1
|
Li R. Should we adopt a "laparoscopy first" strategy? A comparison of 30-day outcomes between converted open from laparoscopic and planned open colectomy for volvulus. Updates Surg 2025:10.1007/s13304-025-02133-0. [PMID: 40025297 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-025-02133-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2025] [Indexed: 03/04/2025]
Abstract
While the majority of colectomy for volvulus is performed by an open approach, laparoscopy can be used as a potentially safer alternative. However, conversion to open is needed when the laparoscopic approach is unsuccessful. This study aimed to compare the 30-day outcomes of patients who had converted open from laparoscopy vs planned open colectomy for volvulus to assess a possible "laparoscopy first" strategy. In addition, this study identified risk factors associated with the conversion during laparoscopy. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted colectomy database from 2012 to 2022 was utilized. Patients with volvulus as the primary indication for laparoscopic and open colectomy were selected. Patients who had a conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery and planned open surgery were further identified. A 1:5 propensity-score matching was applied to converted open and planned open to match sex, race and ethnicity, age, baseline characteristics, preoperative preparation, and indication for surgery (if emergent). Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined. There were 1774 (22.10%) and 6254 (77.90%) patients who underwent laparoscopic and planned open colectomy for volvulus, respectively. From laparoscopy, 336 (18.94%) patients were converted to open surgery and 1,680 planned open cases were matched to the converted open cases. After propensity-score matching, patients underwent converted open and planned open had a comparable mortality rate (5.06% vs 3.99%, p = 0.37). However, patients who underwent converted open surgery had higher risks of renal complications (2.68% vs 0.60%, p < 0.01), bleeding requiring transfusion (9.82% vs 6.55%, p = 0.04), and wound complications (17.86% vs 12.26%, p = 0.01). Risk factors associated with conversion from laparoscopic to open colectomy included perforation (aOR = 4.767, p < 0.01), obstruction (aOR = 2.223, p < 0.01), sepsis 48 h before surgery (aOR = 2.952, p < 0.01), chronic kidneys disease (aOR = 1.602, p = 0.01) and preoperative infection (aOR = 1.489, p = 0.03). These identified risk factors demonstrated both strong discriminative (c-statistics = 0.713) and predictive (Brier score = 0.132) powers for open conversion. While laparoscopy for colonic volvulus may offer safer outcomes, a ubiquitous "laparoscopy first" strategy may be approached with caution. The increased risks of complications upon conversion to open surgery, particularly in patients with identified risk factors, suggest that careful patient selection may be crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renxi Li
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I St NW, Washington, D.C., 20052, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li R, Kartiko S. Evaluating Racial Disparities in 30-day Outcomes for African Americans Following Colectomy for Volvulus. Am Surg 2025; 91:266-272. [PMID: 39395014 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241292726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery is the definitive treatment for colonic volvulus despite initial decompression therapy. In general surgery, African Americans were found to have higher risks of mortality and morbidities. However, racial disparity in colectomy outcomes for volvulus among African Americans had not been explored. This study examined the 30-day outcomes for African Americans following colectomy for volvulus. METHODS The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted colectomy database from 2012 to 2022 was used. Only patients with volvulus as the primary indication for colectomy were selected. A 1:1 propensity score matching was applied to African Americans and Caucasians to match sex, age, baseline characteristics, preoperative preparation, indication for surgery (if emergent), and operative approaches. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were examined. RESULTS There were 1027 and 7451 African Americans and Caucasians who underwent colectomy for volvulus, respectively. All African Americans were 1:1 propensity-score matched to their Caucasian counterparts. African Americans and Caucasians had a comparable mortality rate (7.21% vs 7.89%, P = 0.62). While African Americans had a higher risk of pulmonary complications (16.85% vs 13.53%, P = 0.04), other surgical complications were all comparable between African Americans and Caucasians. However, African Americans had a longer time from admission to operation (2.70 ± 3.99 vs 2.17 ± 3.36 days, P < 0.01) and a longer length of stay (LOS; 12.81 ± 10.28 vs 10.50 ± 7.72 days, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION African Americans were found to have higher risks of pulmonary complications, delayed operation, and extended LOS. These disparities raise concerns and warrant further investigation into their underlying causes. Effective targeted interventions may be necessary to address these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renxi Li
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Susan Kartiko
- Department of Surgery, The George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Popazu C, Toma A, Mihalache D, Duca OM, Firescu D, Voicu DF. Unlocking the Potential of Cecostomies: A Valuable Lifesaving Procedure in Emergency Surgery for Colonic Obstructions. Life (Basel) 2025; 15:101. [PMID: 39860041 PMCID: PMC11767128 DOI: 10.3390/life15010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2024] [Revised: 12/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonic obstructions present a serious medical emergency that requires prompt surgical intervention to prevent life-threatening complications. Cecostomy, a procedure involving the creation of an opening in the cecum to decompress the colon, serves as one surgical approach for managing these obstructions. The aim of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness and benefits of cecostomies in emergency surgical settings, with a focus on recent clinical studies and case reports. Cecostomy is highlighted as a bridge procedure in cases such as obstructive carcinomas, providing data on success rates, relative survival, and clinical effectiveness. The importance of the patient's condition and surgeon expertise in selecting cecostomy as a procedure is emphasized. Further comparative research is suggested to optimize the selection criteria, providing a strong, clinically oriented conclusion. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify studies and case reports focusing on the application of cecostomies in cases of acute colonic obstruction. Articles were selected based on their relevance to emergency surgery, the effectiveness of cecostomies, and patient outcomes in various clinical scenarios, including obstructive carcinomas and colonic pseudo-obstructions. RESULTS The analysis reveals that cecostomies provide rapid decompression and effective relief from colonic obstruction, particularly when immediate intervention is needed to prevent bowel perforation or ischemia. In several cases, cecostomies act as a bridge to more definitive surgical treatments, such as resection and anastomosis, and are associated with reduced morbidity and mortality. The selection of cecostomy as a preferred procedure depends on the patient's condition, location of the obstruction, and surgeon expertise. CONCLUSIONS Cecostomies play a crucial role in the emergency management of colonic obstructions, offering a viable and sometimes lifesaving alternative for rapid decompression. Understanding the indications and appropriate use of cecostomies can enhance patient outcomes and provide surgeons with effective strategies for managing acute colonic obstructions. Further research is warranted to refine selection criteria and to compare outcomes between cecostomies and other decompressive techniques in emergency settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Popazu
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
- Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Brăila, 810325 Brăila, Romania
| | - Alexandra Toma
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
- Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Brăila, 810325 Brăila, Romania
| | - Daniela Mihalache
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
- Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Brăila, 810325 Brăila, Romania
| | - Oana-Monica Duca
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
- Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Brăila, 810325 Brăila, Romania
| | - Dorel Firescu
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
| | - Dragoș F. Voicu
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Dunărea de Jos” University of Galați, 800201 Galați, Romania
- Emergency Clinical County Hospital of Brăila, 810325 Brăila, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang HY, Wang ZJ, Han JG. Impact of self-expanding metal stents on long-term survival outcomes as a bridge to surgery in patients with colon cancer obstruction: Current state and future prospects. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:1312-1327. [PMID: 39188169 DOI: 10.1111/den.14905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
Since self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) were first introduced in acute colon cancer obstruction, the increased rate of primary anastomosis and improved quality of life following SEMS placement have been clearly shown. However, it was demonstrated that SEMS are associated with higher recurrence rates. Although several trials have shown that overall and disease-free survival in patients following SEMS placement is similar with patients undergoing emergency surgery, obstruction and a high incidence of recurrence imposed many concerns. The optimal time interval from SEMS to surgery is still a matter of debate. Some studies have recommended a time interval of ~2 weeks between SEMS insertion and elective surgery. A prolonged interval of time from SEMS insertion to elective surgery and the administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been proposed. SEMS-NAC might have advantages for improving the surgical and long-term survival outcomes of patients with acute colon cancer obstruction, which is an optional approach in the management of acute colon cancer obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-Yu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen-Jun Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Gang Han
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Marzano M, Prosperi P, Grazi GL, Cianchi F, Talamucci L, Bisogni D, Bencini L, Mastronardi M, Guagni T, Falcone A, Martellucci J, Bergamini C, Giordano A. Upfront Surgery vs. Endoscopic Stenting Bridge to Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Obstructive Left Colon Cancer: Analysis of Surgical and Oncological Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3895. [PMID: 39682083 PMCID: PMC11640554 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16233895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 11/20/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Left colon cancer obstruction treatment is a debated topic in the literature. Stent placement is effective as a bridge-to-surgery strategy, but there are some concerns about the oncological safety for the reported higher risk of local and peritoneal recurrence. This study aims to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of patients treated with stent followed by elective surgery with those treated with primary resection. METHODS This is a retrospective observational study. We included patients of both sexes, ≥18 years old, with a histological diagnosis of intestinal adenocarcinoma, and admitted to our hospital for left colon cancer obstruction demonstrated by CT scan without metastasis or perforation. They were treated through primary resection (PR) or stent placement followed by elective surgery (SR). The two groups were compared for general characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncological outcomes (metastasis and local recurrence) at 30 days, 90 days, 1 year, and 3 years. Post-operative quality of life (QoL) was also investigated. RESULTS The SR group showed a shorter hospital stay, a lower post-operative mortality, a lower stoma rate at 1 year, and a higher number of minimally invasive procedures. Oncological outcomes were not different compared to the PR group. The SR group demonstrated better QoL in two out of six items on the EQ-5D-5L test. CONCLUSIONS Stent placement as a bridge-to-surgery strategy is feasible and provides better surgical outcomes in terms of post-operative complications, surgical approach, stoma rate, and QoL. Oncological outcomes were not reported differently, but further studies should be conducted to better evaluate this aspect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mauro Marzano
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Paolo Prosperi
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Gian Luca Grazi
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Fabio Cianchi
- Digestive System Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Luca Talamucci
- Advanced Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (L.T.); (D.B.)
| | - Damiano Bisogni
- Advanced Interventional Endoscopy Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy; (L.T.); (D.B.)
