This study used network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of available advanced therapies for moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) versus the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab.

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced therapies in moderately to severely active CD. Bayesian NMAs were conducted for outcomes of clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and a combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response, at the end of the maintenance phase (up to 1 year). Primary analyses included patients with varied prior inadequate treatment responses, with additional analyses conducted for specific subgroups. Re-randomized trials were normalized in several cases to mimic a standard treat-through design, incorporating data from additional sources, when necessary, for patients who had an inadequate response or experienced a delayed response following induction.

Of the 58 RCTs identified, 13 with maintenance endpoint data were ultimately included in the NMAs. Guselkumab 100 mg and 200 mg were more likely to be effective versus several comparators. Guselkumab 200 mg demonstrated significantly greater efficacy versus infliximab 10 mg/kg every 8 weeks and upadacitinib 30 mg daily for clinical response and clinical remission. For endoscopic response, guselkumab 200 mg showed significantly greater efficacy than ustekinumab, adalimumab, and upadacitinib. Significance was also noted versus ustekinumab on the combined outcome of clinical remission with endoscopic response. Similarly, guselkumab 100 mg demonstrated efficacy versus comparators across analyses. Guselkumab achieved higher rankings based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Findings of primary analyses within mixed populations were generally corroborated by subpopulation analyses.

Results of this NMA in moderately to severely active CD indicate a higher likelihood of guselkumab achieving each clinical and endoscopic endpoint analyzed at the end of the maintenance phase versus other advanced therapies assessed.

This systematic review aims to elucidate the use of corticosteroids in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating biologics and small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We analyzed corticosteroid use during both the induction and maintenance phases, highlighting areas needing standardization and improvement in clinical research.

We selected placebo-controlled phase 3 RCTs involving adults with moderate to severe IBD. These studies included detailed reports on corticosteroid use during induction and maintenance phases, with clinical remission and/or corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CSF-CR) as primary endpoints.

Initially, 324 studies were identified and refined to 26 RCTs after screening. Analysis revealed variability in corticosteroid administration. Over time, corticosteroid use showed a decreasing trend (Spearman ρ = -0.42, P = .045). Studies allowing higher corticosteroid doses (up to 40 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent) reported a higher proportion of corticosteroid users (51.8%, range: 42.9%-61%) compared to those excluding patients on doses >20 mg/day (37.5%, range: 31.6%-51.8%; P = .007) or >30 mg/day (41.1%, range: 29.6%-53.7%; P = .023). Trials with mandatory tapering protocols showed a narrower gap between overall clinical remission and CSF-CR rates, with an average difference of 6% in the group without mandatory tapering and 1.2% in the group with forced tapering (T-test P = .038; Cohen's d ≈ 1.1).

This review highlights the variability in corticosteroid use across RCTs and its impact on evaluating new IBD therapies. Standardizing tapering protocols and defining CSF-CR are essential for accurate outcomes.

Real-world studies on vedolizumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are often limited by small sample size and short follow-up. In this study, we investigated the 2-year effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in patients with IBD, and applied eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) to identify predictors of both.

The Long-term Italian Vedolizumab Effectiveness (LIVE) study is multicentric, ambispective, observational study enrolling 1111 IBD patients (563 Crohn's disease, CD, 542 ulcerative colitis, UC). Steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) at 24 months was the primary endpoint. A XAI model (eXtreme Gradient Boosting, XGB) was applied to identify the main clinical predictors of SFCR and development of adverse events (AEs).

Rates of SFCR at 24 months were 31.6 % and 39.7 % in CD and UC patients, and 0.14 AEs per patient-year was recorded. On XGB analysis, previous exposure to anti-TNFα and older age were the most important drivers for the prediction of SFCR; lower baseline CRP levels and fewer comorbidities were the most important features associated with no development of AEs.

Vedolizumab is effective and safe in IBD patients. XAI yielded promising results in identifying the most important predictors of SFCR and development of AEs.

In Crohn's disease (CD), symptomatic and endoscopic assessments often show poor correlation. Bile acid malabsorption is a common comorbidity in these patients and often results in bile acid diarrhea (BAD). This post-hoc clinical trial analysis evaluated BAD presence and its association with symptoms and disease activity in patients with active CD.

The bile acid precursor, serum 7a-hydroxy-4cholestern-3-one (C4), was analyzed before and after adalimumab therapy in patients with moderate to severe CD. Patients were stratified by C4 concentration to evaluate the association of BAD with symptomatic and endoscopic disease activity.

Elevated baseline serum C4 (C4 ≥ 48.3 ng/mL) was present in 37.1% of patients with active CD, was most frequently associated with isolated ileal disease, and persistent in many patients after treatment. Compared to C4 concentrations maintained within the normal range, persistently elevated C4 ≥ 48.3 ng/mL was associated with reduced stool frequency/abdominal pain score (SF/APS) clinical remission (23.9% vs 55.9%, P < .001), and SF remission (28.3% vs 67.7%, P < .001), but not endoscopic remission (43.5% vs 53.1%). In patients with endoscopic remission, those with C4 ≥ 48.3 ng/mL demonstrated reduced SF/APS clinical remission (28.0% vs 51.0%) and SF remission (36.0% vs 67.7%), but similar AP remission (72.0% vs 70.8%) compared to those with normal C4 concentration.

