Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. However, since the discovery and development of targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, it has been a dramatically improved in survival outcomes and quality of life. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements occur in approximately 5% of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the introduction of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has changed the treatment paradigm. Although head-to-head randomized controlled trials for late generation inhibitors are lacking, the authors will review the current available options, treatments efficacy, safety profiles, ALK mechanisms of resistance, as well as new promising treatments in this field.

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial tumors in adults and the major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. The occurrence of BMs varies according to the type of primary tumors with most frequence in lung cancer, melanoma and breast cancer. Among of them, lung cancer has been reported to have a higher risk of BMs than other types of cancers with 40 ~ 50% of such patients will develop BMs during the course of disease. BMs lead to many neurological complications and result in a poor quality of life and short life span. Although the treatment strategies were improved for brain tumors in the past decades, the prognosis of BMs patients is grim. Poorly understanding of the molecular and cellular characteristics of BMs and the complicated interaction with brain microenvironment are the major reasons for the dismal prognosis of BM patients. Recent studies have enhanced understanding of the mechanisms of BMs. The newly identified potential therapeutic targets and the advanced therapeutic strategies have brought light for a better cure of BMs. In this review, we summarized the mechanisms of BMs during the metastatic course, the molecular and cellular landscapes of BMs, and the advances of novel drug delivery systems for overcoming the obstruction of blood-brain barrier (BBB). We further discussed the challenges of the emerging therapeutic strategies, such as synergistic approach of combining targeted therapy with immunotherapy, which will provide vital clues for realizing the precise and personalized medicine for BM patients in the future.

Through deeper understanding of targetable driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past years, some patients with driver mutations have benefited from the targeted molecular therapies. Although the anaplastic lymphoma kinase and BRAF mutations are not frequent subtypes in NSCLC, the availability of several targeted-drugs has been confirmed through a series of clinical trials. But little is clear about the proper strategy in rare BRAF G469A mutation, not to mention co-exhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and BRAF G469A mutations, which is extremely rare in NSCLC.

We present a patient to stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma with coexisting echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 rearrangement and BRAF G469A mutation. She received several targeted drugs with unintended resistance and suffered from unbearable adverse events.

Due to the rarity of co-mutations, the case not only enriches the limited literature on NSCLC harbouring BRAF G469A and echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 mutations, but also suggests the efficacy and safety of specific multiple-drug therapy in such patients.

Since the discovery of the first-generation ALK inhibitor, many other tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated to be effective in the first line or further lines of treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EMLA4-ALK translocation. This review traces the main milestones in the treatment of ALK-positive metastatic patients and the survival outcomes in the first-line and second-line settings with different ALK inhibitors. It presents the two options available for first-line treatment at the present time: sequencing different ALK inhibitors versus using the most potent inhibitor in front-line treatment. The efficacy outcomes of different ALK inhibitors in the first-line setting; the molecular profile of the disease, including mutation resistances and ALK variants and co-mutations; and patients' co-morbidities and inhibitor toxicities should be taken into account to address the choice of the first-line treatment, as suggested in this review.

Detailed clinical data about combination treatment with MET inhibitor (METi) and EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) is lacking in patients with EGFR-mutant, MET-amplified, and EGFRi-resistant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to report longitudinal data on the efficacy and safety of this combination treatment.

We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients with advanced EGFR-mutant and MET-amplified NSCLC who were treated with any types of METi plus EGFRi after progression with EGFRi at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Longitudinal clinicogenomic data and plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) data were collected.

The overall response rate was 74.4% and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.3-7.3]. Twenty-three patients (52.3%) required either or both treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects. The main cause of discontinuation was pneumonitis (69.2%). There was no significant difference in the PFS of patients with or without METi discontinuation [hazard ratio (HR), 0.93; 95% CI: 0.49-1.78; P=0.83]. Median clearance time of MET amplification in plasma ctDNA was measured as 63 days. Patients who stopped METi within 63 days of initiation showed poorer PFS compared to those who discontinued after (HR, 2.78; 95% CI: 1.00-7.75; P=0.050). Diverse resistance mechanisms including on-target mutations in MET (D1246H) and EGFR (C797S or T790M) were detected in 14 patients. One MET D1246H-mutant case and one EGFR C797S-mutant case responded to sitravatinib and amivantamab, respectively.

A combination of METi and EGFRi showed a promising anti-tumor effect in advanced EGFR-mutant and MET-amplified NSCLC. Pneumonitis was the main adverse effects leading to treatment discontinuation. Early discontinuation of METi negatively affected the survival outcomes.

Lung cancer is a type of cancer that can metastasize to the lungs, brain, bones, liver, adrenal glands, and other organs; however, the occurrence of brain metastases is the most common event. Symptoms of brain metastasis include motor dysfunction, mental dysfunction, seizures, headaches, nausea, and vomiting, and significantly reduce the quality of life of cancer patients. Brain metastases are a poor prognostic factor, and controlling them is extremely important for prolonging prognosis and improving the quality of life. Currently, local surgery and radiotherapy are recommended for their treatment. However, recently, cancer treatments using molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced, which may also be effective against brain metastases. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether local or systemic therapy is optimal for each case. In this review, we focus on recent findings regarding drug therapy in treating brain metastases from advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The main adjuvant therapies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy. We aimed to compare differences in the incidence of thromboembolism (TE) among different treatment options.

Using a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and Web of Science databases before 10 June 2023.

We included published randomised controlled trials (RCT) involving comparisons of treatments between chemotherapy and ALK-TKI drugs.

