Despite liver transplantation (LT) is considered the optimal treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients with impaired liver function, the shortage of donors has forced the application of very restrictive criteria for selecting ideal candidates for whom LT can offer the best outcome. With the evolving LT landscape due to the advent of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and the steady increase in donors, major efforts have been made to expand the transplant eligibility criteria for HCC. In addition, the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of HCC, with demonstrated efficacy in earlier stages, has revolutionized the therapeutic approach for these patients, and their integration in the setting of LT is challenging. Management of immunological compromise from ICIs, including the wash-out period before LT and post-LT immunosuppression adjustments, is crucial to balance the risk of graft rejection against HCC recurrence. Additionally, the effects of increased immunosuppression on non-hepatic complications must be understood to prevent them from becoming obstacles to long-term OS.

In this review, we will evaluate the emerging evidence and its implications for the future of LT in HCC. Addressing these novel challenges and opportunities, while integrating the current clinical evidence with predictive algorithms, would ensure a fair balance between individual patient needs and the overall population benefit in the LT system.

Recently, there has been an increasing interest in investigating the potential benefits or risks associated with using immunosuppressants for treating specific tumors post organ transplantation, with a focus on selecting appropriate drugs, doses, and treatment protocols. This study used bibliometric analysis to evaluate research trends and hotspots in this field.

A systematic search was conducted on the Web of Science to identify studies focusing immunosuppressants and cancer following organ transplantation from 2001 to 2023. The search strategy utilized a variety of the keywords including "immunosuppressants", "cancer" and "transplant". Data extraction involved recording various parameters such as title, author, institution, country, publication, citation, H-index, immunosuppressant, and type of transplantation.

The analysis encompassed a total of 94 studies. The findings revealed that the period from 2005 to 2010 emerged as the most influential timeframe within this research. The United States ranked highest in the number of publications, with Vivarelli M identified as the most productive author, and the University of Bologna recognized as the most productive institute. "Immunosuppression", "rapamycin" and "kidney" were identified as the key hotspots within this field. Notably, rapamycin was identified as the predominant immunosuppressant and kidney transplantation emerged as the most prominent type of transplantation.

While immunosuppressants have been extensively utilized in organ transplant procedures, certain associated cancer risks have not been well addressed. Further long-term monitoring studies are required for numerous immunosuppressants to elucidate precise applications and potential implications for solid-organ transplant recipients.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard of care for both end-stage liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Side effects of the main used immunosuppressive drugs have a noteworthy impact on the long-term outcome of LT recipients. Consequently, to achieve a balance between optimal immunosuppression and minimal side effects is a cornerstone of the post-LT period. Today, there are no validated markers for overimmunosuppression and underimmunosuppression, only a few drugs have therapeutic drug monitoring, and immunosuppression regimens vary from center to center and from country to country. Currently, there are many drugs with different efficacy and safety profiles. Using different agents permits a decrease in the dosage and minimizes the toxicities. A small subset of recipients achieves immunotolerance with the chance to stop immunosuppressive therapy. This article focuses on the side effects of immunosuppressive drugs, which significantly impact long-term outcomes for LT recipients. The primary aim is to highlight the balance between achieving effective immunosuppression and minimizing adverse effects, emphasizing the role of personalized therapeutic strategies. Moreover, this review evaluates the mechanisms of action and specific complications associated with immunosuppressive agents. Finally, special attention is given to strategies for reducing immunosuppressive burdens, improving patient quality of life, and identifying immunotolerant individuals.

The Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology established the second consensus report to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice 7 years after the first version was published in 2016. This version provides information focused on new developments that have arisen in the last 7 years. For the general aspects of the pharmacology and TDM of EVR that have retained their relevance, readers can refer to the 2016 document. This edition includes new evidence from the literature, focusing on the topics updated during the last 7 years, including indirect pharmacological effects of EVR on the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 with the major mechanism of direct inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. In addition, various concepts and technical options to monitor EVR concentrations, improve analytical performance, and increase the number of options available for immunochemical analytical methods have been included. Only limited new pharmacogenetic information regarding EVR has emerged; however, pharmacometrics and model-informed precision dosing have been constructed using physiological parameters as covariates, including pharmacogenetic information. In clinical settings, EVR is combined with a decreased dose of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, instead of mycophenolic acid. The literature and recommendations for specific organ transplantations, such as that of the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, as well as for oncology and pediatrics have been updated. EVR TDM for pancreatic and islet transplantation has been added to this edition. The pharmacodynamic monitoring of EVR in organ transplantation has also been updated. These updates and additions, along with the previous version of this consensus document, will be helpful to clinicians and researchers treating patients receiving EVR.

