In diverticular bleeding, extravasation detected by computed tomography indicates active bleeding. It is unclear whether an endoscopic procedure is the best method of hemostasis for diverticular bleeding. This retrospective study was conducted to examine the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis in preventing diverticular rebleeding with extravasation visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.This single-center, retrospective, the observational study utilized data from an endoscopic database. Adult patients admitted to our hospital due to diverticular bleeding diagnosed by colonoscopy were included. We compared the data between the extravasation-positive and extravasation-negative groups. The primary outcome was the proportion of successful hemostasis without rebleeding within 1 month after the first endoscopic procedure. Altogether, 69 patients were included in the study (n = 17, extravasation-positive group; n = 52, extravasation-negative group). The overall rebleeding rate was 30.4% (21/69). The rebleeding rate was higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group, although without a statistically significant difference. However, among the patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis, the rebleeding rate was significantly higher in the extravasation-positive group than in the extravasation-negative group (50% [8/16] vs 10.5% [2/19], p = .022). In the extravasation-positive group, all 8 patients with rebleeding underwent repeat colonoscopy. Of these, 5 patients required additional clips; bleeding was controlled in 3 patients, while arterial embolization or surgery was required for hemostasis in 2 patients. None of the remaining 3 patients with rebleeding in the extravasation-positive group required clipping; thus, their conditions were only observed.Many patients with diverticular bleeding who exhibited extravasation on computed tomography experienced rebleeding after endoscopic hemostasis. However, bleeding in more than half of these patients could be stopped by 2 endoscopic procedures, without performing transcatheter arterial embolization or surgery even if rebleeding occurred. Some serious major complications due to such invasive interventions are reported in the literature, but colonoscopic complications did not occur in our patients. Endoscopic hemostasis may be the preferred and effective first-line therapy for patients with diverticular bleeding who have extravasation, as visualized by contrast-enhanced computed tomography.

The clinical outcomes of angiography and transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) have not been completely assessed, especially according to bleeding sites. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of angiography and safety of TAE in acute GIB.

This was a retrospective study evaluating the records of 321 patients with acute GIB who underwent angiography with or without TAE. Targeted TAE was conducted in 134 patients, in whom angiography showed bleeding sources. Prophylactic TAE was performed in 29 patients when the bleeding source was not detected but a specific vessel was strongly suspected by other examinations. The rate of technical success, clinical success, and complications were analyzed.

The detection rate of bleeding source via angiography was 50.8% (163/321), which was not different according to the bleeding sites. The detection rate was higher if the probable bleeding source had already been found by another investigation (59.7% vs. 35.8%, p<0.001). TAE sites were upper GIB in 67, mid GIB in 74, and lower GIB in 22. The technical success rate was 99.3% (133/134), and the clinical success rate was 63.0% (104/163). The prophylactic embolization group showed lower clinical success rate than the targeted embolization group (44.8% vs. 67.9%, p=0.06). The TAE-related complication rate was 12.9% (21/163). Ischemia and/or infarction was more common after TAE for mid and lower GIB than for upper GIB (15.6% vs. 3.0%, p=0.007).

Angiography with or without TAE was an effective method for acute GIB. Targeted embolization should be performed if possible given that it has a higher clinical success rate.

Lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is defined as bleeding distal to the ligament of Treitz. In the UK, it represents approximately 3 % of all surgical referrals to the hospital. This review aims to provide review of the current evidence regarding the management of this condition.

Literature was searched using Medline, Pubmed, and Cochrane for relevant evidence by two researchers. This was conducted in a manner that enabled a narrative review of the evidence covering the aetiology, clinical assessment and management options of continuously bleeding patients.

The majority of patients with acute lower GI bleeding can be treated conservatively. In cases where ongoing bleeding occurs, colonoscopy is still the first line of investigation and treatment. Failure of endoscopy and persistent instability warrant angiography, possibly preceded by CT angiography and proceeding to superselective embolisation. Failure of embolisation warrants surgical intervention.

There are still many unanswered questions. In particular, the development of a more reliable predictive tool for mortality, rebleeding and requirement for surgery needs to be the ultimate priority. There are a small number of encouraging developments on combination therapy with regard to angiography, endoscopy and surgery. Additionally, the increasing use of haemostatic agents provides an additional tool for the management of bleeding endoscopically in difficult situations.

