To test equivalency of deep-learning 3D lumbar spine MRI with "CT-like" contrast to CT for virtual pedicle screw planning and geometric measurements in robotic-navigated spinal surgery.

Between December 2021 and June 2022, 16 patients referred for spinal fusion and decompression surgery with pre-operative CT and 3D MRI were retrospectively assessed. Pedicle screws were virtually placed on lumbar (L1-L5) and sacral (S1) vertebrae by three spine surgeons, and metrics (lateral deviation, axial/sagittal angles) were collected. Vertebral body length/width (VL/VW) and pedicle height/width (PH/PW) were measured at L1-L5 by three radiologists. Analysis included equivalency testing using the 95% confidence interval (CI), a margin of ± 1 mm (± 2.08° for angles), and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs).

Across all vertebral levels, both combined and separately, equivalency between CT and MRI was proven for all pedicle screw metrics and geometric measurements, except for VL at L1 (mean difference: - 0.64 mm; [95%CI - 1.05, - 0.24]), L2 (- 0.65 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.20]), and L4 (- 0.78 mm; [95%CI - 1.11, - 0.46]). Inter- and intra-rater ICC for screw metrics across all vertebral levels combined ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 and 0.89-0.98 for CT, and from 0.62 to 0.92 and 0.81-0.97 for MRI, respectively. Inter- and intra-rater ICC for geometric measurements ranged from 0.60 to 0.95 and 0.84-0.97 for CT, and 0.61-0.95 and 0.93-0.98 for MRI, respectively.

Deep-learning 3D MRI facilitates equivalent virtual pedicle screw placements and geometric assessments for most lumbar vertebrae, with the exception of vertebral body length at L1, L2, and L4, compared to CT for pre-operative planning in patients considered for robotic-navigated spine surgery.

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI).

This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test.

BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05).

The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

To assess image quality and diagnostic confidence of 3D T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) MRI using artificial intelligence (AI) reconstruction.

This prospective, IRB-approved study enrolled 50 pediatric patients (mean age = 11.8 ± 3.1 years) undergoing clinical brain MRI. In addition to standard of care (SOC) compressed SENSE (CS = 2.5), 3D T1-weighted SPGR images were obtained with higher CS acceleration factors (5 and 8) to evaluate the ability of AI reconstruction to improve image quality and reduce scan time. Images were reviewed independently on dedicated research PACS workstations by two neuroradiologists. Quantitative analysis of signal intensities to calculate apparent grey and white matter signal to noise (aSNR) and grey-white matter apparent contrast to noise ratios (aCNR) was performed.

AI improved overall image quality compared to standard CS reconstruction in 35% (35/100) of evaluations in CS = 2.5 (average scan time = 221 ± 6.9 s), 100% (46/46) of CS = 5 (average scan time = 113.3 ± 4.6 s) and 94% (47/50) of CS = 8 (average scan time = 74.1 ± 0.01 s). Quantitative analysis revealed significantly higher grey matter aSNR, white matter aSNR and grey-white matter aCNR with AI reconstruction compared to standard reconstruction for CS 5 and 8 (all p-values < 0.001), however not for CS 2.5.

AI reconstruction improved overall image quality and gray-white matter qualitative and quantitative aSNR and aCNR in highly accelerated (CS = 5 and 8) 3D T1W SPGR images in the majority of pediatric patients.

Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) technologies are the latest methods attempting to solve the enduring problem of reducing MRI acquisition times without compromising image quality. The clinical utility of this reconstruction technique is yet to be fully established. This study aims to assess whether a commercially available DLR technique applied to 2D T2-weighted FLAIR brain images allows a reduction in scan time, without compromising image quality and thus diagnostic accuracy.

47 participants (24 male, mean age 55.9 ± 18.7 SD years, range 20-89 years) underwent routine, clinically indicated brain MRI studies in March 2022, that included a standard-of-care (SOC) T2-weighted FLAIR sequence, and an accelerated acquisition that was reconstructed using the DLR denoising product. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and artefacts for each sequence, and preferred sequence on direct comparison, were subjectively assessed by two readers.