Assessed risk bias with Cochrane tool. Conducted NMA with GEMTC in R, we evaluate the model fit using the deviation information criteria. Estimated posterior distribution using Markov Chain Monte Carlo, 4 chains, 10 fine-tuned iterations, 10 000 iterations per chain, total 50 000 iterations. Monitored potential scale reduction factor for convergence. And checked convergence with Gelman-Rubin statistics and trace plot. Provided surface under the cumulative ranking, lower values indicate less TE event probability.

Analysis of eight RCTs showed that, compared with that for crizotinib, there was a lower risk of total TE with chemotherapy (OR, 0.28; 95% credible intervals (CrI) 0.11 to 0.63), brigatinib (OR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.11 to 0.79) and ceritinib (OR 0.13; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.45). In addition, analysis of venous TE (VTE) showed similar results, with a lower occurrence for chemotherapy (OR 0.27; 95% CrI 0.1 to 0.62), brigatinib (OR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.6) and ceritinib (OR 0.1; 95% CrI 0.02 to 0.43) compared with that for crizotinib. There were no significant differences in the occurrence of arterial TE among the different treatment options.

Compared with chemotherapy, alectinib, lorlatinib, brigatinib and ceritinib, crizotinib significantly increased the risk of TE and VTE.

CRD42023373307.

The central nervous system (CNS) represents a site of sanctuary for many metastatic tumors when systemic therapies that control the primary tumor cannot effectively penetrate intracranial lesions. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are the most likely of all neoplasms to metastasize to the brain, with up to 60% of patients developing CNS metastases during the disease process. Targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have helped reduce lung cancer mortality but vary considerably in their capacity to control CNS metastases. The ability of these therapies to effectively target lesions in the CNS depends on several of their pharmacokinetic properties, including blood-brain barrier permeability, affinity for efflux transporters, and binding affinity for both plasma and brain tissue. Despite the existence of numerous preclinical models with which to characterize these properties, many targeted therapies have not been rigorously tested for CNS penetration during the discovery process, whereas some made it through preclinical testing despite poor brain penetration kinetics. Several TKIs have now been engineered with the characteristics of CNS-penetrant drugs, with clinical trials proving these efforts fruitful. This Review outlines the extent and variability of preclinical evidence for the efficacy of NSCLC-targeted therapies, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or are in development, for treating CNS metastases, and how these data correlate with clinical outcomes.

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases from lung cancers and melanoma, significantly contribute to morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in local therapies, there is a need for effective systemic treatments. Pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, has shown promise for some patients with untreated brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aims to analyze the response of brain metastasis to pembrolizumab and associate characteristics like size and location with treatment outcome.

This retrospective study used imaging data from a phase II trial of pembrolizumab in melanoma or NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases. MRI evaluations were conducted at 2 month intervals, with each brain metastasis treated as a distinct tumor for response assessment, based on modified RECIST criteria (maximum 5 lesions, 5 mm target lesions).

Of 130 individual target metastases (> 5 mm), in 65 patients with NSCLC (90 metastases) and Melanoma (40 metastases), 32 (24.6%) demonstrated complete resolution, 24 (18.5%) had partial resolution, 32 (24.6%) were SD and 42 (32.3%) demonstrated PD. Those smaller than 10 mm were more likely to show complete resolution (p = 0.0218), while those ≥ 10 mm were more likely to have PR. There was no significant association between size, number or location (supratentorial vs. infratentorial) and lesion progression. The median time to metastatic lesion progression in the brain was 5.7-7 weeks.

Pembrolizumab is effective in brain metastases from NSCLC and melanoma, showing response (CR + PR) in 43% and progression (PD) in 32% of metastases. With the median time to CNS progression of 5.7-7 weeks, careful radiographic monitoring is essential to guide timely local treatment decisions.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have transformed the treatment paradigm for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Yet the differential efficacy between alectinib and crizotinib in treating patients with NSCLC and central nervous system (CNS) metastases has been insufficiently studied. A retrospective analysis was conducted of clinical outcomes of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases treated at the Shandong Cancer Centre. Based on their initial ALK-TKI treatment, patients were categorised into either the crizotinib group or the alectinib group. Efficacy, progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. A total of 46 eligible patients were enrolled in the present study: 33 patients received crizotinib and 13 patients received alectinib. The median OS of the entire group was 66.8 months (95% CI: 48.5-85.1). Compared with the patients in the crizotinib group, the patients in the alectinib group showed a significant improvement in both median (m)PFS (27.5 vs. 9.5 months; P=0.003) and intracranial mPFS (36.0 vs. 10.8 months; P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the alectinib and crizotinib groups (not reached vs. 58.7 months; P=0.149). Furthermore, there were no significant differences between patients receiving TKI combined with radiotherapy (RT) vs. TKI alone with respect to mPFS (11.0 vs. 11.7 months, P=0.863) as well as intracranial mPFS (12.5 vs. 16.9 months, P=0.721). In the present study, alectinib exhibited superior efficacy to crizotinib for treating patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and CNS metastases, especially in terms of delaying disease progression and preventing CNS recurrence. Moreover, the results demonstrated that it might be beneficial to delay local RT for patients with ALK-positive NSCL and CNS metastases.

Brain metastasis (BM) is common among cases of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is the leading cause of death for these patients. Mesothelin (MSLN), a tumor-associated antigen expressed in many solid tumors, has been reported to be involved in the progression of multiple tumors. However, its potential involvement in BM of NSCLC and the underlying mechanism remain unknown.