In active CD, BAD was prevalent, particularly in isolated ileal disease, and associated with persistent diarrhea, but not endoscopic remission after treatment. These findings shed light on the discordance between symptomatic and endoscopic assessments observed in CD clinical trials and the challenges in treating isolated ileal disease. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02065570.

Vedolizumab is approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Real-world evidence is essential for understanding the effectiveness and benefit-risk profile of vedolizumab outside clinical trial settings.

To identify, systematically review and assess the real-world effectiveness and treatment persistence of vedolizumab in patients with CD, particularly over long-term follow-up periods and among populations with differing treatment experience, and to compare with the treatment persistence of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α treatment.

Literature searches were conducted to identify studies published from 2014 to 2022. Relevant congress searches were conducted (2015-2022) using Embase or by hand. Data on adults with CD treated with vedolizumab or anti-TNFα treatment in a real-world setting were extracted for meta-analysis.

Data from 73 studies, including 29,894 patients with CD, reported ≥ 1 outcome of interest for this analysis. Vedolizumab treatment persistence rate was 65.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 60.2-70.1) at 1 year and 54.8% (95% CI 43.9-65.3) at 2 years. The treatment persistence rate with vedolizumab versus anti-TNFα treatment was 84.6% (95% CI 70.2-92.8) versus 75.3% (95% CI 69.7-80.2) at 1 year and 70.6% (95% CI 60.7-78.8) versus 64.6% (95% CI 56.7-71.8) at 2 years. The mucosal healing rate at 1 year was 40.6% (95% CI 34.2-47.3). Clinical remission rates were 39.4% (95% CI 33.9-45.1) at 1 year and 34.3% (95% CI 18.1-55.2) at 2 years. Corticosteroid-free clinical remission rates were 33.2% (95% CI 28.5-38.3) at 1 year and 20.4% (95% CI 12.5-31.5) at 2 years. All clinical outcome rates were higher in biologic-naive than in biologic-experienced patients.

Real-world use of vedolizumab was associated with favourable long-term effectiveness and treatment persistence. Vedolizumab is a suitable first-line biological option for biologic-naive patients with CD.

Mucosal healing is the mainstream goal of modern treat-to-target strategy as it is associated with a significantly more favorable disease course in IBD patients with either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. Recent advances in endoscopic imaging technologies have overcome the traditional concept of mucosal healing assessed with conventional white light imaging, allowing for multiple levels of endoscopic healing up to the boundaries of molecular and functional evaluation. In this review, we focused on conventional and emerging strategies to assess endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis and ileocolonic Crohn's disease, examining their pros and cons in real life practice.

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective monoclonal anti-α4β7 integrin antibody treatment for Crohn's disease (CD). A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (NCT03234907) assessed vedolizumab efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with moderate-to-severe CD and inadequate/loss of response/intolerance to previous conventional or anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapy.

Eligible patients aged ≥18 to ≤80 years with moderate-to-severe CD (CD Activity Index [CDAI] total score 220-400) were randomized 2:1 to vedolizumab 300 mg intravenous infusion or placebo at Weeks 0, 2, 6 of induction, and every 4/8 weeks during Week 14-58 maintenance treatment. Primary and secondary endpoints at Week 10 were enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline CDAI score), and clinical remission (CDAI score ≤150), respectively. Additional Week 10 and/or Week 60 assessments included endoscopic and biomarker (C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin) measurements.

The study was conducted at 30 centers (August 2017 through August 2020). Enrolled patients (n = 215) were randomized to vedolizumab (n = 144) or placebo (n = 71). By Week 10, 19.4 % vedolizumab-treated versus 24.3 % placebo-treated patients achieved an enhanced clinical response. The Cui-Hung-Wang-adjusted p-value for the primary endpoint was 0.347. After maintenance treatment at Week 60, rates of enhanced clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, mucosal healing, and biomarker improvements appeared greater for vedolizumab-treated than placebo-treated patients.

There were no new safety findings for vedolizumab treatment of Chinese patients with CD. Although the primary endpoint was not met, vedolizumab-treated patients showed improvements in other disease activity measures at Weeks 10 and 60.

Biomarkers offer potential alternatives to endoscopies in monitoring ulcerative colitis (UC) progression and therapeutic response. This post hoc analysis of the ELEVATE UC clinical program assessed potential predictive values of fecal calprotectin (fCAL) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as biomarkers and associated responses to etrasimod, an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active UC, in 2 phase 3 clinical trials.

In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, patients were randomized 2:1 to 2 mg of etrasimod once daily or placebo for 52 or 12 weeks, respectively. Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP differences between responders and nonresponders for efficacy end points (clinical remission, clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission [EIHR]) were assessed by Wilcoxon P-values. Sensitivity and specificity were presented as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves with area under the curve (AUC).

In ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, 289 and 238 patients received etrasimod and 144 and 116 received placebo, respectively. Baseline fCAL/hsCRP concentrations were generally balanced. Both trials had lower week-12 median fCAL levels in week-12 responders vs nonresponders receiving etrasimod for clinical remission, clinical response, and EIHR (all P < .001), with similar trends for hsCRP levels (all P < .01). For etrasimod, AUCs for fCAL/hsCRP and EIHR were 0.85/0.74 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 52), 0.83/0.69 (week 52; ELEVATE UC 52), and 0.80/0.65 (week 12; ELEVATE UC 12).

