BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Song ZN, Cheng Y, Wang DD, Li MJ, Zhao XR, Li FW, Liu Z, Zhu XR, Jia XD, Wang YF, Liang FF. Whole exome sequencing identifies risk variants associated with intracranial epidermoid cyst deterioration: A case report. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15(11): 1428-1434 [PMID: 39582614 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i11.1428]
Reader's ID:
07996708
Submitted on:
October 15, 2024, 11:17
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
Title: A Study on the Deterioration of Intracranial Epidermoid Cysts through Whole Exome Sequencing Dear Editors and Authors, First and foremost, I would like to congratulate the authors on the publication of this high-quality case report on the malignant transformation of intracranial epidermoid cysts (IEC) into squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the "World Journal of Clinical Oncology." This study not only provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the transformation of IEC to SCC but also reveals two potential disease-related gene mutations: GJB2 (c.257C>T) and TLR2 (c.1039A>G) through whole exome sequencing (WES). Comment Content: Innovation and Importance of the Study: The innovation of this study lies in providing the first clinical evidence for the potential role of GJB2 and TLR2 in the development and treatment of IEC. This is significant for guiding future research directions and potential therapeutic targets. Rigorous Study Design: The authors have employed WES technology, which is efficient and cost-effective for processing large amounts of data quickly. This method is highly applicable for screening genetic variants related to rare and complex diseases, demonstrating the rigor and forward-thinking of the study design. Detailed Case Report: The article provides a very detailed description of the case, including the patient's clinical symptoms, medical history, laboratory test results, and imaging examination results. These details help readers to fully understand the case and provide valuable data for future research. In-Depth Analysis of Genetic Variants: The authors not only identified two risk variants but also conducted an in-depth analysis of their impact on protein structure and function. This in-depth analysis helps to understand how these variants affect the occurrence and development of the disease. Comprehensive Treatment and Follow-Up: The article describes the patient's treatment process and follow-up results in detail, providing valuable references for clinical doctors and demonstrating the effectiveness of comprehensive treatment in controlling the condition. Suggestions for Improvement: Increase the Sample Size: Although this is a report on a rare case, increasing the sample size will help to verify the association between these gene mutations and the deterioration of IEC and improve the generalizability and reliability of the study's results. Functional Validation Experiments: The authors mentioned plans for functional validation experiments in future studies. These experiments will help further confirm the role of GJB2 and TLR2 in the development of IEC and how these mutations affect protein function. Long-Term Follow-Up Data: Long-term follow-up data will help assess the long-term effects of treatment and the patient's quality of life, which is crucial for evaluating treatment outcomes and formulating treatment guidelines. Conclusion: This article is an important contribution to the study of the mechanisms underlying the malignant transformation of IEC. It not only enhances our understanding of the genetic basis of this rare disease but also provides new ideas for future treatments. The authors' work is commendable, and I look forward to their future research bringing more breakthrough
Reply from the Editorial Office:
First, thank you very much for your professional comments on the article published in World Journal of Clinical Oncology. Second, we read your comments with great interest. You are welcome to format your valuable comments into a Letter to the Editor and submit it online to World Journal of Clinical Oncology at https://www.f6publishing.com. There are no restrictions on the number of words, figures (color, B/W) or authors for a Letter to the Editor. In addition, the article processing charge will be exempted for this Letter to the Editor. As with all articles published by the Baishideng Publishing Group, the Letter to the Editor will be published online after completing peer review. The guidelines for a Letter to the Editor can be found at: https://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/GerInfo/219. Finally, we look forward to receiving your high-quality Letter to the Editor, which will promote academic communication and lead the development of this discipline.