|
1
|
Abera SF, Robers G, Kästner A, Stentzel U, Weitmann K, Hoffmann W. Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in colon cancer patients: a study protocol for emulating a target trial using cancer registry data. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2025; 151:34. [PMID: 39798018 PMCID: PMC11724780 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-06057-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this study is to compare the 5 year overall survival of patients with stage I-III colon cancer treated by laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy. METHODS Using Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania Cancer Registry data from 2008 to 2018, we will emulate a phase III, multicenter, open-label, two-parallel-arm hypothetical target trial in adult patients with stage I-III colon cancer who received laparoscopic or open colectomy as an elective treatment. An inverse-probability weighted Royston‒Parmar parametric survival model (RPpsm) will be used to estimate the hazard ratio of laparoscopic versus open surgery after confounding factors are balanced between the two treatment arms. Further to the hazard ratio, we will also compute differences in the absolute risk (at 1, 3, and 5 years) and restricted mean survival time (up to 1, 3, and 5 years). A weighted Kaplan‒Meier curve will be used to compare five-year overall survival in both treatment arms. Various comparator and sensitivity analyses will be performed to check the robustness of the results that will be estimated by the RPpsm main model. Treatment period- and stage-specific results will also be provided. DISCUSSION This study aims to causally model the effect of laparoscopic versus open colectomy on 5 year overall survival using a target trial emulation approach. As the cancer registry data do not cover BMI, comorbidity, and previous abdominal surgery for non-malignant indications, the potential for residual confounding arising from these factors is a limitation of this study. This will be approached in a quantitative bias analysis using the E-method. The results will substantiate existing evidence on the comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in patients with stage I-III colon cancer and may guide clinical decisions as to whether a laparoscopic approach is as safe as an open approach in terms of improving 5-year overall survival in these patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semaw Ferede Abera
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Gabriele Robers
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
- Cancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Anika Kästner
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ulrike Stentzel
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Kerstin Weitmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
- Cancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hoffmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, Section Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, University Medicine Greifswald, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
- Cancer Registry Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Cariati M, Brisinda G, Chiarello MM. Has the open surgical approach in colorectal cancer really become uncommon? World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1485-1492. [PMID: 38983350 PMCID: PMC11230011 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world. Surgery is mandatory to treat patients with colorectal cancer. Can colorectal cancer be treated in laparoscopy? Scientific literature has validated the oncological quality of laparoscopic approach for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer. Randomized non-inferiority trials with good remote control have answered positively to this long-debated question. Early as 1994, first publications demonstrated technical feasibility and compliance with oncological imperatives and, as far as short-term outcomes are concerned, there is no difference in terms of mortality and post-operative morbidity between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches, but only longer operating times at the beginning of the experience. Subsequently, from 2007 onwards, long-term results were published that demonstrated the absence of a significant difference regarding overall survival, disease-free survival, quality of life, local and distant recurrence rates between open and minimally invasive surgery. In this editorial, we aim to summarize the clinical and technical aspects which, even today, make the use of open surgery relevant and necessary in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cariati
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Crotone, Crotone 88900, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Brisinda
- Abdominal and Endocrine Metabolic Medical and Surgical Sciences, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome 00168, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Chan C, Tan YC, Lim EW, Teo JY, Lin J, Tan WJ, Tay GCA, Tan EKW, Seow-En I. Evaluating the surgical trainee ergonomic experience during minimally invasive abdominal surgery (ESTEEMA study). Sci Rep 2024; 14:12502. [PMID: 38822017 PMCID: PMC11143188 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63516-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Minimally invasive abdominal surgery (MAS) can exert a physical cost. Surgical trainees spend years assisting minimally-invasive surgeries, increasing the risk of workplace injury. This prospective questionnaire-based cohort study was conducted amongst general surgery residents in Singapore. Residents assisting major MAS surgery were invited to complete anonymous online survey forms after surgery. The Phase 1 survey assessed physical discomfort scores and risk factors. Intraoperative measures to improve ergonomics were administered and evaluated in Phase 2. During Phase 1 (October 2021 to April 2022), physical discomfort was reported in at least one body part in 82.6% (n = 38) of respondents. Over a third of respondents reported severe discomfort in at least one body part (n = 17, 37.0%). Extremes of height, training seniority, longer surgical duration and operative complexity were significant risk factors for greater physical discomfort. In Phase 2 (October 2022 to February 2023), the overall rate of physical symptoms and severe discomfort improved to 81.3% (n = 52) and 34.4% (n = 22) respectively. The ergonomic measure most found useful was having separate television monitors for the primary surgeon and assistants, followed by intraoperative feedback on television monitor angle or position. Close to 20% of survey respondents felt that surgeon education was likely to improve physical discomfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Chan
- Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857, Singapore
| | - Ying Ching Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Ee Wen Lim
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Jin-Yao Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Jinlin Lin
- Department of General Surgery, Changi General Hospital, 2 Simei Street 3, Singapore, 529889, Singapore
| | - Winson JianHong Tan
- Department of General Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, 110 Sengkang East Way, Singapore, 544886, Singapore
| | - Gerald Ci An Tay
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Emile Kwong-Wei Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Isaac Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rodriguez SLR, Montoro DFS, De la Cruz Ku G, del Rocio Luna Munoz C, Bustamante CRR. Risk factors of anastomotic leak in colorectal cancer: a multicentric study in a Latin American country. Ecancermedicalscience 2024; 18:1696. [PMID: 38774568 PMCID: PMC11108052 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2024.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The anastomotic leak (AL) is one of the most feared complications of colorectal surgery, since it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay and cost of care. Our aim was to determine the risk factors associated with anastomosis leak in colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection with anastomosis. Methods A multicentre observational, analytical, retrospective and case-control study was carried out. For each case, two controls were included from three national hospitals from Lima, Peru during the period 2021-2022. To determine the degree of association, multivariate logistic regression model was carried out. Results A total of 360 patients were included, 120 from each hospital. The mean age of the population was 68.03 ± 14.21 years old. The majority were 65 years old or older (66.1%), 52.8% were female, and 63.3% had clinical stage III. The 40% of the patients had albumin levels lower than 3.5 g/dL. Regarding the surgery, 96.4% were elective, 68.9% underwent open approach, and 80.8% had an operative time of more than 180 minutes. Most of them had right colon cancer (50.8%). In the multivariate analysis, a significant association was found with the age variable (OR = 2.48; 95%CI:1.24-4.97), clinical tumour level (OR = 2.71; 95%CI:1.34-5.48), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Score (OR = 3.23; 95%CI:1.10-9.50), preoperative serum albumin (OR = 22.2; 95%CI:11.5-42.9). Conclusion The most important independent risk factors associated with AL among patients with colorectal cancer were pre-operative such as lower preoperative serum albumin levels, followed by a higher ASA Score, clinical-stage III-IV, and an age ≥65 years old.
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Yang S, Lin Y, Zhong W, Xu W, Huang Z, Cai S, Chen W, Zhang B. Impact of ileostomy on postoperative wound complications in patients after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis. Int Wound J 2024; 21:e14493. [PMID: 37989718 PMCID: PMC10898402 DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023] Open
Abstract
To prevent anastomotic leakage and other postoperative complications after laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, a protective ileostomy is often used. However, the necessity of performing ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer remains controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the benefit of ileostomy on wound infection after laparoscopic rectal cancer. The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed were used to retrieve all related documents up to September 2023. Completion of the trial literature was submitted once the eligibility and exclusion criteria were met and the literature quality assessment was evaluated. This study compared the post-operative post-operative complications of an ileostomy with that of non-ileostomy in a laparoscope. We used Reman 5.3 to analyse meta-data. Controlled studies were evaluated with ROBINS-I. The meta-analyses included 525 studies, and 5 publications were chosen to statistically analyse the data according to the classification criteria. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of postoperative wound infections among ostomate and nonostomate (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66, 4.84; p = 0.25). In 5 trials, the incidence of anastomotic leak was increased after surgery in nonostomate patients (OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12, 0.57; p = 0.0009). Two studies reported no significant difference in the length of operation time when nonstomal compared to stomal operations in patients with rectal cancer (mean difference, 0.87; 95% CI, -2.99, 4.74; p = 0.66). No significant difference was found in the rate of wound infection and operation time after operation among the two groups, but the incidence of anastomosis leak increased after operation. Protective ileostomy after laparoscopic rectal cancer was effective in reducing the risk of anastomotic leakage in patients, and we found no additional risk of infection. We cautiously conclude that protective ileostomy is active and necessary for patients with a high risk of anastomotic leakage after surgery, which needs to be further confirmed by high-quality studies with larger samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Yang
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wenjin Zhong
- Department of Clinical LaboratoryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wenji Xu
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Zhongxin Huang
- Department of PathologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Suqin Cai
- Department of PathologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Wen Chen
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| | - Baogen Zhang
- Department of Traditional Chinese MedicineThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical UniversityQuanzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Shah MF, Nasir IUI, Ahmad R, Ahmad S, Amjad A, Zaineb KB, Rehman R. Short-Term Outcomes of First 100 Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries at a Newly Developed Surgical Setup at Peshawar. Cureus 2024; 16:e53588. [PMID: 38449997 PMCID: PMC10915358 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.53588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has risen steadily, necessitating innovative strategies for diagnosis and treatment. Minimally invasive surgery, exemplified by laparoscopic techniques, has emerged as a transformative approach in colorectal surgical practices. Laparoscopy offers advantages such as improved aesthetic outcomes, reduced post-operative pain, early patient mobilization, and shorter hospital stays. OBJECTIVE This study aims to present the short-term surgical outcomes of the first 100 elective laparoscopic CRC resections performed at a newly established tertiary care cancer center in Peshawar, Pakistan. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data were prospectively collected for CRC resections performed between April 2021 and February 2022. The study included patients above 18 years of age with biopsy-proven CRC. Surgical procedures were performed by two dedicated colorectal surgeons trained in minimally invasive surgery. Patient demographics, pre-operative factors, intraoperative parameters, and post-operative outcomes were systematically recorded and analyzed. RESULTS Among the 100 cases included in the study, laparoscopic colorectal surgeries were successfully performed without any conversions to open surgery. The mean age of the study population was 52.5 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. The majority of cases were colon (48%) and anorectal cancers (52%). The mean lymph node yield was 18.29 (range 6-49). Only one patient required a re-look laparoscopy for a pelvic hematoma, and overall mortality was reported at 1%. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is a safe and effective treatment option for elective colorectal operations with minimal post-operative complications and favorable short-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad F Shah
- Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Irfan Ul Islam Nasir
- Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Riaz Ahmad
- Colorectal Surgery, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Sajjad Ahmad
- Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Aalia Amjad
- Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Khush Bakht Zaineb
- Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Romana Rehman
- Medicine, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Peshawar, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Cawich SO, Plummer JM, Griffith S, Naraynsingh V. Colorectal resections for malignancy: A pilot study comparing conventional vs freehand robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:488-494. [PMID: 38322459 PMCID: PMC10841952 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i3.488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic colectomy is widely accepted as a safe operation for colorectal cancer, but we have experienced resistance to the introduction of the FreeHand® robotic camera holder to augment laparoscopic colorectal surgery. AIM To compare the initial results between conventional and FreeHand® robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy in Trinidad and Tobago. METHODS This was a prospective study of outcomes from all laparoscopic colectomies performed for colorectal carcinoma from November 29, 2021 to May 30, 2022. The following data were recorded: Operating time, conversions, estimated blood loss, hospitalization, morbidity, surgical resection margins and number of nodes harvested. All data were entered into an excel database and the data were analyzed using SPSS ver 20.0. RESULTS There were 23 patients undergoing colectomies for malignant disease: 8 (35%) FreeHand®-assisted and 15 (65%) conventional laparoscopic colectomies. There were no conversions. Operating time was significantly lower in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (95.13 ± 9.22 vs 105.67 ± 11.48 min; P = 0.045). Otherwise, there was no difference in estimated blood loss, nodal harvest, hospitalization, morbidity or mortality. CONCLUSION The FreeHand® robot for colectomies is safe, provides some advantages over conventional laparoscopy and does not compromise oncologic standards in the resource-poor Caribbean setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamir O Cawich
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Joseph Martin Plummer
- Department of General Surgery and Consultant General and Colorectal Surgeon, Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, Kingston, KIN7, Jamaica
| | - Sahle Griffith
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Bridgetown, Barbados
| | - Vijay Naraynsingh
- Department of Surgery, Port of Spain General Hospital, Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Zhou XC, Ke FY, Dhamija G, Viroja RD, Huang CW. Application of metal stent implantation with endoscope and X-ray fluoroscopy combined laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute left hemicolon cancer obstruction. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:331. [PMID: 37865772 PMCID: PMC10589989 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03228-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to conduct a case-control study of endoscopic and fluoroscopic metal stent placement combined with laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open Hartmann's procedure in treating acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. Additionally, the study aims to discuss the application value of endoscopic and X-ray-guided metal stent placement combined with laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. METHODS From June 2011 to December 2019, 23 patients with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction who underwent metal stent implantation combined with laparoscopic surgery under endoscopy and X-ray fluoroscopy in Wenzhou Central Hospital were collected, and 20 patients with acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction who underwent traditional emergency open Hartmann's surgery during the same period were selected as a control group. All patients were diagnosed with left colon obstruction by plain abdominal film and/or CT before the operation and colon adenocarcinoma by colonoscopic biopsy and/or postoperative pathology. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative anal exhaust time, the success rate of one-stage anastomosis, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS This study showed a significant difference in the therapeutic effect between the two groups. Compared with the traditional Hartmann's operation group, the success rate of one-stage anastomosis in endoscopic and X-ray-guided metal stent placement combined with the laparoscopic operation group was significantly higher than that in the Hartmann's operation group (P < 0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications and hospital stay were significantly lower in the observation group than in the Hartmann's group (P < 0.05). Further subgroup analysis of the overall postoperative complication rate of the two groups showed that the traditional Hartmann's operation group was more likely to have an incomplete intestinal obstruction (P < 0.05). This study also showed no significant differences between the two groups in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of harvested lymph nodes, and postoperative anal exhaust time (all P > 0.05). This study also found no significant differences between the two groups in overall survival rates or recurrence-free survival rates (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The comparison of the therapeutic effects of the two groups verified the feasibility of endoscopy combined with X-ray fluoroscopy metal stent placement in combination with laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of acute left-sided colon cancer obstruction. Compared with the traditional emergency open Hartmann's procedure, metal stent implantation under endoscopy and X-ray fluoroscopy combined with laparoscopic surgery is more minimally invasive, safe, and effective. It avoids the traditional second or even third surgical trauma to effectively improve the quality of life of patients, so that patients can recover quickly after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Cong Zhou
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Dingli Clinical Institute of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou Central Hospital), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei-Yue Ke
- Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou Central Hospital), Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Gaurav Dhamija
- School of International Studies, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruchi D Viroja
- School of International Studies, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China
| | - Chun-Wei Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Dingli Clinical Institute of Wenzhou Medical University (Wenzhou Central Hospital), No.252, Baili East Road, 325000, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Li R, Zhou J, Zhao S, Sun Q, Wang D. Propensity matched analysis of robotic and laparoscopic operations for mid-low rectal cancer: short-term comparison of anal function and oncological outcomes. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2339-2350. [PMID: 37402961 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01656-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023]
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer, while in some respects equivalent or even preferable to open surgery, is challenged in specific conditions where the tumor is located in the middle and lower third of the rectum. Robotic surgery equipped with a superior arm of machinery and gained better visualization can compensate for the deficiency of the laparoscopic approach. This study adopted a propensity matched analysis to compare the functional and oncological short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic surgery. All patients who underwent proctectomy have been collected prospectively between December 2019 and November 2022. After censoring for inclusion criteria, we performed a propensity matching analysis. A detailed collection of post-operative examination indicators was performed, while the K-M survival curves were plotted to analyze post-operative oncology outcomes. The LARS scale was designed to evaluate the anal function of patients in the form of questionnaires. Totally, 215 patients underwent robotic operations while 1011 patients selected laparoscopic operations. Patients matched 1∶1 by propensity score were divided into the robotic and laparoscopic groups, 210 cases were included in each group. All patients underwent a follow-up for a median period of 18.3 months. Robotic surgery was connected with an enhanced recovery including the earlier time to first flatus passage without ileostomy (P = 0.050), the earlier time to liquid diet without ileostomy (P = 0.040), lower incidence of urinary retention (P = 0.043), better anal function 1 month after LAR without ileostomy (P < 0.001), longer operative time (\P = 0.042), compared with laparoscopic operations. The oncological outcomes and occurrence of other complications were comparable between the two approaches. For mid-low rectal cancer, robotic surgery could be recognized as an effective technique with identical short-term outcomes of oncology and better anal function in comparison to laparoscopic surgery. However, multi-center studies with larger samples are expected to validate the long-term outcomes of robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruiqi Li
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Jiajie Zhou
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China
| | - Qiannan Sun
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China
- Yangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Clinical Transformation of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Yangzhou, China
| | - Daorong Wang
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Clinical Teaching Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
- Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital, Yangzhou, China.
- Yangzhou Key Laboratory of Basic and Clinical Transformation of Digestive and Metabolic Diseases, Yangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Ishii Y, Ochiai H, Sako H, Watanabe M. Long-term oncological outcome of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (single-incision plus one port) as a technical option for rectal cancer. Asian J Endosc Surg 2023; 16:687-694. [PMID: 37365007 DOI: 10.1111/ases.13222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to clarify the oncological safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (single-incision plus one port) (RPS) for patients with rectal cancer. METHODS The clinicopathological data of 63 selected patients with clinical Stage I-III (T1-3 and N0-2) rectal cancer who underwent RPS of radical anterior resection between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The median distance of tumor from anal verge was 11 cm. Ordinarily, a multiport platform with three channels was placed in the 3-cm umbilical incision, and another 5- or 12-mm port was placed in the right lower abdomen. RESULTS The median operative time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, number of harvested lymph nodes, and length of distal margin were 272 min, 10 mL, 22 nodes, and 4.0 cm, respectively, and there was one (2%) patient with involvement of the radial margin. There were eight patients (13%) who required additional ports, and one patient (2%) who converted to open surgery. Intra- and postoperative complications occurred in one (2%) and 12 patients (19%), respectively. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 8 days. The median follow-up period was 79 months, and incisional hernia was observed in 3 (5%) patients at the platform site not the port site, and cancer recurrence occurred in four patients (6%). The 5-year relapse-free and overall survival rates were 100% and 100% in the patients with pathological Stage I disease, 94% and 100% in the patients with pathological Stage II disease, and 83% and 89% in the patients with pathological Stage III disease, respectively. CONCLUSION RPS in the selected patients with rectal cancer, performed by an expert laparoscopic surgeon, may be technically safe and oncologically acceptable as well as multiport laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiyuki Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan
| | - Hiroki Ochiai
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Sako
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Watanabe
- Department of Surgery, Kitasato University Kitasato Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Chok AY, Zhao Y, Chen HLR, Tan IEH, Chew DHW, Zhao Y, Au MKH, Tan EJKW. Elderly patients over 80 years undergoing colorectal cancer resection: Development and validation of a predictive nomogram for survival. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:892-905. [PMID: 37342856 PMCID: PMC10277950 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgery remains the primary treatment for localized colorectal cancer (CRC). Improving surgical decision-making for elderly CRC patients necessitates an accurate predictive tool.
AIM To build a nomogram to predict the overall survival of elderly patients over 80 years undergoing CRC resection.
METHODS Two hundred and ninety-five elderly CRC patients over 80 years undergoing surgery at Singapore General Hospital between 2018 and 2021 were identified from the American College of Surgeons – National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Prognostic variables were selected using univariate Cox regression, and clinical feature selection was performed by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. A nomogram for 1- and 3-year overall survival was constructed based on 60% of the study cohort and tested on the remaining 40%. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration plots. Risk groups were stratified using the total risk points derived from the nomogram and the optimal cut-off point. Survival curves were compared between the high- and low-risk groups.
