Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. May 28, 2016; 8(5): 506-512
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.506
Published online May 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.506
Table 1 Examples of credentialing in radiology across the world
| Examples | Institute/country | Date |
| Brain PET/MRI | Joint statement: American College of Radiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, United States[5] | 2015 |
| Cardiac CT | British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging, United Kingdom[26] | 2011 |
| Cardiovascular MRI | Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, United States[15,16] | 2000, 2007 |
| CT colonography | The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, through the Abdominal Radiology Group of Australia and New Zealand[27] | 2013 |
| Interventional radiology | Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia, Australia and New Zealand[28] | 2008 |
| Screening mammograms | Mammography Quality and Standards Act Program, United States Food and Drug Administration[29] | 2015 |
| Training in catheter-directed intra-arterial stroke therapy | Society of Interventional Radiology, United States[7] | 2009 |
| Training in Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology | Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Endovascular Surgical Neuroradiology training programme, United States[30] | 2008, 2011, 2013 |
| Ultrasound training standards | Royal College of Radiologists, United Kingdom[31] | 2012 |
Table 2 A complete case example of credentialing in radiology, from the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists computed tomography colonography accreditation programme guidelines[27]
| Modality/country and Institute | Credentialing requirements |
| CTC | Minimum of 60 CTC cases required by practitioner for independent performance: |
| RANZCR, through the Abdominal Radiology Group of Australia and New Zealand, 2013[27] | Cases should be worked up from raw data on a workstation by applicant 50 cases must be validated by surgery or endoscopy |
| 10 cases should be "live" where: Practitioner must be personally present for duration of examination | |
| Must be supervised by a recognised CTC radiologist | |
| Practitioner must be named on examination report as the co-reporting CTC trainee | |
| Form of evidence: RIS record ± logbook | |
| Case training can be acquired through the following: | |
| Hands-on workshops | |
| Abdominal imaging fellowships | |
| On-site training via the supervision of a CTC specialist | |
| Mentored electronic library cases | |
| On-going competency: To maintain CTC competency a minimum of 30 examinations per year must be interpreted | |
| All cases worked up by applicant from raw data on a workstation | |
| All cases must be recorded in RANZCR CTC logbook | |
| In their annual RANZCR CPD returns CTC specialists must declare whether they have completed their on-going requirements. Their declaration will be subject to random audit and CTC specialists may be asked to provide evidence to substantiate their logbook recordings | |
| Those who do not maintain competency requirements will be suspended from the register, until a logbook of 30 cases is submitted[27] |
- Citation: Youssef A, McCoubrie P. Credentialing in radiology: Current practice and future challenges. World J Radiol 2016; 8(5): 506-512
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i5/506.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i5.506
