Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Oncol. May 24, 2021; 12(5): 367-381
Published online May 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i5.367
Published online May 24, 2021. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i5.367
Electroporation protocol | ||||||||
Ref. | Type of pulse | Number of pulses | Pulse duration | Pulse frequency | Electric field | Muscle contraction/pain reduction | ||
Daskalov et al[36], 1999 | In vivo | ECT | Monophasic | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 0.33-1.25 kV/cm | Achievable with biphasic pulses |
Biphasic | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 50-0-50 μs | 1 Hz | |||||
Biphasic | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 50-0-50 μs | Approximately 909 Hz | |||||
Miklavcic et al[37], 2005 | In vivo | ECT | Monopolar | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 1 to 5000 Hz (ten or five steps) | 88 or 313 V/cm | Achievable with high frequency pulses |
Zupanic et al[38], 2007 | In vivo | ECT | Monopolar | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 600 V/cm | Achievable with high frequency pulses |
Monopolar | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 5000 Hz | |||||
Spugnini et al[39], 2014 | In vitro | ECT | Biphasic | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 50-10-50 μs | 9 kHz | 1.3 kV/cm | Achievable with biphasic pulses |
In vivo | ||||||||
Scuderi et al[40], 2019 | In vitro | ECT | Monopolar | 1 burst of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 1.2 kV/cm | Achievable with bipolar HF-EP |
Bipolar | 8 bursts of 50 pulses | 1-1-1 μs | 250 kHz | 3 kV/cm | ||||
García-Sánchez et al[41], 2020 | In vivo | ECT | Unipolar | Bursts of 8 pulses | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 1.3 kV/cm | Achievable with sinusoidal pulses |
Bipolar | Number of bursts and pulses depend on experiments and frequency | 100 μs-5 ms | 10-100 kHz | > 1.3 kV/cm | ||||
Sinusoidal | ||||||||
Golberg and Rubinsky[28], 2012 | Numerical | - | Monopolar | 1 pulse | 100 μs | - | > 800 V/cm | Achievable with an appropriate electrode design and arrangement |
Arena et al[32], 2011 | In vivo | IRE | Monopolar | 90-180 pulses | 200 μs | 1 Hz | 0.5-2 kV/cm | Achievable with H-FIRE |
Bipolar | 180 bursts of 50 pulses | 2-0-2 μs | 250 kHz | 1-4 kV/cm | ||||
Bipolar | 180 bursts of 100 pulses | 1-0-1 μs | 500 kHz | 4 kV/cm | ||||
Sano et al[42], 2014 | In vitro | IRE | Bipolar | 80 bursts of 1 pulse | 50-2-50 μs | 1 Hz | 1.5 kV/cm | Achievable with biphasic pulses |
Sano et al[43], 2015 | In vitro | IRE | Monopolar | 1 pulse | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 1.5 kV/cm | Achievable with bipolar pulses |
In vivo | Bipolar | 8-120 bursts of 1-200 pulses | Pulse width: 250 ns-50 μs | 20 to 20000 kHz (seven steps) | Approximately 0.5-2 kV/cm | |||
Sweeney et al[33], 2016 | In vitro | IRE | Monopolar | 1 burst of 200 pulses | 100 μs | 2 kHz | 750-1250 V/cm | Achievable with high-frequency bipolar pulses |
Bipolar | 200 bursts of 50 pulses | 1 -1-1 μs | 250 kHz | 1250 V/cm | ||||
Bipolar | 200 bursts of 50 pulses | 1-4-1 μs | 100 kHz | 1250 V/cm | ||||
Yao et al[44], 2017 | In vivo | IRE | Bipolar | 90 bursts of 50 pulses | 2-2-2 μs | 250 kHz | 1-2 kV/cm | Achievable with H-FIRE and insulated needle electrodes |
Bipolar | 90 bursts of 20 pulses | 5-2-5 μs | Approximately 143 kHz | |||||
Bipolar | 90 bursts of 10 pulses | 10-2-10 μs | Approximately 83 kHz | |||||
Bipolar | 90 bursts of 4 pulses | 25-2-25 μs | Approximately 37 kHz | 1–1.75 kV/cm | ||||
Bipolar | 90 bursts of 2 pulses | 50-2-50 μs | Approximately 20 kHz | 1–1.5 kV/cm | ||||
Monopolar | 90 bursts of 1 pulse | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 0.8–1.5 kV/cm | ||||
Sano et al[29], 2018 | Ex vivo | IRE | Monopolar | 5 pulses | 100 μs | 1 Hz | 1 kV/cm | Achievable with (symmetric) H-FIRE pulses |
Bipolar | 5 bursts of 1-200 pulses | 2-2-2 μs | Not available | 0.17-1.7 kV/cm |
- Citation: Fusco R, Di Bernardo E, D'Alessio V, Salati S, Cadossi M. Reduction of muscle contraction and pain in electroporation-based treatments: An overview. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12(5): 367-381
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-4333/full/v12/i5/367.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v12.i5.367