The evolving field of liver transplant (LT) oncology calls for tailored immunosuppression protocols to minimize the risk of tumor recurrence. We systematically reviewed the available evidence from inception to May 2023 regarding immunosuppression protocols used in patients undergoing LT for cholangiocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumors (NET), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma, and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) to identify common practices and to evaluate their association with oncological outcomes. Studies not involving humans, case reports, and short case series (ie, n < 10) were excluded. Among 3374 screened references, we included 117 studies involving 6797 patients distributed as follows: cholangiocarcinoma (58.1%), NETs (18.8%), hepatic-endothelial hemangioendothelioma (7.7%), CRLM (6.8%), mixed neoplasms (6.8%), or others (1.7%). Only 41% of the studies disclosed details of the immunosuppression protocol, and 20.8% of studies provided drug trough concentrations during follow-up. The immunosuppression protocols described were heterogeneous and broadly mirrored routine practices for nontumoral indications. The only exception was CRLM, where tacrolimus minimization-or even withdrawal-in combination with inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) were consistently reported. None of the studies evaluated the relationship between the immunosuppression protocol and oncological outcomes. In conclusion, based on low-quality and indirect scientific evidence, patients with tumoral indications for LT should receive the lowest tacrolimus level tolerated under close surveillance. The combination with mTORi titrated to achieve the top therapeutic range of trough concentrations could allow complete tacrolimus withdrawal. This approach may be particularly useful in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and CRLM, in whom tumor recurrence is the main cause of death. We propose a tool for reporting immunosuppression protocols, which could be implemented in future transplant oncology studies.

With the advances in transplant oncology in recent years, the role of liver transplantation has expanded to make curative treatment a possibility for a wider patient population. We highlight strategies in Hong Kong, China that have enabled preoperative prognostication for judicious patient selection, downstaging therapy to definitive treatment, and postoperative therapies that have provided a growing role for liver transplantation in patients with more advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the standard-of-care for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current selection criteria depend primarily on measures of tumor burden and alpha-fetoprotein levels. Evolving strategies include the application of prognostic scores and the development of specialized molecular markers to predict recurrence. New technologies such as machine perfusion of donor organs are expected to dramatically improve the availability and access to LT in HCC.

The potential of everolimus (EVR) in reducing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) among recipients following liver transplantation has been reported. This nationwide population-based quasi-cohort study investigated whether combining EVR with calcineurin inhibitor therapy affects the risk of HCC and extrahepatic cancers compared to a time duration-matched cohort of recipients not receiving EVR. Using data covering the entire population from Korea, liver transplant recipients who had initiated immunosuppressants between June 2015 and February 2020 were included, and divided into 2 groups: the EVR combination and noncombination groups. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and absolute risk reduction for the risk of HCC and extrahepatic cancer with EVR combination therapy using a Cox regression model. A time duration-matched retrospective cohort of 932 recipients in both of the groups was identified. The EVR combination group showed a lower risk of HCC (aHR, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.94) and extrahepatic cancers (aHR, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.63) compared to the noncombination group. The absolute risk reduction was 0.004 for HCC and 0.012 for extrahepatic cancer. The findings suggest that adding EVR to calcineurin inhibitor therapy reduces cancer risk in liver transplant recipients, highlighting the importance of considering cancer risk when choosing immunosuppressive therapies.

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Liver transplantation (LT) is a key treatment for primary and secondary liver cancers, reducing tumor burden with concurrent improvement of liver function. While significant improvement in survival is noted with LT, cancer recurrence rates remain high. Mitochondrial dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to drive tumor recurrence by creating a favorable microenvironment rich in pro-inflammatory and angiogenic factors. Therefore, strategies that decrease reperfusion injury and mitochondrial dysfunction may also decrease cancer recurrence following LT. Machine perfusion techniques are increasingly used in routine clinical practice of LT with improved post-transplant outcomes and increased use of marginal grafts. Normothermic (NMP) and hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) provide oxygen to ischemic tissues, and impact IRI and potential cancer recurrence through different mechanisms. This article discussed the link between IRI-associated inflammation and tumor recurrence after LT. The current literature was screened for the role of machine perfusion as a strategy to mitigate the risk of cancer recurrence. Upfront NMP ("ischemia free organ transplantation") and end-ischemic HOPE were shown to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in retrospective studies. Three prospective randomized controlled trials are ongoing in Europe to provide robust evidence on the impact of HOPE on cancer recurrence in LT.

To investigate the use of maintenance immunosuppressive treatments following liver transplantation and to compare their risk-benefit profiles in clinical practice.

Retrospective multicentrer cohort study.

Four Italian regions (Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio, Sardinia).

Data were integrated from the national transplant information system and administrative claims data from four Italian regions. All adults who underwent incident liver transplantation between 2009 and 2019 were identified and categorised into two groups: cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The trend of immunosuppressive treatment over years was analysed, and their effectiveness/safety profiles were compared using multivariate Cox models (HR; 95% CI).

Mortality, transplant reject/graft failure, incidence of severe infections, cancer, diabetes, major adverse cardiovascular events and lipid-modifying agents use.

The study comprised 750 subjects in the cirrhosis cohort and 1159 in the HCC cohort. Over the study years, there was a decline in the use of cyclosporine-CsA, while combination therapy involving tacrolimus with other drugs increased compared with monotherapy. Overall, tacrolimus monotherapy use was slightly over 40% in both groups, followed by tacrolimus+mycophenolate (39.5%-cirrhosis; 30.6%-HCC) and tacrolimus+molecular target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) (8.5%-cirrhosis; 13.3%-HCC). No significant differences emerged in risk-benefit profile of different tacrolimus-based therapies, except for a higher risk of mortality in cirrhosis subjects under tacrolimus monotherapy compared with tacrolimus+mycophenolate (HR: 2.07; 1.17 to 3.65).

The study highlights a shift over time in postliver transplant therapeutic patterns, favouring the use of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate or mTORi, rather than monotherapy. Moreover, a potential association between tacrolimus monotherapy and increased mortality in the cirrhosis cohort was identified. Further research is warranted to investigate these findings more deeply and to optimise treatment strategies for liver transplant recipients.

