Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Radiol. Apr 28, 2025; 17(4): 103359
Published online Apr 28, 2025. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i4.103359
Spectral computed tomography parameters of primary tumors and lymph nodes for predicting tumor deposits in colorectal cancer
Yi-Fan Lai, Zhao-Ming Liang, Jia-Ying Zhang, Ding-Hua Xu, Hai-Yang Dai, The First Clinical College, Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524023, Guangdong Province, China
Yi-Fan Lai, Zhao-Ming Liang, Jing-Fang Li, Jia-Ying Zhang, Hai-Yang Dai, Department of Radiology, Huizhou Central People’s Hospital, Huizhou 516001, Guangdong Province, China
Ding-Hua Xu, Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Zhanjiang 524001, Guangdong Province, China
ORCID number: Hai-Yang Dai (0000-0001-5875-2262).
Co-corresponding authors: Ding-Hua Xu and Hai-Yang Dai.
Author contributions: Lai YF, Liang ZM, Li JF, Dai HY participated in the conception and design of the study; Lai YF, Liang ZM, Li JF, Zhang JY, Dai HY were involved in the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; Lai YF wrote the manuscript; Dai HY and Xu DH accessed and verified the study data. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript to be published. Xu DH (Guangdong Medical University) and Dai HY (Huizhou Central People’s Hospital) jointly supervised and advised Lai YF’s academic training and the research work presented in this manuscript. Both supervisors contributed equally to the guidance, oversight, and critical revision of this study, designating both as co-corresponding authors for this work. We confirm that: The order of supervisors listed reflects their institutional affiliations and has been mutually agreed upon by all parties. The designation of co-corresponding authorship aligns with their equal intellectual and supervisory contributions.
Institutional review board statement: This retrospective study was approved by Huizhou Central People’s Hospital ethics committee (No. ky112024034).
Informed consent statement: This retrospective study was approved by Huizhou Central People’s Hospital ethics committee (No. ky112024034), and the requirement for informed consent was waived.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request at d.ocean@163.com.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Hai-Yang Dai, MD, Department of Radiology, Huizhou Central People’s Hospital, No. 41 North Eling Road, Huizhou 516001, Guangdong Province, China. d.ocean@163.com
Received: November 29, 2024
Revised: March 17, 2025
Accepted: March 26, 2025
Published online: April 28, 2025
Processing time: 144 Days and 20.8 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Tumor deposits (TDs) are an independent predictor of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Enhanced follow-up and treatment monitoring for TD+ patients may improve survival rates and quality of life. However, the detection of TDs relies primarily on postoperative pathological examination, which may have a low detection rate due to sampling limitations.

AIM

To evaluate the spectral computed tomography (CT) parameters of primary tumors and the largest regional lymph nodes (LNs), to determine their value in predicting TDs in CRC.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted which included 121 patients with CRC whose complete spectral CT data were available. Patients were divided into the TDs+ group and the TDs- group on the basis of their pathological results. Spectral CT parameters of the primary CRC lesion and the largest regional LNs were measured, including the normalized iodine concentration (NIC) in both the arterial and venous phases, and the LN-to-primary tumor ratio was calculated. Statistical methods were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each spectral parameter.

RESULTS

Among the 121 CRC patients, 33 (27.2%) were confirmed to be TDs+. The risk of TDs positivity was greater in patients with positive LN metastasis, higher N stage and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 19-9 levels. The NIC (LNs in both the arterial and venous phases), NIC (primary tumors in the venous phase), and the LN-to-primary tumor ratio in both the arterial and venous phases were associated with TDs (P < 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the arterial phase LN-to-primary tumor ratio was identified as an independent predictor of TDs, demonstrating the highest diagnostic performance (area under the curve: 0.812, sensitivity: 0.879, specificity: 0.648, cutoff value: 1.145).

CONCLUSION

The spectral CT parameters of the primary colorectal tumor and the largest regional LNs, especially the LN-to-primary tumor ratio, have significant clinical value in predicting TDs in CRC.

Key Words: Spectral computed tomography; Colorectal cancer; Tumor deposits; Predicting effectiveness

Core Tip: In this study, spectral computed tomography (CT) parameters of the primary colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions and the largest regional lymph nodes (LNs) were used to predict tumor deposits in CRC. Additionally, we innovatively introduced the parameter of the LN-to-primary tumor ratio from 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT into the spectral CT study. It was found that the LN-to-primary tumor ratio has greater diagnostic efficacy than the spectral CT parameters of a single region.



INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide, accounting for approximately 900000 deaths annually due to tumor recurrence or metastasis, which results in a low five-year postoperative survival rate for patients[1]. Tumor deposits (TDs), also known as peritumoral deposits or cancer nodules, are defined in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer guidelines as isolated tumor foci found in pericolic or perirectal fat or in adjacent mesenteric fat without histological evidence of residual lymph nodes (LNs) or identifiable vascular or neural structures in the nodules. The guidelines[2,3] classify CRC patients with TDs+ and negative LN metastasis as N1c, which is considered stage III, and consequently, adjuvant chemotherapy is required. For early-stage rectal tumors with TDs+, total mesorectal excision is recommended as the definitive surgical approach rather than local excision techniques, such as transanal local excision or transanal endoscopic microsurgery[4]. Studies[3,5-7] have demonstrated that TDs are an independent predictor of poor prognosis in CRC patients, with TDs+ patients exhibiting lower disease-free survival and overall survival. Moreover, a greater number of TDs correlates with a worse prognosis[7,8]. Multiple studies[9-12] have shown that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy can reduce the number of TDs in rectal cancer patients, convert TDs+ patients to TDs- patients, and lower the rate of local recurrence. Enhanced follow-up and treatment monitoring for TDs+ patients may improve survival rates and quality of life. Currently, TDs detection relies primarily on postoperative pathological examination, which may have a low detection rate due to sampling limitations. Thus, the use of imaging examinations for preoperative TDs diagnosis has significant clinical importance.

Dual-energy spectral computed tomography (CT) can generate multiparameter images, providing more quantitative information on biological characteristics, and has been widely used in diagnosing and treating malignant tumors such as gastric cancer, liver cancer, and CRC[13]. Studies[14-18] have proven the clinical value of spectral CT in determining the CRC stage, degree of LN metastasis, degree of differentiation, degree of microsatellite instability, and degree of lymphovascular tumor thrombus. The selection of the region of interest (ROI) currently includes two methods: Primary tumor[14,15] or peritumoral LNs[17,19]. A recent study[20] utilized CT radiomics to analyze the largest peritumoral nodule and the primary tumor lesion, distinguishing TDs from LN metastasis in rectal cancer. Recent studies[21-23] using 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT measured the standardized uptake value (SUV) of both LNs and primary tumors, utilizing a new indicator, the LN-to-primary tumor SUV ratio (NTR), to predict the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. Currently, methods of simultaneously measuring LNs and primary tumors, as well as the NTR, have not yet been applied in studies involving spectral CT. This study aims to explore the predictive value of spectral CT parameters of the primary tumor and the largest regional LN in CRC for predicting TDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient characteristics

This retrospective study was approved by Huizhou Central People’s Hospital ethics committee (No. ky112024034), and the requirement for informed consent was waived. We analyzed 121 CRC patients at Huizhou Central People’s Hospital, including 64 men and 57 women aged 35-89 years (mean age 65 years), from February 2022 to February 2024. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Underwent radical CRC surgery for the first time, with postoperative pathology confirming CRC; (2) Underwent 256-slice Revolution CT dual-phase enhanced spectral CT scan within two weeks before surgery; and (3) No preoperative radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or other antitumor treatments. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Poor image quality unsuitable for spectral analysis; (2) Primary tumor volume too small to be detected via imaging; and (3) Regional LNs with short diameters of less than 3 mm. The patient recruitment flowchart is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of the patient recruitment process. TDs: Tumor deposits.
Spectral CT imaging

All patients underwent dual-phase enhanced spectral CT scans with a GE 256-slice Revolution CT. The scanning range was from the dome of the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis. The scanning parameters were as follows: Spectral scanning mode with instant switching of the tube voltage from 80 kVp to 140 kVp, a tube current of 400 mA, a detector width of 80 mm, a slice thickness of 5 mm, an interslice distance of 5 mm, a tube rotation time of 0.8 seconds, and a pitch of 0.992: 1. Enhanced scanning was performed with iodixanol (100 mL: 35 g, produced by Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.), which was injected into the patient's elbow vein via a high-pressure dual-barrel injector. The contrast agent dose was set at 1.0 mL/kg, with a flow rate of 3.5 mL/s. Real-time intelligent tracking technology was used to monitor the CT value of the abdominal aorta, and when the CT value reached 120 HU, an arterial phase spectral scan was automatically initiated to obtain arterial phase images. Venous phase scanning was performed 30 seconds after the completion of arterial phase scanning to obtain venous phase images. All the images were reconstructed via the standard (Stnd) algorithm, with the slice thickness and interslice distance adjusted to 1.25 mm to optimize image quality.

