Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.110048
Revised: June 9, 2025
Accepted: July 10, 2025
Published online: July 28, 2025
Processing time: 58 Days and 7.2 Hours
This editorial critically evaluated Liu et al's recent retrospective analysis of 283 Chinese patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that validated a preoperative computed tomography-based risk scoring system origi
Core Tip: This editorial critically evaluated the retrospective study by Liu et al in validating a preoperative computed tomography-based risk scoring system, while high-lighting the potential of radiomics integrated with machine learning for multimodal data analysis. However, clinical translation continues to face significant challenges, including heterogeneity in imaging parameters, incomplete elucidation of molecular mechanisms, and confounding effects of therapeutic interventions. Future research should prioritize the development of multidimensional predictive frameworks that synergize radiological, molecular, and clinical data. Prospective clinical trials to validate model efficacy and artificial intelligence-driven real-time risk stratification systems represent critical initiatives to overcome current limitations in precision medicine implementation, thereby advancing personalized management strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
- Citation: Liu QZ, Zeng L, Sun NZ. Radiomics for preoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk stratification: Cross-population validation, multidimensional integration, challenges, and future directions. World J Radiol 2025; 17(7): 110048
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v17/i7/110048.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.110048
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a major therapeutic challenge in global oncology due to its aggressive biological behavior and high postoperative recurrence rates. Although radical resection remains the only potentially curative intervention, the 5-year survival rate persists below 10%, with a postoperative recurrence risk reaching as high as 70% within 3 years[1,2]. Emerging as a key challenge in overcoming current prognostic limitations is the identification of high-risk recurrence populations through precision preoperative evaluation to guide therapeutic optimization. Recent advances integrating radiomics, machine learning, and multimodal clinical data have revolutionized PDAC preoperative risk stratification, with particularly notable progress in cross-population validation and multimodal integration studies of computed tomography (CT)-based risk scoring systems[3-5].
Conventional imaging assessment demonstrates inherent limitations in quantifying tumor heterogeneity, as it primarily relies on radiologists' subjective evaluation of morphological characteristics, tissue density patterns, and invasion boundaries[6,7]. The preoperative CT-based risk stratification system developed by South Korean researchers—incorporating five imaging parameters (tumor size, portal venous phase density, tumor necrosis, peripancreatic infiltration, and suspected metastatic lymph nodes)—has demonstrated validated predictive value in indigenous populations[2], though its clinical generalizability across ethnic cohorts requires critical validation. A Chinese cohort study of 283 resectable PDAC patients has provided inaugural evidence demonstrating the model's robust risk stratification capability in Chinese populations (Table 1)[8]. Interobserver agreement analysis between two radiologists revealed a Kappa value of 0.78, confirming its clinical applicability[9]. These findings align with the Dutch nationwide study outcomes where asymptomatic recurrence patients demonstrated significantly higher treatment rates and improved survival prognosis, suggesting the potential generalizability of radiomics-based models across heterogeneous healthcare environments[10].
Risk groups (risk score) | Recurrence rates (reader 1) | Recurrence rates (reader 2) | Median recurrence-free survival |
Low risk (< 2 points) | 39.0% | 50.0% | Significantly longer |
Intermediate risk (2-4 points) | 82.1% | 79.5% | Shorter |
High risk (≥ 5 points) | 84.5% | 88.9% | The shortest |
Notably, this model's evaluation metrics are exclusively derived from routine dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT scans, requiring neither specialized techniques nor invasive procedures, thereby exhibiting favorable clinical applicability[9]. The composite feature of portal venous phase tumor hypodensity (suggestive of aberrant angiogenesis) combined with tumor necrosis (reflecting metabolic activity) carries a risk weight of 2-4 points, demonstrating strong positive correlation with postoperative recurrence risk. This integration of multidimensional biomarkers enables more comprehensive characterization of tumor biological behavior compared to conventional solitary pathological parameters such as lymph node metastasis.
This study[9] demonstrates significant progress in validating the cross-population efficacy of CT-based risk stratification models, while several limitations necessitate further investigation. First, the majority of enrolled patients did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a therapeutic intervention proven to enhance tumor resectability and reduce postoperative recurrence risk, potentially constraining the model's applicability in modern multimodal treatment regimens. Second, the proportion of low-risk tumors (≤ 2 centimeters) in the Chinese cohort (23.3%) was lower than that reported in the original Korean study, potentially compromising the model's robustness in predictive performance. Smaller tumors typically demonstrate less aggressive biological behavior with greater heterogeneity, and their underrepresentation may introduce bias in early-stage disease risk stratification. Furthermore, insufficient incorporation of population-specific epidemiological characteristics—particularly genetic variations and comorbidity distributions prevalent in Chinese cohorts—necessitates future model calibration using indigenous biomarker data. Finally, the 24-month median follow-up duration precludes comprehensive evaluation of 5-year survival rates and late-phase recurrence patterns, thereby limiting prognostic precision for long-term clinical outcomes.
