Accumulating evidence suggests local consolidative therapy may delay resistance and benefit metastatic NSCLC patients with oligo-residual disease (ORD) after effective systemic therapy. However, the incidence and clinical features of ORD in Alectinib-treated metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed serial scans of metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients treated with Alectinib. ORD was defined as the presence of five or fewer residual metastatic lesions (including the primary site) among those developed partial response as the best response after Alectinib treatment. Initial patterns of recurrence were classified as involving only residual-site recurrence (RR), only new-site recurrence (NR), or a combination of both (RNR). Among 128 patients, 62 patients had PR as the best response, among whom 18 (29.0%) had ORD. The median time to tumor volume nadir was 4.9 (range, 1.1-19.2) months and no independent predictor of ORD was found. To date, 50.0% (9/18) patients with ORD developed their initial progressive disease (PD), mostly (5, 55.6%) with only residual sites. Among the 9 PD patients, 6 patients (6/9, 66.7%) with brain lesions at baseline. Half (3/6, 50.0%) were involved in only brain residual sites. Our study found ORD is not rare in Alectinib treated ALK-positive NSCLC, with 55.6% having initial PD at originally involved sites. Similar recurrence pattern is also observed in PD patients with baseline BMs. These findings indicate that residual disease may enable the emergence of acquired resistance in both CNS and other organs, thus supporting potential clinical benefits for LCT in these ORD patients. Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Oligo-recurrence refers to the presence of a limited number of metachronous recurrences that can be treated with radical local therapy, and most patients have a good prognosis. However, the clinical course after local therapy for oligo-recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) varies, and the prognostic factors are unclear. The aim of this study was to elucidate the prognostic factors of patients with oligo-recurrence of NSCLC who underwent radical local therapy.

Between 2004 and 2015, 901 patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC were included. We defined oligo-recurrence as two or fewer recurrences and retrospectively examined the factors that affected post-recurrence survival in patients who underwent radical local therapy for oligo-recurrence.

Recurrence was confirmed in 267 patients, and among them, 125 experienced oligo-recurrence. Eighty-five patients with oligo-recurrence received local therapy, and their 5-year post-recurrence survival rate was 42.8%. Multivariable analysis of the prognostic factors of these patients revealed that single recurrence (hazard ratio = 2.19, P = 0.005) and systemic therapy (hazard ratio = 1.75, P = 0.043) were significant favorable prognostic factors associated with post-recurrence survival. However, the presence or absence of epidermal growth factor gene mutations, which is generally a prognostic factor for NSCLC recurrence, did not affect the prognosis of these patients.

The number of recurrences and receiving systemic therapy are important prognostic factors for patients with oligo-recurrence who undergo radical local therapy, and these patients have a particularly favorable prognosis.

Through deeper understanding of targetable driver mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) over the past years, some patients with driver mutations have benefited from the targeted molecular therapies. Although the anaplastic lymphoma kinase and BRAF mutations are not frequent subtypes in NSCLC, the availability of several targeted-drugs has been confirmed through a series of clinical trials. But little is clear about the proper strategy in rare BRAF G469A mutation, not to mention co-exhibition of anaplastic lymphoma kinase and BRAF G469A mutations, which is extremely rare in NSCLC.

We present a patient to stage IVA lung adenocarcinoma with coexisting echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 rearrangement and BRAF G469A mutation. She received several targeted drugs with unintended resistance and suffered from unbearable adverse events.

Due to the rarity of co-mutations, the case not only enriches the limited literature on NSCLC harbouring BRAF G469A and echinoderm microtubule associated protein like-4 mutations, but also suggests the efficacy and safety of specific multiple-drug therapy in such patients.

Weight gain is a known adverse event (AE) of alectinib. This study evaluates the progression of actual weight gain over time and explores its association with baseline characteristics.

A pooled analysis of individual patient data from four clinical trials (ALEX, J-ALEX, ALUR, and ML29453) was conducted. Actual weight gain was calculated as the percent change from baseline. A linear mixed model estimated weight change over time and associations between clinical characteristics and weight change.

Follow-up weights were available for three trials (J-ALEX, ALUR, and ML29453) and missing for ALEX. In total, 2,622 weights were recorded in the first year (N = 302). At baseline, 13.6% of the Japanese population were underweight and 5.0% in the Western population. Actual weight gain of any grade was substantially higher than reported AE rates (49% v 5%), with 18% experiencing ≥10% weight gain (from median 55.6 kg to 64.1 kg). Time on alectinib was positively associated with weight change (β = .37; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.51; P < .001), corresponding to an average increase of 4.4% over 1 year. Baseline BMI was not associated with weight change in J-ALEX (β = -.090 [95% CI, -0.19 to 0.012]; P = .092) and ALUR/ML29453 (β = -.016 [95% CI, -0.077 to 0.044]; P = .59). Baseline albumin was positively associated with weight change in ALUR/ML29453 (β = .084 [95% CI, 0.027 to 0.14]; P = .0045), although not considered a clinically meaningful predictor.

