Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.117814
Revised: January 12, 2026
Accepted: January 15, 2026
Published online: January 28, 2026
Processing time: 40 Days and 22.2 Hours
Owing to their swift, precise, and tireless capabilities, artificial intelligence (AI) applications in emergency radiology are becoming powerful tools for radiologists. These applications, which are useful for improving diagnostic efficiency, are also a core engine driving the entire field of emergency medicine toward higher levels of precision, personalization, and efficiency. The integration of AI into emergency radiology thus represents a transformative advancement in precision medicine. We explore herein the expanding applications of AI in emergency radiology, focusing on their potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, streamline workflows, and improve patient outcomes. By analyzing its current utilization and future directions, we demonstrate how AI is revolutionizing emergency care through intelligent image analysis and decision support systems. Although certain challenges remain, including data security, model interpretability, and clinical implementation standards, the immense potential of AI to reshape emergency workflows, promote precision medicine, and improve patient outcomes is unmistakable.
Core Tip: With emerging technologies such as quantum computing and federated learning poised to revolutionize diagnostic capabilities, the future of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology is promising. These innovations will enable the rapid processing of complex imaging data and support precision medicine tailored to individual patient needs. By overcoming current challenges and leveraging current and future advancements in artificial intelligence, emergency radiology will achieve new heights in precision medicine, ultimately enhancing patient care and operational efficiency.
- Citation: He ZX, Wang J, Yang JS. Expanding the applications of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: Advancing precision medicine and resource efficiency. World J Radiol 2026; 18(1): 117814
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i1/117814.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v18.i1.117814
Emergency radiology plays a key role in the diagnosis of life-threatening conditions such as strokes, traumatic injuries, and acute infections, to which the timely and accurate interpretation of medical images is paramount[1,2]. Owing to its capacity for rapid pattern recognition and data analysis, artificial intelligence (AI) offers unprecedented opportunities to augment human expertise in emergency settings. Recent developments in deep learning and computer vision have enabled AI applications to assist radiologists in detecting abnormalities with remarkable precision, accelerating the diagnostic process and reducing human error in medical imaging[3,4].
The timely and accurate interpretation of diagnostic imaging in the emergency setting determines both the success rate of rescue efforts and patient prognosis. However, traditional workflows are often constrained by radiologists’ physiological fatigue, differences in level of expertise, and speed in processing large volumes of data[5]. AI technology, leveraging its exceptional pattern recognition and data analysis capabilities, presents an unprecedented opportunity to supplement the cognitive and efficiency boundaries of humans in emergency medicine.
The rapid advancement of AI, particularly in the subfields of deep learning and computer vision, has become the driving force behind this transformation. By training on vase amounts of imaging data, these technologies simulate the neural networks of the human brain and are capable of identifying subtle lesions from complex images.
Precise detection of abnormalities: Current AI systems can perform pixel-level analysis, demonstrating sensitivity beyond the limits of the human eye in detecting difficult to discern hemorrhagic spots, early infarcts, and occult fractures[6]. In cases of ischemic stroke, AI not only rapidly identifies large vessel occlusions but also accurately calculates the ischemic penumbra, providing quantitative support for clinical decisions on thrombolysis or thrombectomy[7,8].
Three-dimensional intelligent reconstruction: When processing whole-body computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with multiple traumas, AI can perform multimodal three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and segmentation of bones, blood vessels, and organs, generating injury severity scores with a single click[9]. These capabilities reduce the diagnostic time from several minutes to mere seconds, significantly improving the efficiency of treating patients with severe trauma.
The value of AI in medical imaging extends far beyond simple lesion annotation; it is profoundly reshaping the workflow of emergency radiology and delivering accurate results at critical junctures.
Maximizing efficiency in diagnostic processes: The around-the-clock analytical capability of AI enables preliminary screening upon image transmission by performing a real-time parallel analysis on images from scanners, completing an initial screening and prioritizing critical cases before radiologists begin their formal review, thereby minimizing the diagnostic period to the greatest extent.
Workload reduction: By leveraging AI for high-volume image pre-screening, the majority of examinations without significant abnormalities are automatically filtered out, allowing radiologists to concentrate on flagged complex or critical cases, thereby effectively reducing their overall workload and preventing fatigue-induced misdiagnoses or oversights.