| | - Lapo Bencini
- General Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Manuela Mastronardi
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, General Surgery Unit, University Hospital of Trieste, Strada di Fiume 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy
| | - Tommaso Guagni
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Agostino Falcone
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Jacopo Martellucci
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Carlo Bergamini
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| | - Alessio Giordano
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134 Florence, Italy (P.P.); (J.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen KA, Kapadia MR. Large Bowel Obstruction: Etiologies, Diagnosis, and Management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:376-380. [PMID: 39399137 PMCID: PMC11466520 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/15/2024]
Abstract
Large bowel obstructions (LBOs) often require urgent surgical intervention. Diagnosis relies on astute history and physical examination, as well as imaging with computed tomography (CT) scan for stable patients. Because of the high mortality associated with colonic perforation in patients with LBOs, decisive surgical decision-making is needed for optimal outcomes. This review seeks to provide an overview of the etiologies of LBO, diagnosis, and general management principles, as well as specific management for the most common etiologies, including colorectal cancer and strictures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin A. Chen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Muneera R. Kapadia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nozawa H, Sakamoto A, Murono K, Sasaki K, Emoto S, Ishihara S. Feasibility and outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with preexisting colostomy. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:102. [PMID: 39138696 PMCID: PMC11322400 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02980-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diverting colostomy followed by neoadjuvant treatment is a treatment of choice for obstructive rectal cancer. Such patients may be treated via a robotic approach with several advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conversely, the existing stoma may interfere with the optimal trocar position and thus affect the quality of robotic surgery. Moreover, the console surgeon does not face the patient, which may endanger the stoma. METHODS Patients with rectal cancer who underwent sphincter-preserving surgery were retrospectively investigated using a robotic platform after neoadjuvant treatment at our hospital. Based on pretreatment stoma creation, patients were divided into the NS (those without a stoma) and S groups (patients with a stoma). Baseline characteristics, types of neoadjuvant treatment, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative anorectal manometric data, and survival were compared between the groups. RESULTS The NS and S groups comprised 65 and 9 patients, respectively. Conversion to laparotomy was required in three patients in the NS group. The S group required a longer console time than the NS group (median: 367 vs. 253 min, respectively, p = 0.038); however, no difference was observed in the total operative time (p = 0.15) and blood loss (p = 0.70). Postoperative complication rates, anorectal function, and oncological outcomes were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS Although console time was longer in patients with a stoma, robotic surgery could be performed safely like in those without a stoma after neoadjuvant treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - A Sakamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - K Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - K Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - S Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - S Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li R. Dependent functional status is an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality and morbidities following colectomy for volvulus: An ACS-NSQIP study from the United States. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2024; 48:102391. [PMID: 38834098 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2024.102391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colonic volvulus is a common cause of bowel obstructions and surgery is the definitive treatment. Functional status is often associated with adverse postoperative outcomes but its effect on colectomy for volvulus remained under-explored. This study sought to analyze the effect of functional status on the 30-day outcomes of colectomy for volvulus. MATERIALS AND METHOD National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) targeted colectomy database from 2012 to 2022 was utilized. Only patients with volvulus as the primary indication for colectomy were included. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared between patients with dependent functional status (DFS) and independent functional status (IFS), adjusted for demographics, baseline characteristics, preoperative preparation, indication for surgery, and operative approaches by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS There were 1,476 patients with DFS (945 partially DFS and 531 fully DFS) and 8,824 (85.67 %) IFS patients who underwent colectomy for volvulus. After multivariable analysis, DFS patients had higher risks of mortality (aOR=1.671, 95 CI=1.37-2.038, p < 0.01), pulmonary complications (aOR=2.166, 95 CI=1.85-2.536, p < 0.01), sepsis (aOR=1.31, 95 CI=1.107-1.551, p < 0.01), prolonged postoperative nothing by mouth (NPO) or nasogastric tube (NGT) use (aOR=1.436, 95 CI=1.269-1.626, p < 0.01), discharge not to home (aOR=3.774, 95 CI=3.23-4.411, p < 0.01), and 30-day readmission (aOR=1.196, 95 CI=1.007-1.42, p = 0.04). Moreover, DFS patients had a longer length of stay (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION DFS was identified as an independent risk factor for increased mortality and complications after colectomy for volvulus. Given the substantial overlap between DFS patients and those who have colonic volvulus, these insights can contribute to preoperative risk assessments and postoperative care in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renxi Li
- The George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, 2300 I St NW, Washington, DC 20052, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kato H, Kawai K, Nakano D, Dejima A, Ise I, Natsume S, Takao M, Shibata S, Iizuka T, Akimoto T, Tsukada Y, Ito M. Does Colorectal Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery for Obstructive Colorectal Cancer Increase Perineural Invasion? J Anus Rectum Colon 2024; 8:195-203. [PMID: 39086875 PMCID: PMC11286373 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2023-057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To clarify whether self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC) increases perineural invasion (PNI), thereby worsening the prognosis. Methods In total, 1022 patients with pathological T3 or T4 colon or rectosigmoid cancer who underwent resection were retrospectively reviewed. The study patients were divided into a no obstruction group (n=693), obstruction without stent group (n=251), and obstruction with stent group (n=78), and factors demonstrating an independent association with PNI, the difference in PNI incidence and severity between groups, and the association between PNI and the duration from SEMS placement to surgery were investigated. Survival analysis was performed for each group. Results On multivariate analysis, SEMS placement (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.08) was independently associated with PNI whereas SEMS placement was not. PNI occurred in 39%, 45%, and 68% of the no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. In the obstruction with stent group, the proportion of PNI was not associated with the duration from SEMS placement to surgery. Extramural PNI, an advanced form of PNI, demonstrated no increase with increasing interval. The five-year OS was 86.3%, 76.7%, and 73.1% in no obstruction, obstruction without stent, and obstruction with stent group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, obstruction was an independent risk factor of decreased OS (HR: 1.57) whereas SEMS placement was not. Conclusions The prognosis was comparable between patients with SEMS placement and those with an obstruction who did not undergo SEMS placement, thus demonstrating that SEMS is a viable, therapeutic option for BTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Kato
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazushige Kawai
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Nakano
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Dejima
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichiro Ise
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Natsume
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Misato Takao
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satomi Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiro Iizuka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Course of Advanced Clinical Research of Cancer, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle Therapy, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Tsukada
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Keogh C, Moore J, Cossio D, Smith N, Clark DA. Obstructing colorectal cancer: a population-based review of colonic stenting in Queensland, Australia. Ann Coloproctol 2024; 40:268-275. [PMID: 38946096 PMCID: PMC11362761 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2023.00640.0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 10/06/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Stenting is a useful treatment option for malignant colonic obstruction, but its role remains unclear. This study was designed to establish how stents have been used in Queensland, Australia, and to review outcomes. METHODS Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Queensland from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2014, who underwent colonic stent insertion were reviewed. Primary outcomes of 5-year survival, 30-day mortality, and overall length of survival were calculated. The secondary outcomes included patient and tumor factors, and stoma rates. RESULTS In total, 319 patients were included, and distant metastases were identified in 183 patients (57.4%). The 30-day mortality rate was 6.6% (n=21), and the 5-year survival was 11.9% (n=38). Median survival was 11 months (interquartile range, 4-27 months). A further operation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.19; P<0.001) and chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (HR, 0.718; P=0.046) reduced the risk of 5-year mortality. The presence of distant metastases (HR, 2.052; P<0.001) and a comorbidity score of 3 or more (HR, 1.572; P=0.20) increased mortality. Surgery was associated with a reduced risk of mortality even in patients with metastatic disease (HR, 0.14; P<0.001). Twenty-two patients (6.9%) ended the study period with a stoma. CONCLUSION Colorectal stenting was used in Queensland in several diverse scenarios, in both localized and metastatic disease. Surgery had a survival advantage, even in patients with metastatic disease. There was no survival difference according to whether patients were socioeconomically disadvantaged, diagnosed in a major city or not, or treated at private or public hospitals. Stenting proved a valid treatment option with low stoma rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cian Keogh
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Julie Moore
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Danica Cossio
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
| | - Nick Smith
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - David A. Clark
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Cancer Alliance Queensland, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ogunleye O, Abdelhafez AH, Matta E, Kramer L. Retrorectal Hernia: A Rare Cause of Constipation Diagnosed on Magnetic Resonance (MR) Defecography. Cureus 2024; 16:e58848. [PMID: 38784319 PMCID: PMC11112525 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Retrorectal herniation of the sigmoid colon is a rare condition characterized by the protrusion of a segment of the colon into the pre-sacral space and posterior to the rectum. This herniation occurs through a defect in the peritoneum, which may have developed secondary to congenital mechanisms, surgery, trauma, or inflammatory processes. Here, a case of retrorectal herniation of the sigmoid colon in an elderly female patient presenting with constipation is reported, with a review of the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olanrewaju Ogunleye
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Abeer H Abdelhafez
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Eduardo Matta
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| | - Larry Kramer
- Department of Radiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jimba M, Enomoto T, Saida Y. Four Cases of Proximal Release-Type Colon Stents for Obstructive Rectal Cancer. Cureus 2024; 16:e59362. [PMID: 38694633 PMCID: PMC11061818 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant colonic obstruction can cause necrosis, bacterial translocation, electrolytic imbalance, and death; therefore, immediate decompression should be performed. Self-expandable metallic colonic stents are an established treatment for the decompression of malignant colonic obstructions. The use of stents that open from the distal side, which have been commonly used until now, requires caution because placing a stent on the dentate line can cause severe pain, and there is a possibility of cutting the stent during rectal resection of the distal side of the tumor. Therefore, we designed a new proximal-release-type colorectal stent for use in our hospital; it is 22 mm in diameter and 70 mm in length, which was placed using the over-the-wire method with a 16 Fr delivery system. We have encountered four cases in which it was appropriate as a bridge to surgical treatment. None of the patients experienced complications, such as bleeding, pain, or other incidents, after stent placement. Additionally, the stents were not affected by the surgical dissection of the rectum on the anorectal side of the tumor. Herein, we presented the four aforementioned cases and discussed the stenting techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Jimba
