Accurate assessment of knee alignment in pre- and post-operative radiographs is crucial for knee arthroplasty planning and evaluation. Current methods rely on manual alignment assessment, which is time-consuming and error-prone. This study proposes a machine learning-based approach to fully automatically measure anatomical varus/valgus alignment in standard anteroposterior (AP) knee radiographs.

We collected a training dataset of 566 pre-operative and 457 one-year post-operative AP knee radiographs from total knee arthroplasty patients, along with a separate test set of 376 patients. The distal femur and proximal tibia/fibula were manually outlined using points to capture the knee joint. The outlines were used to develop an automatic system to locate the points. The anatomical femorotibial angle was calculated using the points, with varus/valgus defined as negative/positive deviations from zero. Fifty test images were clinically measured on two occasions by an orthopaedic surgeon. Agreement between points-based manual, automatic, and clinical measurements was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute difference (MAD) and Bland-Altman analysis.

The agreement between automatic and manual measurements was excellent pre-/post-operatively with ICC 0.98/0.96 and MAD 0.8°/0.7°. The agreement between automatic and clinical measurements was excellent pre-operatively (ICC: 0.97; MAD: 1.2°) but lacked performance post-operatively (ICC: 0.78; MAD: 1.5°). The clinical intra-observer agreement was excellent pre-/post-operatively with ICC 0.99/0.95 and MAD 0.9°/0.8°.

The developed system demonstrates high reliability in automatically measuring varus/valgus alignment pre- and post-operatively, and shows excellent agreement with clinical measurements pre-operatively. It provides a promising approach for automating the measurement of anatomical alignment.

Component alignment is a key factor influencing clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous studies have shown that single-plane alignment can significantly affect knee joint kinematics and biomechanics. However, the comprehensive impact of multiplanar malalignment has been rarely investigated.

This study aimed to investigate the influence of the multiplanar malalignment combination on the polyethylene tibial liners under gait loading, a primary activity of daily life, as well as the degree of the influence of the alignments on the different planes.

A validated finite element model of a cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis under gait loading was used in this study. Five alignment parameters (-5°, -3°, 0°, 3°, 5°) on each plane (coronal, sagittal, and transverse) were selected to simulate clinical alignment errors, resulting in 125 models combining various alignment errors across the three planes. Boundary and loading conditions were set according to ISO 14243-3:2014. The maximum von Mises stress and contact stress during a gait cycle were recorded for statistical analysis. A polynomial model was used for regression analysis, with the degree of influence of each alignment error on von Mises and contact stress determined by examining the quadratic coefficients.

The highest Mises and contact stress values occurred with alignment errors of 5° varus, 5° flexion, and 5° internal rotation on the coronal, sagittal, and transverse planes, respectively. The lowest stress values were observed with a combination of 3° valgus, 5° flexion, and 0° internal rotation. The regression analysis yielded an R2 value of 0.69 between alignment errors and Mises stress, with quadratic coefficients of 0.096, 0.013, and 0.064 for the coronal, sagittal, and transverse alignments, respectively. For contact stress, the R2 was 0.697, with quadratic coefficients of 0.083, 0.002, and 0.026 for the coronal, sagittal, and transverse alignments, respectively.

The coronal alignment of the lower limb has the most significant impact on both Mises stress and contact stress of the tibial liner, followed by the rotational alignment of the tibial component. In contrast, the sagittal alignment of the femoral component has the least influence.

Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCWDFO) is an effective procedure mainly indicated for correction of the valgus malaligned native knee. Nevertheless, valgus malalignment has been reported following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Therefore, employing a realignment osteotomy for a symptomatic valgus malaligned TKA could be a potential rescue from an unnecessary revision surgery with high morbidity and mortality and uncertain outcome.

The following report describes 3 consecutive cases presented with symptomatic valgus malalignment following primary TKA. The 3 cases were treated with MCWDFO to improve the overall limb alignment and biomechanics. Preoperative and postoperative alignment indices were recorded from long leg standing radiographs (LSRs). Patient reported outcome measures, assessed by simple knee value (SKV) scores, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and patient satisfaction were reported preoperatively and postoperatively at the latest follow up.

Postoperatively, the overall limb alignment has been corrected as represented by the mechanical tibiofemoral angle and Mikulicz line. No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. At the final follow up (8 years for two cases and 2 years for one case), significant improvements in patient reported outcome measures, as assessed by the simple knee value and VAS pain scores and 100% satisfaction, were observed.

Medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy can be employed in rescue realignment of valgus malalignment post primary TKA with resultant significant improvement in patient reported outcome measures, and 100% satisfaction with no complications in a small series.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alters the lower extremity alignment, potentially affecting adjacent joints such as the ankle and subtalar joints. However, the relationship between changes in hindfoot alignment and ankle osteoarthritis (OA) after TKA remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether ankle and subtalar alignment normalizes after TKA and to identify factors associated with persistent malalignment.

We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients who underwent unilateral mechanical alignment (MA) TKA for knee osteoarthritis. A control group of 40 healthy subjects was used to define normal alignment ranges. Whole-leg anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. Alignment parameters included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibiotalar tilt angle (TTA), tibial plafond inclination angle (TPIA), talar inclination angle (TIA), and hindfoot alignment angle (HAA). Pre- and postoperative values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and changes in the proportion of patients within the normal range were determined. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and chi-squared tests were used for group comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of persistent malalignment.

HKA improved after TKA (-12° to -2.0°), with corresponding improvements in TPIA (99° to 94°) and TIA (99° to 95°) (all p < 0.001), indicating a significant correction toward neutral alignment. The proportion of patients within normal range increased postoperatively from 16% to 85% for HKA, 26% to 67% for TPIA, 24% to 64% for TIA, and 65% to 73% for HAA. Multivariate analysis identified ankle OA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.62 for TTA), female sex (OR = 2.32 for TPIA; OR = 3.19 for TIA), and varus knee alignment (OR = 2.81 for TIA) as independent predictors of persistent malalignment.

MA-TKA facilitates partial normalization of coronal hindfoot alignment, particularly at the tibial plafond and talus. However, female sex, varus knee deformity, and pre-existing ankle OA independently limit full correction. These findings highlight the biomechanical interdependence between the knee and hindfoot and may guide surgical decision-making and patient-specific alignment strategies.

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) and malalignment of the lower extremity can lead to pain and increased risk of osteoarthritis. Radiographic measurements on anteroposterior (AP) full-length radiographs can be used to assess LLD and lower extremity alignment. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of AI software in performing lower extremity radiographic measurements in patients with implants. The secondary aim was to compare its efficiency to that of radiologists.

This study used the following eight angles and five lengths: hip-knee-angle (HKA), anatomical-tibiofemoral angle (aTFA), anatomical-mechanical-axis angle (AMA), joint-line-convergence angle (JLCA), mechanical-lateral-proximal-femur-angle (mLPFA), mechanical-lateral-distal-femur-angle (mLDFA), mechanical-medial-proximal-tibia-angle (mMPTA), mechanical-lateral-distal-tibia- angle (mLDTA), femur length, tibia length, full leg length, leg-length-discrepancy (LLD), and mechanical-axis-deviation (MAD). Two radiologists and AI software independently performed these measurements on 156 legs. The statistical methods used to assess AI performance were intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis.

The AI generated output for 129/156 legs. 11/13 of the variables showed excellent agreement (ICC ≥ 0.75) between AI and the readers. Bland Altman performance targets were met for 5/13 variables. The mean (standard deviation) reading time for the AI and two readers, respectively, was 38 (6) seconds, 181 (41) seconds, and 214 (77) seconds.

In a cohort with lower extremity metal implants, AI-based leg length measurements were fast and accurate although most angular measurements were not.