Fecal calprotectin/hsCRP levels decreased with etrasimod treatment; ROC analyses indicated a prognostic correlation between fCAL changes during induction and short-/long-term treatment response.

Advanced combination therapy with biologics and small molecules has seen more widespread implementation for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there is a paucity of data available to guide the successful de-escalation of combination therapy following the achievement of disease remission. Therefore, we pursued this retrospective study to evaluate our center's approach to de-escalation of these patients.

IBD patients undergoing de-escalation of combination biologic therapy from May 2017 to March 2023 with a follow-up visit were included. The need for re-escalation, steroid therapy, and hospitalization at follow-up was compared between the de-escalation method, adherence, patient demographics, disease characteristics, and measures of disease activity.

Fifty IBD patients underwent de-escalation, with a median age of 35.7 years. All 50 patients had a follow-up visit within a median of 168 (111) days. Patients were divided into two groups with 12 (24%) patients requiring re-escalation of therapy and 38 (76%) able to maintain or further de-escalate. Of those that required re-escalation, 3 (25%) required the use of systemic steroids and none required hospitalization for IBD. Non-adherence to the de-escalation plan significantly correlated with the need for re-escalation (P < .001).

Patient adherence and the number of prior failed biologic therapies were identified as potential risk factors for re-escalation. The type of agent being de-escalated (biologic or Janus kinase inhibitors [JAKi] did not correlate with the need for re-escalation).

Case 1 involved a 34-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with Crohn's disease (CD) at 30 years old. After deciding to discontinue CD treatment, she was diagnosed with moderate flare-up of CD based on disease activity and endoscopic findings. Inadequate response was seen 7 days after starting oral prednisolone (PSL) at 30 mg/day, so combination therapy was started with intensive granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) plus upadacitinib (UPA) at 45 mg/day. Twelve weeks after starting this combination therapy, clinical remission and endoscopic and histological improvements of the inflamed mucosa were achieved with no adverse events. Case 2 involved a 26-year-old man who had been diagnosed with CD at 13 years old. He was diagnosed with severe flare-up of CD based on disease activity and endoscopic findings due to loss of response to double doses of infliximab (IFX). Combination therapy was started with intensive GMA plus UPA at 45 mg/day. Twelve weeks after starting this therapy, clinical remission and endoscopic and histological improvements of the inflamed mucosa were achieved with no adverse events. The combination of intensive GMA plus UPA appears to have provided an effective therapeutic option for refractory CD in a patient with a 4-year history of CD and refractoriness to systemic corticosteroids, and in another patient with a 13-year history of CD and loss of response to IFX.

In the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 GRAPHITE study (NCT03657160), anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab showed greater efficacy than placebo for prevention of lower-gastrointestinal (GI) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) after unrelated allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab versus placebo for lower-GI aGVHD prevention in Japanese and non-Japanese patients, when added to standard GVHD prophylaxis (calcineurin inhibitor + methotrexate/mycophenolate mofetil + / - anti-thymocyte globulin [ATG]). The analysis included 35 (18 vedolizumab-treated, 17 placebo-treated) Japanese and 298 (150 vedolizumab-treated, 148 placebo-treated) non-Japanese patients. Lower-GI aGVHD-free survival by day + 180 after allo-HSCT (primary endpoint) was 94% in vedolizumab-treated versus 81% in placebo-treated Japanese patients (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.03-4.01; P = 0.2) and 84% in vedolizumab-treated versus 70% in placebo-treated non-Japanese patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.28-0.78; P = 0.002). The number of events for the 5 key secondary endpoints (lower-GI aGVHD-free and relapse-free survival, Grade C-D aGVHD-free survival, non-relapse mortality, overall survival, and Grade B-D aGVHD-free survival) by day + 180 was lower in vedolizumab- versus placebo-treated Japanese patients. No safety concerns were identified for vedolizumab use as lower-GI aGVHD prophylaxis in Japanese patients.

Background/Objectives: In the current era of tailored therapy, biologics such as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are increasingly administered to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The decision to discontinue biologics after side effects or a lack of response is usually simple, but the decision to stop treatment in patients in remission is more difficult: to date, no study has been conducted to investigate the effects of VDZ or UST withdrawal. Our study aims to investigate the rates and predictors of relapse of IBD after the discontinuation of VDZ and UST during a well-controlled disease phase and to evaluate the response to retreatment. Methods: In this observational, multicenter, retrospective study, we included IBD patients who discontinued VDZ or UST during a well-controlled disease phase after at least 1 year of treatment. We collected demographic and clinical data for each patient at the time of discontinuation and at follow-up visits. Results: We included 36 IBD patients from 5 different centers; 80.0%, 58.5%, and 48.3% of patients maintained clinical remission at 12, 24, and 48 months after discontinuation, respectively. Crohn's disease (CD) patients were more likely to maintain remission than ulcerative colitis (UC) patients at 48 months (70.0% vs. 40.0%). No predictors of relapse were identified, but UC patients had a higher risk of early relapse than CD patients (HR = 3.23); 81.3% of retreated IBD patients achieved clinical remission after induction and at 12 months. Conclusions: No predictors of disease relapse after treatment discontinuation were identified. Half of the patients had a relapse within 48 months after discontinuation, but most of them achieved clinical remission after retreatment.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) trials often stratify patients by prior biologic exposure, including prior biologic failure or intolerance. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes in IBD patients with prior biologic failure vs intolerance treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab.