Immunosuppressive medications play a crucial role in determining both organ and patient survival following liver transplantation (LT). Typically, immunosuppressive protocols for pediatric LT patients rely on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs). While inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in adult recipients of liver allografts, such as improved renal function post-LT, their application in pediatric liver transplant recipients is a subject of debate due to uncertain efficacy and potential adverse effects.

This review evaluates the potential roles of mTOR inhibitors in the context of pediatric LT patients.

This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol for conduct and reporting. Databases until 31 August 2023 were searched using specific terms and keywords. All clinical studies focusing on mTOR inhibitors in pediatric LT were included.

Out of 888 identified articles, 30 studies, involving 386 children who had undergone liver transplantation and received mTOR-inhibitor-based immunosuppressive regimens, met the inclusion criteria. The beneficial impacts of switching from a CNI to an mTOR inhibitor or adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI-reduced immunosuppression in LT pediatric patients with impaired kidney function are controversial, and high-powered clinical studies are need. It appears that enhancing immunosuppression by adding an mTOR inhibitor to CNI is helpful for pediatric LT recipients who are experiencing refractory acute rejection or chronic rejection. mTOR-inhibitor-containing regimens failed to reduce the occurrence of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) among children with LT that may be due to concomitant high CNI concentration among studied patients. The effectiveness of mTOR inhibitors in treating PTLD remains uncertain; however, in patients with PTLD who are at high risk of rejection, mTOR inhibitors may be administered. Conversion to or the addition of mTOR inhibitors to maintenance immunosuppression seems to be suitable for pediatric patients who received a transplant due to hepatic malignancies such as hepatoblastoma or hepatocellular carcinoma or for those with post-transplant primary or recurrent malignancies. Switching to an mTOR inhibitor may improve some CNI-related adverse effects such as gingival hyperplasia, neurotoxicity, nephropathy, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or thrombotic microangiopathy.

Although the exact role of mTOR inhibitors among pediatric patients who have received a liver transplant needs further study, two algorithms are presented in this review to guide conversion from CNIs to mTOR inhibitors or the addition of mTOR inhibitor to a CNI-minimization immunosuppressive regimen for pediatric patients who may benefit from this class of drugs. This review mainly consisted of retrospective studies with inadequate sample sizes and lacked a control group, which represents the main limitation of this study.

Evaluating the safety and efficacy of implanting a liver with islet grafts into patients with end-stage liver disease and diabetes mellitus (DM).

DM and end-stage liver diseases are significant health concern worldwide, often coexisting and mutually influencing each other. Addressing both diseases simultaneously is paramount.

We utilized the islet transplantation combined ischemia-free liver transplantation (ITIFLT) technique to treat a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The liver was procured and preserved using the ischemia-free liver transplantation (IFLT) technique, and during normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), isolated and purified islet grafts were transplanted into the liver through the portal vein. Finally, the liver, incorporating with the transplant islet grafts, was implanted into the recipient without interruption of blood supply.

The patient received both liver and islet graft from the same donor. The patient achieved insulin-independence by post-transplant day (PTD) 9, and both liver and islet function remained robust. The patient was discharged on PTD 18 and experienced no surgical or transplantation-related complications during the follow-up period. Furthermore, islet grafts presence was observed in liver biopsies after islet transplantation.

This landmark case marks the inaugural application of ITIFLT in humans, signifying its potential as a promising treatment modality for end-stage liver disease with DM.

Liver transplantation (LT) remains one of the most effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and significantly enhances patient survival. However, the application of LT for HCC faces challenges owing to advancements in cancer-specific treatment modalities and the increased burden of patients' comorbidities. This narrative review explores current controversies and advancements in LT for HCC. Key areas of focus include the management of comorbidities and patient education by advanced practice nurses, impacts of frailty on waitlists and post-LT outcomes, selection criteria for LT in the era of new downstaging tools, role of radiology in patient selection, and implications of potential immunotherapy use both before and after LT. Additionally, the importance of immunosuppression management with strategies aimed at minimizing rejection while considering the risk of HCC recurrence and the role of surveillance for HCC recurrence is highlighted. This review also underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for optimizing outcomes in patients with HCC undergoing LT.