Transition from experience-dependent to data-driven: AI algorithms standardize and replicate the diagnostic expertise of radiologists, enhancing the development of newer physicians by reducing individual discrepancies. Furthermore, quantitative analyses provide decision-making support surpassing traditional morphological observations - such as tumor malignancy prediction and automated hemorrhage quantification - enhancing precision medicine.
AI-powered image analysis tools have shown exceptional proficiency in detecting subtle anomalies in medical imaging. In stroke assessments, AI algorithms can analyze CT scans to identify ischemic regions with high sensitivity, decreasing the time needed to make treatment decisions[10]. Similarly, in trauma cases, AI can pinpoint fractures and internal injuries, even in complex anatomical areas where visual assessments are less accurate[11]. These advancements not only enhance diagnostic confidence, but also significantly reduce the time from imaging to diagnosis, which is crucial in emergency medicine.
As the basis for decision-making in acute and critical care, the response speed and diagnostic accuracy of emergency radiology directly determine treatment success rates. With the ongoing advancements in deep learning and computer vision technologies, AI-driven image analysis has evolved from an auxiliary supplement to a core tool. Leveraging computational power that surpasses human perception, it systematically addresses three critical weaknesses in diagnostic imaging - delays, fatigue, and cognitive biases - propelling emergency care models toward a transformation from experience-based to data-driven.
Microscopic lesion detection: Current AI algorithms, trained on tens of millions of annotated images, can perform sub-pixel-level analyses to identify subtle changes in tissue density, texture, and morphology[12]. Research on the assessment of strokes shows that AI systems have a very high sensitivity for the detection of early cerebral infarction, offering a significant improvement over experienced physicians[13].
Multimodal data fusion analysis: The new generation of AI platforms transcends single imaging modalities, enabling the rapid collaborative interpretation of data from multiple modalities at once, including CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and digital radiography[14]. Looking at the chest pain triad, AI can simultaneously analyze and integrate the imaging features of the pulmonary artery, aorta, and coronary arteries with electrocardiogram and troponin data to obtain a differential diagnosis within 8 minutes - three times faster than traditional workflows[15].
3D intelligent reconstruction and injury quantification: For patients with multiple traumas, AI can automatically perform organ segmentation and 3D modeling of whole-body CT scans, generating real-time organ injury scores[16]. In complex anatomical regions like the spine and pelvis, in particular, fracture detection rates have increased to 94.2%, nearly eradicating missed diagnoses.
Parallel innovation in diagnostic processes: In preemptive intelligent triage, a preliminary analysis is completed during the transmission of imaging data, meaning physicians have this information in hand by the time the patient returns from imaging. In automatic critical value reporting, when conditions such as active bleeding or aortic dissection are detected, the system directly pushes alerts to the mobile terminals of the treatment team.
Structured report generation: AI programs automatically populate lesion localization, measurement, and grading information, requiring physicians only to review and confirm the findings.
Infrastructure layer development: Edge computing devices can be deployed in CT/MRI control rooms to ensure nearly instantaneous response times, establish a federated learning platform to enable multi-center data collaboration and model optimization, and build a block chain auditing system to ensure data security and operation traceability - the core steps in such an invaluable framework.
Workflow integration strategy: AI interfaces can be embedded in radiology information system and picture archive and communication system (PACS) software to achieve seamless integration, establish collaborative human-machine diagnosis protocols, clarify clinical adoption criteria for AI prompts, and implement a continuous learning mechanism to update models at specified intervals based on feedback.
Quality control system: Although AI has some advantages in decision making, it is difficult to completely replace human intelligence and experience; thus, quality control is needed to guarantee the following principles: Human override authority, allowing physicians to overturn AI decisions within 30 seconds; dynamic accuracy monitoring, automatically downgrading models when performance fluctuations exceed thresholds; and multi-dimensional evaluation metrics, including time efficiency gains, diagnostic consistency, and clinical outcome improvements.
Cross-modal generalized learning: Next-generation AI will surpass the limitations of single-disease detection, allowing for comprehensive disease spectrum screening and the identification of rare pathologies via self-supervised learning.
Preventive health interventions: By integrating genomics and radiomics features, AI will establish disease risk prediction models to identify potential high-risk individuals in the emergency setting, enabling earlier in diagnosis and treatment.