During kinematically aligned (KA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the surgeon may need to rectify an over-resection of the medial, lateral or posterior tibia. This study tested the hypothesis that a bone graft taken from the tibial resection or patella and impacted beneath a tibial baseplate would heal, regardless of whether the tibial component and knee were in outlier ranges according to mechanical alignment (MA) criteria. The study also tested the hypothesis that the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) would improve beyond the substantial clinical benefit and that the source and thickness of the bone graft would not influence their improvement.

This retrospective study radiographically assessed the healing of a bone graft from the tibial resection (n = 19) or patella (n = 10) in 29 KA TKAs (18 females, mean age 65 years). The tibial component and knee alignment were categorized as in-range or outliers based on reported MA criteria for bone graft healing and implant survival. The one-sample t test identified differences in the improvement of the OKS and KOOS JR from their reported substantial clinical benefit of 16 and 20 points, respectively.

At an average follow-up of 37 months, all bone grafts healed even though ≥55% of tibial components and 34% of knees were varus outliers according to MA criteria for bone healing and implant survival. Amongst the 29 patients, the mean OKS and KOOS JR improvements of 25 ± 11 and 47 ± 21 points, respectively, surpassed the threshold of their respective substantial clinical benefit (p < 0.01) and were not influenced by the bone graft's source and thickness (p ≥ 0.51).

During cemented KA TKA, the surgeon can use a bone graft from the tibial resection or patella to rectify a tibial over-resection. This technique led to consistent bone healing and improved outcome scores.

Level IV.

Alternative strategies in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have been developed to obtain improved outcomes utilizing implant realignment and positioning to balance the soft tissues while accepting a nonneutral mechanical alignment. The purpose of our study was to compare 2-year outcomes of a matched set of TKAs with soft-tissue gaps either "functional" balanced via robotic-arm-assisted changes to implant position and alignment prior to bone cuts (R-TKA) or manual instrument-adjusted mechanical alignment (M-TKA). We hypothesized that the R-TKA cohort would have superior patient outcomes.

A consecutive series of 210 TKAs matched 2:1 by selecting patients in each cohort with no statistically significant preoperative differences in sex, age, American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification system score, Knee Society knee scores (KS-KS) and Knee Society function scores (KS-FS), range of flexion (ROF), and knee coronal alignment. There were 140 R-TKA and 70 M-TKA with the same implants that were reviewed. Tibial pressure sensors were used in all cases to verify balance. Postoperative KS-KS, KS-FS, and ROF were compared at 3 months and 2 years, and Forgotten Joint Scores (FJS) were obtained at 2 years.

Both groups achieved equivalent quantitative balance with the pressure sensors. The functional alignment-balanced R-TKA cohort had more component realignments (100 versus 35.7%), fewer soft-tissue releases (40 versus 61.4%), and statistically significant higher mean KS-KS, KS-FS, and ROF at 3 months and 2 years than the M-TKA group. The mean FJS was higher in the R-TKA group (66.3 versus 60.4), but this did not represent a statistical significance.

A functional alignment balancing technique using robotic-arm assistance resulted in fewer soft-tissue releases and higher Knee Society outcome scores and knee flexion than with M-TKA at 3 months and 2 years, despite equivalent soft-tissue balance per the pressure sensors. The mean FJS at 2 years was greater, but not statistically significant.

Background/Objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold-standard treatment for advanced knee arthritis, offering pain relief and improved joint function. However, tibial component malalignment, malrotation, and improper biomechanical loading remain critical factors contributing to implant failure, instability, and revision surgeries. This review systematically examines the impact of biomechanical loading on the tibial insert following primary TKA, with a focus on alignment, posterior tibial slope (PTS), and load distribution. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating the effects of tibial component alignment, varus/valgus deviations, PTS, and load distribution on tibial inserts post-TKA were included. Seven studies meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed and described narratively. Results: The reviewed studies highlighted that varus and valgus malalignment significantly alter tibiofemoral contact pressures and ligament strains, increasing the risk of aseptic loosening and implant failure. Excessive PTS was associated with posterior femoral translation, altered ligament tension, and increased contact stresses on polyethylene (PE) inserts. Kinematically aligned TKA demonstrated reduced tibial force imbalances and improved functional outcomes compared to mechanically aligned TKA. Computational and cadaveric studies revealed that even minor malalignments (e.g., 3° varus or valgus) can cause significant biomechanical changes. Conclusions: Biomechanical loading on tibial inserts after primary TKA is highly sensitive to the alignment and PTS. Optimal alignment and controlled biomechanical forces are essential. Kinematically aligned TKA has shown promising effects, preventing aseptic loosening and ensuring long-term implant survival. Further in vivo studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize surgical techniques.

Optimal implant position and alignment remains a controversial, yet critical topic in primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Future study of ideal implant position will require the ability to efficiently measure component positions at scale. Previous algorithms have limited accuracy, do not allow for human oversight and correction in deployment, and require extensive training time and dataset. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a machine learning model that can accurately automate, with surgeon directed adjustment, implant position annotation.

A retrospective series of 295 primary TKAs was identified. The femoral-tibial angle (FTA), distal femoral angle (dFA), and proximal tibial angle (pTA) were manually annotated from the immediate short leg post-op radiograph. We then trained a neural network to predict each annotated landmark using a novel label augmentation procedure of dilation, reweighting, and scheduled erosion steps. The model was compared against diverse models and accuracy was assessed using a validation set of 43 patients and test set of 79 patients.

Our proposed model significantly improves accuracy compared to baseline training models across all measures in ten out of eleven cases (p < 1e-22 for each measure). The mean absolute error (difference from manual annotation) was 0.65° for FTA, 1.62° for dFA, and 1.44° for pTA.

Utilizing a novel algorithm, trained on a limited dataset, the accuracy of component position was approximately 1.2°. Additionally, the model outputs adjustable points from which the angles are calculated, allowing for clinician oversight and interpretable diagnostics for failure cases.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the balance in extension and flexion achievable after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using a modified kinematic alignment (KA) plan and the subsequent balance achievable after adjusting the component based on the functional alignment (FA) principle. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA for knee osteoarthritis through an image-based robotic system in a single center between October 2021 and February 2022. Whether modified KA or FA could achieve a balanced knee was evaluated by assessing the ligament balance in the medial and lateral compartments using a robotic system at extension and 90° flexion. Balance was defined as a difference of ≤2 mm between the compartments. Component positioning was adjusted within limits based on the functional positioning principles to achieve balance. Implant positioning and balance in extension and 90° flexion were compared between the modified KA plan (n = 100) and after FA adjustments (n = 100). Results: FA achieved significantly better balance in extension (FA, 99.0% vs. modified KA, 86.0%; p = 0.001) and flexion (98.0% vs. 43.0%; p < 0.001) than the modified KA plan. The mean difference in gap balance in extension (FA, 0.1 mm vs. modified KA, 0.6 mm; p = 0.001) and flexion (0.1 mm vs. 2.3 mm; p < 0.001) was also significant between the two techniques. The femoral component was positioned more externally rotated relative to the transepicondylar axis (FA, 2.5° vs. modified KA, 0.0°; p < 0.001) to obtain balanced targets. There were significant improvements in the patient-reported outcome measures between preoperative and postoperative assessments two years after TKA (all p < 0.05). Conclusions: FA consistently achieved superior balance in both extension and flexion following TKA compared with modified KA without altering the soft tissue envelope, leading to significant improvements in clinical outcomes at the two-year follow-up.

After total knee arthroplasty (TKA), dissatisfaction rates are described up to 30 %. Optimal alignment of the prosthesis in TKA is believed to improve clinical outcome and survival rates. Radiological outliers after TKA are used to define this alignment. Limited evidence is available on the cumulative effect of these outliers on survival or clinical outcome. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the amount of postoperative femoral and/or tibial radiological outliers, measured in different planes, influences the survival and clinical outcome after TKA.

