• Segmental resection
• lung cancer
• pulmonary nodules
• thoracoscopic three-dimensional reconstruction

• Humans
• Pneumonectomy/methods
• Female
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Retrospective Studies
• Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods
• Aged
• Adult
• Lung Neoplasms/surgery
• Thoracoscopy/methods
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
• Operative Time
• Length of Stay

• Chest radiography
• Low-dose computed tomography
• Segmentectomy
• Sputum cytology
• Wedge resection

• Humans
• Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis
• Early Detection of Cancer
• Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods
• Radiography, Thoracic
• Sputum
• Mass Screening/methods

• Complications
• Ground–glass nodules
• Lung cancer
• Microwave ablation
• Survival

• Female
• Male
• Humans
• Middle Aged
• Aged
• Microwaves/therapeutic use
• Retrospective Studies
• Lung Neoplasms/surgery
• Pleural Effusion
• Pneumothorax

• Indocyanine green
• Intersegmental plane
• Lung
• Segmentectomy

This study aimed to construct a nomogram to effectively predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

For the training and internal validation cohorts, a total of 26,941 patients with stage I and II NSCLC were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. A nomogram was constructed based on the risk factors affecting prognosis using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. And 505 patients were recruited from Jiaxing First Hospital for external validation. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated by C-index and calibration curves.

A Nomogram was created after identifying independent prognostic factors using univariate and multifactorial factor analysis. The C-index of this nomogram was 0.726 (95% CI, 0.718–0.735) and 0.721 (95% CI, 0.709–0.734) in the training cohort and the internal validation cohort, respectively, and 0.758 (95% CI, 0.691–0.825) in the external validation cohort, which indicates that the model has good discrimination. Calibration curves for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities showed good agreement between predicted and actual survival. In addition, DCA analysis showed that the net benefit of the new model was significantly higher than that of the TNM staging system.

We developed and validated a survival prediction model for patients with non-small cell lung cancer in the early stages. This new nomogram is superior to the traditional TNM staging system and can guide clinicians to make the best clinical decisions.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10067-8.

• 3D, three-dimensional
• CT, computed tomography
• HU, Hounsfield unit
• blood flow
• intersegmental pulmonary vein
• reconstruction
• segmentectomy

For peripheral pulmonary nodules, the regularity of lymph node (LN) metastasis has not been studied. This study aimed to evaluate the metastasis pattern of intrapulmonary and relevant mediastinal lymph nodes in early-stage lung cancer, and further selected patients who were of low risk of LN metastasis as potential population to receive sub-lobectomy.

This study prospectively included consecutive patients with peripheral clinical T1N0M0 disease who underwent complete resection with LN dissection or sampling from August 2014 to July 2015. The patients were followed up to 15, May 2021. Univariable or multivariable Logistic analysis was used to identify the risk factors. Models predicting LN metastasis risk were conducted. The area under the curve for the receiver operating characteristic curves was used to evaluate the diagnostic value. Disease-free survival and overall survival were compared between groups.

Finally, 201 patients were included in this study. For patients with negative tumor-bearing (TB) 13 and 14 station LNs, the positive rate of other lymph node stations was extremely low. Maximum CT value, pleural indentation and CEA level were risk factors for N1 station LNs metastasis. Besides, the factors above and lobulation sign were risk factors for skip metastasis beyond TB 13 and 14 station LNs. We constructed two scoring tables to predict N1 station metastasis and skip metastasis beyond TB 13 and 14 station. The AUC were 0·837 and 0·823, respectively. Based on the first table, 40·9% of patients suffered N1 station LNs metastasis and 27·3% had N2 disease in “high risk group” while the proportion was only 5·7% and 4·5% in “low risk group”. For patients with negative TB13 and TB14 station LNs, based on the latter table, 11·1% of patients had N1 stations LNs metastasis and 16·7% had pN2 disease in “high risk group” while only 2·3% patients in “low risk group” suffered this kind of metastasis.