Autonomous diagnosis-treatment collaboration: In fifth generation cellular technology enabled environments, AI will coordinate multiple devices to complete automated workflows, such as intelligently adding scan sequences based on preliminary findings while guiding robotic instruments in biopsy positioning.
At present, the application of AI in emergency radiology has moved beyond the proof-of-concept stage and is steadily advancing toward routine clinical use. By deeply integrating cutting-edge algorithms with various medical scenarios, we can use AI to not only build faster and more accurate diagnostic systems but also develop patient-centered emergency departments. The establishment of standardized technical guidelines, ethics frameworks, and training systems is the ultimate safeguard for realizing the value of this transformation.
The integration of AI into emergency radiology workflows has led to substantial improvements in efficiency. Intelligent scheduling systems minimize patient waiting times by optimizing resource allocation, while automated report generation tools streamline the documentation and dissemination of results. Furthermore, AI-driven platforms can prioritize critical cases based on severity, ensuring that life-threatening conditions receive immediate attention[17]. Workflow optimization reduces operational bottlenecks and allows healthcare providers to focus on patient care rather than administrative tasks.
As a key component in the diagnosis and treatment of acute and critical illnesses, radiology departments face a sharp contradiction between imaging demands, limited intelligence resources, and diagnostic urgency. In traditional emergency workflows, numerous steps - imaging examinations, report generation, and clinical decision-making - are dependent on human labor and empirical judgment, creating significant bottlenecks in efficiency and potential risks. The goal of AI in emergency radiology extends beyond individual steps, aiming instead for systemic performance leaps through end-to-end process optimization.
Intelligent triage: The primary step in the optimization of the AI emergency radiology workflow involves establishing a severity-based priority engine, which begins with accurate triage. By accessing the hospital’s health information system, the AI triage engine can analyze multi-dimensional data from emergency triage stations, ambulance vital sign monitoring devices, and laboratories in real-time.
Dynamic priority assessment: The AI system utilizes natural language processing technology to instantly extract key complaint terms (chest pain, coma) and combine them with abnormal vital sign patterns (sudden drop in blood pressure, persistently low blood oxygen saturation) to dynamically score case severity. For example, patients exhibiting suspected stroke or severe traumatic hemorrhage characteristics will have their CT scan requests automatically flagged as the highest priority and moved the front of the queue[18].
Predictive resource matching: The AI system only determines not only who goes first, but also predicts what equipment and human personnel are needed. For patients with combined injuries, the system can automatically recommend spectral CT to reduce metal artifacts, and for patients with suspected aortic dissection, the system proactively coordinates the contrast agent injection and assigns technologists with experience in cardiovascular radiology. This pre-emptive customization minimizes redundant examinations and delays caused by mismatched equipment or human personnel from the outset.
Traditional scheduling models struggle to cope with the inherent fluctuations of emergency demands. AI-driven scheduling systems, however, achieve flexible resource management and precise allocation through continuous learning and prediction. Predictive load balancing: AI algorithms analyze historical data, seasonal disease pattern variations, and even weather forecasts to accurately predict peak examination volumes for a pre-specified timeframe. The system can proactively activate contingency plans based on these predictions - for instance, automatically recommending the addition of mobile CT units or initiating cross-campus remote diagnostic support when anticipating a surge in trauma cases during off-shifts.
Automated report generation: AI systems based on computer vision can automatically extract key findings (hemorrhage volume, infarct region, fracture type) from the image analysis and populate them into premade templates. The radio
Intelligent critical value alerts and information sharing: When the AI system identifies suspected critical conditions (massive intracranial hemorrhage, pulmonary artery trunk embolism), the system not only marks them in red in PACS but also pushes key images and preliminary diagnostic information directly to the mobile terminals of emergency physicians or specialist teams via the hospital’s internal communication system. This achieves seamless imaging-clinical integration, decreasing the time from diagnosis to intervention.
Despite its promise, the comprehensive implementation of AI workflow optimization faces multiple challenges, requiring a balance between clinical practice and AI developments.
Complexity of system integration: Embedding AI scheduling engines into existing Hospital Information System, radiology information system, and PACS systems necessitates resolving numerous interface and data standardization issues.