RESULTS Eight predictors: Age, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, serum albumin level, distant metastasis, emergency surgery, postoperative pneumonia, and postoperative myocardial infarction, were included in the nomogram. The AUC values for the 1-year survival were 0.843 and 0.826 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The AUC values for the 3-year survival were 0.788 and 0.750 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. C-index values of the training cohort (0.845) and validation cohort (0.793) suggested the excellent discriminative ability of the nomogram. Calibration curves demonstrated a good consistency between the predictions and actual observations of overall survival in both training and validation cohorts. A significant difference in overall survival was seen between elderly patients stratified into low- and high-risk groups (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION We constructed and validated a nomogram predicting 1- and 3-year survival probability in elderly patients over 80 years undergoing CRC resection, thereby facilitating holistic and informed decision-making among these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | | - Ivan En-Howe Tan
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | | - Yue Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Singapore
| | - Marianne Kit Har Au
- Group Finance, Singapore Health Services, Singapore 168582, Singapore
- Singhealth Community Hospitals, Singapore 168582, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Walshaw J, Huo B, McClean A, Gajos S, Kwan JY, Tomlinson J, Biyani CS, Dimashki S, Chetter I, Yiasemidou M. Innovation in gastrointestinal surgery: the evolution of minimally invasive surgery-a narrative review. Front Surg 2023; 10:1193486. [PMID: 37288133 PMCID: PMC10242011 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1193486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive (MI) surgery has revolutionised surgery, becoming the standard of care in many countries around the globe. Observed benefits over traditional open surgery include reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, and decreased recovery time. Gastrointestinal surgery in particular was an early adaptor to both laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Within this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the evolution of minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery and a critical outlook on the evidence surrounding its effectiveness and safety. Methods A literature review was conducted to identify relevant articles for the topic of this review. The literature search was performed using Medical Subject Heading terms on PubMed. The methodology for evidence synthesis was in line with the four steps for narrative reviews outlined in current literature. The key words used were minimally invasive, robotic, laparoscopic colorectal, colon, rectal surgery. Conclusion The introduction of minimally surgery has revolutionised patient care. Despite the evidence supporting this technique in gastrointestinal surgery, several controversies remain. Here we discuss some of them; the lack of high level evidence regarding the oncological outcomes of TaTME and lack of supporting evidence for robotic colorectalrectal surgery and upper GI surgery. These controversies open pathways for future research opportunities with RCTs focusing on comparing robotic to laparoscopic with different primary outcomes including ergonomics and surgeon comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josephine Walshaw
- Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Bright Huo
- Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Adam McClean
- Department of General Surgery, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Gajos
- Emergency Medicine Department, York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom
| | - Jing Yi Kwan
- Department of General Surgery, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - James Tomlinson
- Department of Spinal Surgery, SheffieldTeaching Hospitals, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Chandra Shekhar Biyani
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Safaa Dimashki
- Department of General Surgery, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Chetter
- Academic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Hull, United Kingdom
| | - Marina Yiasemidou
- NIHR Academic Clinical Lecturer General Surgery, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom
- Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Zheng J, Zhao S, Chen W, Zhang M, Wu J. Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2023:10.1007/s10151-023-02821-2. [PMID: 37184773 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02821-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For right colon surgery, there is an increasing body of literature comparing the safety of robotic right colectomy (RRC) with laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC). The aim of the present systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the safety and efficacy of RRC versus LRC, including homogeneous subgroup analyses for extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) and intracorporeal anastomosis (IA). METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and January 2022. Length of hospital stay, operation time, rate of conversion to laparotomy, time to first flatus, number of harvested lymph nodes, estimated blood loss, rate of overall complication, ileus, anastomotic leakage, wound infection, and total costs were measured. RESULTS Forty-two studies (RRC: 2772 patients; LRC: 12,469 patients) were evaluated. Regardless of the type of anastomosis, RRC showed shorter length of hospital stay, lower rate of conversion to laparotomy, shorter time to first flatus, lower rate of overall complications, and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes compared with LRC, but longer operative time and higher total costs. In the IA subgroup, RRC had a shorter length of hospital stay, longer operative time, and lower rate of conversion to laparotomy compared with LRC, with no difference for the remaining outcomes. In the EA subgroup, RRC had a longer operative time, lower estimated blood loss, lower rate of overall complications, and higher total costs compared with LRC, with the other outcomes being similar. CONCLUSION The safety and efficacy of RRC is superior to LRC, especially when an intracorporeal anastomosis is performed. Most included articles were retrospective, offering low-quality evidence and limited conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianchun Zheng
- Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Shuai Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Nanjing University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Ming Zhang
- Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Jianxiang Wu
- Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Jiaxing: The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, Zhejiang Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Rusli SM, Choo JM, Lee TH, Piozzi GN, Cuellar-Gomez H, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim J, Kim SH. Laparoscopic D3 oncological resection in splenic flexure cancer: Technical details and its impact on long-term survival. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:431-442. [PMID: 36281503 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM The applicability of laparoscopic D3 oncological resection for splenic flexure cancer (SFC) surgery has not been fully explored due to technical difficulties and variations in surgical procedure. The aim of this work is to describe the feasibility of performing laparoscopic D3 resection in SFC and its impact on long-term survival. METHOD A retrospective study on 47 out of 52 consecutive patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colectomy for SFC from December 2006 until December 2019 at Korea University Anam Hospital was performed. Data on patients' demographic and clinical features, surgical procedures, intraoperative and postoperative complications, pathological features and follow-up were collected. Categorical data are expressed as frequencies (n) and percentages (%). Continuous data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation and median (range). The Kaplan-Meier test was used to determine the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS The median age of patients was 67.0 years (range 27-87 years) and 72.3% were men. Ten (21.3%) patients presented with an obstructing tumour and underwent an elective laparoscopic colectomy, while 68.1% of patients presented with Stage II and III disease. The conversion rate was 4.3% and the morbidity rate was 31.9%. There was one postoperative death secondary to splenic infarction and anastomotic leak leading to multi-organ failure. Four deaths occurred due to disease progression during a median follow-up of 63.8 months. The rate of recurrence was 20%, the 5-year OS was 89.6% and the 5-year PFS was 72.9%. After R0 resection, the 5-year OS was 91.5% and the 5-year DFS was 74.5%. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic D3 colectomy for SFC is feasible, with an acceptable morbidity and long-term oncological outcome when performed by highly skilled laparoscopic colorectal surgeons with knowledge of the complex anatomy around the splenic flexure. Further randomized trials should be performed to determine the advantage of laparoscopic D3 colectomy over conventional colectomy for SFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siti Mayuha Rusli
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Jeong Min Choo
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hugo Cuellar-Gomez
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Se Jin Baek
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jung Myun Kwak
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seon Hahn Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Jadid KD, Cao Y, Petersson J, Sjövall A, Angenete E, Matthiessen P. Long-term oncological outcomes for minimally invasive surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer-a population-based nationwide study with a non-inferiority design. Colorectal Dis 2023; 25:954-963. [PMID: 36762443 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
AIM The study aimed to compare 5-year overall survival in a national cohort of patients undergoing curative abdominal resection for colon cancer by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or by the open (OPEN) technique. METHODS All patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 in Sweden with pathological Union International Contre le Cancer Stages I-III colon cancer localized in the caecum, ascending colon, hepatic flexure or sigmoid colon and those who underwent curative right sided hemicolectomy, sigmoid resection or high anterior resection by MIS or OPEN were included. Patients were identified in the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry from which all data were retrieved. The analyses were performed as intention-to-treat and the relationship between surgical technique (MIS or OPEN) and overall mortality within 5 years was analysed. For the primary research question a non-inferiority hypothesis was assumed with a statistical power of 90%, a one-side type I error of 2.5% and a non-inferiority margin of 2%. For the secondary analyses, multilevel survival regression models with the patients matched by propensity scores were employed, adjusted for patient- and tumour-related variables. RESULTS A total of 11 605 pathological Union International Contre le Cancer Stages I-III patients were included with 3297 MIS (28.4%) and 8308 OPEN (71.6%) and were followed until 31 December 2020. The primary analysis demonstrated superiority for MIS compared to OPEN. The multilevel survival regression analyses confirmed that 5-year overall survival was higher in MIS with a hazard ratio of 0.874 (95% confidence interval 0.791-0.965), and if excluding pT4 the outcome was similar, with a hazard ratio of 0.847 (95% confidence interval 0.756-0.948). CONCLUSION This observational study demonstrated that MIS was favourable to OPEN with regard to 5-year overall survival. These results support the use of laparoscopic colon cancer surgery in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaveh Dehlaghi Jadid
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Yang Cao
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Josefin Petersson
- SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Region Västra Götaland, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Annika Sjövall
- Gastrointestinal Oncology and Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Eva Angenete
- SSORG-Scandinavian Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Region Västra Götaland, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Matthiessen
- Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden.,Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Comparison of robotic reduced-port and laparoscopic approaches for left-sided colorectal cancer surgery. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:698-704. [PMID: 35778241 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE The reduced-port approach can overcome the limitations of single-incision laparoscopic surgery while maintaining its advantages. Here, we compared the effects of robotic reduced-port surgery and conventional laparoscopic approaches for left-sided colorectal cancer. METHODS Between January 2015 and December 2016, the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes of 17 patients undergoing robotic reduced-port surgery and 49 patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer were compared. RESULTS The two groups were comparable in almost all outcome measures except for the distal resection margin, which was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group (P < 0.001). The between-group differences in reoperation, incisional hernia development, and overall and progression-free survival were nonsignificant; however, the total hospital cost was significantly higher in the robotic group than in the laparoscopic group (US$13779.6 ± US$3114.8 vs. US$8556.3 ± US$2056.7, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Robotic reduced-port surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer is safe and effective but more expensive with no additional benefit compared with the conventional laparoscopic approach. This observation warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Degiuli M, Ortenzi M, Tomatis M, Puca L, Cianflocca D, Rega D, Maroli A, Elmore U, Pecchini F, Milone M, La Mendola R, Soligo E, Deidda S, Spoletini D, Cassini D, Aprile A, Mineccia M, Nikaj H, Marchegiani F, Maiello F, Bombardini C, Zuolo M, Carlucci M, Ferraro L, Falato A, Biondi A, Persiani R, Marsanich P, Fusario D, Solaini L, Pollesel S, Rizzo G, Coco C, Di Leo A, Cavaliere D, Roviello F, Muratore A, D’Ugo D, Bianco F, Bianchi PP, De Nardi P, Rigamonti M, Anania G, Belluco C, Polastri R, Pucciarelli S, Gentilli S, Ferrero A, Scabini S, Baldazzi G, Carlini M, Restivo A, Testa S, Parini D, De Palma GD, Piccoli M, Rosati R, Spinelli A, Delrio P, Borghi F, Guerrieri M, Reddavid R. Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN). Surg Endosc 2023; 37:977-988. [PMID: 36085382 PMCID: PMC9944710 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09547-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) segmental resection of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) is not available, mostly due to the rarity of this tumor. This study aimed to determine the survival outcomes of MI and open treatment, and to investigate whether MI is noninferior to open procedure regarding short-term outcomes. METHODS This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all consecutive SFC segmental resections performed in 30 referral centers between 2006 and 2016. The primary endpoint assessing efficacy was the overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence rate (RR), short-term clinical outcomes (a composite of Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications and 30-day mortality), and pathological outcomes (a composite of lymph nodes removed ≧12, and proximal and distal free resection margins length ≧ 5 cm). For these composites, a 6% noninferiority margin was chosen based on clinical relevance estimate. RESULTS A total of 606 patients underwent either an open (208, 34.3%) or a MI (398, 65.7%) SFC segmental resection. At univariable analysis, OS and CSM were improved in the MI group (log-rank test p = 0.004 and Gray's tests p = 0.004, respectively), while recurrences were comparable (Gray's tests p = 0.434). Cox multivariable analysis did not support that OS and CSM were better in the MI group (p = 0.109 and p = 0.163, respectively). Successful pathological outcome, observed in 53.2% of open and 58.3% of MI resections, supported noninferiority (difference 5.1%; 1-sided 95%CI - 4.7% to ∞). Successful short-term clinical outcome was documented in 93.3% of Open and 93.0% of MI procedures, and supported noninferiority as well (difference - 0.3%; 1-sided 95%CI - 5.0% to ∞). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with SFC, the minimally invasive approach met the criterion for noninferiority for postoperative complications and pathological outcomes, and was found to provide results of OS, CSM, and RR comparable to those of open resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Degiuli
- University of Turin, Department of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, Div of Surgical Oncology, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. .,Department of Oncology, Head Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, University of Torino, San Luigi University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10 Orbassano, 10043, Turin, Italy.