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Toshiyuki Enomoto
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN
| | - Yoshihisa Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, JPN
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ha GW, Lee MR. Short-term and long-term oncologic outcomes of self-expandable metallic stent compared with tube decompression for obstructive colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Treat Res 2024; 106:93-105. [PMID: 38318094 PMCID: PMC10838655 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.106.2.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Patients with obstructive colorectal cancer managed by emergency surgery show high morbidity, mortality, and stoma formation rates. Decompression modalities, including the self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) and tube drainage (TD), have been used to improve surgical outcomes. However, there have been limited studies comparing the 2 modalities. We performed a meta-analysis on short- and long-term outcomes between SEMS and TD. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Data were pooled, and the overall effect size was calculated using random effect models. Outcome measures were perioperative short-term and 3-year survival outcomes. Results We included 20 nonrandomized studies that examined 2,047 patients in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed SEMS had better short-term outcomes in clinical success rate, decompression-related complications, laparoscopic surgery rate, stoma formation rate, and postoperative complication rate with a relative risk (RR) of 0.36 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.54; I2 = 20%), 0.32 (95% CI, 0.20-0.50; I2 = 0%), 0.47 (95% CI, 0.34-0.66; I2 = 87%), 0.34 (95% CI, 0.24-0.49; I2 = 52%), and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.54-0.89, I2 = 28%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups in 3-year overall survival (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.77-1.27; I2 = 0%). Conclusion Although the long-term oncologic impact of SEMS is still unclear compared with TD, the results of this meta-analysis may suggest that SEMS insertion can be performed more successfully and safely and may have benefits for short-term perioperative outcomes compared with TD. Further studies are warranted to provide more definitive survival results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gi Won Ha
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| | - Min Ro Lee
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giordano A, Podda M, Montori G, Botteri E, Fugazzola P, Ortenzi M, Guerrieri M, Vettoretto N, Agresta F, Sartori A, Bergamini C, Martellucci J, Guariniello A, Fransvea P, Azzinnaro A, Scatizzi M, Catena F, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Sapienza P, Mingoli A, Prosperi P. Colonic Resection, Stoma, or Self-expanding Metal Stents for Obstructive Left Colon Cancer: the CROSCO-1 study protocol. Minerva Surg 2024; 79:7-14. [PMID: 37705392 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.23.09969-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. There are several causes of a mechanical left bowel obstructive but CRC accounts for approximately 50% of cases and in 10-30% of whom it is the presenting syndrome. In most cases, the left colon is involved. At present, the range of therapeutic alternatives in the management of obstructive left CRC in emergency conditions (primary resection vs. staged resection with applied self-expanding metallic stents) is broad, whereas internationally validated clinical recommendations in each condition are still lacking. This enormous variability affects the scientific evidence on both the immediate and long-term surgical and oncological outcomes. METHODS CROSCO-1 (Colonic Resection, Stoma or Self-expanding Metal Stents for Obstructive Left Colon Cancer) study is a national, multi-center, prospective observational study intending to compare the clinical results of all these therapeutic regimens in a cohort of patients treated for obstructive left-sided CRC. RESULTS The primary aim of the CROSCO-1 study is the 1-year stoma rate of patients undergoing primary emergency surgical resection (Hartmann procedure or primary resection and anastomosis) compared with patients undergoing staged resection. Secondary outcomes are 30-day and 90-day major morbidity and mortality, 1-year quality of life and the timing of chemotherapy initiation in the two groups. Future CROSCO studies will follow in which, instead, we will evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of the two treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS The results of a large prospective cohort study which will analyze what really happens in the common clinical practice of managing patients with obstructive left CRC will have the aim of understanding which is the best strategy in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. Indeed, the CROSCO-1 study will analyze the early surgical outcomes for patients with obstructed left CRC. Future CROSCO studies will follow in which, instead, we will evaluate the long-term oncological outcomes of the two treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Giordano
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | - Mauro Podda
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Giulia Montori
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Emanuele Botteri
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- Department of General Surgery, Polytechnical University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mario Guerrieri
- Department of General Surgery, Polytechnical University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Nereo Vettoretto
- General Surgery Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Montichiari, Brescia, Italy
| | - Ferdinando Agresta
- Department of General Surgery, ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, Vittorio Veneto, Treviso, Italy
| | - Alberto Sartori
- Department of General Surgery, Montebelluna Hospital, Montebelluna, Treviso, Italy
| | - Carlo Bergamini
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Jacopo Martellucci
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Anna Guariniello
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fransvea
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma Department, IRCCS A. Gemelli University Polyclinic Foundation, Sacred Heart Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Scatizzi
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Santa Maria Annunziata and Serristori Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Paolo Sapienza
- Emergency Department, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Mingoli
- Emergency Department, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Prosperi
- Emergency Surgery Unit, Emergency Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huynh I, Lim WM, Chen MZ, Sundaramurthy SR, Tay YK. A Case Report on a Hybrid Approach to Managing Acute Large Bowel Obstruction Secondary to Spigelian Hernia. Cureus 2024; 16:e53869. [PMID: 38465056 PMCID: PMC10924684 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Spigelian hernias are an uncommon type of primary ventral hernia and are defined as a defect in the Spigelian aponeurosis (fascia). Herein, we present an uncommon case of Spigelian hernia to highlight the potential complications of these hernias and the need for surgical management. This is a case report of an 86-year-old gentleman presenting post-fall with an acute rib fracture and an incidental Spigelian hernia seen on a CT trauma pan scan. The Spigelian hernia surgical treatment was planned for elective management due to the anesthetic risks associated with an elderly patient and acute rib fractures. Ultimately, the patient developed a large bowel obstruction secondary to the Spigelian hernia and required emergency operative management to relieve the obstruction. The patient had an uncomplicated recovery following his emergency surgery. This case report highlights the importance of assessing anesthetic risks versus surgical risks when it comes to surgical planning. Clinicians should recognize occult hernias and continue ongoing clinical reviews with a high index of suspicion, as symptoms of Spigelian hernia obstruction might be non-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Huynh
- General Surgery and Acute Surgery Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS
| | - Wei Mou Lim
- Colorectal Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, AUS
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Amo‐Tachie S, Ocansey FK, Yeboah AD. Crohn's disease: An enigmatic variant with gastritis and ileal obstruction. Clin Case Rep 2024; 12:e8371. [PMID: 38161629 PMCID: PMC10753134 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.8371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
There are multiple atypical manifestations of Crohn's disease, which sometimes delay diagnosis or even more often result in complete misdiagnosis, especially in poorly equipped facilities. This is the case of an elderly woman with Crohn's disease who presented with gastritis and bowel obstruction. She had hitherto been wrongly managed for peptic ulcer disease and functional constipation based mainly on her symptoms. Her diagnosis was made only after years of failed symptomatic management. This case aims to highlight the uncommon and easily misdiagnosed gastroduodenal presentation of Crohn's disease, as well as clinical clues to correctly diagnosing the condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Amo‐Tachie
- Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsUniversity of Ghana Medical School, University of GhanaAccraGhana
- Department of Internal MedicineCape Coast Teaching HospitalCape CoastGhana
| | | | - Abena Durowaa Yeboah
- Department of Medicine and TherapeuticsUniversity of Ghana Medical School, University of GhanaAccraGhana
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Williams B, Gupta A, Koller SD, Starr TJ, Star MJH, Shaw DD, Hakim AH, Leinicke J, Visenio M, Perrone KH, Torgerson ZH, Person AD, Ternent CA, Chen KA, Kapadia MR, Keller DS, Elnagar J, Okonkwo A, Gagliano RA, Clark CE, Arcomano N, Abcarian AM, Beaty JS. Emergency Colon and Rectal Surgery, What Every Surgeon Needs to Know. Curr Probl Surg 2024; 61:101427. [PMID: 38161059 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2023.101427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Williams
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Abhinav Gupta
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Sarah D Koller
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University Southern California, Los Angelos, CA
| | - Tanya Jt Starr
- Health Corporation of America, Midwest Division, Kansas City, KS
| | | | - Darcy D Shaw
- Health Corporation of America, Midwest Division, Kansas City, KS
| | - Ali H Hakim
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Jennifer Leinicke
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Michael Visenio
- Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Kenneth H Perrone
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Austin D Person
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | - Charles A Ternent
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Creighton University, Omaha, NE
| | - Kevin A Chen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Muneera R Kapadia
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Deborah S Keller
- Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA; Marks Colorectal Surgical Associates, Wynnewood, PA
| | - Jaafar Elnagar
- Department of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, PA
| | | | | | | | - Nicolas Arcomano
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Ariane M Abcarian
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, IL; Cook County Health, Chicago, IL
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gu J, Deng S, Jiang Z, Mao F, Xue Y, Qin L, Shi J, Yang J, Li H, Yu J, Liu K, Wu K, Cao Y, Cai K. Modified Naples prognostic score for evaluating the prognosis of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:941. [PMID: 37798689 PMCID: PMC10557152 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11435-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory, immune, and nutritional status are key factors in obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). This study aims to investigate the value of modified Naples prognostic score (M-NPS) in evaluating OCRC prognosis. METHODS A total of 196 OCRC patients were retrospectively analyzed to construct M-NPS based on serum albumin (ALB), total cholesterol (CHOL), neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and lymphocyte:monocyte ratio (LMR), and then they were divided into three groups. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of OCRC patients. RESULTS Patients with high M-NPS had worse OS and DFS (P = 0.0001, P = 0.0011). Multivariate COX analysis showed that M-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients. Patients in the M-NPS 2 group had significantly worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.930 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.217-10.964), P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 3.508 (95% CI, 1.691-7.277), P < 0.001) than those in the 0 group. CONCLUSION M-NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OCRC patients; it might provide a potential reference for immunonutritional intervention in patients with obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junnan Gu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Shenghe Deng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Zhenxing Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Fuwei Mao
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Yifan Xue
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Le Qin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Jianguo Shi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Jia Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Huili Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Jie Yu
- Department of Colorectal Anal Surgery, Jingzhou Central Hospital, The Second Clinical Medical College, Yangtze University, No. 60 Jingzhong Road, Jingzhou, 434020, Hubei Province, China
| | - Ke Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Ke Wu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China
| | - Yinghao Cao
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.