New models of human-machine collaboration: Clear boundaries must be established for the responsibilities and authority of AI and physicians. A reliable solution is to implement a 30 seconds veto period, whereby all AI-generated prompts must undergo rapid physician confirmation before execution. This confirmation ensures patient safety and fosters clinical trust with the system.
Value measurement dimensions: Evaluating the effectiveness of AI workflow optimization should not focus solely on improvements in examination speed (reduced average wait times) but must also prioritize clinical endpoint metrics, including shorter door-to-needle times, improved patient prognosis rates, and enhanced job satisfaction among medical staff.
The optimization of emergency radiology workflows by AI highlights the broader focus on diagnostic precision and advanced knowledge in medical services. By transforming data into insights and insights into actions, AI creates a new operational system characterized by faster responses, more efficient resource utilization, and more reliable medical decision-making. With ongoing advancements in federated learning, edge computing, and other technologies, AI will enable the coordinated scheduling of regional emergency resources. Technological advancements will always serve humans - empowering radiologists to focus on diagnostic decisions while ensuring that every critically ill patient receives accurate and expedient diagnosis and treatment.
AI-based decision support systems provide real-time insights to emergency radiologists suggesting differential diagnoses based on the analysis of vast datasets. These systems leverage machine learning models trained on extensive clinical histories and imaging results to offer evidence-based recommendations. By integrating AI suggestions into clinical decision-making, healthcare professionals gain comprehensive diagnostic support in formulating accurate treatment plans and improving patient outcomes.
Emergency radiologists have long faced dual challenges: The need to accurately identify life-threatening findings while simultaneously overcoming the diagnostic risks of cognitive bias and time constraints. Traditional decision-making models relied heavily on human experience and memory. The emergence of AI decision support systems advances this field from experience- to evidence-based practices, evolving from an auxiliary tool to a clinical partner capable of integrating multimodal information, delivering real-time insights, and continuously improving. The efficacy of AI decision support systems in emergency radiology is rooted in their sophisticated architecture, manifested through three critical layers.
Multi-source data fusion layer: Imaging data - the system utilizes deep learning convolutional neural networks to perform pixel-level analyses of CT, MRI, and X-ray images, identifying findings ranging from overt hemorrhage to subtle ground-glass opacities[10]. Clinical context - the system utilizes natural language processing to extract patient complaints, medical histories, laboratory results, and vital signs from electronic health records, enabling the AI system to contextualize imaging findings. For instance, the system can interpret chest pain with unstable blood pressure in the emergency room setting as more indicative of an aortic dissection than myocardial infarction.
Intelligent algorithm reasoning layer: Differential diagnosis engine - rather than providing a singular diagnosis, the system generates a weighted list of differential diagnoses based on probabilistic models. As an example, for intracranial hemorrhage, the system might include differential diagnoses such as hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, or neoplastic hemorrhage, each of which is annotated with probability weights and key discriminative features. Evidence linking and traceability - advanced systems leverage explainable AI techniques such as class activation mapping to highlight image findings supporting diagnoses (occluded vessels, fracture lines) and link them to relevant medical literature or guidelines, ensuring transparency and auditability.
Seamless clinical integration layer: Decision support is directly embedded into radiologists’ routine workflows. As images are reviewed, AI-generated preliminary analyses, differential diagnoses, and supporting evidence are displayed in real-time via sidebars or floating windows, providing readily visible decision-making assistance, rather than adding an additional workflow step.
The AI system creates multidimensional core value in the emergency setting.
Qualitative improvement in diagnostic accuracy: By comparing tens of millions of previous cases, AI can identify subtle patterns imperceptible to the human eye. For instance, in early-stage ischemic stroke, AI demonstrates significantly higher sensitivity than newer radiologists in detecting early CT signs such as the hyperdense middle cerebral artery and insular ribbon signs[10].
Improved decision-making efficiency: The system can analyze hundreds of imaging slices within seconds and provide radiologists with an AI-based structured diagnostic framework, compressing what is typically a minutes-long differential diagnostic process. This improved efficacy is particularly invaluable during high-volume off-shifts or holidays.
Advancements in integrated diagnosis and treatment: In addition to diagnostic recommendations, AI systems now provide prognostic predictions. For example, based on initial head CT scans, AI can predict long-term neurological outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury or assess the risk of severe progression in pneumonia by analyzing imaging findings, offering prospective evidence for personalized treatment planning[19].
