This preliminary study aims to assess the image quality of enhanced-resolution deep learning reconstruction (ER-DLR) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and compare it with non-ER-DLR MRCP images.

Our retrospective study incorporated 34 patients diagnosed with biliary and pancreatic disorders. We obtained MRCP images using a single breath-hold MRCP on a 3T MRI system. We reconstructed MRCP images with ER-DLR (matrix = 768 × 960) and without ER-DLR (matrix = 256 × 320). Quantitative evaluation involved measuring the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct and periductal tissues, and slope. Two radiologists independently scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality for the 2 image types using a 4-point scale. Results are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR), and we compared quantitative and qualitative scores employing the Wilcoxon test.

In quantitative analyses, ER-DLR significantly improved SNR (21.08 [IQR: 14.85, 31.5] vs 15.07 [IQR: 9.57, 25.23], P  < 0.001), CNR (19.29 [IQR: 13.87, 24.98] vs 11.23 [IQR: 8.98, 15.74], P  < 0.001), contrast (0.96 [IQR: 0.94, 0.97] vs 0.9 [IQR: 0.87, 0.92], P  < 0.001), and slope of MRCP (0.62 [IQR: 0.56, 0.66] vs 0.49 [IQR: 0.45, 0.53], P  < 0.001). The qualitative evaluation demonstrated significant improvements in the perceived noise ( P  < 0.001), contrast ( P  = 0.013), sharpness ( P  < 0.001), and overall image quality ( P  < 0.001).

ER-DLR markedly increased the resolution, SNR, and CNR of breath-hold-MRCP compared to cases without ER-DLR.

The advances in artificial intelligence (AI) technology in recent years have been remarkable, and the field of radiology is at the forefront of applying and implementing these technologies in daily clinical practice. Radiologists must keep up with this trend and continually update their knowledge. This narrative review discusses the application of artificial intelligence in the field of musculoskeletal imaging. For image generation, we focused on the clinical application of deep learning reconstruction and the recently emerging MRI-based cortical bone imaging. For automated diagnostic support, we provided an overview of qualitative diagnosis, including classifications essential for daily practice, and quantitative diagnosis, which can serve as imaging biomarkers for treatment decision making and prognosis prediction. Finally, we discussed current issues in the use of AI, the application of AI in the diagnosis of rare diseases, and the role of AI-based diagnostic imaging in preventive medicine as part of our outlook for the future.

Super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) is a promising tool for improving image quality by enhancing spatial resolution compared to conventional deep learning reconstruction (DLR). This study aimed to evaluate whether SR-DLR improves microbleed detection and visualization in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to DLR. This retrospective study included 69 patients (66.2 ± 13.8 years; 44 females) who underwent 3 T brain MRI with T2*-weighted 2D gradient echo and 3D flow-sensitive black blood imaging (reference standard) between June and August 2024. T2*-weighted images were reconstructed using SR-DLR and DLR. Three blinded readers detected microbleeds and assessed image quality, including microbleed and normal structure visibility, sharpness, noise, artifacts, and overall quality. Quantitative analysis involved measuring signal intensity along the septum pellucidum. Microbleed detection performance was analyzed using jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis, while image quality was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired t-test. SR-DLR significantly outperformed DLR in microbleed detection (figure of merit: 0.690 vs. 0.645, p < 0.001). SR-DLR also demonstrated higher sensitivity for microbleed detection. Qualitative analysis showed better microbleed visualization for two readers (p < 0.001) and improved image sharpness for all readers (p ≤ 0.008). Quantitative analysis revealed enhanced sharpness, especially in full width at half maximum and edge rise slope (p < 0.001). SR-DLR improved image sharpness and quality, leading to better microbleed detection and visualization in brain MRI compared to DLR.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a key modality for studying brain microstructure, but its signals are highly susceptible to noise due to the thermal motion of water molecules and interactions with tissue microarchitecture, leading to significant signal attenuation and a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this paper, we propose a novel approach, a Cycle-Conditional Diffusion Model (Cycle-CDM) using unpaired data learning, aimed at improving DWI quality and reliability through noise correction. Cycle-CDM leverages a cycle-consistent translation architecture to bridge the domain gap between noise-contaminated and noise-free DWIs, enabling the restoration of high-quality images without requiring paired datasets. By utilizing two conditional diffusion models, Cycle-CDM establishes data interrelationships between the two types of DWIs, while incorporating synthesized anatomical priors from the cycle translation process to guide noise removal. In addition, we introduce specific constraints to preserve anatomical fidelity, allowing Cycle-CDM to effectively learn the underlying noise distribution and achieve accurate denoising. Our experiments conducted on simulated datasets, as well as children and adolescents' datasets with strong clinical relevance. Our results demonstrate that Cycle-CDM outperforms comparative methods, such as U-Net, CycleGAN, Pix2Pix, MUNIT and MPPCA, in terms of noise correction performance. We demonstrated that Cycle-CDM can be generalized to DWIs with head motion when they were acquired using different MRI scannsers. Importantly, the denoised DWI data produced by Cycle-CDM exhibit accurate preservation of underlying tissue microstructure, thus substantially improving their medical applicability.

This study compared the contrast characteristics of synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with conventional MRI in normal brain tissue and tumor-related areas.

A retrospective analysis was performed on 60 patients who underwent noncontrast synthetic and conventional MRIs. Synthetic MRI was reconstructed to match conventional MRI parameters using magnetization-prepared 2 rapid acquisition gradient echoes and multiple spin echo sequences. The contrast in T1-weighted (T1WI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and T2-weighted images (T2WI) was assessed across various brain regions and tumor-related areas. Relaxation times and dynamic range were analyzed, and a five-point visual assessment was conducted for overall image quality.

Synthetic MRI demonstrated significantly higher contrast in T1WI across all normal brain regions and most tumor-related areas (P < 0.01). For FLAIR, synthetic MRI exhibited superior contrast around the putamen (P < 0.05) but variable results in other regions. In T2WI, synthetic MRI showed higher contrast overall (P < 0.01), though conventional MRI performed better in some comparisons. Relaxation times of synthetic MRI were generally consistent with literature values but differed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and lesion areas. The dynamic range of synthetic MRI was narrower. Visual assessments showed that synthetic MRI outperformed conventional MRI in all sequences except FLAIR (P < 0.01).