Prospective data were used from a previously published randomized trial, with a mean follow-up of 5-years after surgery. Data of 168 patients who received TKA were assessed. Patients were divided into four groups: 0, 1, 2 or ≥3 postoperative radiological outliers of the femoral and/or tibial component in different planes (e.g. frontal, sagittal). Revision rates were analysed and clinical outcome was assessed using PROMs. The study used a general linear model for repeated measures to compare the difference of each questionnaire over time between the groups.

No statistically significant differences were found between patients with 0, 1, 2 or ≥3 outliers regarding improvement of postoperative PROMs. Data was underpowered to detect a possible relationship between the number of outliers and the survival of the prosthesis.

The number of postoperative radiological outliers did not influence clinical outcome after TKA. High-powered studies are needed to examine the influence of these outliers on survival rates.

This study aimed to investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between anatomical alignment and mechanical alignment in each knee, respectively, in patients who underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty.

Bilateral simultaneous total knee arthroplasty using a posterior-stabilized prosthesis was performed between June 2016 and May 2018, with one knee undergoing anatomical alignment and the contralateral knee undergoing mechanical alignment, which was randomized. There were 80 knees in 40 patients (mean age 75 years, range 60 to 87, with 4 men and 36 women) followed up for at least 2 years (mean follow-up 4.9 years, range 2 to 7 years). On the anatomical side, the distal femoral cut was set 2° more valgus to the mechanical axis, and the tibial cut was set to 2 or 3° varus using a specific guide. Implant position and lower extremity alignment were measured using postoperative radiographs and computed tomography images. The range of motion before and after surgery, Knee Society score, patient satisfaction, postoperative 2011 Knee Society questionnaire, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores were evaluated.

A significant difference was observed in joint line orientation (0.6 versus 2.9°, P < .001), but not in the postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle between 2 groups. There was one knee in the mechanical alignment group that required revision surgery at 5 years due to implant loosening. Before surgery, the anatomical alignment group had a significantly lower knee extension angle (-7.2 versus -6.0°, P = .035) and Knee Society Score (46.1 versus 49.1, P = .046). No significant difference was observed between the groups except for the 2011 Knee Society Questionnaire satisfaction scores (26.7 versus 25.7, P = .035). More participants preferred the anatomical alignment side postoperatively.

Anatomical and mechanical alignments had similar clinical outcomes in patients undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty at a mean of 4.9 years follow-up.

Level Ⅰ (Randomized control study).

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains challenging in severe varus knees. We evaluated the impact of hip-knee-ankle varus deformity and osteophyte size on achieving restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in robotic-arm-assisted TKA.

This retrospective study included 244 knees (194 patients) that underwent robotic-arm-assisted TKA for varus primary knee osteoarthritis at an academic institution. Intraoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and soft tissue balance were monitored to assess the success of rKA with osteophyte resection alone. For those that failed, medial collateral ligament needle pie-crusting was performed.

Mean age was 65.3 years (range, 48-83). Mean preoperative HKA was 11.9° varus (range, 1.0°-32.0°), and HKA after osteophyte resection was 5.1° varus (range, 0°-19.0°). Mean HKA correction was 6.8° (range, 0°-18.0°). rKA was achieved in 36.9% at a boundary of ≤3° varus and up to 72.1% at ≤6° varus. Preoperative varus HKA was lower in successful cases across all target alignments (P < .05). Medial tibial osteophyte size was 6.1% ± 2.9% and was smaller in all groups that achieved rKA (P < .05). Both were positively correlated with degree of deformity correction, r = 0.718 (P < .01) and r = 0.281 (P < .01), respectively.

This study highlighted the importance of varus deformity and medial tibial osteophytes when adopting rKA. They were associated with increased failure to achieve rKA. rKA was reliably achieved in minimal varus deformities (HKA ≤ 5°), we recommend an expanded protocol of HKA ≤ 6° varus for mild deformities (HKA 6°-10°), and consider medial soft tissue release for moderate (HKA 11°-15°) and severe deformities (HKA ≥ 16°).

Patient dissatisfaction rates following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) reported in the literature reach 20%. The optimal coronal alignment is still under debate. The aim of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes in different coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) phenotypes undergoing mechanically aligned (MA) TKA. The hypothesis was that knees with preoperative varus arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) would achieve inferior clinical outcomes after surgery compared to other aHKA categories. Additionally, another objective was to assess CPAK phenotypes distribution in the study population.

A retrospective selection was made of 180 patients who underwent MA TKA from April 2021 to December 2022, with a 1-year follow-up. Coronal knee alignment was classified according to the CPAK classification. Clinical outcome evaluations were measured using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Short Form Survey 12 and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS). Differences in clinical outcomes were considered statistically significant with a p value <0 .05.

Patients with varus aHKA achieved significantly inferior outcomes at final follow-up compared to other aHKA categories in KSS pt. 1 (79.7 ± 17.2 vs. 85.6 ± 14.7; p = 0.028), OKS (39.2 ± 9.2 vs. 42.2 ± 7.2; p = 0.019) and FJS (75.4 ± 31.0 vs. 87.4 ± 22.9; p =0 .003). The most common aHKA category was the varus category (39%). The most common CPAK phenotypes were apex distal Types I (23.9%), II (22.8%) and III (13.3%).

MA TKA does not yield uniform outcomes across all CPAK phenotypes. Varus aHKA category shows significantly inferior results at final follow-up. The most prevalent CPAK categories are varus aHKA and apex distal JLO, with phenotypes I, II and III being the most common. However, their gender distribution varies significantly.

Level IV.

As advancements in total knee arthroplasty progress at an exciting pace, two areas are of special interest, as they directly impact implant design and surgical decision making. Knee morphometry considers the three-dimensional shape of the articulating surfaces within the knee joint, and knee phenotyping provides the ability to categorize alignment into practical groupings that can be used in both clinical and research settings. This annotation discusses the details of these concepts, and the ways in which they are helping us better understand the individual subtleties of each patient's knee.

Whether the longevity of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) differs between postoperative phenotypes has not been investigated. This study aims to examine which phenotype has a worse long-term survival rate than the reference phenotype (neutral alignment-parallel joint line), and whether joint-line obliquity (JLO) affects the survivorship of TKA.

A total of 945 knees that underwent primary TKAs for primary osteoarthritis from January 2000 to January 2009 were included. These were classified into nine postoperative phenotypes based on the combined assessment of the hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and JLO, measured on standing radiographs. The 5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates were analysed using Kaplan-Meier methods and log-rank tests. The long-term survival rates of each phenotype were compared with the reference phenotype.

There were 55 aseptic mechanical failures within a period of 10.4 ± 5.0 years. The most frequently observed phenotypes were the reference phenotype (n = 527), neutral alignment-lateral joint-line inclination (n = 162), varus alignment-lateral joint-line inclination (n = 104) and varus alignment-parallel joint line (n = 101). The overall failure rate for each phenotype was 3.6%, 3.7%, 18.3% and 7.9%, respectively. Only the 10- and 15-year survival rates of the varus alignment-lateral joint-line inclination phenotype were significantly different from those of the reference phenotype (97%-93% vs. 90%-69%; p = 0.017, <0.001).

The lateral joint-line inclination phenotype had an inferior long-term survival rate after varus-aligned TKA. This suggested that alignment and JLO affected the long-term survival rate of patients who underwent TKA.