The expression of MSLN was validated in clinical tissue and serum samples using immunohistochemistry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The ability of NSCLC cells to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB) was examined using an in vitro Transwell model and an ex vivo multi-organ microfluidic bionic chip. Immunofluorescence staining and western blotting were used to detect the disruption of tight junctions. In vivo BBB leakiness assay was performed to assess the barrier integrity. MET expression and activation was detected by western blotting. The therapeutic efficacy of drugs targeting MSLN (anetumab) and MET (crizotinib/capmatinib) on BM was evaluated in animal studies.

MSLN expression was significantly elevated in both serum and tumor tissue samples from NSCLC patients with BM and correlated with a poor clinical prognosis. MSLN significantly enhanced the brain metastatic abilities of NSCLC cells, especially BBB extravasation. Mechanistically, MSLN facilitated the expression and activation of MET through the c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathway, which allowed tumor cells to disrupt tight junctions and the integrity of the BBB and thereby penetrate the barrier. Drugs targeting MSLN (anetumab) and MET (crizotinib/capmatinib) effectively blocked the development of BM and prolonged the survival of mice.

Our results demonstrate that MSLN plays a critical role in BM of NSCLC by modulating the JNK/MET signaling network and thus, provides a potential novel therapeutic target for preventing BM in NSCLC patients.

Alectinib is the first-line therapy for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Although some guidelines have recommended using other anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure, evidence for such regimens in patients who fail to respond to alectinib is limited. This study involved using administrative claims data from acute care hospitals in Japan. We extracted the data of 634 patients diagnosed with lung cancer between September 1, 2014, and January 31, 2023, who received alectinib treatment before treatment with another anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor. We assessed distributions of patients according to their treatment sequencing and prognosis among three periods defined based on the initial marketing dates of lorlatinib and brigatinib. The type of anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure changed over time. In the most recent period, lorlatinib (58%) and brigatinib (40%) became predominant. Two-year overall survival improved over time (47%-84%), accompanied by an increased 2-year proportion of patients who continuously used anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors after alectinib failure (13%-44%). The times to treatment discontinuation of the regimen between patients treated with lorlatinib and brigatinib were similar, with a hazard ratio of 1.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.64) in the period after marketing brigatinib. This study provides insights into the evolving treatment landscape for patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small-cell lung cancer who experience failed alectinib treatment and highlights the need for further studies and data accumulation to determine the optimal treatment strategy.

The ALTA-1 L trial and EXP-3B arm of NCT01970865 trial found that both brigatinib and lorlatinib showed durable and robust responses in treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, brigatinib and lorlatinib treatments are costly and need indefinite administration until the disease progression. Thus, it remains uncertain whether using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy is cost-effective compared to reserving these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy.

We used a Markov model to assess clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of treating ALK-positive NSCLC individuals with brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy versus a strategy of reserving these drugs until progression after chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were estimated using parametric survival modeling based on multiple clinical trials. The drug acquisition costs, adverse events costs, administration costs were extracted from published studies before and publicly available data. We calculated lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of a United States payer.

Our base-case analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of using first-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib compared with second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib is $-400,722.09/QALY which meant that second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib had less costs and better outcomes. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the results were most sensitive to the cost of brigatinib. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness versus delaying these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted revealed the robustness of this result, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios never exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold.

Using brigatinib as first-line treatment followed by lorlatinib for ALK-positive NSCLC may not be cost-effective given current pricing from the perspective of a United States payer. Delaying brigatinib followed by lorlatinib until subsequent lines of treatment may be a reasonable strategy that could limit healthcare costs without affecting clinical outcomes. More mature data are needed to better estimate cost-effectiveness in this setting.

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a serious and often fatal complication in patients with advanced lung cancer, resulting in significant neurological deficits, decreased quality of life, and a poor prognosis. This article summarizes current research advances in treating lung cancer with meningeal metastases, discusses clinical challenges, and explores treatment strategies. Through an extensive review of relevant clinical trial reports and screening of recent conference abstracts, we collected clinical data on treating patients with lung cancer with meningeal metastases to provide an overview of the current research progress. Exciting progress has been made by focusing on specific mutations within lung cancer, including the use of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or inhibitors for anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene rearrangement, such as osimertinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib. These targeted therapies have shown impressive results in penetrating the central nervous system (CNS). Regarding whole-brain radiotherapy, there is currently some controversy among investigators regarding its effect on survival. Additionally, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated reliable clinical benefits due to their ability to retain anticancer activity in CNS metastases. Moreover, combination therapy shows promise in providing further treatment possibilities. Considerable progress has been made in the clinical research of lung cancer with LM. However, the sample size of prospective clinical trials investigating LM for lung cancer is still limited, with most reports being retrospective. Developing more effective management protocols for metastatic LM in lung cancer remains an ongoing challenge for the future.

This review discusses the definitions, treatment modalities, management, future directions, and ongoing clinical trials of oligoprogressive disease in oncogene-driven and non-oncogene-driven NSCLC.

During the last decades, diagnostic and treatment modalities for oligometastatic NSCLC have advanced significantly, leading to improved survival. Additionally, our understanding of the tumor biology of oligoprogressive disease has expanded. However, despite the efforts of organizations, such as EORTC, ESTRO, and ASTRO proposing definitions for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease, heterogeneity in definitions persists in (ongoing) trials. Recognizing the significance of subclassification within oligoprogressive disease in NSCLC and the varying risks associated with subsequent metastatic spread, there is a call for tailored management strategies. A consensus on standardized criteria for the definition of oligoprogressive disease is urgently needed and will not only facilitate meaningful comparisons between studies but also pave the way for the development of personalized treatment plans that take into account the heterogeneous nature of oligoprogressive disease.

ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibit a particularly high propensity for the development of brain metastases. Current guidelines suggest transit to next-line therapy (SysTx) or local radiotherapy (RadTx) including whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery. However, the clinical impact of these two strategies remains unclear.