Synthetic MRI provided superior overall image quality for T1WI and T2WI, particularly achieving higher T1WI contrast. However, synthetic FLAIR had inferior overall quality despite better contrast around the putamen. Caution is needed in T2WI for CSF and edema depiction, which have relatively long T2 relaxation times.

To evaluate the performance of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) based on Adaptive-Compressed sensing (CS)-Network for brain MRI and validate it in a clinical setting.

Ten healthy volunteers and 22 consecutive patients were prospectively enrolled. Volunteers underwent 3D brain MRI including T1 without CS factor (9:16 min, reference standard); with CS factor of 2 without DLR (CS2, 4:6 min); with CS factor of 2 with DLR (DLR-CS2); with CS factor of 4 without DLR (CS4, 2:6 min); and with CS factor of 4 with DLR (DLR-CS4). The patients' MRI included the CS2 and DLR-CS4. The volumes of lateral ventricles, hippocampus, choroid plexus, and white matter hypointensity were calculated and compared among the sequences. Three radiologists independently assessed anatomical conspicuity, overall image quality, artifacts, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and sharpness using a 5-point scale for each sequence.

Applying acceleration factors of 2 and 4 reduced the scan time to 65.4% and 33.5%, respectively, of that of the reference standard. Volumes of all the measured subregions showed no significant differences among different sequences in all participants. In qualitative analysis, the interrater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.844-0.926). In volunteers, quality of DLR-CS4 were comparable to those of CS2 for all metrics except for the overall image quality and SNR despite a 51.2% scan time reduction. In patients, DLR-CS4 showed quality comparable to that of CS2 for all metrics.

DLR allowed the scan time reduction by at least half without sacrificing image quality and volumetric quantification accuracy, supporting its reliability and efficiency.

To compare the image quality obtained using two accelerated high-resolution 3D fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) techniques for the brain-deep learning-reconstruction SPACE (DL-SPACE) and Wave-CAIPI FLAIR.

A total of 123 participants who underwent DL-SPACE and Wave-CAIPI FLAIR brain imaging were retrospectively reviewed. In a qualitative analysis, two radiologists rated the quality of each image, including the overall image quality, artifacts, sharpness, fine-structure conspicuity, and lesion conspicuity based on Likert scales. In a quantitative analysis, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and lesion and the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for a lesion were calculated and compared. Moreover, the volumes of white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) obtained with the two techniques were automatically quantified and compared.

The DL-SPACE FLAIR technique demonstrated a significantly higher fine-structure conspicuity (P < 0.001), lower degree of artifacts (P < 0.001) and higher overall image quality (P = 0.001). The mean SNR values were significantly higher with the DL-SPACE FLAIR technique (NAWM, 43.95 vs. 31.6; lesion, 31.35 vs. 21.28; all, P < 0.001). Additionally, the mean CNR of the WMH was significantly higher with the DL-SPACE FLAIR technique (11.34 vs. 8.22; P < 0.001). The periventricular and deep WMH volumes were significantly larger with the DL-SPACE FLAIR technique (1.91 ± 4.69 vs. 1.54 ± 4.18; P < 0.001 and 0.26 ± 0.42 vs. 0.23 ± 0.38; P = 0.002, respectively).

The DL-SPACE FLAIR technique produced images with superior quality, SNR and CNR compared with the Wave-CAIPI FLAIR technique with the same acquisition time.

To evaluate deep learning-reconstructed (DLR)-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images generated from undersampled data, compare them with fully sampled and rapidly acquired FLAIR images, and assess their potential for white matter hyperintensity evaluation.

We examined 30 patients with white matter hyperintensities, obtaining fully sampled FLAIR images (standard FLAIR, std-FLAIR). We created accelerated FLAIR (acc-FLAIR) images using one-third of the fully sampled data and applied deep learning to generate DLR-FLAIR images. Three neuroradiologists assessed the quality (amount of noise and gray/white matter contrast) in all three image types. The reproducibility of hyperintensities was evaluated by comparing a subset of 100 hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images with those in the std-FLAIR images. Quantitatively, similarities and errors of the entire image and the focused regions on white matter hyperintensities in acc-FLAIR and DLR-FLAIR images were measured against std-FLAIR images using structural similarity index measure (SSIM), regional SSIM, normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), and regional NRMSE values.

All three neuroradiologists evaluated DLR-FLAIR as having significantly less noise and higher image quality scores compared with std-FLAIR and acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001). All three neuroradiologists assigned significantly higher frontal lobe gray/white matter visibility scores for DLR-FLAIR than for acc-FLAIR (p < 0.001); two neuroradiologists attributed significantly higher scores for DLR-FLAIR than for std-FLAIR (p < 0.05). Regarding white matter hyperintensities, all three neuroradiologists significantly preferred DLR-FLAIR (p < 0.0001). DLR-FLAIR exhibited higher similarity to std-FLAIR in terms of visibility of the hyperintensities, with 97% of the hyperintensities rated as nearly identical or equivalent. Quantitatively, DLR-FLAIR demonstrated significantly higher SSIM and regional SSIM values than acc-FLAIR, with significantly lower NRMSE and regional NRMSE values (p < 0.0001).

DLR-FLAIR can reduce scan time and generate images of similar quality to std-FLAIR in patients with white matter hyperintensities. Therefore, DLR-FLAIR may serve as an effective method in traditional magnetic resonance imaging protocols.

Follicle count, a pivotal metric in the adjunct diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), is often underestimated when assessed via transvaginal ultrasonography compared to MRI. Nevertheless, the repeatability of follicle counting using traditional MR images is still compromised by motion artifacts or inadequate spatial resolution. In this prospective study involving 22 PCOS patients, we employed periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) and single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) T2-weighted sequences to suppress motion artifacts in high-resolution ovarian MRI. Additionally, deep learning (DL) reconstruction was utilized to compensate noise in SSFSE imaging. We compared the performance of DL reconstruction SSFSE (SSFSE-DL) images with conventional reconstruction SSFSE (SSFSE-C) and PROPELLER images in follicle detection, employing qualitative indices (blurring artifacts, subjective noise, and conspicuity of follicles) and the repeatability of follicle number per ovary (FNPO) assessment. Despite similar subjective noise between SSFSE-DL and PROPELLER as assessed by one observer, SSFSE-DL images outperformed SSFSE-C and PROPELLER images across all three qualitative indices, resulting in enhanced repeatability in FNPO assessment. These results highlighted the potential of DL reconstruction high-resolution SSFSE imaging as a more dependable method for identifying polycystic ovary, thus facilitating more accurate diagnosis of PCOS in future clinical practices.