Spectral CT image analysis

The reconstructed images were automatically transferred to the GE AW4.7 workstation for analysis. An abdominal radiologist with six years of experience used the GSI Viewer software package to analyze and measure quantitative parameters of arterial- and venous-phase spectral CT images. The measurements were reviewed by a senior radiologist with over ten years of diagnostic experience, and disagreements on ROI placement were resolved through discussion. Both radiologists were blinded to all the clinical and pathological information. First, a circular ROI was placed in the solid component area of the primary tumor (avoiding hemorrhage, necrosis, vessels, and intestinal contents), and this process was repeated three times. The minimum area of each ROI was 20 mm², and maintained a 2 mm distance from the tumor edge. The average values were calculated to minimize measurement bias. The mean area of all ROIs was 106.43 mm²; range, 21.78-832.59 mm². Second, the largest regional LN in the lymphatic drainage area of the primary tumor was selected, and the ROI was placed on the largest slice of the LN, covering the entire LN as much as possible. Parameters were measured, and the long diameter, short diameter, and area of the LN were recorded. Third, a circular ROI was placed in the arterial phase (abdominal aorta or external iliac artery) to calculate the normalized iodine concentration (NIC). These ROIs were copied into arterial and venous phase images, with slight adjustments if necessary to exclude respiratory or gastrointestinal movement effects. The following spectral parameters were automatically measured by the software: The iodine concentration (IC) and the NIC (calculated as IC_tumor/IC_artery). NTR is calculated as NIC_LN/NIC_tumor. The spectral CT images and the ROIs for the assessment of the quantitative measurements are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Illustration of venous phase segmentation. The 74-year-old male patient with tumor deposits+. In the arterial and venous phases, the normalized iodine concentration of region of interest. A: Primary tumors (arrow) = 0.16, 0.49; B: The largest regional lymph nodes (dashed arrow) = 0.17, 0.48. Lymph node-to-primary tumor ratio = 1.09, 0.98.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Illustration of venous phase segmentation. The 66-year-old male patient with tumor deposits-. In the arterial and venous phases the normalized iodine concentration of region of interest: A: Primary tumors (arrow) = 0.14, 0.38; B: The largest regional lymph nodes (dashed arrow) = 0.20, 0.65. Lymph node-to-primary tumor ratio = 1.39, 1.73.
Clinical and pathological data

Clinical and pathological data were collected through the electronic medical records system. The clinical data included patient sex, age, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level (normal level: 0-5 ng/mL), and preoperative cancer antigen (CA)19-9 level (normal level: 0-30 U/mL). The pathological data included tumor location, degree of differentiation, LN metastasis status, TD status, T stage and N stage.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 27.0 software. The quantitative data are expressed as the means ± SD, and independent sample t tests were used. Categorical data are expressed as frequencies and percentages, and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test was used. Rank data were analyzed using the rank-sum test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Parameters with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (method: Forward: LR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under the curve (AUCs) were used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the model, by calculating cutoff values, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS
Pathological and clinical characteristics of the patients

A total of 121 CRC patients were included in the study, consisting of 33 TDs+ patients (27.3%) and 88 TDs- patients (72.7%). Patients with LN metastasis, advanced N stage and elevated CEA levels had a greater risk of being TDs+ (P < 0.05). An elevated CA19-9 level demonstrated edge statistical significance (P = 0.52). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of sex, age, tumor location, gross tumor type, degree of differentiation, or T stage (P > 0.05). The clinical and pathological characteristics of the patients are illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Clinical and pathological characteristics of the tumor deposits+ group and tumor deposits- group, n (%).
Characteristics