| | - Kailin Cai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Li JW, Ngu JCY, Lim KR, Tay SW, Jiang B, Wijaya R, Yusof S, Ong CJ, Kwek ABE, Ang TL. Colonic stenting in acute malignant large bowel obstruction: audit of efficacy and safety in a Singapore tertiary referral centre. Singapore Med J 2023; 64:603-608. [PMID: 34600451 PMCID: PMC10645007 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2021127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Acute malignant large bowel obstruction (MBO) occurs in 8%-15% of colorectal cancer patients. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) have progressed from a palliative modality to use as bridge to surgery (BTS). We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of SEMS for MBO in our institution. Methods The data of patients undergoing SEMS insertion for MBO were reviewed. Technical success was defined as successful SEMS deployment across tumour without complications. Clinical success was defined as colonic decompression without requiring further surgical intervention. Rates of complications, median time to surgery, types of surgery and rates of recurrence were studied. Results Seventy-nine patients underwent emergent SEMS placement from September 2013 to February 2020. Their mean age was 68.8 ± 13.8 years and 43 (54%) patients were male. Mean tumour length was 4.2 cm ± 2.2 cm; 89.9% of malignant strictures were located distal to the splenic flexure. Technical and clinical success was 94.9% and 98.7%, respectively. Perforation occurred in 5.1% of patients, with none having stent migration or bleeding. Fifty (63.3%) patients underwent SEMS insertion as BTS. Median time to surgery was 20 (range 6-57) days. Most (82%) patients underwent minimally invasive surgery. Primary anastomosis rate was 98%. Thirty-nine patients had follow-up beyond 1-year posttreatment (median 34 months). Local recurrence and distant metastasis were observed in 4 (10.3%) and 5 (12.8%) patients, respectively. Conclusion Insertion of SEMS for acute MBO has high success rates and a good safety profile. Most patients in this audit underwent minimally invasive surgery and primary anastomosis after successful BTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Weiquan Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - James Chi-Yong Ngu
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Kok Ren Lim
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Shu Wen Tay
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Bochao Jiang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Ramesh Wijaya
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Sulaiman Yusof
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Calvin Jianming Ong
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Andrew Boon Eu Kwek
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| | - Tiing Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore Health Services, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Yamane K, Umino Y, Nagami T, Tarumoto K, Hattori K, Maemoto R, Iwasaki J, Kanazawa A. Comparison of Oncological and Perioperative Outcomes Between Self-Expanding Metal Stents and Decompression Tubes for Stages II and III Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study. World J Surg 2023; 47:2279-2286. [PMID: 37184666 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07044-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A bridge to surgery (BTS) using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) is becoming the primary treatment for obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). In Japan, intestinal decompression was usually performed using decompression tubes (DTs). However, few reports have compared the outcomes of SEMS and DTs as BTS. Therefore, we compared the treatment outcomes of SEMS and DTs for OCRC. METHODS Data of 80 patients who underwent radical resection after endoscopic decompression for stage II or III OCRC between 2007 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received SEMS (n = 53) or DTs (n = 27). RESULTS The clinical success rate of decompression was 96.2% and 88.9% in the SEMS and DT groups, respectively. Additionally, 96.2% of patients who received SEMS were able to resume their routine diet without stricture symptoms. The rate of stoma construction and incidence of postoperative complications were lower in the SEMS group (p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 71.9% and 51.2% in the SEMS and DT groups, respectively, which were not significantly different (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION BTS using SEMS might be an adequate treatment for stage II or III OCRC regardless of tumor location owing to the comparable oncological outcomes with DT and low perioperative complication rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Yamane
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan.
| | - Yosuke Umino
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Tadashi Nagami
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Koji Tarumoto
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Kuniaki Hattori
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Ryo Maemoto
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Junji Iwasaki
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| | - Akiyoshi Kanazawa
- Department of Surgery, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, 4-1-1 Himebara, Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Yokoyama Y, Takahashi G, Yoshida H. Long-term outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent and transanal decompression tube for malignant large bowel obstruction: A multicenter retrospective study and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2023; 7:583-593. [PMID: 37416739 PMCID: PMC10319605 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare the oncological outcomes between self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery and transanal decompression tube (TDT) placement for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO). METHODS A total of 287 MLBO patients who underwent SEMS (n = 137) or TDT placement (n = 150) were enrolled in this multicenter retrospective study. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between the two groups were compared. A meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate odd ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥II and ≥III occurred frequently in the TDT group compared with the SEMS group (P = 0.002 and 0.005, respectively). The 3-y OS in the overall cohort and 3-y DFS in the pathological stage II/III cohort in the SEMS and TDT groups were 68.6% and 71.4%, and 71.0% and 72.6%, respectively. The survival differences were not significantly different in the OS and DFS analyses (P = 0.819 and P = 0.892, respectively). A meta-analysis of nine studies (including our cohort data) demonstrated no significant difference between the SEMS and TDT groups for 3-y OS and DFS (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.57-1.62, P = 0.89 and OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.46-1.04, P = 0.07, respectively). CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that SEMS placement had no inferiority regarding long-term outcomes, including OS and DFS, compared with TDT placement. Considering the short-term benefits of SEMS placement, this could be a preferable preoperative decompression method for MLBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
- Department of SurgeryNippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh HospitalChibaJapan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Digestive SurgeryNippon Medical School Musashikosugi HospitalKawasakiKanagawaJapan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic SurgeryNippon Medical SchoolTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McKechnie T, Springer JE, Cloutier Z, Archer V, Alavi K, Doumouras A, Hong D, Eskicioglu C. Management of left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions with curative intent: a network meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:4159-4178. [PMID: 36869265 PMCID: PMC9984133 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09929-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several management options exist for colonic decompression in the setting of malignant large bowel obstruction, including oncologic resection, surgical diversion, and SEMS as a bridge-to-surgery. Consensus has yet to be reached on optimal treatment pathways. The aim of the present study was to perform a network meta-analysis comparing short-term postoperative morbidity and long-term oncologic outcomes between oncologic resection, surgical diversion, and self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) in left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction with curative intent. METHODS Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL were systematically searched. Articles were included if they compared two or more of the following in patients presenting with curative left-sided malignant colorectal obstruction: (1) emergent oncologic resection; (2) surgical diversion; and/or (3) SEMS. The primary outcome was overall 90-day postoperative morbidity. Pairwise meta-analyses were performed with inverse variance random effects. Random-effect Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS From 1277 citations, 53 studies with 9493 patients undergoing urgent oncologic resection, 1273 patients undergoing surgical diversion, and 2548 patients undergoing SEMS were included. Network meta-analysis demonstrated a significant improvement in 90-day postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing SEMS compared to urgent oncologic resection (OR0.34, 95%CrI0.01-0.98). Insufficient RCT data pertaining to overall survival (OS) precluded network meta-analysis. Pairwise meta-analysis demonstrated decreased five-year OS for patients undergoing urgent oncologic resection compared to surgical diversion (OR0.44, 95%CI0.28-0.71, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Bridge-to-surgery interventions may offer short- and long-term benefits compared to urgent oncologic resection for malignant colorectal obstruction and should be increasingly considered in this patient population. Further prospective study comparing surgical diversion and SEMS is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler McKechnie
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Jeremy E Springer
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Zacharie Cloutier
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Victoria Archer
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
| | - Karim Alavi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Aristithes Doumouras
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Dennis Hong
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Cagla Eskicioglu
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Avenue East Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, L8N 4A6, Canada.
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Joseph Healthcare, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Tian BWCA, Vigutto G, Tan E, van Goor H, Bendinelli C, Abu-Zidan F, Ivatury R, Sakakushev B, Di Carlo I, Sganga G, Maier RV, Coimbra R, Leppäniemi A, Litvin A, Damaskos D, Broek RT, Biffl W, Di Saverio S, De Simone B, Ceresoli M, Picetti E, Galante J, Tebala GD, Beka SG, Bonavina L, Cui Y, Khan J, Cicuttin E, Amico F, Kenji I, Hecker A, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Moore EE, Kluger Y, Testini M, Weber D, Agnoletti V, Angelis ND, Coccolini F, Sall I, Catena F. WSES consensus guidelines on sigmoid volvulus management. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:34. [PMID: 37189134 PMCID: PMC10186802 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00502-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Sigmoid volvulus is a common surgical emergency, especially in elderly patients. Patients can present with a wide range of clinical states: from asymptomatic, to frank peritonitis secondary to colonic perforation. These patients generally need urgent treatment, be it endoscopic decompression of the colon or an upfront colectomy. The World Society of Emergency Surgery united a worldwide group of international experts to review the current evidence and propose a consensus guidelines on the management of sigmoid volvulus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gabriele Vigutto
- Acute Care Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery and Trauma, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cino Bendinelli
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- The Research Office, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
| | - Rao Ivatury
- Professor Emeritus Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Boris Sakakushev
- Research Institute at Medical University Plovdiv, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies "GF Ingrassia", Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ronald V Maier
- Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Raul Coimbra
- Division of Trauma, Surgical Critical Care, Burns, and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, UCSD Health System - Hillcrest Campus, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Abdominal Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgery, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia
| | - Dimitrios Damaskos
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Richard Ten Broek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Walter Biffl
- Queen's Medical Center, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Trauma and General Surgeon Royal Perth Hospital, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Guastalla Hospital, AUSL-IRCCS Reggio, Emilia, Italy
| | - Marco Ceresoli
- Emergency and General Surgery Department, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy
| | - Joseph Galante
- Trauma Department, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni D Tebala
- Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, S. Maria Hospital Trust, Terni, Italy
| | - Solomon Gurmu Beka
- School of Medicine and Health Science, University of Otago, Wellington Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Division of General Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Jim Khan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Alexandra Hospital, University of Portsmouth, Southwick Hill Road, Cosham, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesco Amico
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Inaba Kenji
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General Surgery Department, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Ernest E Moore
- Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Division of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Mario Testini
- Academic Unit of General Surgery "V. Bonomo", Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of General Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, AUSL Romagna, M. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Nicola De' Angelis
- Department of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Federico Coccolini
- General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal.
