lateral MIS incision with table-mounted tubular access and image-guided navigation to maintain exposure, plus simultaneous reinstrumentation using a navigated S2-alar-iliac screw and iliac bolt construct with connecting rod through the posterior mini-open incision made for the navigation reference frame spinous process clamp.

The use of navigation and MIS access can significantly decrease the complexity of lateral hardware removal, and mini-open navigated screw-and-rod constructs offer reinstrumentation options accessible to surgeons unfamiliar with specialized posterior SIJ systems.

Retrospective cohort analysis.

To assess the evolution of patients undergoing sacroiliac (SI) fusion with minimally invasive surgery (MIS) relative to open approaches.

The SI joint can be a contributor to lumbopelvic symptoms. The MIS approach to SI fusion has been shown to have fewer complications compared with the open approach. Recent trends and evolved patient populations have not been well-characterized.

Data were abstracted from the large, national, multi-insurance, administrative 2015-2020 M151 PearlDiver database. The incidence, trends, and patient characteristics of MIS, as well as open, SI fusions for adult patients with degenerative indications, were determined. Univariable and multivariable analyses were then performed to compare the MIS relative to open populations. The primary outcome was to assess the trends of MIS and open approaches for SI fusions.

In total, 11,217 SI fusions were identified (of which 81.7% were MIS), with a clear increase in numbers over the years from 2015 (n=1318, 62.3% of which were MIS) to 2020 (n=3214 86.6% of which were MIS). Independent predictors of MIS (as opposed to open) SI fusion included: older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.09 per decade increase), higher Elixhauser-Comorbidity Index (OR 1.04 per two-point increase), and geographic region (relative to South, Northeast OR 1.20 and West OR 1.64). As might be expected, 90-day adverse events were lower for MIS than open cases (OR 0.73).

The presented data quantify the increasing incidence of SI fusions over the years, with the increase being driven by MIS cases. This was largely related to an expanded population (those who are older and with greater comorbidity), fitting the definition of disruptive technology with lesser adverse events than open procedures. Nonetheless, geographic variation highlights the differential adoption of this technology.

Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is defined as pain localized in the anatomical region of the SI joint. The reported prevalence of SI joint pain among patients with mechanical low back pain varies between 15% and 30%.

In this narrative review, the literature on the diagnosis and treatment of SI joint pain was updated and summarized.

Patient's history provides clues on the source of pain. The specificity and sensitivity of provocative maneuvers are relatively high when three or more tests are positive, though recent studies have questioned the predictive value of single or even batteries of provocative tests. Medical imaging is indicated only to rule out red flags for potentially serious conditions. The diagnostic value of SI joint infiltration with local anesthetic remains controversial due to the potential for false-positive and false-negative results. Treatment of SI joint pain ideally consists of a multidisciplinary approach that includes conservative measures as first-line therapies (eg, pharmacological treatment, cognitive-behavioral therapy, manual medicine, exercise therapy and rehabilitation treatment, and if necessary, psychological support). Intra- and extra-articular corticosteroid injections have been documented to produce pain relief for over 3 months in some people. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the L5 dorsal ramus and S1-3 (or 4) lateral branches has been shown to be efficacious in numerous studies, with extensive lesioning strategies (eg, cooled RFA) demonstrating the strongest evidence. The reported rate of complications for SI joint treatments is low.

SI joint pain should ideally be managed in a multidisciplinary and multimodal manner. When conservative treatment fails, corticosteroid injections and radiofrequency treatment can be considered.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain commonly affects patients with low back pain and can arise from traumatic and degenerative causes. However, the incidence of SIJ pain following lumbar fractures is not well understood.

TriNetX, a national network of deidentified patient records, was retrospectively queried. The lumbar fracture cohort included 239,199 adults, while the no lumbar fracture group included 6,975,046 adults. Following a propensity-score match based on demographics and risk factors for SIJ, there were 239,197 patients in each cohort. The incidence of SIJ pain and clinical outcomes were analyzed from 1 day to 1 year following the index event. Moreover, the location and type of single-level lumbar fractures were reported. The incidence of SIJ pain for single-level fractures was compared using a χ2 goodness-of-fit.