Evolution from supplemental diagnoses to proactive health management: In the future, emergency radiology AI decision support systems will evolve toward deeper integration and broader connectivity.
Generative AI and diagnostic reasoning: Future systems will incorporate large language models capable of simulating expert reasoning to generate clinical diagnostic narratives, serving as template reports for radiologists. Despite these promising prospects, the comprehensive deployment of such systems still faces challenges that require systematic resolutions (Table 1).
| Challenge dimensions | Core issues | Strategic response plan |
| Data privacy and security | Patient imaging and medical record data are highly sensitive | By adopting federated learning technology, we achieve collaborative training with the principle of ‘data stays local while models move’; hospital-based servers are utilized to ensure data remains within the hospital |
| Model interpretability and clinical trust | “Black box” decision-making is difficult for physicians to accept | The system needs to provide visual evidence (e.g., heat map) and a confidence score to establish a human-machine collaborative golden veto mechanism |
| Workflow integration and ethical responsibilities | The responsibility for adverse consequences caused by algorithmic errors is ambiguously defined | The legal framework must clearly define the role of AI as an auxiliary tool, with all diagnostic reports ultimately requiring review and signature by licensed physicians; all AI decision pathways must be blockchain-verified for traceability and auditing purposes |
AI hub for regional emergency resources: The AI system will function as the brain of regional emergency networks, monitoring real-time imaging workloads and critical case statuses across all medical institutions in a given region, intelligently recommending patient triage solutions and maximizing healthcare resource utilization.
The utilization of AI in emergency radiology raises concerns about data privacy and security. Compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act is essential to protect patient information. AI systems must incorporate robust encryption and access controls to prevent unauthorized data breaches and promote trust in healthcare technologies.
AI models are susceptible to biases based on limited training datasets, which can lead to disparities in diagnostic accuracy across diverse patient populations. Continuous monitoring and validation of AI systems using inclusive datasets are key to addressing these potential biases. Additionally, enhancing the transparency of AI algorithms through explainable techniques is crucial for earning clinician trust and ensuring accountability in decision-making processes.
The ability to seamlessly integrate AI tools into existing healthcare infrastructure poses a significant challenge owing to potential interoperability issues that can hinder their widespread utilization. Future efforts should focus on developing standardized protocols and fostering collaboration between technology providers and healthcare institutions to facilitate smooth implementation.
Despite the advantages of AI in decision making, the rigidity of the machine prohibits the complete replacement of human intellect. While AI undergoes continuous evolution to reach the boundary of human intelligence, humans should maintain a deeper understanding of the information AI provides.
The applications of AI in emergency radiology will surpass isolated diagnostic tools, garnering deeper integration and broader connectivity.
Future AI systems will break down information silos, seamlessly integrating imaging data, electronic medical records, genomics, and laboratory test results to establish a panoramic view of the patient.
The AI system can predict disease progression, risks of complications, and long-term prognoses based on initial imaging findings, shifting the focus of care from treating existing diseases to preventing future illnesses.
The expanding utilization of AI in emergency radiology is a key step in advancing precision medicine. By enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing workflows, and providing robust decision support, AI technologies are transforming the delivery of emergency care. The ability to accurately provide near-immediate diagnoses will improve clinical decision making and patient outcomes, while ensuring the most efficient utilization of resources. A deeper and synchronous cross-understanding between human and AI may be a key direction for development.