| | - Fausto Catena
- Acute Care Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery and Trauma, Maurizio Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Suzuki H, Tsujinaka S, Sato Y, Miura T, Shibata C. Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2023; 14:1-12. [PMID: 36699626 PMCID: PMC9850666 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonic stenting has had a significant positive impact on the management of obstructive left-sided colon cancer (OLCC) in terms of both palliative treatment and bridge-to-surgery (BTS). Notably, many studies have convincingly demonstrated the effectiveness of stenting as a BTS, resulting in improvements in short-term outcomes and quality of life, safety, and efficacy in subsequent curative surgery, and increased cost-effectiveness, whereas the safety of chemotherapy after stenting and the long-term outcomes of stenting as a BTS are controversial. Several studies have suggested an increased risk of perforation in patients receiving bevacizumab chemotherapy after colonic stenting. In addition, several pathological analyses have suggested a negative oncological impact of colonic stenting. In contrast, many recent studies have demonstrated that colonic stenting for OLCC does not negatively impact the safety of chemotherapy or long-term oncological outcomes. The updated version of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines released in 2020 included colonic stenting as a BTS for OLCC as a recommended treatment. It should be noted that the experience of endoscopists is involved in determining technical and clinical success rates and possibly oncological outcomes. This review discusses the positive and negative impacts of colonic stenting on OLCC treatment, particularly in terms of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideyuki Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Shingo Tsujinaka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tomoya Miura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Chikashi Shibata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Sendai 983-8536, Miyagi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kim EM, Park JH, Kim BC, Son IT, Kim JY, Kim JW. Self-expandable metallic stents as a bridge to surgery in obstructive right- and left-sided colorectal cancer: a multicenter cohort study. Sci Rep 2023; 13:438. [PMID: 36624310 PMCID: PMC9829682 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-27767-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) has been proposed as an alternative to emergent surgery (ES) for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC). We aimed to evaluate the perioperative and oncologic outcomes of SEMS as a bridge to surgery in obstructive CRC, as compared with ES. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent curative resection of obstructive CRC at four Hallym University-affiliated hospitals between January 2010 and December 2019. All patients were analyzed overall colon, then according to the side of obstruction (overall, right or left). Of 167 patients, 52 patients underwent ES and 115 underwent SEMS insertion and surgery (SEMS group). The postoperative hospital stay and time to soft diet were shorter in the SEMS group than in the ES group for overall and both sided cancer. The SEMS group had lower rates of stoma formation and severe complications for overall and for left-sided cancer. The 5-year overall survival (P = 0.682) and disease-free survival (P = 0.233) rates were similar in both groups. SEMS insertion as a bridge to surgery was associated with faster recovery, a lower rate of stoma formation with similar oncologic outcomes to those of ES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eui Myung Kim
- grid.256753.00000 0004 0470 5964Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 445-170 Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Ho Park
- grid.256753.00000 0004 0470 5964Department of Surgery, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 445 Gil-1-dong, Gangdong-gu, Seoul, 134-701 Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Chun Kim
- grid.256753.00000 0004 0470 5964Department of Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 948-1, 1, Shingil-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-950 Republic of Korea
| | - Il Tae Son
- grid.256753.00000 0004 0470 5964Department of Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang Si, 445-907 Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Yeon Kim
- grid.256753.00000 0004 0470 5964Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do 445-170 Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Wan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40, Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Takahashi G, Matsumoto S, Yokoyama Y, Sonoda H, Ohta R, Shinji S, Sekiguchi K, Kuriyama S, Kanaka S, Yoshida H. Postoperative infectious complications have a negative oncological impact in patients after stent placement with malignant large bowel obstruction. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:2. [PMID: 36602578 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04290-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In this study, we aimed to investigate the oncological impact of postoperative infection in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction managed by self-expandable metallic stent placement as a bridge to surgery. METHODS The cohort of this multicenter retrospective study comprised 129 patients with pathological stage II/III malignant large bowel obstruction who had undergone bridge to surgery. Patients were allocated to no-postoperative infection (n = 116) and postoperative infection groups (n = 13). RESULTS The postoperative infection group had a significantly greater proportion of men, fewer harvested lymph nodes, and longer postoperative hospital stays than did the no-postoperative infection group. Self-expandable metallic stent-related variables, including clinical failure, were not associated with postoperative infection. Male sex and low body mass index were identified as risk factors for postoperative infection by multivariate logistic regression. Three-year relapse-free survival rates were 75.5% and 30.8% in the no-postoperative infection and postoperative infection groups, respectively; this difference is statistically significant. Male sex, postoperative infection, and T4 were identified as independent prognostic factors by multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. The postoperative infection group had a significantly higher total recurrence rate and shorter interval to recurrence than did the no-postoperative infection group. CONCLUSION To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to show that postoperative infection in bridge to surgery patients has a negative oncological impact. This finding indicates that further improvement in perioperative management of bridge to surgery patients is required to minimize postoperative infection and that patient-risk stratification and additional therapy would contribute to improving oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Tama, 206-8512, Japan
| | - Sho Kuriyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Shintaro Kanaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Lin T, Bissessur AS, Liao P, Yu T, Chen D. Case report: Stent-first strategy as a potential approach in the management of malignant right-sided colonic obstruction with cardiovascular risks. Front Surg 2022; 9:1006020. [PMID: 36211276 PMCID: PMC9535082 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1006020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In obstructing left-sided colonic or rectal cancer, endoscopic stent placement with the purpose of decompression and bridge to elective colon resection has been widely utilized and accepted. However, in malignant right-sided colonic obstruction, stent placement prior to colectomy is still highly controversial, due to lower clinical success and high anastomotic leak. We report a case of malignant right-sided colonic obstruction based on the radiological findings of irregular thickening of ascending colon wall and dilation of proximal large bowel on enhanced computed tomography scan. The 72-year-old woman presented with obvious abdominal distension. Due to concerning cardiovascular complications as intermittent chest pain and a long history of type 2 diabetes, a three-step therapeutic plan was instigated. Initially, a self-expandable metallic stent was placed palliatively to relieve the bowel obstruction. Consecutively, coronary angiography was performed, and two coronary stents were implanted to alleviate more than 80% stenosis of two main coronary arteries. One month later, laparoscopic radical resection of right colon and lymphadenectomy were successfully performed, with a blood loss less than 50 millimeters and a harvest of 29 lymph nodes, 1 being positive. The patient was discharged one week postoperatively with no complications, and received adjuvant chemotherapy one month later. During a follow-up of more than one year, the patient was in complete remission with no recurrence and cardiovascular events. In patients presenting with malignant right-sided colonic obstruction and peril of high cardiovascular risks, we propose colonic and coronary stent-first strategy to emergency surgery as a potential approach so as to ensure sufficient cardiovascular preparation improving perioperative safety. Moreover, the anatomical location of the tumor would be significantly achievable thus granting high-quality radical colon resection and lymphadenectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianyu Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Abdul Saad Bissessur
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Pengfei Liao
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Tunan Yu
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Dingwei Chen
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Correspondence: Dingwei Chen
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Hidalgo-Pujol M, Biondo S, Die Trill J, Vigorita V, Paniagua Garcia-Señorans M, Pascual Migueláñez I, Prieto-La Noire F, Timoteo A, Cornejo L, Martín Parra JI, Fidalgo García M, Solís-Peña A, Cirera de Tudela A, Rodriguez González A, Sánchez-Guillen L, Bustamante Recuenco C, Pérez-Alonso C, Hurtado Caballero E, Pascual M, García Septiem J, Mora López L, Cervera-Aldama J, Guadalajara H, Espín E, Kreisler E. Upfront surgery versus self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery in left-sided colonic cancer obstruction: A multicenter observational study. Surgery 2022; 172:74-82. [PMID: 35168815 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oncological outcomes of self-expanding metallic stent used as a bridge to surgery in potential curative patients with left-sided colonic cancer obstruction remain unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate perioperative and mid-term oncological outcomes of 2 of the currently most commonly performed treatments in left-sided colonic cancer obstruction. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter study including patients with left-sided colonic cancer obstruction treated with curative intent between 2013 and 2017. The presence of metastasis at diagnosis was an exclusion criterion. The primary outcome was to evaluate the noninferiority, in terms of overall survival, of bridge to surgery strategy compared with emergency colonic resection. The secondary outcomes were perioperative morbimortality, disease free survival, local recurrence, and distant recurrence. RESULTS A total of 564 patients were included, 320 in the emergency colonic resection group and 244 in the bridge to surgery group. Twenty-seven patients of the bridge-to-surgery group needed urgent operation. Postoperative morbidity rates were statistically higher in the emergency colonic resection group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.37 [0.24-0.55], P < .001). There was no difference in 90-day mortality between groups (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.85 [0.36-1.99], P = .702). The median follow-up was 3.80 years (2.29-4.92). The results show the noninferiority of bridge to surgery versus emergency colonic resection in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval) 0.78 [0.56-1.07], P = .127). There were no differences in disease free survival, distant recurrence, and local recurrence rates between bridge to surgery and emergency colonic resection groups. CONCLUSION Self-expanding metallic stent as bridge to surgery might not lead to a negative impact on the long-term prognosis of the tumor compared with emergency colonic resection in expert hands and selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Hidalgo-Pujol
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona and IBIDELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Sebastiano Biondo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona and IBIDELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier Die Trill
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Vincenzo Vigorita
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Vigo, Spain; General Surgery Research Group, SERGAS-UVIGO, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Vigo, Spain
| | - Marta Paniagua Garcia-Señorans
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Vigo, Spain; General Surgery Research Group, SERGAS-UVIGO, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Vigo, Spain
| | | | | | - Ander Timoteo
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Doctor Josep Trueta University Hospital, Girona, Spain
| | - Lidia Cornejo
- General and digestive surgery research group. Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Girona, Spain
| | - José Ignacio Martín Parra
- Division of Coloproctology, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - María Fidalgo García
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | - Alejandro Solís-Peña
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomic University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arturo Cirera de Tudela
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Araceli Rodriguez González
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Emergency Surgery Unit, Donostia University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Luís Sánchez-Guillen
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Elche University Hospital, Alicante, Spain
| | - Carlos Bustamante Recuenco
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Nuestra Señora del Prado Hospital, Talavera de la Reina, Toledo, Spain
| | - Carla Pérez-Alonso
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, La Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Elena Hurtado Caballero
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marta Pascual
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Javier García Septiem
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, La Princesa University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Laura Mora López
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Parc Taulí University Hospital, Sabadell, Spain
| | - Jorge Cervera-Aldama
- Coloproctology Unit. General and Digestive Surgery Department. Cruces University Hospital. Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Héctor Guadalajara
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eloy Espín
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Autonomic University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Esther Kreisler
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Coloproctology Unit, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain; University of Barcelona and IBIDELL (Bellvitge Biomedical Investigation Institute), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Surgical management and outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer in elderly patients: A multi-institutional retrospective study. Surgery 2022; 172:60-68. [PMID: 34998620 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 12/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The outcomes and prognostic factors of elderly patients with obstructive colorectal cancer are unknown. This was the focus of our multi-institutional retrospective study. METHODS Medical records of 520 patients (elderly [group E, aged ≥75 years, n = 271]; and nonelderly [group NE, aged <75 years, n = 249]) who received treatment for obstructive colorectal cancer in 2008 to 2018 at 14 leading hospitals in Kagawa prefecture (Japan) were reviewed. Short- and long-term outcomes of patients who underwent tumor resection (n = 438) were compared between the groups. Their prognostic factors were identified. RESULTS The tumor resection rate was 79% (n = 213) and 90% (n = 225) in groups E and NE, respectively. Group E had more emergency resections (27 [12.7%] vs 15 [6.6%], P = .037), shorter operating times (194 vs 221 min, P < .001), fewer dissected lymph nodes (14 vs 17, P = .004), and less adjuvant chemotherapy (47 [26.8%] vs 122 [76.7%], p < .001) than group NE. Postoperative complication rates and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between the groups. Overall survival was significantly lower in group E than in group NE. Distant metastases and no postoperative chemotherapy were independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival in groups E and NE. Emergency resection (hazard ratio:1.83; 95% confidence interval: 1.02-3.26) was a significant poor prognostic indicator in group E only. CONCLUSIONS The short-term outcomes and recurrence-free survival of elderly and nonelderly patients with obstructive colorectal cancer were similar, although the 90-day mortality rate of the elderly patients was higher. Furthermore, elective surgery after bowel decompression is associated with a better outcome in the elderly.