TDs+ group, n = 33
TDs- group, n = 88
Total, n = 121
P value
GenderMale17 (51.5)47 (53.4)64 (52.9)0.853
Female16 (48.5)41 (46.6)57 (47.1)
Age (years)63.9 ± 11.665.2 ± 11.464.8 ± 11.40.602
CEA Normal11 (37.9)55 (63.2)66 (56.9)0.018
Elevated18 (62.1)32 (36.8)50 (43.1)
CA19-9Normal18 (62.1)65 (80.2)83 (75.5)0.052
Elevated11 (37.9)16 (19.8)27 (24.5)
Tumor locationRight colon8 (24.2)23 (26.1)31 (25.6)0.920
Left colon14 (42.4)39 (44.3)53 (43.8)
Rectum11 (33.3)26 (29.5)37 (30.6)
Differentiation degreeLow7 (21.2)10 (11.4)17 (14)0.127
Moderate25 (75.8)72 (81.8)97 (80.2)
High1 (3)6 (6.8)7 (5.8)
Lymph node metastasisNegative13 (39.4)63 (71.6)76 (62.8)0.003
Positive20 (60.6)25 (28.4)45 (37.2)
T stageT1/T23 (9.1)18 (20.5)21 (17.4)0.142
T3/T430 (90.9)70 (79.5)100 (82.6)
N stageN00 (0)61 (69.3)61 (50.4)< 0.001
N127 (81.8)23 (26.1)50 (41.3)
N26 (18.2)4 (4.5)10 (8.3)
Comparison of the spectral CT parameters between the TDs+ and the TDs- groups

The long diameter, short diameter, and area of the LNs in the TDs+ group were greater than those in the TDs- group (P < 0.05). The LN NIC in both the arterial and venous phases was lower in the TDs+ group than in the TDs- group (P < 0.05). The NIC of the primary tumor in the venous phase was greater in the TDs+ group than in the TDs- group (P < 0.05). Regardless of the arterial or venous phase, the NTR in the TDs+ group was lower than that in the TDs- group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the NIC of the primary tumor in the arterial phase between the two groups (P > 0.05). The spectral CT parameters are illustrated in Table 2.

Table 2 Spectral computed tomography parameters of the tumor deposits+ group and tumor deposits- group.
Parameters
TDs+ group
TDs- group
T
P value
Lymph node long diameter10.38 ± 4.778.25 ± 3.11-2.8740.014
Lymph node short diameter7.96 ± 3.616.18 ± 2.00-3.45< 0.001
Lymph node area57.39 ± 42.7338.15 ± 25.22-3.049< 0.001
AP-NIC-LN0.16 ± 0.050.22 ± 0.083.570.085
AP-NIC-T0.19 ± 0.040.18 ± 0.05-0.9770.497
AP-NIC-NTR0.89 ± 0.241.27 ± 0.37-5.5730.016
VP-NIC-LN0.48 ± 0.120.56 ± 0.162.6320.018
VP-NIC-T0.54 ± 0.110.49 ± 0.11-2.140.034
VP-NIC-NTR0.90 ± 0.151.16 ± 0.265.390.004
Diagnostic performance of spectral CT parameters for predicting TDs

The results of the ROC analysis of the long diameter, short diameter, and area of the LNs and the quantitative spectral CT parameters of the primary tumor and LNs are shown in Table 3 and Figure 4. The AUC of the short diameter of the LNs was 0.658 (sensitivity: 0.485, specificity: 0.864, cutoff value: 7.750 mm), which was greater than that of the long diameter and area of the LNs. In both the arterial and venous phases, the AUC of the combined parameter NTR, which includes the primary tumor and the largest regional LN parameters, was significantly greater than the spectral CT parameters of any single region (AUC, 0.631-0.721). Among all the quantitative parameters, the AUC of the arterial phase (AP)-NIC-NTR was the highest at 0.812 (sensitivity: 0.879, specificity: 0.648, cutoff value: 1.145). All parameters with statistical significance in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (method: Forward: LR). As shown in Table 4, AP-NIC-NTR was an independent predictor of TDs.