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Objective: This study investigates the impact of age and knee osteoarthritis (OA) on the coronal plane alignment of the lower extremity in Japanese males and females, utilizing the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification system. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 150 male and 150 female patients. Participants were divided into three groups according to age and OA progression. The mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA) and mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA) were measured using standard digital long-leg radiographs. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and joint line obliquity (JLO) were calculated, and the CPAK classification was performed to verify the distribution among the three groups. Results: The results showed increased varus alignment of the mean mLDFA correlated with OA in both genders and with aging in males. The mean mMPTA did not change in males but shifted toward varus in females with both aging and OA. Both genders demonstrated a constitutional varus alignment with the progression of osteoarthritis (males: 1.3 ± 2.4° to -3.5 ± 3.7°, p < 0.001; females: -1.2 ± 3.2° to -3.6 ± 2.9°, p < 0.001). However, this trend with aging was observed only in females (0.0 ± 2.5° to -1.2 ± 3.2°, p = 0.018). JLO maintained its apex distal position with aging and OA progression in all subjects. The study further revealed a notable transition from CPAK Type II to Type I with OA progression in both genders, additionally influenced by aging in females. Conclusions: Aging affects coronal alignment and CPAK classification differently across genders. With OA progression, there was a shift toward smaller aHKA, while JLO remained unchanged. Compared to other races, young Japanese people exhibit similar CPAK distributions, but distinct differences appear in OA-affected individuals, highlighting potential racial variations in CPAK classifications.

Achieving optimal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a critical factor in ensuring optimal outcomes and long-term implant survival. Traditionally, mechanical alignment has been favored to achieve neutral post-operative joint alignment. However, contemporary approaches, such as kinematic alignments and hybrid techniques including adjusted mechanical, restricted kinematic, inverse kinematic, and functional alignments, are gaining attention for their ability to restore native joint kinematics and anatomical alignment, potentially leading to enhanced functional outcomes and greater patient satisfaction. The ongoing debate on optimal alignment strategies considers the following factors: long-term implant durability, functional improvement, and resolution of individual anatomical variations. Furthermore, advancements of computer-navigated and robotic-assisted surgery have augmented the precision in implant positioning and objective measurements of soft tissue balance. Despite ongoing debates on balancing implant longevity and functional outcomes, there is an increasing advocacy for personalized alignment strategies that are tailored to individual anatomical variations. This review evaluates the spectrum of various alignment techniques in TKA, including mechanical alignment, patient-specific kinematic approaches, and emerging hybrid methods. Each technique is scrutinized based on its fundamental principles, procedural techniques, inherent advantages, and potential limitations, while identifying significant clinical gaps that underscore the need for further investigation.

The use of alternative alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has recently been increasing in popularity: many of these alignments have been included in the broad spectrum of "kinematic alignment." This alternative approach was recommended to increase patients' satisfaction since many studies based on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) showed that every fifth patient is not satisfied with the surgical outcome. In fact, the original kinematic alignment technique was designed as a "pure resurfacing" technique, maintaining the preoperative axes (flexion-extension and axial rotation) of the knee. In adjunct, many new classifications of the preoperative limb deformity have been proposed to include a large range of knee anatomies, few of them very atypical. Following those classifications, many surgeons aimed for a reproduction of unusual anatomies putting in jeopardy the survivorship of the implant according to the classical "dogma" of a poor knee kinematics and TKA biomechanics if the final hip-knee-ankle (HKA) axis was not kept within 5 degrees from neutral. This article reviews the literature supporting the choice of setting alignment boundaries in TKA when surgeons are interested in reproducing the constitutional knee anatomy of the patient within a safe range.

The importance of proper prosthetic placement has been confirmed in numerous studies. The objective of this study was to compare the planned resection angles to the verified intraoperative angles of femoral and tibial varus/valgus, tibial slope, and femoral flexion for each total knee performed using intramedullary (IM) cut guides for both distal femur and proximal tibia cuts. A total of 1,000 total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) were evaluated for this study. Intraoperative cut-check technology was used to show real-time validation of these resection angles. Assuming an acceptable range of within 2° of the planned cuts, results show the femoral varus/valgus angles were 75% accurate, the femoral flexion angles were 50.8% accurate, the tibial cuts were 95.2% accurate in the coronal plane, and the tibial slope was the least accurate with only 50.3% within the acceptable range. This showed that IM guides are reasonably accurate in producing desired angles in the coronal plane but less accurate in the sagittal plane, with a greater number of outliers in femoral flexion and posterior slope. Surgeons need to be aware of potential cutting errors when using IM guides as they affect the overall alignment of the implant, and real-time verification technology is available to verify the accuracy of the cuts.

More personalized alignment techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have recently been described particularly for the young and active patients. Performing the ideal tibial cut might be challenging with a conventional ancillary. Therefore the aims of this study were: (1) to describe specific tibial landmarks to optimize the tibial cut in TKA; (2) to compare the accuracy of the tibial cut with these landmarks compared to a conventional technique.

This retrospective case-control study compared primary TKAs performed using a conventional technique with extramedullary guide associated with specific tibial landmarks. For each case, one control patient was matched based on body mass index (BMI), age, preoperative Hip Knee Ankle (HKA) angle, and Medial Proximal Tibial Angle (MPTA). All control patients were operated by the same surgeon and similar conventional technique but without landmarks. The MPTA target was to reproduce preoperative deformity with a 3° of varus limit. 34 TKA were included in each group. There was no preoperative difference between both groups. Mean age was 63 years old ± 8. Mean BMI was 32 kg/m2 ± 5. Mean HKA was 170.6° ± 2.5. Mean MPTA was 85.1° ± 2.3. The radiographic assessment was performed preoperatively and at 2 months: HKA, mechanical Medial Distal Femoral Angle (mMDFA), MPTA, tibial slope, restoration of the joint line-height.

The tibial landmarks corresponded to the line of insertion of the deep medial collateral ligament fibers extended to the capsular insertion above the Gerdy tubercle. The postoperative MPTA was significantly more varus (87.2° ± 1.6 in landmark group versus 88.3° ± 2.2; p = 0.027) and closer to preoperative bone deformity in landmark group (p = 0.002) with significantly less outliers than in the conventional group. There was no significant difference between both groups postoperatively for HKA (175.4° ± 2.3 versus 175.9° ± 2.5; p = 0.42); mMDFA (88.9° ± 2.3 versus 88.2° ± 2.1; p = 0.18); tibial slope (82.6° ± 1.9 versus 82.4° ± 2.6; p = 0.67), the restoration of the joint line-height (1.5 mm ± 2 versus 1.8 mm ± 2; p = 0.56).

Specific tibial landmarks during TKA can be used to increase the accuracy of the tibial cut when using personalized alignment techniques in TKA.

IV.

Sagittal plane imbalance (SPI), or asymmetry between extension and flexion gaps, is an important issue in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare SPI between kinematic alignment (KA), mechanical alignment (MA), and functional alignment (FA) strategies.

In 137 robotic-assisted TKAs, extension and flexion stressed gap laxities and bone resections were measured. The primary outcome was the proportion and magnitude of medial and lateral SPI (gap differential > 2.0 mm) for KA, MA, and FA. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of knees with severe (> 4.0 mm) SPI, and resection thicknesses for each technique, with KA as reference.

FA showed significantly lower rates of medial and lateral SPI (2.9% and 2.2%) compared to KA (45.3%; p < 0.001, and 25.5%; p < 0.001) and compared to MA (52.6%; p < 0.001 and 29.9%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.228 and p = 0.417, respectively). FA showed significantly lower rates of severe medial and lateral SPI (0 and 0%) compared to KA (8.0%; p < 0.001 and 7.3%; p = 0.001) and compared to MA (10.2%; p < 0.001 and 4.4%; p = 0.013). There was no difference in severe medial and lateral SPI between KA and MA (p = 0.527 and p = 0.307, respectively). MA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (mean difference (MD) 1.4 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001), medial flexion (MD 1.5 mm, SD 1.8; p < 0.001), and lateral extension (MD 1.1 mm, SD 1.9; p < 0.001). FA resulted in thinner resections than KA in medial extension (MD 1.6 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001) and lateral extension (MD 2.0 mm, SD 1.6; p < 0.001), but in thicker medial flexion resections (MD 0.8 mm, SD 1.4; p < 0.001).

Mechanical and kinematic alignment (measured resection techniques) result in high rates of SPI. Pre-resection angular and translational adjustments with functional alignment, with typically smaller distal than posterior femoral resection, address this issue.