We conducted a retrospective analysis focusing on patients with stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent first-line ALK TKI treatment. Patients with intracranial progression may receive two different treatment strategies: SysTx and RadTx. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes associated with these two distinct treatment pathways.

A total 20 patients of ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKI therapy and subsequently developed intracranial progression were enrolled. About 55% of patients had brain metastasis initially. Nine patients (45%) were treated with crizotinib at first. Patients treated with crizotinib demonstrated a significantly shorter intracranial PFS1 (crizotinib: 8.27 months vs. others: 27.0 months, p = 0.006). Following intracranial progression, approximately 60% of patients transitioned to the next line of systemic treatment (SysTx), while the remaining 40% opted for local cranial radiotherapy (RadTx). Intriguingly, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in intracranial progression-free survival (PFS2) between these two distinct treatment strategies. (SysTx: 20.87 months vs. RadTx: 28.23 months, p = 0.461).

The intracranial progression-free survival showed no difference between the two strategies suggesting that both local radiotherapy and systemic therapy may be valid options. Individualized strategy, molecular analysis, and multidisciplinary conferences may all play a pivotal role in decision-making.

This study assessed real-world survival among older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs) at diagnosis (synchronous BM [SBM]) receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) compared with chemotherapy only.

Patients with NSCLC and SBM age 65 years or older at diagnosis from 2010 to 2019 SEER-Medicare database and received US Food and Drug Administration-approved ICIs (pembrolizumab/nivolumab/ipilimumab/atezolizumab/durvalumab/cemiplimab) and/or chemotherapy (platinum-based doublets/taxane/pemetrexed/gemcitabine) as first-line systemic treatment were included, excluding those with no cranial radiation or ever being treated with targeted therapies. Overall survival time was from the start of systemic treatment (ICI/chemotherapy) to death, censored at disenrollment from Medicare part A/B, enrollment in part C, or end of the study period (December 31, 2019). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were compared between treatment groups using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) between groups, adjusting for patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

The study included 1,481 patients (1,303 chemotherapy and 178 ICI). The median (range) age was 71 (65-91) years. First-line ICI patients were more likely to be older, live in urban areas, and less likely to be non-White than the chemotherapy group. KM estimates showed that survival curves initially overlapped but diverged approximately 6 months after initiating first-line systemic treatment (median survival [95% CI]: ICI, 190 [131 to 303] days versus chemotherapy, 189 [177 to 201] days), with ICI showing a better survival than the chemotherapy group (log-rank test P < .0001). First-line ICI was associated with a lower risk of death compared with chemotherapy in adjusted CPH model (HR [95% CI], 0.67 [0.55 to 0.80]; P < .0001).

Among older patients with NSCLC and SBM, first-line ICI use was associated with improved survival occurring 6 months after treatment initiation compared with chemotherapy only.

Although ALK-translocated (ALK+) advanced non-small cell lung cancers (aNSCLCs) are currently treated with second- or third-generation ALK inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), some patients respond durably to the first-generation ALK-TKI crizotinib.

This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics of these long-term responders.

This national, multicenter, retrospective, non-interventional study included patients with ALK+ aNSCLCs and long-term responses to first (L1)- or subsequent (≥ L2)-line crizotinib, defined, respectively, as treatments lasting > 18 and > 10 months. Median treatment duration (mDOT) was the primary endpoint.

A total of 85 patients (32 L1 and 53 ≥ L2 responders) from 23 centers were included (receiving crizotinib between 10/24/2011-10/02/2018): median age of 59 years, 83.6% non-smokers or ex-smokers, 85.9% performance status (PS) 0/1, 94.1% with adenocarcinomas, median of one metastatic site, and 22.4% with brain metastases (BMs). After median follow-up of 73.4 [95% confidence interval, 67.5-79.9] months, respective L1 and ≥ L2 mDOTs were 43.3 [26.7-56.8] and 29.6 [22.6-35.8] months, with overall survival (OS) not reached (NR) and 116.2 [83.4-NR] months. BM presence or absence did not affect mDOT (31.4 versus 32.9 months) but significantly impacted median OS (70.6 versus 158.6 months; p = 0.0008). Progression on crizotinib was paucisymptomatic (74.1%) and oligometastatic (34.8%), especially BMs (42.4%). After crizotinib discontinuation, 65 (76.5%) patients received subsequent systemic therapy: 57 (67.1%) with second-generation ALK-TKIs. Respective mDOTs of first- and second-line post-crizotinib ALK-TKIs lasted 19.4 [14.9-25.6] and 11.1 [4.8-17.9] months, respectively.

Most ALK+ aNSCLC patients with prolonged crizotinib efficacy had paucisymptomatic and oligometastatic disease without BMs. They subsequently benefited from a sequential strategy with other ALK-TKIs.

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a serious complication of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the incidence of LM has been increasing yearly in recent times. There is no consensus on the best treatment modality for LM, which underscores a difficult problem in the management of advanced NSCLC patients. The existing treatments include molecular targeted therapy, systemic chemotherapy, local radiotherapy, antivascular tumor therapy, intrathecal chemotherapy, and immunotherapy, but their efficacy is not satisfactory. In this article, we briefly describe the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of NSCLC-LM and discuss progress regarding evaluation of the efficacy of LM treatment to better provide a necessary reference for clinical practice and clinical trial evaluation.