The lumbar fracture cohort was more likely to develop SIJ pain at 3 months (odds ratio [OR]: 5.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8-5.9), 6 months (OR: 4.4, 95% CI: 4.1-4.8), and 1 year (OR: 3.9, 95% CI: 3.6-4.2) postfracture. Among single-level lumbar fractures, the incidence of SIJ pain at 1 month (P = 0.005), 6 months (P = 0.010), and 1 year (P = 0.003) varied significantly, with the highest incidence in the L5 cohort.

Our findings suggest that lumbar fractures are a risk factor for developing SIJ pain. Moreover, the incidence of SIJ pain is greater following an L5 fracture than an L1 fracture. Further investigation is warranted to determine how the type and treatment of lumbar fractures affects the incidence of SIJ pain.

This study is designed to compare the extent of sacroiliac joint (SIJ) degeneration at total hip arthroplasty (THA) for two pathologies: osteoarthritis of the hip (OA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ON). We also assessed the prevalence of SIJ degeneration in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis. A total of 138 hips from 138 patients (69 OA and 69 ON) were assessed in this study, including 66 hips affected by OA secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. The degenerative changes in the SIJ and lumbar spine were evaluated prior to THA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scans, showing 9 instances of spondylolisthesis and 38 of degenerative scoliosis. The OA group exhibited longer duration from onset to surgery than the ON group. The OA group also included more cases with significant pelvic obliquity (3 degrees or more) and with significant increases in SIJ sclerosis and irregularities. Patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis or degenerative scoliosis were significantly more likely to have SIJ irregularities. The prevalence of SIJ degeneration was higher in cases of THA for OA than for ON. This study also suggests the possibility of Hip-SIJ-Spine syndrome in THA patients with OA.

To report the development of a new sacroiliac joint (SIJ) arthrodesis system that can be used for isolated fusion of the SIJ and, unlike known implant systems, in combination with lumbar instrumentation or as an alternative to existing sacropelvic fixation (SPF) methods, and the patient-reported outcomes in two cases.

After a comprehensive review of 207 pelvic computed tomography (CT) datasets, an implant body was designed. Its shape was modeled based on the SIJ recess. A screw anchored in the ilium secures the position of the implant and allows connection to lumbar instrumentation. Two patients with confirmed SIJ syndrome underwent surgery with the anatomically adapted implant. They were evaluated preoperatively, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Million Visual Analogue Scale (MVAS), Roland Morris Score (RMS), reduction of SIJ/leg pain, and work status were assessed. Bony fusion of the SIJ was evaluated by radiographs and CT 12 months after the procedure.

Analysis of pelvic CT data revealed a wedge-shaped implant body in four different sizes. In the two patients, VAS decreased from 88 to 33 points, ODI improved from 67 to 35%, MVAS decreased from 80 to 36%, and RMS decreased from 18 to 9 points 12 months after surgery. SIJ pain reduction was 80% and 90%, respectively. Follow-up CT and radiographs showed solid bony integration.

The implant used takes into account the unique anatomy of the SIJ and also meets the requirements of a true arthrodesis. Initial results in two patients are promising. Biomechanical and clinical studies will have to show whether the considerable theoretical advantages of the new implant system over existing SIJ implants - in particular the possibility of connection to a lumbar stabilization system - and SPFs can be put into practice.

The sacroiliac (SI) joint is recognized as a source of low back pain in 15-30% of patients. Though randomized controlled trials have shown clinical improvement following SI joint fusion in 83.1% of patients, revision rates of 2.9% within 2 years have been reported. There is a paucity of literature reviewing this small yet significant population of patients requiring revision surgery.

Following IRB approval, retrospective review of patients, who underwent a revision SI joint fusion from 2009 to 2021 was completed. Patient-reported outcomes were measured before and at each clinic visit after surgery with visual analoge scale (VAS) for back pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Patient characteristics (chronic opiate use and prior lumbar fusion) and surgical factors (operative approach, type/number of implants and use of bone graft) were recorded. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated with Paired t and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression determined if patients met the minimally clinical important differences (MCID) for VAS-back pain and ODI scores at 1 year.