Liver transplantation is known to generate significant inflammation in the entire organ based on the metabolic profile and the tissue's ability to recover from the ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). This cascade contributes to post-transplant complications, affecting both the synthetic liver function (immediate) and the scar development in the biliary tree. The new occurrence of biliary strictures, and the recurrence of malignant and benign liver diseases, such as cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), are direct consequences linked to this inflammation. The accumulation of toxic metabolites, such as succinate, causes undirected electron flows, triggering the releases of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from a severely dysfunctional mitochondrial complex 1. This initiates the inflammatory IRI cascade, with subsequent ischemic biliary stricturing, and the upregulation of pro-tumorigenic signaling. Such inflammation is both local and systemic, promoting an immunocompromised status that can lead to the recurrence of underlying liver disease, both malignant and benign in nature. The traditional treatment for CCA was resection, when possible, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Liver transplant oncology is increasingly recognized as a potentially curative approach for patients with intrahepatic (iCCA) and perihilar (pCCA) cholangiocarcinoma. The link between IRI and disease recurrence is increasingly recognized in transplant oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma. However, smaller numbers have prevented similar analyses for CCA. The mechanistic link may be even more critical in this disease, as IRI causes the most profound damage to the intrahepatic bile ducts. This article reviews the underlying mechanisms associated with biliary inflammation and biliary pathology after liver transplantation. One main focus is on the link between transplant-related IRI-associated inflammation and the recurrence of cholangiocarcinoma and benign liver diseases of the biliary tree. Risk factors and protective strategies are highlighted.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The emergence of combination therapy, atezolizumab (anti-PDL1, immune checkpoint inhibitor) and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) has revolutionised the management of HCC. Despite this breakthrough, the best overall response rate with first-line systemic therapy is only about 30%, owing to intra-tumoural heterogeneity, complex tumour microenvironment and the lack of predictive biomarkers. Many groups have attempted to classify HCC based on the immune microenvironment and have consistently observed better outcomes in immunologically "hot" HCC. We summarised possible mechanisms of tumour immune evasion based on the latest literature and the rationale for combination/sequential therapy to improve treatment response. Lastly, we proposed future strategies and therapies to overcome HCC immune evasion to further improve treatment outcomes of HCC.

Liver transplant oncology (TO) represents an area of increasing clinical and scientific interest including a heterogeneous group of clinical-pathological settings. Immunosuppressive management after LT is a key factor relevantly impacting result. However, disease-related guidance is still lacking, and many open questions remain in the field. Based on such a substantial lack of solid evidences, the Italian Board of Experts in Liver Transplantation (I-BELT) (a working group including representatives of all national transplant centers), unprecedently promoted a methodologically sound consensus conference on the topic, based on the GRADE approach. The group final recommendations are herein presented and commented. The 18 PICOs and Statements and their levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are reported and grouped into seven areas: (1) risk stratification by histopathological and bio-molecular parameters and role of mTORi post-LT; (2) steroids and HCC recurrence; (3) management of immunosuppression when HCC recurs after LT; (4) mTORi monotherapy; (5) machine perfusion and HCC recurrence after LT; (6) physiopathology of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and immunosuppression, the role of inflammation; (7) immunotherapy in liver transplanted patients. The interest in mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi), for steroid avoidance and the need for a reduction to CNI exposure emerged from the consensus process. A selected list of unmet needs prompting further investigations have also been developed. The so far heterogeneous and granular approach to immunosuppression in oncologic patients deserves greater efforts for a more standardized therapeutic response to the different clinical scenarios. This consensus process makes a first unprecedented step in this direction, to be developed on a larger scale.

To obtain long-term data on the use of everolimus in patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma, we conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis of adult recipients transplanted between 2013 and 2021. Patients on everolimus-incorporating immunosuppression were matched with those on tacrolimus using an inverse probability of treatment weighting methodology. Two propensity-matched groups of patients were thus compared: 233 (45.6%) receiving everolimus versus 278 (54.4%) on tacrolimus. At a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 4.4 (3.8) years after transplantation, everolimus patients showed a reduced risk of recurrence versus tacrolimus (7.7% versus 16.9%; RR = 0.45; p = 0.002). At multivariable analysis, microvascular infiltration (HR = 1.22; p < 0.04) and a higher tumor grading (HR = 1.27; p < 0.04) were associated with higher recurrence rate while being within Milan criteria at transplant (HR = 0.56; p < 0.001), a successful pre-transplant downstaging (HR = 0.63; p = 0.01) and use of everolimus (HR = 0.46; p < 0.001) had a positive impact on the risk of post-transplant recurrence. EVR patients with earlier drug introduction (≤30 days; p < 0.001), longer treatment duration (p < 0.001), and higher drug exposure (≥5.9 ng/mL; p < 0.001) showed lower recurrence rates versus TAC. Based on our experience, everolimus provides a reduction in the relative risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, especially for advanced-stage patients and those with earlier drug administration, higher drug exposure, and longer time on treatment. These data advocate for early everolimus introduction after liver transplantation to reduce the attrition rate consequent to chronic immunosuppression.

Liver transplantation has become standard practice for treating end-stage liver disease. The success of the procedure relies on effective immunosuppressive medications to control the host's immune response. Despite the liver's inherent capacity to foster tolerance, the early post-transplant period is marked by significant immune reactivity. To ensure favorable outcomes, it is imperative to identify and manage various rejection types, encompassing T-cell-mediated, antibody-mediated, and chronic rejection. However, the approach to prescribing immunosuppressants relies heavily on clinical judgment rather than evidence-based criteria. Given that the majority of patients will require lifelong immuno suppression as the mechanisms underlying operational tolerance are still being investigated, healthcare providers must possess an understanding of immune responses, rejection mechanisms, and the pathways targeted by immunosuppressive drugs. This knowledge enables customization of treatments and improved patient care, even though a consensus on an optimal immunosuppressive regimen remains elusive.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer, which was the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide in 2020. Transplantation remains the preferred treatment for cure in otherwise unresectable HCC. There are several areas of active research that have led to expansion of eligibility criteria for transplantation including local-regional therapy for downstaging patients presenting outside of the Milan criteria and identification of tumor biomarkers aiding in the early diagnosis, determining prognosis and likelihood of recurrence after transplantation for HCC. New neoadjuvant therapies and post-transplant immunosuppression regimens may also result in expansion of transplant eligibility criteria for HCC.

