|
1
|
He Z, An M, Chen D, Peng H, Tao H, Cheung KM. Institution-Based Quality and Safety Improvement Initiatives in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review. JBJS Rev 2025; 13:01874474-202505000-00005. [PMID: 40424411 PMCID: PMC12101897 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.24.00195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving patient safety and healthcare quality is necessary to advance value-based health care. Spine surgery is complex, entailing joint efforts between different disciplines. This scoping review aimed to map the research on establishing and implementing institution-based quality improvement (QI) initiatives in spine surgery. METHODS Studies were identified in electronic searches of PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Qualitative or quantitative studies that report the implementation of QI programs that occurred in or covered spine surgery were included; studies that did not describe the establishment, implementations, impacts, barriers, and facilitators of QI initiatives were excluded. Three reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies, and 2 reviewers extracted data and conducted a quality assessment of full-text articles. Studies were categorized according to dimensions of quality (timely, effective, patient-centered, efficient, equitable, and safe), and quality appraisal was conducted using the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence reporting guidelines. RESULTS The search from the 3 databases yielded 2,876 returns; after removing duplicates, there were 1,274 in total. After screening, 228 records were entered into a full-text review, resulting in 133 records included in the review. Specifically, 88 addressed aspects of efficiency, 74 on safety, 32 on improving effectiveness, 23 on patient-centeredness, 7 on timeliness, and 1 on equity. Of the studies included, 71 rely on retrospective audits, 19 are prospective, and only 8 are interventional trials. Only 67 QI initiatives leveraged the advantages of multidisciplinary teams or the rigor of evidence-based protocols. Study gaps include limited follow-up, small sample sizes, and lack of comprehensive assessment using both objective measures and patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review maps the current research on developing and implementing institution-based QI initiatives in spine surgery. Although most of the initiatives reported show improvement in the quality of health care and patient safety from multiple aspects, the sustainability of these initiatives remains unknown, and further studies are needed to trace the long-term effects and generalizability of these initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zonglin He
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Meiru An
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Dong Chen
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Huili Peng
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
| | - Huiren Tao
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| | - Kenneth M.C. Cheung
- Orthopaedic Centre, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Futian District, Shenzhen, China
- Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Asthana S, Walker J, Staub J, Bajaj P, Reyes S, Shlobin NA, Beestrum M, Hsu WK, Patel AA, Divi SN. Preference Sensitive Care and Shared Decision-Making in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Scoping Review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2024; 49:788-797. [PMID: 38369716 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/20/2024]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Scoping review. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review exploring the extent to which preference sensitivity has been studied in treatment decisions for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), utilizing shared decision-making (SDM) as a proxy. BACKGROUND Preference-sensitive care involves situations where multiple treatment options exist with significant tradeoffs in cost, outcome, recovery time, and quality of life. LSS has gained research focus as a preference-sensitive care scenario. MATERIALS AND METHODS A scoping review protocol in accordance with "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews" regulations was registered with the Open Science Framework (ID: 9ewup) and conducted across multiple databases from January 2000 to October 2022. Study selection and characterization were performed by 3 independent reviewers and an unbiased moderator. RESULTS The search resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies varying in design and sample size, with most published between 2016 and 2021. The studies examined variables related to SDM, patient preferences, surgeon preferences, and decision aids (DAs). The outcomes assessed included treatment choice, patient satisfaction, and patient understanding. Several studies reported that SDM influenced treatment choice and patient satisfaction, while the impact on patient understanding was less clear. DAs were used in some studies to facilitate SDM. CONCLUSION The scoping review identified a gap in comprehensive studies analyzing the preference sensitivity of treatment for LSS and the role of DAs. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of patient preferences on treatment decisions and the effectiveness of DAs in LSS care. This review provides a foundation for future research in preference-sensitive care and SDM in the context of lumbar stenosis treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shravan Asthana
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - James Walker
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Jacob Staub
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Pranav Bajaj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Samuel Reyes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Nathan A Shlobin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Molly Beestrum
- Department of Research and Information Services, Galter Health Sciences Library and Learning Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Wellington K Hsu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Alpesh A Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Srikanth N Divi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Ayre J, Kumarage R, Jenkins H, McCaffery KJ, Maher CG, Hancock MJ. A Decision Aid for Patients Considering Surgery for Sciatica: Codesign and User-Testing With Patients and Clinicians. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14111. [PMID: 38896009 PMCID: PMC11186058 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery can help patients with leg pain caused by sciatica recover faster, but by 12 months outcomes are similar to nonsurgical management. For many the decision to have surgery may require reflection, and patient decision aids are an evidence-based clinical tool that can help guide patients through this decision. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and refine a decision aid for patients with sciatica who are deciding whether to have surgery or 'wait and see' (i.e., try nonsurgical management first). DESIGN Semistructured interviews with think-aloud user-testing protocol. PARTICIPANTS Twenty clinicians and 20 patients with lived experience of low back pain or sciatica. OUTCOME MEASURES Items from Technology Acceptance Model, Preparation for Decision Making Scale and Decision Quality Instrument for Herniated Disc 2.0 (knowledge instrument). METHODS The prototype integrated relevant research with working group perspectives, decision aid standards and health literacy guidelines. The research team refined the prototype through seven rounds of user-testing, which involved discussing user-testing feedback and implementing changes before progressing to the next round. RESULTS As a result of working group feedback, the decision aid was divided into sections: before, during and after a visit to the surgeon. Across all rounds of user-testing, clinicians rated the resource 5.9/7 (SD = 1.0) for perceived usefulness, and 6.0/7 for perceived ease of use (SD = 0.8). Patients reported the decision aid was easy to understand, on average correctly answering 3.4/5 knowledge questions (SD = 1.2) about surgery for sciatica. The grade reading score for the website was 9.0. Patients scored highly on preparation for decision-making (4.4/5, SD = 0.7), suggesting strong potential to empower patients. Interview feedback showed that patients and clinicians felt the decision aid would encourage question-asking and help patients reflect on personal values. CONCLUSIONS Clinicians found the decision aid acceptable, patients found it was easy to understand and both groups felt it would empower patients to actively engage in their care and come to an informed decision that aligned with personal values. Input from the working group and user-testing was crucial for ensuring that the decision aid met patient and clinician needs. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patients and clinicians contributed to prototype development via the working group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Ayre
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Richie Kumarage
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Hazel Jenkins
- Department of Chiropractic, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human SciencesMacquarie UniversityMacquarie ParkNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Kirsten J. McCaffery
- Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Christopher G. Maher
- Institute of Musculoskeletal Health, Faculty of Medicine and HealthThe University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health DistrictSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Mark J. Hancock
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human SciencesMacquarie UniversityMacquarie ParkNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Stacey D, Lewis KB, Smith M, Carley M, Volk R, Douglas EE, Pacheco-Brousseau L, Finderup J, Gunderson J, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Bravo P, Steffensen K, Gogovor A, Graham ID, Kelly SE, Légaré F, Sondergaard H, Thomson R, Trenaman L, Trevena L. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:CD001431. [PMID: 38284415 PMCID: PMC10823577 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 52.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient decision aids are interventions designed to support people making health decisions. At a minimum, patient decision aids make the decision explicit, provide evidence-based information about the options and associated benefits/harms, and help clarify personal values for features of options. This is an update of a Cochrane review that was first published in 2003 and last updated in 2017. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of patient decision aids in adults considering treatment or screening decisions using an integrated knowledge translation approach. SEARCH METHODS We conducted the updated search for the period of 2015 (last search date) to March 2022 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, EBSCO, and grey literature. The cumulative search covers database origins to March 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA We included published randomized controlled trials comparing patient decision aids to usual care. Usual care was defined as general information, risk assessment, clinical practice guideline summaries for health consumers, placebo intervention (e.g. information on another topic), or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently screened citations for inclusion, extracted intervention and outcome data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Primary outcomes, based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), were attributes related to the choice made (informed values-based choice congruence) and the decision-making process, such as knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, feeling informed, clear values, participation in decision-making, and adverse events. Secondary outcomes were choice, confidence in decision-making, adherence to the chosen option, preference-linked health outcomes, and impact on the healthcare system (e.g. consultation length). We pooled results using mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), applying a random-effects model. We conducted a subgroup analysis of 105 studies that were included in the previous review version compared to those published since that update (n = 104 studies). We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess the certainty of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS This update added 104 new studies for a total of 209 studies involving 107,698 participants. The patient decision aids focused on 71 different decisions. The most common decisions were about cardiovascular treatments (n = 22 studies), cancer screening (n = 17 studies colorectal, 15 prostate, 12 breast), cancer treatments (e.g. 15 breast, 11 prostate), mental health treatments (n = 10 studies), and joint replacement surgery (n = 9 studies). When assessing risk of bias in the included studies, we rated two items as mostly unclear (selective reporting: 100 studies; blinding of participants/personnel: 161 studies), due to inadequate reporting. Of the 209 included studies, 34 had at least one item rated as high risk of bias. There was moderate-certainty evidence that patient decision aids probably increase the congruence between informed values and care choices compared to usual care (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.44 to 2.13; 21 studies, 9377 participants). Regarding attributes related to the decision-making process and compared to usual care, there was high-certainty evidence that patient decision aids result in improved participants' knowledge (MD 11.90/100, 95% CI 10.60 to 13.19; 107 studies, 25,492 participants), accuracy of risk perceptions (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.61 to 2.34; 25 studies, 7796 participants), and decreased decisional conflict related to feeling uninformed (MD -10.02, 95% CI -12.31 to -7.74; 58 studies, 12,104 participants), indecision about personal values (MD -7.86, 95% CI -9.69 to -6.02; 55 studies, 11,880 participants), and proportion of people who were passive in decision-making (clinician-controlled) (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.88; 21 studies, 4348 participants). For adverse outcomes, there was high-certainty evidence that there was no difference in decision regret between the patient decision aid and usual care groups (MD -1.23, 95% CI -3.05 to 0.59; 22 studies, 3707 participants). Of note, there was no difference in the length of consultation when patient decision aids were used in preparation for the consultation (MD -2.97 minutes, 95% CI -7.84 to 1.90; 5 studies, 420 participants). When patient decision aids were used during the consultation with the clinician, the length of consultation was 1.5 minutes longer (MD 1.50 minutes, 95% CI 0.79 to 2.20; 8 studies, 2702 participants). We found the same direction of effect when we compared results for patient decision aid studies reported in the previous update compared to studies conducted since 2015. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to usual care, across a wide variety of decisions, patient decision aids probably helped more adults reach informed values-congruent choices. They led to large increases in knowledge, accurate risk perceptions, and an active role in decision-making. Our updated review also found that patient decision aids increased patients' feeling informed and clear about their personal values. There was no difference in decision regret between people using decision aids versus those receiving usual care. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of patient decision aids on adherence and downstream effects on cost and resource use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | | | - Meg Carley
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Robert Volk
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elisa E Douglas
- Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Jeanette Finderup
- Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Michael J Barry
- Informed Medical Decisions Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carol L Bennett
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Paulina Bravo
- Education and Cancer Prevention, Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago, Chile
| | - Karina Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, IRS - Lillebælt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Amédé Gogovor
- VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventative Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Shannon E Kelly
- Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- Centre de recherche sur les soins et les services de première ligne de l'Université Laval (CERSSPL-UL), Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Richard Thomson
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Logan Trenaman
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Wasedar V, Pangam B, Shete S, Belaval V. Complete resolution of lumbar disc sequestration with Ayurveda management: A case report. J Ayurveda Integr Med 2023; 14:100826. [PMID: 38006747 PMCID: PMC10785238 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaim.2023.100826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is the most common spinal disorder among which disc sequestration is a severe type where the herniated disc fragment migrates and is completely separated from the parent disc. A 46-year-old female patient with severe lower back pain radiating to right lower limb, disability, and numbness in the affected extremity came to Panchakarma O.P.D of our hospital. She was a chronic case of disc sequestration where her symptoms were severely aggravated after a sudden jolt felt on her lower back while traveling on a motorcycle. The patient's Oswestry disability index (ODI) score was 90 % which indicates a bed-bound condition and even Schobar's test indicated a severe reduction in lumbar flexion capability. MRI showed postero-central herniation with disc sequestration at L5-S1 caused compression on the subarachnoid space and traversing S1 nerve roots. She was treated according to Ayurveda treatment principles and underwent Panchakarma like medicated enema (Basti) and fomentation of a lumbosacral region with oil (Kati Basti). She also received different oral medications on successive follow-ups. After 6 months of Ayurveda treatment, the patient showed remission in lower back pain (LBP), radiculopathy, and numbness. Her ODI score was reduced to 6 %. The MRI repeated post-treatment showed complete interval resolution of disc sequestration and no neurological compression was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vishwanath Wasedar
- Department of Panchakarma, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research (KAHER) Shri.B. M. kankanwadi Ayurveda College and Research Centre, Shahapur, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590003, India.
