Vonoprazan (Voquezna®) is a potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB) with improved pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties compared with proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) that allow for stronger control of gastric acid with once-daily oral administration and no requirement to be taken in relation to timing of meals for optimal efficacy. In the USA, vonoprazan has been approved as a first-in-class treatment for healing and maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis, and for relief of heartburn in adult patients with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). In pivotal phase III trials, vonoprazan was non-inferior to the PPI lansoprazole in healing and superior to lansoprazole in maintenance of healing of erosive esophagitis, and was superior to placebo for treating heartburn in US patients with non-erosive GERD. Vonoprazan was generally well tolerated; the most common adverse events included abdominal pain, constipation, diarrhea, nausea, and dyspepsia. Vonoprazan is, therefore, a valuable addition to the therapies available for adults with erosive esophagitis and non-erosive GERD.

As antibiotic resistance continues to rise, the development of novel H. pylori treatment regimens, combined with regular assessment of existing treatment regimens, is imperative. The study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and compliance of vonoprazan dual and triple therapy (VDT and VTT) both consisting of vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin/clavulanate 875 mg/125 three times daily plus clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily added in VTT versus standard triple therapy (STT), in which vonoprazan 20 mg in VTT is replaced by PPI standard or double dose all for 14 days, along with investigating factors influencing compliance, treatment response, and symptoms severity. By per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of the STT, VDT, and VTT groups were 70%, 76.2%, and 79.2%, respectively (p = 0.777) indicating suboptimal efficacy of the three treatment regimens. This necessitates the optimization of dosage and frequency of available treatment regimens as well as the development of new regimens with higher eradication rates. Interestingly, the VDT group demonstrated a better safety profile but with no statistically significant difference in cure rate. No difference in compliance with treatment was found between the groups. Gender, frequency of COVID-19 vaccination, height, and BMI were the only factors assessed influencing infection symptoms severity. ClinicalTrial.gov ID identifier: NCT05614934, first posted date (07/11/2022).

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) constitute a relatively new class of gastric acid-suppressing drugs. Among this class, vonoprazan is the first to have been approved in the United States. However, some P-CABs including vonoprazan, tegoprazan, and fexuprazan have been available in other countries since at least 2014. The first aim of this article is to review pharmacological differences between P-CABs that are currently approved or in development with proton pump inhibitors. The specific focus thereafter is on the likely role of P-CABs in the treatment of different manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Multiple clinical trials have compared P-CABs with proton pump inhibitors in erosive esophagitis. Additional trials have compared P-CABs with placebo in nonerosive reflux disease. Relevant results are reviewed, and inferences are drawn for their use in the United States. Finally, consideration is given to additional, potential uses of P-CABs in the broader spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease, and some suggestions are made for future research initiatives.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the drug of choice to prevent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT); however, unmet needs remain. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are novel acid-suppressive drugs that have emerged as potential alternatives. We evaluated the effectiveness of P-CAB in reducing the risk of UGI bleeding in patients receiving DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

This retrospective cohort study included patients with PCI on DAPT between January 2019 and January 2023 using the Korean nationwide health claims database. The primary outcome was admission for UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to evaluate UGI bleeding risk based on PPIs and P-CAB use.

Of the 210 447 patients who underwent PCI on DAPT (mean age, 65.5 years; 74.7% men), 4.6% and 47.5% patients were prescribed P-CABs and PPIs, respectively. Overall, 0.3% of patients experienced UGI bleeding within 6 months of PCI. P-CAB users had a reduced risk of UGI bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.92; p = 0.019) compared with patients not receiving P-CAB or PPI. No significant difference was observed between the P-CAB and PPI users (p > 0.05).

Among Korean patients undergoing PCI with DAPT, P-CABs reduced UGI bleeding comparably to PPIs. These findings suggest that P-CABs are potential alternatives to PPIs for preventing UGI bleeding.

In order to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of high-dose dual therapy with vonoprazan for eradicating Helicobacter pylori, we searched seven electronic databases from the establishment of the database to March 2025, collecting randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing high-dose dual therapy with vonoprazan to high-dose dual therapy with PPI and quadruple therapy with bismuth, including 13 RCTs with 4023 patients. The primary outcome is the eradication rate determined based on intention to treat analysis and protocol analysis, while secondary outcomes include incidence of adverse events and compliance. According to ITT analysis and PP treatment analysis, the eradication rates of VA therapy were 88.81 % and 93.56 %, respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower (14.56 % vs 26.00 %, RR=0.57, 95 % CI: 0.48-0.67, p < 0.0001), and compliance was better (96.29 % vs 93.56 %, RR=1.03, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.05, p = 0.003), making it a reliable alternative therapy.

In gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), both vonoprazan alone and intravenous proton pump inhibitor (PPI) followed by vonoprazan have lower delayed bleeding risk than PPI alone. This study aimed to clarify an optimal acid-suppressive method in gastric ESD.