Liver transplantation (LT) has emerged as a standard of care for patients with end-stage liver disease, providing a life-saving intervention for patients with severely compromised liver function in both the acute and chronic setting. While LT has also become a routine procedure for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), offering a potential cure by treating both the tumor and the underlying liver disease, its relevance in the context of other malignancies such as cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA), combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) or liver metastases is still the subject of intense debate and no definite recommendations have yet been established. This review summarizes the current therapeutic standards in the context of LT for gastrointestinal malignancies and provides a reflection and outlook on current scientific and clinical developments.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a growing indication for liver transplantation (LT). Careful candidate selection is a prerequisite to keep post-LT recurrence rates within acceptable percentages. In the pre-LT period, various types of locoregional treatments and/or systemic therapies can be used for bridging or downstaging purposes. In this context, one of the factors limiting the possibility of treatment is the degree of functional liver impairment. In the LT subject, no widely accepted indications are available to guide treatment of disease recurrence and heterogeneity exists between transplant centers. Improved liver function post LT makes multiple therapeutic strategies theoretically feasible, but patient management is complicated by the need to adjust immunosuppressive therapy and to assess potential toxicities and drug-drug interactions. Finally, there is controversy and uncertainty about the use of recently introduced immunotherapeutic drugs, mainly due to the risk of organ rejection. In this paper, we will review the most recent available literature on the management of post-transplant HCC recurrence, discussing evidence and controversies.

The clinical effects of tacrolimus (TAC) exposure on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) remain unclear. In this retrospective single centric study, 512 patients who underwent LT for HCC were divided into four groups according to cumulative exposure to tacrolimus (CET) during 3 months after LT: conventional (n = 218), aggressive minimization (n = 32), minimization (n = 161), and high exposure (n = 101). Impact of CET on HCC recurrence and death were analyzed. Compared with the conventional group, the other three CET groups showed a similar risk of HCC recurrence. The aggressive minimization group showed a higher risk [hazard ratio (HR) 5.64, P < 0.001] and the high exposure group showed a marginal risk (HR 1.67, P = 0.081) of overall death compared to the conventional group. CET during 3 months was not associated with HCC recurrence in the matched cohort and various subgroups. TAC minimization is not effective to prevent HCC recurrence but could result in higher mortality in LT recipients.

Liver transplantation is one of the most effective treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The balance between inhibiting immune rejection and preventing tumor recurrence after liver transplantation is the key to determining the long-term prognosis of patients with HCC after liver transplantation. In our previous study, we found that capecitabine (CAP), an effective drug for the treatment of HCC, could exert an immunosuppressive effect after liver transplantation by inducing T cell ferroptosis. Recent studies have shown that ferroptosis is highly associated with autophagy. In this study, we confirmed that the autophagy inducer rapamycin (RAPA) combined with metronomic capecitabine (mCAP) inhibits glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and promotes ferroptosis in CD4+ T cells to exert immunosuppressive effects after rat liver transplantation. Compared with RAPA or mCAP alone, the combination of RAPA and mCAP could adequately reduce liver injury in rats with acute rejection after transplantation. The CD4+ T cell counts in peripheral blood, spleen, and transplanted liver of recipient rats significantly decreased, and the oxidative stress level and ferrous ion concentration of CD4+ T cells significantly increased in the combination group. In vitro, the combination of drugs significantly promoted autophagy, decreased GPX4 protein expression, and induced ferroptosis in CD4+ T cells. In conclusion, the autophagy inducer RAPA improved the mCAP-induced ferroptosis in CD4+ T cells. Our results support the concept of ferroptosis as an autophagy-dependent cell death and suggest that the combination of ferroptosis inducers and autophagy inducers is a new research direction for improving immunosuppressive regimens after liver transplantation.

To effectively prevent recurrence, improve the prognosis and increase the survival rate of primary liver cancer (PLC) patients with radical cure, the Chinese Society of Hepatology, Chinese Medical Association, invited clinical experts and methodologists to develop the Consensus on the Tertiary Prevention of Primary Liver Cancer, which was based on the clinical and scientific advances on the risk factors, histopathology, imaging finding, clinical manifestation, and prevention of recurrence of PLC. The purpose is to provide a current basis for the prevention, surveillance, early detection and diagnosis, and the effective measures of PLC recurrence.

Liver transplantation has made significant progress in recent decades. Lung cancer is one of the most frequently occurring cancers after liver transplantation. However, the risk of lung cancer among liver transplant patients compared with the general population is unclear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the risk of developing lung cancer after liver transplantation.

All eligible studies published in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase from database inception to April 2022 were included. Standardized incidence ratio was used to describe the increased risk of lung cancer in liver transplant recipients as compared with the general population. The random-effects model was used for the calculations. A funnel plot and Egger test were performed to assess the potential publication bias.

Our meta-analysis included 15 studies, which involved 76,897 liver transplantation patients. Studies included in this review showed significant heterogeneity (I2  = 65.3%; p < 0.001), which required a random-effects model for effect pooling. The results indicated a significant higher risk of developing lung cancer in liver transplant patients than the general population with a pooled SIR of 2.06 (95% CI: 1.73, 2.46, p < 0.001). When stratified by region, no significant regional difference was observed. It showed a similarly doubled risk of lung cancer in Europe and North America, but an insignificantly increased risk in Asian populations. The sensitivity analysis by removal and substitution of each literature did not change the results.