Weight gain is under-reported as AE in trials. Actual weights showed ≥10% weight gain in 18% of patients. Clinicians should be aware of this AE, emphasizing the importance of timely identification and monitoring weight. Identifying predictors for weight gain remains challenging.

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC has rapidly evolved following the approval of several ALK TKIs in Canada. However, public funding of ALK TKIs is mostly limited to the first line treatment setting. Using linked provincial health administrative databases, we examined real-world outcomes of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC receiving ALK TKIs in Ontario between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the treatment groups. A total of 413 patients were identified. Patients were administered alectinib (n = 154), crizotinib (n = 80), or palliative-intent chemotherapy (n = 55) in the first-line treatment. There was a significant difference in first-line PFS between the treatment groups. The median PFS (mPFS) was not reached for alectinib (95% CI, 568 days-not reached), compared to 8.2 months (95% CI, 171-294 days) for crizotinib (HR = 0.34, p < 0.0001) and 2.4 months (95% CI, 65-100 days) for chemotherapy (HR = 0.14, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in first-line OS between the treatment groups. In patients who received more than one line of treatment, there was a significant difference in mOS between patients who received two or more lines of ALK TKIs compared to those who received one line of ALK TKI (mOS = 55 months (95% CI, 400-987 days) and 26 months (95% CI, 1448-2644 days), respectively, HR = 4.64, p < 0.0001). This study confirms the effectiveness of ALK TKIs in real-world practice and supports the potential benefit of multiple lines of ALK TKI on overall survival in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.

Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (EIMS) is a distinct subtype of inflammatory myofibroblastoma tumor (IMT) that is recognized as a rare malignant tumor characterized by anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positivity, significant aggressiveness, treatment challenges, and a poor prognosis. We report on the case of an 8-year-old boy presenting with abdominal pain and vomiting. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen revealed a large tumor, and the pathology results following a biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of EIMS. The patient underwent radical tumor resection, and genetic testing identified the presence of the RANBP2-ALK fusion. To our knowledge, this represents the largest pediatric case of abdominal EIMS documented in the literature. Currently, there is no standard therapy for EIMS; however, existing studies advocate for the use of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in its treatment. This case was reported to be in remission following treatment with crizotinib, thereby contributing to the understanding of the specific pathology of EIMS and facilitating accurate diagnosis and targeted therapy.

Targeting the drug tolerant persister (DTP) state in cancer cells should prevent further development of resistance mechanisms. This study explored combination therapies to inhibit alectinib-induced DTP cell formation from anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK + NSCLC) patient-derived cells. After drug-screening 3114 compounds, pan-HER inhibitors (ErbB pathway) and tankyrase1/2 inhibitors (Wnt/β-catenin signaling) emerged as top candidates to inhibit alectinib-induced DTP cells growth. We confirmed knockdown of both TNKS1/2 in DTP cells recovered the sensitivity to alectinib. Further, our study suggested knockdown of TNKS1/2 increased stability of Axin1/2, which induced β-catenin degradation and decreased its nuclear translocation, thereby suppressing transcription of antiapoptotic and proliferation-related genes (survivin, c-MYC). Targeting both pathways with alectinib+pan-HER inhibitor and alectinib+TNKS1/2 inhibitor suppressed alectinib-induced DTP cells, and the triple combination almost completely prevented the appearance of DTP cells. In conclusion, combination with ALK-TKI, pan-HER and TNKS1/2 inhibitors has the potential to prevent the emergence of DTP in ALK + NSCLC.

Next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) demonstrate superior progression-free survival (PFS) over chemotherapy or crizotinib as first-line (1L) treatment of ALK-positive advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC).

We conducted network meta-analyses (NMAs) comparing the relative efficacy of lorlatinib with other ALK TKIs in this indication. Evidence identified from a systematic literature review and subsequent updates formed the basis of our evidence. The primary analysis investigated PFS by independent review committee (IRC) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included PFS among subgroups, intracranial time to progression (IC TTP), adverse events, and discontinuation due to adverse events. For each of the outcomes, Bayesian proportional hazards NMAs estimated the relative treatment effects. Additionally, we compared the design and results of eight published NMAs conducted for 1L ALK + advanced NSCLC to date.

We formed a network of 10 trials, allowing indirect treatment comparisons. Two trials directly compared alectinib (600 mg twice daily) to crizotinib and one trial directly compared lorlatinib to crizotinib. The results of the NMA show that the hazard ratios (95 % credible interval [CrI]) for ITT PFS IRC were 0.61 (95 % CrI: 0.39, 0.97) when comparing lorlatinib with alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and 0.57 (95 % CrI: 0.35, 0.93) when comparing lorlatinib with brigatinib. In the review of published NMAs, HRs for lorlatinib versus alectinib (600 mg twice daily) and brigatinib were compared. This comparison confirmed that each published NMA yielded similar results.

Our NMA analysis adds to existing findings and supplements data gaps from other published NMAs. Findings from eight published NMAs consistently supported lorlatinib as a clinically effective 1L treatment for ALK + advanced NSCLC patients compared to other TKIs.

To clarify the cost-effectiveness of comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in Japan, from initial diagnosis to post-standard treatment, using three different strategies.