Cancer is a major threat to human life around the globe, and the discovery of novel biomolecules continue to be an urgent therapeutic need that is still unmet. Precision medicine relies on targeted therapeutic strategies. Researchers are better equipped to develop therapies that target proteins as they understand more about the genetic alterations and molecules that cause progression of cancer. There has been a recent diversification of the sorts of targets exploited in treatment. Therapeutic antibody and biotechnology advancements enabled curative treatments to reach previously inaccessible sites. New treatment strategies have been initiated for several undruggable targets. The application of tailored therapy has been proven to have efficient results in controlling cancer progression. Novel biomolecules like SMDCs, ADCs, mABs, and PROTACS has gained vast attention in the recent years. Several studies have shown that using these novel technology helps in reducing the drug dosage as well as to overcome drug resistance in different cancer types. Therefore, it is crucial to fully untangle the mechanism and collect evidence to understand the significance of these novel drug targets and strategies. This review article will be discussing the importance and role of these novel biomolecules in targeted cancer therapies.

The improved survival outcomes of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), largely owing to the improved control of systemic disease provided by immune-checkpoint inhibitors and novel targeted therapies, have highlighted the challenges posed by central nervous system (CNS) metastases as a devastating yet common complication, with up to 50% of patients developing such lesions during the course of the disease. Early-generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) often provide robust systemic disease control in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLCs, although these agents are usually unable to accumulate to therapeutically relevant concentrations in the CNS owing to an inability to cross the blood-brain barrier. However, the past few years have seen a paradigm shift with the emergence of several novel or later-generation TKIs with improved CNS penetrance. Such agents have promising levels of activity against brain metastases, as demonstrated by data from preclinical and clinical studies. In this Review, we describe current preclinical and clinical evidence of the intracranial activity of TKIs targeting various oncogenic drivers in patients with NSCLC, with a focus on newer agents with enhanced CNS penetration, leptomeningeal disease and the need for intrathecal treatment options. We also discuss evolving assessment criteria and regulatory considerations for future clinical investigations.

The development of targeted therapies has revolutionized cancer treatment, offering improved efficacy with reduced side effects compared with traditional chemotherapy. This review highlights the current landscape of targeted therapy in lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and prostate cancer, focusing on key molecular targets. Moreover, it aligns with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and drug candidates. In lung cancer, mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have emerged as significant targets. FDA-approved drugs like osimertinib and crizotinib specifically inhibit these aberrant pathways, providing remarkable benefits in patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-positive lung cancer. Colorectal cancer treatment has been shaped by targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and EGFR. Bevacizumab and cetuximab are prominent FDA-approved agents that hinder VEGF and EGFR signaling, significantly enhancing outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. In prostate cancer, androgen receptor (AR) targeting is pivotal. Drugs like enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide effectively inhibit AR signaling, demonstrating efficacy in castration-resistant prostate cancer. This review further highlights promising targets like mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), ROS1, BRAF, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymeras (PARP) in specific cancer subsets, along with ongoing clinical trials that continue to shape the future of targeted therapy.

This observational study describes the real-world economic burden in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving a first-line ALK inhibitor, and the economic impact of brain metastases (BM).

Administrative claims data (Truven Health MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters database and Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits database; January 1, 2015-March 31, 2020) for adult patients with ALK+ NSCLC who received a first-line ALK inhibitor were retrospectively reviewed. Healthcare costs and resource utilization were calculated on a per-patient-per-month (PPPM) basis and stratified by the presence or absence of BM prior to first-line ALK inhibitor. Factors associated with costs were identified.

A total of 496 patients were eligible for analysis. Mean PPPM total healthcare costs were $21,961 for all patients receiving up to 1 year of a first-line ALK inhibitor. Patients were significantly more likely to have higher mean PPPM total costs if they had BM prior to first-line ALK inhibitor (vs. no BM; odds ratio: 1.11; 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.21; p = 0.013). Mean PPPM days of hospital stay (p = 0.0056), and inpatient hospital visits (p = 0.0030) were significantly higher for patients with BM compared to no BM. The main cost drivers for non-inpatient procedures for all patients were medications, radiation therapy, and other diagnostic procedures.

The economic burden in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving a first-line ALK inhibitor was high. Patients with ALK+ NSCLC and BM had higher healthcare costs and resource utilization than patients without BM.

The role for radiotherapy or surgery in the upfront management of brain metastases (BrM) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFRm) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is uncertain because of a lack of prospective evidence supporting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy. Further understanding of practice heterogeneity is necessary to guide collaborative efforts in establishing guideline recommendations.

We conducted an international survey among medical (MO), clinical (CO), and radiation oncologists (RO), as well as neurosurgeons (NS), of treatment recommendations for asymptomatic BrM (in non-eloquent regions) EGFRm or ALK+ NSCLC patients according to specific clinical scenarios. We grouped and compared treatment recommendations according to specialty. Responses were summarized using counts and percentages and analyzed using the Fisher exact test.

A total of 449 surveys were included in the final analysis: 48 CO, 85 MO, 60 NS, and 256 RO. MO and CO were significantly more likely than RO and NS to recommend first-line TKI monotherapy, regardless of the number and/or size of asymptomatic BrM (in non-eloquent regions). Radiotherapy in addition to TKI as first-line management was preferred by all specialties for patients with ≥4 BrM. NS recommended surgical resection more often than other specialties for BrM measuring >2 cm.

Recommendations for the management of BrM from EGFRm or ALK+ NSCLC vary significantly according to oncology sub-specialties. Development of multidisciplinary guidelines and further research on establishing optimal treatment strategies is warranted.

To date, no direct comparisons have compared the effectiveness of all ALK inhibitors (ALKis) against ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ALKis in ALK-positive NSCLC.