Our meta-analysis suggests that liver transplant patients are twice as likely as the general population to develop lung cancer. Further research on risk factors for the development of lung cancer after liver transplantation should be conducted and appropriate surveillance protocols should be developed to reduce the risk of its occurrence.

In this study, we aim to develop and validate a radiomics model for pretreatment prediction of RPS6K expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients, thus helping clinical decision-making of mTOR-inhibitor (mTORi) therapy. We retrospectively enrolled 147 HCC patients, who underwent curative hepatic resection at First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine. RPS6K expression was determined with immunohistochemistry staining. Patients were randomly split into training or validation cohorts on a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted images. Machine learning algorithms including multiple logistic regression (MLR), supporting vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and artificial neural network (ANN) were applied to construct the predictive model. A nomogram was further built to visualize the possibility of RPS6K expression. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of diagnostic models. 174 radiomics features were confirmed correlated with RPS6K expression. Amongst all built models, the ANN-based hybrid model exhibited best predictive ability with AUC of 0.887 and 0.826 in training and validation cohorts. ALB was identified as the key clinical index, and the nomogram displayed further improved ability with AUC of 0.917 and 0.845. In this study, we proved MRI-based radiomics model and nomogram can accurately predict RPS6K expression non-invasively, thus providing help for clinical decision making for mTORi therapy.

Prior studies are inconsistent regarding the impact of antibody induction therapy on outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Adults transplanted with HCC exception priority were identified from February 27, 2002, to March 31, 2019, using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Time-to-event analyses evaluated the association of antibody induction therapy (none, nondepleting induction [NDI], depleting induction [DI]) with overall post-LT patient survival and HCC recurrence. Separate multivariable models adjusted for tumor characteristics on either last exception or on explant. The interaction of induction and maintenance regimen at LT discharge was investigated.

Among 22 535 LTs for HCC, 17 688 (78.48%) received no antibody induction, 2984 (13.24%) NDI, and 1863 (8.27%) DI. Minimal differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noted between induction groups, and there was significant center variability in practices. NDI was associated with improved survival, particularly when combined with a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and antimetabolite (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 versus no induction plus 3-drug therapy in the last exception model [ P  < 0.001]; HR 0.64 in the explant model [ P  = 0.011]). The combination of DI with CNI alone was also protective (HR 0.43; P  = 0.003). Neither NDI nor DI was associated with tumor recurrence (all P  > 0.1). However, increased HCC recurrence was observed with no induction plus CNI monotherapy (HR 1.47, P  = 0.019; versus no induction plus 3-drug therapy).

In conclusion, induction immunosuppression was not associated with worse post-LT outcomes in patients transplanted with HCC exception priority. An improvement in survival was possibly observed with NDI.

Liver transplantation is a treatment option for nonresectable patients with early-stage HCC, with more significant advantages when Milan criteria are fulfilled. An immunosuppressive regimen is required to reduce the risk of graft rejection after transplantation, and CNIs represent the drugs of choice in this setting. However, their inhibitory effect on T-cell activity accounts for a higher risk of tumour regrowth. mTOR inhibitors (mTORi) have been introduced as an alternative immunosuppressive approach to conventional CNI-based regimens to address both immunosuppression and cancer control. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling pathway regulates protein translation, cell growth, and metabolism, and the pathway is frequently deregulated in human tumours. Several studies have suggested the role of mTORi in reducing HCC progression after LT, accounting for a lower recurrence rate. Furthermore, mTOR immunosuppression controls the renal damage associated with CNI exposure. Conversion to mTOR inhibitors is associated with stabilizing and recovering renal dysfunction, suggesting an essential renoprotective effect. Limitations in this therapeutic approach are related to their negative impact on lipid and glucose metabolism as well as on proteinuria development and wound healing. This review aims to summarize the roles of mTORi in managing patients with HCC undergoing LT. Strategies to overcome common adverse effects are also proposed.

Neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastatic lesions are often multiple and found to be unresectable. Rationale of multivisceral transplantation (MVT: liver-pancreas-intestine transplantation) include radical and complete resection of primary, visible and invisible metastatic tumors by removing all abdominal organs and the lymphatic system. This review aims to describe the concept of MVT for NET and neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NELM), patient selection, timing of MVT, and posttransplant outcomes and management.

Although indication criteria of MVT for NET vary between transplant centers, the Milan-NET criteria for liver transplant are often applied to MVT candidates. Extra-abdominal tumors such as lung and/or bone lesions should be ruled out prior to MVT. Histology should be confirmed as low-grade (G1/G2). Ki-67 should be also checked to confirm biologic features. Timing of MVT remains controversial, whereas many experts recommend 6 months of disease stability prior to MVT.

Although MVT would not be a standard therapy because of limited access to MVT centers, benefit of MVT should be recognized, which includes its potential ability to better achieve curative resection of disseminated tumors in the abdominal cavity. Early referral of difficult cases to MVT centers should be considered before palliative best supportive cares.

Sonographic features are not well-defined in thoracoabdominal wall metastases (TAWM) of liver cancer after liver transplantation (LT), which is one of the most important reasons affecting the long-term survival of transplant recipients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the sonographic features of TAWM from liver cancer after LT and to identify the role of ultrasound (US) in the differential diagnosis between TAWM and benign lesions of the thoracoabdominal wall after LT.

