Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Radiol. Dec 28, 2024; 16(12): 722-748
Published online Dec 28, 2024. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v16.i12.722
Table 1 Frisén Scale - papilledema grading system
Frisén Scale - papilledema grading system

Stage 0: Normal optic discRetinal NFL prominence at the nasal, superior, and inferior poles in an inverted proportion to disc diameter
Radial NFL striations - no tortuosity
Rarely obscuration of a major blood vessel, usually on the upper pole
Stage 1: Very early papilledema - minimal degree of edemaNo elevation of the disc borders
Obscuration of the nasal border of the disc
Normal temporal disc margin
Disruption of the normal radial NFL arrangement striations
Subtle and grayish halo (C-shaped) with temporal gap; underlying retinal details obscured
Concentric or radial choroidal folds
Stage 2: Early papilledema - low degree of edemaObscuration of all borders
Circumferential halo
Elevation of the nasal border
No obscuration of any major vessel
Stage 3: Moderate papilledema - moderate degree of edemaObscurations of all borders
Circumferential halo
Obscuration of one or more segments of major blood vessels leaving the disc
Elevation of all borders
Peripapillary halo-irregular outer fringe with finger-like extensions
Stage 4: Marked papilledema - marked degree of edemaTotal obscuration of a segment of a major blood vessel on the disc
Elevation of the entire nerve head, including the cup
Obscuration of all borders
Complete peripapillary halo
Stage 5: Severe papilledema - severe degree of edemaDome-shaped protrusions representing anterior expansion of the optic nerve head
Peripapillary halo is narrow and smoothly demarcated
Partial obscuration of all vessels and total obscuration of at least one major blood vessel on optic disc
Obliteration of the optic cup
Table 2 Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Diagnostic criteria for idiopathic intracranial hypertension1
IPapilledema
IINormal neurologic examination excepting abnormalities of the cranial nerves (VIth or VIIth nerve dysfunction)
IIINeuroimaging: Normal brain parenchyma without signs of hydrocephalus, mass, structural lesions, or abnormal meningeal enhancement on MRI (performed with and without gadolinium) for typical patients (female and obese), and on MRI (performed with and without gadolinium) along with MRV for other patients; if MRI is unavailable or contraindicated, a contrast-enhanced CT may serve as an alternative
IVNormal CSF composition
VIncrease LP opening pressure [≥ 250 mm CSF in adults and ≥ 280 mm CSF in children (250 mm CSF if the child is not sedated and not obese)] in an appropriately performed LP
Neuroimaging criteriaA: Empty sella
B: Posterior globe flattening
C: Optic nerve sheath distention (with or without optic nerve tortuosity)
D: Transverse venous sinus stenosis
Table 3 Magnetic resonance imaging signs for the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension
MRI finding
Sensitivity
Specificity
Ref.
Empty sella turcica53.9%94.3%[104]
26.7%94.6%[67]
70%95%[97]
Partially empty sella92%74%[68]
43%100%[69]
65.1%95.3%[70]
53.3%75%[67]
80%92%[76]
Posterior displacement of pituitary stalk39.5%90.7%[70]
42.7%97.9%[76]
Meningoceles11%100%[79]
Meckel’s cave enlargement60%59%[89]
75%86%[68]
9%100%[79]
Optic nerve tortuosity60%95%[69]
34.9%86%[70]
40%91.1%[67]
40%95%[97]
Optic nerve sheath distension77%85%[89]
84%84%[68]
46%100%[69]
66.7%82.1%[67]
45%95%[97]
Optic nerve head enhancement6.7%98.2%[67]
50%100%[97]
Posterior globe flattening55%100%[68]
64%100%[69]
43.3%100%[67]
80%95%[97]
Optic nerve head protrusion32%100%[69]
37.2%100%[70]
3.3%100%[67]
30%95%[97]
DWI bright spot at fundus9.5%99%[104]
26.3%100%[103] (reader 1)
42.1%100%[103] (reader 1)
Transverse sinus stenosis73%92%[68]
93%93%[107]
94%97%[104]
62.8%100%[70] (combined stenosis score)
Slit-like ventricles3%100%[69]
3.3%100%[67]
39.5%79.1%[70]
Tight subarachnoid spaces3%100%[69]
0%0%[67]
Inferior position of cerebellar tonsils16%195%1[78]
Table 4 A step-by-step checklist for the radiologist to enable the systematic assessment of suspected idiopathic intracranial hypertension cases
Step-by-step checklist