The aim of this study was to compare image quality features and lesion characteristics between a faster deep learning (DL) reconstructed T2-weighted (T2-w) fast spin-echo (FSE) Dixon sequence with super-resolution (T2DL) and a conventional T2-w FSE Dixon sequence (T2STD) for breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

This prospective study was conducted between November 2022 and April 2023 using a 3T scanner. Both T2DL and T2STD sequences were acquired for each patient. Quantitative analysis was based on region-of-interest (ROI) measurements of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Qualitative analysis was performed independently by two radiologists using Likert scales to evaluate various image quality features, morphology, and diagnostic confidence for cysts and breast cancers. Reader preference between T2DL and T2STD was assessed via side-by-side comparison, and inter-reader reliability was also analyzed.

Total of 151 women were enrolled, with 140 women (mean age: 52 ± 14 years; 85 cysts and 31 breast cancers) included in the final analysis. The acquisition time was 110 s ± 0 for T2DL compared to 266 s ± 0 for T2STD. SNR and CNR were significantly higher in T2DL (P < 0.001). T2DL was associated with higher image quality scores, reduced noise, and fewer artifacts (P < 0.001). All evaluated anatomical regions (breast and axilla), breast implants, and bone margins were rated higher in T2DL (P ≤ 0.008), except for bone marrow, which scored higher in T2STD (P < 0.001). Scores for conspicuity, sharpness/margins, and microstructure of cysts and breast cancers were higher in T2DL (P ≤ 0.002). Diagnostic confidence for cysts was improved with T2DL (P < 0.001). Readers significantly preferred T2DL over T2STD in side-by-side comparisons (P < 0.001).

T2DL effectively corrected for SNR loss caused by accelerated image acquisition and provided a 58% reduction in acquisition time compared to T2STD. This led to fewer artifacts and improved overall image quality. Thus, T2DL is feasible and has the potential to replace conventional T2-w sequences for breast MRI examinations.

To prospectively evaluate a deep learning-based denoising reconstruction (DLR) for improved resolution and image quality in musculoskeletal (MSK) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Images from 137 contrast-weighted sequences in 40 MSK patients were evaluated. Each sequence was performed twice, first with the routine parameters and reconstructed with a routine reconstruction filter (REF), then with higher resolution and reconstructed with DLR, and with three conventional reconstruction filters (NL2, GA43, GA53). The five reconstructions (REF, DLR, NL2, GA43, and GA53) were de-identified, randomized, and blindly reviewed by three MSK radiologists using eight scoring criteria and a forced ranking. Quantitative SNR, CNR, and structure's full width at half maximum (FWHM) for resolution assessment were measured and compared. To account for repeated measures, Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) with Bonferroni adjustment was used to compare the reader's scores, SNR, CNR, and FWHM between DLR vs. NL2, GA43, GA53, and REF.

Compared to the routine REF images, the resolution was improved by 47.61% with DLR from 0.39 ± 0.15 mm2 to 0.20 ± 0.06 mm2 (p < 0.001). Per-sequence average scan time was shortened by 7.93% with DLR from 165.58 ± 21.86 s to 152.45 ± 25.65 s (p < 0.001). Based on the average scores, DLR images were rated significantly higher in all image quality criteria and the forced ranking (p < 0.001).

This prospective clinical evaluation demonstrated that DLR allows approximately two times finer resolution and improved image quality compared to the standard-of-care images.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of iterative motion correction (IMC) on reducing artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR). The study included 10 volunteers (between September 2023 and December 2023) and 30 patients (between June 2022 and July 2022) for quantitative and qualitative analyses, respectively. Volunteers were instructed to remain still during the first MRI with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence (FLAIR) and to move during the second scan. IMCoff DLR images were reconstructed from the raw data of the former acquisition; IMCon and IMCoff DLR images were reconstructed from the latter acquisition. After registration of the motion images, the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) was calculated using motionless images as reference. For qualitative analyses, IMCon and IMCoff FLAIR DLR images of the patients were reconstructed and evaluated by three blinded readers in terms of motion artifacts, noise, and overall quality. SSIM for IMCon images was 0.952, higher than that for IMCoff images (0.949) (p < 0.001). In qualitative analyses, although noise in IMCon images was rated as increased by two of the three readers (both p < 0.001), all readers agreed that motion artifacts and overall quality were significantly better in IMCon images than in IMCoff images (all p < 0.001). In conclusion, IMC reduced motion artifacts in brain FLAIR DLR images while maintaining similarity to motionless images.

To develop a new MR coronary angiography (MRCA) technique by employing a zigzag fan-shaped centric ky-kz k-space trajectory combined with high-resolution deep learning reconstruction (HR-DLR).

All imaging data were acquired from 12 healthy subjects and 2 patients using two clinical 3-T MR imagers, with institutional review board approval. Ten healthy subjects underwent both standard 3D fast gradient echo (sFGE) and centric ky-kz k-space trajectory FGE (cFGE) acquisitions to compare the scan time and image quality. Quantitative measures were also performed for signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as well as sharpness of the vessel. Furthermore, the feasibility of the proposed cFGE sequence was assessed in two patients. For assessing the feasibility of the centric ky-kz trajectory, the navigator-echo window of a 30-mm threshold was applied in cFGE, whereas sFGE was applied using a standard 5-mm threshold. Image quality of MRCA using cFGE with HR-DLR and sFGE without HR-DLR was scored in a 5-point scale (non-diagnostic = 1, fair = 2, moderate = 3, good = 4, and excellent = 5). Image evaluation of cFGE, applying HR-DLR, was compared with sFGE without HR-DLR. Friedman test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or paired t tests were performed for the comparison of related variables.

The actual MRCA scan time of cFGE with a 30-mm threshold was acquired in less than 5 min, achieving nearly 100% efficiency, showcasing its expeditious and robustness. In contrast, sFGE was acquired with a 5-mm threshold and had an average scan time of approximately 15 min. Overall image quality for MRCA was scored 3.3 for sFGE and 2.7 for cFGE without HR-DLR but increased to 3.6 for cFGE with HR-DLR and (p < 0.05). The clinical result of patients obtained within 5 min showed good quality images in both patients, even with a stent, without artifacts. Quantitative measures of SNR, CNR, and sharpness of vessel presented higher in cFGE with HR-DLR.