| | - Bhagyesh Pangam
- Department of Panchakarma, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research (KAHER) Shri.B. M. kankanwadi Ayurveda College and Research Centre, Shahapur, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590003, India; Heal Hub Ayurveda & Panchakarma Hospital, Miraj, Maharashtra, 416 410, India
| | - Sarang Shete
- Department of Orthopaedics, KLE Academy of Higher Education & Research (KAHER) Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Nehru Nagar, Belagavi, Karnataka, 590010, India
| | - Vinay Belaval
- Belcity Scan and Diagnostic Centre, Ayodhya Nagar, Belagavi, 590016, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Mirza AB, Khoja AK, Ali F, El-Sheikh M, Bibi-Shahid A, Trindade J, Rocos B, Grahovac G, Bull J, Montgomery A, Arvin B, Sadek AR. The use of e-consent in surgery and application to neurosurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:3149-3180. [PMID: 37695436 PMCID: PMC10624752 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-023-05776-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The integration of novel electronic informed consent platforms in healthcare has undergone significant growth over the last decade. Adoption of uniform, accessible, and robust electronic online consenting applications is likely to enhance the informed consent process and improve the patient experience and has the potential to reduce medico-legal ramifications of inadequate consent. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the utility of novel electronic means of informed consent in surgical patients and discuss its application to neurosurgical cohorts. METHODS A review of randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies of health interventions, and single group pre-post design studies in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Random effects modelling was used to estimate pooled proportions of study outcomes. Patient satisfaction with the informed consent process and patients' gain in knowledge were compared for electronic technologies versus non-electronic instruments. A sub-group analysis was conducted to compare the utility of electronic technologies in neurosurgical cohorts relative to other surgical patients in the context of patient satisfaction and knowledge gain. RESULTS Of 1042 screened abstracts, 63 studies were included: 44 randomised controlled trials (n = 4985), 4 non-randomised studies of health interventions (n = 387), and 15 single group pre-post design studies (n = 872). Meta-analysis showed that electronic technologies significantly enhanced patient satisfaction with the informed consent process (P < 0.00001) and patients' gain in knowledge (P < 0.00001) compared to standard non-electronic practices. Sub-group analysis demonstrated that neurosurgical patient knowledge was significantly enhanced with electronic technologies when compared to other surgical patients (P = 0.009), but there was no difference in patient satisfaction between neurosurgical cohorts and other surgical patients with respect to electronic technologies (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS Novel electronic technologies can enhance patient satisfaction and increase patients' gain in knowledge of their surgical procedures. Electronic patient education tools can significantly enhance patient knowledge for neurosurgical patients. If used appropriately, these modalities can shorten and/or improve the consent discussion, streamlining the surgical process and improving satisfaction for neurosurgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Abbas Khizar Khoja
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK.
- King's College Hospital, Kings NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
| | - Fizza Ali
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Ammal Bibi-Shahid
- Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Brett Rocos
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gordan Grahovac
- King's College Hospital, Kings NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Bull
- Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Babak Arvin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Queens Hospital Romford, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Elsamadicy AA, Wang C, Reeves BC, Sherman JJZ, Craft S, Rajjoub R, Koo A, Hersh AM, Pennington Z, Lo SFL, Shin JH, Mendel E, Sciubba DM. Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Perception of Health Status and Literacy in Spine Oncological Patients: Insights from the All of Us Research Program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2023; 48:1107-1115. [PMID: 37163649 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000004712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN A cross-sectional study was performed using the National Institutes of Health All of Us survey database. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess socioeconomic and racial disparities in the perception of personal health, health literacy, and healthcare access among spine oncology patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in health literacy and perception of health status have been described for many disease processes. However, few studies have assessed the prevalence of these disparities among spine oncology patients. METHODS Adult spine oncology patients, identified using ICD-9/10-CM codes, were categorized by race/ethnicity: White/Caucasian (WC), Black/African-American (BAA), and Non-White Hispanic (NWH). Demographics and socioeconomic status were assessed. Questionnaire responses regarding baseline health status, perception of health status, health literacy, and barriers to healthcare were compared. RESULTS Of the 1,175 patients identified, 207 (17.6%) were BAA, 267 (22.7%) were NWH, and 701 (59.7%) were WC. Socioeconomic status varied among cohorts, with WC patients reporting higher levels of education ( P<0.001 ), annual income greater than $50K ( P<0.001 ), and home ownership ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH patients reported greater rates of 7-day "Severe fatigue" ( P<0.001 ) and "10/10 pain" ( P<0.001 ) and lower rates of "Completely" able to perform everyday activities ( P<0.001 ). WC patients had a higher response rate for "Excellent/Very Good" regarding their own general health ( P<0.001 ) and quality ( P<0.001 ). The WC cohort had a significantly higher proportion of patients responding "Never" when assessing difficulty understanding ( P<0.001 ) and needing assistance with health materials ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH were significantly less likely to report feeling "Extremely" confident with medical forms ( P<0.001 ). BAA and NWH had significantly higher response rates to feeling "Somewhat Worried" about healthcare costs ( P<0.001 ) and with delaying medical care given "Can't Afford Co-pay" ( P<0.001 ). CONCLUSION We identified disparities in perception of health status, literacy, and access among spine oncology patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chelsea Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Benjamin C Reeves
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Josiah J Z Sherman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Samuel Craft
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Rami Rajjoub
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Andrew Koo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Andrew M Hersh
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Sheng-Fu Larry Lo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| | - John H Shin
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ehud Mendel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, John Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, Long Island Jewish Medical Center and North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Turnbull S, Walsh NE, Moore AJ. Adaptation and Implementation of a Shared Decision-Making Tool From One Health Context to Another: Partnership Approach Using Mixed Methods. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e42551. [PMID: 37405845 DOI: 10.2196/42551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of pain and disability. Knee osteoarthritis accounts for nearly four-fifths of the burden of osteoarthritis internationally, and 10% of adults in the United Kingdom have the condition. Shared decision-making (SDM) supports patients to make more informed choices about treatment and care while reducing inequities in access to treatment. We evaluated the experience of a team adapting an SDM tool for knee osteoarthritis and the tool's implementation potential within a local clinical commissioning group (CCG) area in southwest England. The tool aims to prepare patients and clinicians for SDM by providing evidence-based information about treatment options relevant to disease stage. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the experiences of a team adapting an SDM tool from one health context to another and the implementation potential of the tool in the local CCG area. METHODS A partnership approach using mixed methods was used to respond to recruitment challenges and ensure that study aims could be addressed within time restrictions. A web-based survey was used to obtain clinicians' feedback on experiences of using the SDM tool. Qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone or video call with a sample of stakeholders involved in adapting and implementing the tool in the local CCG area. Survey findings were summarized as frequencies and percentages. Content analysis was conducted on qualitative data using framework analysis, and data were mapped directly to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS Overall, 23 clinicians completed the survey, including first-contact physiotherapists (11/23, 48%), physiotherapists (7/23, 30%), specialist physiotherapists (4/23, 17%), and a general practitioner (1/23, 4%). Eight stakeholders involved in commissioning, adapting, and implementing the SDM tool were interviewed. Participants described barriers and facilitators to the adaptation, implementation, and use of the tool. Barriers included a lack of organizational culture that supported and resourced SDM, lack of clinician buy-in and awareness of the tool, challenges with accessibility and usability, and lack of adaptation for underserved communities. Facilitators included the influence of clinical leaders' belief that SDM tools can improve patient outcomes and National Health Service resource use, clinicians' positive experiences of using the tool, and improving awareness of the tool. Themes were mapped to 13 of the 14 TDF domains. Usability issues were described, which did not map to the TDF domains. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights barriers and facilitators to adapting and implementing tools from one health context to another. We recommend that tools selected for adaptation should have a strong evidence base, including evidence of effectiveness and acceptability in the original context. Legal advice should be sought regarding intellectual property early in the project. Existing guidance for developing and adapting interventions should be used. Co-design methods should be applied to improve adapted tools' accessibility and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Turnbull
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Nicola E Walsh
- Centre for Health and Clinical Research, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew J Moore
- Musculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Healy S, Dorflinger E, Michaleff ZA, Marks D. Patient preferences and decision-making when considering surgery for musculoskeletal disorders: A mixed methods systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:312-337. [PMID: 37316969 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The burden of Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) is large. Surgery is an important management option but the factors that shape patients' surgical decisions are not well understood. As prior reviews have explored only single data types or conditions, a mixed methods appraisal across the musculoskeletal spectrum was undertaken. METHODS A mixed-methods systematic, convergent segregated approach was used, with PubMed, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHAL), Embase and PsycINFO searched to identify studies of adult patients' decisions about whether to undergo surgery. A narrative synthesis was conducted, with identified themes integrated across quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies. RESULTS Forty-six studies were included (24 quantitative, 19 qualitative and three mixed methods), with four decision-making themes identified (symptoms, sociodemographic and health factors, information and perceptions). Decision-making involves a complex interaction of individual sociodemographic, health and symptom information, integrated with individual perceptions of candidacy and surgical expectations. While most studies investigated hip and knee surgery, across all included conditions, patients are more likely to favour surgery if symptoms and/or dysfunction are higher, and if perceptions of surgical candidacy and processes (outcomes, inconvenience, and risk) are favourable. Other factors including age, general health, race, financial context, professional and non-professional communication, and information sources also impact decision-making but exert a less consistent impact upon the propensity to prefer surgery. CONCLUSION Patients are more likely to choose surgery for MSD when they have higher levels of symptoms or dysfunction and positive perceptions of surgical suitability and expectations. Other factors important to individuals, have a less consistent impact upon the propensity to prefer surgery. These findings have potential to aid the efficient referral of patients to orthopaedics. More research is needed to validate these findings across the spectrum of MSD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Healy