The evolution of precision medicine has revealed inherent limitations in unidimensional imaging-based models, positioning the integration of multidimensional data as a critical determinant for optimizing predictive accuracy. In radiomics research, an investigation incorporating 1409 CT textural features demonstrated model efficacy using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, achieving training and validation area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.93 and 0.63, respectively. This framework successfully quantified tumor-stroma ratio (TSR), with TSR values demonstrating strong correlations with tumor microenvironment fibrotic status and immune evasion mechanisms in subsequent validation cohorts[5,11,12]. Elevated preoperative serum levels of cancer antigen 19-9 and C-reactive protein, along with decreased skeletal muscle index (indicative of sarcopenia), have been identified as significant predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. These findings suggest that systemic inflammatory status and metabolic dysregulation may adversely affect prognosis through their potential role in facilitating the development of micrometastases[13-15].
Significantly, machine learning exhibits distinct strengths in integrating multi-modal data. Research demonstrates that predictive models leveraging venous-phase radiomic characteristics attain 0.801 accuracy in validation cohorts, with inclusion of supplementary clinical parameters (including tumor marker concentrations and lesion morphology) augmenting the model's AUC to 0.904[16]. Multi-omics data synthesis has further proven capable of delineating cross-modality biological interactions, effectively addressing fundamental constraints of single-modality approaches[17]. These observations imply that coordinated incorporation of radiomic profiles with novel liquid biopsy markers—specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutational load and longitudinal ctDNA surveillance—may refine clinical prediction models, thereby advancing evidence-based decision architectures in precision oncology.
Despite substantial advancements in current research, clinical translation continues to confront significant obstacles. Primarily, in multicenter studies, heterogeneity in CT acquisition parameters (including reconstruction kernel, slice thickness, and tube voltage) significantly impacts model generalizability. Variations in reconstruction kernels de
Future research should focus on three key directions. First, multidimensional predictive networks should be established through the development of integrated imaging-molecular-clinical models incorporating genomic alterations, metabolic biomarkers, and gut microbiome profiles. Second, systematic validation through prospective clinical trials should assess the clinical utility of these models in guiding neoadjuvant therapeutic decision-making. Finally, imple
The study conducted by Liu et al[8] validated the cross-population application of radiomics models, marking a significant step toward standardization in preoperative prediction of PDAC. Three key priorities for further research include: (1) Developing multidimensional predictive models that synthesize imaging, molecular, and clinical data through incorporation of genomic profiles, metabolic features, and gut microbiota characteristics; (2) Validating the clinical efficacy of these models in guiding neoadjuvant treatment strategies via prospective trials; and (3) Establishing EHR-integrated AI systems to enable dynamic risk stratification and implement predictive-therapeutic-monitoring closed-loop management frameworks. Interdisciplinary collaboration and standardized imaging protocols constitute the foundational requirements for mitigating multicenter data heterogeneity and advancing clinical translation, ultimately supporting personalized therapeutic approaches for PDAC patients.