Fifty-two patients (77% female) with an average age of 49.1 (SD ± 11.1) years met inclusion criteria. Forty-four had single sided revisions and eight bilateral revisions. At 1 year follow-up there was no significant improvement in VAS-Back (p = 0.06) or ODI (p = 0.06). Patients with chronic opioid use were 8.5 times less likely to achieve the MDC for ODI scores (OR 0.118, p = 0.029). There was no difference in outcomes when comparing the different surgical approaches (p = 0.41).

Our study demonstrates patients undergoing revision surgery have moderate improvement in low back pain, however, few have complete resolution of their symptoms. Specific patient factors, such as chronic opiate use and female sex may decrease the expected improvement in patient-reported outcomes following surgery. Failure to obtain relief may be due to incorrect indications, lack of biologic fusion and/or presence of co-pathologies. Further clinical examination and consistent long-term follow-up, clarify the role revision surgery plays in long-term patient outcomes.

» The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a common cause of low back pain and should be included in the differential diagnosis.» Nonoperative treatment of sacroiliac pain is always the first line of therapy; however, when it is unsuccessful and becomes chronic, then recurrent nonoperative treatment becomes expensive.» Surgical treatment is cost-effective in appropriately selected patients. High-quality clinical trials have demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement compared with nonsurgical management in appropriately selected patients.» Spinal fusion to the sacrum increases degeneration of the SIJ and frequency of SIJ pain.

Introduction Low back pain (LBP) is a major contributor to decreases in the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults. Paralumbar spine disease (PLSD) is a common cause of LBP. We aimed to investigate the causes of LBP, including PLSD, among older adults. Methods Among 744 consecutive patients with LBP, 75 patients (10.1%) aged >80 years (25 males and 50 females) were included. The average patient age was 83.9 years. All patients were evaluated using lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiography to diagnose the causes of LBP. PLSD was diagnosed based on clinical symptoms, palpation, and the effects of the block. Results Eleven patients (11/75, 14.7%) had acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Twenty-eight of the remaining 64 patients exhibited decreased LBP with oral medication, and six (6/75, 8.0%) exhibited lumbar spinal canal stenosis on MRI. PLSD was suspected in 19 of the remaining 30 cases based on clinical symptoms and palpation. Blocks were effective in 16 patients with PLSD, which involved superior cluneal nerve entrapment (SCN-E) in eight patients (10.7%), middle cluneal nerve entrapment (MCN-E) in nine patients (12.0%), sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain in five patients (6.7%), and gluteus medius muscle (GMeM) pain in three patients (4.0%). The average numerical rating scale (NRS) scores for pain changed from 7.5 ± 1.5 before treatment to 1.3 ± 0.9 at discharge (p < 0.05). Conclusion Osteoporotic acute vertebral fracture (14.7%) was identified as the cause of LBP in older adults. Block therapy for PLSD may aid in the diagnosis and treatment of non-specific LBP.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain leads to abnormal joint loading, and is a key risk factor for joint degeneration. This study aimed to determine the effect of tendon-bone-setting on postpartum women with SIJ pain. Multicenter retrospective review of medical records and electroencephalography reports in 10 academic medical centers. 328 postpartum women with sacroiliac joint pain were divided into 2 groups according to the methods of therapy. Group (A) (n = 203) received acupuncture combined with tendon-bone-setting for twenty days, whereas group (B) (n = 125) received only the same acupuncture for twenty days. The outcome measures were the mean values of numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), present pain intensity (PPI) scale, visual analog scale (VAS) and Japanese orthopedic association (JOA) score to evaluate pain intensity, oswestry disability index (ODI), quebec back pain disability scale (QBPDS), active straight leg raise (ASLR) and back pain function scale (BPFS) to evaluate the functional disability, pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at 5 chosen points in the sacroiliac joint region to assess pain sensitivity. All of them were evaluated before and after treatment. The effectiveness from short to long term, as well as safety was assessed in this study. A comparison of the 2 groups after treatment showed statistically significant increases in the mean values of BPFS, JOA and PPT at the 5 chosen points (P < .05), as well as significant reductions in the scores of QBPDS, ODI, ASLR, NPRS, VAS and PPI (P < .05) in favor of group (B). In addition, after treatment for 2 weeks, the considered effective rate in the group (A) was significantly higher than that in the group (B) (P < .05). Also, the cumulative incidence of pain relief at 24 months in the group (A) was greater compared with the group (B) as determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis (P < .05). Interestingly, none serious adverse event for the participants was reported. Tendon-Bone-Setting is effective and safe in treating sacroiliac joint pain for the postpartum women patients in the short and long terms through decreasing pain sensitivity and intensity, as well as improving functional ability.