A decision tree was created using three diagnostic and treatment strategies, assuming that Foundation One CDx (F1CDx), a comprehensive genome panel, was introduced in Japan in June 2019. This comprehensive decision tree includes Markov models, cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), and cost-utility analyses (CUA) of the three strategies from the perspective of Japanese payers. Specifically, Strategy1 involves single-gene testing at the initial diagnosis and F1CDx after standard treatment; Strategy2 involves only single-gene testing at the initial diagnosis; Strategy3 involves F1CDx at the initial diagnosis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the three strategies are estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of the parameter settings.

Strategy3 was dominated for both CUA and CEA. The ICER/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) for Strategy2 versus Strategy1 was USD 13,734 (JPY 2,080,923, USD 1 = JPY 151.39 on April 1st, 2024), which is less than the willingness to pay of USD 45,900 (JPY 7,500,000), and Strategy2 was more cost-effective than Strategy1. F1CDx was not cost-effective compared to multiple simultaneous single tests at the initial diagnosis, either after standard treatment or at the initial diagnosis. Sensitivity analysis also showed that the most influential factor on the ICER for both CEA and CUA was treatment cost.

From both patient benefit and health economic perspectives, introducing F1CDx after standard treatment in June 2019 was not as cost-effective as multiple simultaneous single tests at the initial diagnosis but was more realistic from a health economic perspective than introducing F1CDx at the time of initial diagnosis. Therefore, the policy at the time of F1CDx introduction in Japan was appropriate from a short-term health-economic perspective.

In untreated ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are available directly comparing next-generation ALK-inhibitors. We conducted a sensitivity analysis using the likelihood of being helped or harmed (LHH).

Phase III trials comparing ALK-inhibitors to crizotinib were included. Efficacy outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), PFS in patients with brain metastases and intracranial ORR. Safety outcomes were grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs), dose reductions and discontinuations.

Six RCTs (1524 patients) were included. Lorlatinib and brigatinib had the lowest NNT for intracranial outcomes. Alectinib demonstrated favourable LHHs for grade 3-4 AEs, dose reductions and discontinuations. Brigatinib LHHs were low for common AEs, mainly laboratory anomalies and hypertension. Ensartinib showed mainly skin toxicity. Lorlatinib LHHs were low for specific grade 3-4 AEs, mainly metabolic alterations.

The four ALK-inhibitors exhibited favourable risk-benefit ratios. Lorlatinib showed the lowest NNT for systemic efficacy and, alongside with Brigatinib, lower NNTs for intracranial efficacy. Alectinib exhibited higher LHHs for AEs.

PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023389101.

Previous results from the phase 3 ALESIA study (NCT02838420) revealed that alectinib (a central nervous system [CNS]-active, ALK inhibitor) had clinical benefits in treatment-naïve Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, consistent with the global ALEX study. We present updated data after more than or equal to 5 years of follow-up from the "last patient in" date.

Adult patients with treatment-naïve, advanced ALK-positive NSCLC from mainland China, South Korea, and Thailand were randomized 2:1 to receive twice-daily 600 mg alectinib (n = 125) or 250 mg crizotinib (n = 62). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Secondary or exploratory endpoints included overall survival, objective response rate, time to CNS progression, and safety.

At the data cutoff (May 16, 2022), the median survival follow-up was 61 and 51 months in the alectinib and crizotinib arms, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 41.6 months with alectinib versus 11.1 months with crizotinib (stratified hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.49). Overall survival data remain immature; 5-year overall survival rates were 66.4% (alectinib arm) versus 56.1% (crizotinib arm). Objective response rate was 91.2% versus 77.4% with alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. CNS progression was delayed with alectinib versus crizotinib (cause-specific hazard ratio = 0.16, 95% confidence interval: 0.08-0.32). Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib versus crizotinib (42.3 versus 12.6 mo). No new safety signals were observed.

With four additional years of follow-up, these updated results confirm the clinical benefit and manageable safety of alectinib in Asian patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, and confirm alectinib as a standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

ALK-positive lung cancers represent a molecularly diverse disease. With drug exposure, driving selection pressure, and resistance pathways, disease relapse will emerge. There is compelling rationale to investigate novel treatment strategies, informed by dynamic circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring.

The single-arm, pilot study ALKTERNATE investigated fixed alternating cycles of lorlatinib intercalated with crizotinib in individuals resistant to second-generation ALK inhibitors. Dynamic ctDNA explored the correlation with disease response and disease recurrence and defined disease resistance. The primary outcome was time-to-treatment failure, a composite of tolerability, feasibility, and efficacy. Secondary outcomes included standard survival measures, toxicity, pharmacokinetic analysis, and patient-reported outcomes. Tertiary outcomes were proteogenomic analyses of tissue and plasma.

