BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Mar 22, 2026; 17(1): 118132
Published online Mar 22, 2026. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v17.i1.118132
Table 1 A Summary of the pharmacology of incretin analogues[9,16,17]
Drug
Mechanism of action
Contraindications
Side effects
Peculiar features
TirzepatideDual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonistPersonal/family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma; MEN2; hypersensitivity to drugsGI upset (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), increased heart rate, and possible gallbladder/biliary diseaseGreatest body weight loss among incretin dual agonists; weekly injection; potent glucose-lowering effects
Mazdutide (LY3305677)Dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistSame as above (GLP-1 class), caution in pancreatitisGI upset, increased heart rate, possible transient hyperglycemiaAlso reduces liver fat; superior effect on dyslipidemia/liver enzymes; once-weekly injection
CotadutideDual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistAs above, severe GI diseaseGI upset (nausea/diarrhea mostly), mild increase in heart rateStrong hepatic fat/lipid-lowering effects; less potent on body weight than the GIP combination
SurvodutideDual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistAs aboveGI symptoms (similar to GLP-1), ↑heart ratePotent weight and liver fat reduction; phase 3 for obesity and MASH
SAR425899Dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistAs aboveGI upset, possible increased heart rateEarly clinical studies: Moderate efficacy
RetatrutideTriple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonistAs above, caution in severe heart diseaseGI upset is very common; increased heart rate, and some reports of mild hypoglycemiaHighest %body weight loss (up to 24%); reduces hepatic fat, robust metabolic effects
EfocipegtrutideTriple GLP-1/GIP/glucagon receptor agonistAs aboveGI side effects, increased heart rateIn the early clinical stage of development, phase 2 trials are ongoing
Semaglutide + cagrilintideGLP-1 and amylin analogue co-agonistAs above: Severe GI disease; gastroparesisNausea, vomiting (higher than semaglutide alone), constipationSuperior weight loss to monotherapies; once-weekly injection; appetite suppression
PYY/GLP-1 and other gut hormone combosMulti-gut hormone co-agonism varies per moleculeUnknown, not established yetGI upset (anticipated), long-term safety data pendingAims to mimic post-bariatric physiology; most are in early development
Table 2 Recent studies and trials on anti-obesity medications and bariatric surgery for obesity treatment
Ref.
Study type
Population/setting
Comparison groups
Main outcomes
Complications/notes
Dicker et al[36], 2024Large retrospective matched cohort6070 adults with obesity and diabetes; Israel, 2008-2022; median 6.8 years follow-upMBS vs GLP-1 RAsMBS: 62% reduction in mortality vs GLP-1 RAs for diabetes ≤ 10 years. No difference if diabetes > 10 years. Weight loss: MBS (-31.4% BMI) vs GLP-1 RAs (-12.8%). No difference in MACEsMBS survival benefit mediated by greater weight loss. Similar glycemic control long term. Complications were not directly compared
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery[32]Real-world retrospective comparative study51085 adults BMI ≥ 35, New York city 2018-2024Bariatric surgery (sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass) vs GLP-1 RAs (semaglutide, tirzepatide)2 years: Bariatric surgery = 58-pound average loss (24% body weight); GLP-1 = 12-pound average (4.7%), 7% for those on drugs all year. Surgery: About 5 times more weight lossOver 50% discontinued GLP-1 in 1 year, 72% by 2 years. Surgery is more durable. Complication rates for surgery are not detailed, but surgery is found to be effective and safe
Yan et al[37], 2019Meta-analysis (4 RCTs, 6 cohorts)Adults with severe obesity and T2DM (> 5 years follow-up)Bariatric surgery vs conservative (non-surgical, includes meds and lifestyle)Bariatric surgery: Lower macrovascular complications (RR = 0.43), lower MI (RR = 0.40), and greater weight and glycemic improvementSurgery is superior for CV outcomes and weight. Complications depend on the surgical type, but risks are higher than with medication
Newman[38], 2025Review/expert summaryGeneral adult obesity populationBariatric surgery vs anti-obesity medicationsBariatric surgery provides greater and longer-lasting weight loss compared to anti-obesity medsSurgery: More durable weight loss. Meds are easier to administer and reversible, but have fewer profound effects
Courcoulas et al[39], 2024Pooled RCTs (7-12 years follow-up)Diabetes + obesity/overweightSurgery vs medical/lifestyleSurgery: Greater long-term weight loss, improved glycemic control, and increased diabetes remissionSurgery: Higher long-term risk of nutritional deficiencies, GI events, and fractures. Meds have a lower risk profile but less efficacy
Lincoff et al[40], 2023Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial17604 adults (BMI ≥ 27) with preexisting CV disease, no diabetes; 41 countries, mean 39.8 months follow-upSemaglutide 24 mg weekly vs placeboSemaglutide: 6.5% CV events vs placebo: 8.0% (HR = 0.80, 95%CI: 0.72-0.90, P < 0.001). Reduced death from CV causes, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal strokeMore adverse events led to discontinuation in the semaglutide group (16.6% vs 8.2%). No surgery arm. Strong CV benefit among anti-obesity drugs in high-risk patients without diabetes
Hernandez et al[41], 2018Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial9463 adults with T2DM and established cardiovascular disease, global, median 1.6 years follow-upAlbiglutide 30-50 mg weekly vs placeboPrimary composite (CV death, MI, stroke): 7% albiglutide vs 9% placebo (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.68-0.90; superiority P = 0.0006)Incidence of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and medullary thyroid carcinoma is low and not different between groups. Confirms the CV benefit of GLP-1 RA in T2DM with CVD