Figure 4
Figure 4 Receiver operating characteristic curves of the quantitative parameters used for the differential diagnosis of tumor deposits+ and tumor deposits- patients. The areas under the curve of arterial phase-normalized iodine concentration-lymph node-to-primary tumor ratio was the highest at 0.812 (sensitivity: 0.879, specificity: 0.648, cutoff value: 1.145). AP: Arterial phase; VP: Venous phase; NIC: Normalized iodine concentration; LN: Lymph node; T: Primary tumor; NTR: Lymph node-to-primary tumor ratio.
Table 3 Results of the receiver operating characteristic analysis of the quantitative parameters for the differential diagnosis of the tumor deposits+ group and tumor deposits- group.
Parameters
AUC
95%CI
Sensitivity
Specificity
Cutoff value
P value
Lymph node long diameter0.6510.535-0.7660.606 0.705 8.750 0.011
Lymph node short diameter0.6580.538-0.7770.485 0.864 7.750 0.008
Lymph node area0.6470.531-0.7630.515 0.773 45.419 0.013
AP-NIC-LN0.7210.625-0.8170.939 0.432 0.225 < 0.001
AP-NIC-T0.5870.479-0.6950.818 0.386 0.155 0.141
AP-NIC-NTR0.8120.730-0.8950.879 0.648 1.145 < 0.001
VP-NIC-LN0.6340.528-0.7400.879 0.364 0.610 0.024
VP-NIC-T0.6310.527-0.7360.576 0.659 0.514 0.026
VP-NIC-NTR0.8030.724-0.8810.909 0.614 1.090 < 0.001
Table 4 Logistic regression analysis.

Univariate
Multivariate
OR (95%CI)
P value
OR (95%CI)
P value
AP-NIC-LN0.000 (0.000, 0.001)< 0.001
AP-NIC-NTR0.013 (0.002, 0.086)< 0.0010.013 (0.002, 0.086)< 0.001
VP-NIC-LN0.019 (0.001, 0.424)0.012
VP-NIC-T44.143 (1.226, 1589.062)0.038
VP-NIC-NTR0.003 (0.000, 0.043)< 0.001
DISCUSSION

The presence of TDs is an independent indicator of poor prognosis in CRC patients[3,5-7]. However, predicting TDs through imaging remains challenging. Thus, accurate prediction of TDs by spectral CT is crucial, as it aids in treatment planning and prognosis assessment. Our study demonstrated that the spectral CT quantitative parameters of the primary tumor and the largest regional LNs were related to TDs. The new indicator, the NTR had greater diagnostic value for preoperatively predicting TDs.

This study confirmed that TDs+ status is significantly positively correlated with LN metastasis, larger long and short diameters, the area of the LNs, advanced N stage and elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels, which is consistent with reports in the literature[3,5,24]. Clinically, elevated CEA and CA19-9 levels indicate increased tumor aggressiveness and metastasis in CRC patients[25]. More aggressive and metastatic tumors are more likely to have LN metastasis, distant metastasis, and TDs. A recent study[24] of 770 CRC patients also indicated that TDs were associated with LN metastasis, advanced T category, poorly differentiated tumors, microsatellite stable subtype, and lymphovascular and perineural invasion (P < 0.05). However, in our study, TDs were not associated with advanced T stage or poorly differentiated tumors (P > 0.05). This discrepancy might be due to two factors: First, primary lesions in T1/T2 stage tumors are relatively small, making them difficult to detect by imaging; thus, some patients were excluded from the study (the proportion of T1/T2 stage patients in our study was 14.7%, whereas that reported in the literature was 35.3%)[24]. Second, the small sample size in our study may have introduced bias.