- Bond University Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Eric Dorflinger
- Bond University Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Robina, Queensland, Australia
| | - Zoe A Michaleff
- Northern New South Wales Local Health District, Lismore, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Darryn Marks
- Bond University Faculty of Health Science and Medicine, School of Physiotherapy, Bond Institute of Health and Sport, Robina, Queensland, Australia
- Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Cheng LJ, Bansback N, Liao M, Wu VX, Wang W, Liu GKP, Hey HWD, Luo N. Patient decision support interventions for candidates considering elective surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1382-1399. [PMID: 37026838 PMCID: PMC10389624 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase in elective surgeries and varied postoperative patient outcomes has boosted the use of patient decision support interventions (PDSIs). However, evidence on the effectiveness of PDSIs are not updated. This systematic review aims to summarize the effects of PDSIs for surgical candidates considering elective surgeries and to identify their moderators with an emphasis on the type of targeted surgery. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We searched eight electronic databases for randomized controlled trials evaluating PDSIs among elective surgical candidates. We documented the effects on invasive treatment choice, decision-making-related outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and healthcare resource use. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool version 2 and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations were adopted to rate the risk of bias of individual trials and certainty of evidence, respectively. STATA 16 software was used to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS Fifty-eight trials comprising 14 981 adults from 11 countries were included. Overall, PDSIs had no effect on invasive treatment choice (risk ratio=0.97; 95% CI: 0.90, 1.04), consultation time (mean difference=0.04 min; 95% CI: -0.17, 0.24), or patient-reported outcomes, but had a beneficial effect on decisional conflict (Hedges' g =-0.29; 95% CI: -0.41, -0.16), disease and treatment knowledge (Hedges' g =0.32; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.49), decision-making preparedness (Hedges' g =0.22; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.34), and decision quality (risk ratio=1.98; 95% CI: 1.15, 3.39). Treatment choice varied with surgery type and self-guided PDSIs had a greater effect on disease and treatment knowledge enhancement than clinician-delivered PDSIs. CONCLUSIONS This review has demonstrated that PDSIs targeting individuals considering elective surgeries had benefited their decision-making by reducing decisional conflict and increasing disease and treatment knowledge, decision-making preparedness, and decision quality. These findings may be used to guide the development and evaluation of new PDSIs for elective surgical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Jie Cheng
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nick Bansback
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Meixia Liao
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vivien Xi Wu
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wenru Wang
- Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gabriel Ka Po Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Hwee Weng Dennis Hey
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore
| | - Nan Luo
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Clinical Characteristics of Minimal Lumbar Disc Herniation and Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via Transforaminal Approach: A Retrospective Study. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13030552. [PMID: 36983733 PMCID: PMC10054638 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13030552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To define the characteristics of Mini LDH, develop new diagnostic references and examine the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via a transforaminal approach (TF-PELD) for it. Methods: A total of 72 patients who underwent TF-PELD with Mini LDH from September 2019 to October 2022 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients’ basic information, symptoms, number of outpatient visits, duration of conservative treatment, physical examination findings and so on were obtained from the medical records. Clinical effects of TF-PELD for Mini LDH were assessed by means of the following: the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional status assessment and Modified Mac Nab criteria for patient satisfaction. Results: Mini LDH have specific clinical characteristics and imaging features. All included patients achieved obvious pain relief after TF-PELD surgery. Pain scores were repeated at postoperative day 1 and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months later. Results were statistically analyzed. The average VAS-Back, VAS-Leg and ODI scores were all significantly reduced at the first postoperative day and gradually decreased with the follow-up time continuing. In total, 66 out of 72 patients received an excellent or good recovery and no poor result was reported according to the Modified Mac Nab criteria. Conclusions: Mini LDH is a type of LDH with special characteristics and in need of correct diagnosis and active treatment in clinical work. TF-PELD was also found to be an effective procedure for the treatment of Mini LDH.
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Ullrich M, Findl O, Kefer K, Döller B, Varsits R, Hienert J, Hirnschall N. An evaluation of the efficacy of a supplemental computer-based tutorial to enhance the informed consent process for cataract surgery: an exploratory randomized clinical study. BMC Ophthalmol 2022; 22:430. [PMID: 36368980 PMCID: PMC9650904 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02652-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To assess whether informing patients with a computer-based tutorial in addition to standard informed consent influences the patient’s attitude towards surgery and increases patient’s knowledge. Methods In this prospective, exploratory, randomized clinical study, patients scheduled for their first eye cataract surgery were randomly allocated to two groups, receiving standard face-to-face informed consent (control group) or additionally using an interactive computer-based tool (CatInfo) containing an audiovisual presentation about cataract and its treatment (study group). Cataract-related knowledge and decisional confidence (decisional conflict scale (DCS)) were assessed as well as one-month postoperatively decisional regret (decision regret scale (DRS)) and willingness to exchange face-to-face discussion time for the use of such a tool. Results The study comprised 134 patients, 64 patients in the study group and 70 in the control group. Patients in the study group answered more questions correctly, 16.3 ± 2.0 (median 16.5, 11.0–19.0) versus 15.5 ± 1.9 (median 16.0, 8.0–19.0; p = 0.01). Patients showed a high decisional confidence with a study group mean DCS score of 92.4 ± 9.8 (median 96.9, 65.6–100) and control group score of 91.6 ± 10.9 (median 95.3, 43.3–100; p = 0.52). Mean DRS score in the study group was 2.5 ± 8.0 (median 0, 0–40) and 4.3 ± 12.5 (median 0, 0–75) in the control group (p = 0.14). Of study group patients 23 (67.6%) were willing to trade time, on average 158 ± 180 s (median 120 s, 45–900). Satisfaction with the tool was high with a mean of 9.1 ± 1.3 out of 10 (median 9.7, 5.0–10). Conclusions Cataract-related knowledge was generally good, with slightly higher scores in the study group. In both groups, decisional confidence was high and regret after surgery was low. A tendency towards slightly higher decisional confidence and lower regret was found in the study group, although these differences were not statistically significant. Additional use of an interactive computer-based tool may prove useful in the informed consent process in a high-volume cataract outpatient setting. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04975126. Retrospectively registered – July 23, 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12886-022-02652-z.
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Lungu DA, Røislien J, Wiig S, Shortt MT, Ferrè F, Berg SH, Thune H, Brønnick KK. The Role of Recipient Characteristics in Health Video Communication Outcomes: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e30962. [PMID: 34967758 PMCID: PMC8759013 DOI: 10.2196/30962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The importance of effective communication during public health emergencies has been highlighted by the World Health Organization, and it has published guidelines for effective communication in such situations. With video being a popular medium, video communication has been a growing area of study over the past decades and is increasingly used across different sectors and disciplines, including health. Health-related video communication gained momentum during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, and video was among the most frequently used modes of communication worldwide. However, although much research has been done regarding different characteristics of video content (the message) and its delivery (the messenger), there is a lack of knowledge about the role played by the characteristics of the recipients for the creation of effective communication. OBJECTIVE The aim of this review is to identify how health video communication outcomes are shaped by recipient characteristics, as such characteristics might affect the effectiveness of communication. The main research question of the study is as follows: do the characteristics of the recipients of health videos affect the outcomes of the communication? METHODS A scoping review describing the existing knowledge within the field was conducted. We searched for literature in 3 databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) and defined eligibility criteria based on the relevance to the research question. Recipient characteristics and health video communication outcomes were identified and classified. RESULTS Of the 1040 documents initially identified, 128 (12.31%) met the criteria for full-text assessment, and 39 (3.75%) met the inclusion criteria. The included studies reported 56 recipient characteristics and 42 communication outcomes. The reported associations between characteristics and outcomes were identified, and the potential research opportunities were discussed. Contributions were made to theory development by amending the existing framework of the Integrated-Change model, which is an integrated model of motivational and behavioral change. CONCLUSIONS Although several recipient characteristics and health video communication outcomes were identified, there is a lack of robust empirical evidence on the association between them. Further research is needed to understand how the preceding characteristics of the recipients might affect the various outcomes of health video communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Adrian Lungu
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Jo Røislien
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Siri Wiig
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Marie Therese Shortt
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Francesca Ferrè
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Siv Hilde Berg
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Henriette Thune
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick
- SHARE - Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Department of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
van Dijk LA, Vervest AMJS, Baas DC, Poolman RW, Haverkamp D. Decision aids can decrease decisional conflict in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis: Randomized controlled trial. World J Orthop 2021; 12:1026-1035. [PMID: 35036345 PMCID: PMC8696597 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i12.1026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interest in shared decision making has increased considerably over the last couple of decades. Decision aids (DAs) can help in shared decision making. Especially when there is more than one reasonable option and outcomes between treatments are comparable.
AIM To investigate if the use of DAs decreases decisional conflict in patients when choosing treatment for knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).
METHODS In this multi-center unblinded randomized controlled trial of patients with knee or hip OA were included from four secondary and tertiary referral centers. One-hundred-thirty-one patients who consulted an orthopedic surgeon for the first time with knee or hip OA were included between December 2014 and January 2016. After the first consultation, patients were randomly assigned by a computer to the control group which was treated according to standard care, or to the intervention group which was treated with standard care and provided with a DA. After the first consultation, patients were asked to complete questionnaires about decisional conflict (DCS), satisfaction, anxiety (PASS-20), gained knowledge, stage of decision making and preferred treatment. Follow-up was carried out after 26 wk and evaluated decisional conflict, satisfaction, anxiety, health outcomes (HOOS/KOOS), quality of life (EQ5D) and chosen treatment.