This population-based cohort study included patients who underwent gastric ESD on only vonoprazan (vonoprazan alone group) or intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan (intravenous PPI group) using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was delayed bleeding. To balance the two comparison groups, propensity score matching (PSM), based on 18 variables, was performed; subsequently, to compare the bleeding outcome, logistic regression analysis was performed.

Of 63,952 patients, 24,710 pairs were compared following PSM. The delayed bleeding risk in the vonoprazan alone group was similar to that in the intravenous PPI group (odds ratio [OR], 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.08; delayed bleeding rate, 5.9% vs. 5.9%). The results were consistent in some sensitivity and subgroup analyses; however, the result was modified by the status of antithrombotic agents (p for interaction = 0.029). In additional analyses, in patients with antithrombotic agent, the vonoprazan alone group had a higher delayed bleeding risk than the intravenous PPI group (OR, 1.15).

Both vonoprazan alone and intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be acceptable in gastric ESD when antithrombotic agents were not administered, whereas intravenous PPI followed by vonoprazan might be favorable in patients with antithrombotic agents.

This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy in comparison to bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) for patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection.

Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) were searched published from establishment of database to June 1, 2024, for articles studying VA dual therapy compared to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection. Meta-analyses of eradication rates, adverse events, compliance and cost were preformed.

A total of 17 studies were included for meta-analysis. Compared with BQT, VA increased the incidence of H. pylori eradication rate, with significant difference under the ITT analysis (86.9% vs. 80.4%, RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.12, p = 0.01) but there no significant difference under the PP analysis (90.7% vs. 86.5%, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.08, p = 0.13). Besides, VA significantly increased compliance (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p < 0.01) and decreased the occurrence of total adverse events (27.0% vs. 11.5%, RR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.37-0.51, p < 0.01). Furthermore, VA has lower cost compared to BQT.

Our findings indicated that VA dual therapy provided a higher eradication rate, enhanced compliance, decreased adverse events, and lowered cost relative to BQT for patients with H. pylori infection.

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024576738, identifier CRD42024576738 (PROSPERO).

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay treatment for gastric ulcer (GU) for over 30 years. However, since the discovery of a new class of acid suppressants, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), the desire for a therapeutic agent has continued and the clinical trials on P-CABs have been conducted. In this regard, we aimed to assess whether P-CABs are noninferior to PPIs in patients with GU in terms of efficacy.

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Additionally, we used a new methodology of inference concept with the purpose of grouping between P-CABs and PPIs. Moreover, our quality management system was integrated throughout the research to ensure data accuracy.

We initially screened 438 studies and extracted 10 homogeneous GU RCTs with 6315 participants. The odds ratios (ORs) for the 4-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, tegoprazan 100 mg (OR = 4.14, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.56-26.3) and pantoprazole 40 mg (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 1.90-8.88) were the largest, respectively. The ORs for the 8-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 8.77, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.95-78.9) and lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 7.91, 95% CI 2.60-24.03) was the largest, respectively.

The results of the NMA reveal that the cure rates of P-CABs in cases of GU were not inferior to those of PPIs. As the inference by grouping PPIs and P-CABs, the results showed similar trends in terms of effectiveness between the two therapeutic classes.

To explore the current research status and trends of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the treatment of acid related diseases (ARDs) using bibliometric analysis.

We collected publications related to P-CAB in the treatment of acid-related diseases in the Web of Science (WOS) Core Collection from the establishment of the database to 30 June 2024. We evaluated the publication volume and citation status over the years using the WOS platform, and visualized the authors, countries, institutions, keywords, and citations of the publications using CiteSpace and VOSviewer.

This study included a total of 455 articles. The number of publications and citations related to research has been increasing year by year. The results show that the scholars with the highest number of publications mainly come from South Korea and Japan. Scholars such as Geun Seog Song, Bongtae Kim, and Nobuhiro Inatomi produced many works in related fields. The most popular drug in this field was vonoprazan, and research on this drug mainly focused on the effectiveness and safety evaluation of ARDs such as Helicobacter pylori infection, gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcers, etc. Researchers were concerned about the evaluation of treatment regimens and efficacy comparison between P-CABs and traditional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the treatment of ARDs. At the same time, researchers are also closely monitoring the potential adverse reactions and long-term adverse outcomes of clinical application of P-CABs for ARDs.

The clinical application of P-CABs, represented by vonoprazan, in ARDs is receiving widespread attention from researchers. The exploration of the application of this type of drug in ARDs is constantly expanding, and it is a research field with great clinical value and research potential.

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) whose symptoms improve with acid-suppression therapy, on-demand treatment could constitute maintenance therapy. This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of on-demand tegoprazan and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in GERD. From six university hospitals in the Daejeon-Chungcheong region, we enrolled patients with GERD who had experienced symptomatic improvement with acid-suppressive therapy and, using a randomization table, randomly allocated these participants to two groups: to receive either tegoprazan 50 mg + esomeprazole placebo or tegoprazan placebo + esomeprazole 20 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint of this study was the intergroup difference in patient satisfaction with on-demand therapy. Among the 69 participants who completed 8 weeks of on-demand therapy and rated patient satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale, the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups scored an average of 4.31 and 4.15 points, respectively, without any significant intergroup difference. In the tegoprazan group, 26.2% (182/694) of those with episodes experienced symptom improvement within 30 min, which is a significantly higher proportion compared to 16.1% (104/646) in the esomeprazole group. Compared to the esomeprazole group, the tegoprazan group had a significantly shorter time to symptom improvement overall and a significantly higher proportion of patients who improved within 30 min. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Tegoprazan is effective as on-demand therapy for GERD and offers the expectation of faster symptom improvement than with PPIs. Clinical trial KCT0009296, registered at cris.nih.go.kr.

