|
1
|
Chen P, Han W, Li Y, Gao G, Yang H. Distance-Readout Paper-Based Microfluidic Chip with a DNA Hydrogel Valve for AFB1 Detection. Anal Chem 2025; 97:5975-5981. [PMID: 40072267 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.4c05083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2025]
Abstract
Accurate and rapid aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) detection is essential for ensuring the safety of food supplies. In this paper, we introduce a distance-readout paper-based microfluidic chip (DPMC) that offers a sensitive and reliable method for the detection of AFB1. The DPMC comprises a DNA hydrogel sensitive valve and a paper-based capillary channel. Upon exposure to AFB1, the hydrogel valve regulates the flow speed of the tested liquid into the capillary channel. Quantitative detection of AFB1 can be achieved without the need for complex instrumentation for external equipment by visually observing the distance traveled by the tested liquid through the capillary channel over a specified period. Under optimal conditions, the DPMC allows for quantitative detection of AFB1 solution concentrations ranging from 100 to 1000 pM by the naked eye, with a detection limit of 17.64 pM. This method has been successfully employed for quantitative detection of AFB1 in lotus seed samples, yielding a recovery rate between 85.2% and 118.4%. This approach provides a rapid, portable, sensitive, and highly selective visualization platform for on-site AFB1 detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng Chen
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Basic Research on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Robot Intelligent Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P. R. China
| | - Wenhao Han
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Sensors, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
| | - Yansheng Li
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Sensors, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
- Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
| | - Guowei Gao
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Sensors, Beijing Information Science & Technology University, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
- Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing 100192, P. R. China
| | - Hongjun Yang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Basic Research on Prevention and Treatment for Major Diseases, Robot Intelligent Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Experimental Research Center, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Wang X, Cao L, Song X, Zhu G, Ni B, Ma X, Li J. Is flexible sigmoidoscopy screening associated with reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality? a meta-analysis and systematic review. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1288086. [PMID: 38162502 PMCID: PMC10757863 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1288086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The question of whether flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) affects incidence or mortality remains unclear. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to explore this issue. Methods A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for cohort studies (CS), case-control studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people who underwent FS and reported mortality or incidence of CRC until 11 December 2022. Relative risk (RR) was applied as an estimate of the effect of interest. To combine the RRs and 95% confidence intervals, a random-effects model was used. The quality of the included studies and evidence was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale, the Jadad scale, and the "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation System." Results There were a total of six RCTs and one CS, comprising 702,275 individuals. FS was found to be associated with a 26% RR reduction in CRC incidence (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.84) and a 30% RR reduction in CRC mortality (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.58-0.85). In the incidence subgroup analysis, FS significantly reduced the incidence of CRC compared with non-screening, usual care, and fecal immunochemical testing. Significance was also shown in men, women, distal site, stages III-IV, ages 55-59, and age over 60. In terms of the mortality subgroup analysis, the results were roughly the same as those of incidence. Conclusion According to this study, FS might reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. To confirm this finding, further prospective clinical studies should be conducted based on a larger-scale population. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023388925.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinmiao Wang
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Luchang Cao
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaotong Song
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Guanghui Zhu
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Graduate School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Baoyi Ni
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Xinyi Ma
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Oncology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Heil FJ, Aschenbeck J, Hüppe D. [20 years of screening colonoscopy in Germany: current status, critical review and outlook]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2023; 148:77-84. [PMID: 36690003 DOI: 10.1055/a-1839-1710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
20 years of colonoscopy for early cancer detection and screening in Germany. A success story - there is no longer any doubt about that, but a critical look should not be missing either.
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rumpold H, Hackl M, Petzer A, Wolf D. Improvement in colorectal cancer outcomes over time is limited to patients with left-sided disease. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022; 148:3007-3014. [PMID: 34977964 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-021-03868-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) declined over the last decades. However, survival depends on the primary tumor location. It is unknown if all progress in outcomes vary depending on left-sided (LCRC) versus right-sided (RCC) colorectal cancer. We compare incidence and mortality rates over time according to the primary tumor location. METHODS Data from the Austrian National Cancer Registry spanning from 1983 to 2018 were used to calculate annual incidence and mortality rates and survival stratified by primary tumor localization and stage. Joinpoint regression with linear regression models were used on different subgroups to identify significant changes of incidence- and mortality slopes. RESULTS A total of 168,260 (incidence dataset) and 87,355 cases (mortality dataset) were identified. Survival of disseminated RCC was worse compared to LCRC (HR 1.14; CI 1.106-1.169). Total and LCRC incidence and mortality rates declined steadily over time, whereas the rates of RCC did not. Incidence of disseminated RCC declined significantly less (slope - 0.07; CI - 0.086; - 0.055) than in LCRC (slope - 0.159; CI - 0.183; - 0.136); mortality rate of RCC was unchanged over time. Incidence and mortality of localized RCC remained unchanged over time, whereas both rates declined independently of stage in LCRC. CONCLUSION Colorectal cancer outcomes during the last 35 years have preferentially improved in LCRC but not in RCC, indicating that the progress made is limited to LCRC. It is necessary to define RCC as a distinct form of CRC and to focus on specific strategies for its early detection and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holger Rumpold
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Ordensklinikum Linz, Seilerstaette 4, 4010, Linz, Austria. .,Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
| | - M Hackl
- National Cancer Registry, Statistics Austria, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Petzer
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Ordensklinikum Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - D Wolf
- Internal Medicine 5, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Zhang J, Chen G, Li Z, Zhang P, Li X, Gan D, Cao X, Du H, Zhang J, Zhang L, Ye Y. Colonoscopic screening is associated with reduced Colorectal Cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer 2020; 11:5953-5970. [PMID: 32922537 PMCID: PMC7477408 DOI: 10.7150/jca.46661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
It is the great priority to detect colorectal cancer (CRC) as early as possible, finally to reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, although colonoscopy is recommended in many consensuses, yet no one systematic review is conducted to figure out how colonoscopy could change the incidence and mortality. In our study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the association between colonoscopy screening and the incidence or mortality of CRC. PubMed, EMBASE, and PMC database were systematically searched from their inception to June 2020. A total of 13 cohort and 16 case-control studies comprising 4,713,778 individuals were obtained in this review. Our results showed that colonoscopy was associated with a 52% RR reduction in incidence of CRC (RR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.46-0.49) and 62% RR reduction in mortality of CRC (RR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.36-0.40). Subgroup analysis of different interventions, study design, country, sample size, age or sex showed that the incidence and mortality reduction remained consistent, and colonoscopy screening had the same effect on people below and above 50. Our study indicated that colonoscopy could significantly reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaxin Zhang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Guang Chen
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Zhiguo Li
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Peng Zhang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Xiaoke Li
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Da'nan Gan
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Xu Cao
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Hongbo Du
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Jiaying Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Ludan Zhang
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| | - Yong'an Ye
- Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.,Institute of Liver Diseases, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
P53 expression and micro-vessel density in relation with 5-year survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020; 57:311-314. [PMID: 32874562 PMCID: PMC7452034 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancers are among the commonest causes of cancer related morbidity and mortality worldwide. Adenomatous polyps which develop dysplastic changes are the main cause of invasive cancer. P53 inactivation is a key genetic step in the occurrence of cancer. The degree of the formation of the blood vessels inside the tumor (microvessel density) increases the ability of the tumor to have local infiltration, metastatic potential and may reflect the tumor metabolic activity. A total number of 104 patients who underwent surgeries for colorectal adenocarcinoma followed for 5 years. Patients were categorized into 4 categories based on tumor expression of P53 and micro-vessel density, 64.42% of patients were females, 58.7% died from colorectal cancer during the 5-year period, 37.5% had 5-years survival free from cancer, and 16.3% survived with recurrence, 28.8% had over expression of both P53 and MVD. A significant correlation was found between: P53 and MVD with the site of tumor occurrence being more significant with left-sided colonic tumors, the clinical stage being more significant with stage III disease, and with the survival rate being more significant in patients who died during this period, P values 0.025, 0.01, and 0.001 respectively. Overexpression of P53 and MVD are associated with higher mortality and more advanced disease. We advise a more aggressive form of therapy for colorectal adenocarcinomas expressing high level of both factors and tumors with high expression of both factors may need modification in the chemotherapeutic drugs or radiation therapy with closer follow up than tumors having lower expression.