Collapse
|
30
|
Prompt intervention in large bowel obstruction management: A Nationwide Inpatient Sample analysis. Am J Surg 2022; 224:1262-1266. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
31
|
Kondo A, Kumamoto K, Kobara H, Nagahara T, Wato M, Shibatoge M, Minato T, Masaki T, Okano K. Outcomes of Patients with Left-Sided Obstructive Colorectal Cancer: Comparison between Self-Expandable Metallic Stent and Other Treatment Methods. Dig Surg 2022; 39:117-124. [PMID: 35462370 DOI: 10.1159/000524645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This multi-institutional retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preoperative self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement for patients with left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer (OCRC). METHODS Overall, 520 consecutive patients who received treatment for OCRC were enrolled. Of these, the data of 253 patients who underwent primary tumour resection for left-sided OCRC were reviewed. The short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the SEMS group and other three groups: transanal decompression tube (TaDT), decompressing stoma (DS), and emergency resection (ER). RESULTS The SEMS group had a higher frequency of laparoscopic surgery (p < 0.001), lesser frequency of postoperative stoma (p < 0.001), and more dissected lymph nodes (p < 0.001) than the other groups. Moreover, the SEMS group had shorter postoperative hospital stays than the TaDT, DS, and ER groups (p = 0.005, p = 0.037, and p < 0.001, respectively). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves of recurrence-free survival and overall survival did not differ significantly between the SEMS group and the other three groups in patients with stage II and III diseases. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION Elective surgery after SEMS placement may improve short-term outcomes compared to other treatment strategies, with similar long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Kondo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Kensuke Kumamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Hideki Kobara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Teruya Nagahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mitoyo General Hospital, Kanonji, Japan
| | - Masaki Wato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Takuya Minato
- Department of Surgery, Shikoku Medical Center for Children and Adults, Zentsuji, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Masaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | - Keiichi Okano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kagawa University, Takamatsu, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Alavi K, Poylin V, Davids JS, Patel SV, Felder S, Valente MA, Paquette IM, Feingold DL. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Colonic Volvulus and Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 2021; 64:1046-1057. [PMID: 34016826 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Alavi
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | | | - Jennifer S Davids
- University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Treatment outcome of laparoscopic surgery after self-expandable metallic stent insertion for obstructive colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:2029-2036. [PMID: 34319530 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01990-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We assessed the technical and oncological safety of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion followed by laparoscopic colorectal surgery as a bridge to surgery (BTS) for obstructive colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS A retrospective, single-center study analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes of SEMS insertion followed by laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients with stage II/III/IV obstructive CRC from 2012 to 2020 at Cancer Institute Hospital. RESULTS In 66 patients, including 28 stage IV patients, the clinical success rates of SEMS insertion were 97%. In laparoscopic surgery, primary anastomosis was performed in 61 patients (92%), and open conversion was required in 2 patients (3%). Postoperative complications were seen in 9 patients (13%); however, there was no anastomotic leakage or mortality. Curative resection was achieved in all 38 stage II/III patients and 15 of 28 (54%) stage IV patients. Stage IV patients had a longer operation time and greater blood loss than stage II/III patients; however, the open conversion and postoperative complication rates were similar between the groups. In stage II/III patients, 3-year disease-free survival and 3-year overall survival [OS] were 87.1 and 89.5%, respectively. The median OS of stage IV patients was 34.9 months, and stage IV patients who underwent R0 resection showed a significantly better OS (P = 0.0011) than those with R2 resection. CONCLUSION SEMS insertion followed by laparoscopic surgery is a feasible treatment strategy that achieves a high-primary anastomosis rate without severe postoperative complication in not only stage II/III but also stage IV obstructive CRC patients.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Large bowel obstruction is a serious and potentially life-threatening surgical emergency which is associated with high morbidity and mortality rate. The most common etiology is colorectal cancer which accounts for over 60% of all large bowel obstructions. Proper assessment, thoughtful decision-making and prompt treatment is necessary to decrease the high morbidity and mortality which is associated with this entity. Knowledge of the key elements regarding the presentation of a patient with a large bowel obstruction will help the surgeon in formulating an appropriate treatment plan for the patient. Comprehensive knowledge and understanding of the various treatment options available is necessary when caring for these patients. This chapter will review the presentation of patients with malignant large bowel obstruction, discuss the various diagnostic modalities available, as well as discuss treatment options and the various clinical scenarios in which they are most appropriately utilized.
Collapse
|
35
|
Reinke CE, Lim RB. Minimally invasive acute care surgery. Curr Probl Surg 2021; 59:101031. [PMID: 35227422 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
36
|
Reinke CE, Lim RB. Minimally Invasive Acute Care Surgery. Curr Probl Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpsurg.2021.101033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
|
37
|
Abstract
It is essential for the colon and rectal surgeon to understand the evaluation and management of patients with both small and large bowel obstructions. Computed tomography is usually the most appropriate and accurate diagnostic imaging modality for most suspected bowel obstructions. Additional commonly used imaging modalities include plain radiographs and contrast imaging/fluoroscopy, while less commonly utilized imaging modalities include ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Regardless of the imaging modality used, interpretation of imaging should involve a systematic, methodological approach to ensure diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David W Nelms
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Brian R Kann
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Takahashi G, Toyoda T, Matsumoto S, Shinji S, Ohta R, Sonoda H, Yokoyama Y, Sekiguchi K, Yoshida H. Does the diameter of colonic stent influence the outcomes in bridge-to-surgery patients with malignant large bowel obstruction? Surg Today 2021; 51:986-993. [PMID: 33247782 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-020-02185-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study investigated the short- and long-term outcomes of 18- and 22-mm-diameter self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO). METHODS Sixty-nine pathological stage II and III colorectal cancer patients who underwent BTS were included in this multi-institutional retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups regarding the diameter of SEMS: an 18-mm group (n = 30) and a 22-mm group (n = 39). RESULTS There was no significant difference in the clinical success rate, but both of the two re-obstructions observed occurred in the 18-mm group. The 18-mm group showed a trend toward a higher incidence of overall postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grading ≥ II) than the 22-mm group (33.3% vs. 10.3%, P = 0.061). The 3-year disease-free and overall survival showed no significant differences between the 18- and 22-mm groups (78.2% vs. 68.8%, P = 0.753 and 92.8% vs. 82.1%, P = 0.471, respectively). CONCLUSION SEMS of 18 and 22 mm diameter confer statistically equivalent short- and long-term outcomes as a BTS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Tetsutaka Toyoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Yokoyama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, 1-396 Kosugi-cho, Nakahara-ku, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 211-8533, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Matsumoto S, Shinji S, Ohta R, Sonoda H, Takahashi G, Iwai T, Takeda K, Sekiguchi K, Yoshida H. Systemic Chemotherapy is a Promising Treatment Option for Patients with Colonic Stents: A Review. J Anus Rectum Colon 2021; 5:1-10. [PMID: 33537495 PMCID: PMC7843144 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2020-061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Approximately 10% of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO) at diagnosis. Furthermore, for 35% of patients with MLBO, curative primary tumor resection is unfeasible because of locally advanced disease and comorbidities. The practice of placing a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) has dramatically increased as an effective palliative treatment. Recent advances in systemic chemotherapy for metastatic CRC have significantly contributed to prolonging patients' prognosis and expanding the indications. However, the safety and efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in patients with SEMS have not been established. This review outlines the current status of this relatively new therapeutic strategy and future perspectives. Some reports on this topic have demonstrated that 1) systemic chemotherapy and the addition of molecular targeted agents contribute to prolonged survival in patients with SEMS; 2) delayed SEMS-related complications are a major concern, and this requires strict patient monitoring; however, primary tumor control by chemotherapy might result in decreased complications, especially regarding re-obstruction; and 3) using bevacizumab could be a risk factor for SEMS-related perforation, which may be lethal. Although this relatively new approach for unresectable stage IV obstructive CRC requires a well-planned clinical trial, this therapy could be promising for patients who are unideal candidates for emergency surgery and require immediate systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, Kamagari, Inzai, Japan
| | - Seiichi Shinji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryo Ohta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiromichi Sonoda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Goro Takahashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takuma Iwai
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kohki Takeda
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Endo S, Kumamoto K, Enomoto T, Koizumi K, Kato H, Saida Y. Comparison of survival and perioperative outcome of the colonic stent and the transanal decompression tube placement and emergency surgery for left-sided obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multi-center observational study "The CODOMO study". Int J Colorectal Dis 2021; 36:987-998. [PMID: 33247313 PMCID: PMC8026453 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03806-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Advances in endoscopic technology have led to the reevaluation of self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement as a bridge-to-surgery (BTS) in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. In Japan, after inclusion of SEMS placement as a BTS in the medical insurance coverage in 2012, this procedure has been increasingly performed. However, a transanal decompression tube (TADT) placement has been used as a BTS. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the optimal strategy for obstructive left-sided colorectal cancer (OLCRC) by comparing SEMS and TADT placement with emergency surgery. METHODS We included 301 patients with stage II and III OLCRC from 27 institutions. The study patients were divided into Surgery group (emergency surgery, n = 103), SEMS group (BTS by SEMS, n = 113), and TADT group (BTS by TADT, n = 85). We compared the survival and perioperative outcomes of patients in the Surgery group as a standard treatment with those in the SEMS and TADT groups. RESULTS The 3-year relapse-free survival rate in patients in the Surgery group was 74.8%, while that in patients in the SEMS group and TADT group were 69.0% (p = 0.39) and 55.3% (p = 0.006), respectively. The technical success rate was not statistically different, but the clinical success rate was significantly higher in the SEMS group than in the TADT group (p = 0.0040). With regard to postoperative complications after curative surgery, the SEMS group had significantly lower of complications (≥ grade 2) than the Surgery group (p = 0.022). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent SEMS placement for OLCRC had similar oncological outcomes to patients who underwent emergency surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shungo Endo
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizu-Wakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan.