A post-hoc analysis of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) clinical trials for ustekinumab (UNITI and UNIFI) and vedolizumab (GEMINI-1 and GEMINI-2) was performed. Clinical response, clinical remission, and endoscopic improvement (for UC) were compared among biologic naïve, biologic failure, and biologic intolerant patients. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and logistic regression, were performed.

A total of 1178 UC and 1439 CD patients received either ustekinumab or vedolizumab. In UC, biologic intolerant patients exhibited higher clinical response (54.7% vs 38.8%, aOR 1.87 [95% CI, 0.93-3.73]), clinical remission (25.0% vs 11.0%, aOR 2.84 [95% CI, 1.47-5.49]), and endoscopic improvement (40.6% vs 24.8%, aOR 2.76 [95% CI, 1.28-5.94]) compared to biologic failure, with outcomes similar to biologic naïve patients. In biologic intolerant CD patients, clinical response was similar between prior biologic failure and intolerance (34.2% vs 32.8%), but after adjustment for potential confounders, biologic intolerance was associated with higher odds of clinical response (aOR: 1.67, 95% CI, 1.09-2.55), with no significant difference observed for clinical remission (aOR: 1.48, 95% CI, 0.88-2.49).

Improved treatment outcomes were generally observed in patients with biologic intolerance compared to failure, especially in UC, where outcomes were similar to biologic naïve patients. Future clinical trials should meticulously differentiate prior biologic failure vs intolerance to mitigate potential bias.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic, inflammatory bowel disease with a wide range of presentations, including perianal disease. Presentation is variable, ranging from skin tags to complex fistulas, strictures, and nonhealing wounds. Symptoms of perianal CD can be devastating and may impact quality of life. Optimal management requires coordinated medical and surgical therapy. When possible, conservative treatment of perianal disease should be attempted. However, surgical treatment is often required, and some patients may ultimately require total proctocolectomy with permanent diversion due to the severity of disease. Even with close attention and treatment, disease can be recurrent, and complications of treatment are sometimes worse than the initial presentation. Novel treatments, including use of mesenchymal stem cells and autologous fat grafting, hold some promise, but are not yet widely available. Thorough knowledge of treatment options, careful patient selection, coordination between medical and surgical providers, and setting realistic expectations are important in the successful treatment of difficult perineal CD.

Crohn's disease (CD) is heterogeneous, and proximal involvement in the small bowel (SB) is associated with worse outcomes. Nonetheless, studies on the impact of duodenal and jejunal lesions in SB CD are limited. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of individuals diagnosed with SB CD, comparing those with and without proximal inflammation.

A cohort of 53 treatment-naive SB CD patients that underwent Capsule Endoscopy at diagnosis were retrospectively selected. The inflammatory activity was quantified using the Lewis Score for each SB tertile.

Thirty-seven (69.8%) patients displayed inflammatory activity in the first and/or second tertile together with third tertile involvement (Proximal+T3 group). Sixteen (30.2%) had inflammation in the third tertile only (T3 group). Individuals in the Proximal+T3 group had a higher risk for moderate-to-severe inflammation (OR 4.93, 95% CI: 1.3-18.3, p=0.013). A subgroup analysis for those with mild inflammatory activity showed that individuals in the Proximal+T3 group initiated biologic drugs more often (OR 11, 95% CI: 1.1-109.7, p=0.036).

Proximal SB lesions are associated with increased inflammatory activity, necessitating more frequent use of biologics in patients with mild disease. Early detection of proximal SB CD with Capsule Endoscopy may contribute to timely treatment.

Infliximab and adalimumab are the only biologics thus far approved for paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), so other biologics, such as vedolizumab, are prescribed off-label. Despite its frequent use, prospective data for vedolizumab treatment in children are available only for short-term induction outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with vedolizumab in paediatric patients with IBD.

In this multicentre, prospective, cohort study (VEDOKIDS), children younger than 18 years with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or IBD unclassified (analysed with the ulcerative colitis group) who had initiated intravenous vedolizumab were enrolled from 17 centres in six countries (Israel, the USA, Italy, Ireland, Denmark, and Slovenia). Patients initiating vedolizumab to prevent postoperative recurrence were excluded. Vedolizumab dose or schedule were not standardised, and concomitant treatment with any other medication was permitted. Patients were prospectively followed up for 54 weeks, with repeated biosampling. The primary outcome was complete remission at week 54, defined as clinical remission (weighted Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index [wPCDAI] of <12·5 points in Crohn's disease and Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index [PUCAI] of <10 in ulcerative colitis) without the need for surgery, exclusive enteral nutrition for children with Crohn's disease, or steroids (steroid-free and exclusive enteral nutrition-free clinical remission) plus CRP concentration lower than 1·5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) of 0·5 mg/dL. In cases of missing data on CRP, ESR was used instead (concentrations <1·5 times the ULN, which was 25 mm/h). Data were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02862132.