The aims of this study were to confirm the non-inferiority of tegoprazan to lansoprazole up to week 4 in patients with erosive esophagitis (EE) and to evaluate its effectiveness in rapid mucosal healing and symptom relief at week 2.

In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-comparator non-inferiority trial, 218 patients with endoscopically confirmed EE (Los Angeles Classification Grades A-D) were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan (50 mg) or lansoprazole (30 mg) group. The primary endpoint was the cumulative proportion of patients with healed EE up to week 4, as confirmed through endoscopy. The proportion of patients with healed EE at week 2 was also evaluated. Furthermore, CYP2C19 genotypes, symptoms, safety, and tolerability were assessed.

In the full-analysis set, 103 and 109 participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, were analyzed. The cumulative healing rates up to week 4 were 95.2% (98/103) and 86.2% (94/109) (difference [95% confidence interval], 8.91 [1.22-16.59]; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and 0.0266 for superiority), while those at week 2 were 88.4% (91/103) and 82.6% (90/109) (5.78 [-3.66-15.22], p = 0.0005 for non-inferiority) for tegoprazan and lansoprazole, respectively. Tegoprazan showed consistent healing rates regardless of CYP2C19 genotypes.

Tegoprazan was superior to lansoprazole in the treatment of EE up to 4 weeks. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and clarify the superiority of tegoprazan, especially in the treatment of severe EE.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05267743.

Effective suppression of gastric acid secretion promotes healing of erosive esophagitis. Treatment guidelines recommend proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs). Emerging evidence also supports potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). The aim was to construct a mathematical model to examine the relationship between pH holding time ratios (HTRs) and erosive esophagitis healing rates with H2RAs, PPIs and P-CABs. By literature search, we identified studies of H2RAs, PPIs or P-CABs that reported mean pH >4 HTRs at steady state (days 5-8) and erosive esophagitis healing rates after 4 and/or 8 weeks. We aggregated treatments by drug class and developed a non-linear, mixed-effects model to explore the relationship between pH >4 HTRs and healing rates. The pH dataset included 82 studies (4297 participants; 201 dosage arms); healing rate data came from 103 studies (43,417 patients; 196 treatment arms). P-CABs achieved the longest periods with intragastric pH >4, and the highest healing rates after 4 and 8 weeks. The predicted probabilities of achieving ≥90% healing rates at 8 weeks were 74.1% for P-CABs, 17.3% for PPIs and 0% for H2RAs. P-CABs provide the longest duration with intragastric pH >4 and, accordingly, the highest healing rates of erosive esophagitis.

Acid-related disorders represent a significant global health burden. Pharmacological treatment of these conditions has at times been challenged and limited by incomplete effectiveness, antibiotic resistance, adverse medication effects and/or interactions, and disease recurrence. Since the early 1990s, the mainstay of treatment has been proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a clearance for vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB). PCABs are a new class of acid-suppressing agents that may overcome some of these challenges. The aim of this review is to evaluate and compare the emerging long-term risks of PPI and PCAB therapies.

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the first-line treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, due to their intrinsic limitations, there are still unmet clinical needs that have fostered the development of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs). Currently, four different drugs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan, and keverprazan) are marketed in some Asian countries, whereas only vonoprazan and tegoprazan are available in Western countries (USA and Brazil or Mexico, respectively).

This review summarizes the current knowledge on P-CABs acute and long-term safety in GERD treatment compared to that of PPIs. Full-text articles and abstracts were searched in PubMed.

P-CABs proved to address some of the unmet clinical needs in GERD, with a favorable risk-benefit ratio compared to conventional PPIs. Preclinical and clinical findings have highlighted P-CAB safety to be superimposable, to that of PPIs, in short-term treatments, although further studies are warranted to monitor their effects in long-term therapy. From an epidemiological point of view, the paucity of rigorous data for many variables (e.g. age, ethnicity, drug interactions, comorbidities, genetic polymorphisms, interindividual susceptibility, and gut dysbiosis) deserves a worldwide framework of continuous pre/post-marketing pharmacovigilance programs to reduce potential confounding factors and accurately link acute and chronic P-CAB therapy to adverse outcomes.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common debilitating chronic disease presenting in two main forms based on esophageal mucosal appearance, the erosive reflux disease (ERD) and the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). Acid secretion is a key factor in the disease pathogenesis and management. Potent acid-suppressant drugs have been manufactured since the mid of 1970s, initially with histamine-H2-receptors antagonists, and later, inhibitors of the proton pump (H+-K+-ATPase).More recently, potassium-competitive acid blockers (p-CABs), particularlyVonoprazan, have been introduced. Vonoprazan has shown high efficacy and safety profiles and exhibits several advantages that allow to overcome shortcomings of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

In this review, we provide an updated summary of Vonoprazan pharmacodynamics and its role in clinical practice for the management of erosive esophagitis and GERD-related heartburn. Moreover, we discuss characteristics of Vonoprazan that allow to bypass some limitations of the older PPIs.

