Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Radiol. Oct 28, 2013; 5(10): 372-380
Published online Oct 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i10.372
Published online Oct 28, 2013. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i10.372
Table 1 Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameters
TE | EE | PE | TW | EW | ||||||
Enhancement present | Early (0-1 s with respect to normal lung) | Late (≥ 2 s later than normal lung) | Marked | Moderate | Homogeneous | - | - | - | - | - |
Enhancement absent | Stop assessing CEUS parameters | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
Wash-out | Early ( < 60 s) | Late (≥ 60 s) | Marked | Mild | Absent |
Table 2 Final diagnoses
Non-neoplastic lesions | n | Neoplastic lesions | Lost at follow-up (n) | |||
Primary tumors | n | Metastatic tumors (origin) | n | |||
Slow resolution pneumonia | 19 | Adenocarcinoma | 18 | Colon | 5 | 5 |
BOOP | 5 | Squamous carcinoma | 5 | Stomach | 2 | |
Abscess | 4 | Small-cell lung cancer | 3 | Testis (seminoma) | 2 | |
Pulmonary infarction | 3 | Indifferentiate carcinoma | 6 | Liver (HCC) | 1 | |
Organized pleural effusion | 4 | Sarcomatoid carcinoma | 2 | Breast | 1 | |
Post-surgical fibrosis | 4 | Mesothelioma | 2 | Indeterminate | 2 | |
Obstruction atelectasys | 2 | Schwannoma | 2 | |||
Fibrotic plaque of the pleura | 1 | Plasmacytoma | 1 | |||
Lymphoma | 1 | |||||
40 | 13 | |||||
Total | 42 | 53 | 5 |
Table 3 Enhancement and wash-out findings in non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions n (%)
Enhancement | Wash-out | |||||||||||
Early | Delayed | Absent | Marked | Moderate | Homogeneous | Inhomogeneous | Marked | Mild | Absent | Early | Late | |
Non-neoplastic lesions | 28/42 | 2/42 | 12/42 | 25/30 | 5/30 | 18/30 | 12/30 | 0/30 | 11/30 | 19/30 | 0/30 | 11/30 |
(66.7) | (4.8) | (28.6) | (83.3) | (16.7) | (60) | (40) | (0) | (36.7) | (63.3) | (0) | (36.7) | |
Neoplastic lesions | 3/53 | 50/53 | 0/53 | 29/53 | 24/53 | 6/53 | 47/53 | 16/53 | 36/53 | 1/53 | 26/53 | 26/53 |
(5.7) | (94.3) | (0) | (54.7) | (4.3) | (11.3) | (88.7) | (30.2) | (67.9) | (1.9) | (49) | (49) |
Table 4 Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio of enhnacement and wash-out parameters
Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV | PLR | NLR | ||
95%CI | 95%CI | 95%CI | 95%CI | 95%CI | 95%CI | ||
Present | 100 | 28.6 | 63.9 | 100 | 1.4 | 0 | |
100-100 | 14.9-42.2 | 53.5-74.2 | 100-100 | 1.21-1.59 | -- | ||
Early | 5.7 | 6.7 | 9.7 | 3.8 | 0.06 | 14.15 | |
-0.719 | -17.9 | -20.8 | -10.5 | -2.24 | 12.8-15.5 | ||
Delayed | 94.3 | 95.2 | 96.2 | 93 | 19.81 | 0.06 | |
Enhancement | 88.1-100.6 | 88.8-101.7 | 90.9-101 | 85.4-100.6 | 18.4-21.2 | -2.2 | |
Marked | 54.7 | 16.7 | 53.7 | 17.2 | 0.66 | 2.72 | |
41.3-68.1 | 3.3-30 | 40.4-67 | 3.5-31 | 0.36-0.95 | 1.86-3.57 | ||
Moderate | 45.3 | 83.3 | 82.8 | 46.3 | 2.72 | 0.66 | |
31.9-58.7 | 70-96.7 | 69-96.5 | 33-59.6 | 1.86-3.57 | 0.36-0.95 | ||
Homogeneous | 11.3 | 40 | 25 | 20.3 | 0.19 | 2.22 | |
2.8-19.9 | 22.5-57.5 | 7.7-42.3 | 10.1-30.6 | -1.62 | 1.77-2.67 | ||
Inhomogeneous | 88.7 | 60 | 79.7 | 75 | 2.22 | 0.19 | |
80.1-97.2 | 42.5-77.5 | 69.4-89.9 | 57.7-92.3 | 1.77-2.67 | -1.62 | ||
Marked | 30.8 | 100 | 100 | 23.4 | -- | 0.69 | |
18.2-43.3 | 100-100 | 100-100 | 11.3-35.5 | 0.5-0.87 | |||
Wash-out | Mild | 69.2 | 0 | 76.6 | 0 | 0.69 | -- |
56.7-81.8 | 64.5-88.7 | 0.5-0.87 | |||||
Absent | 98.1 | 63.3 | 82.5 | 95 | 2.68 | 0.03 | |
94.5-101.8 | 46.1-80.6 | 73.2-91.9 | 85-104.6 | 2.2-3.15 | -3.92 | ||
Early | 50 | 100 | 100 | 29.7 | -- | 0.5 | |
36.4-63.6 | 100-100 | 100-100 | 15-44.5 | 0.23-0.77 | |||
Late | 50 | 0 | 70.3 | 0 | 0.5 | -- | |
36.4-63.6 | 55.5-85 | 0.23-0.8 |
Table 5 Arbitrary score based on the ratio between the positive predictive value calculated for each contrast-enhanced ultrasonography parameter
PPV | Score | ||
Enhancement | Absent | 63.9 | 0 |
Early | 9.7 | 1 | |
Delayed | 96.2 | 9.9 | |
Marked | 53.7 | 1 | |
Moderate | 82.8 | 1.5 | |
Homogeneous | 25 | 1 | |
Inhomogeneous | 79.7 | 3.2 | |
Wash-out | Marked | 100 | 1.3 |
Mild | 76.7 | 1 | |
Absent | 69.3 | 0 | |
Early | 100 | 1.4 | |
Late | 70.3 | 1 |
- Citation: Sartori S, Postorivo S, Vece FD, Ermili F, Tassinari D, Tombesi P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in peripheral lung consolidations: What’s its actual role? World J Radiol 2013; 5(10): 372-380
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i10/372.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v5.i10.372