The adoption of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to enhance the precision of implant positioning and limb alignment. Despite its benefits, the adoption of such technology is often accompanied by an initial learning curve, which may result in increased operative times. This study sought to determine the learning curve for the ROSA (Robotic Surgical Assistant) Knee System (Zimmer Biomet) in performing TKA and to evaluate the accuracy of the system in executing bone cuts and angles as planned. The hypothesis of this study was that cumulative experience with this robotic system would lead to reduced operative times. Additionally, the ROSA system demonstrated reliability in terms of the accuracy and reproducibility of bone cuts.

In this retrospective observational study, we examined 110 medical records from 95 patients who underwent ROSA-assisted TKA performed by three surgeons. We employed the cumulative summation methodology to assess the learning curves related to operative time. Furthermore, we evaluated the accuracy of the ROSA Knee System in performing TKA by comparing planned versus validated values for femoral and tibial bone cuts and angles.

The learning curve for the ROSA Knee System spanned 14, 14, and 6 cases for the respective surgeons, with operative times decreasing by 22 min upon reaching proficiency (70.8 vs. 48.9 min; p < 0.001). Significant discrepancies were observed between the average planned and validated cuts and angles for femoral bone cuts (0.4 degree ± 2.4 for femoral flexion, 0.1 degree ± 0.6 for femoral coronal alignment, 0.3 mm ± 1.2 for distal medial femoral resection, 1.4 mm ± 8.8 for distal lateral femoral resection) and hip-knee-ankle axis alignment (0.3 degree ± 1.9 )(p < 0.05) but not for tibial bone cuts. Differences between planned and validated measurements during the learning and proficiency phases were nonsignificant across all parameters, except for the femoral flexion angle (0.42 degree ± 0.8 vs. 0.44 degree ± 2.7) (p = 0.49).

The ROSA Knee System can be integrated into surgical workflows after a modest learning curve of 6 to 14 cases. The system demonstrated high accuracy and reproducibility, particularly for tibial bone cuts. Acknowledging the learning curve associated with new robot-assisted TKA technologies is vital for their effective implementation.

A functional alignment technique for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) utilizes implant position modifications to balance the soft tissues. There is concern that, in some cases, extreme coronal and tibial component alignment could facilitate early implant failure. To be cautious, a restricted functional alignment may be used. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the results of TKA in patients who have varus deformities using a restricted functional alignment technique. We hypothesized that adding a medial soft-tissue release within restricted boundaries would not result in inferior outcomes.

A retrospective review was performed on robotic arm-assisted TKA patients with varus deformities utilizing a functional balancing strategy with a three-degree varus coronal limb and tibial component alignment restriction. Outcome scores of those patients still requiring a medial-soft tissue release were compared to those without for inferior outcomes.

A total of 202 of 259 (78.0%) knees were able to be balanced without any medial soft-tissue release with an average final hip-knee-ankle alignment of 1.9° varus. The remaining 57 knees required a medial soft-tissue release. They had an average final hip-knee-ankle of 2.8° varus and an average medial proximal tibial angle of 2.5° varus. Comparing the cohorts without and with a release, at final follow-up averaging two years, there was not a statistically significant difference in Knee Society-Knee Score (97.7 and 98.4, P = .525), Functional Score (86.7 and 88.7, P = .514), Forgotten Joint Score (59.8 and 66.6, P = .136), and Knee Injury Osteoarthritis Outcome Survey for Joint Replacement Junior Score (79.5 and 84.8, P = .066).

Utilizing a restrictive functional balancing strategy for TKA minimizes the need for soft-tissue releases and provides for excellent overall outcomes. An additional medial soft-tissue release can still be utilized without an inferior average two-year outcome.

Individualized alignment techniques have gained major interest in an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative alignment between kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) and assess whether KA significantly deviates from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible.

There were 234 patients who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using an unrestricted KA and a strict MA technique (KA: 145, MA: 89). The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibia angle, and the resultant arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were measured. The aHKA < 0 indicated varus alignment, while the aHKA > 0 indicated valgus knee alignment. The primary outcome was the frequency of cases that resulted in an aHKA of ± 4° of neutral (0°), as assessed on full-leg standing radiographs obtained at 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the change in coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type from preoperative to postoperative between the MA and KA groups.

The mean preoperative aHKA was similar between the 2 groups (P = .19). The KA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -1.4 ± 2.4°, while the MA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -0.5 ± 2.1°. No significant difference in limb alignment was identified between KA and MA cases that resulted in hip-knee-ankle angle of ± 4° being neutral (91.7 versus 96.6%, P = .14). There were 97.2% of cases in the KA group that fell within the ± 5° range. The MA group was associated with a significantly higher rate of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type change from preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001).

Kinematic alignment achieved similar postoperative aHKA compared to MA, and thus did not significantly deviate from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Surgeons should feel comfortable starting to introduce individualized alignment techniques. Without being restricted by boundaries, postoperative alignment will be within 5 degrees of neutral 97% of the time.

While the coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification serves as a useful guide in personalising total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the extent of its correlation with segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities remains uncertain. This study aims to investigate the potential correlation between CPAK matrix groups and segmental coronal extra-articular deformities in prearthritic knees, shedding light on the relationship between these two factors that seems to be both essential to perform personalised TKA.

A radiological assessment of 1240 nonarthritic knees was performed by evaluating lower limb measurements following the protocol established by Paley et al. Subsequently, all knees were classified into their respective CPAK matrix groups. In our quest to discern any correlation between the CPAK matrix groups and the presence of segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities, nine potential coronal extra-articular deformity phenotype (CEDP) groupswere identified based on medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA). Neutral values for MPTA and mLDFA were set at 90.0° ± 3.0° and then at 87.0° ± 2.0°. Each CPAK matrix group underwent detailed coronal morphology analysis and then, segmental coronal extra-articular deformities were assessed by comparing them with the CEDP groups.

The study revealed a mean hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) of 178.6° ± 4.4°, mLDFA of 86.9° ± 2.5°, MPTA of 85.4° ± 2.4°, arithmetic HKA of -1.4° ± 3.2° and joint line obliquity of 172.5° ± 3.7°. The varus CPAK groups (I/IV/VII) included 435 patients, the neutral groups (II/V/VIII) comprised 630 patients and the valgus groups (III/VI/IX) had 175 patients. Notably, CPAK matrix groups were not distinctly associated with specific coronal extra-articular deformity phenotype (CEDP) groups. Particularly among the most common CPAK matrix groups (I/II/III/IV/V), there was a significant variation in segmental coronal extra-articular deformity patterns. Moreover, when neutral MPTA/mLDFA values were set at 87.0° ± 2.0°, the CPAK matrix groups exhibited even greater variability in coronal extra-articular deformities.

The CPAK matrix groups do not exhibit a direct correlation with a specific extra-articular deformity pattern (CEDP), thus rendering them unsuitable for determining segmental coronal extra-articular knee deformities.

Level III, retrospective diagnostic study.

Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been driven by a growing focus on evidence-based medicine. This transition is reflected in the critical appraisal of both, the quality of work and the potential impact on the orthopedic community. The purpose of our study was to (1) identify the top 100 most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade and from all-time, and (2) compare methodological rigor of the most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade to articles all-time by level of evidence.

The top 100 cited articles were recorded for manuscripts from the last decade, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022, and manuscripts from all-time for TKA. We collected authors, year of publication, journal of the article, country of origin of authors, article type (basic science article, clinical research article), level of evidence, methodological index for non-randomized studies score, physiotherapy evidence database scale, and citation density (total citations/years published).

The largest number of studies for all-time TKA (53.0%) and decade TKA (42.0%) were Level III. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score for comparative studies was 18.7 for all-time TKA and 20.7 for decade TKA (P < .001). The average physiotherapy evidence database score was 6.1 for all-time TKA and 8.1 for decade TKA (P > .05). The highest citation density for all-time TKA was 111 and for past decade was 63. The number of level II studies in TKA increased from 19.0% from all time to 38.0% from the last decade (P < .05).