Our findings demonstrate a robust, time-efficient solution for high-quality MRCA, enhancing patient comfort and increasing clinical throughput.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides detailed structural information of the internal body organs and soft tissue regions of a patient in clinical diagnosis for disease detection, localization, and progress monitoring. MRI scanner hardware manufacturers incorporate various post-acquisition image-processing techniques into the scanner's computer software tools for different post-processing tasks. These tools provide a final image of adequate quality and essential features for accurate clinical reporting and predictive interpretation for better treatment planning. Different post-acquisition image-processing tasks for MRI quality enhancement include noise removal, motion artifact reduction, magnetic bias field correction, and eddy electric current effect removal. Recently, deep learning (DL) methods have shown great success in many research fields, including image and video applications. DL-based data-driven feature-learning approaches have great potential for MR image denoising and image-quality-degrading artifact correction. Recent studies have demonstrated significant improvements in image-analysis tasks using DL-based convolutional neural network techniques. The promising capabilities and performance of DL techniques in various problem-solving domains have motivated researchers to adapt DL methods to medical image analysis and quality enhancement tasks. This paper presents a comprehensive review of DL-based state-of-the-art MRI quality enhancement and artifact removal methods for regenerating high-quality images while preserving essential anatomical and physiological feature maps without destroying important image information. Existing research gaps and future directions have also been provided by highlighting potential research areas for future developments, along with their importance and advantages in medical imaging.

To perform image quality comparison between deep learning-based multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (DL-mb-DWI), accelerated multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (accelerated mb-DWI), and conventional multiband diffusion-weighted sequence (conventional mb-DWI) in patients undergoing clinical liver magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Fifty consecutive patients who underwent clinical MRI of the liver at a 1.5-T scanner, between September 1, 2021, and January 31, 2022, were included in this study. Three radiologists independently reviewed images using a 5-point Likert scale for artifacts and image quality factors, in addition to assessing the presence of liver lesions and lesion conspicuity.

DL-mb-DWI acquisition time was 65.0 ± 2.4 seconds, significantly ( P < 0.001) shorter than conventional mb-DWI (147.5 ± 19.2 seconds) and accelerated mb-DWI (94.3 ± 1.8 seconds). DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores than conventional mb-DWI for conspicuity of the left lobe ( P < 0.001), sharpness of intrahepatic vessel margin ( P < 0.001), sharpness of the pancreatic contour ( P < 0.001), in-plane motion artifact ( P = 0.002), and overall image quality ( P = 0.005) by reader 2. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for conspicuity of the left lobe ( P = 0.006), sharpness of the pancreatic contour ( P = 0.020), and in-plane motion artifact ( P = 0.042) by reader 3. DL-mb-DWI received significantly higher scores for strength of fat suppression ( P = 0.004) and sharpness of the pancreatic contour ( P = 0.038) by reader 1. The remaining quality parameters did not reach statistical significance for reader 1.

Novel diffusion-weighted MRI sequence with deep learning-based image reconstruction demonstrated significantly decreased acquisition times compared with conventional and accelerated mb-DWI sequences, while maintaining or improving image quality for routine abdominal MRI. DL-mb-DWI offers a potential alternative to conventional mb-DWI in routine clinical liver MRI.

Deep neural networks (DNNs) for MRI reconstruction often require large datasets for training. Still, in clinical settings, the domains of datasets are diverse, and how robust DNNs are to domain differences between training and testing datasets has been an open question. Here, we numerically and clinically evaluate the generalization of the reconstruction networks across various domains under clinically practical conditions and provide practical guidance on what points to consider when selecting models for clinical application.

We compare the reconstruction performance between four network models: U-Net, the deep cascade of convolutional neural networks (DC-CNNs), Hybrid Cascade, and variational network (VarNet). We used the public multicoil dataset fastMRI for training and testing and performed a single-domain test, where the domains of the dataset used for training and testing were the same, and cross-domain tests, where the source and target domains were different. We conducted a single-domain test (Experiment 1) and cross-domain tests (Experiments 2-4), focusing on six factors (the number of images, sampling pattern, acceleration factor, noise level, contrast, and anatomical structure) both numerically and clinically.

U-Net had lower performance than the three model-based networks and was less robust to domain shifts between training and testing datasets. VarNet had the highest performance and robustness among the three model-based networks, followed by Hybrid Cascade and DC-CNN. Especially, VarNet showed high performance even with a limited number of training images (200 images/10 cases). U-Net was more robust to domain shifts concerning noise level than the other model-based networks. Hybrid Cascade showed slightly better performance and robustness than DC-CNN, except for robustness to noise-level domain shifts. The results of the clinical evaluations generally agreed with the results of the quantitative metrics.

In this study, we numerically and clinically evaluated the robustness of the publicly available networks using the multicoil data. Therefore, this study provided practical guidance for clinical applications.

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI).

This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test.

BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05).

The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

The aim of this study was to investigate whether super-resolution deep learning reconstruction (SR-DLR) is superior to conventional deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with respect to interobserver agreement in the evaluation of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI. This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent 1.5T cervical spine MRI. T2-weighted sagittal images were reconstructed with SR-DLR and DLR. Three blinded radiologists independently evaluated the images in terms of the degree of neuroforaminal stenosis, depictions of the vertebrae, spinal cord and neural foramina, sharpness, noise, artefacts and diagnostic acceptability. In quantitative image analyses, a fourth radiologist evaluated the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by placing a circular or ovoid region of interest on the spinal cord, and the edge slope based on a linear region of interest placed across the surface of the spinal cord. Interobserver agreement in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis using SR-DLR and DLR was 0.422-0.571 and 0.410-0.542, respectively. The kappa values between reader 1 vs. reader 2 and reader 2 vs. reader 3 significantly differed. Two of the three readers rated depictions of the spinal cord, sharpness, and diagnostic acceptability as significantly better with SR-DLR than with DLR. Both SNR and edge slope (/mm) were also significantly better with SR-DLR (12.9 and 6031, respectively) than with DLR (11.5 and 3741, respectively) (p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, compared to DLR, SR-DLR improved interobserver agreement in the evaluations of neuroforaminal stenosis using 1.5T cervical spine MRI.

To investigate the feasibility of a deep learning-constrained compressed sensing (DL-CS) method in non-contrast-enhanced modified DIXON (mDIXON) coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and compare its diagnostic accuracy using coronary CT angiography (CCTA) as a reference standard.

