Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Jul 28, 2025; 17(7): 110048
Published online Jul 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i7.110048
Radiomics for preoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma risk stratification: Cross-population validation, multidimensional integration, challenges, and future directions
Qin-Zhi Liu, Lei Zeng, Nian-Zhe Sun, National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan Province, China
ORCID number: Qin-Zhi Liu (0009-0001-6307-6200); Lei Zeng (0009-0003-7935-2817); Nian-Zhe Sun (0000-0001-7660-110X).
Co-corresponding authors: Lei Zeng and Nian-Zhe Sun.
Author contributions: Liu QZ wrote the first draft and developed the main ideas; Zeng L directed the analytical framework, coordinated interdisciplinary collaborations, and supervised the interpretation of results alongside manuscript finalization; Sun NZ spearheaded the conception and design of the study, provided critical revision of the manuscript, and led revisions; Zeng L and Sun NZ have played important and indispensable roles in the manuscript preparation as the co-corresponding authors; all of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Nian-Zhe Sun, MD, National Clinical Research Center of Geriatric Disorders, Department of Orthopedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Kaifu District, Changsha 410008, Hunan Province, China. sunnzh201921@sina.com
Received: May 28, 2025
Revised: June 9, 2025
Accepted: July 10, 2025
Published online: July 28, 2025
Processing time: 58 Days and 7.2 Hours

Abstract

This editorial critically evaluated Liu et al's recent retrospective analysis of 283 Chinese patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) that validated a preoperative computed tomography-based risk scoring system originally developed in South Korea. The scoring system incorporated five parameters: (1) Tumor size; (2) Portal venous phase density; (3) Necrosis; (4) Peripancreatic infiltration; and (5) Suspected metastatic lymph nodes. While demonstrating satisfactory recurrence prediction capability without requiring complex technologies, thereby supporting clinical utility in Chinese populations, the study exhibited notable limitations. Most analyzed patients lacked neoadjuvant chemotherapy exposure, resulting in underrepresentation of low-risk subgroups. Additionally, the short follow-up duration potentially compromised long-term prognostic assessment. Contemporary advances in radiomics coupled with machine learning have enhanced multimodal data integration for PDAC management. However, clinical implementation continues to confront challenges including variability in imaging parameters, incomplete understanding of molecular underpinnings, and confounding treatment effects. Future investigations should prioritize developing multidimensional predictive frameworks that synergize radiographic, molecular, and clinical data. Prospective multicenter validation and artificial intelligence-powered real-time risk stratification systems represent essential steps to overcome current barriers in precision medicine translation, ultimately advancing personalized therapeutic strategies for PDAC.

Key Words: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Postoperative recurrence; Risk assessment system; Preoperative assessment; Radiomics

Core Tip: This editorial critically evaluated the retrospective study by Liu et al in validating a preoperative computed tomography-based risk scoring system, while high-lighting the potential of radiomics integrated with machine learning for multimodal data analysis. However, clinical translation continues to face significant challenges, including heterogeneity in imaging parameters, incomplete elucidation of molecular mechanisms, and confounding effects of therapeutic interventions. Future research should prioritize the development of multidimensional predictive frameworks that synergize radiological, molecular, and clinical data. Prospective clinical trials to validate model efficacy and artificial intelligence-driven real-time risk stratification systems represent critical initiatives to overcome current limitations in precision medicine implementation, thereby advancing personalized management strategies for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.



INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a major therapeutic challenge in global oncology due to its aggressive biological behavior and high postoperative recurrence rates. Although radical resection remains the only potentially curative intervention, the 5-year survival rate persists below 10%, with a postoperative recurrence risk reaching as high as 70% within 3 years[1,2]. Emerging as a key challenge in overcoming current prognostic limitations is the identification of high-risk recurrence populations through precision preoperative evaluation to guide therapeutic optimization. Recent advances integrating radiomics, machine learning, and multimodal clinical data have revolutionized PDAC preoperative risk stratification, with particularly notable progress in cross-population validation and multimodal integration studies of computed tomography (CT)-based risk scoring systems[3-5].

PDAC

Conventional imaging assessment demonstrates inherent limitations in quantifying tumor heterogeneity, as it primarily relies on radiologists' subjective evaluation of morphological characteristics, tissue density patterns, and invasion boundaries[6,7]. The preoperative CT-based risk stratification system developed by South Korean researchers—incorporating five imaging parameters (tumor size, portal venous phase density, tumor necrosis, peripancreatic infiltration, and suspected metastatic lymph nodes)—has demonstrated validated predictive value in indigenous populations[2], though its clinical generalizability across ethnic cohorts requires critical validation. A Chinese cohort study of 283 resectable PDAC patients has provided inaugural evidence demonstrating the model's robust risk stratification capability in Chinese populations (Table 1)[8]. Interobserver agreement analysis between two radiologists revealed a Kappa value of 0.78, confirming its clinical applicability[9]. These findings align with the Dutch nationwide study outcomes where asymptomatic recurrence patients demonstrated significantly higher treatment rates and improved survival prognosis, suggesting the potential generalizability of radiomics-based models across heterogeneous healthcare environments[10].