Spectral CT switches instantaneously between tube voltages of 80 kVp and 140 kVp during a single scan, obtaining data at two energy levels and providing more quantitative information. The IC is a quantitative parameter reflecting the iodine content in tissues, indirectly indicating the tissue blood supply and providing insights into the angiogenesis and hemodynamic status of lesions[26]. We used the NIC to minimize differences due to cardiac hemodynamics and body weight among patients. Our study revealed that in the largest regional LNs, the NIC in both the arterial and venous phases was lower in the TDs+ group than in the TDs- group. This may be because the largest regional LNs are more likely to be metastatic. Metastatic LNs have fewer blood vessels and are more prone to necrosis and liquefaction, leading to a reduced blood supply and lower NIC. Previous studies[27,28] have also shown that the IC in both the arterial and venous phases is significantly lower in metastatic CRC LNs than in non-metastatic LNs. Huang et al[29] reported that in lung cancer patients, the IC of mediastinal metastatic LNs was lower than that of non-metastatic LNs. The greater the degree of malignancy of a tumor, the greater its ability to metastasize. Tumors produce vascular endothelial growth factors and other substances to promote the formation of new blood vessels[30], leading to a richer blood supply and higher NIC in the primary tumor lesion. However, no studies have proved a direct correlation between TDs positivity and the blood supply to the primary tumor lesion; this correlation can only be indirectly inferred from LN metastasis, TNM stage, and degree of differentiation. Previous studies[31,32] have shown that a high angiogenesis intensity is closely related to invasive histopathological characteristics, such as LN metastasis and degree of differentiation. Cao et al[33] reported that the NIC of primary tumor lesions in both the arterial and venous phases was greater in the LN metastasis group than in the non-metastasis group. Our study revealed that only the NIC in the venous phase was significantly greater in the TDs+ group than in the TDs- group, whereas the NIC in the arterial phase was not statistically significant. We hypothesize that this may be because, in the arterial phase, the contrast agent is still present in larger blood vessels and has not yet diffused into the tumor microvessels and perivascular spaces. Chuang-Bo et al[18] reported that the NIC of highly differentiated CRC tumors was significantly lower than that of poorly differentiated tumors (18 patients in the highly differentiated group and 29 patients in the poorly differentiated group). The lack of significant differences in the degree of tumor differentiation between the groups in our study may be due to differences in grouping.

Recent studies[34] utilizing 18F- FDG PET/CT have revealed that the NTR (LN-to-primary tumor SUV ratio) is negatively correlated with poor prognosis in various malignant tumors, including those of the head and neck, endometrium, lung, breast, and nasopharynx. However, our findings suggest a negative correlation between NTR and TDs. Previous studies have shown that TDs are positively correlated with poor prognosis in CRC patients. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the parameters measured; our study measured NIC via spectral CT, whereas PET/CT studies measured the SUV. Research by Kupik et al[35] demonstrated no correlation between spectral CT parameters and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters in primary tumors and the LNs of patients with lung cancer. Additionally, in tumors smaller than 3 cm, a moderate negative correlation exists between the spectral CT parameters and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters (r = -0.456, -0.527)[35]. Therefore, we believe that spectral CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters, such as NTR, reflect different tumor characteristics and cannot be directly compared. Our study innovatively introduced the new parameter NTR into spectral CT research. We found that the arterial- and venous-phase NTR had AUCs of 0.803-0.812, which were greater than those of the individual primary tumor and LN spectral parameters (AUC: 0.587-0.721). Among these, the AUC for AP-NTR-NIC was the highest (AUC 0.812, sensitivity, 0.879, specificity, 0.648; cutoff value, 1.145).

The diagnosis of TDs from imaging data is currently challenging. Most current studies have employed radiomic methods. Zhang et al[20] analyzed the radiomic features of the largest peritumoral nodule and the primary tumor via radiomics and reported that a combined radiomic model had the highest AUC for differentiating rectal cancer TDs from LN metastasis, surpassing models based solely on the largest peritumoral nodule or the primary tumor. Li et al[36] used intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined radiomics models, achieving an AUC of 0.773-0.874 in the validation set for diagnosing TDs. However, radiomics requires complex calculations of high-dimensional image data, making it difficult to apply widely in clinical practice. Our study utilized spectral CT parameters of the primary tumor and the largest regional LNs, which are more readily extractable. Compared with the high cost of 18F-FDG PET/CT, spectral CT provides both anatomical and functional information during a single enhanced CT examination.