Ninety-nine participants were prospectively recruited for this study. Thirty healthy subjects (age range: 20-65 years; 50% female) underwent three non-contrast mDIXON-based coronary MRA sequences including DL-CS, CS, and conventional sequences. The three groups were compared based on the scan time, subjective image quality score, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The remaining 69 patients suspected of coronary artery disease (CAD) (age range: 39-83 years; 51% female) underwent the DL-CS coronary MRA and its diagnostic performance was compared with that of CCTA.

The scan time for the DL-CS and CS sequences was notably shorter than that of the conventional sequence (9.6 ± 3.1 min vs 10.0 ± 3.4 min vs 13.0 ± 4.9 min; p < 0.001). The DL-CS sequence obtained the highest image quality score, mean SNR, and CNR compared to CS and conventional methods (all p < 0.001). Compared to CCTA, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of DL-CS mDIXON coronary MRA per patient were 84.1%, 92.0%, and 79.5%; those per vessel were 90.3%, 82.6%, and 92.5%; and those per segment were 98.0%, 85.1%, and 98.0%, respectively.

The DL-CS mDIXON coronary MRA provided superior image quality and short scan time for visualizing coronary arteries in healthy individuals and demonstrated high diagnostic value compared to CCTA in CAD patients.

DL-CS resulted in improved image quality with an acceptable scan time, and demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance compared to CCTA, which could be an alternative to enhance the workflow of coronary MRA.

Current coronary MRA techniques are limited by scan time and the need for noise reduction. DL-CS reduced the scan time in coronary MR angiography. Deep learning achieved the highest image quality among the three methods. Deep learning-based coronary MR angiography demonstrated high performance compared to CT angiography.

We aimed to determine the capabilities of compressed sensing (CS) and deep learning reconstruction (DLR) with those of conventional parallel imaging (PI) for improving image quality while reducing examination time on female pelvic 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Fifty-two consecutive female patients with various pelvic diseases underwent MRI with T1- and T2-weighted sequences using CS and PI. All CS data was reconstructed with and without DLR. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of muscle and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between fat tissue and iliac muscle on T1-weighted images (T1WI) and between myometrium and straight muscle on T2-weighted images (T2WI) were determined through region-of-interest measurements. Overall image quality (OIQ) and diagnostic confidence level (DCL) were evaluated on 5-point scales. SNRs and CNRs were compared using Tukey's test, and qualitative indexes using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

SNRs of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than those using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.010). CNRs of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than those using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.003). OIQ of T1WI and T2WI obtained using CS with DLR were higher than that using CS without DLR or conventional PI (p < 0.001). DCL of T2WI obtained using CS with DLR was higher than that using conventional PI or CS without DLR (p < 0.001).

CS with DLR provided better image quality and shorter examination time than those obtainable with PI for female pelvic 1.5-T MRI.

CS with DLR can be considered effective for attaining better image quality and shorter examination time for female pelvic MRI at 1.5 T compared with those obtainable with PI.

Patients underwent MRI with T1- and T2-weighted sequences using CS and PI. All CS data was reconstructed with and without DLR. CS with DLR allowed for examination times significantly shorter than those of PI and provided significantly higher signal- and CNRs, as well as OIQ.

This study aims to assess the effectiveness of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which leverages k-space data, on the image quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) bone imaging using a 3D multi-echo in-phase sequence.

In this retrospective study, 29 patients who underwent lumbar spine MRI, including an MR bone imaging sequence between January and April 2023, were analyzed. Images were reconstructed with and without SR-DLR (Matrix sizes: 960 × 960 and 320 × 320, respectively). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the vertebral body and spinal canal and the contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the vertebral body and spinal canal were quantitatively evaluated. Furthermore, the slope at half-peak points of the profile curve drawn across the posterior border of the vertebral body was calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality of both image types using a 4-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients, and quantitative and qualitative scores were compared via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

SNRs of the vertebral body and spinal canal were notably improved in images with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Contrast and CNR were significantly enhanced with SR-DLR compared to those without SR-DLR (p = 0.023 and p = 0.022, respectively). The slope of the profile curve at half-peak points across the posterior border of the vertebral body and spinal canal was markedly higher with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Qualitative scores (noise: p < 0.001, contrast: p < 0.001, artifact p = 0.042, sharpness: p < 0.001, overall image quality: p < 0.001) were superior in images with SR-DLR compared to those without. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement (noise: κ = 0.56, contrast: κ = 0.51, artifact: κ = 0.46, sharpness: κ = 0.76, overall image quality: κ = 0.44).

SR-DLR, which is based on k-space data, has the potential to enhance the image quality of lumbar spine MR bone imaging utilizing a 3D gradient echo in-phase sequence.

The application of SR-DLR can lead to improvements in lumbar spine MR bone imaging quality.

The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the combined use of 3D wheel sampling and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for intracranial high-resolution (HR)-time-of-flight (TOF)-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T.

This prospective study enrolled 20 patients who underwent head MRI at 3 T, including TOF-MRA. We used 3D wheel sampling called "fast 3D" and DLR for HR-TOF-MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.59 × 0.5 mm 3 ) in addition to conventional MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.89 × 1 mm 3 ). We compared contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio between the blood vessels (basilar artery and anterior cerebral artery) and brain parenchyma, full width at half maximum in the P3 segment of the posterior cerebral artery among 3 protocols. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated noise, contrast, sharpness, artifact, and overall image quality of 3 protocols.

The contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio of fast 3D-HR-MRA with DLR are comparable or higher than those of conventional MRA and fast 3D-HR-MRA without DLR. The full width at half maximum was significantly lower in fast 3D-MRA with and without DLR than in conventional MRA ( P = 0.006, P < 0.001). In qualitative evaluation, fast 3D-MRA with DLR had significantly higher sharpness and overall image quality than conventional MRA and fast 3D-MRA without DLR (sharpness: P = 0.021, P = 0.001; overall image quality: P = 0.029, P < 0.001).

The combination of 3D wheel sampling and DLR can improve visualization of arteries in intracranial TOF-MRA.

Simulations of physical processes and behavior can provide unique insights and understanding of real-world problems. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an imaging technique with several components of complexity. Several of these components have been characterized and simulated in the past. However, several computational challenges prevent simulations from being simultaneously fast, flexible, and accurate.

The simulation of MRI experiments is underutilized by medical physicists and researchers using currently available simulators due to reasons including speed, accuracy, and extensibility constraints. This paper introduces an innovative MRI simulation engine and framework that aims to overcome these issues making available realistic and fast MRI simulation.