Step 1: Exclude the presence of an alternative and obvious cause of increased intracranial pressure. Note: This is a vital step required for IIH diagnosis, according to the revised criteria[1]Normal brain parenchyma without findings suggesting the presence of: (1) Hydrocephalus; (2) Masses or structural lesions; (3) Abnormal meningeal enhancement (caution should be exercised as diffuse dural enhancement may be encountered following a lumbar puncture); and (4) Venous sinus thrombosis
Step 2: Assess the presence of neuroimaging findings commonly encountered in IIH patients. Note: These findings demonstrate varying sensitivities and specificities. Various combinations of the related neuroimaging findings may be encountered, although their absence does not rule out the diagnosis. The radiologists should be aware of these signs to assist in the proper and timely diagnosis of the condition and/or to advocate for equivocal casesPrimary neuroimaging signs1. Note: These signs are very important to be assessed and mentioned in the report, as the presence of 3 out of 4 of them may suggest (but not verify) the probability of IIH diagnosis in specific clinical scenarios according to the revised IIH criteria[1]: (1) Empty sella turcica (Figure 3) (CSF-filled sella turcica, compressing the pituitary gland housed within it); (2) Posterior globe flattening (Figure 10) (loss of the normal posterior sclera curvature at the optic nerve insertion point); (3) Optic nerve sheath distension (Figure 8) (increased diameter of the optic nerve sheath with CSF filling of the subarachnoid space between the nerve and its expanded sheath; typically measured at 3 mm from the posterior globe margin; whether optic nerve tortuosity is synchronously present will not alter the evaluation of the presence of this sign as positive or negative); and (4) Transverse venous sinus stenosis (Figure 12) [most commonly occurs at the lateral aspect (transverse-sigmoid sinus junction) and may be caused by intrinsic or extrinsic processes. Assess using the combined venous conduit score or the index of transverse sinus stenosis]
Other neuroimaging signs. Note: Although not part of the revised criteria for the diagnosis of IIH[1], these are signs useful to assess and mention in the report as, nonetheless, they may be encountered in IIH cases: (1) Optic nerve tortuosity (Figure 7) (optic nerve tortuosity depicted in the horizontal, or preferably, the vertical planes); (2) Optic nerve head protrusion (Figure 10) (the imaging representation of papilledema; usually evaluated as hypointense relative to the vitreous fluid of the globe in T2-weighted images); (3) Optic nerve head enhancement (Figure 9) (contrast-enhanced optic nerve head within the posterior aspect of the globe); (4) Posterior displacement of the pituitary stalk (Figure 4) (besides pituitary gland compression, the pituitary stalk is posteriorly displaced); (5) Meningoceles (Figure 5) (meningeal protrusions through weak or defective points, usually in the skull base, usually in sphenoid bone wings); (6) Meckel’s cave enlargement (Figure 6) (CSF-filled enlargement of Meckel’s caves); (7) DWI bright spot at fundus (Figure 11) (abnormal hyperintensity at the optic nerve head encountered on DWI; recently reported as a marker of papilledema); (8) Slit-like ventricles (Figure 13) (narrowing/collapse of the lateral ventricle walls); (9) Tight subarachnoid spaces (Figure 13) (very small sulci and cisterns not typically expected in the normal adult population); and (10) Inferior position of cerebellar tonsils (Figure 14) (cerebellar tonsillar displacement through the foramen magnum into the upper portion of the spinal canal)
Step 3: Correlate with the clinical presentation and clinical findings. Note: Close communication and collaboration with referring physicians are important both for patient care and for the advancement of medical knowledge. Correlating the various findings encountered on imaging studies by the radiologist with the level of clinical suspicion and the other IIH diagnostic criteria, as communicated by the referring physicians, enables the radiologist to acknowledge which of them are usually most relevant and to what extent