Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Feb 6, 2016; 7(1): 78-90
Published online Feb 6, 2016. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v7.i1.78
Table 1 Summary of studies that have determined prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms in quiescent inflammatory bowel disease
Ref.TypeSample size (CD/UC)Criteria used to define IBD remissionExclusions (IBD characteristics or previous surgery)Criteria used to define IBSIBD-IBS prevalencen (%)
Isgar et al[1]Case-control98 (0/98)Endoscopic remission, steroid-freeNot further specifiedManningUC: 33 (33.7)
98 non-IBD controls
Simrén et al[2]Cross-sectional83 (40/43)CD: Physician global assessment, endoscopic/radiological remission and normal inflammatory markers (Hb, ESR, CRP, platelets, albumin) UC: Endoscopic remission, no blood nor mucus, normal CRPStenotic CDGastrointestinal symptom questionnaire validated37 (44.6)
CD patients with > 2 surgeriesCD: 23 (57)
UC: 14 (33)
Significant comorbidities
Zaman et al[43]Cross-sectional55 (30/25)Stable symptoms, no changes in medication for 3 moNot availableRome II35 (63.6)
CD: 20 (66.7)
UC: 15 (60)
Minderhoud et al[44]Case-control107 (34/73)CD: CDAI < 150Significant comorbiditiesManningManning: 33 (30.8)
66 non-IBD controlsUC: CAIUC < 10Rome IICD: 8 (23.5)
UC: 25 (34.2)
Rome II: 37 (34.6)
CD: 14 (41.7)
UC: 23 (31.5)
Farrokhyar et al[45]Cross-sectional149 (105/44)No changes/addition of medication nor change dosage in the last yearNot further specifiedRome II31 (20.8)
CD: 27 (26)
UC: 4 (9.1)
Ansari et al[46]Case-control50 (0/50)Mayo score ≤ 2 (bleeding score = 0, endoscopic score 0-1)Not further specifiedRome IIUC: 23 (46)
100 non-IBD controls
Keohane et al[33]Cross-sectional106 (62/44)CD: CDAI < 150Not further specifiedRome II54 (50.9)
UC: UCAI ≤ 3CD: 37 (59.7)
For both: physician’s global assessment, CRP < 10 mg/L, no use of steroids or biological agents in previous 6 moUC: 17 (38.6)
Piche et al[48]Cross-sectional92 (92/0)CDAI < 150 for > 6 mo, endoscopic/radiologic remission (CDEIS < 6), normal inflammatory markers (CRP, Hb, ESR, platelets, albumin)StenosisRome IIICD: 42 (45.7)
CD patients with previous surgery
Recent corticoid use
Barratt et al[3]Case-control276 (110/166)CD: HBI < 5Not further specifiedRome II31 (11.2)
348 non-IBD controlsUC: SCCAI < 5CD: 14 (12)
UC: 17 (9)
Bryant et al[4]Cross-sectional93 (47/43)1Physician’s global assessment using inflammatory markers, histological and endoscopic activity and clinical dataNot further specifiedRome III12 (12.9) (no CD/UC differentiation)
Jelsness-Jørgensen et al[49]Cross-sectional89 (28/61)CD: SCDAI < 4Not further specifiedRome IIRome II: 21 (23.6)
UC: SCCAI < 3Rome IIICD: 6 (21.4)
No current steroid treatmentUC: 15 (24.6)
Rome III: 30 (33.7)
CD: 8 (28.6)
UC: 22 (36.1)
Kim et al[50]Cross-sectional226 (107/119)No changes on therapy in last year, normal limits of CRP, hemoglobin, no blood or mucus in stools for UCCD with stenotic/penetrating phenotypeRome III82 (36.3)
CD: 50 (46.7)
Previous surgeryUC: 32 (26.9)
Berrill et al[5]Cross-sectional97 (40/57)CD: HBI < 5, CRP < 10 mg/LIleostomy, colostomy or total colectomyRome III31 (32)
UC: SCCAI < 3, CRP < 10 mg/LCD: 13 (32.5)
UC: 18 (31.6)
Jonefjäll et al[35]Pro-spective94 (0/94)Mayo ≤ 2 (endoscopic < 1)Significant comorbiditiesRome IIUC: 25 (27)
