BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2026; 18(6): 120315
Published online Jun 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120315
Table 1 Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grading system for knee osteoarthritis
Grade
Description
0No radiographic features of osteoarthritis
1Doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping
2Definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing
3Moderate multiple osteophytes, definite joint space narrowing, some sclerosis, and possible bone deformity
4Large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis, and definite bone deformity
Table 2 Comparison of semiquantitative magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems for knee osteoarthritis relevant to genicular artery embolization (whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score, Boston-Leeds osteoarthritis knee score, and magnetic resonance imaging osteoarthritis knee score)
Feature
WORMS
BLOKS
MOAKS
Primary goalWhole-organ assessment across 14 knee subregionsFocuses on lesion detailUnified system integrating the best aspects of WORMS and BLOKS
Synovitis assessmentCombined score for effusion and synovitis; did not separately quantify themSeparated effusion from Hoffa’s fat pad synovitisDual scoring: Evaluates Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis and effusion-synovitis separately (0-3 scale)
BMLsGraded by size in various subregionsMore granular scoring for BML size and numberSimplified grading (0-3) by size with a clearer, more reproducible definition
Meniscal damageCombined tear types and extrusion into one metricMore detailed evaluation, including hypertrophy and macerationImproved percentage-of-area scoring to enhance sensitivity to small changes. Meniscal damage is scored by tear/maceration status and extent in each meniscal subregion, with separate assessment of meniscal extrusion (0-3 scale for extrusion)
ReliabilityGood but not perfect; some features overlapImproved inter-reader reliability for specific featuresHighest clinical adoption; achieves substantial-to-excellent agreement (Kappa 0.61-1.0)
GAE applicationUsed to summarize whole-joint MRI disease burden in GAE cohorts. Can support prognostic modeling when WORMS subscores are used as imaging inputsUseful for separating synovial membrane thickening from joint fluid on non-contrast MRI. Supports synovitis-phenotype characterization relevant to GAE candidate selectionSupports characterization of the synovitis-phenotype. Provides a standardized framework for candidate selection. Correlates baseline synovial/cartilage health to clinical pain response
Table 3 Genicular artery anatomy and common variants
Artery
Typical origin
Common variants
Superior lateralPopliteal arteryEarly branching, accessory vessels
Superior medialPopliteal arteryShared origin with DGA from SFA
Inferior lateralPopliteal arteryOrigin from anterior tibial artery
Inferior medialPopliteal arteryMultiple branches, anastomoses
Descending genicularSFA (adductor canal)Shared origin with SMGA
Table 4 Expected post-genicular artery embolization imaging findings by follow-up interval (0-12 months)
Modality
0-1 month (early)
1-3 months (intermediate)
6-12 months (long-term)
Radiography (X-ray)No structural response expected. Primary role is safety to exclude fracture or rapid collapseOA hallmarks (osteophytes, joint space narrowing) remain unchanged; not considered a response biomarkerUseful mainly for longitudinal progression tracking in research cohorts
MRIMay show decreased synovial enhancement transient subchondral marrow signal abnormalities may be seen early and warrant interval reassessmentMost consistent imaging response window: Decreased synovial enhancement/thickness; Effusion-synovitis often trends downwardReduced synovitis generally persists; cartilage loss and osteophytes remain stable and non-reversible
Table 5 Post-genicular artery embolization imaging interpretation guide for knee osteoarthritis showing expected response patterns
Category
Imaging findings and interpretation
Expected response patternsReduced synovial enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI. Reduced synovial thickness/volume. Lower effusion-synovitis grade when scored. Interval normalization of early marrow signal changes when present
Table 6 Post-genicular artery embolization imaging interpretation guide for knee osteoarthritis showing common pitfalls
Category
Imaging findings and interpretation
Interpretive pitfallsPersistent osteophytes should not be interpreted as treatment failure. Static cartilage defects should not be interpreted as treatment failure. No change in joint space narrowing on radiography does not exclude clinical response. Early focal T1-hypointense subchondral signal should not be labeled osteonecrosis without follow-up


Write to the Help Desk