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Saito H, Kudo SE, Takahashi N, Yamamoto S, Kodama K, Nagata K, Mizota Y, Ishida F, Ohashi Y. Efficacy of screening using annual fecal immunochemical test alone versus combined with one-time colonoscopy in reducing colorectal cancer mortality: the Akita Japan population-based colonoscopy screening trial (Akita pop-colon trial). Int J Colorectal Dis 2020; 35:933-939. [PMID: 32034490 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03518-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Screening programs using fecal occult blood testing help reduce mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy and colonoscopy combined with fecal occult blood testing are considered alternatives with higher sensitivity than fecal tests; however, to our knowledge, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) providing such evidence have not been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to compare screening using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) combined with colonoscopy and FIT alone to evaluate the efficacy of colonoscopy screening in reducing CRC mortality. METHODS This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled study included average-risk individuals for CRC living in the study areas and aged 40-74 years. The exclusion criteria were history of CRC, hereditary non-polyposis CRC, familial adenomatous polyposis, inflammatory bowel diseases, history of cancer other than CRC within the past 5 years, and not expected to survive from comorbid illness. The intervention group underwent one-time colonoscopy and annual FIT, while the control group underwent annual FIT. The primary endpoint was mortality from CRC, while the secondary endpoints were cumulative incidence of invasive CRC, advanced CRC (invasion into the muscle layer or deeper), invasive cancer and screening sensitivities and specificities of invasive CRC, whole CRC, advanced neoplasia, and prevalence of adverse events. The intervention and control groups comprised 4876 and 4875 participants, respectively. CONCLUSION This explanatory RCT evaluated the efficacy of colonoscopy screening by valid statistical inference based on randomization. Data on adverse events from this kind of screening are necessary when considering implementation of future screening programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN000001980.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Saito
- Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, 2-1-1 Higashi-Tsukurimichi, Aomori, 030-8553, Japan.
- Division of Medical Support and Partnership, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shin-Ei Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Noriaki Takahashi
- Division of Screening Assessment and Management, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
- Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Seiichiro Yamamoto
- Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenta Kodama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japanese Red Cross Fukushima Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koichi Nagata
- Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yuri Mizota
- Center for Cancer Control and Information Services, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumio Ishida
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Yasuo Ohashi
- Department of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Society, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Shen MJ, Lafata JE, D’Agostino TA, Bylund CL. Lower Adherence: A Description of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barrier Talk. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2019; 25:43-53. [PMID: 31795843 PMCID: PMC6981046 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2019.1697909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Understanding how patients and physicians discuss screening barriers may illuminate reasons for non-adherence to recommended colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The goal of the present study was to describe patients' reporting of and physicians' responses to CRC screening barriers and examine their associations with patients' CRC screening behaviors. Audio-recorded primary care consultations (N = 413) with patients due for CRC screening were used to identify CRC screening-related barrier talk and physician responses. Presence of barrier talk was associated with less patient adherence to CRC screening (OR = 0.568, p = 0.007). Neither CRC screening talk (n = 413) nor physician responses (n = 151) were associated with patients' CRC screening. Among the consultations in which barrier talk occurred (n = 151), patients most often reported test-related (28.9%) and psychological (26.1%) barriers. Barriers were most often reported in the context of CRC screening discussions (45.7%) or in direct response to a physician's question about CRC screening (48.6%). Results indicated that patients rarely raised CRC screening barriers unprompted and that presence of barrier talk was predictive of CRC screening behavior. These findings may help improve future clinical practice by highlighting that patients may benefit from physicians initiating and facilitating discussions of CRC screening barriers and directly helping patients overcome known barriers to CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jennifer Elston Lafata
- University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI
| | | | - Carma L. Bylund
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York, NY, USA
- University of Florida; Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Cox B, Sneyd MJ, Hingston G, McBride D, Bagshaw PF. Enhancing bowel screening: Preventing colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy in New Zealand. Public Health 2019; 179:27-37. [PMID: 31726398 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) attainable from introducing once-in-a-lifetime flexible sigmoidoscopy (FSIG) screening was assessed. STUDY DESIGN This is a review of relevant available information for the assessment of the impact and resource demands of FSIG in New Zealand. METHODS The reduction in bowel cancer incidence achievable by one-off FSIG screening from 50 to 59 years of age, an age group for which bowel screening is not currently offered, was reviewed. The prevention of CRC attainable from an offer of screening at 55 years of age in New Zealand was also estimated. The number and cost of the FSIG screening procedures required and referrals for colonoscopies and the savings in treatment were calculated. RESULTS Annually, about 27,500 FSIG screening procedures would be required if 50% of those turning 55 years of age accepted an offer of once-in-a-lifetime FSIG screening. This would result in three-four-fold fewer people being referred for colonoscopy than in the national 2-yearly faecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening programme and subsequently reduce demand for colonoscopy from a false-positive FIT. The number of CRC cases prevented would increase over 17 years to more than 300 per year by 2033. After 10-15 years of screening, the annual savings in health service costs, primarily from CRC prevented, were sufficient to completely fund the FSIG screening. CONCLUSIONS Inclusion of FSIG screening in the national bowel screening programme would significantly reduce both the incidence and mortality of CRC in New Zealand, reduce the colonoscopy demand of current bowel screening and reduce long-term health service costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Cox
- Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - M J Sneyd
- Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - G Hingston
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of New England, Port Macquarie private hospital, Ramsay Health Care, Eight Highfields Circuit, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia.
| | - D McBride
- Hugh Adam Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand.
| | - P F Bagshaw
- Canterbury Charity Hospital Trust, PO Box 20409, Christchurch, 8054, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended to reduce CRC mortality. This review outlines key factors to consider when recommending screening, including disease burden, screening benefits and harms, and remaining knowledge gaps. RECENT FINDINGS In response to increasing rates of CRC incidence among younger (age < 50 years) adults, the American Cancer Society published guidelines in May 2018 recommending average-risk CRC screening beginning at age 45 (vs. 50) years. Rates of young-onset CRC have increased in the USA since the early 1990s. However, there is very little empirical evidence of screening effectiveness in younger adults, and few studies have reported harms of routine screening in this age group. Further, we know little about the natural history of CRC in younger adults. Uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of CRC screening in younger adults suggests the benefits may be small. Precision cancer screening-or modified screening regimens based on risk-may improve the balance of screening benefits and harms beyond conventional age-based strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin C Murphy
- Division of Epidemiology, Departments of Clinical Sciences and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Januszewicz W, Fitzgerald RC. Early detection and therapeutics. Mol Oncol 2019; 13:599-613. [PMID: 30677217 PMCID: PMC6396365 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Early detection, including cancer screening and surveillance, is emerging as one of the most important topics in modern oncology. Because symptomatic presentation remains the predominant route to cancer diagnosis, there is a growing interest in developing techniques to detect the disease at an early, curative stage. Moreover, growing understanding of cancer biology has paved the way for prevention studies with the focus on therapeutic interventions for premalignant conditions. Where there is a recognisable precursor stage, such as a colorectal adenoma or Barrett's metaplasia, the removal of abnormal tissue prevents the development of cancer and enables stratification of the patient to a high-risk group requiring further surveillance. Here, we provide a review of the available technologies for early diagnosis and minimally-invasive treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wladyslaw Januszewicz
- MRC Cancer Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Lee DJ, Mai J, Huang TJ. Microfluidic approaches for cell-based molecular diagnosis. BIOMICROFLUIDICS 2018; 12:051501. [PMID: 30271515 PMCID: PMC6138474 DOI: 10.1063/1.5030891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/27/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
The search for next-generation biomarkers has enabled cell-based diagnostics in a number of disciplines ranging from oncology to pharmacogenetics. However, cell-based diagnostics are still far from clinical reality due to the complex assays and associated protocols which typically require cell isolation, lysis, DNA extraction, amplification, and detection steps. Leveraging recent advances in microfluidics, many biochemical assays have been translated onto microfluidic platforms. We have compared and summarized recent advances in modular approaches toward the realization of fully-integrated, cell-based molecular diagnostics for clinical and point-of-care applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Jun Lee
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA
| | - John Mai
- Alfred E. Mann Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
A Multicenter Study of Colorectal Adenomas Rationale, Objectives, Methods and Characteristics of the Study Cohort. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 81:157-63. [PMID: 7571020 DOI: 10.1177/030089169508100301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background and Aims The Multicenter Study of Colorectal Adenomas (SMAC) is a retrospective-prospective cohort study involving four Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Units in Italy. The main aim of the study is to evaluate the relationship between clinical and pathologic information at index colonoscopy and subsequent incidence of adenoma and colorectal carcinoma. We report the rationale, objectives and methods of the study, including patient characteristics at initial presentation. Methods All patients were consecutively identified from the endoscopy registries of the four Centres from January 1, 1985 to December 31, 1992. Inclusion criteria were: age 18-69 years, endoscopy performed with adequate toilette at least up to the rectosigmoid junction, and removal of all detectable polyps. Exclusion criteria were: familial adenomatous polyposis, inflammatory bowel diseases, adenocarcinoma in adenoma with infiltrated margins, previous invasive cancer at any site, colon resection and geographic inaccessibility. Results Out of 20,071 patients who underwent endoscopy at the four Centres, 11,959 fulfilled the eligibility criteria (5,892 males and 6,067 females, mean age = 51.1 ± 11.6 years). The main reasons for exclusion were age (n = 4,020) and previous or present colorectal cancer (n = 2,389). Symptoms were the most common reason for referral (72.3%), while post-polypectomy follow-up and positive fecal occult blood accounted for most of the remaining cases. A pancolonoscopy was performed in 3,088 patients (25.8%), while a left-sided endoscopy was performed in 7,887 (66%). A total number of 4,810 polyps were removed from 2,699 patients (2,994 adenomas, 1,580 hyperplastic polyps and 236 polyps lost after resection). A significant association (p < 0.001) between age and the endoscopic findings was observed. The subjects without polyps (n = 9,198) had the lowest age (mean = 49.9; 95%CL = 49.6 - 50.1) followed by the patients with hyperplastic polyps (n = 661; mean age = 52.3; 95%CL = 51.5-53.1), and the patients with adenomas (n = 1,732; mean age = 56.2; 95%CL = 55.8 - 56.6), and the patients with hyperplastic polyps and adenomas (n = 306; mean age = 57.2; 95%CL = 56.3 - 58.2). Polyps were diagnosed more frequently in males than in females (28.6% versus 17.0%; p < 0.0001). Conclusion This study provides some insights in the natural history of colorectal cancer and stresses the need to develop adequate strategies in the follow-up of subjects after either positive or negative colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Martell RE, Xu FJ, Davis WZ, Anselmino L, Yu YH, Daly L, Bast RC. OVX1 and CEA in Patients with Colon Carcinoma, Colon Polyps and Benign Colon Disorders. Int J Biol Markers 2018; 13:145-9. [PMID: 10079388 DOI: 10.1177/172460089801300304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The OVX1 tumor marker promises to complement CA125 for detection of early stage ovarian carcinoma. OVX1 has also been shown to be elevated in colon cancer patients. This study is designed to assess serum OVX1 levels in patients with specific stages of colon cancer, colon polyps or other GI disorders. Serum OVX1 and CEA were measured by radioimmunoassay or enzyme immunoassay for 206 patients at the time of colonoscopy or staging for colon carcinoma. In patients with stage I, II, III, or IV colon carcinoma, serum OVX1 was positive in 37%, 48%, 74% and 63%, respectively. Fifty-three percent of patients with colon polyps had elevated OVX1 levels, while OVX1 levels were positive in only 7% of healthy controls. If both OVX1 and CEA were considered, at least one of these markers was elevated in 36%, 60%, 79% or 89% of patients with stage I, II, III or IV colon carcinoma, respectively. The majority of patients with inflammatory bowel disease or diverticulosis also had elevated OVX1 levels. Both markers were positive in 27% of patients with colon carcinoma, and not in any patients with a normal colonoscopy or with a diagnosis of diverticulosis or hemorrhoids. In conclusion, serum OVX1 improves the sensitivity of CEA for detecting colon polyps and colon cancer; however, the use of OVX1 in this setting is hindered by its elevation in non-malignant colonic processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R E Martell
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Labianca R, Merelli B. Screening and Diagnosis for Colorectal Cancer: Present and Future. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/548.6506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Barbara Merelli
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Kim HG, Cho YS, Cha JM, Shin JE, Kim KO, Yang HJ, Koo HS, Joo YE, Boo SJ. Risk of metachronous neoplasia on surveillance colonoscopy in young patients with colorectal neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87:666-673. [PMID: 28619245 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.05.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 05/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Few prior reports exist that address the appropriate colonoscopy surveillance interval for individuals <50 years old. We compared the risk of metachronous neoplasia between younger (20-49 years) and older (50-54 years) cohorts. METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study compared the incidence of metachronous neoplasia in younger and older cohorts according to baseline risk stratification. Subjects were eligible if they underwent their first colonoscopy between June 2006 and May 2010 and had at least 1 or more surveillance colonoscopy up to June 2015. RESULTS Among a total of 10,477 subjects who underwent baseline colonoscopy, 9722 were eligible after excluding 755 subjects. Of those 9722 subjects, 43% underwent surveillance colonoscopy. In the baseline high-risk adenoma group (n = 840), the 3-year risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was 10.7% in the younger patients on screening colonoscopy and 8.9% in the older patients (P > .1). In the baseline low-risk adenoma group (n = 1869), the 5-year risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was 4.9% in the younger patients on screening colonoscopy and 5.1% in the older patients (P > .1). Similarly, in the baseline no neoplasia group (n = 7013), the 5-year risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia was 4.1% in the younger patients on screening colonoscopy and 5.6% in the older patients (P > .1). CONCLUSIONS Considering the similar risk of metachronous advanced neoplasia in younger and older individuals, we suggest a 3-year surveillance interval for high-risk adenoma and a 5-year surveillance interval for low-risk adenoma in young individuals without a strong family history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Gun Kim
- Department of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Seok Cho
- Department of Medicine, Catholic University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Department of Medicine, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Shin
- Department of Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Kyeong Ok Kim
- Department of Internal, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyo-Joon Yang
- Department of Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hoon Sup Koo
- Department of Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Young-Eun Joo
- Department of Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sun-Jin Boo
- Department of Medicine, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Zhang J, Cheng Z, Ma Y, He C, Lu Y, Zhao Y, Chang X, Zhang Y, Bai Y, Cheng N. Effectiveness of Screening Modalities in Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2017; 16:252-263. [PMID: 28687458 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate on the effectiveness of screening modalities in the prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence and deaths. General meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of CRC incidence and mortality using a search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies from January 1992 to March 2016. A network meta-analysis was performed to synthetically compare the effectiveness of 5 frequently used screening modalities. A total of 44 studies with a focus on mortality from CRC using different screening methods were included. General meta-analysis showed that fecal immunohistochemical testing (FIT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, combination of fecal occult blood testing and FS screening respectively reduced CRC mortality by 59% (relative risk [RR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.59), 33% (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.58-0.78), 61% (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31-0.50), 38% (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42-0.91) compared with no screening, whereas guaiac fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) reduced CRC-related mortality by 14% (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.82-0.90). Subgroup analysis showed that summary estimates of reduction in distal CRC mortality and proximal CRC mortality were 26% (95% CI, 62%-89%) and 10% (95% CI, 83%-98%). A network meta-analysis revealed rank probability analysis in which the colonoscopy had a 94.6% probability of being the most effective examination to reduce CRC mortality. In addition, the network meta-analysis estimated odds ratio, which was a 79% reduction (95% CI, 0.09-0.60) in CRC mortality when screening with FIT was compared with annual or biennial gFOBT and colonoscopy was approximately 80% more effective than gFOBT for reducing CRC mortality (RR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.13-0.54). Analysis of the effects of different screening methods showed that there was a significant reduction in the incidence of colon cancer, excluding gFOBT. This meta-analysis confirmed that gFOBT, FIT, FS, and colonoscopy were all effective in preventing CRC deaths and a major reduction in distal but not proximal CRC mortality was found. In addition, they were more effective in preventing CRC incidence in addition to gFOBT. The network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective screening for preventing CRC deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Zhiyuan Cheng
- Center of Evidence-Based Medicine of Lanzhou University, Basic Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China; Medical School, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Yubao Ma
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Caili He
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Yongbin Lu
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Yaxue Zhao
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Xiaoyu Chang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Yawei Zhang
- Medical School, Yale University, New Haven, CT
| | - Yana Bai
- Institute of Epidemiology and Statistics, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China
| | - Ning Cheng
- Basic Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Maida M, Macaluso FS, Ianiro G, Mangiola F, Sinagra E, Hold G, Maida C, Cammarota G, Gasbarrini A, Scarpulla G. Screening of colorectal cancer: present and future. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2017; 17:1131-1146. [PMID: 29022408 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2017.1392243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in males and second in females, and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide. Currently, about 60-70% of diagnosed cases in symptomatic patients are detected at an advanced stage of disease. Earlier stage detection through the use of screening strategies would allow for better outcomes in terms of reducing the disease burden. Areas covered: The aim of this paper is to review the current published evidence from literature which assesses the performance and effectiveness of different screening tests for the early detection of CRC. Expert commentary: Adequate screening strategies can reduce CRC incidence and mortality. In the last few decades, several tests have been proposed for CRC screening. To date, there is still insufficient evidence to identify which approach is definitively superior, and no screening strategy for CRC can therefore be defined as universally ideal. The best strategy would be the one that can be economically viable and to which the patient can adhere best to over time. The latest guidelines suggest colonoscopy every 10 years or annual fecal immuno-chemical test (FIT) for people with normal risk, while for individuals with high risk or hereditary syndromes specific recommendations are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Maida
- a Section of Gastroenterology , S.Elia - Raimondi Hospital , Caltanissetta , Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Ianiro
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Francesca Mangiola
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Emanuele Sinagra
- d Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit , Fondazione Istituto San Raffaele Giglio , Cefalù , Italy
| | - Georgina Hold
- e School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition , University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK
| | - Carlo Maida
- f Section of Internal Medicine , DIBIMIS, University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Giovanni Cammarota
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- c Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology & Liver Unit , Università Cattolica Sacro Cuore , Rome , Italy
| | - Giuseppe Scarpulla
- a Section of Gastroenterology , S.Elia - Raimondi Hospital , Caltanissetta , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Primary Care Provider Perceptions of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers: Implications for Designing Quality Improvement Interventions. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:1619747. [PMID: 28163715 PMCID: PMC5259663 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1619747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2016] [Revised: 12/10/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims. Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underutilized. Increasing CRC screening rates requires interventions targeting multiple barriers at each level of the healthcare organization (patient, provider, and system). We examined groups of primary care providers (PCPs) based on perceptions of screening barriers and the relationship to CRC screening rates to inform approaches for conducting barrier assessments prior to designing and implementing quality improvement interventions. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study linking EHR and survey data. PCPs with complete survey responses for questions addressing CRC screening barriers were included (N = 166 PCPs; 39,430 patients eligible for CRC screening). Cluster analysis identified groups of PCPs. Multivariate logistic regression estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for predictors of membership in one of the PCP groups. Results. We found two distinct groups: (1) PCPs identifying multiple barriers to CRC screening at patient, provider, and system levels (N = 75) and (2) PCPs identifying no major barriers to screening (N = 91). PCPs in the top half of CRC screening performance were more likely to identify multiple barriers than the bottom performers (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 2.43–7.08). Conclusions. High-performing PCPs can more effectively identify CRC screening barriers. Targeting high-performers when conducting a barrier assessment is a novel approach to assist in designing quality improvement interventions for CRC screening.