| | - Monica Ortenzi
- grid.411490.90000 0004 1759 6306Clinica Chirurgica Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mariano Tomatis
- grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580BSIT, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Lucia Puca
- grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580University of Turin, Department of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, Div of Surgical Oncology, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Desiree Cianflocca
- grid.413179.90000 0004 0486 1959Department of Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy ,grid.432329.d0000 0004 1789 4477Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela Rega
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Annalisa Maroli
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo Elmore
- grid.15496.3f0000 0001 0439 0892Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Pecchini
- grid.7548.e0000000121697570Unita’ Operativa di chirurgia generale, d’urgenza e nuove tecnologie, OCSAE, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Endoscopic Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Roberta La Mendola
- grid.415200.20000 0004 1760 6068General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Erica Soligo
- grid.415230.10000 0004 1757 123XS.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Simona Deidda
- grid.7763.50000 0004 1755 3242Chirurgia Coloproctologica-AOU Cagliari, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Domenico Spoletini
- grid.416628.f0000 0004 1760 4441UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Piazzale dell’Umanesimo, 10, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Diletta Cassini
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale, P.O. SSG, ASST NORD MILANO, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Aprile
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michela Mineccia
- grid.414700.60000 0004 0484 5983Department of General and Oncological Surgery, ”Umberto I” Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Herald Nikaj
- grid.412824.90000 0004 1756 8161SCDU Clinica Chirurgica, General Surgery Department, AOU “Maggiore Della Carità” Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Francesco Marchegiani
- grid.5608.b0000 0004 1757 3470Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fabio Maiello
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Cristina Bombardini
- Department of Surgical Morphology and Experimental Medicine, AOU Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Michele Zuolo
- General Surgery Division, “Valli del Noce” Hospital, Cles, Provincial Agency for Health Services (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Michele Carlucci
- grid.18887.3e0000000417581884Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Falato
- General Surgery Unit, San Leonardo Hospital, ASL-NA3sud, Castellammare di Stabbia, Naples, Italy
| | - Alberto Biondi
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Persiani
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daniele Fusario
- grid.9024.f0000 0004 1757 4641UOC General and Oncological Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- grid.415079.e0000 0004 1759 989XGeneral and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy
| | - Sara Pollesel
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Rizzo
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudio Coco
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Davide Cavaliere
- grid.414603.4Department of Surgical Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Franco Roviello
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Muratore
- Surgical Department, Edoardo Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, Italy
| | - Domenico D’Ugo
- grid.414603.4Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Bianco
- General Surgery Unit, San Leonardo Hospital, ASL-NA3sud, Castellammare di Stabbia, Naples, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy ,grid.415928.3Department of Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Paola De Nardi
- grid.4708.b0000 0004 1757 2822Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Rigamonti
- General Surgery Division, “Valli del Noce” Hospital, Cles, Provincial Agency for Health Services (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Gabriele Anania
- Department of Surgical Morphology and Experimental Medicine, AOU Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Claudio Belluco
- grid.414603.4Department of Surgical Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | - Roberto Polastri
- Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy
| | - Salvatore Pucciarelli
- grid.5608.b0000 0004 1757 3470Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Sergio Gentilli
- grid.412824.90000 0004 1756 8161SCDU Clinica Chirurgica, General Surgery Department, AOU “Maggiore Della Carità” Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- grid.414700.60000 0004 0484 5983Department of General and Oncological Surgery, ”Umberto I” Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefano Scabini
- grid.410345.70000 0004 1756 7871Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gianandrea Baldazzi
- Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale, P.O. SSG, ASST NORD MILANO, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Carlini
- grid.416628.f0000 0004 1760 4441UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Piazzale dell’umanesimo, 10, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Restivo
- grid.7763.50000 0004 1755 3242Chirurgia Coloproctologica-AOU Cagliari, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Silvio Testa
- grid.415230.10000 0004 1757 123XS.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Dario Parini
- grid.415200.20000 0004 1760 6068General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- grid.4691.a0000 0001 0790 385XDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Endoscopic Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Micaela Piccoli
- grid.7548.e0000000121697570Unita’ Operativa di chirurgia generale, d’urgenza e nuove tecnologie, OCSAE, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rosati
- grid.15496.3f0000 0001 0439 0892Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonino Spinelli
- grid.417728.f0000 0004 1756 8807Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56 Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy ,grid.452490.eDepartment of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Delrio
- Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- grid.413179.90000 0004 0486 1959Department of Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy ,grid.419555.90000 0004 1759 7675Oncological Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, 10060 Torino, Italy
| | - Marco Guerrieri
- grid.411490.90000 0004 1759 6306Clinica Chirurgica Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossella Reddavid
- grid.7605.40000 0001 2336 6580University of Turin, Department of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, Div of Surgical Oncology, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Ebrahimian S, Verma A, Sakowitz S, Olmedo MO, Chervu N, Khan A, Hawkins A, Benharash P, Lee H. Association of hospital volume with conversion to open from minimally invasive colectomy in patients with diverticulitis: A national analysis. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0284729. [PMID: 37115767 PMCID: PMC10146460 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the known advantages of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for diverticular disease, the impact of conversions to open (CtO) colectomy remains understudied. The present study used a nationally representative database to characterize risk factors and outcomes associated with CtO in patients with diverticular disease. METHODS All elective adult hospitalizations entailing colectomy for diverticulitis were identified in the 2017-2019 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Annual institutional caseloads of MIS and open colectomy were independently tabulated. Restricted cubic splines were utilized to non-linearly estimate the risk-adjusted association between hospital volumes and CtO. Additional regression models were developed to evaluate the association of CtO with outcomes of interest. RESULTS Of an estimated 110,281 patients with diverticulitis who met study criteria, 39.3% underwent planned open colectomy, 53.3% completed MIS, and 7.4% had a CtO. Following adjustment, an inverse relationship between hospital MIS volume and risk of CtO was observed. In contrast, increasing hospital open volume was positively associated with greater risk of CtO. On multivariable analysis, CtO was associated with lower odds of mortality (AOR 0.3, p = 0.001) when compared to open approach, and similar risk of mortality when compared to completed MIS (AOR 0.7, p = 0.436). CONCLUSION In the present study, institutional MIS volume exhibited inverse correlation with adjusted rates of CtO, independent of open colectomy volume. CtO was associated with decreased rates of mortality compared to planned open approach but equivalence risk relative to completed MIS. Our findings highlight the importance of MIS experience and suggest that MIS may be safely pursued as the initial surgical approach among diverticulitis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Ebrahimian
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Arjun Verma
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Sara Sakowitz
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Manuel Orellana Olmedo
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| | - Nikhil Chervu
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Aimal Khan
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Alexander Hawkins
- Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America
| | - Peyman Benharash
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Laboratories, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Paszt A, Ottlakan A, Abraham S, Simonka Z, Vas M, Maraz A, Szepes Z, Tiszlavicz L, Nyari T, Olah J, Lazar G. Clinical benefits of oral capecitabine over intravenous 5-fluorouracyl regimen in case of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer. Pathol Oncol Res 2022; 28:1610722. [PMID: 36567978 PMCID: PMC9773127 DOI: 10.3389/pore.2022.1610722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background: During the last decade, one of the most important treatment options for locally advanced, potencially resectable rectal tumours was neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery. Methods: Effects of the neoadjuvant treatment on surgical outcomes were retrospectively analysed in 185 patients with stage T2-T4 and N0-2, resectable rectal tumour among two patient groups defined by radiosensitizer agents. Group 1 (n = 94) involved radiotherapy (RT) with 50.4 Gy total dose (25 × 1.8 Gy + 3 × 1.8 Gy tumour bed boost), and intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (350 mg/m2) with leucovorin (20 mg/m2) on the 1-5 and 21-25 days, while Group 2 (n = 91) RT and orally administrated capecitabine (daily 2 × 825 mg/m2) on RT days. Surgery was carried out after 8-10 weeks. Side effects, perioperative complications, type of surgery, number of removed regional lymph nodes, resection margins and tumour regression grade (TRG) were analysed. Results: More favourable side effects were observed in Group 2. Despite the same rate of diarrhoea (Group 1 vs. Group 2: 54.3% vs. 56.0%), Grade 2-3 diarrhoea ratio was lower (p = 0.0352) after capecitabine (Group 2). Weight loss occurred in 17.0% and 2.2% (p = 0.00067), while nausea and vomiting was described in 38.3% and 15.4% (p = 0.00045) with 5-FU treatment and capecitabine respectively. Anaemia was observed in 33.0% and 22.0% (p = 0.0941). Complete tumour regression occurred in 25.3% after oral- and 13.8% after intravenous treatment (p = 0.049). Ratio of sphincter preservation was higher with laparoscopy than open surgery (72.3% vs. 39.7%) (p = 0.00001). Conclusion: The study confirms advantages of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oral capecitabine for rectal tumours, such as more favourable side effect profile and overall clinical outcome, with increased rate of complete tumour regression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attila Paszt
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary,*Correspondence: Attila Paszt,
| | - Aurel Ottlakan
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Zsolt Simonka
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Marton Vas
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Aniko Maraz
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Szepes
- 1st Department of Internal Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | | | - Tibor Nyari
- Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Judit Olah
- Department of Oncotherapy, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gyorgy Lazar
- Department of Surgery, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Zhang Y, Liu C, Nistala KRY, Chong CS. Open versus laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:2421-2430. [PMID: 36416926 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04285-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hartmann's procedure is traditionally performed in emergency situations where single-step procedures with immediate anastomosis may be unsafe. However, it can be associated with significant morbidity and low colostomy reversal rate. Whilst randomised controlled trials and a Cochrane review have reported strong evidence of laparoscopic over open colectomies, no such reviews have been performed for Hartmann's procedure. Hence, this paper aims to summarise the existing evidence to determine the efficacy of laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure over its open counterpart. METHODS Embase, Medline and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 15 November 2020 for keywords relating to 'laparoscopy' and 'Hartmann' using strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Odds ratio was estimated for dichotomous outcomes and weighted mean difference was estimated for continuous outcomes. RESULTS From the 836 articles yielded from the search strategy, 12 articles were selected for meta-analysis. Pooled analysis revealed that laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure (LHP) allows for a shorter length of stay, and a lower risk of overall surgical site infections and superficial surgical site infections. There was no significant difference in other outcomes. Single-arm analysis of LHP also showed an unprecedented high colostomy reversal rate of over 80%. CONCLUSION In clinically suitable patients, laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure has benefits over open Hartmann's procedure. Despite the selection bias of single-arm studies, LHP has reported a high stoma reversal rate of over 80%. Future well-controlled studies should be done to affirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yingjia Zhang
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Chunxi Liu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Choon Seng Chong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. .,Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Hospital, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119228, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Yoshida BY, Araujo RLC, Farah JFM, Goldenberg A. Is it possible to adopt the same oncological approach in urgent surgery for colon cancer? World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:896-906. [PMID: 36483972 PMCID: PMC9724181 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i11.896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locoregional complications may occur in up to 30% of patients with colon cancer. As they are frequent events in the natural history of this disease, there should be a concern in offering an oncologically adequate surgical treatment to these patients. AIM To compare the oncological radicality of surgery for colon cancer between urgent and elective cases. METHODS One-hundred and eighty-nine consecutive patients with non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma were studied over two years in a single institution, who underwent surgical resection as the first therapeutic approach, with 123 elective and 66 urgent cases. The assessment of oncological radicality was performed by analyzing the extension of the longitudinal margins of resection, the number of resected lymph nodes, and the percentage of surgeries with 12 or more resected lymph nodes. Other clinicopathological variables were compared between the two groups in terms of sex, age, tumor location, type of urgency, surgical access, staging, compromised lymph nodes rate, differentiation grade, angiolymphatic and perineural invasion, and early mortality. RESULTS There was no difference between the elective and urgency group concerning the longitudinal margin of resection (average of 6.1 in elective vs 7.3 cm in urgency, P = 0.144), number of resected lymph nodes (average of 17.7 in elective vs 16.6 in urgency, P = 0.355) and percentage of surgeries with 12 or more resected lymph nodes (75.6% in elective vs 77.3% in urgency, P = 0.798). It was observed that the percentage of patients aged 80 and over was higher in the urgency group (13.0% in elective vs 25.8% in urgency, P = 0.028), and the early mortality was 4.9% in elective vs 15.2% in urgency (P = 0.016, OR: 3.48, 95%CI: 1.21-10.06). Tumor location (P = 0.004), surgery performed (P = 0.016) and surgical access (P < 0.001) were also different between the two groups. There was no difference in other clinicopathological variables studied. CONCLUSION Oncological radicality of colon cancer surgery may be achieved in both emergency and elective procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Yuki Yoshida
- Department of Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04024-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Sao Paulo State Employee Hospital, Sao Paulo 04029-000, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Raphael L C Araujo
- Department of Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04024-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - José Francisco M Farah
- Department of Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04024-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Sao Paulo State Employee Hospital, Sao Paulo 04029-000, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alberto Goldenberg
- Department of Surgery, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo 04024-002, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Wang LM, Jong BK, Liao CK, Kou YT, Chern YJ, Hsu YJ, Hsieh PS, Tsai WS, You JF. Comparison of short-term and medium-term outcomes between intracorporeal anastomosis and extracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic left hemicolectomy. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:270. [PMID: 36030250 PMCID: PMC9419322 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02735-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated the feasibility and safety of intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) for left hemicolectomy. Here, we aimed to investigate the potential advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with IA and compare the short- and medium-term outcomes between IA and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 133 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic left hemicolectomies from July 2016 to September 2019 and categorized them into the IA and EA groups. Patients with stage 4 disease and conversion to laparotomy or those lost to follow-up were excluded. Postoperative outcomes between IA and EA groups were compared. Short-term outcomes included postoperative pain score, bowel function recovery, complications, duration of hospital stay, and pathological outcome. Medium outcomes included overall survival and disease-free survival for at least 2 years. RESULTS After excluding ineligible patients, the remaining 117 underwent IA (n = 40) and EA (n = 77). The IA group had a shorter hospital stay, a shorter time to tolerate liquid or soft diets, and higher serum C-reactive protein level on postoperative day 3. There was no difference between two groups in operative time, postoperative pain, specimen length, or nearest margin. A 2-year overall survival (IA vs. EA: 95.0% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.747) and disease-free survival (IA vs. EA: 97.5% vs. 90.9%, p = 0.182) rates were comparable between two groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic left hemicolectomy with IA was technically feasible, with better short-term outcomes, including shorter hospital stays and shorter time to tolerate liquid or soft diets. The IA group had higher postoperative serum C-reactive protein level; however, no complications were observed. Regarding medium-term outcomes, the overall survival and disease-free survival rates were comparable between IA and EA procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ming Wang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Bor-Kang Jong
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Kai Liao
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Ting Kou
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Jong Chern
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Jen Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Shiu Hsieh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Sy Tsai
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fu You
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 5, Fuxing Street, Guishan District, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Cawich SO, Singh Y, Naraynsingh V, Senasi R, Arulampalam T. Freehand-robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Initial experience in the Trinidad and Tobago. World J Surg Proced 2022; 12:1-7. [DOI: 10.5412/wjsp.v12.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is still developing in the Anglophone Caribbean, having been first performed in the region in the year 2011. We report the initial outcomes using a robot camera holder to assist in laparoscopic colorectal operations.