Long-term safety and efficacy of Vonoprazan have already been demonstrated for the induction and maintenance of ERD, preventing nocturnal acid breakthrough, reducing reflux symptoms in non-responder to standard therapy. Ongoing and future studies are expected to further elucidate its long-term benefits and potential applications in other acid-related disorders.

Only a few studies have investigated the efficacy and safety of different durations of vonoprazan and amoxicillin (VA) high-dose dual therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 days versus 14 days of VA high-dose dual therapy for H. pylori eradication.

This study was conducted in 14 centers in China. A total of 250 patients infected with H. pylori were randomly assigned to Group VA-10 or VA-14. Both groups received the VA dual therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily). The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary endpoints included adverse events and patient compliance.

Group VA-10 achieved eradication rates of 89.60%, 91.06%, and 91.67% as determined by the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified intention-to-treat (MITT), and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. The eradication rates were similar to those in Group VA-14: 91.20%, 93.44%, and 93.39%. The difference and 90% confidence interval boundary -1.60% (-7.73% to 4.53%) in the ITT analysis, -2.39% (-8.00% to 3.23%) in the MITT analysis, and -1.72% (-7.29% to 3.85%) in the PP analysis were greater than the predefined noninferiority margin of -10%, establishing a noninferiority of Group VA-10 versus Group VA-14 (noninferiority P = 0.001 in ITT analysis, P < 0.001 in MITT analysis, and P < 0.001 in PP analysis, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.

Ten-day VA dual therapy achieves comparable efficacy and safety to the 14-day regimen in Chinese population, providing patients with greater convenience and economic benefits.

A proportion of patients with functional dyspepsia (FD) have inadequate symptom control with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) treatment. Vonoprazan demonstrates higher efficacy in acid reduction than PPI; however, the existing efficacy data for vonoprazan in treating PPI-refractory FD is limited.

This double-blinded, randomized controlled trial study was conducted at Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok between December 2022 and 2023. Patients with FD who were unresponsive to the standard dose PPI were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 10 mg or 20 mg of vonoprazan for a 4-week duration, with a subsequent 4-week follow-up after treatment. The primary outcome was changes in the Global Overall Symptoms Scale (GOSS).

Sixty patients were randomized without significant differences in baseline characteristics between both groups. The mean GOSS between the 10-mg vonoprazan and the 20-mg vonoprazan arm were 25.73 and 26.17 at week 0, 14.33 and 15.50 at week 2, 9.37 and 10.04 at week 4, and 9.79 and 9.33 at week 8, respectively (all p < 0.001 vs. baseline and p > 0.05 between groups). The quality of life was improved, with the Nepean dyspepsia index changing -4.13 and -4.25 at week 4, respectively (all p < 0.001 vs. baseline; p = 0.853 between groups). Symptom response rates (> 50% improvement in GOSS) were 72.4% and 75.9% at week 8, respectively (p = 0.24 between groups). No serious adverse events were observed.

Vonoprazan demonstrated significant effects in the alleviation of symptoms in PPI-refractory FD patients. There was no statistically significant difference in symptom alleviation between the 10 mg and 20 mg doses of vonoprazan.

Zastaprazan (JP-1366) is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker for the treatment of acid-related disorders. We aimed to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of zastaprazan, thereby characterizing the PK of zastaprazan in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as well as evaluating the impact of various covariates, including CYP2C19 phenotypes, on zastaprazan PK. This population PK analysis included zastaprazan plasma concentration-time data from 92 patients with erosive GERD and 68 healthy volunteers without any gastrointestinal disorders and was performed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Simulations were conducted to predict zastaprazan PK under various dosing regimens in patients with GERD. The plasma PK of zastaprazan was adequately described by a two-compartment model with Erlang-type absorption (six sequential compartments) and first-order elimination. CYP2C19 phenotypes had no significant effect on zastaprazan PK. The disease status was identified as a significant covariate on apparent clearance of zastaprazan, showing lower values in patients with GERD compared to healthy volunteers. However, the model-based simulation indicated that the impact of disease status on zastaprazan exposure was not clinically meaningful. Overall, the current population PK model successfully characterized the observed zastaprazan PK in both patients with GERD and healthy volunteers.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is mainly treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) such as esomeprazole, which have shortcomings like delayed absorption and increased osteoporosis. Fexuprazan is a novel potent potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset and long duration of action. To assess the efficacy and safety of fexuprazan compared to esomeprazole in patients with LPRD.