There are multiple strategies for evaluating and treating lower intestinal bleeding (LIB). Colonoscopy has become the preferred initial test for most patients with LIB because of its diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities and its safety. However, few studies have directly compared colonoscopy with other techniques and there are controversies regarding the optimal timing of colonoscopy, the importance of colon preparation, the prevalence of stigmata of hemorrhage, and the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis. Angiography, radionuclide scintigraphy, and multidetector computed tomography scanning are complementary modalities, but the requirement of active bleeding at the time of the examination limits their routine use. In addition, angiography can result in serious complications. This review summarizes the available evidence regarding colonoscopy and radiographic studies in the management of acute LIB.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is a common cause for hospital admission that results in significant morbidity and mortality. After initial resuscitation of the patient, the diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding remains a challenge for acute care surgeons. Identifying the source of bleeding can be difficult since many patients bleed intermittently or stop bleeding spontaneously. It is therefore important for the acute care surgeon to be familiar with the different diagnostic and therapeutic modalities and their advantages and disadvantages in order to guide the management of the acutely bleeding patient. This review summarizes the current methods available for the diagnosis and treatment of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding and proposes an algorithm for the management of these patients.

Lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, particularly in elderly patients. Lower endoscopic evaluation is established as the diagnostic procedure of choice in the setting of acute lower GI hemorrhage.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is one of the most common gastrointestinal indications for hospital admission, particularly in the elderly. Diverticulosis accounts for up to 50% of cases, followed by ischemic colitis and anorectal lesions. Though most patients stop bleeding spontaneously and have favorable outcomes, long-term recurrence is a substantial problem for patients with bleeding from diverticulosis and angiodysplasia. The management of LGIB is challenging because of the diverse range of bleeding sources, the large extent of bowel involved, the intermittent nature of bleeding, and the various complicated and often invasive investigative modalities. Advances in endoscopic technology have brought colonoscopy to the forefront of the management of LGIB. However, many questions remained to be answered about its usefulness in routine clinical practice. More randomized controlled trials comparing available diagnostic strategies for LGIB are needed.

Several recent advances have been made in the evaluation and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. This review focuses on the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, especially acute severe bleeding. The aim of the study was to critically review the published literature on important management issues in lower gastrointestinal bleeding, including haemodynamic resuscitation, diagnostic evaluation, and endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical therapy, and to develop an algorithm for the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, based on this literature review. Publications pertaining to lower gastrointestinal bleeding were identified by searches of the MEDLINE database for the years 1966 to December 2004. Clinical trials and review articles were specifically identified, and their reference citation lists were searched for additional publications not identified in the database searches. Clinical trials and current clinical recommendations were assessed by using commonly applied criteria. Specific recommendations are made based on the evidence reviewed. Approximately, 200 original and review articles were reviewed and graded. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence to guide the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and current endoscopic, radiologic, and surgical practices appear to reflect local expertise and availability of services. Endoscopic literature supports the role of urgent colonoscopy and therapy where possible. Radiology literature supports the role of angiography, especially after a positive bleeding scan has been obtained. Limited surgical data support the role of segmental resection in the management of persistent lower gastrointestinal bleeding after localization by either colonoscopy or angiography. There is limited high-quality research in the area of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Recent advances have improved the endoscopic, radiologic and surgical management of this problem. However, treatment decisions are still often based on local expertise and preference. With increased access to urgent therapeutic endoscopy for the management of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy can be expected to play an increasing role in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Lower gastrointestinal bleeding is defined as blood loss that originates from a source distal to the ligament of Treitz and results in hemodynamic instability or symptomatic anemia. Although approximately 10% to 15% of patients presenting with acute severe hematochezia have an upper gastrointestinal source of bleeding identified on upper endoscopy, the most common causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding are diverticulosis, hemorrhoids, ischemic colitis, and angiodysplasia. As with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, lower gastrointestinal bleeding ceases spontaneously in most cases.

We present the case of a 74 year old female patient, with clinical criteria of liver cirrhosis caused by hepatic C virus who required several admissions in our hospital over a five month period. She was given several blood transfusions because of repeated clinical manifestation of gastrointestinal bleeding without a clear origin. Her last admission was due to intermittent melenas, secondary anemia and hemodynamic angina. The patient's study included clinical analysis, fibrogastroscopy, colonoscopy, opaque enema, spiral CT and supraortic vessels arteriography. Because all the results to diagnose and locate the patient's disease were negative, she was referred to our service for a scintigraphy study. As it was an emergency case because of the patient's serious hemodynamic condition, a 99mTc-sulphur colloid scintigraphy was chosen, the results of which showed and located active gastrointestinal bleeding requiring urgent surgical intervention. The laparotomy with intrasurgical enterotomy and fibrogastroscopy undertaken ratified gastrointestinal bleeding, and the result of the biopsy of the jejunum removed in the intervention confirmed bowel angiodysplasia. Given the low incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding secondary to bowel angiodysplasia and absence of bibliographic references regarding the diagnosis of this disease in the above mentioned site by means of 99mTc-sulphur colloid scintigraphy in particular, we consider it interesting to highlight this case, in which the capability of this nuclear medicine technique for quick and non-invasive detection and location of gastrointestinal bleeding has been highly proven.