A total of 15 individuals were enrolled; three encountered primary resistance to lorlatinib induction. There were 12 participants who received alternating therapy, and this approach revealed safety, feasibility, and effectiveness. Patient-reported outcomes were maintained or improved on therapy, and toxicity was consistent with previous reports. The pharmacokinetic measures were similar to the single-arm drug experience. Median time-to-treatment failure was 10 months; overall survival was 23 months. ctDNA profiles indicated inferior survival in those with preexistent TP53 mutations and those without clear or cleared ctDNA at trial induction. The study defined a vastly heterogeneous population with an abundance of ALK coexisting with non-ALK resistance variants.

ALKTERNATE revealed feasibility with a novel alternating ALK inhibitor strategy in ALK-positive NSCLC. Results support progressing inquiry into this approach and propose a flexible design with drug(s) selected and alternating time frames, informed by real-time plasma profiling. Moving this concept to treatment naive may also optimize impact.

Various next-generation ALK TKIs are available as first-line options for ALK-positive NSCLC, with alectinib and lorlatinib being commonly preferred. However, no direct comparison between them has been conducted, making it impossible to pick a winner. We performed an analytic, 'non-comparative' assessment of the two phase 3 pivotal clinical trials showing superiority of alectinib (ALEX) and lorlatinib (CROWN) in comparison to crizotinib. Overall, the two studies were very similar in the study design and patient characteristics, with the exception of the selection and evaluation of brain metastases. PFS hazard ratios numerically favored lorlatinib, both according to the investigator and to BICR. Notably, the 3-year PFS rate was numerically higher with lorlatinib (64%) than with alectinib (46.4%). Despite similar response rates and overall intracranial response, the rate of complete intracranial response was higher with lorlatinib, with a cumulative incidence risk of CNS disease progression at 12 months of 9.4% with alectinib and 2.8% with lorlatinib. The peculiar toxicities of lorlatinib were related to lipidic profile alterations, peripheral oedema and cognitive effects, with no impact on cardiovascular risk nor impairment in quality of life versus crizotinib. Furthermore, the rate of permanent treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was numerically higher with alectinib (26%) than with lorlatinib (7%). In conclusion, despite the immature OS data for both drugs, the efficacy of lorlatinib appears higher than alectinib while maintaining a manageable toxicity profile.

Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) is a new-generation, potent ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has been found to have systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC. We compared the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib with crizotinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive, locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC.

In this open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study, patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily (7-d run-in at 60 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included PFS by investigator, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, intracranial ORR and time to CNS progression by IRC and investigator, overall survival, and safety. An interim analysis was planned after approximately 70% (134 events) of all 192 expected PFS events assessed by IRC were observed. Efficacy was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the safety population, which included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. This study is registered with Center for Drug Evaluation of China National Medical Products Administration (CTR20191231) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04632758).

From September 4, 2019, to December 2, 2020, a total of 292 patients were randomized and treated; 143 with iruplinalkib and 149 with crizotinib. At this interim analysis (145 events), the median follow-up time was 26.7 months (range: 3.7-37.7) in the iruplinalkib group and 25.9 months (range: 0.5-35.9) in the crizotinib group. The PFS assessed by IRC was significantly longer among patients in the iruplinalkib group (median PFS, 27.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.3-not estimable] versus 14.6 mo [95% CI: 11.1-16.5] in the crizotinib group; hazard ratio, 0.34 [98.02% CI: 0.23-0.52], p < 0.0001). The ORR assessed by IRC was 93.0% (95% CI: 87.5-96.6) in the iruplinalkib group and 89.3% (95% CI: 83.1-93.7) in the crizotinib group. The intracranial ORR was 90.9% (10 of 11, 95% CI: 58.7-99.8) in the iruplinalkib group and 60.0% (nine of 15, 95% CI: 32.3-83.7) in the crizotinib group for patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases. Incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 51.7% in the iruplinalkib group and 49.7% in the crizotinib group.

Iruplinalkib was found to have significantly improved PFS and improved intracranial antitumor activity versus crizotinib. Iruplinalkib may be a new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-positive and ALK TKI-naive NSCLC.

This study was funded by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, People's Republic of China, and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

Lung cancer ranks first in both cancer incidence and mortality in China. The emergence of novel treatments for ALK-positive NSCLC led to an improvement in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced ALK mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of 6 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)-crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and lorlatinib-as first-line treatments for ALK-positive NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.

A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these 6 TKIs. In this model, ALK-positive NSCLC patients were initially simulated to receive 1 of the 6 TKIs as first-line therapy, followed by different TKIs as subsequent treatment and salvage chemotherapy as last-line treatment. Survival data were sourced from the latest published clinical trials. Costs were derived from recent national health insurance negotiations and hospital information systems of selected health care facilities. Utilities for healthy states and adverse events were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis as well as scenario analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the results.

Compared to ensartinib, crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib demonstrated incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of -1.13, 0.39, -0.58, -0.09, and 0.35, respectively. The corresponding incremental costs were $10 677, $33 501, -$6426, $2672, and $24 358. This resulted in ICERs of -$9449/QALY, $85 900/QALY, $11 079/QALY, $29 689/QALY and $69 594/QALY, respectively.