The effectiveness of ALKis was evaluated by assessing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and PFS with baseline brain metastasis (BM). The serious adverse events (SAEs: Grade ≥ 3) and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were pooled to evaluate safety. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison between all ALKis by using a Bayesian model.

Twelve eligible trials including seven treatments were identified. All of the ALKis improved PFS and ORR relative to chemotherapy. Consistent with alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and ensartinib showed significant differences versus crizotinib and ceritinib. Lorlatinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with alectinib (0.64, 0.37 to 1.07), brigatinib (0.56, 0.3 to 1.05), and ensartinib (0.53, 0.28 to 1.02). No significant difference was found among them in OS except for alectinib versus crizotinib. Moreover, alectinib was significantly more effective than crizotinib (1.54, 1.02 to 2.5) in achieving the best ORR. Subgroup analyses based on BM indicated that PFS was dramatically lengthened by lorlatinib. Compared with other ALKis, alectinib notably reduced the rate of SAEs. There was no striking difference between discontinuation for AEs, except for ceritinib versus crizotinib. The ranking of validity showed that lorlatinib had the longest PFS (98.32%) and PFS with BM (85.84%) and the highest ORR (77.01%). The rank of probabilities showed that alectinib had the potentially best safety in terms of SAEs (97.85%), and ceritinib had less discontinuation (95.45%).

Alectinib was the first choice for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and even for those with BM, whereas lorlatinib was the second choice. Long-term follow-up and prospective studies are warranted to compare ALKis and to verify our conclusions directly.

This review will provide an overview of EGFR and ERBB2 mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a focus on recent clinical approvals.

We obtained data from the literature in accordance with narrative review reporting guidelines.

EGFR mutations are present in up to 15-20% of all NSCLCs; amongst these, 10% correspond to kinase domain insertions in exon 20. Structurally similar, ERBB2 (HER2) mutations occurs in 1-4% of NSCLCs, mostly consisting of insertions or point mutations. The majority of EGFR exon 20 insertions occur within the loop following the regulatory C-helix and activate the kinase domain of EGFR without generating a therapeutic window to gefitinib, erlotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib or osimertinib. Mobocertinib represents a novel class of covalent EGFR inhibitors with a modest therapeutic window to these mutants and induces anti-tumor responses in a portion of patients [at 160 mg/day: response rate of <30% with duration of response (DoR) >17 months and progression-free survival (PFS) of >7 months] albeit with mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal toxicities. The bi-specific EGFR-MET antibody amivantamab-vmjw has modest but broad preclinical activity in EGFR-driven cancers and specifically for EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated NSCLC has response rates <40% and PFS of <8.5 months at the cost of both infusion-related plus on-target toxicities. Both drugs were approved in 2021. The clinical development of kinase inhibitors for ERBB2-mutated NSCLC has been thwarted by mucocutaneous/gastrointestinal toxicities that preclude a pathway for drug approval, as the case of poziotinib. However, the activation of ERBB2 has allowed for repurposing of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) that target ERBB2 with cytotoxic payloads. The FDA approved fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki in 2022 for NSCLC based on response rate of >55%, DoR >9 months, PFS >8 months and manageable adverse events (including cytopenias, nausea and less commonly pneumonitis). Other therapies in clinical development include sunvozertinib and zipalertinib, among others. In addition, traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy has some activity in these tumors.

The approvals of mobocertinib, amivantamab, and trastuzumab deruxtecan represent the first examples of precision oncology for EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated and ERBB2-mutated NSCLCs.

The morbidity and mortality of lung cancer rank the first among all kinds of cancer. In China, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive pulmonary tumors account for nearly 5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and these patients are quite likely to develop brain metastases, as high as around 45%. Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors crizotinib and alectinib have proved effective for controlling tumor metastases to the brain, drug resistance and disease progression cannot be ignored in the course of treatment.

Most of the literature reports that traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) has produced satisfactory results in the treatment of cancer patients as an adjuvant treatment for various malignancies in a 53-year-old male patient who developed advanced NSCLC with brain metastases. As first-line crizotinib and erlotinib treatments were ineffective and the intracranial lesions progressed extensively, the patient chose to receive TCM treatment alone in the hope of prolonging his life and improving his quality of life.

A 53-year-old male patient who developed advanced NSCLC with brain metastasis. Because first-line crizotinib and alectinib have failed, and the intracranial lesions progressed in a large area.

The patient requested that the final therapeutic strategy be Chinese medicine as monotherapy for long-term treatment. The patient took 30 mL of the decoction 1 hour after a meal, 3 times a day. The patient was not treated with dehydrating agents or diuretics during the TCM treatment.

The improvement was obvious after 3 months of treatment, and significant reduction of cranial lesions. During the follow-up period, the patient developed neither severe liver damage nor kidney damage.

This case is the first 1 in the world where TCM was introduced as monotherapy for severe conditions with extensive brain metastases and achieved remarkable efficacy.

Metastasis poses a major challenge in cancer management, including EML4-ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As cell migration is a critical step during metastasis, we assessed the anti-migratory activities of several clinical ALK inhibitors in NSCLC cells and observed differential anti-migratory capabilities despite similar ALK inhibition, with brigatinib displaying superior anti-migratory effects over other ALK inhibitors. Applying an unbiased in situ mass spectrometry-based chemoproteomics approach, we determined the proteome-wide target profile of brigatinib in EML4-ALK+ NSCLC cells. Dose-dependent and cross-competitive chemoproteomics suggested MARK2 and MARK3 as relevant brigatinib kinase targets. Functional validation showed that combined pharmacological inhibition or genetic modulation of MARK2/3 inhibited cell migration. Consistently, brigatinib treatment induced inhibitory YAP1 phosphorylation downstream of MARK2/3. Collectively, our data suggest that brigatinib exhibits unusual cross-phenotype polypharmacology as, despite similar efficacy for inhibiting EML4-ALK-dependent cell proliferation as other ALK inhibitors, it more effectively prevented migration of NSCLC cells due to co-targeting of MARK2/3.