Pain in the sacroiliac joint may be caused by abnormal joint motion. Diagnosis is mainly based on clinical tests. The aims of this study were to examine whether low-dose computed tomography with provocation of the hip could detect sacroiliac joint motion, and to study whether provocation of the hip results in greater sacroiliac joint motion in the ipsilateral than in the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

12 patients with sacroiliac joint pain were examined with low-dose computed tomography scans of the sacroiliac joint, one with the hips in the neutral position, and one each in provocation with the left or the right hip in a figure-of-4 position. Accuracy was tested by comparing internal rotation of the sacrum with internal rotation in the sacroiliac joint. Motion in the sacroiliac joint was assessed by comparing the position of each of the ilia with the reference, the sacrum. Data is shown as mean with 95% confidence interval (CI).

We observed greater motion in the sacroiliac joint than internally in the sacrum, i.e., 0.57° (CI 0.43-0.71) vs. 0.20° (CI 0.11-0.28). The motion of the geometric center of the moving object for the sacroiliac joint was larger on the provoked side; mean difference 0.17 mm (CI 0.01-0.33), P = 0.04. Corresponding figures for rotation were mean difference 0.19° (CI 0.10-0.28), P < 0.001. Compared with the sacrum, the largest motion was seen at the anterior superior iliac spine; mean difference 0.38 mm (CI 0.10-0.66), P = 0.001.

Provocation in the figure-of-4 position of the hip results in sacroiliac joint motion measurable with computed tomography motion analysis. Provocation of the hip induces larger motion on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral sacroiliac joint.

Sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction constitutes a leading cause of pain and disability. Although surgical arthrodesis is traditionally performed under open approaches, the past decade has seen a rise in minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques and new federally approved devices for MIS approaches. In addition to neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, proceduralists from nonsurgical specialties are performing MIS procedures for SI pathology. Here, we analyze trends in SI joint fusions performed by different provider groups, along with trends in the charges billed and reimbursement provided by Medicare.

We review yearly Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data from 2015 to 2020 from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for all SI joint fusions. Patients were stratified as undergoing MIS or open procedures. Utilization was adjusted per million Medicare beneficiaries and weighted averages for charges and reimbursements were calculated, controlling for inflation. Reimbursement-to-charge (RCR) ratios were calculated, reflecting the proportion of provider billed amounts reimbursed by Medicare.

A total of 12 978 SI joint fusion procedures were performed, with the majority (76.5%) being MIS procedures. Most MIS procedures were performed by nonsurgical specialists (52.1%) while most open fusions were performed by spine surgeons (71%). Rapid growth in MIS procedures was noted for all specialty categories, along with an increased number of procedures offered in the outpatient setting and ambulatory surgical centers. The overall RCR increased over time and was ultimately similar between spine surgeons (RCR = 0.26) and nonsurgeon specialists (RCR = 0.27) performing MIS procedures.

Substantial growth in MIS procedures for SI pathology has occurred in recent years in the Medicare population. This growth can largely be attributed to adoption by nonsurgical specialists, whose reimbursement and RCR increased for MIS procedures. Future studies are warranted to better understand the impact of these trends on patient outcomes and costs.