Between May 19, 2016, and April 1, 2022, we enrolled 142 patients. Five children who had received only one or two infusions of their three-infusion induction before switching drugs due to COVID-19 pandemic-related reasons were excluded, leaving 137 children (64 [47%] with Crohn's disease, 64 [47%] with ulcerative colitis, and nine [7%] with IBD unclassified; 63 [46%] male and 74 [54%] female; age range of 0·7-17·6 years) in the intention-to-treat population. The median wPCDAI score in children with Crohn's disease decreased from 35 (IQR 18 to 49) at baseline to 13 (0 to 25; median of differences -14 [95% CI -33 to 0]) at week 54, and the median PUCAI score in children with ulcerative colitis decreased from 25 (IQR 15 to 50) at baseline to 5 (0 to 25) at week 54 (median of difference -10 [-30 to 0]). Improvements in disease activity were significant by week 6, with no further significant changes between visits. At week 54, 16 (25%) of 64 children with Crohn's disease and 34 (47%) of 73 with ulcerative colitis or IBD unclassified were in complete remission. 38 vedolizumab-related adverse events were recorded in 29 (21%) of 137 children, the most common being headache (n=7), myalgia (n=4), and fever (n=4), and none were serious.

Vedolizumab maintenance seems safe and efficacious in children, with a higher efficacy in those with ulcerative colitis than in those with Crohn's disease.

The European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology Hepatology and Nutrition, and Takeda.

The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc).

An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 months, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin.

Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6±SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26±53.9) (p=0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at week 16 were higher in the sc group (22,364.3±5141.6) vs. iv (11,425.9±1514.2) (p=0.009). At week 16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the sc group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. Four patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site.

In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.

Crohn's disease, a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, necessitates a comprehensive treatment approach tailored to the individual's specific disease characteristics and overall health. Treatment strategies aim to induce and maintain remission, alleviate symptoms, normalize biomarkers, improve the endoscopic appearance of the intestine, and improve quality of life. Key therapeutic options include pharmacotherapy, featuring corticosteroids, immunomodulators, monoclonal antibodies, and more recently Janus Kinase inhibitors (JAKi) which target different mechanisms of inflammation. Additionally, surgical interventions may be required for complications or when medical therapy fails. The recent introduction of novel therapies, such as the interleukin-23 (IL-23) anti-p19 inhibitor risankizumab and the selective JAKi upadacitinib, raises pertinent questions regarding the optimal sequencing of advanced therapeutic options. This review evaluates current data to address these questions and reflects the author's perspectives based on a presentation at the 27th Annual University of Manitoba Key Topics in Gastroenterology 2024.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) refers to a group of chronic, recurrent intestinal inflammatory conditions with a complex cause and unclear underlying mechanisms. It includes two main types: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). The conventional treatment of IBD mainly includes 5-aminosalicylates, glucocorticoids, and immunosuppressive drugs, which have their limitations. Recent advancements in IBD research have expanded treatment options, with biological agents playing a key role. Anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha has emerged as the first-line therapy for moderate to severe IBD. Anti-integrin antibodies have also become important for the treatment, and vedolizumab is often used in cases of anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha failure and intolerance to other treatments. Other biological agents are being tested in clinical trials at different stages. This article reviews the efficacy and safety of the primary biological therapies for IBD and provides a comprehensive analysis of the current clinical challenges associated with the disease.

Therapy for children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is basically no different from that for adult patients. However, of the steadily increasing number of biologics and signalling inhibitors for adults, only two TNFα antibodies are currently approved in Germany for the treatment of IBD from the age of 6. This means that a large proportion of the drugs authorised for adults with IBD are not available for children and adolescents with moderate to severe disease. The small number of approved drugs also makes it difficult to achieve the prognostically important goal of achieving a sustained remission of IBD soon after diagnosis, which is characterised by the patient being free of symptoms and also the objectifiable goal of mucosa healing. This position paper is intended to present the current study situation on the drug treatment of children and adolescents with IBD outside the age limit and to serve as a basis for information and decision-making for the Medical Service in the assessment of individual case applications as well as for the treating physicians, the cost bearers, health policy and social court decision-makers.

Immunogenicity of biologic agents for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a critical issue, especially for tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, where anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) significantly impact drug clearance, efficacy, and safety. Studies have demonstrated that non-TNF biologics tend to have lower susceptibility to immunogenicity, potentially offering advantages, especially in long-term management. Understanding these differences is important for optimizing IBD treatment outcomes.

This review examines immunogenicity associated with different classes and individual biologic agents used in IBD; including TNF inhibitors and biologics targeting integrins and interleukins. We discuss key factors influencing ADAs formation, including drug structure, route of administration, and patient-specific factors. The literature reviewed includes recent clinical studies and long-term trials focusing on strategies to reduce immunogenicity such as therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and advanced combination.

While newer biologics demonstrate lower immunogenicity compared to anti-TNF agents, challenges remain in management to overcome existing ADAs responses while advances in genetic profiling, point-of-care TDM, and combination therapies offer promising pathways to reduce immunogenicity and enhance treatment durability. Continued research and innovation in biologic delivery methods, such as oral and subcutaneous formulations, will be critical in the next decade to further mitigate immunogenic risks and improve patient outcomes.

Advanced therapies (ADT) that encompass biological agents and small molecules have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), broadening the spectrum of available treatment options. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve satisfactory responses, necessitating surgical intervention. Treatment objectives have evolved beyond clinical remission, reduction of inflammation, and mucosal healing, shifting focus toward enhancing the quality of life, acknowledging the profound impact of IBD on physical and mental well-being.

This comprehensive review describes the current landscape of ADT for IBD, including dual biologic therapy (DBT), which involves the combination of two biologics or a single biologic with a small-molecule compound, as well as considerations surrounding the discontinuation of biologics.