Our study has several limitations. First, CRC patients with LNs smaller than 3 mm or undetectable LNs were not included. Second, despite measurements being performed by two radiologists, there might still be variability in ROI placement. Third, this was a single-center retrospective study with a relatively small number of cases, and further multicenter validation is needed in the future.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the spectral CT parameters of the primary colorectal tumor and the largest regional LN have clinical value in predicting TDs, with the new parameter NTR providing greater value than parameters of the primary tumor or LNs alone.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Radiology, nuclear medicine and medical imaging

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade C

P-Reviewer: Xu Y S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang WB

References
1.  Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-249.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50630]  [Cited by in RCA: 60863]  [Article Influence: 15215.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (171)]
2.  Weiser MR. AJCC 8th Edition: Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25:1454-1455.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 294]  [Cited by in RCA: 608]  [Article Influence: 86.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Delattre JF, Selcen Oguz Erdogan A, Cohen R, Shi Q, Emile JF, Taieb J, Tabernero J, André T, Meyerhardt JA, Nagtegaal ID, Svrcek M. A comprehensive overview of tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: Towards a next TNM classification. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;103:102325.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Ratto C, Ricci R, Rossi C, Morelli U, Vecchio FM, Doglietto GB. Mesorectal microfoci adversely affect the prognosis of patients with rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45:733-42; discussion 742.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 59]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Basnet S, Lou QF, Liu N, Rana R, Shah A, Khadka M, Warrier H, Sigdel S, Dhakal S, Devkota A, Mishra R, Sapkota G, Zheng L, Ge HY. Tumor deposit is an independent prognostic indicator in patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer. J Cancer. 2018;9:3979-3985.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in RCA: 33]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Lord AC, D'Souza N, Pucher PH, Moran BJ, Abulafi AM, Wotherspoon A, Rasheed S, Brown G. Significance of extranodal tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2017;82:92-102.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in RCA: 60]  [Article Influence: 7.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Moon JY, Lee MR, Ha GW. Prognostic value of tumor deposits for long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2022;37:141-151.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
8.  Zheng K, Zheng N, Xin C, Zhou L, Sun G, Wen R, Zhang H, Yu G, Bai C, Zhang W. The Prognostic Significance of Tumor Deposit Count for Colorectal Cancer Patients after Radical Surgery. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2020;2020:2052561.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in RCA: 12]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ratto C, Ricci R, Valentini V, Castri F, Parello A, Gambacorta MA, Cellini N, Vecchio FM, Doglietto GB. Neoplastic mesorectal microfoci (MMF) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: clinical and prognostic implications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:853-861.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Kinoshita H, Watanabe T, Yanagisawa A, Nagawa H, Kato Y, Muto T. Pathological changes of advanced lower-rectal cancer by preoperative radiotherapy. Hepatogastroenterology. 2004;51:1362-1366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Chandramohan A, Mittal R, Dsouza R, Yezzaji H, Eapen A, Simon B, John R, Singh A, Ram TS, Jesudason MR, Masih D, Karuppusami R. Prognostic significance of MR identified EMVI, tumour deposits, mesorectal nodes and pelvic side wall disease in locally advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:428-438.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 24]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Zhang LN, Xiao WW, Xi SY, OuYang PY, You KY, Zeng ZF, Ding PR, Zhang HZ, Pan ZZ, Xu RH, Gao YH. Tumor deposits: markers of poor prognosis in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Oncotarget. 2016;7:6335-6344.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Chen M, Jiang Y, Zhou X, Wu D, Xie Q. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Detecting and Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Malignant Tumor Patients: A Comprehensive Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024;14.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Wu J, Lv Y, Wang N, Zhao Y, Zhang P, Liu Y, Chen A, Li J, Li X, Guo Y, Wu T, Liu A. The value of single-source dual-energy CT imaging for discriminating microsatellite instability from microsatellite stability human colorectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:3782-3790.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in RCA: 50]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Yuan X, Quan X, Che XL, Xu LL, Yang CM, Zhang XD, Shu J. Preoperative prediction of the lymphovascular tumor thrombus of colorectal cancer with the iodine concentrations from dual-energy spectral CT. BMC Med Imaging. 2023;23:103.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Yang Z, Zhang X, Fang M, Li G, Duan X, Mao J, Shen J. Preoperative Diagnosis of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer With Quantitative Parameters From Dual-Energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;213:W17-W25.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in RCA: 28]  [Article Influence: 4.