BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Borozan S, Jena S, Nagendra L, Dutta D, Bhattacharya S, Islam MS, Pappachan JM. Safety and efficacy of efruxifermin in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2025; 16(3): 110709 [PMID: 40937291 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v16.i3.110709]
Reader's ID:
03769692
Submitted on:
September 09, 2025, 11:03
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
EFX, a fibroblast growth factor 21 analogue, shows promising potential for improving liver fat, liver injury markers, fibrosis, and several metabolic parameters in individuals with MASH. The paper offers significant insights, especially given the limited therapeutic options available for MASH. From a clinical standpoint, the review highlights the dual benefits of EFX in addressing both liver and metabolic dysfunctions, including improvements in hepatic fat content, liver enzymes, fibrosis markers, and insulin resistance. The finding that EFX significantly reduces liver fat while improving metabolic outcomes such as HbA1c and triglycerides is particularly relevant in the management of MASH, which often coexists with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. In conclusion, this review emphasizes EFX’s potential as a promising treatment for MASH, particularly in managing both hepatic and metabolic dysfunctions. This paper is a timely contribution to the field, providing a comprehensive understanding of EFX's role in MASH management.
Reply from the Editorial Office:
Thank you very much for your comments.
Author's Reply:
Replied on September 09, 2025, 18:49
Thanks for your comments and appreciation. Best wishes, JM Pappachan