ADT is the standard treatment for moderate to severe IBD, while DBT appears promising for specific subsets of patients, including those with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. However, these approaches may increase the risk of adverse effects, including malignancy. To optimize individualized treatment strategies in patients with refractory IBD, further trials are needed to refine ADT's predictive value, establish DBT's safety and indications, define biologic discontinuation criteria, and evaluate emerging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and bowel ultrasound in patient management.

Endoscopic healing (EH) is a key therapeutic target in Crohn's disease (CD). Proximal small bowel (SB) lesions in patients with CD are associated with a significant risk of strictures and bowel resection. Assessing SB in patients with CD is necessary because of its significant therapeutic implications. The advent of biologic therapies, including infliximab, ustekinumab, and vedolizumab, has significantly altered CD treatment. However, data on the efficacy of biologics in achieving EH, specifically in the proximal SB of patients with CD, remain limited.

To assess the effectiveness of biologics for EH in patients with jejunal and/or proximal ileal CD.

Between 2017 and 2023, we retrospectively included 110 consecutive patients with isolated proximal SB CD, identified through baseline balloon-assisted enteroscopy. These patients completed 1-year of treatment with infliximab, ustekinumab, or vedolizumab, and underwent a second balloon-assisted enteroscopy at 1 year. Complete EH was defined as a modified Simple Endoscopic Score for CD (SES-CD) of < 3, while EH of the jejunum and proximal ileum was defined as a segmental modified SES-CD of 0.

In total, 64 patients were treated with infliximab, 28 with ustekinumab, and 18 with vedolizumab. The complete EH rate at 1 year was 20.9% (23/110), with 29.6% (19/64) for infliximab, 10.7% (3/28) for ustekinumab, and 5.5% (1/18) for vedolizumab. The median modified SES-CD significantly decreased compared to baseline [5 (2-8) vs 8 (6-9), P < 0.001]. The jejunal and proximal ileal EH rates at 1 year were 30.8% (12/39) and 15.5% (16/103), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that stricturing or penetrating disease [odds ratio (OR) = 0.261, 95%CI: 0.087-0.778, P = 0.016], prior exposure to biologics (OR = 0.080, 95%CI: 0.010-0.674, P = 0.020), and moderate-to-severe endoscopic disease (OR = 0.277, 95%CI: 0.093-0.829, P = 0.022) were associated with a lower likelihood of achieving EH at 1 year.

Only 20.9% of patients with isolated proximal SB CD achieved complete EH after 1 year of biologic therapy.

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits the binding of the α4β7 integrin, has been approved for treating inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Long-term safety studies of VDZ in clinical trials identified Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) as the major opportunistic infection.

We aimed to address the incidence and risk factors of C. difficile colonization (CDC) and CDI in a real-world setting among IBD patients treated with VDZ.

Retrospective multicenter study.

We retrospectively included IBD patients who tested negative for C. difficile before initiating standard VDZ therapy at four tertiary hospitals from November 1, 2021, to November 31, 2023. The primary outcome was the occurrence of CDC after VDZ initiation, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of CDI and severe CDI.

A total of 454 patients were included in the final analysis. The median follow-up time was 12.9 (8.2-16.3) months, and the study was followed for 2488.6 person-months. The CDC occurred in 28 patients (6.2%), including 23 (11.4%) patients with ulcerative colitis (UC; 18 asymptomatic carriers and 5 with symptomatic CDI) and 5 (2.0%) patients with Crohn's disease (asymptomatic carriers). Multivariate analysis showed that age >40 years old and UC were independent risk factors for the occurrence of the CDC after VDZ initiation. The incidence of CDI was 1.1%, and all patients were able to continue VDZ therapy after receiving antibiotic treatment. No risk factors were found to be significantly associated with CDI. There were no cases of severe CDI or deaths within 30 days.

The incidence of CDC after VDZ treatment was 6.2% and the majority of patients identified as asymptomatic carriers and were able to continue VDZ treatment. Age (>40 years old) and UC were the risk factors for CDC.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) comprise a group of chronic gastrointestinal disorders characterized by periods of relapse and remission. The mainstay of treatment is medical, involving medications such as steroids, immune modulators, monoclonal antibodies (categorized as biologics), and small molecules. These medications can provide profound therapeutic benefits, but they can also cause severe and irreversible toxicities. Clinicians may utilize laboratory tests in the diagnosis and management of IBD including assessment of disease activity, monitoring medication response or toxicity, surveillance of infectious complications, and detection of nutritional deficiencies. Routine use of laboratory tests may help clinicians avoid reactivation of life-threatening infections such as tuberculosis or hepatitis B virus upon initiation of immune suppressive therapy. They can also be used to detect vitamin deficiencies such as B12 deficiency, which has the potential to cause irreversible neurologic damage. While some laboratory tests constitute established practices, the utility of newer tests such therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in the era of biologics is an evolving topic. Although clinical assessment with imaging, endoscopic, and histopathological examination is standard practice, laboratory tests serve as valuable adjuncts. We aim to explore the broad range of laboratory tests available to clinicians and to summarize their application in the current management of IBD in daily clinical practice, with special attention to updates in therapeutic drug monitoring.