AIM To report our initial experience using the FreeHand® robotic camera holder (Freehand 2010 Ltd., Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom) for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in Trinidad & Tobago.
METHODS We retrospectively collected data from all patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resections using the Freehand® (Freehand 2010 Ltd., Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom) robotic camera holder between September 30, 2021 and April 30, 2022. The following data were recorded: patient demographics, robotic arm setup time, operating time, conversions to open surgery, conversions to a human camera operator, number and duration of intra-operative lens cleaning. At the termination of the operation, before operating notes were completed, the surgeons were administered a questionnaire recording information on ergonomics, user-difficulty, requirement to convert to a human camera operator and their ability to carry out effective movements to control the robot while operating.
RESULTS Nine patients at a mean age of 58.9 ± 7.1 years underwent colorectal operations using the FreeHand robot: Right hemicolectomies (5), left hemicolectomy (1), sigmoid colectomies (2) and anterior resection (1). The mean robot docking time was 6.33 minutes (Median 6; Range 4-10; SD ± 1.8). The mean duration of operation was 122.33 ± 78.5 min and estimated blood loss was 113.33 ± 151.08 mL. There were no conversions to a human camera holder. The laparoscope was detached from the robot for lens cleaning/defogging an average of 2.6 ± 0.88 times per case, with cumulative mean interruption time of 4.2 ± 2.15 minutes per case. The mean duration of hospitalization was 3.2 ± 1.30 days and there were no complications recorded. When the surgeons were interviewed after operation, the surgeons reported that there were good ergonomics (100%), with no limitation on instrument movement (100%), stable image (100%) and better control of surgical field (100%).
CONCLUSION Robot-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible and safe in the resource-poor Caribbean setting, once there is appropriate training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shamir O Cawich
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Yardesh Singh
- Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of the West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Vijay Naraynsingh
- Department of Surgery, University of the West Indies, St Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago
| | - Ramdas Senasi
- Department of Surgery, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Trust, South Shields NE34 0PL, United Kingdom
| | - Tan Arulampalam
- Department of General Surgery, Colchester Hospital University National Health Services Foundation Trust, Colchester, Essex, England, Colchester CO4 5JL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Hou J, Zhao R, Cai T, Beaulieu-Jones B, Seyok T, Dahal K, Yuan Q, Xiong X, Bonzel CL, Fox C, Christiani DC, Jemielita T, Liao KP, Liaw KL, Cai T. Temporal Trends in Clinical Evidence of 5-Year Survival Within Electronic Health Records Among Patients With Early-Stage Colon Cancer Managed With Laparoscopy-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2218371. [PMID: 35737384 PMCID: PMC9227003 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Temporal shifts in clinical knowledge and practice need to be adjusted for in treatment outcome assessment in clinical evidence. Objective To use electronic health record (EHR) data to (1) assess the temporal trends in treatment decisions and patient outcomes and (2) emulate a randomized clinical trial (RCT) using EHR data with proper adjustment for temporal trends. Design, Setting, and Participants The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group Trial assessing overall survival of patients with stages I to III early-stage colon cancer was chosen as the target trial. The RCT was emulated using EHR data of patients from a single health care system cohort who underwent colectomy for early-stage colon cancer from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2017, and were followed up to January 1, 2020, from Mass General Brigham. Analyses were conducted from December 2, 2019, to January 24, 2022. Exposures Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy (LAC) vs open colectomy (OC). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival. To address confounding in the emulation, pretreatment variables were selected and adjusted. The temporal trends were adjusted by stratification of the calendar year when the colectomies were performed with cotraining across strata. Results A total of 943 patients met key RCT eligibility criteria in the EHR emulation cohort, including 518 undergoing LAC (median age, 63 [range, 20-95] years; 268 [52%] women; 121 [23%] with stage I, 165 [32%] with stage II, and 232 [45%] with stage III cancer; 32 [6%] with colon adhesion; 278 [54%] with right-sided colon cancer; 18 [3%] with left-sided colon cancer; and 222 [43%] with sigmoid colon cancer) and 425 undergoing OC (median age, 65 [range, 28-99] years; 223 [52%] women; 61 [14%] with stage I, 153 [36%] with stage II, and 211 [50%] with stage III cancer; 39 [9%] with colon adhesion; 202 [47%] with right-sided colon cancer; 39 [9%] with left-sided colon cancer; and 201 [47%] with sigmoid colon cancer). Tests for temporal trends in treatment assignment (χ2 = 60.3; P < .001) and overall survival (χ2 = 137.2; P < .001) were significant. The adjusted EHR emulation reached the same conclusion as the RCT: LAC is not inferior to OC in overall survival rate with risk difference at 5 years of -0.007 (95% CI, -0.070 to 0.057). The results were consistent for stratified analysis within each temporal period. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that confounding bias from temporal trends should be considered when conducting clinical evidence studies with long time spans. Stratification of calendar time and cotraining of models is one solution. With proper adjustment, clinical evidence may supplement RCTs in the assessment of treatment outcome over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jue Hou
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel Zhao
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Tianrun Cai
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Brett Beaulieu-Jones
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Thany Seyok
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kumar Dahal
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Qianyu Yuan
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xin Xiong
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Clara-Lea Bonzel
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - David C. Christiani
- Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Katherine P. Liao
- Division of Rheumatology, Inflammation, and Immunity, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Tianxi Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Subramaniam A, Wengritzky R, Skinner S, Shekar K. Colorectal Surgery in Critically Unwell Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2022; 35:244-260. [PMID: 35966378 PMCID: PMC9374534 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
A proportion of patients require critical care support following elective or urgent colorectal procedures. Similarly, critically ill patients in intensive care units may also need colorectal surgery on occasions. This patient population is increasing in some jurisdictions given an aging population and increasing societal expectations. As such, this population often includes elderly, frail patients or patients with significant comorbidities. Careful stratification of operative risks including the need for prolonged intensive care support should be part of the consenting process. In high-risk patients, especially in setting of unplanned surgery, treatment goals should be clearly defined, and appropriate ceiling of care should be established to minimize care that is not in the best interest of the patient. In this article we describe approaches to critically unwell patients requiring colorectal surgery and how a multidisciplinary approach with proactive intensive care involvement can help achieve the best outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Subramaniam
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care, The Bays Healthcare, Mornington, Victoria, Australia
| | - Robert Wengritzky
- Department of Anaesthesia, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stewart Skinner
- Department of Surgery, Peninsula Health, Frankston, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kiran Shekar
- Adult Intensive Care Services, the Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Queensland University of Technology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Vogelsang RP, Fransgaard T, Falk Klein M, Gögenur I. Long-term oncological outcomes in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer: A nationwide cohort study. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:439-448. [PMID: 34905273 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
AIM To estimate the effect of laparoscopy versus laparotomy on recurrence status in patients undergoing intended curative resection for stage I-III colon cancer using nationwide data. METHOD A retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected nationwide quality assurance data on all patients undergoing elective, intended curative surgery for UICC stage I-III colon cancer in Denmark from 1 January 2010, through 31 December 2013. The association between laparoscopic versus open surgery and recurrence status was investigated using cause-specific hazard and subdistribution hazard models with death from any cause as a competing event. RESULTS In total, 4369 patients undergoing elective intended curative surgery for colon cancer were included in the analysis. Overall, 3243 (74.2%) patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. During a median follow-up time of 84 months, 1191 (27.2%) patients experienced recurrence, and 1304 (29.8%) patients died. The cause-specific hazard of recurrence following laparoscopic versus open surgery was HRCS = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.90-1.28, p = 0.422. The subdistribution hazard of recurrence following laparoscopic versus open surgery was HRSD =0.99, 95% CI: 0.84-1.16, p = 0.880. CONCLUSION Elective laparoscopic resection for UICC stage I-III colon cancer is oncologically safe and comparable with open resection. These results confirm the external validity of previous RCTs in everyday clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tina Fransgaard
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark
| | - Mads Falk Klein
- Department of Surgery, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Department of Surgery, Center for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Koege, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Ceresoli M, Pisano M, Abu-Zidan F, Allievi N, Gurusamy K, Biffl WL, Tebala GD, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Kluger Y, Baiocchi G, Coccolini F. Minimally invasive surgery in emergency surgery: a WSES survey. World J Emerg Surg 2022; 17:18. [PMID: 35300708 PMCID: PMC8932166 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00419-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in emergency surgery still represents a developing challenge. Evidence about the use of minimally invasive surgery shows its feasibility and safety; however, the diffusion of these techniques is still poor. The aims of the present survey were to explore the diffusion and variations in the use of minimally invasive surgery among surgeons in the emergency setting. METHODS This is a web-based survey administered to all the WSES members investigating the diffusion of minimally invasive surgery in emergency. The survey investigated personal characteristics of participants, hospital characteristics, personal confidence in the use of minimally invasive surgery in emergency, limitations in the use of it and limitations to prosecute minimally invasive surgery in emergency surgery. Characteristics related to the use of minimally invasive surgery were studied with a multivariate ordinal regression. RESULTS The survey collected a total of 415 answers; 42.2% of participants declared a working experience > 15 years and 69.4% of responders worked in tertiary level center or academic hospital. In primary emergencies, only 28,7% of participants declared the use of laparoscopy in more than 50% of times. Personal confidence with minimally invasive techniques was the highest for appendectomy and cholecystectomy. At multivariate ordinal regression, a longer professional experience, the use of laparoscopy in major elective surgery and bariatric surgery expertise were related to a higher use of laparoscopy in emergency surgery. CONCLUSIONS The survey shows that minimally invasive techniques in emergency surgery are still underutilized. Greater focus should be placed on the development of dedicated training in laparoscopy among emergency surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Ceresoli
- General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, Milano-Bicocca University, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, Italy.