Major breakthroughs in catheter, guidewire, and other angiographic equipment currently allow interventional radiologists to diagnose massive life-threatening upper and lower GI hemorrhage and to stop the bleeding safely and effectively using superselective catheterization and microcoil embolization. Similarly, the interventional radiologist can treat acute intestinal ischemia safely and effectively with selective catheterization and papaverine administration and treat chronic mesenteric ischemia by percutaneous angioplasty and stent placement. A multidisciplinary approach, including the gastroenterologist, radiologist, and surgeon, is critical in managing GI bleeding and intestinal ischemia, particularly in patients at high risk or presenting as diagnostic dilemmas.

Among patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding, older age is associated with an increased rate of comorbidity, greater medication use, and atypical clinical presentations. The aging of the population makes the evaluation and management of gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly a special and increasingly common clinical challenge. The unique features and common causes of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the elderly are reviewed. Important management issues considered include hemodynamic resuscitation; anticoagulation; and medical, surgical, and endoscopic therapy.

Major breakthroughs in catheter and guidewire design as well as improvements in angiographic x-ray equipment currently allow interventional radiologists to diagnose massive life-threatening upper and lower GI hemorrhage and to stop the bleeding safely and effectively using superselective catheterization and microcoil embolization. For chronic or recurrent GI bleeding, when endoscopy is unrevealing or equivocal, barium studies, CT scanning, nuclear medicine studies, and angiography can help determine the cause of bleeding. A multidisciplinary approach, including the gastroenterologist, radiologist, and surgeon, is extremely helpful in managing GI bleeding, particularly in high-risk patients or patients presenting as diagnostic dilemmas.

Severe gastrointestinal bleeding has historically been a clinical problem primarily under the purview of the general surgeon. Diagnostic advances made as the result of newer technologies, such as fiberoptic and video endoscopy, selective visceral arteriography, and nuclear scintigraphy, have permitted more accurate and targeted operations. More importantly, they have led to safe, effective nonoperative therapeutic interventions that have obviated the need for surgery in many patients. Today, most gastrointestinal bleeding episodes are initially managed by endoscopic or angiographic control measures. Such interventions are often definitive in obtaining hemostasis. Even temporary cessation or attenuation of massive bleeding in an unstable patient permits a safer, more controlled operative procedure by allowing an adequate period of preoperative resuscitation. Despite the less frequent need for surgical intervention, traditional operative approaches, such as suture ligation, lesion or organ excision, vagotomy, portasystemic anastomosis, and devascularization procedures, continue to be life-saving in many instances. The proliferation of laparoscopic surgery has fostered the application of minimally invasive techniques to highly selected patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Intraoperative endoscopy has greatly facilitated the accuracy of laparoscopic surgery by endoscopic localization of bleeding lesions requiring excision. It is anticipated that the evolving technologies pertinent to the diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal bleeding will continue to promote collaboration and cooperation between gastroenterologists, radiologists, and surgeons.

Aging is associated with an increased rate of comorbidity, greater medication use, and atypical clinical presentations. The aging of the population makes the evaluation and management of gastrointestinal bleeding in older people a special and increasingly common clinical challenge. The unique features and common causes of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in older people are reviewed. Important management issues considered include hemodynamic resuscitation, anticoagulation, and endoscopic and surgical therapy.

Selective mesenteric angiography is an expensive, invasive, diagnostic, and therapeutic tool for lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Some institutions have required a positive nuclear medicine bleeding scan before angiography. We have attempted to determine if this is a valid screening test for mesenteric angiography. Are there any other factors to predict which patients are actively bleeding and who will benefit from angiography?

All cases of mesenteric angiography for hemorrhage performed during a 12-year period were reviewed.

A total of 131 angiograms were performed during a 12-year period with 45 patients demonstrating active bleeding; 54 patients had a bleeding scan before angiography. A positive bleeding scan did not increase the percentage of positive angiograms. A history of prior gastrointestinal bleeding, transfusions, orthostatic hypotension, or tachycardia were not predictors for a positive angiogram.

This study could not identify any single useful predictor that will increase the likelihood of obtaining a positive angiogram. Nuclear medicine scans should not be used routinely as a screening test for angiography.