Crizotinib was considered to be absolutely dominated by ensartinib. Under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38 223/QALY, ceritinib and brigatinib were cost-effective compared with ensartinib, while lorlatinib and alectinib were not cost-effective when compared with ensartinib. Overall, brigatinib emerged as the most cost-effective treatment among all the options considered.

About 3%-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) presents positive anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). Recently, several target agents have been approved as a treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. This study aimed to analyze the real-world efficacy and outcome when administered crizotinib, the first approved target agent for ALK-positive NSCLC, according to first- or late-line treatment.

A total of 290 patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were treated with crizotinib in 15 institutions in South Korea from January 2009 to December 2018 were enrolled.

The median age of patients was 57.0 years, and 50.3% were male. The median follow-up duration was 29.3 months. Among them, 113 patients received crizotinib as first-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 60.1% (57.0% for first-line recipients, 61.8% for second-/later-line). Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 (11.6-17.0) months. For first-line recipients, overall survival (OS) was 26.3 (17.6-35.0) months. No significant difference in ORR, PFS and OS, according to the setting of crizotinib initiation, was observed. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, old age, male gender, initially metastatic, and number of metastatic organs were associated with poor PFS and OS. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting, and severe adverse event leading to dose adjustment was hepatotoxicity.

ORR, PFS, OS, and adverse event profiles were comparable to previous clinical trials. Our findings could aid in the efficient management of ALK-positive lung cancer patients.

Several rare anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions have been identified in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, their treatment is not currently uniform. alectinib has been commonly used to treat rare ALK fusions in patients with NSCLC. This is the first study to report the occurrence of a uridine diphosphate-glucose pyrophosphorylase 2 (UGP2)-ALK fusion in a patient with NSCLC. The patient, who was hospitalized because of shortness of breath lasting 20 days, showed hydrothorax of the left lung under a computerized tomography chest scan. Pathological histology revealed lung adenocarcinoma in the patient. The UGP2-ALK mutation was found by next-generation sequencing. Subsequently, the patient was administered alectinib, and thereafter, the tumor lesion was observed to gradually shrink over the follow-up period. Progression-free survival reached 10 months as of the follow-up date, with no adverse events detected. This case report provides valuable insights into the clinical management of NSCLC patients with UGP2-ALK fusions. Moreover, alectinib is confirmed to be an appropriate therapeutic agent for such patients.

Amplification of the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) gene plays an important role in anticancer drug resistance to anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) in echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK)-rearranged lung cancer cells. We encountered an ALK-rearranged lung cancer patient who developed MET amplification after alectinib treatment and showed an effective response to fifth-line crizotinib. First-line alectinib treatment was effective for 2.5 years; however, liver metastases exacerbated. Liver biopsy specimens revealed MET and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplifications. Switching to the MET inhibitor crizotinib improved liver metastases. Crizotinib may be effective in ALK-positive patients with MET amplification.

Cancer cell resistance arises when tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapies induce a drug-tolerant persister (DTP) state with growth via genetic aberrations, making DTP cells potential therapeutic targets. We screened an anti-cancer compound library and identified fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) promoting alectinib-induced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion-positive DTP cell's survival. FGFR1 signaling promoted DTP cell survival generated from basal FGFR1- and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)-high protein expressing cells, following alectinib treatment, which is blocked by FGFR inhibition. The hazard ratio for progression-free survival of ALK-TKIs increased in patients with ALK fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer with FGFR1- and FGF2-high mRNA expression at baseline. The combination of FGFR and targeted TKIs enhanced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis induction in basal FGFR1- and FGF2-high protein expressing cells with ALK-rearranged and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-amplified breast cancer, or v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)-mutated melanoma by preventing compensatory extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) reactivation. These results suggest that a targeted TKI-induced DTP state results from an oncogenic switch from activated oncogenic driver signaling to the FGFR1 pathway in basal FGFR1- and FGF2-high expressing cancers and initial dual blockade of FGFR and driver oncogenes based on FGFR1 and FGF2 expression levels at baseline is a potent treatment strategy to prevent acquired drug resistance to targeted TKIs through DTP cells regardless of types of driver oncogenes.

Fusions and mutations of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), a tyrosine kinase receptor, have been identified in several neoplastic diseases. Rearranged ALK is a driver of tumorigenesis, which activates various signaling pathway associated with proliferation and survival. To date, several agents that target and inhibit ALK have been developed. The most studied ALK-positive disease is non-small cell lung cancer, and three generations of ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for the treatment of metastatic disease. Nevertheless, the use of ALK-TKIs is associated with acquired resistance (resistance mutations, bypass signaling), which leads to disease progression and may require a substitution or introduction of other treatment agents. Understanding of the complex nature and network of resistance mutations may allow to introduce sequential and targeted therapies. In this review, we aim to summarize the efficacy and safety profile of ALK inhibitors, describe off-target anticancer effects, and discuss resistance mechanisms in the context of personalized oncology.