Table 1 Recurrence rates and median recurrence-free survival by risk stratification.
Risk groups (risk score)
Recurrence rates (reader 1)
Recurrence rates (reader 2)
Median recurrence-free survival
Low risk (< 2 points)39.0%50.0%Significantly longer
Intermediate risk (2-4 points)82.1%79.5%Shorter
High risk (≥ 5 points)84.5%88.9%The shortest

Notably, this model's evaluation metrics are exclusively derived from routine dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT scans, requiring neither specialized techniques nor invasive procedures, thereby exhibiting favorable clinical applicability[9]. The composite feature of portal venous phase tumor hypodensity (suggestive of aberrant angiogenesis) combined with tumor necrosis (reflecting metabolic activity) carries a risk weight of 2-4 points, demonstrating strong positive correlation with postoperative recurrence risk. This integration of multidimensional biomarkers enables more comprehensive characterization of tumor biological behavior compared to conventional solitary pathological parameters such as lymph node metastasis.

This study[9] demonstrates significant progress in validating the cross-population efficacy of CT-based risk stratification models, while several limitations necessitate further investigation. First, the majority of enrolled patients did not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a therapeutic intervention proven to enhance tumor resectability and reduce postoperative recurrence risk, potentially constraining the model's applicability in modern multimodal treatment regimens. Second, the proportion of low-risk tumors (≤ 2 centimeters) in the Chinese cohort (23.3%) was lower than that reported in the original Korean study, potentially compromising the model's robustness in predictive performance. Smaller tumors typically demonstrate less aggressive biological behavior with greater heterogeneity, and their underrepresentation may introduce bias in early-stage disease risk stratification. Furthermore, insufficient incorporation of population-specific epidemiological characteristics—particularly genetic variations and comorbidity distributions prevalent in Chinese cohorts—necessitates future model calibration using indigenous biomarker data. Finally, the 24-month median follow-up duration precludes comprehensive evaluation of 5-year survival rates and late-phase recurrence patterns, thereby limiting prognostic precision for long-term clinical outcomes.

The evolution of precision medicine has revealed inherent limitations in unidimensional imaging-based models, positioning the integration of multidimensional data as a critical determinant for optimizing predictive accuracy. In radiomics research, an investigation incorporating 1409 CT textural features demonstrated model efficacy using the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm, achieving training and validation area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.93 and 0.63, respectively. This framework successfully quantified tumor-stroma ratio (TSR), with TSR values demonstrating strong correlations with tumor microenvironment fibrotic status and immune evasion mechanisms in subsequent validation cohorts[5,11,12]. Elevated preoperative serum levels of cancer antigen 19-9 and C-reactive protein, along with decreased skeletal muscle index (indicative of sarcopenia), have been identified as significant predictors of adverse postoperative outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients. These findings suggest that systemic inflammatory status and metabolic dysregulation may adversely affect prognosis through their potential role in facilitating the development of micrometastases[13-15].

Significantly, machine learning exhibits distinct strengths in integrating multi-modal data. Research demonstrates that predictive models leveraging venous-phase radiomic characteristics attain 0.801 accuracy in validation cohorts, with inclusion of supplementary clinical parameters (including tumor marker concentrations and lesion morphology) augmenting the model's AUC to 0.904[16]. Multi-omics data synthesis has further proven capable of delineating cross-modality biological interactions, effectively addressing fundamental constraints of single-modality approaches[17]. These observations imply that coordinated incorporation of radiomic profiles with novel liquid biopsy markers—specifically circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutational load and longitudinal ctDNA surveillance—may refine clinical prediction models, thereby advancing evidence-based decision architectures in precision oncology.