Our findings of improved methodologies over time reflect positive steps toward evidence-based practice in TKA. A continued focus on producing methodologically sound studies may guide evidence-based clinical decision-making.

Mechanical alignment (MA) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with neutral leg alignment, mechanical component alignment, and parallel gaps, has achieved good long-term survival. Patient satisfaction, however, is not always perfect. In contrast to the MA, which aims for an ideal goal for all patients, an alternative has been proposed: kinematic alignment (KA)-TKA. In KA, the articular surface is replicated using components aligning with the three kinematic axes. KA-TKA has been gaining popularity, and in addition to the true or calipered KA, various derivatives, such as restricted KA, soft-tissue respecting KA, and functional alignments, have been introduced. Moreover, the functional approach encompasses several sub-approaches. This somewhat complicated scenario has led to some confusion. Therefore, the terminology needs to be re-organized. The term "personalized alignment (PA)" has been used in contrast to the MA approach, including all approaches other than MA. The term "PA-TKA" should be used comprehensively instead of KA and it represents the recent trends in distinct and unique consideration of each individual case. In addition to a comparison between MA and KA, we suggest that evaluation should be conducted to decide which approach is the best for an individual patient within the "personalized alignment" concept.

The aim of this study was to investigate the distribution of phenotypes in Asian patients with end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and assess whether the phenotype affected the clinical outcome and survival of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We also compared the survival of the group in which the phenotype unintentionally remained unchanged with those in which it was corrected to neutral.

The study involved 945 TKAs, which were performed in 641 patients with primary OA, between January 2000 and January 2009. These were classified into 12 phenotypes based on the combined assessment of four categories of the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and three categories of actual joint line obliquity. The rates of survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and the log-rank test. The Hospital for Special Surgery score and survival of each phenotype were compared with those of the reference phenotype with neutral alignment and a parallel joint line. We also compared long-term survival between the unchanged phenotype group and the corrected to neutral alignment-parallel joint line group in patients with Type IV-b (mild to moderate varus alignment-parallel joint line) phenotype.

The most common phenotype was Type I-b (mild to moderate varus alignment-medial joint line; 27.1% (n = 256)), followed by Type IV-b (23.2%; n = 219). There was no significant difference in the clinical outcomes and long-term survival between the groups. In Type IV-b phenotypes, the neutrally corrected group showed higher 15-year survival compared with the unchanged-phenotype group (94.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.0 to 97.8) vs 74.2% (95% CI 98.0 to 100); p = 0.020).

Constitutional varus was confirmed in more than half of these patients. Mechanically aligned TKA can achieve consistent clinical outcomes and long-term survival, regardless of the patient's phenotype. The neutrally corrected group had better long-term survival compared with the unchanged phenotype group.

Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and medial pivot (MP) knee designs already showed superior outcomes in independent comparative studies. The objective of this study was to assess whether rKA with MP TKA provides better clinical and functional outcomes compared to mechanical alignment (MA) with MP TKA.

This is a randomised, parallel two group study involving a total of 98 patients with end-stage knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomly allocated to either rKA or MA TKA procedures conducted with a MP prothesis using patient-specific instruments between 2017 and 2020. Final follow-up was at 2 years postoperatively. Demographic data and clinical and functional scores (Oxford knee score, knee society score [KSS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], forgotten joint score [FJS]) were collected and compared preoperative, 1 year postoperative and 2 years postoperative. Coronal plane alignment of the knee and functional knee phenotype classification were recorded.

A total of 47 patients (rKA) and 51 patients (MA) were included in final analysis. Superior joint awareness scores (FJS) were found at 1 year postoperative for rKA (62.2 vs. 52.4, p = 0.04). KSS subscores (expectation score, satisfaction score) improved with rKA with significant differences at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Major differences between rKA and MA were found in subgroup analysis of varus and neutral CPAK phenotypes. Both 1 year and 2 years postoperatively, FJS was significantly better in KA compared with MA in varus CPAK phenotypes (63.1 vs. 44.9, p = 0.03; 71.1 vs. 46.0, p = 0.005). Further clinical and functional scores showed improvement in the varus CPAK phenotypes with predominantly significant improvement in the expectation and satisfaction KSS subscores. No significant differences were found in the comparison of rKA and MA in neutral CPAK phenotypes.

The rKA of MP TKA design shows superior patient satisfaction and self-reported function when compared to MA MP TKA. Furthermore, rKA MP TKA shows superior joint awareness at early postoperative stage. The most important clinical relevance of this study is the clear superiority of rKA in varus phenotypes.

Level II.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a reliable orthopedic procedure for knee osteoarthritis with long-term success rates of 90% after 15 years. Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) has been developed to improve the accuracy of the alignment and orientation of the components in TKA.

A prospective study involving 103 subjects who underwent CAS-TKA was conducted over a 3-year period. Subjects were assessed for pre- and post-operative varus and valgus deformity, BMI, comorbidities, and Knee Society Score (KSS). Outcome measures of post-operative KSS, post-operative alignment, and hospital stay were examined by Spearman correlation coefficients. Categorical outcomes of complication and secondary procedures were compared by chi-squared test and odds ratio.

The study considered 103 TKA patients with a mean ± SD age of 63.7 ± 8.4 years (33-88 years). Unilateral knee replacement was performed on 56 patients (54.3%) and remaining 47 (45.6%) had simultaneous bilateral TKA. Forty (34.8%) patients were obese, and severe pre-operative deformity (> 15°) was observed in 47 (31.3%) patients. Mean coronal alignment of the knee joint was 91.33° (SD: 90.69° valgus-88.92° varus). The mean post-operative KSS noted in obese and non-obese subjects were 93.43 (84-98) and 94.76 (85-98) respectively. Post-operative KSS for knees with severe deformity was 94.08 (80-98), while it was 95.76 (83-98) in those with mild to moderate deformities.

The study confirms that navigation in CAS-TKA consistently achieved coronal alignment of the knee joint within ± 3°, irrespective of the patient BMI and degree of deformity.

Windswept deformity (WSD) in relation to advanced osteoarthritis (OA) presents a significant surgical challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary goal of this study is to investigate the Prevalance of WSD associated osteoarthritis who have undergone total knee arthroplasty. The secondary goal is to explore the causes of WSD and its association with spinal deformity or leg length discrepancy in these patients. Finally, we evaluate the surgical outcomes of phenotype-considered kinematically aligned TKA (KA-TKA) in treating patients with WSD.

A review was conducted on data from 40 knees of 33 WSD patients who underwent phenotype-considered KA-TKA from August 2016 to December 2020. Patient demographics, associated diseases, preoperative and postoperative knee alignment angles, range of motion (ROM), Oxford Knee Score (OKS), and Knee Society Score (KSS) were collected and analyzed. Subgroup analysis for comparing the results between valgus and varus knees were also performed.

Within the studied cohort of WSD patients, a substantial 64% displayed concomitant coronal spinal imbalance and 21% evidenced leg length discrepancy. Postoperative improvements were notable in knee alignments, ROM, OKS, and KSS following the application of the phenotype-considered KA-TKA approach. There were significant differences in the knee alignment angles, including mHKA, LDFA, and MPTA, between the valgus and varus side of knees (P = 0.018). However, no statistically significant difference were observed in the functional scores, comprising ROM, OKS, and KSS, between valgus and varus knees.

A high percentage of patients with WSD exhibited coronal spinal imbalance and leg length discrepancy. Phenotype-considered KA-TKA effectively provided alignment targets for the treatment of both varus and valgus knees in patients with WSD, achieving excellent short-term outcomes and acceptable knee alignment.

This prospective study aimed to investigate the influence of patellar position (ie, eversion, lateralization, and reduction) on medial and lateral gap measurements during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in both cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) TKA designs.