Small-molecule drugs have enabled the practice of precision oncology for genetically defined patient populations since the first approval of imatinib in 2001. Scientific and technology advances over this 20-year period have driven the evolution of cancer biology, medicinal chemistry, and data science. Collectively, these advances provide tools to more consistently design best-in-class small-molecule drugs against known, previously undruggable, and novel cancer targets. The integration of these tools and their customization in the hands of skilled drug hunters will be necessary to enable the discovery of transformational therapies for patients across a wider spectrum of cancers.

Target-centric small-molecule drug discovery necessitates the consideration of multiple approaches to identify chemical matter that can be optimized into drug candidates. To do this successfully and consistently, drug hunters require a comprehensive toolbox to avoid following the "law of instrument" or Maslow's hammer concept where only one tool is applied regardless of the requirements of the task. Combining our ever-increasing understanding of cancer and cancer targets with the technological advances in drug discovery described below will accelerate the next generation of small-molecule drugs in oncology.

The phase 2, single-arm, multicenter, open-label J-ALTA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One expansion cohort of J-ALTA enrolled patients previously treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); the main cohort included patients with prior alectinib ± crizotinib. The second expansion cohort enrolled patients with TKI-naive ALK+ NSCLC. All patients received brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in at 90 mg daily). Among 47 patients in the main cohort, 5 (11%) remained on brigatinib at the study end (median follow-up: 23 months). In this cohort, the independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 34% (95% CI, 21%-49%); median duration of response was 14.8 months (95% CI, 5.5-19.4); median IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-12.9). Among 32 patients in the TKI-naive cohort, 25 (78%) remained on brigatinib (median follow-up: 22 months); 2-year IRC-assessed PFS was 73% (90% CI, 55%-85%); IRC-assessed ORR was 97% (95% CI, 84%-100%); the median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 19.4-not reached); 2-year duration of response was 70%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 68% and 91% of TKI-pretreated and TKI-naive patients, respectively. Exploratory analyses of baseline circulating tumor DNA in ALK TKI-pretreated NSCLC showed associations between poor PFS and EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 and TP53. Brigatinib is an important treatment option for Japanese patients with ALK+ NSCLC, including patients previously treated with alectinib.

Alectinib is a standard-of-care treatment for metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. Weight gain is an unexplored side effect reported in approximately 10%. To prevent or intervene alectinib-induced weight gain, more insight in its extent and etiology is needed.

Change in body composition was analyzed in a prospective series of 46 patients with ALK+ NSCLC, treated with alectinib. Waist circumference, visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and skeletal muscle were quantified using sliceOmatic software on computed tomography images at baseline, 3 months (3M), and 1 year (1Y). To investigate an exposure-toxicity relationship, alectinib plasma concentrations were quantified. Four patients with more than 10 kg weight gain were referred to Erasmus MC Obesity Center CGG for in-depth analysis (e.g., assessments of appetite, dietary habits, other lifestyle, medical and psychosocial factors, and extensive metabolic and endocrine assessments, including resting energy expenditure).

Mean increase in waist circumference was 9 cm (9.7%, p < 0.001) in 1Y with a 40% increase in abdominal obesity (p = 0.014). VAT increased to 10.8 cm2 (15.0%, p = 0.003) in 3M and 35.7 cm2 (39.0%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. SAT increased to 18.8 cm2 (12.4%, p < 0.001) in 3M and 45.4 cm2 (33.3%, p < 0.001) in 1Y. The incidence of sarcopenic obesity increased from 23.7% to 47.4% during 1Y of treatment. Baseline waist circumference was a positive predictor of increase in VAT (p = 0.037). No exposure-toxicity relationship was found. In-depth analysis (n = 4) revealed increased appetite in two patients and metabolic syndrome in all four patients.

Alectinib may cause relevant increased sarcopenic abdominal obesity, with increases of both VAT and SAT, quickly after initiation. This may lead to many serious metabolic, physical, and mental disturbances in long-surviving patients.

To date, no direct comparisons have compared the effectiveness of all ALK inhibitors (ALKis) against ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ALKis in ALK-positive NSCLC.

The effectiveness of ALKis was evaluated by assessing progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and PFS with baseline brain metastasis (BM). The serious adverse events (SAEs: Grade ≥ 3) and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation were pooled to evaluate safety. We conducted an indirect treatment comparison between all ALKis by using a Bayesian model.

Twelve eligible trials including seven treatments were identified. All of the ALKis improved PFS and ORR relative to chemotherapy. Consistent with alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and ensartinib showed significant differences versus crizotinib and ceritinib. Lorlatinib seemed to prolong PFS compared with alectinib (0.64, 0.37 to 1.07), brigatinib (0.56, 0.3 to 1.05), and ensartinib (0.53, 0.28 to 1.02). No significant difference was found among them in OS except for alectinib versus crizotinib. Moreover, alectinib was significantly more effective than crizotinib (1.54, 1.02 to 2.5) in achieving the best ORR. Subgroup analyses based on BM indicated that PFS was dramatically lengthened by lorlatinib. Compared with other ALKis, alectinib notably reduced the rate of SAEs. There was no striking difference between discontinuation for AEs, except for ceritinib versus crizotinib. The ranking of validity showed that lorlatinib had the longest PFS (98.32%) and PFS with BM (85.84%) and the highest ORR (77.01%). The rank of probabilities showed that alectinib had the potentially best safety in terms of SAEs (97.85%), and ceritinib had less discontinuation (95.45%).