RESULTS After the first consultation, patients in the intervention group (mean DCS: 25 out of 100, SD: 13) had significantly (P value: 0.00) less decisional conflict compared to patients in the control group (mean DCS: 39 out of 100, SD 11). The mean satisfaction score for the given information (7.6 out of 10, SD: 1.8 vs 8.6 out of 10, SD: 1.1) (P value: 0.00), mean satisfaction score with the physician (8.3 out of 10, SD: 1.7 vs 8.9 out of 10, SD: 0.9) (P value: 0.01) and the mean knowledge score (3.3 out of 4, SD: 0.9 vs 3.7 out of, SD: 0.6) (P value: 0.01) were all significantly higher in the intervention group. At 26-wk follow-up, only 75 of 131 patients (57%) were available for analysis. This sample is too small for meaningful analysis.
CONCLUSION Providing patients with an additional DA may have a positive effect on decisional conflict after the first consultation. Due to loss to follow-up we are unsure if this effect remains over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lode A van Dijk
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum 1213 XZ, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Antonius MJS Vervest
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum 1213 XZ, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Dominique C Baas
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum 1213 XZ, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Rudolf W Poolman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam 1091 AC, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden 2333 ZA, Netherlands
| | - Daniel Haverkamp
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Xpert Orthopedie Amsterdam/SCORE (Specialized Center of Orthopedic Research and Education), Amsterdam 1101 EA, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Chen CH, Kang YN, Chiu PY, Huang YJ, Elwyn G, Wu MH, Kang JH, Hou WH, Kuo KN. Effectiveness of shared decision-making intervention in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases: A randomized controlled trial. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2021; 104:2498-2504. [PMID: 33741234 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention among patients with lumbar degenerative diseases (LDDs) in terms of decision self-efficacy, control preferences, SDM process, decision satisfaction, and conflict. METHODS A total of 130 outpatients with LDDs recruited from orthopedic or rehabilitation clinics were randomly assigned to the SDM intervention (n = 67) or comparison (n = 63) groups. Patients in the intervention group received decision aids (DAs) with decision coaching and those in controlled group received standard educational materials from a health educator. The primary outcome was decision self-efficacy, and secondary outcomes were control preference, SDM process, conflict, and satisfaction. RESULTS The SDM intervention significantly improved decision self-efficacy (mean difference [MD] = 7.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-12.5, partial η2 = 0.05) and reduced conflict (MD = -7.0, 95% CI: -12.2 to -1.9, partial η2 = 0.06), especially in patients without family involvement, compared with the health education group. However, no significant between-group differences were observed in other outcomes. CONCLUSION SDM intervention improved SDM self-efficacy and reduced conflict in patients with LDDs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians can integrate DAs and decision coaching in SDM conversations. SDM intervention seems to engage patients in decision-making, especially those without family involvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Hsien Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University-Shuang Ho Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, New Taipei City, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Biomedical Materials and Tissue Engineering, College of Biomedical Engineering, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-No Kang
- Institute of Health Policy and Management, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Yao Chiu
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jing Huang
- Research Center of Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Cochrane Institute for Primary Care and Public Health, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Meng-Huang Wu
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedics, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiunn-Horng Kang
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Hsuan Hou
- Master Program in Long-Term Care, College of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Center of Evidence-Based Medicine, Department of Education, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ken N Kuo
- Cochrane Taiwan, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Bowen E, Nayfe R, Milburn N, Mayo H, Reid MC, Fraenkel L, Weiner D, Halm EA, Makris UE. Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 21:951-969. [PMID: 31880805 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the effect of patient decision aids for adults making treatment decisions regarding the management of chronic musculoskeletal pain. METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials of adults using patient decision aids to make treatment decisions for chronic musculoskeletal pain in the outpatient setting. RESULTS Of 477 records screened, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions included osteoarthritis of the hip, knee, or trapeziometacarpal joint and back pain. Thirteen studies evaluated the use of a decision aid for deciding between surgical and nonsurgical management. The remaining four studies evaluated decision aids for nonsurgical treatment options. Outcomes included decision quality, pain, function, and surgery utilization. The effects of decision aids on decision-making outcomes were mixed. Comparing decision aids with usual care, all five studies that examined knowledge scores found improvement in patient knowledge. None of the four studies that evaluated satisfaction with the decision-making process found a difference with use of a decision aid. There was limited and inconsistent data on other decision-related outcomes. Of the eight studies that evaluated surgery utilization, seven found no difference in surgery rates with use of a decision aid. Five studies made comparisons between different types of decision aids, and there was no clearly superior format. CONCLUSIONS Decision aids may improve patients' knowledge about treatment options for chronic musculoskeletal pain but largely did not impact other outcomes. Future efforts should focus on improving the effectiveness of decision aids and incorporating nonpharmacologic and nonsurgical management options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Bowen
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Rabih Nayfe
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Nathaniel Milburn
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Helen Mayo
- Health Sciences Digital Library and Learning Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - M C Reid
- Division of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, Cornell University, New York, New York
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Debra Weiner
- Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,Department of Medicine, Psychiatry, Anesthesiology and Clinical & Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Ethan A Halm
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Una E Makris
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.,Department of Medicine, VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Lubelski D, Feghali J, Nowacki AS, Alentado VJ, Planchard R, Abdullah KG, Sciubba DM, Steinmetz MP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Patient-specific prediction model for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 34:580-588. [PMID: 33528964 DOI: 10.3171/2020.8.spine20577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patient demographics, comorbidities, and baseline quality of life (QOL) are major contributors to postoperative outcomes. The frequency and cost of lumbar spine surgery has been increasing, with controversy revolving around optimal management strategies and outcome predictors. The goal of this study was to generate predictive nomograms and a clinical calculator for postoperative clinical and QOL outcomes following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease. METHODS Patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease at a single tertiary care institution between June 2009 and December 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Nomograms and an online calculator were modeled based on patient demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms and duration of symptoms, indication for surgery, type and levels of surgery, and baseline preoperative QOL scores. Outcomes included postoperative emergency department (ED) visit or readmission within 30 days, reoperation within 90 days, and 1-year changes in the EuroQOL-5D (EQ-5D) score. Bootstrapping was used for internal validation. RESULTS A total of 2996 lumbar surgeries were identified. Thirty-day ED visits were seen in 7%, 30-day readmission in 12%, 90-day reoperation in 3%, and improvement in EQ-5D at 1 year that exceeded the minimum clinically important difference in 56%. Concordance indices for the models predicting ED visits, readmission, reoperation, and dichotomous 1-year improvement in EQ-5D were 0.63, 0.66, 0.73, and 0.84, respectively. Important predictors of clinical outcomes included age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, indication for surgery, preoperative duration of symptoms, and the type (and number of levels) of surgery. A web-based calculator was created, which can be accessed here: https://riskcalc.org/PatientsEligibleForLumbarSpineSurgery/. CONCLUSIONS The prediction tools derived from this study constitute important adjuncts to clinical decision-making that can offer patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery realistic and personalized expectations of postoperative outcome. They may also aid physicians in surgical planning, referrals, and counseling to ultimately lead to improved patient experience and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lubelski
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - James Feghali
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amy S Nowacki
- 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
- 3Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Vincent J Alentado
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Ryan Planchard
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Kalil G Abdullah
- 5Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas; and
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael P Steinmetz
- 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
- 6Department of Neurosurgery and the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Edward C Benzel
- 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
- 6Department of Neurosurgery and the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Thomas E Mroz
- 2Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland
- 6Department of Neurosurgery and the Cleveland Clinic Center for Spine Health, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Momentary pain assessments reveal benefits of endoscopic discectomy: a prospective cohort study. Pain Rep 2021; 6:e906. [PMID: 33981932 PMCID: PMC8108591 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Both pain rating and exponential model revealed that percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy provided rapid pain recovery that was maintained for at least 3 months compared with conservative treatments. Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common back disorder that evokes back and/or leg pain. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) is a minimally invasive surgery for patients with LDH. However, there is little evidence of effectiveness of PELD compared with conservative treatments.
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Pham C, Lizarondo L, Karnon J, Aromataris E, Munn Z, Gibb C, Fitridge R, Maddern G. Strategies for implementing shared decision making in elective surgery by health care practitioners: A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract 2020; 26:582-601. [PMID: 31490593 DOI: 10.1111/jep.13282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To summarize relevant international scientific evidence on strategies aimed at facilitating or improving health care practitioners' adoption of shared decision making in elective surgery. The review evaluated the effectiveness of these strategies and described the characteristics of identified strategies. METHOD A systematic search of the literature was conducted up to March 2019. The review included interventions that targeted patients, health care practitioners, or health systems/organizations. Main outcomes were measures of decision process and decision outcomes. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, assessed methodological quality and extracted data. RESULTS Fifteen randomized controlled trials, one pseudo-randomized controlled trial, and four quasi-experimental studies were included in this review. The heterogeneity of interventions and the variability of outcomes used to measure the impact of these interventions precluded meta-analysis. All of the interventions included an educational component regarding the medical condition of interest and available treatment options and a supportive component to encourage patients to ask questions and involve themselves in the decision making. Published evidence on shared decision-making interventions in elective surgery is most prevalent in the breast cancer/endocrine and urology specialties, with most studies targeting their shared decision-making interventions at the patient population. The use of multiple media components within an intervention including interactive video appeared to improve patient satisfaction with the shared decision-making process. CONCLUSIONS The use of well-developed educational information provided through interactive multimedia, computer or DVD based, may enhance the decision-making process. The evidence suggests that such multimedia can be used prior to the surgical consultation, presenting medical and surgical information relevant to the upcoming consultation. A decision and communication aid also appears to be an effective method to support the surgeon in patient participation and involvement in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clarabelle Pham
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA, Australia
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Lucylynn Lizarondo
- The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Jonathan Karnon
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Edoardo Aromataris
- The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Zachary Munn
- The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Catherine Gibb
- Discipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Robert Fitridge
- Discipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Guy Maddern
- Discipline of Surgery, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Andersen SB, Andersen MØ, Carreon LY, Coulter A, Steffensen KD. Shared decision making when patients consider surgery for lumbar herniated disc: development and test of a patient decision aid. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19:190. [PMID: 31585534 PMCID: PMC6778367 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0906-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a systematic approach aimed at improving patient involvement in preference-sensitive health care decisions. Choosing between surgical or non-surgical treatment for lumbar disc herniation, can be difficult as the evidence of a superior treatment is unclear, which makes it a preference-sensitive decision. The objectives of this study was therefore to assess the degree of SDM and afterwards to develop and test a patient decision aid (PtDA) to support SDM during the clinical encounter between surgeon and patient, when patients choose between surgical and non-surgical treatment for Lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Methods The study was conducted in four steps.