| 1. | Aydin S, Ece B, Cakmak V, Kocak B, Onur MR. Emergency radiology: roadmap for radiology departments. Jpn J Radiol. 2025;43:1606-1617. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Centini FR, Fedorov D, Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS. Radiologists' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence in emergency radiology: A pilot survey. World J Radiol. 2025;17:115388. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Xu Y, Khan TM, Song Y, Meijering E. Edge deep learning in computer vision and medical diagnostics: a comprehensive survey. Artif Intell Rev. 2025;58:93. [DOI] [Full Text] |
| 4. | Obuchowicz R, Lasek J, Wodziński M, Piórkowski A, Strzelecki M, Nurzynska K. Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Radiology-Current Status and Critical Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025;15:282. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Gu Z, Dogra S, Siriruchatanon M, Kneifati-Hayek J, Kang SK. Radiology Workflow Assistance With Artificial Intelligence: Establishing the Link to Outcomes. J Am Coll Radiol. 2025;S1546-1440(25)00598. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Das V, Bower AJ, Aguilera N, Li J, Tam J. Artificial intelligence-assisted retinal imaging enables dense pixel sampling from sparse measurements. NPJ Artif Intell. 2025;1:48. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Heo J. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Scoping Review. Neurointervention. 2024;20:4-14. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Darkhabani Z, Ezzeldin R, Delora A, Kass-Hout O, Alderazi Y, Nguyen TN, El-Ghanem M, Anwoju T, Ali Z, Ezzeldin M. Current utilization and impact of AI LVO detection tools in acute stroke triage: a multicenter survey analysis. Neurol Res. 2025;47:1129-1138. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Galan D, Caban KM, Singerman L, Braga TA, Paes FM, Katz DS, Munera F. Trauma and 'Whole' Body Computed Tomography: Role, Protocols, Appropriateness, and Evidence to Support its Use and When. Radiol Clin North Am. 2024;62:1063-1076. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Jiang B, Pham N, van Staalduinen EK, Liu Y, Nazari-Farsani S, Sanaat A, van Voorst H, Fettahoglu A, Kim D, Ouyang J, Kumar A, Srivatsan A, Hussein R, Lansberg MG, Boada F, Zaharchuk G. Deep Learning Applications in Imaging of Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Narrative Summary. Radiology. 2025;315:e240775. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Baghbani S, Mehrabi Y, Movahedinia M, Babaeinejad E, Joshaghanian M, Amiri S, Shahrezaee M. The revolutionary impact of artificial intelligence in orthopedics: comprehensive review of current benefits and challenges. J Robot Surg. 2025;19:511. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in RCA: 7] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Liu Y, Yuan D, Xu Z, Zhan Y, Zhang H, Lu J, Lukasiewicz T. Pixel level deep reinforcement learning for accurate and robust medical image segmentation. Sci Rep. 2025;15:8213. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Kuwabara M, Ikawa F, Sakamoto S, Okazaki T, Ishii D, Hosogai M, Maeda Y, Chiku M, Kitamura N, Choppin A, Takamiya D, Shimahara Y, Nakayama T, Kurisu K, Horie N. Effectiveness of tuning an artificial intelligence algorithm for cerebral aneurysm diagnosis: a study of 10,000 consecutive cases. Sci Rep. 2023;13:16202. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Rao VM, Hla M, Moor M, Adithan S, Kwak S, Topol EJ, Rajpurkar P. Multimodal generative AI for medical image interpretation. Nature. 2025;639:888-896. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 23] [Article Influence: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | Tang J, Chen F, Wu D. Early auxiliary diagnosis model for chest pain triad based on artificial intelligence multimodal fusion. JAMIA Open. 2025;8:ooaf114. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Wasserthal J, Breit HC, Meyer MT, Pradella M, Hinck D, Sauter AW, Heye T, Boll DT, Cyriac J, Yang S, Bach M, Segeroth M. TotalSegmentator: Robust Segmentation of 104 Anatomic Structures in CT Images. Radiol Artif Intell. 2023;5:e230024. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in RCA: 565] [Article Influence: 188.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 17. | Da'Costa A, Teke J, Origbo JE, Osonuga A, Egbon E, Olawade DB. AI-driven triage in emergency departments: A review of benefits, challenges, and future directions. Int J Med Inform. 2025;197:105838. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 19] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 18. | Gillespie CS, Hanrahan JG, Mahdiyar R, Lee KS, Ashraf M, Alam AM, Ekert JO, Mantle O, Williams SC, Funnell JP, Gurusinghe N, Vindlacheruvu R, Whitfield PC, Trivedi RA, Helmy A, Hutchinson PJ. Diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: Systematic evaluation of CT head diagnostic accuracy and comparison with the 2022 NICE guidelines. Brain Spine. 2025;5:104200. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 19. | Pease M, Arefan D, Barber J, Yuh E, Puccio A, Hochberger K, Nwachuku E, Roy S, Casillo S, Temkin N, Okonkwo DO, Wu S; TRACK-TBI Investigators. Outcome Prediction in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Deep Learning from Head CT Scans. Radiology. 2022;304:385-394. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in RCA: 65] [Article Influence: 16.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