This retrospective study included 1,999 LT recipients between January 2008 and July 2021. Clinical characteristics and sonographic features of 32 patients with thoracoabdominal wall lesions were analyzed. The types of thoracoabdominal wall lesions were studied, and the US findings of benign and malignant lesions were compared. Whether TAWM from liver cancer after LT exhibited any distinctive sonographic appearance was evaluated.

All seven malignant cases were metastases from liver cancer. The benign group included 13 cases of thoracoabdominal wallencapsulated effusion/hematoma, nine of abdominal incisional hernia, and three of thoracoabdominal wall inflammatory mass. Sonographic features were significantly different between two groups. Compared with the benign group, metastases lesions were frequently located in the parietal peritoneum/pleura (4/7 vs 1/25, p = 0.009), fewer lesions were located at abdominal incisions (3/7 vs 23/25, p = 0.012), all metastatic lesions were hypoechoic (7/7 vs 5/25, p = 0.001), and most lesions had blood flow signals (4/7 vs 3/25, p = 0.026). Additionally, most metastatic cases had intrahepatic lesions (4/7 vs 1/25, p = 0.004) and multiple extrahepatic solid lesions in the abdomen (6/7 vs 0/25, p = 0.000).

Compared with benign lesions, TAWM of liver cancer after LT exhibited unique sonographic features.

Outcomes after liver transplantation have continuously improved over the past decades, but long-term survival rates are still lower than in the general population. The liver has distinct immunological functions linked to its unique anatomical configuration and to its harbouring of a large number of cells with fundamental immunological roles. The transplanted liver can modulate the immunological system of the recipient to promote tolerance, thus offering the potential for less aggressive immunosuppression. The selection and adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs should be individualised to optimally control alloreactivity while mitigating toxicities. Routine laboratory tests are not accurate enough to make a confident diagnosis of allograft rejection. Although several promising biomarkers are being investigated, none of them is sufficiently validated for routine use; hence, liver biopsy remains necessary to guide clinical decisions. Recently, there has been an exponential increase in the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors due to the unquestionable oncological benefits they provide for many patients with advanced-stage tumours. It is expected that their use will also increase in liver transplant recipients and that this might affect the incidence of allograft rejection. Currently, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients is limited and cases of severe allograft rejection have been reported. In this review, we discuss the clinical relevance of alloimmune disease, the role of minimisation/withdrawal of immunosuppression, and provide practical guidance for using checkpoint inhibitors in liver transplant recipients.

The combination of everolimus (EVR) and low-dose tacrolimus (lowTAC) prevents T cell-mediated rejection of liver grafts as sufficiently as high-dose tacrolimus (highTAC) and mycophenolate, but is associated with a preserved kidney function within the first years after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, none of the available studies assessed the histological pattern of graft injury or fibrosis in surveillance biopsies (svLbx).

All svLbx taken under at least one month of stable immunosuppression with either EVR (aim 3-8 ng/ml) combined with lowTAC (aim 3-5 ng/ml) or highTAC (aim 5-8 ng/ml) combined with mycophenolate (500-1500 mg/day) within the first three to four years after OLT at our center were included. Patients who were switched to EVR because of insufficient control of alloreactivity were excluded.

Reasons for switches to EVR were mainly malignancies before or after OLT, or chronic kidney injury. We were able to include 20 svLbx with EVR/lowTAC and 49 with highTAC/mycophenolate. Both groups had similar liver enzymes and similar kidney function. The EVR/lowTAC group exhibited lower TAC trough levels at svLbx (4.4 vs. 6.6 ng/ml; p<.001) in comparison to highTAC/mycophenolate. Histological graft injury quantified by the rejection activity index and hepatitis activity index (Ishak), as well as fibrosis were not significantly different between the EVR/lowTAC and highTAC/mycophenolate groups. Likewise, subclinical TCMR, histological criteria justifying immunosuppression minimization, and steatosis had equal prevalence in both regimens. Immunosuppression was adjusted according to the svLbx findings. Immunosuppression regimens had similarly low rates of rejection after immunosuppression reduction, when relevant graft injury was absent in the biopsy.

In conclusion, EVR/lowTAC seems to control alloreactivity and histological graft injury as sufficiently as highTAC/mycophenolate within the first 3-4 years after OLT.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive malignancy arising from the biliary epithelium. It may occur at any location along the biliary tree with the perihilar area being the most common. Prognosis is poor with 5-year overall survival at less than 10%, typically due to unresectable disease at presentation. Radical surgical resection with clear margins offers a chance of cure in patients with resectable tumours, but is frequently not possible due to locally advanced disease. On the other hand, orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) allows for a radical and potentially curative resection for these patients, but has been historically controversial due to the limited supply of donor grafts and previously poor outcomes. In patients with perihilar CCA, within specific criteria and following the implementation of a protocol combining neoadjuvant chemoradiation and LT, excellent results have been achieved in the last decades, resulting in its increasing acceptance as an indication for LT and the standard of care in several centres with significant experience. However, in intrahepatic CCA, the role of LT remains controversial and owing to dismal previous results it is not an accepted indication. Nevertheless, more recent studies have demonstrated favourable results with LT in early intrahepatic CCA, indicating that, under defined criteria, its role may increase in the future. This review highlights the history and contemporary advances of LT in CCA, with particular focus on the improving outcomes of LT in intrahepatic and perihilar CCA and future perspectives.