This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, active-controlled trial was conducted in nine otolaryngologic clinics. Patients with reflux symptom index (RSI) ≥ 13 and reflux finding score (RFS) ≥ 7 were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan or esomeprazole groups, and received fexuprazan 40-mg or esomeprazole 40-mg once daily for 8 weeks. The outcomes were (1) mean change, change rate, and valid rate in RSI, RFS, and LPR-related questionnaires; and (2) adverse events.

A total of 136 patients (fexuprazan n = 68, esomeprazole n = 68) were followed up for ≥ 1 month. Each parameter significantly improved after 4 and 8 weeks in each group, with no significant differences between the two groups. For those with severe symptoms (RSI ≥ 18), the fexuprazan group (n = 32) showed more improvement in the mean change and change rate in the RSI than esomeprazole group (n = 31) after 4 weeks (p = .036 and .045, respectively). This phenomenon was especially observed in hoarseness and troublesome cough.

Fexuprazan improved symptoms and signs without no serious adverse events in patients with LPRD. In patients with severe symptoms, fexuprazan resulted in a faster symptom improvement than PPI.

KCT0007251, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do?seq=22100 .

To investigate the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan based bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (VBCQ) in eradicating Helicobacter pylori ( Hp ).

The VBCQ and the proton pump inhibitor-based bismuth-containing quadruple regimen (PBCQ) were compared by retrieving relevant studies in Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang data. Combined analysis was performed with risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI as effect values.

A total of 10 studies were enrolled, including 7 randomized controlled trials and 3 cohort studies. In intention-to-treat analysis, the eradication rate of VBCQ (89.24%, 1103/1236) was significantly higher than that of PBCQ (84.03%, 1021/1215), with RR = 1.06 (95% CI: 1.03~1.10). In per-protocol analysis, the eradication rates of VBCQ and PBCQ were 92.94% (895/963) and 87.82% (829/944), respectively, with a significant difference (RR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03~1.09). Subgroup analysis of study design types shared similar results. VBCQ and PBCQ showed an incidence of adverse reactions of 37.30% (304/815) and 34.94% (282/807), respectively. Significant differences were not found between the two groups (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.96-1.19), nor in subgroup analysis. The good compliance rates in VBCQ and PBCQ groups were 94.32% (216/229) and 95.13% (215/226), respectively, with no significant difference (RR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.95~1.04).

VBCQ has a higher eradication rate on Hp than PBCQ, while its adverse reactions and compliance are similar to PBCQ. However, we conservatively believe that in Hp eradication, the VBCQ is not inferior to PBCQ because of the small absolute difference.

Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice.

Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

Factors that determine clinical responses to vonoprazan remain unknown. This study aimed to characterize plasma vonoprazan and CYP3A activity using its endogenous marker and genetic variants in patients with digestive system disorders. Fifty-three patients who were receiving vonoprazan for at least 3 days were enrolled. Blood samples for determination of plasma vonoprazan and its metabolite (ODA-VP) were obtained. Plasma 4β-hydroxycholesterol (4β-OHC), CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes, and plasma gastrin were determined. CYP3A recognition for vonoprazan was evaluated using recombinant CYP3A proteins. Plasma vonoprazan levels exhibited a large interindividual variation. The absolute plasma concentration of vonoprazan was correlated with its dose-normalized value, and had a positive correlation with the inverse value of its metabolic ratio. A negative correlation was observed between plasma vonoprazan and 4β-OHC levels. The metabolic ratio of vonoprazan was positively correlated with the plasma 4β-OHC level. Genetic variants of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 were not associated with the plasma concentration of vonoprazan and its metabolic ratio. Possible saturated metabolism of vonoprazan to its major metabolite was observed at a therapeutic dose. Although the CYP3A5 genotype did not alter plasma vonoprazan, CYP3A activity based on plasma 4β-OHC partially explained the variation in plasma vonoprazan in patients with digestive system disorders.

Excessive stomach acid or bacterial infection are the root causes of gastric acid-related disorders, such as peptic ulcer disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Proton pump inhibitors including lansoprazole, omeprazole, esomeprazole, rabeprazole, etc. are medications used to treat gastric acid-related diseases. One of the most effective drugs for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease is vonoprazan, owing to its ability to strongly inhibit gastric acid. Proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan work in distinct ways to prevent the production of stomach acid. Vonoprazan inhibits acid secretion by blocking the potassium-competitive acid blocker receptor, whereas proton pump inhibitors function by irreversibly blocking the proton pump in the parietal cells of the stomach. Delayed release tablets, delayed release capsules, minitablets, pellets, bilayer, floating, mucoadhesive tablets and nanoparticles, are some of the methods used in the development of micro/nano formulations with proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan. Diagnosis and therapy of gastric acid-related illnesses, particularly those treated with drugs such as vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors, rely heavily on imaging modalities such as CT scans, X-rays, endoscopy, fluorescence and HRM imaging. This review provides a comprehensive update on various micro/nanoformulations of proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan. Moreover, we provide an outlook on clinical imaging of proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan formulation for gastric acid related diseases. We have limited our discussion to case studies and clinical trials on proton pump inhibitors and vonoprazan for gastric acid related disease.

