Copyright
©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Radiol. Nov 28, 2016; 8(11): 851-856
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i11.851
Published online Nov 28, 2016. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i11.851
Disease | Clinical role | First author | Publish year | No. of patients | Tracer(s) compared to FDG | Primary results |
Prostate cancer | Diagnosis | Liu | 2016 | Meta-analysis 56 trials 3586 patients | 11C-choline 18F-choline, 11C-acetate | 18F-choline AUC 0.94, 95%CI: 0.92-0.96; 11C-choline AUC 0.89, 95%CI: 0.86-0.91; 11C-acetate AUC 0.78, 95%CI: 0.74-0.81; FDG AUC 0.73, 95%CI: 0.69-0.77 |
Detection | Wata-nabe | 2010 | 43 | 11C-choline | Sensitivity 73%, 88%, and 31% for 11C-choline, MRI, and FDG, respectively | |
Re-staging | Richter | 2010 | 73 | 11C-choline | Sensitivity was 60.6% for 11C-choline and 31% for FDG | |
Hepato-cellular carcioma | Detection, metastatic | Ho | 2007 | 121 | 11C-acetate | Patient-based sensitivity for metastasis was 64% and 79% for 11C-cetate and FDG, respectively |
Detection, primary | Ho | 2003 | 57 | 11C-acetate | Sensitivity was 87% and 47% for 11C-acetate and FDG respectively | |
Detection, primary/metastatic | Park | 2008 | 112 | 11C-acetate | Sensitivity was 75%, 61%, and 83% for 11C-acetate, FDG, and dual-tracer PET.CT, respectively | |
Detection, primary | Larsson | 2012 | 44 | 11C-acetate | Detection rate was 34/44 for 11C-acetate and 13/44 for FDG (P < 0.001) | |
Detection, primary | Talbot | 2010 | 81 | 18F-choline | Sensitivity was 88% for 18F-choline vs 68% for FDG | |
Detection | Wu | 2011 | 76 | 11C-choline | 11C-choline PET was positive in 28 patients with negative FDG PET | |
Diagnosis | Castilla-Lievre | 2016 | 28 | 11C-choline | Sensitivity was 75%, 36%, and 93% for 11C-holine, FDG, and dual tracers, respectively | |
Malignant glioma | Diagnosis | Yama-moto | 2008 | 15 | 11C-acetate, 11C-methi-onine | Sensitivity was 90%, 100%, and 40% for 11C-acetate, 11C-methionine, and FDG, respectively |
Re-staging | Tan | 2011 | 55 | 11C-choline | Sensitivity/specificity was 92%/88%, 87%/81%, and 77%/63% for 11C-choline, MRI, and FDG, respectively | |
Nasopha-ryngeal cancer | Staging | Wu | 2011 | 15 | 11C-choline | Sensitivity for detecting locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer was 100% vs 86% percent for 11C-choline and FDG, respectively |
Multiple myeloma | Staging | Lin | 2014 | 15 | 11C-acetate | Diffuse infiltration was detected in 100% of patients with 11C-acetate vs 40% with FDG |
Re-staging | Cassou-Mounat | 2016 | 21 | 18F-choline | 18F-fluorocholine detected 75% more lesions, and with higher intra-observer agreement than FDG (kappa score 0.89 vs 0.81) | |
Renal cell carcinoma | Diagnosis | Oyama | 2014 | 29 | 11C-acetate | Detection rate was 72% for 11C-acetate vs 22% for FDG |
- Citation: Kwee SA, Lim J. Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging of cancer: Pairing lipid metabolism with glycolysis. World J Radiol 2016; 8(11): 851-856
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v8/i11/851.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i11.851