1. | Lee JS, Han Y, Yun WG, Kwon W, Kim H, Jeong H, Seo MS, Park Y, Cho SI, Kim H, Kim JY, Seong MW, Jang JY, Park SS. Parallel Analysis of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Tumor Tissues in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Chem. 2022;68:1509-1518. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Kim DW, Lee SS, Kim SO, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Byun JH, Yoo C, Kim KP, Song KB, Kim SC. Estimating Recurrence after Upfront Surgery in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Using Pancreatic CT: Development and Validation of a Risk Score. Radiology. 2020;296:541-551. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in RCA: 36] [Article Influence: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Khalvati F, Zhang Y, Baig S, Lobo-Mueller EM, Karanicolas P, Gallinger S, Haider MA. Prognostic Value of CT Radiomic Features in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5449. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in RCA: 63] [Article Influence: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Tian N, Wu D, Zhu L, Zeng M, Li J, Wang X. A predictive model for recurrence after upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by using preoperative clinical data and CT characteristics. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22:116. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Meng Y, Zhang H, Li Q, Liu F, Fang X, Li J, Yu J, Feng X, Zhu M, Li N, Jing G, Wang L, Ma C, Lu J, Bian Y, Shao C. CT Radiomics and Machine-Learning Models for Predicting Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:707288. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 15] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Yang Q, Mao Y, Xie H, Qin T, Mai Z, Cai Q, Wen H, Li Y, Zhang R, Liu L. Identifying Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and RECIST Stable Disease Using Radiomics Analysis. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2100362. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Dalal V, Carmicheal J, Dhaliwal A, Jain M, Kaur S, Batra SK. Radiomics in stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions: Machine learning in action. Cancer Lett. 2020;469:228-237. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in RCA: 67] [Article Influence: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Liu XH, Xie JH, Zhu XS, Liu LH. Preoperative computed tomography-based risk stratification model validation for postoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025;17:107804. [RCA] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Xie RX, Xing YX, Sun NZ. Advancing minimally invasive surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients: Bridging evidence to practice. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025;17:108152. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
10. | Daamen LA, Groot VP, Besselink MG, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Los M, Meijer GJ, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Pranger BK, Raicu MG, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Detection, Treatment, and Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022;275:769-775. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in RCA: 42] [Article Influence: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Collao N, Sanders O, Caminiti T, Messeiller L, De Lisio M. Resistance and endurance exercise training improves muscle mass and the inflammatory/fibrotic transcriptome in a rhabdomyosarcoma model. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14:781-793. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Velarde F, Ezquerra S, Delbruyere X, Caicedo A, Hidalgo Y, Khoury M. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated transfer of mitochondria: mechanisms and functional impact. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79:177. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in RCA: 52] [Article Influence: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Kim NH, Kim HJ. Preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative intent surgical resection. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018;17:450-455. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in RCA: 16] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Sugimoto M, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ, Smoot RL, Chari ST, Moynagh MR, Petersen GM, Carter RE, Takahashi N. Decreased Skeletal Muscle Volume Is a Predictive Factor for Poorer Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:831-839. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in RCA: 49] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Matsumoto I, Murakami Y, Shinzeki M, Asari S, Goto T, Tani M, Motoi F, Uemura K, Sho M, Satoi S, Honda G, Yamaue H, Unno M, Akahori T, Kwon AH, Kurata M, Ajiki T, Fukumoto T, Ku Y. Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: A multi-center retrospective study. Pancreatology. 2015;15:674-680. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in RCA: 106] [Article Influence: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Lou F, Li M, Chu T, Duan H, Liu H, Zhang J, Duan K, Liu H, Wei F. Comprehensive analysis of clinical data and radiomic features from contrast enhanced CT for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Sci Rep. 2024;14:17218. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Reza MS, Qiu C, Lin X, Su KJ, Liu A, Zhang X, Gong Y, Luo Z, Tian Q, Nwadiugwu M, Liang S, Shen H, Deng HW. An Attention-Aware Multi-Task Learning Framework Identifies Candidate Targets for Drug Repurposing in Sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16:e13661. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Peng X, Yang S, Zhou L, Mei Y, Shi L, Zhang R, Shan F, Liu L. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Computed Tomography Radiomics for Pulmonary Nodules: A Multicenter Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2022;57:242-253. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in RCA: 17] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vázquez J, Castro-García M, Villas MV, Mansilla Legorburo F, Sabater S. Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters. Radiology. 2018;288:407-415. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 295] [Cited by in RCA: 429] [Article Influence: 61.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Peerlings J, Woodruff HC, Winfield JM, Ibrahim A, Van Beers BE, Heerschap A, Jackson A, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, DeSouza NM, Lambin P. Stability of radiomics features in apparent diffusion coefficient maps from a multi-centre test-retest trial. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4800. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 97] [Cited by in RCA: 99] [Article Influence: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Barreto I, Lamoureux R, Olguin C, Quails N, Correa N, Rill L, Arreola M. Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:141-151. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, Cameron JL, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, He J. Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;267:936-945. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 244] [Cited by in RCA: 486] [Article Influence: 69.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Preuss K, Thach N, Liang X, Baine M, Chen J, Zhang C, Du H, Yu H, Lin C, Hollingsworth MA, Zheng D. Using Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Radiomics and Deep Learning Applications. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:1654. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in RCA: 37] [Article Influence: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Khasawneh H, Ferreira Dalla Pria HR, Miranda J, Nevin R, Chhabra S, Hamdan D, Chakraborty J, Biachi de Castria T, Horvat N. CT Imaging Assessment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Resectability after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Status and Perspective on the Use of Radiomics. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6821. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |