Copyright
©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. Apr 12, 2020; 11(2): 32-42
Published online Apr 12, 2020. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.32
Published online Apr 12, 2020. doi: 10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.32
Table 1 Characteristics of the patient cohort (n = 31) who were switched from balsalazide (due to shortage) to an alternative aminosalicylate formulation
| Variable | Pre-switch (baseline) | Post-switch (at subsequent review)1 |
| Age (yr) (median, range) | 54 (20-79) | |
| Male sex (%) | 16 (51.6) | |
| Disease duration (yr) (median, range) | 10 (3-48) | |
| Montreal Classification, n (%) | ||
| Disease extent | ||
| Proctitis (E1) | 4 (12.9) | |
| Left sided colitis (E2) | 21 (67.7) | |
| Extensive colitis (E3) | 6 (19.4) | |
| Disease severity | ||
| Clinical remission (S0) | 14 (45.2) | 10 (32.2) |
| Mild (S1) | 16 (51.6) | 15 (48.4) |
| Moderate (S2) | 1 (3.2) | 6 (19.4) |
| Severe (S3) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) |
| Endoscopic (Mayo) subscore, n (%) | ||
| Mayo 0 | 6 (19.4) | 13 (41.9) |
| Mayo 1 | 9 (29.0) | 9 (29.0) |
| Mayo 2 | 13 (41.9) | 5 (16.1) |
| Mayo 3 | 3 (9.7) | 3 (9.7) |
| Endoscopic remission (Mayo 0/1) | 15 (48.4) | 22 (71.0) |
| Alternative 5-ASA formulation switched to | ||
| MMX mesalazine | 28 (90.3) | |
| Time-dependent, ethylcellulose coated2 | 2 (6.5) | |
| Sulfasalazine | 1 (3.2) | |
| Median balsalazide dose (g, range) | 5.3 (3.0-9.0) | - |
| Median equivalent mesalazine dose (g, range)3 | 2.1 (1.1-3.2) | 3.6 (2.0-4.8) |
| Concurrent Medical therapy, n (%) | ||
| Nil other | 7 (22.6) | |
| Topical aminosalicylate | 10 (32.2) | |
| Oral corticosteroid | 1 (3.2) | |
| Azathioprine/mercaptopurine | 14 (45.2) | |
| Methotrexate | 3 (9.7) | |
| Anti-TNF biologic | 0 (0.0) | |
| Other biologic | 0 (0.0) |
Table 2 Long term cumulative outcomes including rates of treatment escalation, colectomy and mortality in those who continued on alternative aminosalicylate therapy (n = 19) vs those who switched but then returned to balsalazide as soon as supply returned (n = 12), n (%)
| Outcome (cumulative) | Post-switch review (baseline), n (%) | As of 3y follow-up1, n (%) | As of 5y follow-up1, n = (%) | |||
| Alternative 5-ASA2 | Resumed alsalazide | Alternative 5-ASA2 | Resumed balsalazide | Alternative 5-ASA2 | Resumed balsalazide | |
| Escalated to immunomodulator | 14 (73.7) | 5 (41.7) | 16 (84.2) | 5 (41.7) | 16 (84.2) | 5 (41.7) |
| Escalated to biologic | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (15.8) | 0 (0) | 6 (31.6) | 2 (16.7) |
| Hospitalised for flare3 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 3 (15.8) | 0 (0) | 7 (36.8)a | 0 (0)a |
| Colectomy | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.3) | 0 (0) | 1 (5.3) | 0 (0) |
| All-cause mortality4 | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 2 (10.5) | 0 (0) | 2 (10.5) | 0 (0) |
- Citation: van Langenberg DR, Cheng RKY, Garg M. Outcomes of a drug shortage requiring switching in patients with ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2020; 11(2): 32-42
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2150-5330/full/v11/i2/32.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v11.i2.32