Using the CUDA C/C++ programing language, an MRI simulation engine (PhoenixMR), incorporating a Turing-complete virtual machine (VM) to simulate abstract spatiotemporal complexities, was developed. This engine solves a set of time-discrete Bloch equations using the symmetric operator splitting technique. An extensible front-end framework package (written in Python) aids the use of PhoenixMR to simplify simulation development.

The PhoenixMR library and front-end codes have been developed and tested. A set of example simulations were performed to demonstrate the ease of use and flexibility of simulation components such as geometrical setup, pulse sequence design, phantom design, and so forth. Initial validation of PhoenixMR is performed by comparing its accuracy and performance against a widely used MRI simulator using identical simulation parameters. Validation results show PhoenixMR simulations are three orders of magnitude faster. There is also strong agreement between models.

A novel MRI simulation platform called PhoenixMR has been introduced. This research tool is designed to be usable by physicists and engineers interested in performing MRI simulations. Examples are shown demonstrating the accuracy, flexibility, and usability of PhoenixMR in several key areas of MRI simulation.

This study aimed to evaluate whether the image quality of 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate is equal to or higher than that of 3 T MRI by applying deep learning reconstruction (DLR). To objectively analyze the images from the 13 healthy volunteers, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images obtained by the 1.5 T scanner with and without DLR, as well as for images obtained by the 3 T scanner. In the subjective, T2W images of the prostate were visually evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The SNRs and CNRs in 1.5 T images with DLR were higher than that in 3 T images. Subjective image scores were better for 1.5 T images with DLR than 3 T images. The use of the DLR technique in 1.5 T MRI substantially improved the SNR and image quality of T2W images of the prostate gland, as compared to 3 T MRI.

Axillary lymph node (ALN) status is a crucial prognostic indicator for breast cancer metastasis, with manual interpretation of whole slide images (WSIs) being the current standard practice. However, this method is subjective and time-consuming. Recent advancements in deep learning-based methods for medical image analysis have shown promise in improving clinical diagnosis. This study aims to leverage these technological advancements to develop a deep learning model based on features extracted from primary tumor biopsies for preoperatively identifying ALN metastasis in early-stage breast cancer patients with negative nodes.

We present DLCNBC-SA, a deep learning-based network specifically tailored for core needle biopsy and clinical data feature extraction, which integrates a self-attention mechanism (CNBC-SA). The proposed model consists of a feature extractor based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and an improved self-attention mechanism module, which can preserve the independence of features in WSIs for analysis and enhancement to provide rich feature representation. To validate the performance of the proposed model, we conducted comparative experiments and ablation studies using publicly available datasets, and verification was performed through quantitative analysis.

The comparative experiment illustrates the superior performance of the proposed model in the task of binary classification of ALNs, as compared to alternative methods. Our method achieved outstanding performance [area under the curve (AUC): 0.882] in this task, significantly surpassing the state-of-the-art (SOTA) method on the same dataset (AUC: 0.862). The ablation experiment reveals that incorporating RandomRotation data augmentation technology and utilizing Adadelta optimizer can effectively enhance the performance of the proposed model.

The experimental results demonstrate that the model proposed in this paper outperforms the SOTA model on the same dataset, thereby establishing its reliability as an assistant for pathologists in analyzing WSIs of breast cancer. Consequently, it significantly enhances both the efficiency and accuracy of doctors during the diagnostic process.

Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) bSSFP imaging enables stress myocardial perfusion imaging with high spatial resolution and increased spatial coverage. Standard parallel imaging techniques (e.g., TGRAPPA) can be used for image reconstruction but result in high noise level. Alternatively, iterative reconstruction techniques based on temporal regularization (ITER) improve image quality but are associated with reduced temporal signal fidelity and long computation time limiting their online use. The aim is to develop an image reconstruction technique for SMS-bSSFP myocardial perfusion imaging combining parallel imaging and image-based denoising using a novel noise map estimation network (NoiseMapNet), which preserves both sharpness and temporal signal profiles and that has low computational cost.

The proposed reconstruction of SMS images consists of a standard temporal parallel imaging reconstruction (TGRAPPA) with motion correction (MOCO) followed by image denoising using NoiseMapNet. NoiseMapNet is a deep learning network based on a 2D Unet architecture and aims to predict a noise map from an input noisy image, which is then subtracted from the noisy image to generate the denoised image. This approach was evaluated in 17 patients who underwent stress perfusion imaging using a SMS-bSSFP sequence. Images were reconstructed with (a) TGRAPPA with MOCO (thereafter referred to as TGRAPPA), (b) iterative reconstruction with integrated motion compensation (ITER), and (c) proposed NoiseMapNet-based reconstruction. Normalized mean squared error (NMSE) with respect to TGRAPPA, myocardial sharpness, image quality, perceived SNR (pSNR), and number of diagnostic segments were evaluated.

NMSE of NoiseMapNet was lower than using ITER for both myocardium (0.045 ± 0.021 vs. 0.172 ± 0.041, p < 0.001) and left ventricular blood pool (0.025 ± 0.014 vs. 0.069 ± 0.020, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between all methods for myocardial sharpness (p = 0.77) and number of diagnostic segments (p = 0.36). ITER led to higher image quality than NoiseMapNet/TGRAPPA (2.7 ± 0.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.4/1.3 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) and higher pSNR than NoiseMapNet/TGRAPPA (3.0 ± 0.0 vs. 2.0 ± 0.0/1.3 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). Importantly, NoiseMapNet yielded higher pSNR (p < 0.001) and image quality (p < 0.008) than TGRAPPA. Computation time of NoiseMapNet was only 20s for one entire dataset.

NoiseMapNet-based reconstruction enables fast SMS image reconstruction for stress myocardial perfusion imaging while preserving sharpness and temporal signal profiles.

Despite its superior soft tissue contrast and non-invasive nature, MRI requires long scan times due to its intrinsic signal acquisition principles, a main drawback which technological advancements in MRI have been focused on. In particular, scan time reduction is a natural requirement in neuroimaging due to detailed structures requiring high resolution imaging and often volumetric (3D) acquisitions, and numerous studies have recently attempted to harness deep learning (DL) technology in enabling scan time reduction and image quality improvement. Various DL-based image reconstruction products allow for additional scan time reduction on top of existing accelerated acquisition methods without compromising the image quality.

We aimed to evaluate the effect of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo (HR-3D T2-FASE) imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors.