Upper GI bleeding is a serious and common emergency. Most upper GI bleeding will stop spontaneously but determining which patients will continue to bleed or rebleed is very difficult in the ED. Resuscitation and stabilization are the primary goals of the emergency physician. Hemorrhage control with pharmacotherapy or balloon tamponade may be necessary until urgent or emergent consultation with a gastroenterologist or surgeon is obtained. Early detection and treatment of H. pylori and the development of safer NSAIDs should alter the future of upper GI bleeding dramatically.

Profuse bright rectal bleeding from anorectal varices is a serious but rare condition which can be difficult to diagnose. The case of a 47 year old man with bleeding anorectal varix is reported, with a discussion of the diagnostic difficulties, investigation and treatment.

Methods of diagnosis and treatment of lower gastrointestinal bleeding depend on the rate of bleeding and the amount of blood lost. If bleeding is occult, colonoscopy is the single best way to determine the source, if bleeding is gross but mild, causing melena or small amounts of hematochezia, colonoscopy or a combination of flexible sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium enema should be used to evaluate the colon. In most patients with melena, the upper tract must be examined endoscopically. Acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding stops spontaneously in 75 to 90 per cent of patients, permitting preparation of the colon before colonoscopy. If bleeding is continuing, diagnostic options include colonoscopy with no preparation of the colon, relying on the cathartic effect of blood, or a red cell radionuclide scan followed by angiography if the scan is positive. A bleeding lesion seen on angiography is usually treated by infusion of vasopressin. Colonoscopic treatment of a bleeding site uses the BICAP probe, heater probe, or argon laser. Patients who bleed severely and those who do not respond to treatment or rebleed after treatment are candidates for operation. Segmental resection is preferred if the bleeding site is known. If not, total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis may be necessary. A mortality rate of 10 to 15 per cent in patients with severe bleeding reflects the advanced age of many of these patients and the difficulty of managing gastrointestinal bleeding in the presence of associated medical conditions.

Although most often clinically silent, colonic diverticula are responsible for a large number of gastrointestinal illnesses in our society. Complications of diverticular disease, including perforation and hemorrhage, may occur in 15% to 20% of patients with diverticula during their lifetime, and although often mild and self-limiting diseases, they too frequently cause life-threatening problems that require prompt surgical intervention. Despite a cadre of sophisticated laboratory and radiologic tests that have been developed to aid in the diagnosis of complicated diverticular disease, the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis still relies heavily on patient history, physical examination, physician judgment, and the patient's clinical response to treatment. Thus it is important for the managing physician to fully understand the pathogenesis of diverticula, the clinical consequences and modes of presentation of complicated diverticular disease, and the array of interventions available for treatment of these problems. This monograph summarizes our knowledge of diverticular disease to date and tries to give specific guidelines for the treatment of patients with complicated diverticulitis. However, it must be understood that the presentation and severity of these complications vary widely from patient to patient. Thus one cannot take a single approach toward a patient who has diverticulitis or diverticular bleeding. Rather, successful outcomes depend on an individual approach to each patient while maintaining certain generally accepted principles of treatment.

Nineteen patients with a prosthetic infrarenal aortic graft and gastrointestinal bleeding were managed over a 7 year period. Graft-to-enteric fistula, identified in five patients, was the most common cause of bleeding. Other causes included bowel ischemia (four patients) and peptic ulcer disease (three patients). Clinical signs of infection, such as fever and leukocytosis, were common in patients with graft-to-enteric fistula and bowel ischemia. Most of these patients will benefit from a prompt evaluation and expedient operation.

We have reviewed 50 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding treated by endoscopic bipolar electrocoagulation (BPEC) and assessed its value in the management of massive bleeding. Initial hemostasis was achieved in 94% of cases with an overall rebleeding rate of 19.1%. The rebleeding rate was high among patients requiring blood transfusions more than 2,000 ml (47.3%) and those with acute gastric mucosal lesion (AGML) (35.3%). In AGML one or two primary sites of bleeding can be effectively controlled initially, but rebleeding tends to occur from other sites. Mortality from the direct effects of bleeding was also high in massive bleeders (33.3%) and those with AGML (22.2%); the overall mortality, including deaths from ongoing underlying diseases, was 38%. Although BPEC failed to alter the fatal outcome of patients with massive acute mucosal bleeding, permanent or temporary hemostasis contributed to reducing the amount of blood transfusions, avoiding emergency operation, preventing rapid deterioration and prolonging the survival time. Endoscopic BPEC has proven to be an effective emergency hemostatic method in massive bleeding of the upper gastrointestinal tract as an alternative to surgical intervention.

We report two cirrhotic patients who succumbed to massive rectal bleeding. The source of this hemorrhage remained undiscovered clinically despite endoscopy, a bleeding scan, and celiac angiogram in one patient. Autopsy revealed that the source of the bleeding was rectal varices in both cases.