Copyright
©2011 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. Aug 6, 2011; 2(4): 27-35
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Published online Aug 6, 2011. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
Table 1 American Society of Health-System Pharmacists recommendations for stress ulcer prophylaxis
| Population | Treatment recommendations | Grade |
| Non-critically ill medical and surgical patients | Prophylaxis not recommended | B1 |
| Critically ill patients with one of the following: | ||
| Coagulopathy (i.e. platelet count of < 50 000 mm3, INR of 1.5) | Prophylaxis recommended | C |
| Mechanical ventilation for > 48 h | C | |
| History of gastrointestinal ulceration or bleeding within 1 year of admission | D | |
| Glasgow Coma score of ≤ 10 | B, D2 | |
| Thermal injury to > 35% of body surface area | B, D3 | |
| Partial hepatectomy | C, D4 | |
| Multiple trauma (injury severity score of ≥ 16) | D | |
| Hepatic or renal transplantation | D | |
| Spinal cord injury | D | |
| Hepatic failure | D | |
| Two or more of the following risk factors: sepsis, ICU stay of greater than 1 wk, occult bleeding lasting at least 6 d, and high-dose corticosteroids (> 250 mg/d of hydrocortisone or equivalent daily) | D | |
| Pediatric patients with one of the following: | ||
| Respiratory failure | Prophylaxis recommended | C |
| Coagulopathy | C | |
| Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score of ≥ 10 | C | |
| Thermal injuries | D |
Table 2 Dosage regimens for agents used for stress ulcer prophylaxis
| Medication | Adult raNGe |
| Cimetidine | 300 mg qid po, NG, or iv or 50 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
| Famotidine | 20 mg bid po, NG, or iv or 1.7 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
| Ranitidine | 150 mg bid po or NG, 50 mg every 6-8 h iv, or 6.25 mg/h by continuous iv infusion |
| Nizatidine | 150 mg bid po or NG |
| Antacids | 30-60 mL po or NG every 1-2 h |
| Sucralfate | 1 g qid po or NG |
| Omeprazole | 40 mg LD then 20-40 mg daily po, NG or iv |
| Lansoprazole | 30 mg daily po, NG or iv |
| Esomeprazole | 20-40 mg daily po, NG or iv |
| Rabeprazole | 20 mg daily po or NG |
| Pantoprazole | 40 mg daily po or NG or iv |
Table 3 General characteristics of the sample (n =1004)
| Patients characteristics | n (%) |
| Gender | |
| Males | 527 (52.5) |
| Females | 477 (47.5) |
| Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 54.6 ± 21.2 |
| Unit | |
| ICU | 142 (14.1) |
| IM | 468 (46.6) |
| Surgery | 190 (18.9) |
| CCU | 94 (9.4) |
| Pediatrics | 40 (4.0) |
| OBGYN | 28 (2.8) |
| Others | 42 (4.2) |
| Hospital stay: Median and IQR (d) | 4.0 (5.0)1 |
| Acid-suppressant drugs | |
| PPIs | 618 (61.6) |
| Omeprazole | 477 (47.5) |
| Lansoprazole | 50 (5.0) |
| Esomeprazole | 5 (0.5) |
| Rabeprazole | 86 (8.6) |
| H2-RAs | 386 (38.4) |
| Ranitidine | 384 (38.2) |
| Nizatidine | 2 (0.20) |
| Duplicate therapy | 0 (0) |
Table 4 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice
| SUP variable | n (%) |
| Indication | |
| Non-Candidates for SUP1 | 673 (67) |
| Candidates for SUP2 | 331 (33) |
| 1 major risk factor3 | 53 (25.2) |
| 2 minor risk factors4 | 204 (20.3) |
| 7 d stay in ICU and 1 minor risk factor | 38 (3.8) |
| Dose | |
| Appropriate | 891 (88.9) |
| Inappropriate | 111 (11.1) |
| Route | |
| Oral | 232 (23.2) |
| Parenteral | 770 (76.8) |
| Inappropriate5 | 551 (71.6) |
| Duration (d) | |
| Median (IQR) | 4.0 (5)6 |
| Regimen (dose + route + duration) | |
| Appropriate | 124 (12.4) |
| Inappropriate | 880 (87.6) |
Table 5 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice per indication n (%)
| SUP variable | Candidates | Non-candidates | P-value |
| Acid-suppressant drugs | |||
| PPIs | 208 (62.8) | 410 (60.9) | |
| H2-RAs | 123 (37.2) | 263 (39.1) | 0.557 |
| Dose | |||
| Appropriate | 281 (84.9) | 610 (90.0) | |
| Inappropriate | 50 (15.1) | 61 (9.1) | 0.004 |
| Route | |||
| Appropriate | 150 (45.3) | 301 (44.7) | |
| Inappropriate | 181 (54.7) | 372 (55.3) | 0.859 |
| Dose and route | |||
| Appropriate | 124 (37.5) | 265 (39.4) | |
| Inappropriate | 207 (62.5) | 408 (60.6) | 0.558 |
| Duration (d) | |||
| Median (IQR) | 5.0 (7.0) | 3.0 (4.0) | < 0.0011 |
| Discharge on SUP | |||
| Yes | 49 (28.8) | 70 (20.9) | |
| No | 121 (71.2) | 265 (79.1) | 0.047 |
Table 6 Assessment of stress ulcer prophylaxis practice per hospital type n (%)
| SUP variable | Teaching | Non-teaching | P-value |
| Indication | |||
| Candidates | 153 (37.8) | 178 (29.7) | |
| Non-candidates | 252 (62.2) | 421 (70.3) | 0.008 |
| Dose | |||
| Appropriate | 350 (86.4) | 541 (90.6) | |
| Inappropriate | 55 (13.6) | 56 (9.4) | 0.038 |
| Route | |||
| Appropriate | 206 (50.9) | 245 (40.9) | |
| Inappropriate | 199 (49.1) | 354 (59.1) | 0.002 |
| Dose and route | |||
| Appropriate | 178 (44.0) | 211 (35.2) | |
| Inappropriate | 227 (56.0) | 388 (64.8) | 0.005 |
| Acid-suppressant drugs | |||
| PPIs | 266 (65.7) | 352 (58.8) | |
| H2-RAs | 139 (34.3) | 247 (41.2) | 0.027 |
| Duration (d) | |||
| Median (IQR)1 | 5 (10) | 3 (3.75) | < 0.0011 |
| Discharge on SUP | |||
| Yes | 53 (26.2) | 66 (21.8) | |
| No | 149 (73.8) | 237 (78.2) | 0.248 |
- Citation: Zeitoun A, Zeineddine M, Dimassi H. Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2011; 2(4): 27-35
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5349/full/v2/i4/27.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27