Mucosa-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells are a large population of unconventional T cells widely distributed in the human gastrointestinal tract. Their homing to the gut is central to maintaining mucosal homeostasis and immunity. This review discusses the potential mechanisms that guide MAIT cells to the intestinal mucosa during homeostasis and inflammation, emphasizing the roles of chemokines, chemokine receptors, and tissue adhesion molecules. The potential influence of the gut microbiota on MAIT cell homing to different regions of the human gut is also discussed. Last, we introduce how organoid technology offers a potentially valuable approach to advance our understanding of MAIT cell tissue homing by providing a more physiologically relevant model that mimics the human gut tissue. These models may enable a detailed investigation of the gut-specific homing mechanisms of MAIT cells. By understanding the regulation of MAIT cell homing to the human gut, potential avenues for therapeutic interventions targeting gut inflammatory conditions such as inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) may emerge.

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) show an inadequate response or experience a loss of response to advanced therapies. Guidelines recommend dose optimization and switching among therapies until an optimal treatment response is attained. With several advanced treatments available, we aimed to evaluate the persistence of different therapeutic sequences in IBD. The RECORDED study was a retrospective cohort study of Canadians with moderate-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD) who had been exposed to more than 1 advanced therapy between May 2015 and April 2021 for UC, and May 2016 and April 2021 for CD. The primary endpoint was time to permanent discontinuation of the first advanced treatment. Overall, 330 patients had CD and 344 had UC. The most common first-line treatments for CD and UC were adalimumab and infliximab, respectively. The median (95% CI) time to permanent discontinuation of first-line treatment was 12.3 (10.9, 13.6) months in patients with CD and 9.2 (8.2, 10.8) months for those with UC. The most common reason for treatment change across both diseases was lack of efficacy. First-line advanced treatments were optimized in 191 (58.1%) CD patients and 202 (59.1%) UC patients prior to permanent discontinuation. Second-line therapy was typically from a different class compared with the first-line treatment choice. The RECORDED study provides insights into the real-world sequencing and optimization patterns of advanced treatments in patients with moderate-to-severe IBD in Canada. Lack of efficacy was the most cited reason for switching to a different therapy.

Understanding placebo rates is critical for efficient clinical trial design. We assessed placebo rates and associated factors using individual patient data from Crohn's disease trials.

We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2/3 placebo-controlled trials evaluating advanced therapies in moderate to severe Crohn's disease (2010-2021). Deidentified individual patient data were obtained through Vivli Inc and the Yale University Open Data Access Project. Primary outcomes were clinical response and remission. Pooled placebo rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using 1- and 2-stage meta-analytic approaches. Regression analyses identified patient-level factors associated with placebo rates.

Analysis of individual patient data from 8 induction (n = 1147) and 4 maintenance (n = 524) trials showed overall placebo clinical response and remission rates for induction were 27% (95% CI, 23%-32%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-14%), respectively, and 32% (95% CI, 23%-42%) and 22% (95% CI, 14%-33%) for maintenance, respectively. Among biologic (bio)-naïve patients, placebo response and remission rates during induction were 29% (95% CI, 24%-35%) and 11% (95% CI, 8%-15%) respectively, and 26% (95% CI, 20%-33%) and 10% (95% CI, 8%-14%) for biologic (bio)-exposed patients, respectively. During maintenance, biologic-naïve response and remission rates were 41% (95% CI, 34%-48%) and 32% (95% CI, 24%-40%), respectively, and 29% (95% CI, 24%-34%) and 16% (95% CI, 13%-21%) for bio-exposed, respectively. Higher baseline C-reactive protein concentration predicted lower placebo rates, whereas higher baseline albumin levels and body mass index increased the odds of placebo outcomes. Increased baseline Crohn's Disease Activity Index and 2-item patient-reported outcome scores predicted higher response rates in induction, lower response rates in maintenance, and lower remission rates in induction and maintenance.

Patient- and trial-level characteristics influence placebo rates in Crohn's disease trials. Careful implementation of eligibility criteria, outcome definitions, and patient stratification may reduce placebo rates.

Despite the success of biological therapies in treating inflammatory bowel disease, managing patients remains challenging due to the absence of reliable predictors of therapy response.

In this study, we prospectively sampled 2 cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease receiving the anti-integrin α4β7 antibody vedolizumab. Samples were subjected to mass cytometry; single-cell RNA sequencing; single-cell B and T cell receptor sequencing (BCR/TCR-seq); serum proteomics; and multiparametric flow cytometry to comprehensively assess vedolizumab-induced immunologic changes in the peripheral blood and their potential associations with treatment response.

Vedolizumab treatment led to substantial alterations in the abundance of circulating immune cell lineages and modified the T-cell receptor diversity of gut-homing CD4+ memory T cells. Through integration of multimodal parameters and machine learning, we identified a significant increase in proliferating CD4+ memory T cells among nonresponders before treatment compared with responders. This predictive T-cell signature demonstrated an activated T-helper 1/T-helper 17 cell phenotype and exhibited elevated levels of integrin α4β1, potentially making these cells less susceptible to direct targeting by vedolizumab.

These findings provide a reliable predictive classifier with significant implications for personalized inflammatory bowel disease management.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, is a group of chronic, immune-mediated disorders of the gastrointestinal tract that present substantial clinical challenges owing to their complex pathophysiology and tendency to relapse. A treat-to-target approach is recommended, involving iterative treatment adjustments to achieve clinical response, reduce inflammatory markers and achieve long-term goals such as mucosal healing. Lifelong medication is often necessary to manage the disease, maintain remission and prevent complications. The therapeutic landscape for IBD has evolved substantially; however, a ceiling on therapeutic efficacy remains and surgery is sometimes required (owing to uncontrolled disease activity or complications). Effective IBD management involves comprehensive care, including medication adherence and a collaborative clinician-patient relationship. This Review discusses current therapeutic options for IBD, detailing mechanisms of action, efficacy, safety profiles and guidelines for use of each drug class. We also explore emerging therapies and the role of surgery. Additionally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team and personalized care in managing IBD is emphasized, advocating for patient empowerment and involvement in treatment decisions. By synthesizing current knowledge and emerging trends, this Review aims to equip healthcare professionals with a thorough understanding of therapeutic options for IBD, enhancing informed, evidence-based decisions in clinical practice.