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Leavesley SJ, Walters M, Lopez C, Baker T, Favreau PF, Rich TC, Rider PF, Boudreaux CW. Hyperspectral imaging fluorescence excitation scanning for colon cancer detection. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2016; 21:104003. [PMID: 27792808 PMCID: PMC5084534 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.21.10.104003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 10/04/2016] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Optical spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging have shown the potential to discriminate between cancerous and noncancerous tissue with high sensitivity and specificity. However, to date, these techniques have not been effectively translated to real-time endoscope platforms. Hyperspectral imaging of the fluorescence excitation spectrum represents new technology that may be well suited for endoscopic implementation. However, the feasibility of detecting differences between normal and cancerous mucosa using fluorescence excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging has not been evaluated. The goal of this study was to evaluate the initial feasibility of using fluorescence excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging for measuring changes in fluorescence excitation spectrum concurrent with colonic adenocarcinoma using a small pre-pilot-scale sample size. Ex vivo analysis was performed using resected pairs of colorectal adenocarcinoma and normal mucosa. Adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histologic evaluation of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) permanent sections. Specimens were imaged using a custom hyperspectral imaging fluorescence excitation-scanning microscope system. Results demonstrated consistent spectral differences between normal and cancerous tissues over the fluorescence excitation range of 390 to 450 nm that could be the basis for wavelength-dependent detection of colorectal cancers. Hence, excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging may offer an alternative approach for discriminating adenocarcinoma from surrounding normal colonic mucosa, but further studies will be required to evaluate the accuracy of this approach using a larger patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silas J. Leavesley
- University of South Alabama, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 150 Jaguar Drive, SH 4129, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
- University of South Alabama, Department of Pharmacology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3372, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
- University of South Alabama, Center for Lung Biology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3340, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Mikayla Walters
- University of South Alabama, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 150 Jaguar Drive, SH 4129, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Carmen Lopez
- University of South Alabama, Medical Sciences Program, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3340, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Thomas Baker
- University of South Alabama, Department of Pharmacology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3372, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Peter F. Favreau
- University of South Alabama, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 150 Jaguar Drive, SH 4129, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
- University of South Alabama, Center for Lung Biology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3340, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Thomas C. Rich
- University of South Alabama, Department of Pharmacology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3372, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
- University of South Alabama, Center for Lung Biology, 5851 USA North Drive, MSB 3340, Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
| | - Paul F. Rider
- University of South Alabama, Department of Surgery, 2451 Fillingim Street, Mastin Building, Suite 701, Mobile, Alabama 36617, United States
| | - Carole W. Boudreaux
- University of South Alabama, Department of Pathology, 2451 Fillingim Street, Mobile, Alabama 36617, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Screening Brief. J Med Screen 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/096914139700400115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
|
22
|
Wiegering A, Ackermann S, Riegel J, Dietz UA, Götze O, Germer CT, Klein I. Improved survival of patients with colon cancer detected by screening colonoscopy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016; 31:1039-1045. [PMID: 26763006 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2501-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/31/2015] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening for colon cancer (CC) may not only reduce its occurrence but has also the potential to reduce the overall mortality. So far, there has been little evidence that detection of colon cancer by screening colonoscopy results in different survival rates compared to symptomatic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Clinical, histological, diagnostic, and survival data of 1016 consecutive patients with CC from a prospectively expanded single-institutional database were analyzed for diagnostic, treatment, and prognostic factors. Findings were then stratified according to detection by screening colonoscopy vs. patients who became symptomatic prior to further diagnostic work-up. RESULTS 7.1 % of all patients were identified by screening colonoscopy for colon cancer. Screened patients were younger (68.2 vs. 64.8 years), had smaller T stage (p = 0.032), lower tumor stage (p = 0.009), and a tendency to less lymph node metastasis. Overall survival was superior in screened patients, and stage-specific survival showed a tendency to improved survival, which was not statistically significant. Furthermore, a higher percentage of screened patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (84.6 vs. 55.0 %, p = 0.032). CONCLUSION Survival outcome and enrollment in a multimodal treatment was higher in screening-detected patients compared to patients diagnosed after the onset of clinical symptoms. Besides a potential occurrence of lead time bias, these findings strongly support the need for continued improvement of screening programs and the recruitment of more patients for colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Armin Wiegering
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany. .,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany. .,Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, Julius-Maximilian's University, Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| | - Sabine Ackermann
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Riegel
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich A Dietz
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Götze
- Department of Medicine II, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Centre Mainfranken, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneiderstr. 6, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Ingo Klein
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 2, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany. .,Comprehensive Cancer Centre Mainfranken, University Hospital, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneiderstr. 6, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany. .,Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital, Julius-Maximilian's University, Wuerzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Wuerzburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
Leavesley SJ, Wheeler M, Lopez C, Baker T, Favreau PF, Rich TC, Rider PF, Boudreaux CW. Hyperspectral Imaging Fluorescence Excitation Scanning for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Pilot Study. PROCEEDINGS OF SPIE--THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR OPTICAL ENGINEERING 2016; 9703:970315. [PMID: 34429564 PMCID: PMC8381751 DOI: 10.1117/12.2213153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Optical spectroscopy and hyperspectral imaging have shown the theoretical potential to discriminate between cancerous and non-cancerous tissue with high sensitivity and specificity. To date, these techniques have not been able to be effectively translated to endoscope platforms. Hyperspectral imaging of the fluorescence excitation spectrum represents a new technology that may be well-suited for endoscopic implementation. However, the feasibility of detecting differences between normal and cancerous mucosa using fluorescence excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging has not been evaluated. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate the changes in the fluorescence excitation spectrum of resected specimen pairs of colorectal adenocarcinoma and normal colorectal mucosa. Patients being treated for colorectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Representative adenocarcinoma and normal colonic mucosa specimens were collected from each case. Specimens were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen. Adenocarcinoma was confirmed by histologic evaluation of H&E permanent sections. Hyperspectral image data of the fluorescence excitation of adenocarcinoma and surrounding normal tissue were acquired using a custom microscope configuration previously developed in our lab. Results demonstrated consistent spectral differences between normal and cancerous tissues over the fluorescence excitation spectral range of 390-450 nm. We conclude that fluorescence excitation-scanning hyperspectral imaging may offer an alternative approach for differentiating adenocarcinoma and surrounding normal mucosa of the colon. Future work will focus on expanding the number of specimen pairs analyzed and will utilize fresh tissues where possible, as flash freezing and reconstituting tissues may have altered the autofluorescence properties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silas J Leavesley
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
- Dept. of Pharmacology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
- Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Mikayla Wheeler
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Carmen Lopez
- Medical Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Thomas Baker
- Medical Sciences, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Peter F Favreau
- Dept. of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
- Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Thomas C Rich
- Dept. of Pharmacology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
- Center for Lung Biology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | - Paul F Rider
- Dept. of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL 36688
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Abstract