There was a strong preference for SOC FLAIR sequence for overall image quality (P = 0.01) and head-to-head comparison (P < 0.001). No difference was observed for lesion conspicuity (P = 0.49), perceived SNR (P = 1.0), and perceived CNR (P = 0.84). There was no difference in motion (P = 0.57) nor Gibbs ringing (P = 0.86) artefacts. Phase ghosting (P = 0.038) and pseudolesions were significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) on DLR images.

DLR algorithm allowed faster FLAIR acquisition times with comparable image quality and lesion conspicuity. However, an increased incidence and severity of phase ghosting artefact and presence of pseudolesions using this technique may result in a reduction in reading speed, efficiency, and diagnostic confidence.

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of ultrafast (2 min) cervical spine MRI protocol using a deep learning-assisted 3D iterative image enhancement (DL-3DIIE) system, compared to a conventional MRI protocol (6 min 14s).

Fifty-one patients were recruited and underwent cervical spine MRI using conventional and ultrafast protocols. A DL-3DIIE system was applied to the ultrafast protocol to compensate for the spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of images. Two radiologists independently assessed and graded the quality of images from the dimensions of artifacts, boundary sharpness, visibility of lesions and overall image quality. We recorded the presence or absence of different pathologies. Moreover, we examined the interchangeability of the two protocols by computing the 95% confidence interval of the individual equivalence index, and also evaluated the inter-protocol intra-observer agreement using Cohen's weighted kappa.

Ultrafast-DL-3DIIE images were significantly better than conventional ones for artifacts and equivalent for other qualitative features. The number of cases with different kinds of pathologies was indistinguishable based on the MR images from ultrafast-DL-3DIIE and conventional protocols. With the exception of disc degeneration, the 95% confidence interval for the individual equivalence index across all variables did not surpass 5%, suggesting that the two protocols are interchangeable. The kappa values of these evaluations by the two radiologists ranged from 0.65 to 0.88, indicating good-to-excellent agreement.

The DL-3DIIE system enables 67% spine MRI scan time reduction while obtaining at least equivalent image quality and diagnostic results compared to the conventional protocol, suggesting its potential for clinical utility.

It has been reported that deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) can reduce image noise and artifacts, thereby improving the signal-to-noise ratio and image sharpness. However, no previous studies have evaluated the efficacy of DLR in improving image quality in reduced-field-of-view (reduced-FOV) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) [field-of-view optimized and constrained undistorted single-shot (FOCUS)] of the pancreas. We hypothesized that a combination of these techniques would improve DWI image quality without prolonging the scan time but would influence the apparent diffusion coefficient calculation.

To evaluate the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement of FOCUS of the pancreas.

This was a retrospective study evaluated 37 patients with pancreatic cystic lesions who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between August 2021 and October 2021. We evaluated three types of FOCUS examinations: FOCUS with DLR (FOCUS-DLR+), FOCUS without DLR (FOCUS-DLR-), and conventional FOCUS (FOCUS-conv). The three types of FOCUS and their apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were compared qualitatively and quantitatively.

FOCUS-DLR+ (3.62, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than FOCUS-DLR- (2.62) and FOCUS-conv (2.88) (P < 0.05). Furthermore, FOCUS-DLR+ showed the highest contrast ratio (CR) between the pancreatic parenchyma and adjacent fat tissue for b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.72 ± 0.08 and 0.68 ± 0.08) and FOCUS-DLR- showed the highest CR between cystic lesions and the pancreatic parenchyma for the b-values of 0 and 600 s/mm2 (0.62 ± 0.21 and 0.62 ± 0.21) (P < 0.05), respectively. FOCUS-DLR+ provided significantly higher ADCs of the pancreas and lesion (1.44 ± 0.24 and 3.00 ± 0.66) compared to FOCUS-DLR- (1.39 ± 0.22 and 2.86 ± 0.61) and significantly lower ADCs compared to FOCUS-conv (1.84 ± 0.45 and 3.32 ± 0.70) (P < 0.05), respectively.