Low back pain is a multidimensional disorder that can originate from a variety of pain generators, including the sacroiliac (SI) joint. Although the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is often used in SI joint treatment studies, the effects of the SI joint on functional disability are likely different from those of other low back pain generators. Thus, we developed the Denver SI Joint Questionnaire (DSIJQ) and performed validation testing in patients (n=24) with SI joint-specific pain at baseline, +2 weeks, and +6 months. Psychometric analyses included test-retest reliability, internal consistency, content validity, convergent criterion validity, divergent criterion validity, and responsiveness. The DSIJQ showed good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.87), internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.842), content validity (<30% floor/ceiling effects), convergent criterion validity (r=0.89; P<.001), and divergent criterion validity (r=-0.33; P=.12). The DSIJQ was correlated with performance on two physical function tests: Timed Upand-Go (r=0.53; P=.008) and 5 Minute Walk (r=-0.52; P=.009). The DSIJQ showed better responsiveness than the ODI (standardized response mean and effect size, 1.14 and 1.45 for DSIJQ and 0.75 and 0.81 for ODI). Overall, the DSIJQ performed well on all psychometrics. Importantly, we validated the DSIJQ with patients' ability to complete two tests of physical functioning. Moreover, the DSIJQ was more sensitive to changes in SI joint disability than the ODI. These psychometrics suggest the DSIJQ is appropriate for evaluating SI joint disability and detecting changes in disability after targeted SI joint treatment. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(6):345-351.].

Iliosacral screw placement is ubiquitous and now part of the surgeon's pelvic trauma armamentarium. More recent evidence supports sacroiliac arthrodesis for treating sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in select patients. Regardless of the surgical indication, there are currently no studies examining lag screw compression biomechanics across the SIJ. The objective of this biomechanical investigation was to quantify iliosacral implant compressive loads and to examine the insertion torque and compressive load profile over time.

Eight human cadaveric pelvic specimens underwent SIJ fixation at S1 and S2 using 11.5 and 10.0 mm iFuse-TORQ Lag implants, respectively, and standard 7.3 mm trauma lag screws. Load decay analysis was performed, and insertion and removal torques were measured.

For both implants at S1 and S2 levels, the load relaxed 50% in approximately 67 min. Compressive load decay was approximately 70% on average occurring approximately 15 h post-insertion. Average insertion torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant at S1 was significantly greater than the trauma lag screw. Similarly, at S2, insertion torque of the 10.0 mm TORQ implant was greater than the trauma lag screw. At S1, removal torque for the 11.5 mm TORQ implant was higher than the trauma lag screw; there was no significant difference in the removal torque at S2.

In this study, we found that a novel posterior pelvic implant with a larger diameter, roughened surface, and dual pitch threads achieved improved insertion and removal torques compared to a standard screw. Load relaxation characteristics were similar between all implants.

Reporting the clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and complications following an imaging-guided percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction and evaluating the safety and effectiveness of this method.

We performed a retrospective study on a prospectively gathered cohort of patients with physiotherapy-resistant pain due to sacroiliac joint incompetence that underwent percutaneous screw fixation, between 2016 and 2022 in our center. A minimum of two screws were used in all patients to obtain fixation of the sacroiliac joint, using percutaneous screw insertion under CT guidance, coupled with a C-arm fluoroscopy unit.

The mean visual analog scale significantly improved at 6 months of follow-up (p < 0.05). One hundred percent of the patients reported significant improvement in pain scores at the final follow-up. None of our patients experienced intraoperative or postoperative complications.

The use of percutaneous sacroiliac screws provides a safe and effective technique for the treatment of sacroiliac joint dysfunction in patients with chronic resistant pain.

The assessment of inflammatory and structural lesions in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is crucial in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). HLA-B27 status plays an important role in axSpA diagnosis and has been linked to MRI lesion burden in the general population. We aimed to investigate the sex-specific influence of HLA-B27 status on inflammatory and structural MRI findings in patients with low back pain of non-inflammatory origin.

This post hoc analysis included 139 non-axSpA patients (90 women) with chronic low back pain. Two readers scored MRIs of the SIJ for the presence of sclerosis, erosion, fat metaplasia, bone marrow oedema (BMO) and ankylosis. Frequencies and extent of lesions were compared regarding the HLA-B27 status using χ2 tests and t-tests. Regression models to assess the sex-dependent influence of HLA-B27 on lesion burden were computed.

