BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jun 24, 2026; 17(6): 119535
Published online Jun 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.119535
Table 1 Comparison of baseline characteristics between 3D-conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy groups, n (%)/median (interquartile range)
Characteristic
3D-CRT (n = 59)
IMRT (n = 71)
Age (years)56 (45-72)59 (47-71)
Male39 (66)35 (49)
Female20 (34)36 (51)
BMI27.5 (24.7-32.2)26.4 (24.0-28.3)
Max tumor diameter (cm)11.0 (5.5-15.0)9.8 (6.8-15.5)
Tumor size > 10 cm30 (51)32 (45)
R1-resection12 (20)15 (21)
G3-STS37 (63)35 (49)
Periosteal stripping7 (12)6 (8)
Bone resection24 (41)20 (28)
RT dose (Gy)60 (50-60)60 (50-66)
Arterial hypertension23 (39)27 (38)
Osteoporosis0 (0)4 (6)
Table 2 Multivariate Firth’s penalized Cox regression analysis for risk factors
Characteristic
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Age 1.020.99-1.050.185
Arterial hypertension1.990.72-5.440.166
Radiotherapy3.160.57-17.450.116
Bone resection3.201.32-7.770.007
Osteoporosis6.011.39-25.940.037
Table 3 Multivariate Firth’s penalized Cox regression analysis for risk factors
Characteristic
Hazard ratio
95%CI
P value
Age > 60 years1.471.68-63.000.469
Arterial hypertension2.362.32-746.400.103
Radiotherapy3.201.78-51719005.040.182
Bone resection3.273.83-2857.430.009
Osteoporosis6.284.22-803808597164.850.014


Write to the Help Desk