Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2016; 8(4): 410-418
Published online Apr 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410
Published online Apr 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410
Table 1 Parameters of magnetic resonance imaging
Protocol | Sequence | Repetitiontime (ms) | Echo time(ms) | Flip angle | Slice thickness (mm) | Field of view | Matrixsize | Voxel size (mm × mm) | Reconstructed | Averages | Acquisition |
(°) | (AP × RL) | voxel size | time | ||||||||
(mm × mm) | (mm × mm) | (min:s) | |||||||||
Sagittal T2-weighted | FSE | 3000 | 100 | 90 exc. | 5 | 160 × 160 | 224 × 216 | 0.71 × 0.74 | 0.63 × 0.63 | 6 | 3:42 |
(18 echoes) | 135 refoc. | ||||||||||
T1-weighted | FSE | 700 | 11 | 90 exc. | 5 | 160 × 160 | 400 × 319 | 0.4 × 0.5 | 0.4 × 0.4 | 3 | 4:54 |
(7 echoes) | 145 refoc. | ||||||||||
T2-weighted | FSE | 3000 | 100 | 90 exc. | 5 | 160 × 160 | 400 × 317 | 0.4 × 0.5 | 0.4 × 0.4 | 3 | 5:48 |
(17 echoes) | 145 refoc. | ||||||||||
Diffusion weighted | Single-shot EPI | 2500 | 64 | 90 exc. | 4 | 160 × 144 | 80 × 59 | 2.00 × 2.42 | 1.25 × 1.24 | 61 | 4:02 |
1 mm gap | |||||||||||
dynamic contrast-enhanced | 3D-FFE | 4.4 | 2.1 | 15 exc. | 5 | 260 × 260 | 128 × 102 | 2.03 × 2.52 | 1.02 × 1.02 | 2 | 6:37 |
T2 map | TSE | 1300 | N × 30 | 90 exc. | 5 | 160 × 1602 | 160 × 160 | 1.00 × 1.25 | 0.63 × 0.63 | 2 | 10:323 |
(6 echoes) | 180 refoc. |
Table 2 Qualitative determination of index of suspicion
Procedure step | Structure examined | Index of suspicion assessment | |
1 | Assign region | Base | Superior most margin of prostate to the widest transverse diameter |
Midgland | Widest transverse diameter to ejaculatory ducts at verumontanum | ||
Apex | Inferior to midgland | ||
2 | Peripheral zone | Consider T2 features | 4: Moderate low signal with mass like appearance |
3: Mild low signal with mass like appearance | |||
2: Mild low signal which is focal but not clearly mass like, moderate diffuse low signal | |||
1: Mild low signal, diffuse and/or feathered, linear low signal | |||
0: Normal signal | |||
Consider DWI features | 4: Definite abnormality (high DWI and low ADC relative to background) | ||
3: Probable abnormality (low ADC) | |||
2: Possible abnormality (mild decrease ADC or increase DWI) | |||
1: Mottled | |||
0: Homogeneous ADC or low DWI | |||
Consider DCE features | 4: Rapid early enhancement, wash out | ||
3: Rapid early enhancement, remaining strong and prolonged | |||
2: Mild early enhancement, plateau or progressive | |||
1: No early upstroke, progressive enhancement | |||
0: No enhancement | |||
Assign combined score | |||
3 | Central gland | Consider T2 features | 4: Mass like low T2 signal with invasion into AFMS or peripheral zone/disrupted surgical capsule, irregularly or poorly marginated mass like low T2 signal without a capsule |
3: Mass like homogeneous low T2 signal with no capsule, preserved surgical capsule | |||
2: Diffuse heterogeneous signal with intact surgical capsule | |||
1: Encapsulated nodules | |||
0: Normal | |||
4 | Fibromuscular stroma | Assess for presence of disease | |
5 | Extracapsular extension | Assess for presence of disease | |
6 | Seminal vesicles | Assess for presence of disease |
Table 3 Patient’s demographics and disease characteristics at baseline
Characteristic | Value |
Age (yr), median (range) | 65 (51-75) |
PSA (ng/mL), median (range) | 6.4 (1.4-14.3) |
Clinical stage, n (% of total) | |
cT1c | 20 (87.0) |
cT2a | 2 (8.7) |
cT2b | 1 (4.3) |
Gleason score 6 (3 + 3), n (% of total) | 23 (100%) |
% of cores positive per patient, median (range) | 8.3 (01-58.3) |
Density of tumor in positive biopsy cores (% of core), median (range) | 10 (1-60) |
HGPIN, n (% of total) | 6 (26.1) |
PNI, n (% of total) | 4 (17.4) |
LVI, n (% of total) | 0 (0.0) |
Table 4 Prostate cancer visualization with magnetic resonance imaging
n = 23 | |
Number of scans with baseline IOS of: | |
1 | 8 |
2 | 5 |
3 | 3 |
4 | 2 |
5 | 5 |
Number of follow-up MRI scans, median (range) | 3 (0-4) |
Number of follow-up scans with signs of disease progression | 3 |
Number of follow-up scans with changed IOS | 1 |
- Citation: Vos LJ, Janoski M, Wachowicz K, Yahya A, Boychak O, Amanie J, Pervez N, Parliament MB, Pituskin E, Fallone BG, Usmani N. Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance. World J Radiol 2016; 8(4): 410-418
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i4/410.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i4.410