BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026.
World J Radiol. Feb 28, 2026; 18(2): 115249
Published online Feb 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i2.115249
Table 1 Artifact evaluation on cone-beam computed tomography with original reconstruction and streak metal artifact reduction technique reconstruction with full volume of interest
Artifact type
Original
SMART-Full
χ²
P value
N
Y
Total
RadialN51152
Y19221
Total7037314.45< 0.001
StreakN69069
Y404
Total730732.25< 0.001
ThickeningN42648
Y141125
Total5617732.4500.118
Dark streakN202
Y452671
Total47267343.022< 0.001
Table 2 Artifact evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography images with iterative streak metal artifact reduction technique reconstruction using full volume of interest and small volume of interest
Artifact type
SMART-Full
SMART-Small
χ²P value
N
Y
Total
RadialN64450
Y02323
Total6677342.023< 0.001
StreakN61869
Y044
Total6112736.1250.008
ThickeningN51556
Y21517
Total5320730.5710.453
Dark streakN361147
Y02626
Total3637739.091< 0.001
Table 3 Paired sample t-test results of original cone-beam computed tomography and streak metal artifacts reduction technique with a full volume of interest reconstructed cone-beam computed tomography (n = 73), mean ± SD
Variables
Original
SMART-Full
Mean difference
t (df)
P value
Cohen’s d
Puncture needle diameter2.05 ± 0.592.16 ± 0.52-0.12-4.48 (72)< 0.001-0.53
ROI minimum density-926.12 ± 206.22-788.34 ± 299.63-137.78-5.93 (72)< 0.001-0.69
ROI maximum density18.88 ± 287.832.52 ± 260.4516.360.82 (72)0.4140.1
ROI average density-483.77 ± 269.29-426.76 ± 302.13-57.01-5.40 (72)< 0.001-0.63