Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2026; 17(7): 123540
Published online Jul 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123540
Published online Jul 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.123540
Table 1 Core differences between the traditional static model and the proposed time-risk-state dynamic framework
| Dimension | Traditional static model | Proposed three-dimensional dynamic framework |
| Risk rating | One-time, fixed; based on baseline cyst morphology | Dynamic, adjustable; redefined after 2 years of stable follow-up |
| Surveillance intensity | Uniform for all patients (magnetic resonance imaging/endoscopic ultrasound every 6-12 months) | Differentiated by risk: Intensified (0-2 years) → low-frequency (2-5 years) → possible discontinuation (≥ 5 years) |
| Core decision variables | Cyst size, mural nodules, MPD diameter, CA19-9 level | Three-dimensional: Cyst biology + temporal stability (2-year NPV) + patient status (age and CCI) |
| Endpoint for discontinuation | “Surveillance until patient unfit for surgery” (passive, vague) | Clear, active thresholds: Stable for ≥ 5 years, age ≥ 75 years or CCI ≥ 3, SIR not significantly different from that of the general population |
- Citation: Xu JJ, Ni CX. Letter to the Editor: Beyond cyst size - a time-risk-state framework for dynamic surveillance de-escalation of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 123540
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v17/i7/123540.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.123540