Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers

doi:10.4329/wjr.123720

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 18, Issue 9

This Article

(2)

(0)

(2)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Radiology

ISSN

1949-8470

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Radiol. Sep 28, 2026; 18(9): 123720
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.4329/wjr.123720

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 1 Segmentation example of all three software programs. A: Synapse 3D; B: Syngo.via; C: Osirix^®.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 2 Bland Altman plots and scatter plot of the total liver volumes among the three software programs. A: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between Syngo.via and Synapse 3D; B: Scatter plot of mean differences between Syngo.via and Synapse 3D; C: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between Syngo.via and OsiriX^® for total liver volume; D: Scatter plot of mean differences between Syngo.via and OsiriX^®; E: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between Osirix^® and Synapse 3D; F: Scatter plot of mean differences between OsiriX^® and Synapse 3D. TLV: Total liver volume.

Open in New Tab Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Bland Altman plots and graphs of segment II/III volumes among the three software programs. A: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between Syngo.via and Synapse 3D; B: Scatter plot of mean differences between Syngo.via and Synapse 3D; C: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between Syngo.via and OsiriX^® for total liver volume; D: Scatter plot of mean differences between Syngo.via and OsiriX^®; E: Bland Altman plots of mean differences between OsiriX^® and Synapse 3D; F: Scatter plot of mean differences between OsiriX^® and Synapse 3D. SII/III: Segment II/III.

Citation: van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123720.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123720

van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.123720]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.