Extensive research has investigated the etiology of Crohn's disease (CD), encompassing genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors, and environmental triggers. Recently, the gut microbiome, recognized as the human body's second-largest gene pool, has garnered significant attention for its crucial role in the pathogenesis of CD. This paper investigates the mechanisms underlying CD, focusing on the role of 'creeping fat' in disease progression and exploring emerging therapeutic strategies, including fecal microbiota transplantation, enteral nutrition, and therapeutic diets. Creeping fat has been identified as a unique pathological feature of CD and has recently been found to be associated with dysbiosis of the gut microbiome. We characterize this dysbiotic state by identifying key microbiome-bacteria, fungi, viruses, and archaea, and their contributions to CD pathogenesis. Additionally, this paper reviews contemporary therapies, emphasizing the potential of biological therapies like fecal microbiota transplantation and dietary interventions. By elucidating the complex interactions between host-microbiome dynamics and CD pathology, this article aims to advance our understanding of the disease and guide the development of more effective therapeutic strategies for managing CD.

In contrast to previous network meta-analysis using classical frequentist methods, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of six frequently-used biologics through a Bayesian method.

Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, comparing Infliximab, Adalimumab, Certolizumab pegol, Ustekinumab, Risankizumab, or Vedolizumab, relative to placebo or an active comparator for induction of clinical response (two different definitions) and maintenance of clinical remission. A random-effects model was performed with rankings according to the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probability. Finally, we completed sensitivity and consistency analyses, and evaluated the certainty of evidence through GRADE working group guidance.

We identified 22 and 20 RCTs for induction and maintenance therapy, respectively. Infliximab combined with azathioprine was most effective for inducing clinical response in TNF (tumor necrosis factor) antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab (SUCRA 86.19) and Risankizumab (SUCRA 62.56) have the largest SUCRA in induction of clinical response. Risankizumab has the lowest risk of adverse events (SUCRA 84.81), serious adverse events (SUCRA 94.23), and serious infections (SUCRA 79.73) in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab rank highest for maintaining clinical remission.

This analysis suggests that Infliximab in combination with azathioprine may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy in TNF antagonist-naïve patients. For TNF antagonist-experienced patients, Ustekinumab and Risankizumab may be preferred biologic agents for induction therapy. Risankizumab potentially has the lowest safety risk worth exploring in induction therapy. Adalimumab and the 10 mg/kg regimen of Infliximab have maintenance efficacy benefits for responders to induction therapy.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=458609, Identifier CRD42023458609.

Although biologics have been revolutionizing the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) over the past decade, a significant number of patients still fail to benefit from these drugs. Overcoming the nonresponse to biologics is one of the top challenges in IBD treatment. In this study, we revealed that hyaluronan (HA), an extracellular matrix (ECM) component in the gut, is associated with nonresponsiveness to infliximab and vedolizumab therapy in patients with IBD. In murine colitis models, inhibition of HA synthase 2-mediated (HAS2-mediated) HA synthesis sensitized the therapeutic response to infliximab. Mechanistically, HA induced the expression of MMP3 in colonic fibroblasts by activating STAT3 signaling, thereby mediating the proteolytic cleavage of multiple IgG1 biologics. Finally, we found that macrophage-derived factors upregulated HAS2 expression in fibroblasts, thereby contributing to infliximab nonresponse. In summary, we identified a pathogenic connection between abnormal ECM remodeling and biologics nonresponse and provided insights for the precise therapy for IBD.

Treatment options for patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or concomitant IBD and extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) are often limited.

This study aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of combining biologics or small molecules in patients with refractory IBD, active EIM, or active immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID).

This was a retrospective and multicenter study.

We retrospectively collected demographics and disease characteristics from 47 patients with IBD who received dual-targeted therapy in 3 hospitals from January 2022 to June 2024. The primary endpoint was clinical remission based on the Harvey-Bradshaw index or patient-reported outcome 2 after at least 4 months of combination therapy. The secondary endpoints included clinical response, endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission, as well as all adverse events that occurred within the period of combination therapy.

In total, 47 IBD patients including 37 with refractory IBD, 5 with active EIM, and 5 with active IMID received dual-targeted therapy, of which 37 achieved clinical response (78.7%) and 27 achieved clinical remission (57.4%) at a median follow-up time of 13.0 months. Among these 47 patients, 29 patients underwent endoscopic follow-up, of which 15 (51.7%) achieved endoscopic response and 8 (27.6%) achieved endoscopic remission at a median follow-up time of 9.0 months. Mild and moderate adverse events were reported in 17 (36.2%) patients within the period of combination therapy, and serious adverse events requiring hospitalization occurred in 1 patient (2.1%).

The combination therapy of biologics and small molecules for refractory IBD or those with concomitant EIM/IMID is effective and safe.