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Wang D, Zhuang Z, Wu S, Chen J, Fan X, Liu M, Zhu H, Wang M, Zou J, Zhou Q, Zhou P, Xue J, Meng X, Ju S, Zhang L. A Dual-Energy CT Radiomics of the Regional Largest Short-Axis Lymph Node Can Improve the Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Rectal Cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:846840.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 19]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Chuang-Bo Y, Tai-Ping H, Hai-Feng D, Yong-Jun J, Xi-Rong Z, Guang-Ming M, Chenglong R, Jun W, Yong Y. Quantitative assessment of the degree of differentiation in colon cancer with dual-energy spectral CT. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:2591-2596.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in RCA: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Qiu L, Hu J, Weng Z, Liu S, Jiang G, Cai X. A prospective study of dual-energy computed tomography for differentiating metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes of colorectal cancer. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021;11:3448-3459.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Zhang YC, Li M, Jin YM, Xu JX, Huang CC, Song B. Radiomics for differentiating tumor deposits from lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2022;28:3960-3970.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Cho H, Kim SH, Kim H, Koh YW, Kim SH, Choi EC, Yun M. Lymph Node With the Highest FDG Uptake Predicts Distant Metastasis-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43:e220-e225.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Chung HH, Cheon GJ, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS. Prognostic value of lymph node-to-primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:47-55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Hung TM, Fan KH, Kang CJ, Huang SF, Lin CY, Ho AT, Wang HM, Hsieh JC, Cheng AJ, Ng SH, Chang JT. Lymph node-to-primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio on PET predicts distant metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2020;110:104756.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 13]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Hakki L, Khan A, Do E, Gonen M, Firat C, Vakiani E, Shia J, Widmar M, Wei IH, Smith JJ, Pappou EP, Nash GM, Paty PB, Garcia-Aguilar J, Weiser MR. Tumour deposits are independently associated with recurrence in colon cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2024;26:459-465.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Li M, Zhang J, Dan Y, Yao Y, Dai W, Cai G, Yang G, Tong T. A clinical-radiomics nomogram for the preoperative prediction of lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancer. J Transl Med. 2020;18:46.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in RCA: 75]  [Article Influence: 15.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Kong D, Chen X, Gao P, Zhao K, Zheng C, Zhou H. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in patients with malignant tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13:3050-3065.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Kato T, Uehara K, Ishigaki S, Nihashi T, Arimoto A, Nakamura H, Kamiya T, Oshiro T, Ebata T, Nagino M. Clinical significance of dual-energy CT-derived iodine quantification in the diagnosis of metastatic LN in colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1464-1470.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in RCA: 23]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Liu H, Yan F, Pan Z, Lin X, Luo X, Shi C, Chen X, Wang B, Zhang H. Evaluation of dual energy spectral CT in differentiating metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: Initial experience. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:228-234.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 51]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Huang S, Meng H, Cen R, Ni Z, Li X, Suwal S, Chen H. Use quantitative parameters in spectral computed tomography for the differential diagnosis of metastatic mediastinal lymph nodes in lung cancer patients. J Thorac Dis. 2021;13:4703-4713.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Kim YE, Lim JS, Choi J, Kim D, Myoung S, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Perfusion parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rectal cancer: correlation with microvascular density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression. Korean J Radiol. 2013;14:878-885.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in RCA: 26]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Chan E. Angiogenesis in Colorectal Cancer: Antibodies. Cancer J. 2016;22:179-181.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Gurzu S, Jung J, Azamfirei L, Mezei T, Cîmpean AM, Szentirmay Z. The angiogenesis in colorectal carcinomas with and without lymph node metastases. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2008;49:149-152.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Cao Y, Zhang J, Bao H, Zhang G, Yan X, Wang Z, Ren J, Chai Y, Zhao Z, Zhou J. Development of a Nomogram Combining Clinical Risk Factors and Dual-Energy Spectral CT Parameters for the Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11:689176.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 11]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Yap WK, Hsu KH, Wang TH, Lin CH, Kang CJ, Huang SM, Lin HC, Hung TM, Chang KP, Tsai TY. The prognostic value of lymph node to primary tumor standardized uptake value ratio in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Ann Nucl Med. 2024;38:607-618.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Kupik O, Metin Y, Eren G, Orhan Metin N, Arpa M. A comparison study of dual-energy spectral CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT in primary tumors and lymph nodes of lung cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2021;27:275-282.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Li H, Chen XL, Liu H, Liu YS, Li ZL, Pang MH, Pu H. MRI-based multiregional radiomics for preoperative prediction of tumor deposit and prognosis in resectable rectal cancer: a bicenter study. Eur Radiol. 2023;33:7561-7572.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]