High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been recommended to prevent rebleeding of high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) after hemostasis. Vonoprazan has been proven to be noninferior to PPIs in various acid-related diseases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan vs PPI for preventing high-risk PU rebleeding after hemostasis.

A multicenter, randomized, noninferiority study was conducted in 6 centers. Pre-endoscopic and endoscopic therapy were performed according to standard protocol. After successful hemostasis, patients with high-risk PU bleeding (Forrest class Ia/Ib, IIa/IIb) were randomized into 1:1 to receive vonoprazan (20 mg twice a day for 3 days, then 20 mg once a day for 28 days) or high-dose PPI (pantoprazole intravenous infusion 8 mg/h for 3 days, then omeprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days). The primary outcome was a 30-day rebleeding rate. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 7-day rebleeding rate, all-cause and bleeding-related mortality, rate of rescue therapy, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and safety.

Of 194 patients, baseline characteristics, severity of bleeding, and stage of ulcers were comparable between the 2 groups. The 30-day rebleeding rates in vonoprazan and PPI groups were 7.1% (7 of 98) and 10.4% (10 of 96), respectively; noninferiority (within 10% margin) of vonoprazan to PPI was confirmed (%risk difference, -3.3; 95% confidence interval, -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates in the vonoprazan group remained noninferior to PPI (P < .001 by Farrington and Manning test). All secondary outcomes were also comparable between the 2 groups.

In patients with high-risk PU bleeding, the efficacy of vonoprazan in preventing 30-day rebleeding was noninferior to intravenous PPI. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT05005910).

The escalating challenges of Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric complications, driven by rising antibiotic resistance and persistent cancer risks, underscore the demand for innovative therapeutic strategies. This study addresses this urgency through the development of tailored semi-interpenetrating polymer networks (semi-IPN) serving as gastroretentive matrices for amoxicillin (AMOX). They are biodegradable, absorb significant volume of simulated gastric fluid (swelling index > 360 %) and exhibit superporous microstructures, remarkable mucoadhesion, and buoyancy. The investigation includes assessment at pH 1.2 for comparative analysis with prior studies and, notably, at pH 5.0, reflecting the acidic environment in H. pylori-infected stomachs. The semi-IPN demonstrated gel-like structures, maintaining integrity throughout the 24-hour controlled release study, and disintegrating upon completing their intended function. Evaluated in gastroretentive drug delivery system performance, AMOX release at pH 1.2 and pH 5.0 over 24 h (10 %-100 %) employed experimental design methodology, elucidating dominant release mechanisms. Their mucoadhesive, buoyant, three-dimensional scaffold stability, and gastric biodegradability make them ideal for accommodating substantial AMOX quantities. Furthermore, exploring the inclusion of the potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) vonoprazan (VONO) in AMOX-loaded formulations shows promise for precise and effective drug delivery. This innovative approach has the potential to combat H. pylori infections, thereby preventing the gastric cancer induced by this pathogen.

Interethnic differences in the pharmacokinetics of drugs result from a complex interplay of environmental, genetic, and demographic factors. Identifying ethnic differences in pharmacokinetics is challenging due to the multifaceted contributions of the underlying factors. To address these challenges, this paper reviews 9 pharmacokinetic studies meeting the following criteria: (A) Conducted at Seoul National University Hospital from 2013 to 2022 as a single-center study. (B) Pharmacokinetic studies involving both East Asians (Korean, Japanese, or Chinese) and Caucasians. (C) Study drugs were administered orally. (D) Raw data was provided for reanalysis. This retrospective analysis aimed to investigate the existence of ethnic differences in drug exposure and understand the possible factors contributing to these variabilities. Pharmacokinetic, demographic, and clinical laboratory test data were analyzed to assess potential pharmacokinetic differences between East Asians and Caucasians. This assessment involved calculating the geometric mean ratio of dose-normalized area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) and dose- and weight-normalized AUC, along with their 90% confidence intervals. Additionally, pharmacological information, including metabolic pathways, was gathered from the investigational brochure or the respective country's drug label. Among 9 studies, 4 studies demonstrated approximately 1.3 to 1.8 times higher drug exposure in East Asians compared to Caucasians. These drugs were primarily eliminated through hepatic metabolism, with less than 5% excreted unchanged in the urine. Two drugs were metabolized by hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4, one by glutathione S-transferase, and specific metabolic pathways for another drug were not identified. Further research is needed to assess the causes of ethnic variability in these drugs.

GERD is a very familiar diagnosis among health care providers due to its massive spread, and its symptoms can affect the quality of life for a respectable slice of its patients. Therefore, what can only be described as a logical consequence, a pursuit of a treatment that can both relieve symptoms and have minimal side effects is still ongoing to cover the large demographic affected by GERD. In the following review, analysis will be made of GERD, including possible regulatory activity, of certain drugs to the already discussed pathways involved in GERD patients.

Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, has demonstrated greater potency and a longer duration of acid suppression when compared to the proton pump inhibitors. However, data regarding the comparison between vonoprazan-based triple therapy with standard treatment for first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy between 7-day vonoprazan-based triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin (VAC-7) and 14-day extended sequential therapy (S-14).