HLA-B27 was positive in 33 women (36.7%) and 23 men (46.9%). The overall occurrence of all SIJ lesions did not differ in HLA-B27 negative and positive individuals. There were no significant differences in the extent of lesions considering the HLA-B27 positivity, for erosion (mean sum score (MSS) of 0.91 vs 0.48; p=0.144), sclerosis (MSS 1.65 vs 1.88; p=0.576), fat metaplasia (MSS 0.56 vs 0.27; p=0.425), BMO (MSS 0.75 vs 0.59; p=0.460) and ankylosis (MSS 0.06 vs 0.04; p=0.659).

HLA-B27 status has no significant influence on the occurrence and extent of SIJ lesions in patients with low back pain of non-inflammatory origin in either men or women.

We aimed to identify the most effective clinical treatment method for sacroiliac joint (SIJ)-related pain based on the systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of clinical interventions for sacroiliac joint pain by pooling the randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Our team conducted a systematic review and NMA of RCTs to determine the most effective clinical treatment for SIJ-related pain. We searched the PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases for RCTs until February 2023. The PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines were followed. Pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted using a random effects model.

Based on the search strategy and inclusion criteria, our systematic review and NMA included 9 randomized studies with 652 participants. Research has mainly focused on various radiofrequency sources, but their number is still low. In the network analysis, according to the NMA and mean ranking probabilities for the improvement of pain intensity (PI) and quality of life (QoL), sacroiliac joint fusion and cooled radiofrequency were associated with high treatment rank for improving PI and QoL in patients with sacroiliac joint pain.

This NMA suggest that SIJ fusion and cooled radiofrequency could be potential options for improving the QoL and relieving pain in patients with SIJ-related pain. Comparison studies of outcomes between these 2 procedures with solid methodology and a low risk of bias would be very beneficial to identify the optimal treatment option for this challenging disease.

(1) Background: Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion is the preferred surgical intervention to treat chronically severe pain associated with SIJ degeneration and dysfunction. (2) Methods: This paper details the ten-step surgical procedure associated with the postero-inferior approach using the PsiF™ DNA Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System. (3) Results: The posterior surgical approach with an inferior operative trajectory (postero-inferior) utilizes easily identifiable landmarks to provide the safest, most direct access to the articular joint space for transfixing device placement. Implanting the device through the subchondral bone provides maximum fixation and stabilization of the joint by utilizing an optimal amount of cortical bone-implant interface. Approaching the joint from the inferior trajectory also places the implant perpendicular to the S1 endplate at a "pivot point" near the sacral axis of rotation, which addresses the most significant motion of the joint. (4) Conclusions: Further observational data from real-world clinical use are encouraged to further validate this procedure as the surgical preference for minimally invasive SIJ fusion.

A 49-year-old woman presented with low back pain after a work-related injury. She failed 5 months of conservative management and subsequently underwent minimally invasive (MI) left sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fusion with 3 triangular titanium implants. Four months postoperatively, she developed recurrence of symptoms and radiographic halo phenomenon about the implants. The cephalad and caudal implants were replaced with threaded self-tapping implants, and the middle implant was unable to be removed. At 7-year follow-up, the halo phenomenon had resolved.

This is an unusual case of radiographic halo phenomenon formation after MI SIJ fusion and halo resolution after subsequent revision.

Posterior and lateral techniques have been described as approaches to sacroiliac joint arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to compare the stabilizing effects of a novel posterior stabilization implant and technique to a previously published lateral approach in a cadaveric multidirectional bending model. We hypothesized that both approaches would have an equivalent stabilizing effect in flexion-extension and that the posterior approach would exhibit better performance in lateral bending and axial rotation. We further hypothesized that unilateral and bilateral posterior fixation would stabilize both the primary and secondary joints.

Ranges of motion (RoMs) of six cadaveric sacroiliac joints were evaluated by an optical tracking system, in a multidirectional flexibility pure moment model, between ± 7.5 N-m applied moment in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation under intact, unilateral fixation, and bilateral fixation conditions.

Intact RoMs were equivalent between both samples. For the posterior intra-articular technique, unilateral fixation reduced the RoMs of both primary and secondary joints in all loading planes (flexion-extension RoM by 45%, lateral bending RoM by 47%, and axial RoM by 33%), and bilateral fixation maintained this stabilizing effect in both joints (flexion-extension at 48%, lateral bending at 53%, and axial rotation at 42%). For the lateral trans-articular technique, only bilateral fixation reduced mean RoM of both primary and secondary sacroiliac joints, and only under flexion-extension loads (60%).

