Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Radiol. Jun 28, 2022; 14(6): 165-176
Published online Jun 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i6.165
Published online Jun 28, 2022. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v14.i6.165
Table 1 Comparison of demographic, clinical and preoperative radiological parameters between patients with and without clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula
Parameter | CR-POPF, n = 18 | No CR-POPF, n = 43 | P value |
Age in yr, mean ± SD | 53.7 ± 10.8 | 54.7 ± 11.5 | 0.746 |
Sex, n (%) | |||
Male | 10 (55.6) | 28 (65.1) | 0.567 |
Female | 8 (44.4) | 15 (34.9) | |
BMI in kg/m2, mean ± SD | 21.1 ± 4.4 | 20.1 ± 3.9 | 0.388 |
Weight loss, n (%) | 15 (83.3) | 32 (74.4) | 0.525 |
Comorbidities, n (%) | 11 (61.1) | 22 (51.2) | 0.578 |
Hemoglobin in gm%, mean ± SD | 10.7 ± 1.4 | 10.8 ± 1.5 | 0.735 |
Preoperative serum bilirubin (mg/dL), median (IQR) | 2 (1.8-6) | 3 (1-7) | 0.848 |
Preoperative biliary drainage, n (%) | 10 (55.6) | 22 (51.2) | 0.786 |
Pancreatic attenuation index, mean ± SD | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.741 |
Pancreatic enhancement ratio, mean ± SD | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | 0.006 |
Table 2 Correlation between preoperative radiological indices and histopathological pancreatic neck fat fraction and fibrosis
Table 3 Comparison of perioperative and pathological parameters between patients with and without clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula
Parameter | CR-POPF, n = 18 | No CR-POPF,n = 43 | P value |
Operative time in min, mean ± SD | 521.9 ± 123 | 463.9 ± 101.2 | 0.275 |
Blood loss in mL, median (IQR) | 550 (350-725) | 475 (350-800) | 0.830 |
Intraoperative blood transfusion, n (%) | 6 (33.3) | 17 (39.5) | 0.775 |
Pancreatic texture, n (%) | |||
Firm | 1 (5.6) | 20 (47.6) | 0.002 |
Soft | 17 (94.4) | 22 (52.4) | |
Pancreatic duct size in mm, mean ± SD | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 3.4 ± 1.6 | 0.169 |
Surgical approach, n (%) | |||
Open | 9 (50) | 24 (55.8) | |
Laparoscopic | 6 (33.3) | 12 (27.9) | |
Robot assisted | 3 (16.7) | 7 (16.3) | 0.927 |
Delayed gastric emptying, n (%) | 15 (83.3) | 13 (30.2) | < 0.001 |
Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage, n (%) | 3 (16.7) | 4 (9.3) | 0.662 |
Intra-abdominal abscess, n (%) | 9 (50) | 1 (2.3) | < 0.001 |
Hospital stay in d, mean ± SD | 26.8 ± 13.9 | 9.6 ±.6 | 0.001 |
Pathology, n (%) | |||
Malignant | 17 (94.4) | 35 (81.4) | |
Benign | 1 (5.6) | 8 (18.6) | 0.259 |
Fat fraction, n (%) | |||
Absent | 6 (33.3) | 20 (46.5) | |
Mild | 9 (50.0) | 17 (39.6) | 0.669 |
Moderate | 3 (16.7) | 6 (13.9) | |
Fibrosis score, n (%) | |||
Weak | 16 (88.9) | 27 (62.8) | |
Heavy | 2 (11.1) | 16 (37.2) | 0.063 |
- Citation: Gnanasekaran S, Durgesh S, Gurram R, Kalayarasan R, Pottakkat B, Rajeswari M, Srinivas BH, Ramesh A, Sahoo J. Do preoperative pancreatic computed tomography attenuation index and enhancement ratio predict pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy? World J Radiol 2022; 14(6): 165-176
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v14/i6/165.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v14.i6.165