This was a single-center prospective randomized controlled trial following a noninferiority design. Subjects over 20 years old with confirmed H. pylori infection were enrolled prospectively from Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital. They were randomly assigned to the VAC-7 or S-14 group. The primary endpoint was the eradication rate in first-line treatment, evaluated by urea breath test, with noninferiority determined using the Farrington-Manning method. The secondary outcome included adverse effect rates and compliance, assessed through self-administered questionnaires.

Between December 2021 and June 2023, a total of 628 patients were recruited. The eradication rates by per-protocol analysis and intention-to-treat analysis were 88.6%/81.8% for VAC-7 and 90.3%/81.4% for S-14, respectively. The VAC-7 was non-inferior to S-14 in terms of ITT analysis. Subjects experienced fewer incidences of nausea, anorexia, dizziness, fatigue, and any severe adverse events in the VAC-7 group. Compliance was higher in the VAC-7 group, with 94% taking all the pills correctly.

Our findings supported the use of 7-day vonoprazan triple therapy with high-dose amoxicillin as the standard first-line treatment for H. pylori infection.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05371249.

Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy is the first-line treatment for eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). The optimal duration for H. pylori eradication using bismuth-containing quadruple therapy remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical effects of the 10- and 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple treatment regimen to eradicate H. pylori.

Treatment-naïve patients with H. pylori infection (n = 1300) were enrolled in this multicenter randomized controlled study across five hospitals in China. They were randomized into 10- or 14-day treatment groups to receive bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as follows: vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily; bismuth 220 mg twice daily; amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily; and either clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily or tetracycline 500 mg four times daily. At least 6 weeks after treatment, we performed a 13C-urea breath test to evaluate H. pylori eradication.

The per-protocol eradication rates were 93.22% (564/605) and 93.74% (569/607) (p < 0.001) and the intention-to-treat eradication rates were 88.62% (576/650) and 89.38% (581/650) (p = 0.007) for the 10- and 14-day regimens, respectively. Incidence of adverse effects was lower in patients who received 10- vs. 14 days of treatment (22.59% vs. 28.50%, p = 0.016). We observed no significant differences in the compliance to treatment or the discontinuation of therapy because of severe adverse effects between the groups.

Compared with the 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple regimens, the 10-day regimen demonstrated a non-inferior efficacy and lower incidence of adverse effects. Therefore, the 10-day regimen is safe and tolerated and could be recommended for H. pylori eradication (NCT05049902).

Background: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is well-established for its effectiveness in reducing re-bleeding in high-risk peptic ulcer patients following endoscopic hemostasis. Vonoprazan (VPZ) has demonstrated the capacity to achieve gastric pH levels exceeding 4, comparable to PPIs. This study aims to evaluate the comparative efficacy of intravenous PPI infusion versus VPZ in preventing re-bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis in patients with high-risk peptic ulcers. Methods: A randomized, double-blind, controlled, and double-dummy design was employed. Patients with peptic ulcer bleeding (Forrest class IA/IB or IIA/IIB) who underwent endoscopic hemostasis were randomly assigned to either the PPI group or the VPZ group. Re-bleeding rates at 3, 7, and 30 days, the number of blood transfusions required, length of hospitalization, and ulcer healing rate at 56 days were assessed. Results: A total of 44 eligible patients were enrolled, including 20 patients (PPI group, n = 11; VPZ group, n = 9) with high-risk peptic ulcers. The mean age was 66 years, with 70% being male. Re-bleeding within 72 h occurred in 9.1% of the PPI group versus 0% in the VPZ group (p = 1.000). There was no significant difference in re-bleeding rates within 7 days and 30 days (18.2% vs. 11.1%, p = 1.000). Additionally, the ulcer healing rate did not significantly differ between the groups (87.5% vs. 77.8%). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates comparable efficacy between oral vonoprazan and continuous PPI infusion in preventing recurrent bleeding events among high-risk peptic ulcer patients following successful endoscopic hemostasis.

A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method with vonoprazan fumarate-d4 as a stable isotope-labeled internal standard was developed and validated aiming at quantification of vonoprazan fumarate in human plasma for a bioequivalence study. Chromatographic separation was achieved by acetonitrile one-step protein precipitation using a gradient elution of 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution and acetonitrile with a run time of 3.65 min. Detection was carried out on a tandem mass spectrometer in multiple reaction monitoring mode via a positive electrospray ionization interface. The multiple reaction monitoring mode of precursor-product ion transitions for vonoprazan fumarate and vonoprazan fumarate-d4 were m/z 346.0 → 315.1 and 350.0 → 316.0, respectively. The linear range was 0.150-60.000 ng/ml. This method was fully validated with acceptable results in terms of selectivity, carryover, lower limit of quantification, calibration curve, accuracy, precision, dilution effect, matrix effect, stability, recovery and incurred sample reanalysis. A successful application of this method was realized in the bioequivalence study of vonoprazan fumarate tablet (20 mg) among healthy Chinese volunteers.

