Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2026; 18(6): 120315
Published online Jun 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120315
Published online Jun 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.120315
Table 1 Kellgren-Lawrence radiographic grading system for knee osteoarthritis
| Grade | Description |
| 0 | No radiographic features of osteoarthritis |
| 1 | Doubtful joint space narrowing and possible osteophytic lipping |
| 2 | Definite osteophytes and possible joint space narrowing |
| 3 | Moderate multiple osteophytes, definite joint space narrowing, some sclerosis, and possible bone deformity |
| 4 | Large osteophytes, marked joint space narrowing, severe sclerosis, and definite bone deformity |
Table 2 Comparison of semiquantitative magnetic resonance imaging scoring systems for knee osteoarthritis relevant to genicular artery embolization (whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score, Boston-Leeds osteoarthritis knee score, and magnetic resonance imaging osteoarthritis knee score)
| Feature | WORMS | BLOKS | MOAKS |
| Primary goal | Whole-organ assessment across 14 knee subregions | Focuses on lesion detail | Unified system integrating the best aspects of WORMS and BLOKS |
| Synovitis assessment | Combined score for effusion and synovitis; did not separately quantify them | Separated effusion from Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis | Dual scoring: Evaluates Hoffa’s fat pad synovitis and effusion-synovitis separately (0-3 scale) |
| BMLs | Graded by size in various subregions | More granular scoring for BML size and number | Simplified grading (0-3) by size with a clearer, more reproducible definition |
| Meniscal damage | Combined tear types and extrusion into one metric | More detailed evaluation, including hypertrophy and maceration | Improved percentage-of-area scoring to enhance sensitivity to small changes. Meniscal damage is scored by tear/maceration status and extent in each meniscal subregion, with separate assessment of meniscal extrusion (0-3 scale for extrusion) |
| Reliability | Good but not perfect; some features overlap | Improved inter-reader reliability for specific features | Highest clinical adoption; achieves substantial-to-excellent agreement (Kappa 0.61-1.0) |
| GAE application | Used to summarize whole-joint MRI disease burden in GAE cohorts. Can support prognostic modeling when WORMS subscores are used as imaging inputs | Useful for separating synovial membrane thickening from joint fluid on non-contrast MRI. Supports synovitis-phenotype characterization relevant to GAE candidate selection | Supports characterization of the synovitis-phenotype. Provides a standardized framework for candidate selection. Correlates baseline synovial/cartilage health to clinical pain response |
Table 3 Genicular artery anatomy and common variants
| Artery | Typical origin | Common variants |
| Superior lateral | Popliteal artery | Early branching, accessory vessels |
| Superior medial | Popliteal artery | Shared origin with DGA from SFA |
| Inferior lateral | Popliteal artery | Origin from anterior tibial artery |
| Inferior medial | Popliteal artery | Multiple branches, anastomoses |
| Descending genicular | SFA (adductor canal) | Shared origin with SMGA |
Table 4 Expected post-genicular artery embolization imaging findings by follow-up interval (0-12 months)
| Modality | 0-1 month (early) | 1-3 months (intermediate) | 6-12 months (long-term) |
| Radiography (X-ray) | No structural response expected. Primary role is safety to exclude fracture or rapid collapse | OA hallmarks (osteophytes, joint space narrowing) remain unchanged; not considered a response biomarker | Useful mainly for longitudinal progression tracking in research cohorts |
| MRI | May show decreased synovial enhancement transient subchondral marrow signal abnormalities may be seen early and warrant interval reassessment | Most consistent imaging response window: Decreased synovial enhancement/thickness; Effusion-synovitis often trends downward | Reduced synovitis generally persists; cartilage loss and osteophytes remain stable and non-reversible |
Table 5 Post-genicular artery embolization imaging interpretation guide for knee osteoarthritis showing expected response patterns
| Category | Imaging findings and interpretation |
| Expected response patterns | Reduced synovial enhancement on contrast-enhanced MRI. Reduced synovial thickness/volume. Lower effusion-synovitis grade when scored. Interval normalization of early marrow signal changes when present |
Table 6 Post-genicular artery embolization imaging interpretation guide for knee osteoarthritis showing common pitfalls
| Category | Imaging findings and interpretation |
| Interpretive pitfalls | Persistent osteophytes should not be interpreted as treatment failure. Static cartilage defects should not be interpreted as treatment failure. No change in joint space narrowing on radiography does not exclude clinical response. Early focal T1-hypointense subchondral signal should not be labeled osteonecrosis without follow-up |
- Citation: Singh R, Makary MS. Multimodality imaging considerations for genicular artery embolization in knee osteoarthritis. World J Radiol 2026; 18(6): 120315
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i6/120315.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.120315