| | - K Kumamoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, Aizu-Wakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - T Enomoto
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Koizumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer Infectious Disease Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Kato
- Department of Clinical Laboratory and Endoscopy, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Capona R, Hassab T, Sapci I, Aiello A, Liska D, Holubar S, Lightner AL, Steele SR, Valente MA. Surgical intervention for mechanical large bowel obstruction at a tertiary hospital: Which patients receive a stoma and how often are they reversed? Am J Surg 2020; 221:594-597. [PMID: 33288223 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical management of large bowel obstruction (LBO) is heterogeneous and influenced by multiple variables. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the surgical interventions and outcomes of patients necessitating surgery for LBO. METHODS Patients with LBO between 2000 and 2017 were included. Main outcomes measures are intraoperative findings, operative management, post-operative outcomes and stoma closure rates. RESULTS 133 patients were included with predominately left-sided obstruction (82%). The most common etiology was colorectal cancer (44%) followed by extrinsic malignant compression (29%). The most common operation performed was fecal diversion without resection (46%). This group had significantly more stage 4 carcinoma, carcinomatosis and had the lowest stoma closure rate (16%). Eighty-six percent of the operated patients underwent fecal diversion, of these, 27% had stoma reversal at 6 months. Patients that had a resection and anastomosis with diverting loop ileostomy were most likely to undergo stoma reversal (p = 0.005) and had the lowest number of patients with stage-IV carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS In this single institution analysis, the management of LBO entails high operative and stoma rates, with less than 30% of patient undergoing stoma closure. Resection, anastomosis and DLI had the highest chance of stoma reversal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Capona
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Tarek Hassab
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ipek Sapci
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alexandra Aiello
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Stefan Holubar
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amy L Lightner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Scott R Steele
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michael A Valente
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tajima JY, Matsuhashi N, Takahashi T, Mizutani C, Iwata Y, Kiyama S, Kubota M, Ibuka T, Araki H, Shimizu M, Doi K, Yoshida K. Short- and long-term outcomes after colonic self-expandable metal stent placement for malignant large-bowel obstruction as a bridge to surgery focus on the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach: a retrospective, single center study. World J Surg Oncol 2020; 18:265. [PMID: 33050929 PMCID: PMC7556958 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-020-02039-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Malignant large-bowel obstruction (MLBO) is a highly urgent condition in colorectal cancer with high complication rates. Self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement in MLBO is a new decompression treatment in Japan. Preoperative stent placement (bridge to surgery: BTS) avoids emergency surgery, but oncological influences of stent placement and post-BTS surgical approach remain unclear. We examined short- and long-term results of surgery for MLBO after SEMS placement in our hospital. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 75 patients with MLBO who underwent resection after SEMS placement at our hospital from June 2013 to December 2018. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were evaluated by comparison with the surgical approach. Results Tumor location was significantly higher in the left-side colon and rectum (n = 59, 78.7%) than right-side colon (n = 16, 21.3%). Technical and clinical success rates for SEMS placement were 97.3% and 96.0%, respectively. Laparoscopic surgery was performed in 54 patients (69.0%), and one-stage anastomosis was performed in 73 (97.3%). Postoperative complications were similar in the open surgery (open) group (n = 5, 23.8%) and laparoscopic surgery (lap) group (n = 7, 13.0%), with no severe complications requiring reoperation. Three-year overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were not significantly different in the lap vs open group (67.5% vs 66.4%; 82.2% vs 62.5%). Conclusion Preoperative stent treatment avoids stoma construction but allows anastomosis. One-time surgery was performed safely contributing to minimally invasive treatment and acceptable short- and long-term results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Yu Tajima
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Nobuhisa Matsuhashi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan.
| | - Takao Takahashi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Chika Mizutani
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Iwata
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| | - Shigeru Kiyama
- General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masaya Kubota
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Takashi Ibuka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Araki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masahito Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Doi
- General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Gifu University Hospital, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Yoshida
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-city, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ormando VM, Palma R, Fugazza A, Repici A. Colonic stents for malignant bowel obstruction: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2019; 16:1053-1061. [PMID: 31778081 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2019.1697229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Although more than two decades are already passed from the first description of this technique, the debate remains open on the role of self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) placement in the management of malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). According to most recent data, SEMS placement is considered a safe and effective alternative treatment as a bridge to surgery(BTS). In addition, stent placement should be considered as primary option for palliative treatment of obstructing cancer.Areas covered: Current status, indication, technique, oncological outcomes, advantages, and risks of SEMS placement in MBO were reviewed.Expert commentary: The placement of colonic SEMS for palliation and for BTS in patients with MBO has been increasingly reported and it seems to have several advantages over emergency surgery. Substantial concerns of tumor seeding following SEMS placement, especially in case of perforation, have been raised in numerous studies. Actually, no significant differences are reported in oncologic long-term survival between patients undergoing stent placement as a BTS and those undergoing emergency surgery. Considering all the mentioned factors, indication for colorectal stenting should be evaluated only in highly specialized centers, in the context of multidisciplinary approach where risks and benefits of stenting are carefully weighed, especially in the BTS setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Maria Ormando
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Rossella Palma
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chen XQ, Xue CR, Hou P, Lin BQ, Zhang JR. Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio effectively predicts survival outcome of patients with obstructive colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4970-4984. [PMID: 31543687 PMCID: PMC6737316 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i33.4970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstructive colorectal cancer (OCC) is always accompanied by severe complications, and the optimal strategy for patients with OCC remains undetermined. Different from emergency surgery (ES), self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS), could increase the likelihood of primary anastomosis. However, the stent failure and related complications might give rise to a high recurrence rate. Few studies have focused on the indications for either method, and the relationship between preoperative inflammation indexes and the prognosis of OCC is still underestimated.
AIM To explore the indications for ES and BTS in OCCs based on preoperative inflammation indexes.
METHODS One hundred and twenty-eight patients who underwent ES or BTS from 2008 to 2015 were enrolled. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to define the optimal preoperative inflammation index and its cutoff point. Kaplan–Meier analyses and Cox proportional hazards models were applied to assess the association between the preoperative inflammation indexes and the survival outcomes [overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)]. Stratification analysis was performed to identify the subgroups that would benefit from ES or BTS.