Assessment of the extent to which SDM was practiced in the spine clinic. Development of a PtDA to support SDM. Testing its usability and acceptability amongst potential users (patients). Pilot-test of its usability in the clinical setting. Results Results from our small baseline study (n = 40) showed that between a third and two-thirds of the patients reported not being fully engaged in a shared decision. A pre-designed template (BESLUTNINGSHJÆLPER™) was adapted to support the decision about whether or not to have surgery for LDH. Testing the prototype with patients led to minor refinements. A subsequent pilot test of its usability in a clinical setting achieved positive responses from both patients and clinicians. Conclusion Our baseline study demonstrated that SDM was not universally practiced in the clinic. The PtDA we have developed was rated as acceptable and usable by both patients and clinicians for helping those with LDH choose between surgical or non- surgical treatment. This tool now requires further testing to assess its effectiveness. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-019-0906-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stina Brogård Andersen
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark. .,Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark. .,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Mikkel Ø Andersen
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Leah Y Carreon
- Spine Surgery and Research, Spine Center of Southern Denmark, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Øster Hougvej 55, Middelfart, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Norton Leatherman Spine Center, Louisville, KY, USA
| | - Angela Coulter
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Karina Dahl Steffensen
- Center for Shared Decision Making, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Oncology, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
D'Souza RS, Johnson RL, Bettini L, Schulte PJ, Burkle C. Room for Improvement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on the Informed Consent Process for Emergency Surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2019; 94:1786-1798. [PMID: 31486381 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare recall of complications and surgical details discussed during informed consent and perception of the consent process in patients undergoing emergent vs elective surgery. METHODS Studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Scopus from January 1, 1966, through April 18, 2018. Included studies compared patient recall and perception regarding informed consent in those undergoing emergent vs elective surgery. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for recall of complications and surgical details, patient satisfaction, perception of sufficient information being delivered on surgical risks, report of having read written consent, and factors that interfered with consent. RESULTS Eleven observational studies (3178 patients) were included. The rate of recall of surgical complications (255 of 504 [50.6%] vs 321 of 446 [72.0%]; OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.80) was lower in patients undergoing emergent vs elective surgery. Meta-analysis revealed a decreased rate of patient satisfaction with the consent process (319 of 459 [69.5%] vs 882 of 1064 [82.9%]; OR. 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83) and fewer patients having read the consent form (130 of 395 [32.9%] vs 424 of 714 [59.4%]; OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.27-0.46) when undergoing emergent compared with elective surgery. Patients undergoing emergent surgery listed pain, analgesic medications, and fatigue as factors likely to interfere with consent. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing emergent surgery have poor recall of the informed consent process and surgical complications. Furthermore, patients report lower rates of satisfaction, and with fewer patients reading written consent documentation, our findings illuminate problems with the current communication process. There is a need to develop effective tools to improve informed consent in emergency surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan S D'Souza
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - Rebecca L Johnson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Layne Bettini
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Christopher Burkle
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Spine surgery patients have difficulty comprehending the patient education aimed at preparing for surgery. PURPOSE To assess the effect of a specific preoperative education approach (Knowledge Test Feedback Intervention, KTFI) on patients' verbal and visual understanding of their surgery. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, the intervention group (n = 50) went through the KTFI and routine education, whereas the control group (n = 50) received only routine patient education. Written description of the surgical procedure and drawing of incision were used as outcome measures at baseline, at hospitalization, at discharge, and 3 and 6 months after surgery. RESULTS At baseline, half of the participants showed verbal and visual understanding of their surgery. During follow-up, understanding improved significantly with no statistically significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION Spinal stenosis patients' understanding of their surgical procedure is imperfect. Patient educators need to ensure patient learning by evaluating comprehension outcomes.
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Sugand K, Malik HH, Newman S, Spicer D, Reilly P, Gupte CM. Does using anatomical models improve patient satisfaction in orthopaedic consenting? Single-blinded randomised controlled trial. Surgeon 2019; 17:146-155. [PMID: 30944078 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2018] [Revised: 02/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction in consenting is a major pillar of clinical governance and healthcare quality assessment. The purpose was to observe the effect of using 3D anatomical models of knee and shoulder joints on patient satisfaction during informed consent in the largest single-blinded randomised controlled trial in this field. METHODS 52 patients undergoing elective knee or shoulder surgery were randomised into two groups when being consented. The intervention group (n = 26) was shown an anatomical model of the knee/shoulder joint while the control group (n = 26) was given only a verbal explanation without a model. Patients rated their satisfaction on the validated Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS-26) questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were analysed for specific themes to determine key factors that influenced patient satisfaction. The mean score ±SD were calculated with significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS There was a significant difference in the overall satisfaction between the control and intervention cohorts (MISS-26 score 4.33 [86.6%] ± 0.646 vs 4.70 [94.0%] ± 0.335 respectively, 7.4% improvement, 8.5% difference, p = 0.01). Behavioural criteria showed a 13% increase in satisfaction (p = 0.02). Semi-structured interviews determined that the factors influencing satisfaction included the surgeon's interpersonal manner, the use of the visual aid and seeing the consultant surgeon in clinic. All patients in the intervention cohort identified factors contributing to their satisfaction, whereas a fifth of the control cohort claimed nothing at all made them feel satisfied. CONCLUSION Anatomical models as visual aids significantly increased patient satisfaction during the consenting process and played an integral part of the surgeon's explanation. Patients exposed to anatomical models also claimed to be more satisfied with the surgeon's inter-personal skills. This study recommends the use of anatomical models, which are both cost-effective and easily implementable, during explanation and consent for orthopaedic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Sugand
- MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hospital, Level 7 East, London, UK.
| | - H H Malik
- MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hospital, Level 7 East, London, UK.
| | - S Newman
- MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hospital, Level 7 East, London, UK; Dept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
| | - D Spicer
- Dept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
| | - P Reilly
- Dept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
| | - C M Gupte
- MSk Lab, Charing Cross Hospital, Level 7 East, London, UK; Dept. of Trauma & Orthopaedics, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Zhang MH, Haq ZU, Braithwaite EM, Simon NC, Riaz KM. A randomized, controlled trial of video supplementation on the cataract surgery informed consent process. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2019; 257:1719-1728. [PMID: 31144057 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04372-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effects of the American Academy of Ophthalmology's 2015 patient education video on patient information retention and anxiety preoperatively, on the day of surgery and postoperatively. METHODS This is a prospective, surgeon-blinded randomized controlled trial at the University of Chicago Medical Center. Ninety-one patients with a diagnosis of first-eye cataract were randomized into either a video or control group. Subjects in both groups received face-to-face discussion with the surgeon and an informational brochure at the preoperative evaluation. Participants in the video group then viewed a four-minute educational video at the preoperative evaluation and on the day of surgery. Both groups completed an information retention quiz and a state anxiety assessment at the preoperative visit, on the day of surgery, and on the postoperative week one visit. Subject understanding of cataract surgery was measured using a twelve-question multiple choice quiz. State anxiety was measured by State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y1 survey score. RESULTS Participants in the video group did not score significantly higher on the information retention quiz compared with the control group at the preoperative evaluation (8.7 ± 2.4 vs 7.7 ± 2.5, P = 0.07), but did so on the day of surgery (11.2 ± 0.8 vs 8.4 ± 1.7, P < 0.001) and postoperative week 1 visit (10.8 ± 1.5 vs 9.0 ± 2.0, P < 0.001). Subjects in the video group were significantly less anxious on the day of surgery (26.4 ± 5.1 vs 41.1 ± 10.3, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Video supplementation to the traditional informed consent process demonstrated an improvement in patient understanding of cataract surgery at multiple timepoints and decreased anxiety on the day of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H Zhang
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Zeeshan U Haq
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Evan M Braithwaite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Noah C Simon
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA
| | - Kamran M Riaz
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
- Department of Ophthalmology, Dean McGee Eye Institute, University of Oklahoma, 608 Stanton L. Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Affiliation(s)
- Saadoun Faris Alazmi
- Department of Medical Records, College of Health Sciences, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training (PAAET), Kuwait
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Reduced Elective Operation Rates and High Patient Satisfaction After the Implementation of Decision Aids in Patients with Gallstones or an Inguinal Hernia. World J Surg 2019; 43:2149-2156. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05007-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
|
|
27
|
Decision Aid for Trapeziometacarpal Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44:247.e1-247.e9. [PMID: 30031600 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 05/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Decision aids increase patient participation in decision making and reduce decision conflict. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of a decision aid prior to the appointment, upon decisional conflict measured immediately after the visit relative to usual care. We also evaluated other effects of the decision aid over time. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, we included 90 patients seeking the care of a hand surgeon for trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthritis for the first time. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either usual care (an informational brochure) or an interactive Web-based decision aid. At enrollment, consult duration was recorded, and patients completed the following measures: (1) Decisional Conflict Scale; (2) Quick Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH); (3) pain intensity; (4) Physical Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2); (5) satisfaction with the visit; and (6) Consultation And Relational Empathy (CARE) scale. At 6 weeks and 6 months, patients completed: (1) pain intensity measure; (2) Decision Regret Scale; and (3) satisfaction with treatment. We also recorded changes in treatment and provider. RESULTS Patients who reviewed the interactive decision aid prior to visiting their hand surgeon had less decisional conflict at the end of the visit. Other outcomes were not affected. CONCLUSIONS Use of a decision aid prior to a first-time visit for TMC led to a measurable reduction in decision conflict. Decision aids make people seeking care for TMC arthritis more comfortable with their decision making. Future research might address the ability of decision aids to reduce surgeon-to-surgeon variation, resource utilization, and dissatisfaction with care CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should consider the routine use of decision aids to reduce decision conflict.