For peripheral pulmonary nodules patients, stations 13 and 14 LNs may be the sentinel nodes. For patients with low risk of N1 metastasis and skip metastasis, sub-lobar resection might be sufficient for those who were of negative TB 13 and 14 station LNs.

• Major Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province

The increasingly accurate sublobar anatomical resection is constantly being explored and practiced. Surgeons try to preserve as much viable lung tissue as possible. Sublobar resection of the target tissue is similar with a cone‐shaped structure which penetrates deeply into the pulmonary parenchyma and runs through the lobe at both ends. This has not previously been described. The remaining lung tissue resembles the Triumphal Arch in Paris, France. Here, we describe triumphal arch‐like sublobectomy in detail, aiming to provide clinicians with an idea to explore this novel sublobectomy under similar conditions.

• lung cancer
• segmentectomy
• surgery

The objective was to compare overall survival (OS) between lobectomy and segmentectomy for patients with non–small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) > 2 but ≤4 cm.

The National Cancer Database was queried to identify treatment-naïve patients with NSCLC tumors >2 but ≤4 cm. Eligible patients were diagnosed with pT1 or T2 N0 M0 disease, underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy, and received no adjuvant therapy. OS was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional-hazards model was used to identify prognostic factors for death. Propensity score matching was performed to minimize the effects of potential confounders.

Included were 32,792 patients: lobectomy (n = 31,353) and segmentectomy (n = 1439). Five-year OS was improved following lobectomy over segmentectomy for patients with >2 but ≤4 cm NSCLCs (62.3% vs 52.6%; P < .0001). Further stratification demonstrated improved 5-year OS following lobectomy over segmentectomy: >2 but ≤3 cm (64.9% vs 54.3%; P < .0001) and >3 but ≤4 cm (56.9% vs 47.6%; P = .0003). In patients with a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index of 0, 5-year OS was greater following lobectomy for >2 but ≤4 cm tumors (67.1% vs 62.1%; P = .03). Further stratification demonstrated improved 5-year OS following lobectomy for patients with Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index of 0 and > 3 but ≤4 cm tumors (61.8% vs 54.6%; P = .02). Segmentectomy was prognostic for increased risk of death in the year 1 through 5 postoperative period (hazard ratio, 1.35; P < .0001). Five-year OS remained greater following lobectomy after propensity score matching (59.6% vs 52.7%; P = .02).

Lobectomy is associated with superior 5-year OS compared with segmentectomy and may be preferred for NSCLC tumors >2 but ≤4 cm when feasible.

• UL1 TR001855 NCATS NIH HHS

• Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology
• Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/surgery
• Humans
• Lung Neoplasms/pathology
• Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery
• Pneumonectomy/adverse effects
• Retrospective Studies
• Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
• Thoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted/adverse effects

• NSCLC
• lymph node
• lymphadenectomy
• segmentectomy
• sublobar lung resection

The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical efficacy of different thoracoscopic procedures in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and their correlation with matrix metalloproteinase-7 mRNA (MMPs-7 mRNA) and soluble major histocompatibility complex class I molecule A (sMICA), as well as their effect on T-cell subsets.

A total of 100 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received different thoracoscopic surgeries were divided into the Control group (three-port thoracoscopic surgery) and the study group (single-port thoracoscopic surgery). The two groups were evaluated to compare the perioperative indicators, MMPs-7 mRNA, sMICA expression levels, T-cell subsets, postoperative pain, complication rates, and prognostic outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

The operation time, blood loss, drainage tube placement time, incision length, and hospital stay in the study group were less than those in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node dissections between the two groups (P > 0.05). After 3 days, the expression levels of MMPs-7 mRNA and sMICA in the study group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05); CD4 +, CD8 +, and CD4 +/CD8 + in the study group were higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05). On days 1, 3, and 5, the visual analog score (VAS) of the study group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05); there was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two follow-up groups (P > 0.05), in which all patients completed the follow-up. After 1 year of follow-up, there was no significant difference in the tumor-free survival rate and overall survival rate between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Compared with three-port thoracoscopic surgery, single-port thoracoscopic surgery can improve perioperative expression, shorten hospital stay, reduce serum tumor micrometastasis levels, improve immune metastasis mechanisms and reduce pain, which is of great significance to patients with non-small cell lung cancer. It is an effective, convenient, and safe surgical option that deserves wide clinical reference.

