BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Clin Oncol. Jul 24, 2026; 17(7): 121262
Published online Jul 24, 2026. doi: 10.5306/wjco.121262
Figure 1
Figure 1 Immunohistochemical evaluation of the proband pathological sections. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining; B: Vimentin (+) staining, C: CD99 (+) staining, D: CK (-) staining; E: CD56 (+) staining; F: Fluorescence in situ hybridization imaging. A: Magnification × 100; B-E: Magnification × 200; F: Magnification × 1000.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Brain magnetic resonance imaging scan. A: Preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the patient; B: Postoperative brain MRI; C: Brain MRI following radio and chemotherapy.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Biological analysis of risk variants. A and B: Neurofibromin 1 Leu 190 (A) and secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) Arg 255 (B) across species; C and D: Schematic diagrams of the 3D SPARC protein structure prior to and after C > D mutation, which altered the amino acid at position 255 from an arginine to a histidine.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Timeline of the patient’s clinical course. PR: Partial response; SD: Stable disease.


Write to the Help Desk