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Leinweber KA, Columbo JA, Kang R, Trooboff SW, Goodney PP. A Review of Decision Aids for Patients Considering More Than One Type of Invasive Treatment. J Surg Res 2019; 235:350-366. [PMID: 30691817 PMCID: PMC10647019 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2018] [Revised: 07/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/07/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
With continuous advances in medicine, patients are faced with several medical or surgical treatment options for their health conditions. Decision aids may be useful in helping patients navigate these options and choose based on their goals and values. We reviewed the literature to identify decision aids and better understand the effect on patient decision-making. We identified 107 decision aids designed to help patients make decisions between medical treatment or screening options; 39 decision aids were used to help patients choose between a medical and surgical treatment, and five were identified that aided patients in deciding between a major open surgical procedure and a less invasive option. Many of the decision aids were used to help patients decide between prostate, colorectal, and breast cancer screening or treatment options. Although most decision aids were not associated with a significant effect on the actual decision made, they were largely associated with increased patient knowledge, decreased decisional conflict, more accurate perception of risks, increased satisfaction with their decision, and no increase in anxiety surrounding their decision. These data identify a gap in use of decision aids in surgical decision-making and highlight the potential to help surgical patients make value-based, knowledgeable decisions regarding their treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jesse A Columbo
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; VA Quality Scholars Program, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; VA Outcomes Group, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Ravinder Kang
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; VA Quality Scholars Program, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; VA Outcomes Group, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Spencer W Trooboff
- VA Quality Scholars Program, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; VA Outcomes Group, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Philip P Goodney
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire; VA Quality Scholars Program, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; VA Outcomes Group, Veterans Health Association, White River Junction, Vermont; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Unwarranted regional variation in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in Switzerland: A population-based small area variation analysis. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0208578. [PMID: 30532141 PMCID: PMC6287855 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Accepted: 11/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous vertebroplasty (VP) and balloon kyphoplasty (BKP) for treating painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures are controversial. Objective We assessed the regional variation in the use of VP/BKP in Switzerland. Methods We conducted a population-based small area variation analysis using patient discharge data for VP/BKP from all Swiss hospitals and Swiss census data for calendar years 2012/13. We derived hospital service areas (HSAs) by analyzing patient flows, assigning regions from which most residents were discharged to the same VP/BKP specific HSA. We calculated age-/sex-standardized mean VP/BKP-rates and measures of regional variation (extremal quotient [EQ], systematic component of variation [SCV]). We estimated the reduction in variation of VP/BKP rates using negative binomial regression, with adjustment for patient demographic and regional socioeconomic factors (socioeconomic status, urbanization, and language region). We considered the residual, unexplained variation most likely to be unwarranted. Results Overall, 4955 VP/BKPs were performed in Switzerland in 2012/13. The age-/sex-standardized mean VP/BKP rate was 4.6/10,000 persons and ranged from 1.0 to 10.1 across 26 HSAs. The EQ was 10.2 and the SCV 57.6, indicating a large variation across VP/BKP specific HSAs. After adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic factors, the total reduction in variance was 32.2% only, with the larger part of the variation remaining unexplained. Conclusions We found a 10-fold variation in VP/BKP rates across Swiss VP/BKP specific HSAs. As only one third of the variation was explained by differences in patient demographics and regional socioeconomic factors, VP/BKP in the highest-use areas may, at least partially, represent overtreatment.
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Eggeling M, Bientzle M, Shiozawa T, Cress U, Kimmerle J. The Impact of Visualization Format and Navigational Options on Laypeople's Perception and Preference of Surgery Information Videos: Randomized Controlled Trial and Online Survey. J Particip Med 2018; 10:e12338. [PMID: 33052125 PMCID: PMC7434097 DOI: 10.2196/12338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients need to be educated about possible treatment choices in order to make informed medical decisions. As most patients are medical laypeople, they find it difficult to understand complex medical information sufficiently to feel confident about a decision. Multimedia interventions such as videos are increasingly used to supplement personal consultations with medical professionals. Former research has shown that such interventions may have a positive effect on understanding, decision making, and emotional reactions. However, it is thus far unclear how different features of videos influence these outcomes. Objective We aimed to examine the impact of visualization formats and basic navigational options in medical information videos about cruciate ligament surgery on recipients’ knowledge gain, emotions, attitude, and hypothetical decision-making ability. Methods In a between-group randomized experiment (Study 1), 151 participants watched 1 of 4 videos (schematic vs realistic visualization; available vs unavailable navigational options). In a separate online survey (Study 2), 110 participants indicated their preference for a video design. All participants were medical laypeople without personal experience with a cruciate ligament rupture and were presented with a fictional decision situation. Results In Study 1, participants who used navigational options (n=36) gained significantly more factual knowledge (P=.005) and procedural knowledge (P<.001) than participants who did not have or use navigational options (n=115). A realistic visualization induced more fear (P=.001) and disgust (P<.001) than a schematic video. Attitude toward the surgery (P=.02) and certainty regarding the decision for or against surgery (P<.001) were significantly more positive after watching the video than before watching the video. Participants who watched a schematic video rated the video significantly higher than that by participants who watched a realistic video (P<.001). There were no significant group differences with regard to hypothetical decision making and attitude toward the intervention. In addition, we did not identify any influence of the visualization format on knowledge acquisition. In Study 2, 58 of 110 participants (52.7%) indicated that they would prefer a schematic visualization, 26 (23.6%) preferred a realistic visualization, 17 (15.5%) wanted either visualization, and 9 (8.2%) did not want to watch a video at all. Of the participants who wanted to watch a video, 91 (90.1%) preferred to have navigational options, 3 (3.0%) preferred not to have navigational options, and 7 (6.9%) did not mind the options. Conclusion Our study indicates that the perception of medical information videos is influenced by their design. Schematic videos with navigational options are the most helpful among all videos to avoid negative emotions and support knowledge acquisition when informing patients about an intervention. The visualization format and navigational options are important features that should be considered when designing medical videos for patient education. Trial Registration Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00016003; https://www.drks.de/drks_web/ navigate.do?navigationId= trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00016003 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/746ASSAhN)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Eggeling
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Martina Bientzle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Shiozawa
- Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Cress
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Joachim Kimmerle
- Knowledge Construction Lab, Leibniz-Institut fuer Wissensmedien, Tuebingen, Germany.,Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Decisional Conflict Among Patients Considering Treatment Options for Lumbar Herniated Disc. World Neurosurg 2018; 116:e680-e690. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 05/09/2018] [Accepted: 05/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
Winston K, Grendarova P, Rabi D. Video-based patient decision aids: A scoping review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2018; 101:558-578. [PMID: 29102063 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2017] [Revised: 10/06/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study reviews the published literature on the use of video-based decision aids (DA) for patients. The authors describe the areas of medicine in which video-based patient DA have been evaluated, the medical decisions targeted, their reported impact, in which countries studies are being conducted, and publication trends. METHOD The literature review was conducted systematically using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, and Pubmed databases from inception to 2016. References of identified studies were reviewed, and hand-searches of relevant journals were conducted. RESULTS 488 studies were included and organized based on predefined study characteristics. The most common decisions addressed were cancer screening, risk reduction, advance care planning, and adherence to provider recommendations. Most studies had sample sizes of fewer than 300, and most were performed in the United States. Outcomes were generally reported as positive. This field of study was relatively unknown before 1990s but the number of studies published annually continues to increase. CONCLUSION Videos are largely positive interventions but there are significant remaining knowledge gaps including generalizability across populations. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinicians should consider incorporating video-based DA in their patient interactions. Future research should focus on less studied areas and the mechanisms underlying effective patient decision aids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Winston
- Alberta Children's Hospital, 2800 Shaganappi Trail NW, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada.
| | - Petra Grendarova
- University of Calgary, Division of Radiation Oncology, Calgary, Canada
| | - Doreen Rabi
- University of Calgary, Department of Medicine, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Patients' beliefs about diagnosis and treatment of cervical spondylosis with radiculopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2017; 159:2379-2384. [PMID: 29063271 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3356-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical results of surgical spine care may be influenced by the patients' understanding and knowledge of his or her condition, treatment options and decision-making process. The aim of this survey study was to evaluate certain beliefs and opinions of patients with a degenerative condition in the cervical spine with a history of cervical radiculopathy such as importance of magnetic resonance imaging, risk factors, treatment alternatives and effectiveness. METHODS An anonymous questionnaire survey was performed on two different patient populations with a degenerative condition in the cervical spine with a history of cervical radiculopathy referred to the outpatients' clinics of two neurosurgical departments in Germany and Norway. The survey consisted of seven questions: four questions about the respondents' gender and age, history of previous spine surgery and/or conservative treatment for cervical disorder and three questions regarding the importance of imaging in the decision-making process, patients' willingness to undergo cervical surgery based on imaging findings even with few or no symptoms and the effectiveness of surgical or conservative treatment. RESULTS Two hundred eleven patients answered the questionnaire. Sixty-seven percent of all patients with a degenerative cervical condition believe that results from MRI studies are more important than clinical findings. Forty-seven percent were willing to undergo surgery based on MRI showing abnormalities even without or having few symptoms. Fifty percent believe that surgery is more effective in the treatment of axial neck pain. CONCLUSION Misbeliefs and misconceptions exist concerning certain aspects of the diagnosis and management in patients with degenerative conditions in the cervical spine with a history of cervical radiculopathy in a large proportion of patients referred to neurosurgical outpatient clinics.
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Newton EH. Addressing overuse in emergency medicine: evidence of a role for greater patient engagement. Clin Exp Emerg Med 2017; 4:189-200. [PMID: 29306268 PMCID: PMC5758625 DOI: 10.15441/ceem.17.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Revised: 06/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/30/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Overuse of health care refers to tests, treatments, and even health care settings when used in circumstances where they are unlikely to help. Overuse is not only wasteful, it threatens patient safety by exposing patients to a greater chance of harm than benefit. It is a widespread problem and has proved resistant to change. Overuse of diagnostic testing is a particular problem in emergency medicine. Emergency physicians cite fear of missing a diagnosis, fear of law suits, and perceived patient expectations as key contributors. However, physicians' assumptions about what patients expect are often wrong, and overlook two of patients' most consistently voiced priorities: communication and empathy. Evidence indicates that patients who are more fully informed and engaged in their care often opt for less aggressive approaches. Shared decision making refers to (1) providing balanced information so that patients understand their options and the trade-offs involved, (2) encouraging them to voice their preferences and values, and (3) engaging them-to the extent appropriate or desired-in decision making. By adopting this approach to discretionary decision making, physicians are better positioned to address patients' concerns without the use of tests and treatments patients neither need nor value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika H. Newton
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Mangla M, Cha TD, Dorrwachter JM, Freiberg AA, Leavitt LJ, Rubash HE, Simmons LH, Wendell EL, Sepucha KR. Increasing the use of patient decision aids in orthopaedic care: results of a quality improvement project. BMJ Qual Saf 2017; 27:347-354. [DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
ObjectiveTo integrate patient decision aid (DA) delivery to promote shared decision-making and provide more patient-centred care within an orthopaedic surgery department for treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis, lumbar herniated disc and lumbar spinal stenosis.MethodsDifferent strategies were used across three distinct phases to promote DA delivery. First, we used a quality improvement bonus to generate awareness and interest in the DAs among specialists. Second, we adapted the electronic referral management system to enable DA orders at referral to a specialist. Third, we engaged clinic staff and specialists to design workflows that promoted DA delivery. We tracked the number of patients who received a DA, who ordered the DA, and collected usage data from a subset of patients. Our target was to reach 60% of patients with DAs.ResultsIn phase 1, 28% (43/155) of spine patients and 37% (114/308) of hip/knee patients received a DA. In phase 2, 54% (64/118) of spine referrals and 58% (189/324) of hip/knee referrals included a request to send a patient a DA. In phase 3, 56% (90/162) of spine patients and 69% (213/307) of hip/knee patients received a DA, significantly more than in phase 1 (P<0.0001). In phase 3, both more DAs were ordered by clinic staff compared with specialists (56% phase 3 vs 34% phase 1, P<0.001) and sent before the visit (74% phase 3 vs 17% phase 1, P<0.001). Patients were more likely to report reviewing the DA when delivered before the visit (63% before vs 50% after, P=0.005).ConclusionDA implementation into clinic workflow is possible and facilitated by engagement of the entire care team and the support of health information technology.