Alectinib was the first choice for patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and even for those with BM, whereas lorlatinib was the second choice. Long-term follow-up and prospective studies are warranted to compare ALKis and to verify our conclusions directly.

Alectinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), has demonstrated superior progression-free survival over crizotinib with both 300 mg twice daily (J-ALEX) or 600 mg twice daily (ALEX, ALESIA) dosing in three pivotal clinical trials. Given the similar median PFS achieved in the J-ALEX trial and the Asian subgroup of the ALEX trial, there remains debate about the optimal alectinib dose for Asians. The third pivotal alectinib trial, ALESIA, which was conducted exclusively in Asia to support the registration of alectinib in China, utilized 600 mg alectinib twice daily. The mature PFS was not reached at the initial publication of ALESIA. At ESMO Asia 2022, the 5-year update of ALESIA was presented with an impressive mature investigator-assessed PFS of 41.6 months (95% CI 33.1-58.9), which is numerically longer than the mature PFS of 34.1 months achieved by alectinib at 300 mg twice daily in the J-ALEX trial. Based on these results, as well as retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data, Alectinib at 600 mg twice daily is the optimal dose for Asians. This has been based on the ALESIA trial and on the retrospective pharmacokinetic and responses and PFS data and has set the benchmark for ALK TKI as the first-line treatment for advanced ALK+ NSCLC in Asia. Importantly, lorlatinib, another next generation ALK TKI, also achieved an impressive hazard ratio with a still immature PFS in all patients, including Asian patients, in a recent subgroup analysis after a median follow-up time of 36.7 months. We await the final mature PFS of lorlatinib overall and for Asian patients in the CROWN trial to see if lorlatinib will set a new standard.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement is detected in approximately 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting ALK rearrangement (ALK-TKIs) have shown significant efficacy and improved the survival of patients with NSCLC exhibiting ALK rearrangement. However, almost all patients exhibit disease progression during TKI therapy owing to resistance acquired through various molecular mechanisms, including both ALK-dependent and ALK-independent.

Here, we review the mechanisms underlying resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, and the clinical management strategies following resistance in patients with ALK rearrangement-positive NSCLC.

Treatment strategies following the failure of second-generation ALK-TKIs failure should be based on resistant mechanisms. For patients with ALK mutations who exhibit resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, lorlatinib is the primary treatment option. However, the identification of resistance profiles of second-generation ALK-TKIs can aid in the selection of an appropriate treatment strategy. In cases of ALK-dependent resistance mutations, lorlatinib could be the first choice as it exhibits the broadest coverage of mutations that lead to resistance against second-generation ALK-TKIs, such as G1202R, and L1196M. In cases of no resistance mutations, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, and platinum-based chemotherapy could be the alternative treatment options.

The competing roles of various next-generation ALK TKIs in the first and second line treatment setting of advanced ALK+ NSCLC were based on many phase 3 clinical trials in both the first-line and crizotinib-refractory settings. The approval of all next-generation ALK TKIs was first in the crizotinib-refractory setting, based on a large-scale Phase 2 trial, and was then followed by at least one global randomized phase 3 trial comparing to platinum-based chemotherapy (ASCEND-4) or to crizotinib (ALEX, ALTA-1L, eXalt3, CROWN). In addition, three randomized phase 3 trials in the crizotinib-refractory setting were also conducted by next-generation ALK TKIs that were developed earlier before the superiority of next-generation ALK TKIs was demonstrated in order to secure the approval of these ALK TKIs in the crizotinib-refractory setting. These three crizotinib-refractory randomized trials were: ASCEND-5 (ceritinib), ALUR (alectinib), and ALTA-3 (brigatinib). The outcome of the ATLA-3 trial was recently presented closing out the chapter where next-generation ALK TKIs were investigated in the crizotinib-refractory setting as they have replaced crizotinib as the standard of care first-line treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC. This editorial summarizes the results of next-generation ALK TKIs in randomized crizotinib-refractory trials and provides a perspective on how natural history of ALK+ NSCLC may potentially be altered with sequential treatment. ALTA-3 compared brigatinib to alectinib, showing that both achieved near identical blinded independent review committee (BIRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) (19.2-19.3 months). Importantly, 4.8% of brigatinib-treated patients developed interstitial lung disease (ILD) while no alectinib-treated patients developed ILD. Dose reduction and discontinuation due to treatment-related adverse events were 21% and 5%, respectively, for brigatinib-treated patients compared to 11% and 2%, respectively, for alectinib-treated patients. Upon analysis of these findings, we speculate that brigatinib may have a diminishing role in the treatment of advanced ALK+ NSCLC.

To compare the efficacy and safety of alectinib with other ALK inhibitors in treating patients with metastatic or locally advanced ALK-positive NSCLC.

A systematic literature review was conducted up to November 2021. Network meta-analyses were performed using the frequentist method (random effects). GRADE evidence profile was conducted.