This study evaluated the efficacy of DLR for image quality improvement in reduced-FOV DWI of the pancreas. DLR can significantly denoise images without prolonging the scan time or decreasing the spatial resolution. The denoising level of DWI can be controlled to make the images appear more natural to the human eye. However, this study revealed that DLR did not ameliorate pancreatic distortion. Additionally, physicians should pay attention to the interpretation of ADCs after DLR application because ADCs are significantly changed by DLR.

Pre-operative lumbar spine MRI is usually acquired with the patient supine, whereas lumbar spine surgery is most commonly performed prone. For MRI to be used reliably and safely for intra-operative navigation for foraminal and extraforaminal decompression, the magnitude of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) displacement between supine and prone positions needs to be understood.

A prospective study of a degenerative lumbar spine cohort of 18 subjects indicated for lumbar spine surgery. Three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo and T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo sequences were acquired at 3 T. Displacement and cross-sectional area (CSA) of the bilateral DRGs at 5 motion levels (L1-2 to L5-S1) were determined via 3D segmentation by 2 independent evaluators. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests without correction for multiple comparison were performed against hypothesized 1-mm absolute displacement and corresponding 24% CSA change.

DRG mean absolute displacement was <1 mm (p > 0.99, mean = 0.707 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.659 to 0.755 mm), with the largest directional displacement in the dorsal-to-ventral direction from supine to prone (mean = 0.141 mm, 95% CI = 0.082 to 0.200 mm). Directional displacements caudal-to-cephalad were 0.087 mm (95% CI = 0.022 to 0.151 mm), and left-right were -0.030 mm (95%CI = -0.059 to -0.001 mm). Mean CSA change was within 24% (p > 0.99, mean = -8.30%, 95% CI = -10.5 to -6.09%). Mean absolute displacement was largest for the L1 (mean = 0.811 mm) and L2 (mean = 0.829 mm) DRGs.

Minimal, non-statistically significant soft tissue displacement and morphological area differences were demonstrated between supine and prone positions during 3D lumbar spine MRI.

To compare standard-of-care two-dimensional MRI acquisitions of the cervical spine with those from a single three-dimensional MRI acquisition, reconstructed using a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. We hypothesized that the improved image quality provided by deep-learning-based reconstruction would result in improved inter-rater agreement for cervical spine foraminal stenosis compared to conventional two-dimensional acquisitions.

Forty-one patients underwent routine cervical spine MRI with a conventional protocol comprising two-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scans (2 axial planes, 1 sagittal plane), and an isotropic-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast spin echo scan reconstructed over a 4-h time window with a deep-learning-based reconstruction algorithm. Three radiologists retrospectively assessed images for the degree to which motion artifact limited clinical assessment, and foraminal and central stenosis at each level. Inter-rater agreement was analyzed with weighted Fleiss's kappa (k) and comparisons between two-dimensional and three-dimensional sequences were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Inter-rater agreement for foraminal stenosis was "substantial" for two-dimensional sequences (k = 0.76) and "excellent" for the three-dimensional sequence (k = 0.81). Agreement was "excellent" for both sequences (k = 0.85 and 0.83) for central stenosis. The three-dimensional sequence had less perceptible motion artifact (p ≤ 0.001-0.036). Mean total scan time was 10.8 min for the two-dimensional sequences, and 7.3 min for the three-dimensional sequence.

Three-dimensional MRI reconstructed with a deep-learning-based algorithm provided "excellent" inter-observer agreement for foraminal and central stenosis, which was at least equivalent to standard-of-care two-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional MRI with deep-learning-based reconstruction was less prone to motion artifact, with overall scan time savings.