The present work analyzed 50 knees with primary osteoarthritis that underwent TKA between July and November 2019. Medial and lateral gaps were measured at different knee flexion angles (0°, 45°, 90°, and 120°) in 3 patellar positions after sequentially inserting CR type and PS type trial component in the same knee.

In CR TKA, medial gaps in patellar reduction showed significantly smaller gaps at 90° and 120° of knee flexion compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). Lateral gaps in patellar reduction were also significantly larger than those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). The mediolateral gap difference in patellar reduction was significantly greater at all flexion angles compared to those in eversion and lateralization (P < .001). In PS TKA, similar patterns were observed for medial gaps, lateral gaps, and mediolateral gap differences (P < .001).

The ligament balancing with the patella everted or subluxed may lead to an overly tight medial gap and/or loose lateral gap in the knee with a closed arthrotomy, which has potential consequences for knee function in both CR and PS TKA designs. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering patellar position to ensure optimal soft-tissue balance and joint stability in TKA.

Robotic-assisted systems have gained popularity in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate operative characteristics and radiographic outcomes of obese patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA.

A retrospective review of consecutive cases performed by a single surgeon was performed from January 1, 2016, to January 31, 2022. Adult patients with body mass index ≥35 kg/m2 who underwent primary TKA using a computed tomography-assisted robotic system were compared to patients who underwent primary TKA using conventional instrumentation. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements, and intraoperative outcomes were compared between cohorts. In total, 119 patients were identified, 60 in the robotic-assisted cohort and 59 in the conventional instrumentation cohort.

Age, body mass index, and estimated blood loss were not significantly different between the cohorts. The robotic-assisted cohort experienced longer tourniquet times (93.3 vs 75.5 minutes, P < .001). Preoperative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) was similar between the robotic-assisted and conventional cohorts (8.4° ± 4.9° vs 9.3° ± 5.3°, P = .335). Postoperative HKA was 2.0° ± 1.4° in the robotic-assisted group and 3.1° ± 3.23° in the conventional group (P = .040). The proportion of patients with postoperative HKA > 3° of varus or valgus was 9 of 60 (15.0%) in the robotic-assisted cohort compared to 18 of 59 (30.5%) using conventional instrumentation (P = .043).

Obese patients treated with robotic-assisted TKA had postoperative alignment closer to neutral and fewer postoperative radiographic outliers than patients treated with conventional instrumentation. The results of this study support use of robotic-assisted technologies in TKA, particularly in obese patients.

Discrepancy between the clinical examination and the 2D/3D radiographs is a common concern in patients with angular or rotational deformities of the lower limbs, as it may alter clinical judgment and subsequent treatment. The aim was to identify such discrepancies and assess determinants that may contribute to their existence.

A retrospective chart review was conducted on 329 consecutive patients (658 lower limbs) who underwent physical examination and long-leg biplanar radiographs in our institution between 2013 and 2018 for limb length discrepancy or angular deformity of the knees (varus/valgus). Eleven parameters were measured on 2D and 3D images. 3D measurements were based on standing biplanar X-rays and their 3D reconstructions and were considered the gold standard. Contingency tables and multiple linear regression were used to assess discrepancies between the three modalities and their determinants respectively.

Significant mismatches were found between physical examination and 2D images (1% in varus and 1% in valgus), between physical examination and 3D assessment (1% in varus and 4.6% in valgus) as well as between 2 and 3D assessments (1.9% in varus and 7.6% in valgus). The significant determinants of the mismatch between 2 and 3D modalities were frontal pelvic obliquity, neck shaft angle, knee flexion, femoral torsion, and tibial mechanical angle.

In the presence of positional and/or morphological deformities, physical examination and 2D assessment of knee alignment could be biased due to axes projection errors. A better understanding of 3D alignment of the knee as part of the entire lower limb from pelvis to toes, may lead to a better diagnosis and subsequently a better treatment of knee angular deformities.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed with either conventional off-the-shelf (OTS) or customized individually-made (CIM) implants. The evidence for CIM implants is limited and variable, and the aim of this review was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes between CIM and OTS implants.

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting on clinical, radiological, or alignment outcomes for CIM and OTS implants were selected. The studies were appraised using the Methodical index for non-randomized studies tool.

Twenty-three studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The studies comprised 2856 CIM and 1877 OTS TKAs. Revision rate was higher with CIM (5.9%) compared to OTS (3.7%) implants [OR 1.23(95% CI 0.69-2.18)]. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) was higher in CIM (2.2%) compared to OTS (1.1%) group [OR 2.95(95% CI 0.95-9.13)] and complications rate was higher in CIM (5%) vs. OTS (4.5%) [OR 1.45(95% CI 0.53-3.96)] but neither reached statistical significance. Length of stay was significantly shorter in CIM group 2.9 days vs. 3.5 days [MD - 0.51(95% CI - 0.82 to - 0.20)]. Knee Society Score showed no difference between CIM and OTS groups for Knee 90.5 vs. 90.6 [MD - 0.27(95% CI - 4.27 to 3.73)] and Function 86.1 vs. 83.1 [MD 1.51(95% CI - 3.69 to 6.70)].

CIM implants in TKA have theoretical benefits over OTS prostheses. However, in this present review, CIM implants were associated with higher revisions, MUA, and overall complication rates. There was no difference in outcome score and CIM implants did not improve overall target alignment; however, more CIM TKAs were found to be in the HKA target zone compared to OTS TKAs. The findings of this review do not support the general utilization of CIM over OTS implants in TKA.

Introduction The goal of total knee arthroplasty is to replace diseased cartilage and bone with an artificial implant to improve the patient's quality of life. The knee has historically been reconstructed to the patient's mechanical axis (MA). However, kinematically aligned techniques have been increasingly used. Kinematic alignment requires less soft-tissue resection and aligns the knee with what is anatomically natural to the patient, while there is concern that kinematically aligned knees will lead to earlier failure due to potential unequal weight distribution on the implant. The purpose of this study is to compare the parallelism from the floor of the joint-line cuts using kinematic and mechanical alignment and understand if the MA is a proper estimation of the tibial-ankle axis (TA). Methods A retrospective study was conducted by recruiting all high tibial osteotomy and distal femoral osteotomy recipients operated on by two surgeons in two MedStar Health hospitals from 01/2013 to 07/2020 with full-length films in preparation for restorative procedures. Baseline osteoarthritis was graded using the Kellgren-Lawrence classification system with all patients presenting as Grade 0. The TA and the joint-line orientations of the MA and kinematic axis (KA) were measured on 66 legs. The average distance from parallelism to the ground was compared between the MA and the KA and between the MA and the TA using a paired t-test. Results KA joint-line orientation (1.705° deviation) was more parallel to the floor in the bipedal stance phase than the MA (2.316° deviation, p=0.0156). The MA (2.316° deviation) was not a proper estimation of the TA (4.278° deviation, p=0.0001). Conclusion By utilizing the KA technique, the restoration of the natural joint line, as well as a joint that is more parallel to the floor in the stance phase compared to the MA, is achieved. The parallelism to the ground of the KA during the bipedal stance phase suggests an even load distribution across the knee. In addition, due to its similarity to the KA and anatomical significance in weight-bearing distribution, further investigation into the hip-to-calcaneal axis as an approximation of the joint line is warranted.

This study aimed to compare long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes and survival rates between navigation-assisted (NAV) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and conventional (CON) TKA using a mobile-bearing insert.

From May 2008 to December 2009, 45 and 63 mobile-bearing TKA patients were enroled in the CON- and NAV-TKA groups with 146.8 months follow-up, respectively. Clinical outcomes (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index and Knee Society Scores), radiographic outcomes (hip-knee-ankle [HKA], lateral distal femoral, medial proximal tibial, γ, and δ angles), and survivorship were compared between both groups.

The number of HKA angle outliers (more than 3 degrees or less than -3 degree) was significantly lower in the NAV-TKA group (24.4% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.036) than in the CON-TKA group. However, long-term clinical outcomes were similar between both groups. The cumulative survival rate (best-case scenario) was 98.3% in the CON-TKA group and 97.5% in the NAV-TKA group, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.883).

Long-term clinical outcomes and survival rates were similar between the two groups despite fewer outliers of postoperative lower-limb alignment in the NAV-TKA group. Excellent survival rates were observed in both groups using mobile-bearing inserts.

Level IV, case series.

Restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (rKA-TKA) is a reasonable selection for avoiding an extreme alignment that has been conceded to induce implant failure. However, computer-aided devices (CAS), such as navigation, robotics, and patient-specific instrumentation, are necessary to perform rKA-TKA. This paper reports on the surgical technique of kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty (KA-TKA) using mechanical instruments. The lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) are measured from preoperative long radiographs or CT of the lower limb, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is calculated from the MPTA - LDFA. The predefined restriction boundaries are used to determine the osteotomy angle. In our practice, the LDFA is 85° to 93°, the MPTA is 85° to 90°, and the aHKA is 5° varus to 3° valgus. If correction of the femoral osteotomy is required, this can be achieved by changing the thickness of the paddle set on the distal articular surface or by adjusting the angle of the variable angle femoral cutting guide. For the tibia, the distal end of the extramedullary rod, with the proximal part placed in the center of the knee joint, should be adjusted so that it does not exceed the lateral malleolus. This limits the medial tilt of the osteotomy plane to within 5.5°. These techniques allow restricted KA to be performed with existing mechanical instruments without using CAS.

IntroductionIn craniofacial surgery, magnetic navigation systems can effectively extend the doctor's limited visual range, improve their surgical precision, shorten the operation time, and reduce the incidence of surgical complications. Owing to the ease of magnetic navigation, the accuracy of the magnetic navigation system is affected by various equipment in the operating room. Therefore, its large-scale application is lacking because the navigation accuracy requirement can be extremely high during craniofacial surgery. Therefore, the accuracy of magnetic navigation systems is crucial. Various surgical instruments have been evaluated to effectively reduce the interference of magnetic navigation systems with surgical instruments. In craniofacial surgery, magnetic navigation systems can effectively extend the doctor's limited visual range, improve their surgical precision, shorten the operation time, and reduce the incidence of surgical complications. Owing to the ease of magnetic navigation, the accuracy of the magnetic navigation system is affected by various equipment in the operating room. Therefore, its large-scale application is lacking because the navigation accuracy requirement can be extremely high during craniofacial surgery. Therefore, the accuracy of magnetic navigation systems is crucial. Various surgical instruments have been evaluated to effectively reduce the interference of magnetic navigation systems with surgical instruments. In the surgical environment, the use of surgical instruments during mandibular surgery was simulated by selecting several conventional surgical instruments to record errors in the magnetic navigation system. The fluctuation values of the magnetic navigation errors were subsequently estimated and changes in its accuracy measured. MATLAB was used to calculate and analyze the fluctuations of the magnetic navigation errors. As results, the high-frequency electrosurgical system caused the greatest interference with the magnetic navigation system during surgery while powered on, with a maximum fluctuation error value of 1.8120 mm, and the maximum fluctuation error values of the stitch scissors, teeth forceps, and a needle holder were 1.3662, 1.3781, and 0.3912 mm, respectively. The closer the instrument is to the magnetic field generator or navigation target, the greater its impact. In conclusion, stitch scissors, teeth forceps, a needle holder, and the high-frequency electrosurgical system all affect magnetic navigation system accuracy. Therefore, it is necessary to avoid magnetic navigation system use and surgical instrument disturbances during surgery or select surgical instruments that do not interfere with the system. Surgical instruments must be evaluated for electromagnetic interference before they can be used in surgery with a magnetic navigation system.

Extra-articular lower-leg deformities mandate unique considerations when planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor limb alignment may increase perioperative complications and cause early implant failure. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of staged, extra-articular deformity correction about the knee in the setting of osteoarthritis and TKA.

A retrospective review was conducted from December 2007 to December 2019 identifying 30 deformities in 27 patients (average age: 52.7 years; range 31-74) who underwent staged surgical correction of extra-articular deformity in preparation for TKA. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical and radiographic measurements, severity of knee arthritis, and complications were collected.

There were 17 femur and 12 tibia deformities. There was an average improvement of 14.7° of deformity measured in the coronal plane and 12.7° of deformity in the sagittal plane in the femur and 13.5° in the coronal plane and 10.3° in the sagittal plane in the tibia. Leg length discrepancies improved by 26 mm on average (1-100 mm). After an average 3.1-year follow-up, 12 out of 27 patients proceeded with primary or revision TKA. There were no cases of blood transfusion, nerve palsy, or compartment syndrome, and all patients achieved bony union.

Staged, extra-articular deformity correction is a safe and effective approach to improve limb alignment in the setting of knee osteoarthritis and TKA.

Correct mechanical alignment (180° hip-knee-angle (HKA)) may be difficult to obtain on a consistent basis in obese patients. This is a randomized controlled study comparing the post-operative coronal alignment in obese patients between two surgical total knee arthroplasty (TKA) techniques - conventional and computer assisted navigation. The primary outcome was the post-operative HKA. A total of 60 patients were assigned to undergo conventional total knee arthroplasty (30 patients) or computerized assisted stereotaxic navigation system with Bluetooth communication surgery (30 patients). One patient from the study group was excluded due to malfunction of the navigation system. Good quality x-rays were available in 57 patients. There was no difference between the groups. Post-operative HKA was 2.8° and 2.9° in the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.87). In obese patients undergoing TKA, computerized navigation had no impact on post-op HKA. Clincal Trial Registration Number: HMO 0092-13.

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been extensively documented and it was attributed to numerous factors. In recent years, significant focus has been directed towards implant alignment and stability as potential causes and solutions to this issue. Surgeons are now exploring a more personalized approach to TKA, recognizing the importance of thoroughly understanding each individual patient's anatomy and functional morphology. A more comprehensive preoperative analysis of alignment and knee morphology is essential to address the unresolved questions in knee arthroplasty effectively. The crucial task of determining the most appropriate alignment strategy for each patient arises, given the substantial variability in bone resection resulting from the interplay of phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. This review aims to comprehensively present the definitions of different alignment techniques in all planes and discuss the consequences dependent on knee phenotypes.Level of evidence V.

This study aimed to investigate the association between objective baropodometric and radiological measurements and patient self-reported functional outcomes, assessed through the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Additionally, it sought to evaluate the effectiveness of static baropodometry in predicting short-term KOOS results following unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We conducted a prospective single-center study involving 32 patients who underwent unilateral TKA for knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Patients were evaluated both preoperatively and six months postoperatively, utilizing objective measurements derived from static baropodometric analysis in a normal, relaxed, bipedal standing position using a multi-platform Plantar Pressure Analysis System (PPAS) and radiographic measurements of the femorotibial angle (FTA) and subjective assessments through the national validated version of the KOOS. The study found an insignificant average correction of -0.69° ± 4.12° in the preoperative FTA at the sixth month after TKA. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the KOOS based on different types of knee alignment (KA) both pre- and postoperatively (p > 0.05). No significant correlations were observed between the KOOS, and total average affected and unaffected plantar pressures (TAAPP and TAUPP) pre- and postoperatively, as well as KA pre- and postoperatively. However, significant changes were observed in TAAPP and TAUPP measurements after unilateral TKA. TAAPP demonstrated a significant increase postoperatively (mean change (SD) = 18.60 (47.71); p = 0.035). In conclusion, this study found no significant correlation between KA, static baropodometric measurements, including pre- and postoperative differences, and KOOS outcomes. Therefore, static plantar pressure measurements alone might not serve as a reliable predictor of short-term clinical outcomes after unilateral TKA, as reported by patients.