During flexion-extension, the posterior approach is equivalent to the lateral approach, while producing superior stabilization during lateral bend and axial rotation.

An expanding array of image-guided spine interventions have the potential to provide immediate and effective pain relief. Innovations in spine intervention have proceeded rapidly, with clinical adoption of new techniques at times occurring before the development of bodies of evidence to establish efficacy. Although new spine interventions have been evaluated by clinical trials, acceptance of results has been hindered by controversies regarding trial methodology. This article explores controversial aspects of four categories of image-guided interventions for painful conditions: spine interventions for postdural puncture headache resulting from prior lumbar procedures, epidural steroid injections for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy, interventions for facet and sacroiliac joint pain, and vertebral augmentations for compression fractures. For each intervention, we summarize the available literature, with an emphasis on persistent controversies, and discuss how current areas of disagreement and challenge may shape future research and innovation. Despite the ongoing areas of debate regarding various aspects of these procedures, effective treatments continue to emerge and show promise for aiding relief of a range of debilitating conditions.

Cadaveric biomechanics study.

This study investigated the effects of unilateral sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation for fusion with/without L5-S1 fixation on contralateral SIJ range of motion (ROM).

SIJ fusion raises concerns that unilateral SIJ stabilization for fusion may increase contralateral SIJ mobility, leading to accelerated SIJ degeneration. Also, prior lumbosacral fixation may lead to accelerated SIJ degeneration, due to adjacent level effects. SIJ fixation biomechanics have been evaluated, showing a reduced-ROM, but SIJ fixation effects on contralateral nonfixated SIJ remain unknown.

Seven human lumbopelvic spines were used, each affixed to six-degrees-of-freedom testing apparatus; 8.5-Nm pure unconstrained bending moments applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The ROM of left and right SIJ was measured using a motion analysis system. Each specimen tested as (1) intact, (2) injury (left), (3) L5-S1 fixation, (4) unilateral stabilization (left), (5) unilateral stabilization+L5-S1 fixation, (6) bilateral stabilization, and (7) bilateral stabilization+L5-S1 fixation. Both left-sided iliosacral and posterior ligaments were cut for injury condition to model SIJ instability before surgery.

There were no statistical differences between fixated and contralateral nonfixated SIJ ROM following unilateral stabilization with/without L5-S1 fixation for all loading directions (p>0.930). Injured condition and L5-S1 fixation provided the largest motion increases across both joints; no significant differences were recorded between SIJs in any loading direction (p>0.850). Unilateral and bilateral stabilization with/without L5-S1 fixation reduced ROM compared with the injured condition for both SIJs, with bilateral stabilization providing maximum stability.

In the cadaveric model, unilateral SIJ stabilization with/without lumbosacral fixation did not lead to significant contralateral SIJ hypermobility; long-term changes and in vivo response may differ.

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction in athletes affects competitiveness. However, the pathology and imaging features have not been clarified.

To clarify the association between SIJ pain and MRI findings in high-performance athletes.

Fifty-two Japanese high-performance athletes with or without SIJ pain were recruited. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) semi-coronal and semi-axial images of their SIJs were taken. The relationships between high-signal changes in MRI-STIR and SIJ pain and pain duration were investigated. Six athletes with continuous SIJ pain were prospectively followed.

The proportion of athletes with high-signal changes in the SIJ was significantly higher among athletes with SIJ pain for one month or more (76.9%, 10/13) than among athletes with SIJ pain for less than one month (18.2%, 2/11) and among athletes without SIJ pain (28.6%, 8/28). High-signal changes on painful SIJs were most often present in the sacrum. In three of the six athletes who were prospectively followed, the high-signal area and intensity on MRI both diminished as their symptoms improved.

High-signal changes of the SIJ on MRI-STIR images in high-performance athletes may reflect their SIJ pain.

To determine prevalence of variations of subchondral bone appearance that may mimic erosions on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of pediatric sacroiliac (SI) joints according to age and sex.