Most polyps that originate in the colon and rectum are benign. A small subset of polyps will contain a malignancy. Although most malignant adenomas are managed with colonic resection a number can be approached with endoscopic, minimally invasive, and observational techniques. This article reviews the histologic characteristics and adverse risk factors that would portend a poor oncologic outcome and therefore suggest formal colonic resection. Modern endoscopic techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal resection are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason F Hall
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts ; Department of Surgery, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Bhatt BD, Lukose T, Siegel AB, Brown RS, Verna EC. Increased risk of colorectal polyps in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease undergoing liver transplant evaluation. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015; 6:459-68. [PMID: 26487938 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Screening colonoscopy is a standard part of the liver transplant (LT) evaluation process. We aimed to evaluate the yield of screening colonoscopy and determine whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) was associated with an increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. METHODS We retrospectively assessed all patients who completed LT evaluation at our center between 1/2008-12/2012. Patients <50 years old and those without records of screening colonoscopy, or with greater than average colon cancer risk were excluded. RESULTS A total of 1,102 patients were evaluated, 591 met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The mean age was 60 years, 67% were male, 12% had NAFLD and 88% had other forms of chronic liver disease. Overall, 42% of patients had a polyp found on colonoscopy: 23% with adenomas, 14% with hyperplastic polyps and with 1% inflammatory polyps. In the final multivariable model controlling for age, NAFLD [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, P=0.001] and a history of significant alcohol use (OR 1.69, P=0.004) were predictive of finding a polyp on colonoscopy. In addition, NAFLD (OR 1.95, P=0.02), significant alcohol use (OR 1.70, P=0.01) and CTP class C (OR 0.57, P=0.02) were associated with adenoma, controlling for age. CONCLUSIONS Screening colonoscopy in patients awaiting LT yields a high rate of polyp (43%) and adenoma (22%) detection, perhaps preventing the accelerated progression to carcinoma that can occur in immunosuppressed post-LT patients. Patients with NAFLD may be at a ~2 fold higher risk of adenomas and should be carefully evaluated prior to LT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birju D Bhatt
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thresiamma Lukose
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Abby B Siegel
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert S Brown
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth C Verna
- Center for Liver Disease and Transplantation, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Laiyemo AO, Burnside C, Laiyemo MA, Kwagyan J, Williams CD, Idowu KA, Ashktorab H, Kibreab A, Scott VF, Sanderson AK. Beverage intake preference and bowel preparation laxative taste preference for colonoscopy. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2015; 6:84-88. [PMID: 26261736 PMCID: PMC4526843 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v6.i3.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2015] [Revised: 05/13/2015] [Accepted: 06/11/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To examine whether non-alcoholic beverage intake preferences can guide polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based bowel laxative preparation selection for patients.
METHODS: We conducted eight public taste test sessions using commercially procured (A) unflavored PEG, (B) citrus flavored PEG and (C) PEG with ascorbate (Moviprep). We collected characteristics of volunteers including their beverage intake preferences. The volunteers tasted the laxatives in randomly assigned orders and ranked the laxatives as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd based on their taste preferences. Our primary outcome is the number of 1st place rankings for each preparation.
RESULTS: A total of 777 volunteers completed the study. Unflavored PEG was ranked as 1st by 70 (9.0%), flavored PEG by 534 (68.7%) and PEG with ascorbate by 173 (22.3%) volunteers. Demographic, lifestyle characteristics and beverage intake patterns for coffee, tea, and carbonated drinks did not predict PEG-based laxative preference.
CONCLUSION: Beverage intake pattern was not a useful guide for PEG-based laxative preference. It is important to develop more tolerable and affordable bowel preparation laxatives for colonoscopy. Also, patients should taste their PEG solution with and without flavoring before flavoring the entire gallon as this may give them more opportunity to pick a pattern that may be more tolerable.
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Friedrich K, Grüter L, Gotthardt D, Eisenbach C, Stremmel W, Scholl SG, Rex DK, Sieg A. Survival in patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed by screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 82:133-7. [PMID: 25986151 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2014] [Accepted: 12/17/2014] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Germany, screening colonoscopy was first established in 2002 as part of the national cancer screening program. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether colorectal cancer (CRC) survival differs when CRC is diagnosed by screening colonoscopy (S-CRC) versus diagnostic colonoscopy (D-CRC). DESIGN Long-term, retrospective, multicenter, observational study. SETTING Study centers: 10 private gastroenterology practices in Germany. PATIENTS A total of 60 patients diagnosed with CRC during screening colonoscopy and 252 patients during diagnostic colonoscopy in 2002, 2003, and 2004. INTERVENTIONS Colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Survival of patients up to December 2013. RESULTS Mean (± standard deviation [SD]) follow-up time was 81.0 (± 40.1) months. Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) stages I and II were found more often in S-CRC (81.6%) compared with D-CRC (59.9%; P < .002). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significantly reduced overall survival for patients with D-CRC (mean [± SD] 86.9 [± 3.0] months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 81.0-92.8) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 107.1 [± 4.9] months; 95% CI, 97.4-116.9; P = .003). When deaths not related to CRC were excluded, survival was still shorter for D-CRC patients (mean [± SD] 89.4 [± 3.0] months; 95% CI, 83.5-95.4) compared with S-CRC (mean [± SD] 109.6 [± 4.7] months; 95% CI, 100.2-119.0; P = .004). LIMITATIONS Retrospective study design. CONCLUSION In this long-term, retrospective study, patients with CRC diagnosed during screening colonoscopy lived significantly longer when compared with patients with CRC diagnosed during diagnostic colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian Friedrich
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ludwig Grüter
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Gotthardt
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Eisenbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Stremmel
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sabine G Scholl
- Department of Social Psychology, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Department of Gastroenterology, Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Andreas Sieg
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Practice of Gastroenterology, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
Dinalankara W, Bravo HC. Gene Expression Signatures Based on Variability can Robustly Predict Tumor Progression and Prognosis. Cancer Inform 2015; 14:71-81. [PMID: 26078586 PMCID: PMC4460970 DOI: 10.4137/cin.s23862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2015] [Revised: 03/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Gene expression signatures are commonly used to create cancer prognosis and diagnosis methods, yet only a small number of them are successfully deployed in the clinic since many fail to replicate performance on subsequent validation. A primary reason for this lack of reproducibility is the fact that these signatures attempt to model the highly variable and unstable genomic behavior of cancer. Our group recently introduced gene expression anti-profiles as a robust methodology to derive gene expression signatures based on the observation that while gene expression measurements are highly heterogeneous across tumors of a specific cancer type relative to the normal tissue, their degree of deviation from normal tissue expression in specific genes involved in tissue differentiation is a stable tumor mark that is reproducible across experiments and cancer types. Here we show that constructing gene expression signatures based on variability and the anti-profile approach yields classifiers capable of successfully distinguishing benign growths from cancerous growths based on deviation from normal expression. We then show that this same approach generates stable and reproducible signatures that predict probability of relapse and survival based on tumor gene expression. These results suggest that using the anti-profile framework for the discovery of genomic signatures is an avenue leading to the development of reproducible signatures suitable for adoption in clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wikum Dinalankara
- Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Computer Science and UMIACS, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Héctor Corrada Bravo
- Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, Department of Computer Science and UMIACS, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Disgusted, embarrassed, annoyed: affective associations relate to uptake of colonoscopy screening. Ann Behav Med 2015; 48:112-9. [PMID: 24500079 DOI: 10.1007/s12160-013-9580-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uptake of colorectal cancer screening is lower than desired. Screening decision making research has traditionally focused on benefits and barriers to screening. This study examines the relation of affective associations with screening (feelings and emotions associated with screening) to colonoscopy screening uptake. METHODS Participants were 103 African American community adults. Participants completed a structured interview assessing perceived benefits of and barriers to colonoscopy screening, affective associations with colonoscopy, colonoscopy screening behavior, and intentions for future screening. RESULTS Higher positive and lower negative affective associations with screening were both significant predictors of colonoscopy uptake. Affective associations fully mediated the relation of perceived benefits and barriers to screening uptake. Affective associations were associated with intentions for future screening. CONCLUSIONS Incorporation of affective associations into models of screening decision making and intervention approaches to address screening compliance has utility for advancing our understanding of screening adherence as well as increasing screening rates.
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Zauber AG. The impact of screening on colorectal cancer mortality and incidence: has it really made a difference? Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:681-91. [PMID: 25740556 PMCID: PMC4412262 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-015-3600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 194] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
About sixty percent of the US population of those age fifty and older are currently up to date with colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Has this level of screening made a difference for reducing colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and/or mortality? Randomized controlled trials of guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests, which have relatively low sensitivity but high specificity for CRC, have shown a modest effect but with a long-term reduction in CRC mortality. Newer fecal immunochemical tests are expected to have a greater effect. Randomized controlled trials of flexible sigmoidoscopy have also demonstrated a reduction in CRC mortality. Observational studies of screening colonoscopy suggest an effect of greater than fifty percent reduction in CRC mortality. We have assessed past trends of colorectal cancer screening in the US population which suggest that more than fifty percent of the decline in colorectal cancer mortality can be attributed to the increased acceptance and uptake in colorectal cancer screening. Current and future levels of increased screening could provide for even larger reductions for the USA. Colorectal cancer screening has and will continue to make a significant impact on reducing colorectal cancer mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Elmunzer BJ, Singal AG, Sussman JB, Deshpande AR, Sussman DA, Conte ML, Dwamena BA, Rogers MA, Schoenfeld PS, Inadomi JM, Saini SD, Waljee AK. Comparing the effectiveness of competing tests for reducing colorectal cancer mortality: a network meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81:700-709.e3. [PMID: 25708757 PMCID: PMC4766592 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2014] [Accepted: 10/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness data pertaining to competing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests do not exist but are necessary to guide clinical decision making and policy. OBJECTIVE To perform a comparative synthesis of clinical outcomes studies evaluating the effects of competing tests on CRC-related mortality. DESIGN Traditional and network meta-analyses. Two reviewers identified studies evaluating the effect of guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), or colonoscopy on CRC-related mortality. INTERVENTIONS gFOBT, FS, colonoscopy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS Traditional meta-analysis was performed to produce pooled estimates of the effect of each modality on CRC mortality. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed to indirectly compare the effectiveness of screening modalities. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS Traditional meta-analysis revealed that, compared with no intervention, colonoscopy reduced CRC-related mortality by 57% (relative risk [RR] 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.58), whereas FS reduced CRC-related mortality by 40% (RR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.45-0.78), and gFOBT reduced CRC-related mortality by 18% (RR 0.82; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88). NMA demonstrated nonsignificant trends favoring colonoscopy over FS (RR 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.11) and FS over gFOBT (RR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.51-1.09) for reducing CRC-related deaths. NMA-based simulations, however, revealed that colonoscopy has a 94% probability of being the most effective test for reducing CRC mortality and a 99% probability of being most effective when the analysis is restricted to screening studies. LIMITATIONS Randomized trials and observational studies were combined within the same analysis. CONCLUSION Clinical outcomes studies demonstrate that gFOBT, FS, and colonoscopy are all effective in reducing CRC-related mortality. Network meta-analysis suggests that colonoscopy is the most effective test.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Joseph Elmunzer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases and the Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jeremy B. Sussman
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amar R. Deshpande
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Daniel A. Sussman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Marisa L. Conte
- University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ben A. Dwamena
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mary A.M. Rogers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Philip S. Schoenfeld
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - John M. Inadomi
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sameer D. Saini
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Akbar K. Waljee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Rex DK. Colonoscopy: the current king of the hill in the USA. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:639-46. [PMID: 25511920 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-014-3448-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 11/15/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Colonoscopy is the dominant colorectal cancer screening strategy in the USA. There are no randomized controlled trials completed of screening colonoscopy, but multiple lines of evidence establish that colonoscopy reduces colorectal cancer incidence in both the proximal and distal colon. Colonoscopy is highly operator dependent, but systematic efforts to measure and improve quality are impacting performance. Colonoscopy holds a substantial advantage over other strategies for detection of serrated lesions, and a recent case-control study suggests that once-only colonoscopy or colonoscopy at 20-year intervals, by a high-level detector, could ensure lifetime protection from colorectal cancer for many patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas K Rex
- Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N. University Boulevard, Indiana University Hospital #4100, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA,
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
Lin OS, Kozarek RA, Cha JM. Impact of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: an evidence-based review of published prospective and retrospective studies. Intest Res 2014; 12:268-74. [PMID: 25374491 PMCID: PMC4214952 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2014.12.4.268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2014] [Revised: 08/09/2014] [Accepted: 08/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is now common in many developed countries. This concise, evidence-based review looks at the impact of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening on CRC incidence, CRC mortality and overall mortality. Data from controlled retrospective and prospective (observational or randomized) studies have generally shown that sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, whether for diagnostic, screening or surveillance purposes, are associated with a significant reduction in CRC incidence and CRC mortality. The data on their impact on overall mortality is much more limited, with most studies unable to report a reduction in overall mortality. The results of three meta-analyses have confirmed these conclusions. As expected, sigmoidoscopy has a predominant effect on left-sided CRC, although some studies have shown modest effects on right-sided colon cancer as well. Most studies on colonoscopy have demonstrated that the protective effect applies to both right and left-sided cancer, although the protection seemed better on the left side. Despite the introduction of other screening and diagnostic modalities for the colon, such as computed tomography colonography and colonic capsule endoscopy, lower endoscopy will continue to be an important mode of screening for CRC and evaluating the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Otto S Lin
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Gastroenterology Division, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Richard A Kozarek
- Digestive Disease Institute, Virginia Mason Medical Center; Gastroenterology Division, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jae Myung Cha
- Gastroenterology Division, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gang Dong, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Yang YX, French B, Localio AR, Brensinger CM, Lewis JD. Minimal benefit of earlier-than-recommended repeat colonoscopy among US Medicare enrollees following a negative colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2014; 40:843-53. [PMID: 25123489 DOI: 10.1111/apt.12902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2014] [Revised: 06/09/2014] [Accepted: 07/16/2014] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of US Medicare beneficiaries undergo earlier-than-recommended follow-up colonoscopies after negative screening colonoscopy. Such practice entails substantial cost and added risk. AIMS To compare the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with varying follow-up colonoscopy intervals following a negative colonoscopy, and to determine whether the potential benefit of a shorter colonoscopy follow-up interval would differ by gender. METHODS We conducted a weighted cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked database (1991-2006) among 932,370 Medicare enrollees who are representative of the entire US elderly population. We compared the cumulative incidence of CRC among patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopies at different intervals following a negative colonoscopy. The primary outcome was incident CRC. RESULTS The eligible study cohort (n = 480,864) included 106,924 patients who underwent ≥1 colonoscopy. Men were more likely to require polypectomy during their initial colonoscopy than women. Compared to the recommended 9-10 year follow-up colonoscopy interval, an interval of 5-6 years was associated with the largest CRC cumulative risk reduction [i.e. 0.17% (95% CI: 0.009-0.32%)]. The magnitude of risk reduction associated with shorter colonoscopy follow-up intervals was not significantly different between men and women. CONCLUSIONS Among elderly individuals who undergo a negative colonoscopy, the magnitude of reduction in the cumulative CRC risk afforded by earlier-than-recommended follow-up colonoscopy is quite small, and probably cannot justify the risk and cost of increased colonoscopy frequency. In addition, there are insufficient differences between men and women to warrant gender-specific recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y-X Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Carney TJ, Morgan GP, Jones J, McDaniel AM, Weaver M, Weiner B, Haggstrom DA. Using computational modeling to assess the impact of clinical decision support on cancer screening improvement strategies within the community health centers. J Biomed Inform 2014; 51:200-9. [PMID: 24953241 PMCID: PMC4194243 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2013] [Revised: 04/28/2014] [Accepted: 05/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Our conceptual model demonstrates our goal to investigate the impact of clinical decision support (CDS) utilization on cancer screening improvement strategies in the community health care (CHC) setting. We employed a dual modeling technique using both statistical and computational modeling to evaluate impact. Our statistical model used the Spearman's Rho test to evaluate the strength of relationship between our proximal outcome measures (CDS utilization) against our distal outcome measure (provider self-reported cancer screening improvement). Our computational model relied on network evolution theory and made use of a tool called Construct-TM to model the use of CDS measured by the rate of organizational learning. We employed the use of previously collected survey data from community health centers Cancer Health Disparities Collaborative (HDCC). Our intent is to demonstrate the added valued gained by using a computational modeling tool in conjunction with a statistical analysis when evaluating the impact a health information technology, in the form of CDS, on health care quality process outcomes such as facility-level screening improvement. Significant simulated disparities in organizational learning over time were observed between community health centers beginning the simulation with high and low clinical decision support capability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Jay Carney
- Indiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States; University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, United States.