Despite substantial advancements in current research, clinical translation continues to confront significant obstacles. Primarily, in multicenter studies, heterogeneity in CT acquisition parameters (including reconstruction kernel, slice thickness, and tube voltage) significantly impacts model generalizability. Variations in reconstruction kernels demonstrate the most substantial influence on radiomic feature stability, while adjustments in slice thickness and field of view may reduce feature reproducibility. Differences in dose output and reconstruction algorithms across CT manufacturers lead to significant variations in radiomic feature stability. To address these challenges, standardized imaging protocols or transfer learning methods could harmonize radiomic feature disparities between European and Asian medical centers[18-21]. Secondarily, the underlying mechanisms linking imaging biomarkers to molecular pathology remain incompletely characterized. The spatial mapping between TSR-related radiomic patterns and corresponding histopathological stromal proportions with T-cell infiltration densities requires elucidation through integrated spatial transcriptomic analyses. Furthermore, contemporary models predominantly derive from treatment-naïve cohorts, whereas neoadjuvant chemotherapy-induced radiographic alterations (particularly tumor regression grade variations) may introduce prediction bias, mandating prospective validation studies across diverse therapeutic contexts[22-24].

Future research should focus on three key directions. First, multidimensional predictive networks should be established through the development of integrated imaging-molecular-clinical models incorporating genomic alterations, metabolic biomarkers, and gut microbiome profiles. Second, systematic validation through prospective clinical trials should assess the clinical utility of these models in guiding neoadjuvant therapeutic decision-making. Finally, implementation of artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electronic health record (EHR) systems with real-time data integration could enable adaptive risk stratification and establish predictive-therapeutic-monitoring frameworks to support precision medicine initiatives. A nationwide study in the Netherlands demonstrated that early detection, personalized treatment, and standardized monitoring significantly influence pancreatic cancer prognosis. AI-enabled EHR systems can facilitate the translation of these findings into precision medicine tools through data aggregation, intelligent analysis, and adaptive decision-making.

CONCLUSION

The study conducted by Liu et al[8] validated the cross-population application of radiomics models, marking a significant step toward standardization in preoperative prediction of PDAC. Three key priorities for further research include: (1) Developing multidimensional predictive models that synthesize imaging, molecular, and clinical data through incorporation of genomic profiles, metabolic features, and gut microbiota characteristics; (2) Validating the clinical efficacy of these models in guiding neoadjuvant treatment strategies via prospective trials; and (3) Establishing EHR-integrated AI systems to enable dynamic risk stratification and implement predictive-therapeutic-monitoring closed-loop management frameworks. Interdisciplinary collaboration and standardized imaging protocols constitute the foundational requirements for mitigating multicenter data heterogeneity and advancing clinical translation, ultimately supporting personalized therapeutic approaches for PDAC patients.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade B

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Xia L S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang YL