With ethics committee approval and informed consent, SI joint MRIs of 251 children (132 girls), mean age 12.4 years (range 6.1-18.0 years), were obtained in 2 cohorts: 127 children imaged for nonrheumatic reasons, and 124 children with low back pain but no features of sacroiliitis at initial clinical MRI review. MRIs were reviewed by 3 experienced radiologists, blinded from each other, for 3 features of the cortical black line representing the subchondral bone plate on T1-weighted MRI: visibility, blurring, and irregularity.

Based on agreement from 2 or more readers, the cortical black line was partially absent in 88.4% of the children, blurred in 34.7%, and irregular in 41.4%. All these features were most common on the iliac side of SI joints and at the first sacral vertebra level. Clearly visualized, sharply delineated SI joints with none of these features were seen in only 8.0% of children, or in 35.1% if we conservatively required agreement of all 3 readers to consider a feature present. There was no significant difference between sexes or cohorts; findings were similar across pediatric age groups.

Understanding the normal MRI appearance of the developing SI joint is necessary to distinguish physiologic findings from disease. At least two-thirds (65%) of normal pediatric SI joints showed at least 1 feature that is a component of the adult definition of SI joint erosions, risking overdiagnosis of sacroiliitis.

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) has attracted increasing attention as a source of low back and groin pain, but the kinematics of SIJ against standing load and its sex difference remain unclear due to the difficulty of in vivo load study. An upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system can provide in vivo imaging both in the supine and standing positions. The reliability of the mobility of SIJ against the standing load was evaluated and its sex difference was examined in healthy young volunteers using an upright MRI.

Static (reliability) and kinematic studies were performed. In the static study, a dry bone of pelvic ring embedded in gel form and frozen in the plastic box was used. In the kinematic study, 19 volunteers (10 males, 9 females) with a mean age of 23.9 years were included. The ilium positions for the sacrum in supine and standing positions were measured against the pelvic coordinates to evaluate the mobility of the SIJ.

In the static study, the residual error of the rotation of the SIJ study was < 0.2°. In the kinematic study, the mean values of SIJ sagittal rotation from supine to standing position in males and females were - 0.9° ± 0.7° (mean ± standard deviation) and - 1.7° ± 0.8°, respectively. The sex difference was statistically significant (p = 0.04). The sagittal rotation of the SIJ showed a significant correlation with the sacral slope.

The residual error for measuring the SIJ rotation using the upright MRI was < 0.2°. The young healthy participants showed sex differences in the sagittal rotation of the SIJ against the standing load and the females showed a larger posterior rotation of the ilium against the sacrum from the supine to standing position than the males. Therefore, upright MRI is useful to investigate SIJ motion.

Painful lumbar spinal disorders represent a leading cause of disability in the US and worldwide. Interventional treatments for lumbar disorders are an effective treatment for the pain and disability from low back pain. Although many established and emerging interventional procedures are currently available, there exists a need for a defined guideline for their appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety.

The ASPN Back Guideline was developed to provide clinicians the most comprehensive review of interventional treatments for lower back disorders. Clinicians should utilize the ASPN Back Guideline to evaluate the quality of the literature, safety, and efficacy of interventional treatments for lower back disorders.

The American Society of Pain and Neuroscience (ASPN) identified an educational need for a comprehensive clinical guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations. Experts from the fields of Anesthesiology, Physiatry, Neurology, Neurosurgery, Radiology, and Pain Psychology developed the ASPN Back Guideline. The world literature in English was searched using Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, BioMed Central, Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, Current Contents Connect, Scopus, and meeting abstracts to identify and compile the evidence (per section) for back-related pain. Search words were selected based upon the section represented. Identified peer-reviewed literature was critiqued using United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria and consensus points are presented.

After a comprehensive review and analysis of the available evidence, the ASPN Back Guideline group was able to rate the literature and provide therapy grades to each of the most commonly available interventional treatments for low back pain.

The ASPN Back Guideline represents the first comprehensive analysis and grading of the existing and emerging interventional treatments available for low back pain. This will be a living document which will be periodically updated to the current standard of care based on the available evidence within peer-reviewed literature.