This study included 13 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative HR-3D T2-FASE imaging using a 3 T MRI scanner. The reconstruction voxel size of HR-3D T2-FASE imaging was 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the structures were compared between HR-3D T2-FASE images with and without DLR. The observers' preferences based on four categories on the tumor side on HR-3D T2-FASE images were evaluated. The facial nerve in relation to the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images was assessed with reference to intraoperative findings.

The mean CNR between the tumor and trigeminal nerve and between the cerebrospinal fluid and trigeminal nerve was significantly higher for DLR images than non-DLR-based images (14.3 ± 8.9 vs. 12.0 ± 7.6, and 66.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.9 ± 8.5, P < 0.001, respectively). The observer's preference for the depiction and delineation of the tumor, cranial nerves, vessels, and location relation on DLR HR-3D T2FASE images was superior to that on non-DLR HR-3D T2FASE images in 7 (54%), 6 (46%), 6 (46%), and 6 (46%) of 13 cases, respectively. The facial nerves around the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images were visualized accurately in five (38%) cases with DLR and in four (31%) without DLR.

DLR HR-3D T2-FASE imaging is useful for the preoperative assessment of CPA tumors.

The purpose of this study is to improve the qualitative and quantitative image quality of the time-resolved angiography with interleaved stochastic trajectories technique (4D-TWIST-MRA) using deep neural network (DNN)-based MR image reconstruction software.

A total of 520 consecutive patients underwent 4D-TWIST-MRA for ischemic stroke or intracranial vessel stenosis evaluation. Four-dimensional DNN-reconstructed MRA (4D-DNR) was generated using commercially available software (SwiftMR v.3.0.0.0, AIRS Medical, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Among those evaluated, 397 (76.3%) patients received concurrent time-of-flight MRA (TOF-MRA) to compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), image quality, noise, sharpness, vascular conspicuity, and degree of venous contamination with a 5-point Likert scale. Two radiologists independently evaluated the detection rate of intracranial aneurysm in TOF-MRA, 4D-TWIST-MRA, and 4D-DNR in separate sessions. The other 123 (23.7%) patients received 4D-TWIST-MRA due to a suspicion of acute ischemic stroke. The confidence level and decision time for large vessel occlusion were evaluated in these patients.

In qualitative analysis, 4D-DNR demonstrated better overall image quality, sharpness, vascular conspicuity, and noise reduction compared to 4D-TWIST-MRA. Moreover, 4D-DNR exhibited a higher SNR than 4D-TWIST-MRA. The venous contamination and aneurysm detection rates were not significantly different between the two MRA images. When compared to TOF-MRA, 4D-CE-MRA underestimated the aneurysm size (2.66 ± 0.51 vs. 1.75 ± 0.62, p = 0.029); however, 4D-DNR showed no significant difference in size compared to TOF-MRA (2.66 ± 0.51 vs. 2.10 ± 0.41, p = 0.327). In the diagnosis of large vessel occlusion, 4D-DNR showed a better confidence level and shorter decision time than 4D-TWIST-MRA.

DNN reconstruction may improve the qualitative and quantitative image quality of 4D-TWIST-MRA, and also enhance diagnostic performance for intracranial aneurysm and large vessel occlusion.

To evaluate whether deep learning reconstruction (DLR) can accelerate the acquisition of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences of the knee for clinical use.

Using a 1.5-T MRI scanner, sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted imaging (fs-T2WI), coronal proton density-weighted imaging (PDWI), and coronal T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) were performed. DLR was applied to images with a number of signal averages (NSA) of 1 to obtain 1DLR images. Then 1NSA, 1DLR, and 4NSA images were compared subjectively, and by noise (standard deviation of intra-articular water or medial meniscus) and contrast-to-noise ratio between two anatomical structures or between an anatomical structure and intra-articular water.

Twenty-seven healthy volunteers (age: 40.6 ± 11.9 years) were enrolled. Three 1DLR image sequences were obtained within 200 s (approximately 12 minutes for 4NSA image). According to objective evaluations, PDWI 1DLR images showed the smallest noise and significantly higher contrast than 1NSA and 4NSA images. For fs-T2WI, smaller noise and higher contrast were observed in the order of 4NSA, 1DLR, and 1NSA images. According to the subjective analysis, structure visibility, image noise, and overall image quality were significantly better for PDWI 1DLR than 1NSA images; moreover, the visibility of the meniscus and bone, image noise, and overall image quality were significantly better for 1DLR than 4NSA images. Fs-T2WI and T1WI 1DLR images showed no difference between 1DLR and 4NSA images.

Compared to PDWI 4NSA images, PDWI 1DLR images were of higher quality, while the quality of fs-T2WI and T1WI 1DLR images was similar to that of 4NSA images.

To evaluate the diagnostic value of T1-weighted 3D fast spin-echo sequence (CUBE) with deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions on contrast-enhanced MRI.

We evaluated 24 patients with pituitary adenoma or residual tumor using CUBE with and without DLR, 1-mm slice thickness 2D T1WI (1-mm 2D T1WI) with DLR, and 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR) as contrast-enhanced MRI. Depiction scores of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions were assigned by two neuroradiologists, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated.

CUBE with DLR showed significantly higher scores for depicting pituitary adenoma or residual tumor compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR, and SPGR (p < 0.01). The depiction score for delineation of the boundary between adenoma and the cavernous sinus was higher for CUBE with DLR than for 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR (p = 0.01), but the difference was not significant when compared to SPGR (p = 0.20). CUBE with DLR had better interobserver agreement for evaluating adenomas than 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR (Kappa values, 0.75 vs. 0.41). The CNR of the adenoma to the brain parenchyma increased to a ratio of 3.6 (obtained by dividing 13.7, CNR of CUBE with DLR, by 3.8, that without DLR, p < 0.01). CUBE with DLR had a significantly higher CNR than SPGR, but not 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR.

On the contrast-enhanced MRI, compared to CUBE without DLR, 1-mm 2D T1WI with DLR and SPGR, CUBE with DLR improves the depiction of pituitary adenoma and parasellar regions.

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technologies are the latest methods attempting to solve the enduring problem of reducing MRI acquisition times without compromising image quality. The clinical utility of this reconstruction technique is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess whether a commercially available DLR technique applied to 2D T2-weighted FLAIR brain images allows a reduction in scan time, without compromising image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy.