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Wilson TJ, Franz E, Vollmer CF, Chang KWC, Upadhyaya C, Park P, Yang LJS. Patient-perceived surgical indication influences patient expectations of surgery for degenerative spinal disease. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2017; 157:11-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2017] [Revised: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 03/11/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
|
38
|
Patient factors in decision-making for orthopaedic surgery: a prospective analysis. CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1097/bco.0000000000000499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
|
39
|
Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, Barry MJ, Bennett CL, Eden KB, Holmes‐Rovner M, Llewellyn‐Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4:CD001431. [PMID: 28402085 PMCID: PMC6478132 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1333] [Impact Index Per Article: 166.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decision aids are interventions that support patients by making their decisions explicit, providing information about options and associated benefits/harms, and helping clarify congruence between decisions and personal values. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of decision aids in people facing treatment or screening decisions. SEARCH METHODS Updated search (2012 to April 2015) in CENTRAL; MEDLINE; Embase; PsycINFO; and grey literature; includes CINAHL to September 2008. SELECTION CRITERIA We included published randomized controlled trials comparing decision aids to usual care and/or alternative interventions. For this update, we excluded studies comparing detailed versus simple decision aids. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently screened citations for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes, based on the International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS), were attributes related to the choice made and the decision-making process.Secondary outcomes were behavioural, health, and health system effects.We pooled results using mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs), applying a random-effects model. We conducted a subgroup analysis of studies that used the patient decision aid to prepare for the consultation and of those that used it in the consultation. We used GRADE to assess the strength of the evidence. MAIN RESULTS We included 105 studies involving 31,043 participants. This update added 18 studies and removed 28 previously included studies comparing detailed versus simple decision aids. During the 'Risk of bias' assessment, we rated two items (selective reporting and blinding of participants/personnel) as mostly unclear due to inadequate reporting. Twelve of 105 studies were at high risk of bias.With regard to the attributes of the choice made, decision aids increased participants' knowledge (MD 13.27/100; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.32 to 15.23; 52 studies; N = 13,316; high-quality evidence), accuracy of risk perceptions (RR 2.10; 95% CI 1.66 to 2.66; 17 studies; N = 5096; moderate-quality evidence), and congruency between informed values and care choices (RR 2.06; 95% CI 1.46 to 2.91; 10 studies; N = 4626; low-quality evidence) compared to usual care.Regarding attributes related to the decision-making process and compared to usual care, decision aids decreased decisional conflict related to feeling uninformed (MD -9.28/100; 95% CI -12.20 to -6.36; 27 studies; N = 5707; high-quality evidence), indecision about personal values (MD -8.81/100; 95% CI -11.99 to -5.63; 23 studies; N = 5068; high-quality evidence), and the proportion of people who were passive in decision making (RR 0.68; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.83; 16 studies; N = 3180; moderate-quality evidence).Decision aids reduced the proportion of undecided participants and appeared to have a positive effect on patient-clinician communication. Moreover, those exposed to a decision aid were either equally or more satisfied with their decision, the decision-making process, and/or the preparation for decision making compared to usual care.Decision aids also reduced the number of people choosing major elective invasive surgery in favour of more conservative options (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.75 to 1.00; 18 studies; N = 3844), but this reduction reached statistical significance only after removing the study on prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer gene carriers (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.97; 17 studies; N = 3108). Compared to usual care, decision aids reduced the number of people choosing prostate-specific antigen screening (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.98; 10 studies; N = 3996) and increased those choosing to start new medications for diabetes (RR 1.65; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.56; 4 studies; N = 447). For other testing and screening choices, mostly there were no differences between decision aids and usual care.The median effect of decision aids on length of consultation was 2.6 minutes longer (24 versus 21; 7.5% increase). The costs of the decision aid group were lower in two studies and similar to usual care in four studies. People receiving decision aids do not appear to differ from those receiving usual care in terms of anxiety, general health outcomes, and condition-specific health outcomes. Studies did not report adverse events associated with the use of decision aids.In subgroup analysis, we compared results for decision aids used in preparation for the consultation versus during the consultation, finding similar improvements in pooled analysis for knowledge and accurate risk perception. For other outcomes, we could not conduct formal subgroup analyses because there were too few studies in each subgroup. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Compared to usual care across a wide variety of decision contexts, people exposed to decision aids feel more knowledgeable, better informed, and clearer about their values, and they probably have a more active role in decision making and more accurate risk perceptions. There is growing evidence that decision aids may improve values-congruent choices. There are no adverse effects on health outcomes or satisfaction. New for this updated is evidence indicating improved knowledge and accurate risk perceptions when decision aids are used either within or in preparation for the consultation. Further research is needed on the effects on adherence with the chosen option, cost-effectiveness, and use with lower literacy populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dawn Stacey
- University of OttawaSchool of Nursing451 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanada
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteCentre for Practice Changing Research501 Smyth RdOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L6
| | - France Légaré
- CHU de Québec Research Center, Université LavalPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Axis10 Rue de l'Espinay, D6‐727Québec CityQCCanadaG1L 3L5
| | - Krystina Lewis
- University of OttawaSchool of Nursing451 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanada
| | | | - Carol L Bennett
- Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteClinical Epidemiology ProgramAdministrative Services Building, Room 2‐0131053 Carling AvenueOttawaONCanadaK1Y 4E9
| | - Karen B Eden
- Oregon Health Sciences UniversityDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical EpidemiologyBICC 5353181 S.W. Sam Jackson Park RoadPortlandOregonUSA97239‐3098
| | - Margaret Holmes‐Rovner
- Michigan State University College of Human MedicineCenter for Ethics and Humanities in the Life SciencesEast Fee Road956 Fee Road Rm C203East LansingMichiganUSA48824‐1316
| | - Hilary Llewellyn‐Thomas
- Dartmouth CollegeThe Dartmouth Center for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, The Geisel School of Medicine at DartmouthHanoverNew HampshireUSA03755
| | - Anne Lyddiatt
- No affiliation28 Greenwood RoadIngersollONCanadaN5C 3N1
| | - Richard Thomson
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietyBaddiley‐Clark BuildingRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- The University of SydneyRoom 322Edward Ford Building (A27)SydneyNSWAustralia2006
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Delgado-López PD, Rodríguez-Salazar A, Martín-Alonso J, Martín-Velasco V. [Lumbar disc herniation: Natural history, role of physical examination, timing of surgery, treatment options and conflicts of interests]. Neurocirugia (Astur) 2017; 28:124-134. [PMID: 28130015 DOI: 10.1016/j.neucir.2016.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Revised: 09/26/2016] [Accepted: 11/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Indication for surgery in lumbar disc herniation (LDH) varies widely depending on the geographical area. DEVELOPMENT A literature review is presented on the natural history, role of physical examination, timing of surgery, evidence-based treatment, and conflicts of interests in LDH. Surgery is shown to provide significant faster relief of pain compared to conservative therapy, although the effect fades after a year. There is no treatment modality better than the rest in terms of pain control and neurological recovery, nor is there a surgical technique clearly superior to simple discectomy. The lack of sound scientific evidence on the surgical indication may contribute to its great geographical variability. CONCLUSIONS Since LDH has a favourable natural history, neuroimaging and surgery should not be considered until after a 6-week period. It is necessary to specify and respect the surgical indications for LDH, avoiding conflicts of interests.
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Video-Assisted Informed Consent for Cataract Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017:9593631. [PMID: 28191349 PMCID: PMC5278206 DOI: 10.1155/2017/9593631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2016] [Accepted: 11/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose. To investigate whether adding video assistance to traditional verbal informed consent advisement improved satisfaction among cataract surgery patients. Methods. This trial enrolled 80 Chinese patients with age-related cataracts scheduled to undergo unilateral phacoemulsification surgery. Patients were randomized into two groups: the video group watched video explaining cataract-related consent information and rewatched specific segments of the video at their own discretion, before receiving traditional verbal consent advisement; the control group did not watch the video. Outcomes included patient satisfaction, refusal to consent, time to complete the consent process, and comprehension measured by a ten-item questionnaire. Results. All 80 enrolled patients signed informed consent forms. Compared with the control group, members of the video group exhibited greater satisfaction (65% versus 86%, p = 0.035) and required less time to complete the consent process (12.3 ± 6.7 min versus 5.6 ± 5.4 min, p < 0.001), while also evincing levels of comprehension commensurate with those reported for patients who did not watch the video (accuracy rate, 77.5% versus 80.2%, p = 0.386). Conclusion. The video-assisted informed consent process had a positive impact on patients' cataract surgery experiences. Additional research is needed to optimize patients' comprehension of the video.