References
1.  Lee JS, Han Y, Yun WG, Kwon W, Kim H, Jeong H, Seo MS, Park Y, Cho SI, Kim H, Kim JY, Seong MW, Jang JY, Park SS. Parallel Analysis of Pre- and Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA and Matched Tumor Tissues in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study. Clin Chem. 2022;68:1509-1518.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kim DW, Lee SS, Kim SO, Kim JH, Kim HJ, Byun JH, Yoo C, Kim KP, Song KB, Kim SC. Estimating Recurrence after Upfront Surgery in Patients with Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Using Pancreatic CT: Development and Validation of a Risk Score. Radiology. 2020;296:541-551.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 36]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Khalvati F, Zhang Y, Baig S, Lobo-Mueller EM, Karanicolas P, Gallinger S, Haider MA. Prognostic Value of CT Radiomic Features in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5449.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in RCA: 63]  [Article Influence: 10.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Tian N, Wu D, Zhu L, Zeng M, Li J, Wang X. A predictive model for recurrence after upfront surgery in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) by using preoperative clinical data and CT characteristics. BMC Med Imaging. 2022;22:116.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Meng Y, Zhang H, Li Q, Liu F, Fang X, Li J, Yu J, Feng X, Zhu M, Li N, Jing G, Wang L, Ma C, Lu J, Bian Y, Shao C. CT Radiomics and Machine-Learning Models for Predicting Tumor-Stroma Ratio in Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:707288.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Yang Q, Mao Y, Xie H, Qin T, Mai Z, Cai Q, Wen H, Li Y, Zhang R, Liu L. Identifying Outcomes of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and RECIST Stable Disease Using Radiomics Analysis. JCO Precis Oncol. 2022;6:e2100362.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in RCA: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Dalal V, Carmicheal J, Dhaliwal A, Jain M, Kaur S, Batra SK. Radiomics in stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions: Machine learning in action. Cancer Lett. 2020;469:228-237.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in RCA: 67]  [Article Influence: 11.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Liu XH, Xie JH, Zhu XS, Liu LH. Preoperative computed tomography-based risk stratification model validation for postoperative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma recurrence. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025;17:107804.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Xie RX, Xing YX, Sun NZ. Advancing minimally invasive surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients: Bridging evidence to practice. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025;17:108152.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
10.  Daamen LA, Groot VP, Besselink MG, Bosscha K, Busch OR, Cirkel GA, van Dam RM, Festen S, Groot Koerkamp B, Haj Mohammad N, van der Harst E, de Hingh IHJT, Intven MPW, Kazemier G, Los M, Meijer GJ, de Meijer VE, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Pranger BK, Raicu MG, Schreinemakers JMJ, Stommel MWJ, Verdonk RC, Verkooijen HM, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC; Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group. Detection, Treatment, and Survival of Pancreatic Cancer Recurrence in the Netherlands: A Nationwide Analysis. Ann Surg. 2022;275:769-775.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 42]  [Article Influence: 14.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Collao N, Sanders O, Caminiti T, Messeiller L, De Lisio M. Resistance and endurance exercise training improves muscle mass and the inflammatory/fibrotic transcriptome in a rhabdomyosarcoma model. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2023;14:781-793.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Velarde F, Ezquerra S, Delbruyere X, Caicedo A, Hidalgo Y, Khoury M. Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated transfer of mitochondria: mechanisms and functional impact. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79:177.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 52]  [Article Influence: 17.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Kim NH, Kim HJ. Preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after curative intent surgical resection. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2018;17:450-455.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Sugimoto M, Farnell MB, Nagorney DM, Kendrick ML, Truty MJ, Smoot RL, Chari ST, Moynagh MR, Petersen GM, Carter RE, Takahashi N. Decreased Skeletal Muscle Volume Is a Predictive Factor for Poorer Survival in Patients Undergoing Surgical Resection for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018;22:831-839.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in RCA: 49]  [Article Influence: 7.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Matsumoto I, Murakami Y, Shinzeki M, Asari S, Goto T, Tani M, Motoi F, Uemura K, Sho M, Satoi S, Honda G, Yamaue H, Unno M, Akahori T, Kwon AH, Kurata M, Ajiki T, Fukumoto T, Ku Y. Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: A multi-center retrospective study. Pancreatology. 2015;15:674-680.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 68]  [Cited by in RCA: 106]  [Article Influence: 10.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Lou F, Li M, Chu T, Duan H, Liu H, Zhang J, Duan K, Liu H, Wei F. Comprehensive analysis of clinical data and radiomic features from contrast enhanced CT for differentiating benign and malignant pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. Sci Rep. 2024;14:17218.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Reza MS, Qiu C, Lin X, Su KJ, Liu A, Zhang X, Gong Y, Luo Z, Tian Q, Nwadiugwu M, Liang S, Shen H, Deng HW. An Attention-Aware Multi-Task Learning Framework Identifies Candidate Targets for Drug Repurposing in Sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025;16:e13661.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Peng X, Yang S, Zhou L, Mei Y, Shi L, Zhang R, Shan F, Liu L. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Computed Tomography Radiomics for Pulmonary Nodules: A Multicenter Phantom Study. Invest Radiol. 2022;57:242-253.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in RCA: 17]  [Article Influence: 5.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vázquez J, Castro-García M, Villas MV, Mansilla Legorburo F, Sabater S. Radiomics of CT Features May Be Nonreproducible and Redundant: Influence of CT Acquisition Parameters. Radiology. 2018;288:407-415.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 295]  [Cited by in RCA: 429]  [Article Influence: 61.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Peerlings J, Woodruff HC, Winfield JM, Ibrahim A, Van Beers BE, Heerschap A, Jackson A, Wildberger JE, Mottaghy FM, DeSouza NM, Lambin P. Stability of radiomics features in apparent diffusion coefficient maps from a multi-centre test-retest trial. Sci Rep. 2019;9:4800.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 97]  [Cited by in RCA: 99]  [Article Influence: 16.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Barreto I, Lamoureux R, Olguin C, Quails N, Correa N, Rill L, Arreola M. Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20:141-151.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Groot VP, Rezaee N, Wu W, Cameron JL, Fishman EK, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Zheng L, Wolfgang CL, He J. Patterns, Timing, and Predictors of Recurrence Following Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2018;267:936-945.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 244]  [Cited by in RCA: 486]  [Article Influence: 69.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Preuss K, Thach N, Liang X, Baine M, Chen J, Zhang C, Du H, Yu H, Lin C, Hollingsworth MA, Zheng D. Using Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Radiomics and Deep Learning Applications. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:1654.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 37]  [Article Influence: 12.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Khasawneh H, Ferreira Dalla Pria HR, Miranda J, Nevin R, Chhabra S, Hamdan D, Chakraborty J, Biachi de Castria T, Horvat N. CT Imaging Assessment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Resectability after Neoadjuvant Therapy: Current Status and Perspective on the Use of Radiomics. J Clin Med. 2023;12:6821.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]