Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Feb 15, 2013; 4(1): 12-17
Published online Feb 15, 2013. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v4.i1.12
Published online Feb 15, 2013. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v4.i1.12
Group tested | |
Tumor stage | I+ II |
(TNM classification) | 6 (14) |
III | |
18 (42) | |
IV | |
19 (44) | |
T1 | |
Depth of tumor invasion | 2 (6) |
T2 | |
4 (13) | |
T3 | |
15 (47) | |
T4 | |
11 (34) | |
N0 | |
Lymph node metastases | 7 (17) |
N1 | |
4 (9) | |
N2 | |
13 (31) | |
N3 | |
18 (43) | |
Distant metastases | M0 |
9 (47) | |
M1 | |
10 (53) |
PLT | sP-selectin | IL-6 | |
Study group E1 | 247.33 ± 42.92 | 67.93 ± 74.49 | 20.68 ± 6.31 |
E1 vs C | E1 vs C | E1 vs C | |
0.8 < P < 0.9 | P < 0.05 | P < 0.01 | |
Study group E2 | 662.83 ± 335.23 | 153.37 ± 174.59 | 10.90 ± 8.43 |
E1 vs E2 | E1 vs E2 | E1 vs E2 | |
P < 0.05 | 0.5 < P < 0.6 | 0.1 < P < 0.2 | |
E2 vs C | E2 vs C | E2 vs C | |
P < 0.05 | 0.6 < P < 0.7 | 0.05 < P < 0.1 | |
Study group A1 | 344.28 ± 266.40 | 193.23 ± 143.70 | 11.51 ± 8.44 |
A1 vs C | A1 vs C | A1 vs C | |
0.05 < P < 0.1 | 0.05 < P < 0.1 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group A2 | 584.25 ± 237.54 | 278.54 ± 158.64 | 20.42 ± 12.88 |
A1 vs A2 | A1 vs A2 | A1 vs A2 | |
P < 0.05 | P < 0.001 | 0.2 < P < 0.3 | |
A2 vs C | A2 vs C | A2 vs C | |
P < 0.01 | 0.2 < P < 0.3 | P < 0.05 | |
Study group M1 | 335.84 ± 154.08 | 173.71 ± 116.79 | 8.44 ± 5.63 |
M1 vs C | M1 vs C | M1 vs C | |
P < 0.01 | 0.1 < P < 0.2 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group M2 | 451.55 ± 210.74 | 178.96 ± 84.56 | 15.26 ± 12.73 |
M1 vs M2 | M1 vs M2 | M1 vs M2 | |
0.2 < P < 0.3 | 0.1 < P < 0.2 | 0.1 < P < 0.2 | |
M2 vs C | M2 vs C | M2 vs C | |
P < 0.01 | 0.5 < P < 0.6 | P < 0.05 | |
Control group C | 247.78 ± 44.74 | 130.38 ± 48.35 | 2.45 ± 1.44 |
Percentage of phag-ocytizing platelets | Phagocytic index | |
Study group early carcinoma E1 | 1.08 ± 0.08 | 1.02 ± 0.04 |
E1 vs C | E1 vs C | |
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group early carcinoma E2 | 1.27 ± 0.10 | 1.07 ± 0.05 |
E1 vs E2 | E1 vs E2 | |
P < 0.05 | 0.05 < P < 0.1 | |
E2 vs C | E2 vs C | |
P < 0.01 | P < 0.01 | |
Study group advanced carcinoma with lymph node involvement A1 | 1.10 ± 0.11 | 1.02 ± 0.11 |
A1 vs C | A1 vs C | |
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group advanced carcinoma with lymph node involvement A2 | 1.23 ± 0.08 | 1.03 ± 0.06 |
A1 vs A2 | A1 vs A2 | |
P < 0.05 | 0.7 < P < 0.8 | |
A2 vs C | A2 vs C | |
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group metastatic cancer M1 | 1.13 ± 0.10 | 1.0 ± 0.07 |
M1 vs C | M1 vs C | |
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Study group metastatic cancer M2 | 1.20 ± 0.12 | 1.05 ± 0.08 |
M1 vs M2 | M1 vs M2 | |
0.2 < P < 0.3 | 0.7 < P < 0.8 | |
M2 vs C | M2 vs C | |
P < 0.001 | P < 0.001 | |
Control group C | 2.26 ± 0.57 | 1.83 ± 0.37 |
- Citation: Matowicka-Karna J, Kamocki Z, Kemona H. Assessment of platelet activation and phagocytic activity in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2013; 4(1): 12-17
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v4/i1/12.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v4.i1.12