13 RCTs were selected. For overall survival, alectinib was found to reduce the risk of death compared with crizotinib. In progression-free survival, alectinib reduced the risk of death or progression compared with crizotinib and ceritinib. Subgroup analysis by brain metastasis at baseline showed the superiority of alectinib over crizotinib and a similar effect compared with second-and third-generation inhibitors. Alectinib showed a good safety profile compared with the other ALK inhibitors.

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) at diagnosis is rare and leads to poor prognosis with the use of the standard ALCL99 protocol alone. CNS-directed intensive chemotherapy, such as an increased dose of intravenous MTX, increased dose of dexamethasone, intensified intrathecal therapy, and high-dose cytarabine, followed by cranial irradiation, has been shown to improve survival in this population. In this paper, the authors describe a 14-year-old male with an intracranial ALCL mass at onset who received CNS-directed chemotherapy followed by 23.4 Gy of whole-brain irradiation. After the first systemic relapse, the CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor, alectinib, was applied; it has successfully maintained remission for 18 months without any adverse events. CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor therapy might prevent CNS relapse in pediatric ALK-positive ALCL. Next-generation ALK inhibitors could be introduced as a promising treatment option, even for primary ALCL with CNS involvement, which could lead to the omission of cranial irradiation and avoid radiation-induced sequalae. Further evidence of CNS-penetrating ALK inhibitor combined therapy for primary ALK-positive ALCL is warranted to reduce radiation-induced sequalae in future treatments.

Alectinib is a second-generation, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for the treatment of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and is able to induce significant and durable CNS responses. However, long-term use of alectinib has been clinically reported to cause some serious and even life-threatening adverse events. There are currently no effective interventions for its adverse events, and this undoubtedly leads to delays in patient treatment and limits its long-term clinical use.

Based on the clinical trials conducted so far, we summarize the efficacy and adverse events that occurred, especially those related to cardiovascular disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary disorders, musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders, and respiratory disorders. The factors that may influence alectinib selection are also described. Findings are based on a PubMed literature search of clinical and basic science research papers spanning 1998-2023.

The significant prolongation of patient survival compared with first-generation ALK inhibitor suggests its potential as a first-line treatment for the NSCLC, but the severe adverse events of alectinib limit its long-term clinical use. Future research should focus on the exact mechanisms of these toxicities, how to alleviate the adverse events caused by alectinib clinically, and the development of next-generation drugs with reduced toxicities.

Lung cancer (LC) represents the second most diagnosed tumor and the malignancy with the highest mortality rate. In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in the treatment of this tumor thanks to the discovery, testing, and clinical approval of novel therapeutic approaches. Firstly, targeted therapies aimed at inhibiting specific mutated tyrosine kinases or downstream factors were approved in clinical practice. Secondly, immunotherapy inducing the reactivation of the immune system to efficiently eliminate LC cells has been approved. This review describes in depth both current and ongoing clinical studies, which allowed the approval of targeted therapies and immune-checkpoint inhibitors as standard of care for LC. Moreover, the present advantages and pitfalls of new therapeutic approaches will be discussed. Finally, the acquired importance of human microbiota as a novel source of LC biomarkers, as well as therapeutic targets to improve the efficacy of available therapies, was analyzed. Therapy against LC is increasingly becoming holistic, taking into consideration not only the genetic landscape of the tumor, but also the immune background and other individual variables, such as patient-specific gut microbial composition. On these bases, in the future, the research milestones reached will allow clinicians to treat LC patients with tailored approaches.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is an ultra-rare soft tissue neoplasm associated with fusion proteins encompassing the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) protein fused to a variety of partner proteins. Data regarding response to ALK-targeting agents based on fusion partner is limited.

A 30-year-old female sought emergency care after onset of abdominal and lower back pain in 2019. Computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a cystic, mesenteric mass within the pelvis measuring up to 8.9 cm. Complete laparoscopic excision of the mass from the mesentery of the right colon and terminal ileum was performed. Pathologic assessment revealed IMT with a fusion between sequestosome 1 and ALK (SQSTM1::ALK), described in only two other cases of IMT. Four months after surgery, CT revealed multi-focal, unresectable disease recurrence. She was referred to the University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and placed on therapy with alectinib, after which she experienced a partial response. Three years after IMT recurrence, disease remains under control.

This is the third reported case of IMT associated with the novel SQSTM1::ALK fusion protein, and the second treated with alectinib. Treatment with the ALK inhibitor alectinib appears to be active in this setting.

Alectinib is a selective anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor as standard therapy for ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Hemolytic anemia is considered as a rare but significant adverse event with alectinib. Here, we report a case of a 73-year-old female with lung adenocarcinoma, harbouring an ALK fusion gene, who received alectinib as second-line therapy and developed gradually progressive grade 4 (6.4 g/dL) drug-induced hemolytic anemia (DIHA) after complete response. We discontinued alectinib and performed a blood transfusion for the severe anemia. The anemia improved with no recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma over 10 months. Regular hematologic monitoring and the possibility of DIHA should be considered in case of progressive hemolytic anemia during alectinib treatment.