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) at diagnosis is rare and leads to poor prognosis with the use of the standard ALCL99 protocol alone. CNS-directed intensive chemotherapy, such as an increased dose of intravenous MTX, increased dose of dexamethasone, intensified intrathecal therapy, and high-dose cytarabine, followed by cranial irradiation, has been shown to improve survival in this population. In this paper, the authors describe a 14-year-old male with an intracranial ALCL mass at onset who received CNS-directed chemotherapy followed by 23.4 Gy of whole-brain irradiation. After the first systemic relapse, the CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor, alectinib, was applied; it has successfully maintained remission for 18 months without any adverse events. CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor therapy might prevent CNS relapse in pediatric ALK-positive ALCL. Next-generation ALK inhibitors could be introduced as a promising treatment option, even for primary ALCL with CNS involvement, which could lead to the omission of cranial irradiation and avoid radiation-induced sequalae. Further evidence of CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor combined therapy for primary ALK-positive ALCL is warranted to reduce radiation-induced sequalae in future treatments.

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) is one of the most frequent metastatic sites for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is a matter of debate whether EGFR mutation in the primary tumor may be a marker for the disease course, prognosis, and diagnostic imaging of BMs, comparable to that described for primary brain tumors, such as glioblastoma (GB). This issue was investigated in the present research manuscript. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to identify the relevance of EGFR mutations and prognostic factors for diagnostic imaging, survival, and disease course within a cohort of patients affected by NSCLC-BMs. Imaging was carried out using MRI at various time intervals. The disease course was assessed using a neurological exam carried out at three-month intervals. The survival was expressed from surgical intervention. Results: The patient cohort consisted of 81 patients. The overall survival of the cohort was 15 ± 1.7 months. EGFR mutation and ALK expression did not differ significantly for age, gender, and gross morphology of the BM. Contrariwise, the EGFR mutation was significantly associated with MRI concerning the occurrence of greater tumor (22.38 ± 21.35 cm³ versus 7.68 ± 6.44 cm³, p = 0.046) and edema volume (72.44 ± 60.71 cm³ versus 31.92 cm³, p = 0.028). In turn, the occurrence of MRI abnormalities was related to neurological symptoms assessed using the Karnofsky performance status and mostly depended on tumor-related edema (p = 0.048). However, the highest significant correlation was observed between EGFR mutation and the occurrence of seizures as the clinical onset of the neoplasm (p = 0.004). Conclusions: The presence of EGFR mutations significantly correlates with greater edema and mostly a higher seizure incidence of BMs from NSCLC. In contrast, EGFR mutations do not affect the patient's survival, the disease course, and focal neurological symptoms but seizures. This contrasts with the significance of EGFR in the course and prognosis of the primary tumor (NSCLC).

This study compares the safety and efficacy of first-line treatments for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Abstracts related to lung cancer presented at important international conferences were also reviewed. Randomized clinical trials that qualified the inclusion criteria were subjected to Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematically reviewed.

The authors included a total of nine studies including 2441 patients and seven first-line treatments (ensartinib, brigatinib, crizotinib, lorlatinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy). Overall, lorlatinib appeared to confer the best progression-free survival (PFS) (probability of being the best [Prbest], 90%; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 98%), and the same conclusion was obtained on paired comparisons (lorlatinib vs. ceritinib [hazard ratio (HR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20-0.47); lorlatinib vs. chemotherapy [HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12-0.23]; crizotinib vs. lorlatinib [HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.4-5.2]; and brigatinib vs. lorlatinib [HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8]). Alectinib conferred the best overall survival (OS) and safety profile. In the Asian population, ensartinib conferred the best PFS (Prbest 50%, SUCRA 87%), and for patients with brain metastases at baseline, lorlatinib showed the best PFS (Prbest 70%, SUCRA 93%).

For first-line treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, lorlatinib was associated with the best PFS and objective response rate, but poorer safety profile, whereas alectinib demonstrated the best OS and safety profile. In Asians, ensartinib conferred the best PFS benefit, and in the brain baseline metastasis population, lorlatinib conferred the best PFS benefit.

Among the many molecularly targeted drugs currently used to treat anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, lorlatinib may be one of the most effective targeted drugs. Lung cancer has long been at the top of cancer rankings in terms of incidence and mortality. Today, the treatment of lung cancer has moved into the era of precision therapy. In this article, we use a statistical approach to compare the efficacy and safety of targeted drugs that have been used in the first-line treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations to improve the reference for clinicians to make treatment decisions in the real world.

The EML4 (echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4)-ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) fusion gene in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was first identified in 2007. As the EML4-ALK fusion protein promotes carcinogenesis in lung cells, much attention has been paid to it, leading to the development of therapies for patients with NSCLC. These therapies include ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors and heat shock protein 90 inhibitors. However, detailed information on the entire structure and function of the EML4-ALK protein remains deficient, and there are many obstacles to overcome in the development of novel anticancer agents. In this review, we describe the respective partial structures of EML4 and ALK that are known to date. In addition to their structures, noteworthy structural features and launched inhibitors of the EML4-ALK protein are summarized. Furthermore, based on the structural features and inhibitor-binding modes, we discuss strategies for the development of novel inhibitors targeting the EML4-ALK protein.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is frequently complicated by central nervous system (CNS) metastases affecting patients' life expectancy and quality. At the present clinical trials including neurosurgery, radiotherapy (RT) and systemic treatments alone or in combination have provided controversial results. CNS involvement is even more frequent in NSCLC patients with EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement suggesting a role of target therapy in the upfront treatment in place of loco-regionals treatments (i.e. RT and/or surgery). So far clinical research has not explored the potential role of accurate brain imaging (i.e. MRI instead of the routine total-body contrast CT and/or PET/CT staging) to identify patients that could benefit of local therapies. Moreover, for patients who require concomitant RT there are no clear guidelines on the timing of intervention with respect to innovative precision medicine approaches with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, ALK-inhibitors and/or immuno-oncological therapies. On this basis the present review describes the therapeutic strategies integrating medical and radiation oncology in patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) adenocarcinoma with CNS involvement and EGFR activating mutations or ALK rearrangement.