• Early stage
• Lung cancer
• Radiofrequency ablation
• Stereotactic radiosurgery
• Sublobar resection
• Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Segmentectomy has gained popularity in the latest years as a valid alternative to lobectomy. Initially reserved to patient unfit for lobar lung resection, this procedure is now offered also in selected patient with <2 cm peripheral lung cancer confined to an anatomic segment with no nodal involvement on preoperative evaluation. The introduction of screening with low-dose CT chest scan allowed the identification of lung cancer at early stages, making possible to schedule a more conservative lung surgery. A major improvement came also from minimally invasive surgery (MIS), reducing complication rate with comparable survival rates when compared to open surgery. However, due to long learning curve and uncomfortable instruments handling of video-assisted thoracoscopy, many surgeons still prefer to perform segmentectomies through a thoracotomy and thus increasing perioperative morbidity and leading to post-thoracotomy syndrome due to rib-spreading. Robotic assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) can avoid this throwback, combining the handling of open surgery with lesser invasiveness of thoracoscopy. Although literature has given strong evidences in favour of robotic lobectomies, data are still limited regarding segmentectomies performed with this technique. Moreover, no results are still available from the two ongoing randomized controlled trials comparing segmentectomy to lobectomy and so the latter represent the oncologically proper procedure for lung cancer along with lymph-node dissection. In this review we analyse the literature currently available on outcomes of lobar and sublobar anatomical resection performed by RATS, with a brief mention of the existing surgical techniques of port positioning and the costs of this procedure.

• Lung cancer
• minimally invasive surgery (MIS)
• robotic surgery
• segmentectomy

• lung cancer
• lymph node
• lymph node dissection
• minimally invasive surgery
• non-small cell lung cancer
• sublobar resection
• thoracoscopic surgery

In general, a 2-cm surgical margin is recommended for limited resection to obtain equivalent oncologic outcomes to lobectomy for lung cancer. This study aimed to examine the patterns of recurrence and prognostic factors for recurrence in patients with a close parenchymal resection margin.

From January 2009 to April 2017, 156 patients with stage I lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy with a close resection margin (<2 cm) were enrolled. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were assessed. In addition, predisposing factors for recurrence were evaluated.

The mean tumor size was 1.7±0.8 cm and the parenchymal resection margin was 1.1±0.6 cm. Recurrence developed in 17 (10.7%) of the 156 patients, and the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 88.9%. Distant metastasis (7.7%) was the predominant recurrence pattern. The isolated local recurrence rate was 1.9%. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, tumor size, mediastinal lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, and histologic type were significant predisposing factors for recurrence. However, parenchymal margin distance did not significantly affect the long-term prognosis.

Segmentectomy with a close resection margin for early-stage lung cancer in selected patients resulted in acceptable recurrence and survival. However, patients with tumors larger than 2 cm, squamous cell carcinoma histology, and insufficient mediastinal evaluation should be carefully followed up for recurrence.

• Lung neoplasms
• Recurrence
• Resection margin
• Segmentectomy

Thoracoscopic complex basilar segmentectomies are technically demanding and challenging. We review our experience to check whether this complexity can lead to specific surgical issues or increased post-operative morbidity.

Complex basilar segmentectomies were defined as the anatomical resection of at least one segment composing the basilar pyramid, excluding S⁶. Data of patients who had an intention-to-treat thoracoscopic complex basilar segmentectomy were retrospectively collected from 2007 to 2019: indications, preoperative assessment, clinical features, operative technical aspects and early post-operative outcome.