Posttransplant malignancies, particularly recurrent and de novo, in solid organs including kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a significant complication associated with substantial mortality, largely attributed to long-term immunosuppression necessary to maintain allograft tolerance. Older age at transplantation and oncogenic virus infection along with pretransplant malignancies are among the main factors contributing to the risk of cancer in this population. As the mean age of transplant candidates rises, the rate of transplant recipients with pretransplant malignancies also increases. The eligibility criteria for transplantation in patients with prior cancer have recently changed. The overall risk of posttransplant malignancies is at least double after transplantation including KTRs relative to the general population, most pronounced for skin cancers associated with UV radiation and virally-mediated tumors. The risk of renal cell carcinoma is specifically increased in the kidney transplant population. The therapy of cancer in transplant patients is associated with risk of higher toxicity, and graft rejection and/or impairment, which poses a unique challenge in the management. Reduction of immunosuppression and the use of mTOR inhibitors are common after cancer diagnosis, although optimal immunosuppression for transplant recipients with cancer remains undefined. Suboptimal cancer treatment contributing to a worse prognosis has been reported for malignancies in this population. In this article, we focus on the prevalence and outcomes of posttransplant malignancies, cancer therapy including a short overview of immunotherapy, cancer screening and prevention strategies, and immunosuppression as a cancer risk factor. The 2020/2021 recommendations of the Kidney Diseases Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Society of Transplantation (AST) for transplant candidates with a history of cancer are presented.

Liver transplantation (LT) for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), or biliary tract cancer (BTC), remains controversial regarding high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. Oncological follow-up may benefit from tumor-inhibiting properties of mTOR inhibitors (mTORI), shown with improved survival for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients after LT. The aim of this study was to investigate the recurrence and survival in relation to tumor type and type of immunosuppression (IS). LT patients with CCA or mixed HCC/CCA (mHCC/CCA) (n = 67) were retrospectively analyzed. Endpoints were the time from LT to recurrence (n = 44) and survival after recurrence. Statistically significant impairment in survival for recurrent CCA (rCCA) was shown in patients not eligible for surgical resection (HR 2.46 (CI: 1.2−5.1; p = 0.02). Histological proven grading >1 and N1 status at initial transplantation were associated with impaired survival (HR 0.13 (CI: 0.03−0.58); p < 0.01 and HR 3.4 (CI: 1.0−11.65); p = 0.05). Reduced IS after tumor recurrence improved survival (HR 4.2/CI: 1.3−13.6; p = 0.02). MTORI initiation before recurrence or after had no significant impact on survival. Our data thereby indicate, similar to findings in recurrent HCC after LT, that patients with rCCA after LT benefit from a reduction in IS upon recurrence.

This work aimed to explore in depth the genomic and molecular underpinnings of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with increased 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake in PET and to identify therapeutic targets based on this imaging-genomic surrogate.

We used RNA sequencing and whole-exome sequencing data obtained from 117 patients with HCC who underwent hepatic resection with preoperative FDG-PET/CT imaging as a discovery cohort. The primary radiogenomic results were validated with transcriptomes from a second cohort of 81 patients with more advanced tumors. All patients were allocated to an FDG-avid or FDG-non-avid group according to the PET findings. We also screened potential drug candidates targeting FDG-avid HCCs in vitro and in vivo.

High FDG avidity conferred worse recurrence-free survival after HCC resection. Whole transcriptome analysis revealed upregulation of mTOR pathway signals in the FDG-avid tumors, together with higher abundance of associated mutations. These clinical and genomic findings were replicated in the validation set. A molecular signature of FDG-avid HCCs identified in the discovery set consistently predicted poor prognoses in the public-access datasets of two cohorts. Treatment with an mTOR inhibitor resulted in decreased FDG uptake followed by effective tumor control in both the hyperglycolytic HCC cell lines and xenograft mouse models.

Our PET-based radiogenomic analysis indicates that mTOR pathway genes are markedly activated and altered in HCCs with high FDG retention. This nuclear imaging biomarker may stimulate umbrella trials and tailored treatments in precision care of patients with HCC.

Graft survival beyond year 1 has not changed after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) over the last decades. Likewise, OLT causes comorbidities such as infection, renal impairment and cancer. We evaluated our single-center real-world individualized immunosuppression program after OLT, based on 211 baseline surveillance biopsies (svLbx) without any procedural complications. Patients were classified as low, intermediate and high rejection risk based on graft injury in svLbx and anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies. While 32% of patients had minimal histological inflammation, 57% showed histological inflammation and 23% advanced fibrosis (>F2), which was not predicted by lab parameters. IS was modified in 79% of patients after svLbx. After immunosuppression reduction in 69 patients, only 5 patients showed ALT elevations and three of these patients had a biopsy-proven acute rejection, two of them related to lethal comorbidities. The rate of liver enzyme elevation including rejection was not significantly increased compared to a svLbx control cohort prior to the initiation of our structured program. Immunosuppression reduction led to significantly better kidney function compared to this control cohort. In conclusion, a biopsy guided personalized immunosuppression protocol after OLT can identify patients requiring lower immunosuppression or patients with graft injury in which IS should not be further reduced.