No relapse during 3 mo before inclusion
Vivinus-Nébot et al[51]Cross-sectional49 (31/18)CD: CDAI < 150,CDEIS ≤ 4Stenotic or complicated CDRome III18 (36.7)
UC: UCAI ≤ 3, Mayo = 0CD: 11 (35.4)
For both: physician’s global assessment, CRP < 10 mg/L, no use of steroids over the last yearSignificant comorbiditiesUC: 7 (38)
Fukuba et al[52]Case control172 (0/172)CAI ≤ 4, CRP < 5 mg/LColectomyRome IIIUC: 46 (26.7)
330 non-IBD controls
Total-1836 (726/1107)1---Total: 567 (30.9)
CD: 259 (38.1)2
UC: 296 (27.8)2
Table 2 Irritable bowel syndrome Rome III criteria
Recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort at least 3 d per month in the last 3 mo (with onset at least 6 mo prior to diagnosis) associated with two or more of the following
Relieved with defecation
Onset associated with a change in frequency of stools
Onset associated with a change in form (appearance) of stools
Table 3 Studies that explore quality of life and anxiety in inflammatory bowel disease patients in remission with irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms
Ref.Sample size (CD/UC)Questionnaires usedResults
Simrén et al[2]83 (40/43)GSRSHigher anxiety and depression scores in IBD-IBS (worst in CD)
37 IBD-IBS (23/14)HADS
STAI
PGWB
Minderhoud et al[44]107 (34/73)IBDQLower QoL scores in IBD-IBS
37 IBD-IBS (14/23)
Farrokhyar et al[45]149 (105/44)sIBDQOccurence of any FGID taken in count (not only IBS-like)
31 IBD-IBS (27/4)EQ-5DLower QoL scores in CD patients with FGID
Difference not significant for UC
Ansari et al[46]50 (0/50)SF-36Lower QoL scores in IBD-IBS than in asymptomatic and similar to patients in flare
IBD-IBS: 23 (0/23)
Keohane et al[33]106 (62/44)IBSQQoL scores only significantly lower in UC-IBS
54 IBD-IBS (37/17)HADSLevels of anxiety and depression only significantly higher in UC-IBS
Piche et al[48]92 (92/0)French-validated IBS severity scoring systemHigher severity, impact, depression and fatigue scores in CD-IBS
42 IBD-IBS (42/0)
Likert scalesNo significant differences in anxiety level
FIS
Short BDI
HADS
Barratt et al[3]276 (110/166)SF-36No differentiation between IBD patients in remission or in active phase
31 IBD-IBS (14/17)HADSLower QoL scores and higher anxiety, depression scores in IBD-IBS
Bryant et al[4]93 (47/43)sIBDQOccurrence of any FGID taken in count (not only IBS-like)
12 IBD-IBS (no CD/UC differentiation)HADSLower QoL scores and higher anxiety and depression scores in IBD patients with any FGID
BDQ-6
Lowest scores in IBS-like symptoms
Jelsness-Jørgensen et al[49]89(28/61)FQMore fatigue scores in IBD-IBS (worst in UC)
30 IBD-IBS (8/22)RFIPCMore concerns in UC-IBD (difference non significant for CD)
Kim et al[50]226 (107/119)EQ-5DOccurrence of any FGID taken in count (not only IBS-like)
82 IBD-IBS (50/32)HADSLower QoL scores and higher anxiety and depression scores in UC-IBS (difference non-significant for CD)
Berrill et al[5]97 (40/57)HADSNo differentiation between IBD patients in remission or in active phase
31 IBD-IBS (13/18)Higher anxiety and depression scores in IBD-IBS
Jonefjäll et al[35]94 (0/94)HADSLower QoL scores and higher anxiety scores in UC-IBS (difference in depression score non-significant)
25 IBD-IBS (0/25)SF-36
Vivinus-Nébot et al[51]49 (31/18)French-validated IBS severity scoring systemHigher severity and impact scores in IBD-IBS
18 IBD-IBS (11/7)