Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Feb 6, 2018; 9(1): 1-7
Published online Feb 6, 2018. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i1.1
Published online Feb 6, 2018. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i1.1
Monitoring modality | Pros | Cons |
Lower endoscopy | ||
Colonoscopy | Gold standard of disease monitoring | Limited studies |
Early studies show no difference in adverse events between pregnant IBD patients who underwent colonoscopy and who did not undergo colonoscopy | Provider/patient hesitancy due to procedural and anesthetic concerns | |
Flexible sigmoidoscopy | Can be performed without sedation No case reports of any procedure-related complications | Limited studies |
Radiologic studies | ||
Ultrasound | Safest form of radiologic imaging | Sensitivity in pregnancy unknown |
Contrast-enhanced ultrasound shown to have good results in IBD | ||
Magnetic resonance imaging | No use of damaging ionizing radiation | Currently no well-controlled studies of the teratogenic effects of gadolinium contrast in pregnant women have been performed and the fetal risk is unknown |
Can detect luminal and extraluminal abnormalities | ||
Long-term safety after exposure to MRI trimester of pregnancy showed no increased risk of harm to the fetus or in early childhood | ||
Biomarkers | ||
Albumin | Low albumin shown to be predictor of poor outcomes in IBD | Limited utility in pregnancy due to pregnancy-induced hemodilution resulting in lower albumin values |
ESR | Generally a good marker of inflammation and reflects disease activity | Limited utility in pregnancy due to physiologic increase in ESR (2-3 x upper limit of normal) |
CRP | Levels are only slightly raised in normal pregnancy and are still under the normal limits | May not accurately reflect disease activity in second and third trimester |
CRP higher in clinically active pregnant IBD patients at preconception and first trimester compared to clinically inactive pregnant IBD patients | Limited studies in pregnant IBD population | |
FCP | Measure of GI mucosal inflammatory activity detected prior to signs of systemic inflammation | Conflicting evidence for utility of FCP in IBD during pregnancy |
Multiple studies showing correlation between FCP levels and non-invasive disease activity scores in CD and UC | Limited studies with actual endoscopic data to evaluate clinical activity |
- Citation: Choden T, Mandaliya R, Charabaty A, Mattar MC. Monitoring inflammatory bowel disease during pregnancy: Current literature and future challenges. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2018; 9(1): 1-7
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v9/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i1.1