Sixty-three patients, 26 men (41%) and 37 women (59%) with a median age of 66 years and a median body mass index (BMI) of 26 kg/m2 were included. Interventions performed were mostly S⁹⁺¹⁰ (n=32) and S⁸ (n=12) segmentectomies. Forty-five planned operations (71%) were completed. Extension to a larger resection was necessary in 17 patients (27%) and 4 patients underwent conversion to open surgery (6%). Median operative time was 168 minutes with a median intraoperative bleeding of 30 mL. Complications occurred in 11 patients (17%). There was no mortality. Median length of pleural drainage was 2 days (range, 1–2 days) and median hospital stay 4 days.

The extension rate of complex basilar segmentectomy is higher than that of other sublobar resections but their post-operative morbidity is identical.

• Thoracoscopy
• basilar segmentectomy
• complex segmentectomy
• segmentectomy
• sublobar resection (SLR)

The aim of this study was to evaluate regional postoperative preserved pulmonary function (PPPF) and three‐dimensional (3D) volumetric changes according to the number of resected subsegments and investigate the factors that most affected pre‐/post PPPF.

Patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy (n = 73), and segmentectomy (n = 87) were eligible for inclusion in the study. They were classified according to the number of resected subsegments which ranged from 1 to 10. The percentage of pre‐/postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was used for comparison. Furthermore, lung volumetric changes were calculated using 3D computed tomography (CT) volumetry.

The percentage of pre‐/postoperative EFV1 between 4 and 5–7 and between 5–7 and 10 were significant (p = 0.03 and p < 0.01, respectively), but not between 1–2 to 4 (p = 0.99). The difference between volumetric changes in the left lower lobe of patients with a number of resected subsegments was significant (p < 0.01). On univariate and multivariate analyses, chronic inflammation was significant for decrease in recovery percentages. When the PPPF was compared among resected subsegments, it gradually decreased with an increase in the number of patients without a postoperative procrastination of inflammation (p < 0.01).

Segmentectomy is feasible and useful for PPPF. Even a relatively large‐volume resection procedure where 5–7 subsegments are resected can preserve pulmonary function. Chronic inflammation was statistically identified as a risk factor for postoperative preserved pulmonary function.

• forced expiratory volume
• left upper lobe
• lobectomy
• segmentectomy
• thoracoscopic surgery

• Bronchial isomerism
• Diagnosis
• Surgical resection

• GGO
• Non-small cell lung cancer
• Prognosis
• Surgical procedure
• Survival

• Metachronous lung cancer
• Stereotactic body radiotherapy
• Surgery

Whether prognosis differs between lung acinar predominant adenocarcinoma (ACN) and papillary predominant adenocarcinoma (PAP) patients remains controversial. Furthermore, the appropriate surgical plan for each subtype is undetermined.

Data of stage I ACN or PAP patients from 2004 to 2015 were retrospectively reviewed by SEER*Stat 8.3.5. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and lung cancer specific survival (LCSS).

1531 patients (PAP, 484; ACN, 1047) were included. ACN patients had better OS (P = .001) and LCSS (P = .003) than PAP patients. Among stage I ACN patients, lobectomy with mediastinal lymph node dissection (Lob) (P = .001) or segmentectomy (Seg) (P = .003) provided a better OS than wedge resection (Wed). And ACN patients who received Lob had a equivalent LCSS, compared to those who received Seg (P = .895). For patients with PAP in stage I, those who received Lob tended to have a better prognosis than that received Seg (HR of OS, 0.605, 95% CI: 0.263‐1.393; HR of LCSS, 0.541, 95% CI: 0.194‐1.504) or Wed (HR of OS, 0.735, 95% CI: 0.481‐1.123; HR of LCSS, 0.688, 95% CI: 0.402‐1.180).

Among patients with lung adenocarcinoma in stage I, those with ACN have a better OS and LCSS than that with PAP. For patients with stage I ACN, Seg and Lob, rather than Wed, seem to be an equivalent treatment choice; however, Seg is the prior option because it could preserve more lung function than Lob. For patients with PAP, Lob tends to be a better choice than Wed and Seg, although the prognostic difference between them is nonsignificant.

• acinar
• lung adenocarcinoma
• papillary
• surgical procedures
• survival