| | - Geoffrey P Morgan
- Carnegie Mellon University, Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (CASOS), United States.
| | - Josette Jones
- Indiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States.
| | - Anna M McDaniel
- Indiana University School of Informatics (IUPUI), United States; Indiana University School of Nursing, United States.
| | | | - Bryan Weiner
- University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health, United States.
| | - David A Haggstrom
- VA HSR&D Center of Excellence on Implementing Evidence-based Practice, United States; Roudebush VA Medical Center Regenstrief Institute, Inc., United States; Division of General Internal Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Ryu SY, Crespi CM, Maxwell AE. Colorectal cancer among Koreans living in South Korea versus California: incidence, mortality, and screening rates. ETHNICITY & HEALTH 2014; 19:406-23. [PMID: 23713441 PMCID: PMC3795980 DOI: 10.1080/13557858.2013.801404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study compared trends in colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality rates among Koreans in South Korea and Korean Americans and non-Hispanic whites in California between 1999 and 2009, and examined CRC screening rates and socio-demographic correlates of CRC screening in the two Korean populations. DESIGN Age-standardized CRC incidence and mortality rates of Koreans in South Korea and Korean Americans and non-Hispanic whites in California for the years 1999-2009 were obtained from annual reports of cancer statistics and modeled using joinpoint regression. Using 2009 data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and the California Health Interview Survey, we estimated and compared CRC screening rates and test modalities. We used multiple logistic regression to examine socio-demographic correlates of completion of CRC screening according to the guidelines among the two Korean populations. RESULTS CRC incidence and mortality rates among South Koreans increased during 1999-2009 but more slowly during the late 2000s. In California, CRC incidence increased among Korean American females but decreased among non-Hispanic whites. About 37% of South Koreans and 60% of Korean Americans reported completion of CRC screening according to guidelines in 2009. Among South Koreans, married status, higher income, and private health insurance were associated with CRC screening, adjusting for other factors. Among Korean Americans, having health insurance was associated with CRC screening. CONCLUSION Despite almost identical CRC screening guidelines in South Korea and the USA and substantially higher screening rates among Korean Americans as compared to South Koreans, disparities remain in both populations with respect to CRC statistics. Thus, efforts to promote primary and secondary prevention of CRC in both Korean populations are critically important in both countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- So Yeon Ryu
- a Chosun University Medical School , Gwangju , Republic of Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Turgeon DK, Ruffin MT. Screening strategies for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic adults. Prim Care 2014; 41:331-53. [PMID: 24830611 DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2014.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
This article provides an update for the primary care community on the evidence and recommendations for colorectal cancer screening in the adult population without symptoms at average and increased risk, excluding patients with high-risk genetic syndromes. The current and possible new screening strategies are reviewed, along with clinical wisdom related to the implementation of each method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Kim Turgeon
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Mack T Ruffin
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, 1018 Fuller Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common cancer in Taiwan. Colorectal cancer screening can prevent or detect cancer early, but the acceptance rate in rural southern Taiwan is unknown. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to explore the prevalence of CRC screening and related factors in rural south Taiwan. METHODS Cross-sectional study was conducted. Sample population was recruited from 2 rural areas in southern Taiwan. A structured questionnaire was completed by 635 participants. The following outcomes were studied: sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge of CRC screening, acceptance of CRC screening, and the reasons for having or not having CRC screening. RESULTS The results indicated that 4.7% of the respondents had undergone a fecal occult blood test, 3.1% had undergone a sigmoidoscopy, and 2.7% had undergone a colonoscopy. For overall CRC screening, knowledge that CRC was the most common form of cancer was significant (P < .01). Among participants who knew that CRC was the most common form of cancer, the odds of undergoing CRC screening were 4.20-fold greater than among participants who did not know that CRC was the most common form of cancer (P < .01; confidence interval, 1.62-10.89). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that the acceptance of CRC screening among men remains higher than among women in rural southern Taiwan. Efforts to improve CRC screening in rural areas should focus on increasing community residents' knowledge about cancer incidence and prevention. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Colorectal cancer screening is a useful cancer prevention measure, and community health center nurses should assess and promote rural residents' acceptance for CRC screening.
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. BMJ 2014; 348:g2467. [PMID: 24922745 PMCID: PMC3980789 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g2467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 604] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To review, summarise, and compare the evidence for effectiveness of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy in the prevention of colorectal cancer occurrence and deaths. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Two investigators independently extracted characteristics and results of identified studies and performed standardised quality ratings. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials and observational studies in English on the impact of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in the general population at average risk. RESULTS For screening sigmoidoscopy, four randomised controlled trials and 10 observational studies were identified that consistently found a major reduction in distal but not proximal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Summary estimates of reduction in distal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality were 31% (95% confidence intervals 26% to 37%) and 46% (33% to 57%) in intention to screen analysis, 42% (29% to 53%) and 61% (27% to 79%) in per protocol analysis of randomised controlled trials, and 64% (50% to 74%) and 66% (38% to 81%) in observational studies. For screening colonoscopy, evidence was restricted to six observational studies, the results of which suggest tentatively an even stronger reduction in distal colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, along with a significant reduction in mortality from cancer of the proximal colon. Indirect comparisons of results of observational studies on screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy suggest a 40% to 60% lower risk of incident colorectal cancer and death from colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy even though this incremental risk reduction was statistically significant for deaths from cancer of the proximal colon only. CONCLUSIONS Compelling and consistent evidence from randomised controlled trials and observational studies suggests that screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy prevent most deaths from distal colorectal cancer. Observational studies suggest that colonoscopy compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy decreases mortality from cancer of the proximal colon. This added value should be examined in further research and weighed against the higher costs, discomfort, complication rates, capacities needed, and possible differences in compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, INF 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Stock
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, INF 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, INF 581, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Regge D, Iussich G, Senore C, Correale L, Hassan C, Bert A, Montemezzi S, Segnan N. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials 2014; 15:97. [PMID: 24678896 PMCID: PMC3977672 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-97] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/31/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most prevalent type of cancer in Europe. A single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening at around the age of 60 years prevents about one-third of CRC cases. However, FS screens only the distal colon, and thus mortality from proximal CRC is unaffected. Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a highly accurate examination that allows assessment of the entire colon. However, the benefit of CTC testing as a CRC screening test is uncertain. We designed a randomized trial to compare participation rate, detection rates, and costs between CTC (with computer-aided detection) and FS as primary tests for population-based screening. METHODS/DESIGN An invitation letter to participate in a randomized screening trial comparing CTC versus FS will be mailed to a sample of 20,000 people aged 58 or 60 years, living in the Piedmont region and the Verona district of Italy. Individuals with a history of CRC, adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or recent colonoscopy, or with two first-degree relatives with CRC will be excluded from the study by their general practitioners. Individuals responding positively to the invitation letter will be then randomized to the intervention group (CTC) or control group (FS), and scheduled for the screening procedure. The primary outcome parameter of this part of the trial is the difference in advanced neoplasia detection between the two screening tests. Secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness analysis, referral rates for colonoscopy induced by CTC versus FS, and the expected and perceived burden of the procedures. To compare participation rates for CTC versus FS, 2,000 additional eligible subjects will be randomly assigned to receive an invitation for screening with CTC or FS. In the CTC arm, non-responders will be offered fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as alternative screening test, while in the FS arm, non-responders will receive an invitation letter to undergo screening with either FOBT or CTC. Data on reasons for participation and non-participation will also be collected. DISCUSSION This study will provide reliable information concerning benefits and risks of the adoption of CTC as a mass screening intervention in comparison with FS. The trial will also evaluate the role of computer-aided detection in a screening setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01739608.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Regge
- Radiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, FPO, Strada Provinciale 142, Candiolo 10060, Italy
| | - Gabriella Iussich
- Radiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment, FPO, Strada Provinciale 142, Candiolo 10060, Italy
| | - Carlo Senore
- CPO Piemonte and AO ‘City of Health and Science,’ SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Cesare Hassan
- Department of Radiological Sciences Oncology and Pathology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Nereo Segnan