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fikri Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Niccolò Allievi
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Kurinchi Gurusamy
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Therapy, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - Walt L Biffl
- Scripps Medical Group, La Jolla, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni D Tebala
- Consultant Colorectal, Laparoscopic and Emergency Surgeon, Oxford University Hospitals NHSFT John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, OX3 9DU, Oxford, UK
| | - Fausto Catena
- General and Emergency Surgery Dept. Bufalini Hospital, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- General and Emergency Surgery, IRCCS San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Massimo Sartelli
- General and Emergency Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| | - Yoram Kluger
- General Surgery, Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa, Israel
| | - Gianluca Baiocchi
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Cremona; University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Tschann P, Lechner D, Girotti PNC, Adler S, Rauch S, Presl J, Jäger T, Schredl P, Mittermair C, Szeverinski P, Clemens P, Weiss HG, Emmanuel K, Königsrainer I. Incidence and risk factors for umbilical incisional hernia after reduced port colorectal surgery (SIL + 1 additional port)-is an umbilical midline approach really a problem? Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1241-1249. [PMID: 35066629 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-021-02416-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Umbilical midline incisions for single incision- or reduced port laparoscopic surgery are still discussed controversially because of a higher rate of incisional hernia compared to conventional laparoscopic techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate incidence and risk factors for incisional hernia after reduced port colorectal surgery. METHODS A total 241 patients underwent elective reduced port colorectal surgery between 2014 and 2020. Follow-up was achieved through telephone interview or clinical examination. The study collective was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS A total of 150 patients with complete follow-up were included into this study. Mean follow-up time was 36 (IQR 24-50) months. The study collective consists of 77 (51.3%) female and 73 (48.7%) male patients with an average BMI of 26 kg/m2 (IQR 23-28) and an average age of 61 (± 14). Indication for surgery was diverticulitis in 55 (36.6%) cases, colorectal cancer in 65 (43.3%) patients, and other benign reasons in 30 (20.0%) cases. An incisional hernia was observed 9 times (6.0%). Obesity (OR 5.8, 95% CI 1.5-23.1, p = 0.02) and pre-existent umbilical hernia (OR 161.0, 95% CI 23.1-1124.5, p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for incisional hernia in the univariate analysis. Furthermore, pre-existent hernia is shown to be a risk factor also in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION We could demonstrate that reduced port colorectal surgery using an umbilical single port access is feasible and safe with a low rate of incisional hernia. Obesity and pre-existing umbilical hernia are significant risk factors for incisional hernia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tschann
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria.
| | - Daniel Lechner
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Paolo N C Girotti
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Stephanie Adler
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Stephanie Rauch
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Schredl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christof Mittermair
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Philipp Szeverinski
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.,Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein
| | - Patrick Clemens
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Helmut G Weiss
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Carinagasse 47, A-6800, Feldkirch, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Horsey ML, Lai D, Sparks AD, Herur-Raman A, Borum M, Rao S, Ng M, Obias VJ. Disparities in utilization of robotic surgery for colon cancer: an evaluation of the U.S. National Cancer Database. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:1299-1306. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
|
30
|
Hajirawala LN, Krishnan V, Leonardi C, Bevier-Rawls ER, Orangio GR, Davis KG, Klinger AL, Barton JS. Minimally Invasive Surgery is Associated with Improved Outcomes Following Urgent Inpatient Colectomy. JSLS 2022; 26:JSLS.2021.00075. [PMID: 35281708 PMCID: PMC8896814 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2021.00075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The use of minimally invasive techniques for urgent colectomies remains understudied. This study compares short-term outcomes following urgent minimally invasive colectomies to those following open colectomies. Methods & Procedures The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) colectomy database was queried between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018. Patients who underwent elective and emergency colectomies, based on the respective NSQIP variables, were excluded. The remaining patients were divided into two groups, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and open. MIS colectomies with unplanned conversion to open were included in the MIS group. Baseline characteristics and 30-day outcomes were compared using univariable and multivariable regression analyses. Results A total of 29,345 patients were included in the study; 12,721 (43.3%) underwent MIS colectomy, while 16,624 (56.7%) underwent open colectomy. Patients undergoing MIS colectomy were younger (60.6 vs 63.8 years) and had a lower prevalence of either American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) IV (9.9 vs 15.5%) or ASA V (0.08% vs 2%). After multivariable analysis, MIS colectomy was associated with lower odds of mortality (odds ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.61, 0.91 95% confidence interval), and most short-term complications recorded in the ACS NSQIP. While MIS colectomies took longer to perform (161 vs 140 min), the length of stay was shorter (12.2 vs 14.1 days). Conclusions MIS colectomy affords better short-term complication rates and a reduced length of stay compared to open colectomy for patients requiring urgent surgery. If feasible, minimally invasive colectomy should be offered to patients necessitating urgent colon resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luv N Hajirawala
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Varun Krishnan
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Claudia Leonardi
- School of Public Health, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Elyse R Bevier-Rawls
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Guy R Orangio
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Kurt G Davis
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Aaron L Klinger
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Schietroma M, Romano L, Apostol AI, Vada S, Necozione S, Carlei F, Giuliani A. Mid- and low-rectal cancer: laparoscopic vs open treatment-short- and long-term results. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:71-99. [PMID: 34716474 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-04048-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The laparoscopic approach in the treatment of mid- or low-rectal cancer is still controversial. Compared with open surgery, laparoscopic resection of extraperitoneal cancer is associated with improved short-time non-oncological outcomes, although high-level evidence showing similar short- and long-term oncological outcomes is scarce. OBJECTIVE The aim of our paper is to study the oncological and non-oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. DATA SOURCES A systematic review of MedLine, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from January 1990 to October 2020 was performed by combining various key words. STUDY SELECTION Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer were included. The quality of RCTs was assessed using the Cochrane reviewer's handbook. This meta-analysis was based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. INTERVENTION(S) This study analyzes laparoscopic versus open surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary outcomes were oncological parameters. RESULTS Fifteen RCTs comprising 4,411 patients matched the selection criteria. Meta-analysis showed a significant difference between laparoscopic and open surgery in short-time non-oncological outcomes. Although laparoscopic approach increased operation time, it decreases significantly the blood loss and length of hospital stay. No significant difference was noted regarding short- and long-term oncological outcomes, but 4 and 5 years disease-free survival were statistically higher in the open group. LIMITATIONS There are still questions about the long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for extraperitoneal rectal cancer being comparable to the open technique. CONCLUSIONS Considering that all surgical resections have been performed in high volume centers by expert surgeons, the minimally invasive surgery in patients with extraperitoneal cancer could still be not considered equivalent to open surgery in terms of oncological radicality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Schietroma
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Lucia Romano
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | - Adriana Ionelia Apostol
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Silvia Vada
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Stefano Necozione
- Epidemiology Unit, Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Francesco Carlei
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Antonio Giuliani
- Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Science, General Surgery, University of L'Aquila, San Salvatore Hospital, Coppito (AQ), 67100, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Rawat S, Selvasekar C, Bansal S. Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy for Colorectal Cancers: Concepts and Current Results. RECENT CONCEPTS IN MINIMAL ACCESS SURGERY 2022:155-192. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-5473-2_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
|
|
33
|
Saito S, Akagi T, Katayama H, Wakabayashi M, Inomata M, Yamamoto S, Ito M, Kinugasa Y, Egi H, Munakata Y, Kokuba Y, Bando H, Yasui M, Ikeda M, Nakajima K, Shida D, Kanemitsu Y, Kitano S, the Colorectal Cancer Study Group of Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Identification of patient subgroups with unfavorable long-term outcomes associated with laparoscopic surgery in a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0404). Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2021; 5:804-812. [PMID: 34755012 PMCID: PMC8560616 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously, we conducted a randomized controlled trial (JCOG0404) for stage II/III colon cancer patients and reported that the long-term survival after open surgery (OP) and laparoscopic surgery (LAP) were almost identical; however, JCOG0404 suggested that survival of patients after LAP with tumors located in the rectosigmoid colon, cT4 or cN2 tumors, and high body mass index (BMI) might be unfavorable. AIM To identify the patient subgroups associated with poor long-term survival in the LAP arm compared with the OP arm. METHODS Patients aged 20-75, clinical T3 or deeper lesion without involvement of other organs, clinical N0-2 and M0 were included. The patients with pathological stage IV and R2 resection were excluded from the current analysis. In each subgroup, the hazard ratio for LAP (vs. OP) in overall survival (OS) from surgery was estimated using a multivariable Cox regression model adjusted for the clinical and pathological factors. RESULTS In total, 1025 patients (OP, 511 and LAP, 514) were included in the current analysis. Adjusted hazards ratios for OS of patients with high BMI (>25 kg/m2), pT4, and pN2 in LAP were 3.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-9.19), 1.33 (0.73-2.41), and 1.74 (0.76-3.97), respectively. In contrast, that of rectosigmoid colon tumors was 0.98 (0.46-2.09). CONCLUSIONS Although LAP is an acceptable optional treatment for stage II/III colon cancer, the present subgroup analysis suggests that high BMI (>25 kg/m2), pT4, and pN2 except for RS were factors associated with unfavorable long-term outcomes of LAP in patients with colon cancer who underwent curative resection. (JCOG 0404: NCT00147134/UMIN-CTR: C000000105.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuji Saito
- Division of SurgeryGastrointestinal CenterYokohama Shin‐Midori General HospitalYokohamaJapan
| | - Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita University Faculty of MedicineOitaJapan
| | - Hiroshi Katayama
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations OfficeNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Masashi Wakabayashi
- Japan Clinical Oncology Group Data Center/Operations OfficeNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryOita University Faculty of MedicineOitaJapan
| | | | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
| | - Yusuke Kinugasa
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Egi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical OncologyEhime University Graduate School of MedicineEhimeJapan
| | | | - Yukihito Kokuba
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgerySt. Marianna University Yokohama Seibu HospitalYokohamaJapan
| | - Hiroyuki Bando
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryIshikawa Prefectural Central HospitalKanazawaJapan
| | - Masayoshi Yasui
- Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryOsaka International Cancer InstituteOsakaJapan
| | - Masataka Ikeda
- Division of Lower Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Gastroenterological SurgeryHyogo College of MedicineNishinomiyaJapan
| | | | - Dai Shida
- Division of Frontier SurgeryThe Institute of Medical ScienceThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
| | - Yukihide Kanemitsu
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Keller DS, Jenkins CN. Safety with Innovation in Colon and Rectal Robotic Surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:273-279. [PMID: 34504400 PMCID: PMC8416332 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1726352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Robotic colorectal surgery has been touted as a possible way to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery and has shown promise in rectal resections, thus shifting traditional open surgeons to a minimally invasive approach. The safety, efficacy, and learning curve have been established for most colorectal applications. With this and a robust sales and marketing model, utilization of the robot for colorectal surgery continues to grow steadily. However, this disruptive technology still requires standards for training, privileging and credentialing, and safe implementation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah S. Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California at Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Christina N. Jenkins
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Trauma Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, California