Healing rates of severe erosive esophagitis (EE; Los Angeles [LA] Grade C/D) in patients treated with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) is suboptimal (~60-70%). Vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is suggested to have better healing rates in patients with severe EE. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan 20 mg versus lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing EE, specifically in those with LA Grade C/D.

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL on May 24, 2023. Studies that randomized EE patients to vonoprazan 20 mg daily or lansoprazole 30 mg daily and compared healing rates were included. The risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool. The fixed-effect model was used to obtain the pooled efficacy and safety outcomes. Subgroup analysis was done to compare healing rates in mild (LA Grade A/B) versus severe EE and based on study location.

Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with low risks of bias comprising 2208 participants were included. Vonoprazan 20 mg was superior to lansoprazole 30 mg daily in healing severe EE at all weeks (Week 2 RR 1.294 [95% CI 1.169-1.433], Week 4 1.160 [1.059-1.270], and Week 8 1.175 [95% CI 1.107-1.247]), but was similar for mild EE at all weeks (P-interaction < 0.01). Vonoprazan 20 mg was more efficacious than lansoprazole 30 mg at Week 8 in Western versus Asian studies (P-interaction < 0.01). Any, serious, and drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups.

Vonoprazan 20 mg is superior to lansoprazole 30 mg for healing severe EE but not mild EE. Vonoprazan 20 mg daily has a similar safety profile to lansoprazole 30 mg daily.

The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably in many Western countries, and there is concern that numerous conditions and diseases associated with PPI use may be adverse events. The main function of gastric acid is to defend the organism against orally ingested microorganisms, and there is also concern that alterations not only in the gastric microbiome but also the downstream intestinal microbiome may increase the risk of disease or alter the course of preexisting disease. The current study is a systematic review of the available evidence from experimental trials investigating the effects of PPIs on the gastrointestinal microbiota by next-generation sequencing. Thirteen studies were identified. The effects of PPIs were seen on alterations in diversity and richness in some of the studies, while a larger proportion of the studies detected alterations at various taxonomic levels. The general finding was that PPI use caused an increase in bacteria normally found in the oral microbiota in both the upper and lower GI tract. The most consistent taxonomic alterations seemed to be increases in oral flora along the axis Streptococcaceae and Streptococcus at genus level and various Streptococcus spp., as well as Veillonellaceae, Veillonella and Haemophilus.

The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) remains controversial when compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens.

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA).

A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)].

In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.

The eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) has decreased due to antibiotics resistance and inadequate acid suppression. Vonoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB), which has a rapid and sustained acid inhibitory effect and may be more effective than conventional proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in H. pylori eradication.

to study the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan as a component of first-line H. pylori eradication treatment compared with conventional PPI-based therapy.

This randomised (one to one) non-blinded study was conducted on 400 consecutive proven H. pylori infected patients, of whom 200 received vonoprazan-based triple therapy, while 200 patients received PPI-based triple therapy for 14 days. The study outcomes were evaluated as eradication rate and adverse events in both patient groups.

The eradication rate was 86% in the vonoprazan group and 74.5% in the PPI group. The vonoprazan eradication rate was significantly higher than that of PPIs (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference regarding adverse events between both patient groups.

Vonoprazan-based therapy was more effective than PPI-based therapy as a first-line H. pylori eradication treatment. Vonoprazan was generally safe and well tolerated.

: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers.

: Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed.

: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups.

: Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.

Vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant and the first potassium-competitive acid blocker, has the potential to enhance the eradication rate of Helicobacter pylori due to its robust acid-suppressing capacity. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan-based dual therapy (vonoprazan-amoxicillin, VA) with vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (VBQT) as a first-line treatment for H pylori infection. This retrospective single-center non-inferiority study was conducted in China. Treatment-naive H pylori-positive patients aged 18 to 80 received one of the 2 treatment regimens at our center. The VA group received vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 1000 mg 3 times daily for 14 days, whereas the VBQT group received vonoprazan 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg twice daily for 14 days. The eradication rate was evaluated 4 to 6 weeks after treatment using the carbon-13/14 urea breath test. Propensity score matching was used to analyze eradication rates, adverse events (AEs), and patient compliance between the 2 groups. Initially, 501 patients were included, and after propensity score analysis, 156 patients were selected for the study. Intention-to-treat analysis showed eradication rates of 87.2% (95% CI, 79.8-94.6%) for the VA group and 79.5% (95% CI, 70.5-88.4%) for the VBQT group (P = .195). Per-protocol analysis demonstrated rates of 94.4% (95% CI, 89.2-99.7%) for the VA group and 96.8% (95% CI, 92.4-100%) for the VBQT group (P = .507). Non-inferiority was confirmed between the 2 groups, with P values < .025. The VA group showed a lower rate of AEs (10.3% vs 17.9%, P = .250) compared to the VBQT group. There were no significant differences in patient compliance between the 2 groups. In treatment-naive patients with H pylori infection, both the 14-day VA and VBQT regimens demonstrated comparable efficacy, with excellent eradication rates. Moreover, due to reduced antibiotic usage, lower rate of AEs, and lower costs, VA dual therapy should be prioritized.