Vos LJ, Janoski M, Wachowicz K, Yahya A, Boychak O, Amanie J, Pervez N, Parliament MB, Pituskin E, Fallone BG, Usmani N. Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance. World J Radiol 2016; 8(4): 410-418 [PMID: 27158428 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Nawaid Usmani, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, 11560 University Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada. nawaid.usmani@albertahealthservices.ca
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Clinical Trials Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 2 Qualitative determination of index of suspicion
Procedure step
Structure examined
Index of suspicion assessment
1
Assign region
Base
Superior most margin of prostate to the widest transverse diameter
Midgland
Widest transverse diameter to ejaculatory ducts at verumontanum
Apex
Inferior to midgland
2
Peripheral zone
Consider T2 features
4: Moderate low signal with mass like appearance
3: Mild low signal with mass like appearance
2: Mild low signal which is focal but not clearly mass like, moderate diffuse low signal
1: Mild low signal, diffuse and/or feathered, linear low signal
0: Normal signal
Consider DWI features
4: Definite abnormality (high DWI and low ADC relative to background)
3: Probable abnormality (low ADC)
2: Possible abnormality (mild decrease ADC or increase DWI)
1: Mottled
0: Homogeneous ADC or low DWI
Consider DCE features
4: Rapid early enhancement, wash out
3: Rapid early enhancement, remaining strong and prolonged
2: Mild early enhancement, plateau or progressive
1: No early upstroke, progressive enhancement
0: No enhancement
Assign combined score
3
Central gland
Consider T2 features
4: Mass like low T2 signal with invasion into AFMS or peripheral zone/disrupted surgical capsule, irregularly or poorly marginated mass like low T2 signal without a capsule
3: Mass like homogeneous low T2 signal with no capsule, preserved surgical capsule
2: Diffuse heterogeneous signal with intact surgical capsule
1: Encapsulated nodules
0: Normal
4
Fibromuscular stroma
Assess for presence of disease
5
Extracapsular extension
Assess for presence of disease
6
Seminal vesicles
Assess for presence of disease
Table 3 Patient’s demographics and disease characteristics at baseline
Density of tumor in positive biopsy cores (% of core), median (range)
10 (1-60)
HGPIN, n (% of total)
6 (26.1)
PNI, n (% of total)
4 (17.4)
LVI, n (% of total)
0 (0.0)
Table 4 Prostate cancer visualization with magnetic resonance imaging
n = 23
Number of scans with baseline IOS of:
1
8
2
5
3
3
4
2
5
5
Number of follow-up MRI scans, median (range)
3 (0-4)
Number of follow-up scans with signs of disease progression
3
Number of follow-up scans with changed IOS
1
Citation: Vos LJ, Janoski M, Wachowicz K, Yahya A, Boychak O, Amanie J, Pervez N, Parliament MB, Pituskin E, Fallone BG, Usmani N. Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance. World J Radiol 2016; 8(4): 410-418