- CPO Piemonte and AO ‘City of Health and Science,’ SC Epidemiologia dei Tumori, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Brenner H, Chang-Claude J, Jansen L, Knebel P, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. Reduced risk of colorectal cancer up to 10 years after screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2014; 146:709-17. [PMID: 24012982 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 232] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2013] [Revised: 08/27/2013] [Accepted: 09/01/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Data from randomized controlled trials on the effects of screening colonoscopies on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are not available. Observational studies have suggested that colonoscopies strongly reduce the risk of CRC, but there is little specific evidence on the effects of screening colonoscopies. METHODS We performed a population-based case-control study of 3148 patients with a first diagnosis of CRC (cases) and 3274 subjects without CRC (controls) from the Rhine-Neckar region of Germany from 2003 to 2010. Detailed information on previous colonoscopy and potential confounding factors was collected by standardized personal interviews. Self-reported information on colonoscopies and their indications was validated by medical records. We used multiple logistic regression to assess the association between colonoscopy conducted for specific indications within the past 10 years and risk of CRC. RESULTS A history of colonoscopy was associated with a reduced subsequent risk of CRC, independently of the indication for the examination. However, somewhat stronger associations were found for examinations with screening indications (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07-0.13) than for examinations with diagnostic indications, such as positive fecal occult blood test result (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.57), surveillance after a preceding colonoscopy (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.24-0.45), rectal bleeding (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.20-0.40), abdominal symptoms (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.10-0.21), or other (OR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.30). Colonoscopy was also associated with a reduced risk of cancer in the right colon, regardless of the indication, although to a smaller extent than for other areas of the colon (OR for screening colonoscopy, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.14-0.33). CONCLUSIONS In a population-based case-control study, the risk of CRC was strongly reduced up to 10 years after colonoscopy for any indication. Risk was particularly low after screening colonoscopy, even for cancer in the right colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Unit of Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lina Jansen
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Phillip Knebel
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Stock
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Hoffmeister
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Jansen L. Comparisons of colorectal cancer mortality between screening participants and the general population are strongly biased unless an incidence-based mortality approach is used. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67:184-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2013] [Revised: 07/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
|
46
|
Fecal Collection and Stabilization Methods for Improved Fecal DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer in a Screening Setting. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1155/2013/818675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Early detection of CRC and adenomas reduces CRC-related mortality. The optimal screening test for CRC is still a subject of debate, and molecular stool sample analysis could provide a valid alternative to conventional methods in terms of compliance and practicability. Seven fecal DNA storage systems were evaluated in two successive phases. In the first phase of the study was selected the preservative buffer able to ensure the best human DNA recovery. In the second phase was evaluated human DNA stability, amplificability and integrity in DNA extracted from selected buffer. Results showed that the best performance was obtained in samples stored in 100 mM EDTA buffer and Genefec buffer. Likewise buffer addition yielded a significant increase in DNA stability and integrity without PCR inhibition, compared to the matched aliquots with no buffer added. Our study shows that samples collected in stabilization solution stabilize DNA so that intact nucleic acids, are more effectively detectable in the molecular assay. DNA buffer preservation and storage conditions could be useful to guarantee the most consistent yield in human DNA. Stabilization buffer addition to stool samples prior to transport presents an easily implemented solution that appears to be highly effective. Overall DNA extracted from faeces preserved in preservative buffer can feasibility been used for molecular analysis leading to an increase of assay sensitivity.
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Shin A, Choi KS, Jun JK, Noh DK, Suh M, Jung KW, Kim BC, Oh JH, Park EC. Validity of fecal occult blood test in the national cancer screening program, Korea. PLoS One 2013; 8:e79292. [PMID: 24260189 PMCID: PMC3832630 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2013] [Accepted: 09/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The aims of the current study were to assess the validity of the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) in an organized screening setting in Korea and to determine factors associated with FOBT validity, such as screening round, age group, and anatomical location of the cancer. METHODS Study participants were those who were 50 years and older who received an FOBT through the National Cancer Screening Program between 2004 and 2007. Colorectal cancer diagnoses were ascertained through linkage with the Korean National Cancer Incidence Database. The positivity rate, colorectal cancer detection rate, interval cancer rate, sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the FOBT were calculated. RESULTS A total of 2,193,093 tests were included in the analysis. Overall, the sensitivity of the FOBT for colorectal cancer was 59.7% for the first round and 56.1% for the subsequent round. Sensitivity was highest for distal colon cancer (65.9%) in the first round, and for rectal cancer (58.4%) for the subsequent round. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of the FOBT generally improved between 2004 and 2008. CONCLUSIONS The FOBT showed reasonable validity in an organized screening setting, and the validity of the FOBT varied by screening round, anatomical location, and screening year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aesun Shin
- Molecular Epidemiology Branch, Research Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
- Cancer Registration & Statistics Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Kui Son Choi
- Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Jae Kwan Jun
- Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Dai Keun Noh
- Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Mina Suh
- Cancer Early Detection Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Kyu-Won Jung
- Cancer Registration & Statistics Branch, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Jae Hwan Oh
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Korea
| | - Eun-Cheol Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine & Institute of Health Services Research, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Hannon PA, Maxwell AE, Escoffery C, Vu T, Kohn M, Leeman J, Carvalho ML, Pfeiffer DJ, Dwyer A, Fernandez ME, Vernon SW, Liang L, DeGroff A. Colorectal Cancer Control Program grantees' use of evidence-based interventions. Am J Prev Med 2013; 45:644-8. [PMID: 24139779 PMCID: PMC4618374 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2013] [Revised: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/25/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for adults aged 50-75 years, yet screening rates are low, especially among the uninsured. The CDC initiated the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) in 2009 with the goal of increasing CRC screening rates to 80% by 2014. A total of 29 grantees (states and tribal organizations) receive CRCCP funding to (1) screen uninsured adults and (2) promote CRC screening at the population level. PURPOSE CRCCP encourages grantees to use one or more of five evidence-based interventions (EBIs) recommended by the Guide to Community Preventive Services. The purpose of the study was to evaluate grantees' EBI use. METHODS A web-based survey was conducted in 2011 measuring grantees' use of CRC screening EBIs and identifying their implementation partners. Data were analyzed in 2012. RESULTS Twenty-eight grantees (97%) completed the survey. Most respondents (96%) used small media. Fewer used client reminders (75%); reduction of structural barriers (50%); provider reminders (32%); or provider assessment and feedback (50%). Provider-oriented EBIs were rated as harder to implement than client-oriented EBIs. Grantees partnered with several types of organizations to implement EBIs, many with county- or state-wide reach. CONCLUSIONS Almost all grantees implement EBIs to promote CRC screening, but the EBIs that may have the greatest impact with CRC screening are implemented by fewer grantees in the first 2 years of the CRCCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peggy A Hannon
- Health Promotion Research Center, Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Eldridge RC, Doubeni CA, Fletcher RH, Zauber AG, Corley DA, Doria-Rose VP, Goodman M. Uncontrolled confounding in studies of screening effectiveness: an example of colonoscopy. J Med Screen 2013; 20:198-207. [PMID: 24144847 DOI: 10.1177/0969141313508282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the expected magnitude of error produced by uncontrolled confounding from health behaviours in observational medical record-based studies evaluating effectiveness of screening colonoscopy. METHODS We used data from the prospective National Institutes of Health American Association of Retired Persons (NIH-AARP) Diet and Health Study to assess the impact of health behaviour related factors (lifestyle, education, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAID]) on the association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. We first examined the difference between adjusted and unadjusted results within the cohort data, and then estimated a broader range of likely confounding errors based on the Breslow-Day approach that uses prevalence of confounders among persons with and without exposure, and the rate ratio reflecting the association between these confounders and the outcome of interest. As dietary factors and habits are often inter-correlated, we combined these variables (physical activity, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, alcohol consumption, and intakes of red meat, processed meat, fibre, milk, and calcium) into a "healthy lifestyle score" (HLS). RESULTS The estimated error (a ratio of biased-to-true result) attributable to confounding by HLS was 0.959-0.997, indicating less than 5% departure from the true effect of colonoscopy on CRC mortality. The corresponding errors ranged from 0.970 to 0.996 for NSAID, and from 0.974 to 1.006 for education (all ≤3% difference). The results for other CRC screening tests were similar. CONCLUSION Health behaviour-related confounders, either alone or in combination, seem unlikely to strongly affect the association between colonoscopy and CRC mortality in observational studies of CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald C Eldridge
- Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Brenner H, Stock C, Hoffmeister M. In the era of widespread endoscopy use, randomized trials may strongly underestimate the effects of colorectal cancer screening. J Clin Epidemiol 2013; 66:1144-50. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2013] [Revised: 05/01/2013] [Accepted: 05/14/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|