47 participants (24 male, mean age 55.9 ± 18.7 SD years, range 20-89 years) underwent routine, clinically indicated brain MRI studies in March 2022, that included a standard-of-care (SOC) T2-weighted FLAIR sequence, and an accelerated acquisition that was reconstructed using the DLR denoising product. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefacts for each sequence, and preferred sequence on direct comparison, were subjectively assessed by two readers.

There was a strong preference for SOC FLAIR sequence for overall image quality (P = 0.01) and head-to-head comparison (P < 0.001). No difference was observed for lesion conspicuity (P = 0.49), perceived SNR (P = 1.0), and perceived CNR (P = 0.84). There was no difference in motion (P = 0.57) nor Gibbs ringing (P = 0.86) artefacts. Phase ghosting (P = 0.038) and pseudolesions were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) on DLR images.

DLR algorithm allowed faster FLAIR acquisition times with comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity. However, an increased incidence and severity of phase ghosting artefact and presence of pseudolesions using this technique may result in a reduction in reading speed, efficiency, and diagnostic confidence.

This study was conducted to evaluate whether thin-slice 2D fat-saturated proton density-weighted images of the shoulder joint in three imaging planes combined with parallel imaging, partial Fourier technique, and denoising approach with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) are more useful than 3D fat-saturated proton density multi-planar voxel images.

Eighteen patients who underwent MRI of the shoulder joint at 3T were enrolled. The denoising effect of dDLR in 2D was evaluated using coefficient of variation (CV). Qualitative evaluation of anatomical structures, noise, and artifacts in 2D after dDLR and 3D was performed by two radiologists using a five-point Likert scale. All were analyzed statistically. Gwet's agreement coefficients were also calculated.

The CV of 2D after dDLR was significantly lower than that before dDLR (P < 0.05). Both radiologists rated 2D higher than 3D for all anatomical structures and noise (P < 0.05), except for artifacts. Both Gwet's agreement coefficients of anatomical structures, noise, and artifacts in 2D and 3D produced nearly perfect agreement between the two radiologists. The evaluation of 2D tended to be more reproducible than 3D.

2D with parallel imaging, partial Fourier technique, and dDLR was proved to be superior to 3D for depicting shoulder joint structures with lower noise.

The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of compressed sensing (CS) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for improving spatial resolution, image quality and focal liver lesion detection on high-resolution contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (HR-CE-T1WI) obtained by CS with DLR as compared with conventional CE-T1WI with parallel imaging (PI).

Seventy-seven participants with focal liver lesions underwent conventional CE-T1WI with PI and HR-CE-T1WI, surgical resection, transarterial chemoembolization, and radiofrequency ablation, followed by histopathological or >2-year follow-up examinations in our hospital. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of liver, spleen and kidney were calculated for each patient, after which each SNR was compared by means of paired t-test. To compare focal lesion detection capabilities of the two methods, a 5-point visual scoring system was adopted for a per lesion basis analysis. Jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis was then performed, while sensitivity and false positive rates (/data set) for consensus assessment of the two methods were also compared by using McNemar's test or the signed rank test.

Each SNR of HR-CE-T1WI was significantly higher than that of conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p < 0.05). Sensitivities for consensus assessment showed that HR-CE-MRI had significantly higher sensitivity than conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p = 0.004). Moreover, there were significantly fewer FP/cases for HR-CE-T1WI than for conventional CE-T1WI with PI (p = 0.04).

CS with DLR are useful for improving spatial resolution, image quality and focal liver lesion detection capability of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced 3D T1WI without any need for longer breath-holding time.

To investigate the feasibility of obtaining black-blood imaging with a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch at 3 T using a newly modified Relaxation-Enhanced Angiography without Contrast and Triggering for Black-Blood Imaging (REACT-BB).

REACT-BB provides black-blood images by adjusting the inversion time (TI) in REACT to the null point of blood. The optimal TI for REACT-BB was investigated in 10 healthy volunteers with TI varied from 200 ms to 1400 ms. Contrast ratios were calculated between muscle and three branch arteries of the aortic arch. Additionally, a comparison between REACT-BB and MPRAGE involved evaluating the depiction of high-intensity plaques in 222 patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack. Measurements included plaque-to-muscle signal intensity ratios (PMR), plaque volumes, and carotid artery stenosis rates in 60 patients with high-intensity plaques in carotid arteries.

REACT-BB with TI = 850 ms produced the black-blood image with the best contrast between blood and background tissues. REACT-BB outperformed MPRAGE in depicting high-intensity plaques in the aortic arch (55.4% vs 45.5%) and exhibited superior overall image quality in visual assessment (3.31 ± 0.70 vs 2.89 ± 0.73; p < 0.05). Although the PMR of REACT-BB was significantly lower than MPRAGE (2.227 ± 0.601 vs 2.285 ± 0.662; P < 0.05), a strong positive correlation existed between REACT-BB and MPRAGE (ρ = 0.935; P < 0.05), and all high-intensity plaques that MPRAGE detected were clearly detected by REACT-BB.

REACT-BB provides black-blood images with uniformly suppressed fat and blood signals over a large FOV from the neck to the aortic arch with comparable or better high-signal plaque depiction than MPRAGE.

Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) obtained by echo-planar imaging (EPI) are frequently degraded by susceptibility artifacts. It has been suggested that DWI obtained by fast advanced spin-echo (FASE) or reconstructed with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) could be useful for image quality improvements. The purpose of this investigation using in vitro and in vivo studies was to determine the influence of sequence difference and of DLR for DWI on image quality, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) evaluation, and differentiation of malignant from benign head and neck tumors.

For the in vitro study, a DWI phantom was scanned by FASE and EPI sequences and reconstructed with and without DLR. Each ADC within the phantom for each DWI was then assessed and correlated for each measured ADC and standard value by Spearman's rank correlation analysis. For the in vivo study, DWIs obtained by EPI and FASE sequences were also obtained for head and neck tumor patients. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ADC were then determined based on ROI measurements, while SNR of tumors and ADC were compared between all DWI data sets by means of Tukey's Honest Significant Difference test.

For the in vitro study, all correlations between measured ADC and standard reference were significant and excellent (0.92 ≤ ρ ≤ 0.99, p < 0.0001). For the in vivo study, the SNR of FASE with DLR was significantly higher than that of FASE without DLR (p = 0.02), while ADC values for benign and malignant tumors showed significant differences between each sequence with and without DLR (p < 0.05).

In comparison with EPI sequence, FASE sequence and DLR can improve image quality and distortion of DWIs without significantly influencing ADC measurements or differentiation capability of malignant from benign head and neck tumors.