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Gugliotta M, da Costa BR, Dabis E, Theiler R, Jüni P, Reichenbach S, Landolt H, Hasler P. Surgical versus conservative treatment for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012938. [PMID: 28003290 PMCID: PMC5223716 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Evidence comparing the effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation is controversial. We sought to compare short-term and long-term effectiveness of surgical and conservative treatment in sciatica symptom severity and quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation in a routine clinical setting. METHODS A prospective cohort study of a routine clinical practice registry consisting of 370 patients. Outcome measures were the North American Spine Society questionnaire and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey to assess patient-reported back pain, physical function, neurogenic symptoms and quality of life. Primary outcomes were back pain at 6 and 12 weeks. Standard open discectomy was assessed versus conservative interventions at 6, 12, 52 and 104 weeks. We filled in missing outcome variable values with multiple imputation, accounted for repeated measures within patients with mixed-effects models and adjusted baseline group differences in relevant prognostic indicators by inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS Surgical treatment patients reported less back pain at 6 weeks than those receiving conservative therapy (-0.97; 95% CI -1.89 to -0.09), were more likely to report ≥50% decrease in back pain symptoms from baseline to 6 weeks (48% vs 17%, risk difference: 0.34; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.47) and reported less physical function disability at 52 weeks (-3.7; 95% CI -7.4 to -0.1). The other assessments showed minimal between-group differences with CIs, including the null effect. CONCLUSIONS Compared with conservative therapy, surgical treatment provided faster relief from back pain symptoms in patients with lumbar disc herniation, but did not show a benefit over conservative treatment in midterm and long-term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bruno R da Costa
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Essam Dabis
- Department of Rheumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Robert Theiler
- Department of Rheumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
- Department of Rheumatology, Stadtspital Triemli, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Jüni
- Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephan Reichenbach
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hans Landolt
- Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Paul Hasler
- Department of Rheumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Response to the Letter to the Editor. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016; 41:E1071-E1073. [PMID: 27359357 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
|
44
|
Alpert JM, Krist AH, Aycock RA, Kreps GL. Applying Multiple Methods to Comprehensively Evaluate a Patient Portal's Effectiveness to Convey Information to Patients. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e112. [PMID: 27188953 PMCID: PMC4887660 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 04/18/2016] [Accepted: 04/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient portals have yet to achieve their full potential for enhancing health communication and improving health outcomes. Although the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in the United States mandates the utilization of patient portals, and usage continues to rise, their impact has not been as profound as anticipated. OBJECTIVE The objective of our case study was to evaluate how well portals convey information to patients. To demonstrate how multiple methodologies could be used to evaluate and improve the design of patient-centered portals, we conducted an in-depth evaluation of an exemplar patient-centered portal designed to promote preventive care to consumers. METHODS We used 31 critical incident patient interviews, 2 clinician focus groups, and a thematic content analysis to understand patients' and clinicians' perspectives, as well as theoretical understandings of the portal's use. RESULTS We gathered over 140 critical incidents, 71.8% (102/142) negative and 28.2% (40/142) positive. Positive incident categories were (1) instant medical information access, (2) clear health information, and (3) patient vigilance. Negative incident categories were (1) standardized content, (2) desire for direct communication, (3) website functionality, and (4) difficulty interpreting laboratory data. Thematic analysis of the portal's immediacy resulted in high scores in the attributes enhances understanding (18/23, 78%), personalization (18/24, 75%), and motivates behavior (17/24, 71%), but low levels of interactivity (7/24, 29%) and engagement (2/24, 8%). Two overarching themes emerged to guide portal refinements: (1) communication can be improved with directness and interactivity and (2) perceived personalization must be greater to engage patients. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that simple modifications, such as increased interactivity and personalized messages, can make portals customized, robust, easily accessible, and trusted information sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan M Alpert
- Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Brabers AEM, van Dijk L, Groenewegen PP, van Peperstraten AM, de Jong JD. Does a strategy to promote shared decision-making reduce medical practice variation in the choice of either single or double embryo transfer after in vitro fertilisation? A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e010894. [PMID: 27154481 PMCID: PMC4861095 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2015] [Revised: 03/29/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The hypothesis that shared decision-making (SDM) reduces medical practice variations is increasingly common, but no evidence is available. We aimed to elaborate further on this, and to perform a first exploratory analysis to examine this hypothesis. This analysis, based on a limited data set, examined how SDM is associated with variation in the choice of single embryo transfer (SET) or double embryo transfer (DET) after in vitro fertilisation (IVF). We examined variation between and within hospitals. DESIGN A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING 5 hospitals in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 222 couples (woman aged <40 years) on a waiting list for a first IVF cycle, who could choose between SET and DET (ie, ≥2 embryos available). INTERVENTION SDM via a multifaceted strategy aimed to empower couples in deciding how many embryos should be transferred. The strategy consisted of decision aid, support of IVF nurse and the offer of reimbursement for an extra treatment cycle. Control group received standard IVF care. OUTCOME MEASURE Difference in variation due to SDM in the choice of SET or DET, both between and within hospitals. RESULTS There was large variation in the choice of SET or DET between hospitals in the control group. Lower variation between hospitals was observed in the group with SDM. Within most hospitals, variation in the choice of SET or DET appeared to increase due to SDM. Variation particularly increased in hospitals where mainly DET was chosen in the control group. CONCLUSIONS Although based on a limited data set, our study gives a first insight that including patients' preferences through SDM results in less variation between hospitals, and indicates another pattern of variation within hospitals. Variation that results from patient preferences could be potentially named the informed patient rate. Our results provide the starting point for further research. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT00315029; Post-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E M Brabers
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liset van Dijk
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter P Groenewegen
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Sociology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Human Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Arno M van Peperstraten
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Judith D de Jong
- NIVEL, the Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A Deyo
- From the Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine, and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (R.A.D.); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH (S.K.M.)
| | - Sohail K Mirza
- From the Departments of Family Medicine, Medicine, and Public Health and Preventive Medicine, and the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland (R.A.D.); and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and the Dartmouth Institute, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, NH (S.K.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Boss EF, Mehta N, Nagarajan N, Links A, Benke JR, Berger Z, Espinel A, Meier J, Lipstein EA. Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154:405-20. [PMID: 26645531 PMCID: PMC4857133 DOI: 10.1177/0194599815620558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 163] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/12/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision making (SDM), an integrative patient-provider communication process emphasizing discussion of scientific evidence and patient/family values, may improve quality care delivery, promote evidence-based practice, and reduce overuse of surgical care. Little is known, however, regarding SDM in elective surgical practice. The purpose of this systematic review is to synthesize findings of studies evaluating use and outcomes of SDM in elective surgery. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, and SCOPUS electronic databases. REVIEW METHODS We searched for English-language studies (January 1, 1990, to August 9, 2015) evaluating use of SDM in elective surgical care where choice for surgery could be ascertained. Identified studies were independently screened by 2 reviewers in stages of title/abstract and full-text review. We abstracted data related to population, study design, clinical dilemma, use of SDM, outcomes, treatment choice, and bias. RESULTS Of 10,929 identified articles, 24 met inclusion criteria. The most common area studied was spine (7 of 24), followed by joint (5 of 24) and gynecologic surgery (4 of 24). Twenty studies used decision aids or support tools, including modalities that were multimedia/video (13 of 20), written (3 of 20), or personal coaching (4 of 20). Effect of SDM on preference for surgery was mixed across studies, showing a decrease in surgery (9 of 24), no difference (8 of 24), or an increase (1 of 24). SDM tended to improve decision quality (3 of 3) as well as knowledge or preparation (4 of 6) while decreasing decision conflict (4 of 6). CONCLUSION SDM reduces decision conflict and improves decision quality for patients making choices about elective surgery. While net findings show that SDM may influence patients to choose surgery less often, the impact of SDM on surgical utilization cannot be clearly ascertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Boss
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Nishchay Mehta
- evidENT, Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK
| | - Neeraja Nagarajan
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Anne Links
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - James R Benke
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Zackary Berger
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health; Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Ali Espinel
- Department of Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Jeremy Meier
- Department of Otolaryngology, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Ellen A Lipstein
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Syrowatka A, Krömker D, Meguerditchian AN, Tamblyn R. Features of Computer-Based Decision Aids: Systematic Review, Thematic Synthesis, and Meta-Analyses. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18:e20. [PMID: 26813512 PMCID: PMC4748141 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2015] [Revised: 11/01/2015] [Accepted: 12/21/2015] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient information and education, such as decision aids, are gradually moving toward online, computer-based environments. Considerable research has been conducted to guide content and presentation of decision aids. However, given the relatively new shift to computer-based support, little attention has been given to how multimedia and interactivity can improve upon paper-based decision aids. Objective The first objective of this review was to summarize published literature into a proposed classification of features that have been integrated into computer-based decision aids. Building on this classification, the second objective was to assess whether integration of specific features was associated with higher-quality decision making. Methods Relevant studies were located by searching MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and CENTRAL databases. The review identified studies that evaluated computer-based decision aids for adults faced with preference-sensitive medical decisions and reported quality of decision-making outcomes. A thematic synthesis was conducted to develop the classification of features. Subsequently, meta-analyses were conducted based on standardized mean differences (SMD) from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported knowledge or decisional conflict. Further subgroup analyses compared pooled SMDs for decision aids that incorporated a specific feature to other computer-based decision aids that did not incorporate the feature, to assess whether specific features improved quality of decision making. Results Of 3541 unique publications, 58 studies met the target criteria and were included in the thematic synthesis. The synthesis identified six features: content control, tailoring, patient narratives, explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. A subset of 26 RCTs from the thematic synthesis was used to conduct the meta-analyses. As expected, computer-based decision aids performed better than usual care or alternative aids; however, some features performed better than others. Integration of content control improved quality of decision making (SMD 0.59 vs 0.23 for knowledge; SMD 0.39 vs 0.29 for decisional conflict). In contrast, tailoring reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.40 vs 0.71 for knowledge; SMD 0.25 vs 0.52 for decisional conflict). Similarly, patient narratives also reduced quality of decision making (SMD 0.43 vs 0.65 for knowledge; SMD 0.17 vs 0.46 for decisional conflict). Results were varied for different types of explicit values clarification, feedback, and social support. Conclusions Integration of media rich or interactive features into computer-based decision aids can improve quality of preference-sensitive decision making. However, this is an emerging field with limited evidence to guide use. The systematic review and thematic synthesis identified features that have been integrated into available computer-based decision aids, in an effort to facilitate reporting of these features and to promote integration of such features into decision aids. The meta-analyses and associated subgroup analyses provide preliminary evidence to support integration of specific features into future decision aids. Further research can focus on clarifying independent contributions of specific features through experimental designs and refining the designs of features to improve effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ania Syrowatka
- Clinical and Health Informatics Research Group, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Haig AJ. Controlling the Midfield: Treating Patients With Chronic Pain Using Alternative Payment Models. PM R 2015; 7:S248-S256. [PMID: 26568504 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Revised: 08/13/2015] [Accepted: 08/15/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The entire American health care system is turning upside down, except for the parts that aren't--yet. For physiatrists who manage pain problems, the future is complex. The usual challenge of treating these devastating and costly problems that cannot be measured physiologically is compounded by the requirement to do so in a health care system that doesn't know what it wants to be yet. Payment, regulation, and the very structure of practice are changing at a pace that is halting and unpredictable. Nonetheless, knowledge about some structures is necessary, and some themes almost certainly emerge. I propose that the role of the pain physiatrist is best understood through a soccer analogy. Whereas the casual spectator of the past might note the goals scored by surgical colleagues and shots missed by primary care partners, sophisticated health care systems of the future will learn that the pain game is won by creating a strong physiatry midfield. Physiatrists can reach to the backfield to help primary care with tough cases, send accurate referrals to surgeons, and reorganize the team when chronic pain complicates the situation. Current and emerging payment structures include insurance from government, employers, or individuals. Although the rules may change, certain trends appear to occur: Individuals will be making more choices, deductibles will increase, narrow groups of practitioners will work together, pricing will become important, and the burden on primary care colleagues will increase. Implications of each of these trends on pain medicine and specific strategy examples are addressed. A general concept emerges that, although procedure- and activity-based practice is still important, pain physiatrists can best prepare for the future by leading programs that create value for their health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J Haig
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, 325 E Eisenhower, Ann Arbor, MI 48103.,E-Health Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.,Haig et al., Consulting, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Educational Resources “Over the Head” of Neurosurgical Patients: The Economic Impact of Inadequate Health Literacy. World Neurosurg 2015; 84:1223-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2015] [Revised: 06/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/13/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|