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Rubin DS, Huisingh-Scheetz M, Ferguson MK, Nagele P, Peden CJ, Lauderdale DS. U.S. trends in elective and emergent major abdominal surgical procedures from 2002 to 2014 in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:2220-2230. [PMID: 33969889 PMCID: PMC8373714 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The U.S. population is aging and projected to undergo an increasing number of general surgical procedures. However, recent trends in the frequency of major abdominal procedures in older adults are currently unknown as improvements in non-operative interventions may obviate the need for major surgery. Thus, we evaluated the trends of major abdominal surgical procedures in older adults in the United States. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2014 with trend analysis using National Cancer Institute's Joinpoint Trend Analysis Software. We identified the average annual percent change (AAPC) in the yearly frequency of major abdominal surgical procedures in older adults (≥50 years of age). RESULTS Our cohort included a total of 3,951,947 survey-weighted discharges that included a major abdominal surgery in adults ≥50 years of age between 2002 and 2014. Of these discharges, 2,529,507 (64.0%) were for elective abdominal surgeries, 2,062,835 (52.0%) were for female patients, and mean (SD) age was 61.4 (15.9) years. The frequency of major abdominal procedures (elective and emergent) decreased for adults aged 65-74 (AAPC: -1.43, -1.75, -1.11, p < 0.0001), 75-84 (AAPC: -2.75, -3.33, -2.16, p < 0.001), and ≥85 (AAPC: -4.07, -4.67, -3.47, p < 0.0001). The AAPC for elective procedures decreased for older adults aged 75-84 (AAPC = -1.65; -2.44, -0.85: p = 0.0001) and >85 (AAPC = -3.53; -4.57, -2.48: p < 0.0001). All age groups showed decreases in emergent procedures in 50-64 (AAPC = -1.76, -2.00, -1.52, p < 0.0001), 65-74 (AAPC = -3.59, -4.03, -3.14, p < 0.0001), 75-84 (AAPC = -3.90, -4.34, -3.46, p < 0.0001), ≥85 (AAPC = -4.58, -4.98, -4.17, p < 0.0001) age groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort of older adults, the frequency of emergent and elective major abdominal procedures in adults ≥65 years of age decreased with significant variation among individual procedure types. Future studies are needed to identify the generalizability of our findings to other surgical procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Rubin
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Megan Huisingh-Scheetz
- Section of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mark K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Peter Nagele
- Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Carol J Peden
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Diane S Lauderdale
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Linderman GC, Lin W, Sanghvi MR, Becher RD, Maung AA, Bhattacharya B, Davis KA, Schuster KM. Improved outcomes using laparoscopy for emergency colectomy after mitigating bias by negative control exposure analysis. Surgery 2021; 171:305-311. [PMID: 34332782 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is superior to open surgery for elective colectomy, but its role in emergency colectomy remains unclear. Previous studies were small and limited by confounding because surgeons may have selected lower-risk patients for laparoscopy. We therefore studied the effect of attempting laparoscopy for emergency colectomies while adjusting for confounding using multiple techniques in a large, nationwide registry. METHODS Using National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, we identified emergency colectomy cases from 2014 to 2018. We first compared outcomes between patients who underwent laparoscopic versus open surgery, while adjusting for baseline variables using both propensity scores and regression. Next, we performed a negative control exposure analysis. By assuming that the group that converted to open did not benefit from the attempt at laparoscopy, we used the observed benefit to bound the effect of unmeasured confounding. RESULTS Of 21,453 patients meeting criteria, 3,867 underwent laparoscopy, of which 1,375 converted to open. In both inverse probability of treatment weighting and regression analyses, attempting laparoscopy was associated with improved 30-day mortality, overall morbidity, anastomotic leak, surgical site infection, postoperative septic shock, and length of hospital stay compared with open surgery. These effects were consistent with the lower bounds computed from the converted group. CONCLUSION Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal emergencies appears to improve outcomes compared with open surgery. The benefit is observed even after adjusting for both measured and unmeasured confounding using multiple statistical approaches, thus suggesting a benefit not attributable to patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George C Linderman
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Applied Mathematics Program, Department of Mathematics, Yale University, New Haven, CT. https://twitter.com/GCLinderman
| | - Winston Lin
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Mansi R Sanghvi
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Robert D Becher
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Adrian A Maung
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Kimberly A Davis
- Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. https://twitter.com/kadtraumamd
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Shah MF, Naeem A, Haq IU, Riaz S, Shakeel O, Panteleimonitis S, Khattak S, Syed AA, Parvaiz A. Laparoscopy Offers Better Clinical Outcomes and Long-term Survival in Patients With Right Colon Cancer: Experience From National Cancer Center. Ann Coloproctol 2021; 38:223-229. [PMID: 34167186 PMCID: PMC9263301 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2021.00045.0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Laparoscopic approach to colonic tumor requires skill set and resources to be established as routine standard of care in most centers around the world. It presents particular challenge in country like Pakistan due to economic constrain and lack of teaching and training opportunities available for surgeons to be trained to deliver such service. The aim of this study is to look into changing practice of our institution from conventional approach of open to laparoscopic surgery for right colon cancer. Methods Consecutive patients between January 2010 to December 2018 who presented to Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre with diagnosis of right colon (cecum, ascending and transverse colon) adenocarcinoma and underwent surgical resections were included in this study. Results A total of 230 patients with adenocarcinoma of the right colon underwent curative resections during the study period. Of these, 141 patients (61.3%) underwent laparoscopic surgery while open resection was performed in 89 patients (38.7%). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III (80.9% vs. 54.8%, P = 0.021) was significantly better if these patients underwent laparoscopic surgery while a trend toward better DFS (96.7% vs. 84.1%, P = 0.111) was also observed in AJCC stage II patients, although this difference was not significant. Conclusion This study demonstrates the adoption of a laparoscopic approach for right colon cancer over 10 years. With a standardized approach and using the principle of oncological surgery, we incorporated this in our minimally invasive surgery practice at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Fahd Shah
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Awais Naeem
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Ihtisham Ul Haq
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Shehryar Riaz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Osama Shakeel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Sofoklis Panteleimonitis
- Department of Surgery, School of Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
| | - Shahid Khattak
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Aamir Ali Syed
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Amjad Parvaiz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan.,Department of Surgery, School of Health and Care Professions, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.,Department of Surgery, Poole Hospital NHS Trust, Poole, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Is newer always better?: comparing cost and short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic right hemicolectomy. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2879-2885. [PMID: 34129087 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08579-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enthusiasm is high for expansion of robotic assisted surgery into right hemicolectomy. But data on outcomes and cost is lacking. Our objective was to determine the association between surgical approach and cost for minimally invasive right hemicolectomy. We hypothesized that a robot approach would have increased costs (both economic and opportunity) while achieving similar short-term outcomes. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort analysis with a simulation of operating room utilization at a quaternary care, academic institution. We enrolled patients undergoing minimally invasive right hemicolectomy from November 2017 to August 2019. Patients were categorized by the intended approach- laparoscopic or robotic. The primary outcome was the technical variable direct cost. Secondary outcomes included total cost, supply cost, operating room utilization, operative time, conversion, length of stay and 30-day post-operative outcomes. RESULTS 79 patients were included in the study. A robotic approach was used in 22% of the cohort. The groups differed significantly only in etiology of surgery. Robotic surgery was associated with a 1.5 times increase in the technical variable direct cost (p < 0.001), increased supply cost (2.6 times; p < 0.001) and increased total cost (1.3 times; p < 0.001). Significant differences were observed in median room time (Robotic: 285 min vs. Laparoscopic: 170 min; p < 0.001) and procedure time (Robotic: 203 min vs. Laparoscopic: 118 min; p < 0.001). There were no differences observed in post-operative outcomes including length of stay or readmission. In a simulation of OR utilization, 45 laparoscopic right hemicolectomies could be performed in an OR in a month compared to 31 robotic cases. CONCLUSIONS Robotic right hemicolectomy was associated with increased costs with no improvement in post-operative outcomes. In a simulation of operating room efficiency, a robotic approach was associated with 14 fewer cases per month. Practitioners and administrators should be aware of the increased cost of a robotic approach.
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Ueda K, Daito K, Ushijima H, Yane Y, Yoshioka Y, Tokoro T, Iwamoto M, Wada T, Makutani Y, Kawamura J. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation for splenic flexure colon cancer: short- and long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2021; 36:2661-2670. [PMID: 34031741 PMCID: PMC8921072 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08559-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) for colon cancer is an essential procedure for improved oncologic outcomes after surgery. Laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer was recently adopted due to a greater understanding of surgical anatomy and improvements in surgical techniques and innovative surgical devices. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients with splenic flexure colon cancer who underwent laparoscopic CME with CVL at our institution between January 2005 and December 2017. Results Forty-five patients (4.8%) were enrolled in this study. Laparoscopic CME with CVL was successfully performed in all patients. The median operative time was 178 min, and the median estimated blood loss was 20 g. Perioperative complications developed in 6 patients (13.3%). The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days. According to the pathological report, the median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15, and lymph node metastasis developed in 14 patients (31.1%). No metastasis was observed at the root of the middle colic artery or the inferior mesenteric artery. The median follow-up period was 49 months. The cumulative 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were 85.9% and 84.7%, respectively. The cancer-specific survival rate in stage I-III patients was 92.7%. Recurrence was observed in 5 patients (11.1%), including three patients with peritoneal dissemination and two patients with distant metastasis. Conclusions Laparoscopic CME with CVL for splenic flexure colon cancer appears to be oncologically safe and feasible based on the short- and long-term outcomes in our study. However, it is careful to introduce this procedure to necessitate the anatomical understandings and surgeon’s skill. The appropriate indications must be established with more case registries because our experience is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuki Ueda
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
| | - Koji Daito
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Hokuto Ushijima
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Yane
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Yasumasa Yoshioka
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Tadao Tokoro
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Iwamoto
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Wada
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Yusuke Makutani
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Junichiro Kawamura
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2, Ohnohigashi, Osaka Sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Li C, Wang Q, Jiang KW. What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:391-399. [PMID: 34040700 PMCID: PMC8131907 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i5.391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancers comprise a large percentage of tumors worldwide, and transverse colon cancer (TCC) is defined as tumors located between hepatic and splenic flexures. Due to the anatomy and embryology complexity, and lack of large randomized controlled trials, it is a challenge to standardize TCC surgery. In this study, the current situation of transverse/extended colectomy, robotic/ laparoscopic/open surgery and complete mesocolic excision (CME) concept in TCC operations is discussed and a heatmap is conducted to show the evidence level and gap. In summary, transverse colectomy challenges the dogma of traditional extended colectomy, with similar oncological and prognostic outcomes. Compared with conventional open resection, laparoscopic and robotic surgery plays a more important role in both transverse colectomy and extended colectomy. The CME concept may contribute to the radical resection of TCC and adequate harvested lymph nodes. According to published studies, laparoscopic or robotic transverse colectomy based on the CME concept was the appropriate surgical procedure for TCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Quan Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| | - Ke-Wei Jiang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Laparoscopic versus Open Complete Mesocolic Excision for Right Colon Cancer. Int J Surg Oncol 2021; 2021:8859879. [PMID: 33604087 PMCID: PMC7872753 DOI: 10.1155/2021/8859879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Results The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LCME group than that in the OCME group with less mean intraoperative blood loss. Conversion was required in 4 patients (8.3%) in the LCME group. The use of laparoscopy increased the number of harvested lymph nodes compared to the open approach (39.81 ± 16.74 vs. 32.65 ± 12.28, respectively, P=0.010). The laparoscopic approach was associated with a shorter time interval to first flatus as well as shorter time interval to liquid and normal diet after surgery. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LCME group. The complication rate was slightly lower in the LCME (14.7%) than in the OCME group (27.2%) (P=0.252). The 3-year OS in the LCME group was similar to that in OCME (78.2% vs. 63.2%, respectively, P value = 0.423). The three-year DFS in the laparoscopic group was higher (74.5%) than the open group (60.0%), but did not reach statistical significance (P value = 0.266). Conclusions In conclusion, laparoscopic CME right hemicolectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure if surgeon expertise is present. LCME has long-term oncologic outcomes (recurrence and survival) comparable to open surgery for management of patients with stage II or III colon cancer.