This study aimed to assess the image quality and accuracy of respiratory-gated real-time two-dimensional (2D) cine incorporating deep learning reconstruction (DLR) for the quantification of biventricular volumes and function compared with those of the standard reference, that is, breath-hold 2D balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) cine, in an adult population. Twenty-four patients (15 men, mean age 50.7 ± 16.5 years) underwent cardiac magnetic resonance for clinical indications, and 2D DLR and bSSFP cine were acquired on the short-axis view. The image quality scores were based on three main criteria: blood-to-myocardial contrast, endocardial edge delineation, and presence of motion artifacts throughout the cardiac cycle. Biventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), stroke volume (SV), ejection fraction (EF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were analyzed. The 2D DLR cine had significantly shorter scan time than bSSFP (41.0 ± 11.3 s vs. 327.6 ± 65.8 s; p < 0.0001). Despite an analysis of endocardial edge definition and motion artifacts showed significant impairment using DLR cine compared with bSSFP (p < 0.01), the two sequences demonstrated no significant difference in terms of biventricular EDV, ESV, SV, and EF (p > 0.05). Moreover, the linear regression yielded good agreement between the two techniques (r ≥ 0.76). However, the LVM was underestimated for DLR cine (109.8 ± 34.6 g) compared with that for bSSFP (116.2 ± 40.2 g; p = 0.0291). Respiratory-gated 2D DLR cine is a reliable technique that could be used in the evaluation of biventricular volumes and function in an adult population.

To develop a joint k-TE reconstruction algorithm to reconstruct the T2-weighted (T2W) images and T2 map simultaneously.

The joint k-TE reconstruction model was formulated as an optimization problem subject to a self-consistency condition of the exponential decay relationship between the T2W images and T2 map. The objective function included a data fidelity term enforcing the agreement between the solution and the measured k-space data, together with a spatial regularization term on image properties of the T2W images. The optimization problem was solved using Alternating-Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). We tested the joint k-TE method in phantom data and healthy volunteer scans with fully-sampled and under-sampled k-space lines. Image quality of the reconstructed T2W images and T2 map, and the accuracy of T2 measurements derived by the joint k- TE and the conventional signal fitting method were compared.

The proposed method improved image quality with reduced noise and less artifacts on both T2W images and T2 map, and increased measurement consistency in T2 relaxation time measurements compared with the conventional method in all data sets.

The proposed reconstruction method outperformed the conventional magnitude image-based signal fitting method in image quality and stability of quantitative T2 measurements.

Deep learning-based MRI reconstruction has recently been introduced to improve image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of deep learning reconstruction in pediatric brain MRI.

A total of 107 consecutive children who underwent 3.0 T brain MRI were included in this study. T2-weighted brain MRI was reconstructed using the three different reconstruction modes: deep learning reconstruction, conventional reconstruction with an intensity filter, and original T2 image without a filter. Two pediatric radiologists independently evaluated the following image quality parameters of three reconstructed images on a 5-point scale: overall image quality, image noisiness, sharpness of gray-white matter differentiation, truncation artifact, motion artifact, cerebrospinal fluid and vascular pulsation artifacts, and lesion conspicuity. The subjective image quality parameters were compared among the three reconstruction modes. Quantitative analysis of the signal uniformity using the coefficient of variation was performed for each reconstruction.

The overall image quality, noisiness, and gray-white matter sharpness were significantly better with deep learning reconstruction than with conventional or original reconstruction (all P < 0.001). Deep learning reconstruction had significantly fewer truncation artifacts than the other two reconstructions (all P < 0.001). Motion and pulsation artifacts showed no significant differences among the three reconstruction modes. For 36 lesions in 107 patients, lesion conspicuity was better with deep learning reconstruction than original reconstruction. Deep learning reconstruction showed lower signal variation compared to conventional and original reconstructions.

Deep learning reconstruction can reduce noise and truncation artifacts and improve lesion conspicuity and overall image quality in pediatric T2-weighted brain MRI.