RESULTS OS and DFS were comparable between the ES and BTS groups (P > 0.05). ROC curve analysis showed derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) as the optimal biomarker for the prediction of DFS in ES (P < 0.05). Lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) was recommended for BTS with regard to OS and DFS (P < 0.05). dNLR was related to stoma construction (P = 0.001), pneumonia (P = 0.054), and DFS (P = 0.009) in ES. LMR was closely related to lymph node invasion (LVI) (P = 0.009), OS (P = 0.020), and DFS (P = 0.046) in the BTS group. dNLR was an independent risk factor for ES in both OS (P = 0.032) and DFS (P = 0.016). LMR affected OS (P = 0.053) and DFS (P = 0.052) in the BTS group. LMR could differentiate the OS between the ES and BTS groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION Preoperative dNLR and LMR could predict OS and DFS in patients undergoing ES and BTS, respectively. For OCC, as the potential benefit group, patients with a low LMR might be preferred for BTS via SEMS insertion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xian-Qiang Chen
- Department of General Surgery (Emergency Surgery), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Chao-Rong Xue
- Department of General Surgery (Emergency Surgery), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Ping Hou
- Immunotherapy Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350122, Fujian Province, China
| | - Bing-Qiang Lin
- Department of General Surgery (Emergency Surgery), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
| | - Jun-Rong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery (Emergency Surgery), Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Matsuda A, Yamada T, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Kawano Y, Sekiguchi K, Matsutani T, Miyashita M, Yoshida H. Short-term outcomes of a self-expandable metallic stent as a bridge to surgery vs. a transanal decompression tube for malignant large-bowel obstruction: a meta-analysis. Surg Today 2019; 49:728-737. [PMID: 30798434 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-019-01784-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preoperative intestinal decompression, using either a self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery (BTS) or a transanal decompression tube (TDT), provides an alternative to emergency surgery for malignant large-bowel obstruction (MLBO). We conducted this meta-analysis to compare the short-term outcomes of SEMS placement as a BTS vs. TDT placement for MLBO. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive electronic search of literature published up to March, 2018, to identify studies comparing the short-term outcomes of BTS vs. TDT. Decompression device-related and surgery-related variables were evaluated and a meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to calculate odd ratios with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS We analyzed 14 nonrandomized studies with a collective total of 581 patients: 307 (52.8%) who underwent SEMS placement as a BTS and 274 (47.2%) who underwent TDT placement. The meta-analyses showed that the BTS strategy conferred significantly better technical and clinical success, helped to maintain quality of life by allowing free food intake and temporal discharge, promoted laparoscopic one-stage surgery without stoma creation, and had equivalent morbidity and mortality to TDT placement. CONCLUSIONS Although the long-term outcomes are as yet undetermined, the BTS strategy using SEMS placement could be a new standard of care for preoperative decompression to manage MLBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Yamada
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Sakurazawa
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Youichi Kawano
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Takeshi Matsutani
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Masao Miyashita
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715, Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Saida Y. Current status of colonic stent for obstructive colorectal cancer in Japan; a review of the literature. JOURNAL OF THE ANUS RECTUM AND COLON 2019; 3:99-105. [PMID: 31583324 PMCID: PMC6774736 DOI: 10.23922/jarc.2019-009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer in Japan. Approximately 10%-20% of the patients with colorectal cancer present with large bowel obstruction, and those who present with malignant colonic obstruction (MCO) require urgent decompression because MCO can cause electrolytic fluid imbalance, colonic necrosis, bacterial translocation, and death. Placement of colonic stents (self-expandable metallic stents) for MCO is a major and standard endoscopic treatment that has been available since 2012 in Japan. This review presents the current conditions and future prospects of this procedure based on the literature. The current indication of colonic stent placement is malignant colorectal stenosis. One of the purposes of using stents is palliative treatment; further, its advantages over emergency surgery with colostomy include avoidance of colostomy, relief of obstruction, shorter hospitalization, and better quality of life. In addition, stent placement can also be used as a bridge to surgery since the duration of the hospitalization is shorter and postoperative complications, colostomy rates, and mortality rates are lower with elective than with emergency surgery. Although recent studies have reported low complication rates related to colonic stents, complications may still occur, highlighting the importance of good preparation, adequate staffing, backup systems, and informed consent. The current major problem related to colonic stents is the lack of evidence on patients' long-term prognoses for bridge to surgery purposes, awaiting the results of ongoing clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihisa Saida
- Department of Surgery, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lara-Romero C, Vilches Á, Caunedo-Álvarez Á, Hergueta-Delgado P, Lavín-Castejón I, Andrade-Bellido R, Alcaín-Martínez G. Better recurrence-free survival after stent bridge to surgery compared to emergency surgery for obstructive left-sided colonic cancer in patients with stage III status of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC): a bicentric retrospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2019; 34:1241-1250. [PMID: 31129696 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03318-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stenting as a bridge to surgery (SBTS) can transform an emergency surgery (ES) into an elective surgery in patients with symptomatic left-sided malignant colonic obstruction. Concerns have been raised regarding short-term morbidity and long-term oncologic outcomes, with contrasting results reported in the literature. Our main aim is to evaluate not only long-term oncologic outcomes but also short-term postoperative outcomes of stented patients who underwent elective surgery compared to those who had ES. METHODS From January 2006 to May 2012, we retrospectively identified patients with confirmed left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. This was done in two centers of reference of colorectal diseases in southern Spain with patients who were treated with curative intent either with ES or SBTS. The short- and long-term results were compared between both groups. RESULTS There were 71 patients in the stenting group and 66 in the emergency surgery group, with similar demographic data. Initial stoma creation rates were lower in the SBTS group (16.9% vs. 54.5%, p < 0.005) and the primary anastomosis rate was higher in the same group (83.1% vs. 45.5%, p < 0.005). Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were comparable between groups (75.3 vs. 59.8%, p = 0.220), but RFS rates at 5 years for AJCC pathologic stage III were higher in the stenting group (69.7% vs 30%, p = 0.004). Both groups were comparable regarding overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS The use of SBTS reduces ostomy rates in patients with obstructive colon malignancies. Long-term survival results are similar. Patients in the SBTS group with stage III AJCC status showed a higher 5-year recurrence-free survival rate than those in the ES group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Lara-Romero
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga, Spain. .,Department of Digestive Diseases, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
| | - Ángel Vilches
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, Seville University, Seville, Spain
| | - Ángel Caunedo-Álvarez
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Isabel Lavín-Castejón
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | - Raúl Andrade-Bellido
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Virgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, Consten ECJ, Veld JV, van Halsema EE, Bemelman WA, Siersema PD, Ter Borg F, van Hooft JE, Tanis PJ. Propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcome between stent as bridge to surgery and emergency resection in patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1075-1086. [PMID: 31074507 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement as bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with left-sided obstructing colonic cancer has shown promising short-term results, it is used infrequently owing to uncertainty about its oncological safety. This population study compared long-term oncological outcomes between emergency resection and SEMS placement as BTS. METHODS Through a national collaborative research project, long-term outcome data were collected for all patients who underwent resection for left-sided obstructing colonic cancer between 2009 and 2016 in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients were identified from the Dutch Colorectal Audit database. SEMS as BTS was compared with emergency resection in the curative setting after 1 : 2 propensity score matching. RESULTS Some 222 patients who had a stent placed were matched to 444 who underwent emergency resection. The overall SEMS-related perforation rate was 7·7 per cent (17 of 222). Three-year locoregional recurrence rates after SEMS insertion and emergency resection were 11·4 and 13·6 per cent (P = 0·457), disease-free survival rates were 58·8 and 52·6 per cent (P = 0·175), and overall survival rates were 74·0 and 68·3 per cent (P = 0·231), respectively. SEMS placement resulted in significantly fewer permanent stomas (23·9 versus 45·3 per cent; P < 0·001), especially in elderly patients (29·0 versus 57·9 per cent; P < 0·001). For patients in the SEMS group with or without perforation, 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 18 and 11·0 per cent (P = 0·432), disease-free survival rates were 49 and 59·6 per cent (P = 0·717), and overall survival rates 61 and 75·1 per cent (P = 0·529), respectively. CONCLUSION Overall, SEMS as BTS seems an oncologically safe alternative to emergency resection with fewer permanent stomas. Nevertheless, the risk of SEMS-related perforation, as well as permanent stoma, might influence shared decision-making for individual patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F J Amelung
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - W A A Borstlap
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - J V Veld
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E E van Halsema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W A Bemelman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud Academic Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - F Ter Borg
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands
| | - J E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P J Tanis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Catena F, De Simone B, Coccolini F, Di Saverio S, Sartelli M, Ansaloni L. Bowel obstruction: a narrative review for all physicians. World J Emerg Surg 2019; 14:20. [PMID: 31168315 PMCID: PMC6489175 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-019-0240-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Small and large bowel obstructions are responsible for approximately 15% of hospital admissions for acute abdominal pain in the USA and ~ 20% of cases needing acute surgical care. Starting from the analysis of a common clinical problem, we want to guide primary care physicians in the initial management of a patient presenting with acute abdominal pain associated with intestinal obstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fausto Catena
- 1Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- 1Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Via Gramsci 14, 43126 Parma, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Luca Ansaloni
- Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Cesena Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, Sakurazawa N, Kawano Y, Yamahatsu K, Sekiguchi K, Yamada M, Hatori T, Yoshida H. Colonic stent-induced mechanical compression may suppress cancer cell proliferation in malignant large bowel obstruction. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:1290-1297. [PMID: 30171397 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6411-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 08/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The short-term safety and efficacy of insertion of a self-expandable metallic colonic stent (SEMS) followed by elective surgery, "bridge to surgery (BTS)", for malignant large bowel obstruction (MLBO) have been well described; however, the influence on long-term oncological outcomes is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in oncological characteristics in colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues after SEMS insertion, focusing on growth factors, cell cycle and apoptosis. METHODS From January 2013 to September 2014, a total of 25 patients with MLBO who underwent BTS at our single institution were retrospectively included. Paired CRC tissue samples before (endoscopic biopsy) and after SEMS insertion (surgically resected) were collected from each patient. EGFR, VEGF, Ki-67, p27kip1 and TUNEL expression were determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS No clinical or subclinical perforations evaluated by mechanical ulceration pathologically were observed. Epithelial exfoliation, tumour necrosis, infiltration of inflammatory cells and fibrosis were observed in SEMS-inserted surgically-resected specimens. Overall, 84% (21/25) and 60% (15/25) of patients exhibited no change or a decrease in staining category, respectively, for EGFR and VEGF expression after SEMS insertion. A significant decrease in Ki-67 expression was observed in surgically-resected specimens compared with endoscopic biopsy specimens (P < 0.01). The upstream cell cycle inhibitor, p27kip1, was significantly increased after SEMS insertion (P = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Although the long-term safety of BTS should be determined in a future clinical trial, mechanical compression by SEMS may suppress cancer cell proliferation and this result could provide some insights into the issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihisa Matsuda
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan.
| | - Masao Miyashita
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Satoshi Matsumoto
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Sakurazawa
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Youichi Kawano
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Kazuya Yamahatsu
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Kumiko Sekiguchi
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Marina Yamada
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Hatori
- Department of Pathology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital, 1715 Kamagari, Inzai, Chiba, 270-1694, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Surgery, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| |
Collapse
|