First-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) whose tumors harbour anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements have rapidly evolved from chemotherapy, to the first in class ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) crizotinib in 2011, and now include no fewer than five Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ALK inhibitors. However, while superiority to crizotinib has been established, head-to-head clinical trials comparing newer generation ALK inhibitors are lacking, and decisions on optimal first-line treatment must be based on analysis of the relevant trials, with attention to systemic and intracranial efficacy, toxicity profile as well as consideration of patient factors and preferences. Here we aim to synthesise findings from review of these trials and to describe options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ NSCLC.

A literature review of relevant randomised clinical trials was undertaken using Embase database. There were no limitations to time frame or language applied.

Crizotinib was established as the standard of care first-line treatment for patients with ALK+ aNSCLC in 2011. Since this time, alectinib, brigatinib, ensartinib and lorlatinib have all demonstrated superiority as first-line treatments compared to crizotinib, based on progression free survival, intra-cranial efficacy, and side-effect profiles.

Options for optimal first-line treatment for ALK+ aNSCLC include alectinib, brigatinib and lorlatinib. This review serves as a resource summarizing data from key clinical trials with ALK inhibitors to aid in decision making when tailoring treatment for patients. Future research in the field includes real world analysis of efficacy and toxicity of next-generation ALK-inhibitors, identification of mechanisms of tumor persistence and acquired resistance, development of novel ALK inhibitors, and use of ALK-TKIs in earlier stage disease.

Lung cancer is commonly associated with brain metastasis formation, and certain subtypes, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearranged disease, have an especially high propensity for early and frequent central nervous system (CNS) involvement for which treatment can be challenging. Historical management has centered on surgery and radiation therapy (RT), which persist as mainstays of treatment for large, symptomatic lesions and widespread CNS disease. To date, sustained disease control remains elusive, and the role for effective systemic adjunctive therapies is clear. Here we discuss the epidemiology, genomics, pathophysiology, identification, and management of lung cancer brain metastases with a particular emphasis on systemic treatment of ALK-positive disease according to the best available evidence.

Review of PubMed and Google Scholar databases as well as ClinicalTrials.gov provided background and seminal trials for the local and systemic management of ALK rearranged lung cancer brain metastases.

The development of effective, CNS-penetrant systemic agents-including alectinib, brigatinib, ceritinib, and lorlatinib-has dramatically changed the management and prevention of ALK rearranged brain metastases. Most notably, there is a burgeoning role for upfront systemic therapy for both symptomatic and incidentally discovered lesions.

Novel targeted therapies offer patients a pathway to delay, obviate, or supplement traditional local therapies while minimizing neurologic sequelae of treatment and may reduce the risk of brain metastasis formation. However, the selection of patients to whom local and targeted treatments is offered is not trivial, and the risks and benefits of both must be weighed carefully. More work is needed to establish treatment regimens that yield durable intra- and extracranial disease control.

Healthcare administrative databases represent a valuable source for real-life data analysis. The primary aim of this study is to compare effectiveness and cost profile in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring synchronous brain metastases (BMs) who received non-chemo first-line systemic therapy with or without advanced radiotherapy (aRT).

Diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were used for identifying all patients with a new diagnosis of lung cancer between 2012 and 2019. Among these, patients who had started a first-line systemic treatment with either TKIs or pembrolizumab, alone or in combination with intensity-modulated or stereotactic RT, were selected. Clinical outcomes investigated included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-treatment failure (TTF). The cost outcome was defined as the average per capita cumulative healthcare direct costs of the treatment, including all inpatient and outpatient costs.

The final cohort included 177 patients, of whom 58 were treated with systemic treatment plus aRT (STRT) and 119 with systemic treatment alone. The addition of aRT to systemic treatment was associated with a significantly better OS (p = 0.020) and PFS (p = 0.041) than systemic therapy alone. The ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) value indicated an average cost of €3792 for each month of survival after STRT treatment and confirmed clinical effectiveness but higher healthcare costs.

This real-world study suggests that upfront aRT for NCLSC patients with synchronous BMs represents a valid treatment strategy, boosting the efficacy of novel and emerging drug classes with sustainable costs for the health service.

The present real-world study reports that the use of upfront advanced radiotherapyaRT and new-generation systemic agents, such as TKIs and pembrolizumab, may have higher oncological control and an improved cost-effectiveness profile than the use of new-generation systemic agents alone in NCLSC patients with synchronous brain metastases. Acquired evidence can also be used to inform policymakers that adding advanced radiotherapy results is a sustainable cost for the health service. Since approximately 50% of patients do not meet RCT inclusion criteria, a significant proportion of them is receiving treatment that is not evidence-informed; therefore, these results warrant further studies to identify the best radiotherapy timing and possible dose escalation approaches to improving treatment efficacy in patient subgroups not typically represented in randomized controlled trials.