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Udwadia TE. Training for laparoscopic colorectal surgery creating an appropriate porcine model and curriculum for training. J Minim Access Surg 2021; 17:180-187. [PMID: 33723182 PMCID: PMC8083748 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_86_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic colorectal surgery (LCRS) was first described in 1991, and its safety, efficacy and patient benefit were adequately documented in literature. However, its penetration and acceptability is poor in most countries, due to its long learning curve and lack of surgeons training and confidence. A Minimal Access Surgery (MAS) Training Center in Mumbai has over the last 7 years trained more than 8000 surgeons in various MAS specialities. The centre has initiated courses for LCRS training. Materials and Methods The anatomy of the pig colon is very different from human anatomy. The pig colon anatomy is altered to mimic human colon anatomy in the porcine abdomen, permitting hands-on practice on most laparoscopic colorectal surgical procedures, as part of the LCRS training course, under mentorship of expert faculty, who simultaneously assess participants performance. Results Each participant performs and assists for at least three procedures and is evaluated at each step of the procedure by a structured format. The overall evaluation by Faculty which though subjective, is detailed and favourable. Feedback of each participant is good and acceptable as a very helpful course. Conclusion This porcine model is ideal for hands-on training for LCRS. Participants achieve a good degree of skill level and confidence in performing LCRS procedures on fresh bleeding porcine cadaver models. The centre is factual and pragmatic and stresses that it needs more than a course to make a safe surgeon; operation room mentorship is the finishing school.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tehemton Erach Udwadia
- Center of Excellence for Minimal Access Surgery Training; Department of Surgery, Grant Medical College, Grant Medical College and J.J. Hospital; Department of Surgery, B. D. Petit Parsee General Hospital, Breach Candy Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6227-6243. [PMID: 33206242 PMCID: PMC8523463 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has profoundly changed standards of care and lowered perioperative morbidity, but its temporal implementation and factors favoring MIS access remain elusive. We aimed to comprehensibly investigate MIS adoption across different surgical procedures over 20 years, identify predictors for MIS amenability and compare propensity score-matched outcomes among MIS and open surgery. Methods Nationwide retrospective analysis of all hospitalizations in Switzerland between 1998 and 2017. Appendectomies (n = 186,929), cholecystectomies (n = 57,788), oncological right (n = 9138) and left hemicolectomies (n = 21,580), rectal resections (n = 13,989) and gastrectomies for carcinoma (n = 6606) were included. Endpoints were assessment of temporal MIS implementation, identification of predictors for MIS access and comparison of propensity score-matched outcomes among MIS and open surgery. Results The rates of MIS increased for all procedures during the study period (p ≤ 0.001). While half of all appendectomies were performed laparoscopically by 2005, minimally invasive oncological colorectal resections reached 50% only by 2016. Multivariate analyses identified older age (p ≤ 0.02, except gastrectomy), higher comorbidities (p ≤ 0.001, except rectal resections), lack of private insurance (p ≤ 0.01) as well as rural residence (p ≤ 0.01) with impaired access to MIS. Rural residence correlated with low income regions (p ≤ 0.001), which themselves were associated with decreased MIS access. Geographical mapping confirmed strong disparities for rural and low-income areas in MIS access. Matched outcome analyses revealed benefits of MIS for length of stay, decreased surgical site infection rates for MIS appendectomies and cholecystectomies and higher mortality for open cholecystectomies. No consistent morbidity or mortality benefit for MIS compared to open colorectal resections was observed. Conclusion Unequal access to MIS exists in disfavor of older and more comorbid patients and those lacking private insurance, living in rural areas, and having lower income. Efforts should be made to ensure equal MIS access regardless of socioeconomic or geographical factors. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00464-020-08123-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Yoo D, Song KB, Lee JW, Hwang K, Hong S, Shin D, Hwang DW, Lee JH, Lee W, Kwon J, Park Y, Jun E, Kim SC. A Comparative Study of Laparoscopic versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Ampulla of Vater Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2020; 9:2214. [PMID: 32668683 PMCID: PMC7408711 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Several studies have compared laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) in patients with periampullary carcinoma; however, only a few studies have made such a comparison on patients with ampulla of Vater cancer (AVC). We compared the perioperative and oncologic outcomes between LPD and OPD in patients with AVC using propensity-score-matched analysis. A total of 359 patients underwent PD due to AVC during the study period (76 LPD, 283 OPD). After propensity score matching, the LPD group showed significantly longer operation time than did the OPD group (400.2 vs. 344.6 min, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the LPD group had fewer painkiller administrations (8.3 vs. 11.1, p < 0.049), fewer Grade II or more severe postoperative complications (15.9% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.012), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (13.7 vs. 17.3 days, p = 0.048), compared with the OPD group. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free outcomes and overall survival between the two groups (p = 0.754 and 0.768, respectively). Compared with OPD, LPD for AVC had comparative oncologic outcomes with less pain, less postoperative morbidity, and shorter hospital stays. LPD may serve as a promising alternative to OPD in patients with AVC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul 05505, Korea; (D.Y.); (J.W.L.); (K.H.); (S.H.); (D.S.); (D.W.H.); (J.H.L.); (W.L.); (J.K.); (Y.P.); (E.J.); (S.C.K.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Celarier S, Monziols S, Francois MO, Assenat V, Carles P, Capdepont M, Fleming C, Rullier E, Napolitano G, Denost Q. Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial. Trials 2020; 21:216. [PMID: 32087762 PMCID: PMC7036186 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay. Methods and analysis The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Trial registration This research received the approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and was the subject of information to the ANSM. This search is saved in the ID-RCB database under registration number 2018-A03028–47. This research is retrospectively registered January 23, 2019, at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed under the name “LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)”. This trial is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Celarier
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - S Monziols
- Department of Anesthesia ans Critical Care, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - M O Francois
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - V Assenat
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - P Carles
- Department of Anesthesia ans Critical Care, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - M Capdepont
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - C Fleming
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - E Rullier
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - G Napolitano
- Department of Anesthesia ans Critical Care, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France
| | - Q Denost
- Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France. .,Department of digestive Surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Migliore M, Giuffrida MC, Marano A, Pellegrino L, Giraudo G, Barili F, Borghi F. Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy within a systematic ERAS protocol: a propensity-weighted analysis. Updates Surg 2020; 73:1057-1064. [PMID: 32086772 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00722-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to compare the early postoperative and pathological outcomes of robotic right colectomy (RRC) to those of laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) with intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) within the systematic application of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. A single-institution prospective database of patients who underwent elective RRC or LRC with IA for neoplastic lesions between April 2010 and June 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. The patients' demographic characteristics, and perioperative and pathological outcomes were analyzed. Propensity-weighted analysis was employed to address potential selection biases of treatment allocation. A total of 216 patients (46 RRC, 170 LRC) were included. RRC demonstrated a significantly longer operative time (mean 242.43 min, SD 47.51) compared to LRC (mean 187.60 min, SD 56.60) (p = 0.001), confirmed by the propensity-weighted analysis (Coefficient 50.65; p < 0.001). Conversion rate between the two groups was comparable (p = 0.99). Median length of hospital stay (LOS) was the same in the RRC and the LRC group (4 days, p = 0.35). Readmission rate within 30 days in the RRC and LRC group was 2.2% and 2.4%, respectively (p = 0.99). Overall 30-day morbidity and 30-day mortality was 32.6% versus 27.1% (p = 0.46), and 0% versus 1.2% (p = 0.99) in the robotic and laparoscopic groups, respectively. No difference was found in the number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.75). In an ERAS environment, without the bias of mixed techniques of anastomosis, RRC had similar postoperative and pathological outcomes compared to the laparoscopic approach, but was associated with a longer operative time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Migliore
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Maria Carmela Giuffrida
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marano
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Luca Pellegrino
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Giorgio Giraudo
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Fabio Barili
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Felice Borghi
- Department of Surgery, General and Oncologic Surgery Unit, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100, Cuneo, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Yuce TK, Ellis RJ, Chung J, Merkow RP, Yang AD, Soper NJ, Tanner EJ, Schaeffer EM, Bilimoria KY, Auffenberg GB. Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies. J Surg Oncol 2020; 121:620-629. [PMID: 31970787 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25841] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recent studies demonstrating decreased survival following minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for cervical cancer have generated concern regarding oncologic efficacy of MIS. Our objective was to evaluate the association between surgical approach and 5-year survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies. METHODS Patients with stage I or II adenocarcinoma of the prostate, colon, rectum, and stage IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer from 2010-2015 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base. The association between surgical approach and 5-year survival was assessed using propensity-score-matched cohorts. Distributions were compared using logistic regression. Hazard ratio for death was estimated using Cox proportional-hazard models. RESULTS The rate of deaths at 5 years was 3.4% following radical prostatectomy, 22.9% following colectomy, 18.6% following proctectomy, and 6.8% following radical hysterectomy. Open surgery was associated with worse survival following radical prostatectomy (HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.33; P = .005), colectomy (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.39-1.51; P < .001), and proctectomy (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.50; P = .002); however, open surgery was associated with improved survival following radical hysterectomy (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that MIS is an acceptable approach in selected patients with prostate, colon, and rectal cancers, while concerns regarding MIS resection of cervical cancer appear warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tarik K Yuce
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan J Ellis
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jeanette Chung
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Anthony D Yang
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Nathaniel J Soper
- Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward J Tanner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karl Y Bilimoria
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology (NICER-Onc), Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Gregory B Auffenberg
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Department of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study. Sci Rep 2020; 10:75. [PMID: 31919417 PMCID: PMC6952445 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-57059-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer has been supported by the results of randomized controlled trials. However, its benefits and disadvantages in the real world setting should be further assessed with population-based studies.The hospitalization data of patients undergoing open or laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer were sourced from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Patient and hospital characteristics and perioperative outcomes including length of hospital stay, operation time, opioid use, blood transfusion, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and use of mechanical ventilation were compared. The overall survival was also assessed. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery had shorter hospital stay (p < 0.0001) and less demand for opioid analgesia (p = 0.0005). Further logistic regression revealed that patients undergoing open surgery were 1.70, 2.89, and 3.00 times more likely to have blood transfusion, to be admitted to ICU, and to use mechanical ventilation than patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Operations performed in medical centers were also associated with less adverse events. The overall survival was comparable between the 2 groups.With adequate hospital quality and volume, laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer was associated with improved perioperative outcomes. The long-term survival was not compromised.
Collapse
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
Akagi T, Inomata M. Essential advances in surgical and adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer 2018-2019. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:39-46. [PMID: 32021957 PMCID: PMC6992683 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy are the only treatment modalities for localized colorectal cancer that can obtain a "cure." The goal in surgically treating primary colorectal cancer is complete tumor removal along with dissection of systematic D3 lymph nodes. Adjuvant treatment controls recurrence and improves the prognosis of patients after they undergo R0 resection. Various clinical studies have promoted the gradual spread and clinical use of new surgical approaches such as laparoscopic surgery, robotic surgery, and transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Additionally, the significance of adjuvant chemotherapy has been established and it is now recommended in the JSCCR (the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum) guideline as a standard treatment. Herein, we review and summarize current surgical treatment and adjuvant chemotherapy for localized colorectal cancer and discuss recent advances in personalized medicine related to adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomonori Akagi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryFaculty of MedicineOita UniversityYufu‐CityJapan
| | - Masafumi Inomata
- Department of Gastroenterological and Pediatric SurgeryFaculty of MedicineOita UniversityYufu‐CityJapan
| |
Collapse
|