Catheter-based recanalization procedures have long been standard of care in treating myocardial infarction and stroke. Interventional treatments for pulmonary embolism (PE), however, have only been performed occasionally as second-line strategies until recently. Current guidelines still recommend systemic thrombolysis, which may halve the mortality risk in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism but is underused outside experienced centers. Novel devices for thrombectomy have significantly changed clinical practice and potentially fill a treatment gap in intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism. Observational data are encouraging and randomized controlled trials are underway to prove safety and efficacy, which requires the adaptation of current treatment paradigms. Interdisciplinary pulmonary embolism response teams are needed to provide individualized care, and interventional radiologists are suited to play a pivotal role given their expertise in both diagnostic imaging and invasive procedures. To live up to this challenge, interventional radiologists must familiarize themselves with both the pathophysiology of acute PE as well as with the principles of care provided by other team members. KEY POINTS: Question The recommended treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism is systemic thrombolysis. New devices for percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy aim to change treatment paradigms and need critical review. Findings Observational data suggests both safety and efficacy of novel thrombectomy devices, randomized controlled trials are underway. The added value of catheter-directed thrombolysis is unclear. Clinical relevance Systemic thrombolysis reduces mortality in patients with high-risk pulmonary embolism but is disproportionately rarely used outside of experienced centers. Percutaneous large-bore pulmonary thrombectomy holds great potential for filling a treatment gap in intermediate and high-risk pulmonary embolism and changing guidelines.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening condition characterised by occlusion of the pulmonary vasculature, with a global incidence of approximately 1 in 1,000 patients. While pharmacological therapy remains the cornerstone of PE management, selected patients may benefit from catheter-directed treatments due to their potential for rapid symptom relief and swift haemodynamic stabilisation. Catheter-directed thrombolysis and catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy are current treatment options, though their availability is still limited. This review provides a practical outlook on catheter-directed therapies for PE, outlining optimal procedural planning, device selection, technical execution, evaluation of results, and management of complications.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a major cardiovascular emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite advances in risk stratification models, accurately predicting which intermediate-high-risk patients will deteriorate remains challenging. Systemic thrombolysis, while effective in high-risk PE, is not a viable option for a significant proportion of patients due to contraindications, and its efficacy in the intermediate-high-risk group remains inconclusive. Drawing parallels from acute myocardial infarction and stroke, where percutaneous interventions have revolutionized treatment, interventional therapies are emerging as a promising alternative for PE management. However, challenges persist regarding optimal patient selection, procedural timing, and balancing efficacy with safety. The establishment of pulmonary embolism response teams (PERTs) has played a crucial role in streamlining decision-making and facilitating access to advanced therapies. As novel catheter-based techniques continue to evolve, the field of PE management is undergoing a paradigm shift, mirroring the transformation seen in acute coronary and cerebrovascular care, positioning interventional approaches at the forefront of therapy.

Advancements in percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) have emerged as a promising alternative for the treatment of intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), demonstrating a favorable safety profile and low 30-day mortality. Its adoption and procedural learning curve remain underexplored. This study evaluates the safety, procedural efficiency, and learning curve of PMT over time, using fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and contrast volume as primary metrics.

This was a single-institution, multicenter retrospective study of 411 patients who underwent PMT for intermediate-risk PE from January 2020 to July 2024 across three medical centers involving 15 vascular surgeons. High-risk patients were excluded from the study. Linear regression analysis assessed trends in procedural efficiency, and segmented regression and cumulative sum analyses identified learning curve plateaus. We used t tests to compare hospital and intensive care unit length of stay, as well as complication rates between the first 50 and most last 50 cases. Additionally, multivariable regression examined the impact of patient factors-including body mass index, sex, age, and comorbidities-on procedural efficiency. All statistical analyses were performed using Python (Python Software Foundation, Wilmington, DE).

Regression analysis revealed statistically significant decreases in fluoroscopy time (R2 = 0.103; P < .001), contrast volume (R2 = 0.071; P < .001), and procedure time (R2 = 0.068; P < .001) over time. Segmented regression identified proficiency plateaus at 55 cases for fluoroscopy time and 138 cases for procedure time. On an individual basis, an estimated 3.4 cases were required to achieve imaging efficiency proficiency and 8.6 cases for procedural proficiency per surgeon. Cumulative sum analysis demonstrated a consistent negative trend in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, and contrast volume, confirming sustained improvements in procedural efficiency over the study period. The t tests comparing the first and last 50 cases showed no statistically significant differences in hospital length of stay (6.23 days vs 5.00 days; P = .406), intensive care unit length of stay (2.31 days vs 1.23 days; P = .256), or complication rate (14% vs 0%; P = .134). The overall mortality rate for the study cohort was 4.49%. No significant trend in 30-day mortality was observed over time, consistent with the low overall mortality rate in this intermediate-risk cohort.

PMT for PE demonstrates a favorable learning curve, with significant improvements in procedural efficiency over time. Fluoroscopy time and procedure time plateau at distinct points, reflecting different aspects of skill acquisition, although other factors like anatomical variability and operating room staff could have had an impact. The procedure maintains low complication and mortality rates, supporting its safety and feasibility across a range of clinical settings. These findings suggest that PMT can be adopted rapidly by vascular surgeons with minimal impact from patient demographics or comorbidities.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a serious and potentially fatal condition that is relatively rare in the pediatric population. In patients presenting with massive/submassive PE, catheter-directed Therapy (CDT) presents an emerging therapeutic modality by which PE can be managed.

Electronic databases were systematically searched through May 2024. This systematic review was performed in line with recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (Reg. no. CRD42024534229).

Sixteen case reports/series were included in the quantitative analysis with a total population of 40 children diagnosed with PE. Of them, 21 were females and 19 were males. Massive PE was diagnosed in 15 patients and submassive PE was diagnosed in 17 patients. Complete resolution of PE happened at a rate of 68% (95%CI = 46-80%). Mortality was encountered at a rate of 18% (95%CI = 0.7-36%). PE recurred after CDT at a rate of 15% (95%CI = 2-28%). Non-major bleeding complicated CDT at a rate of 46% (95%CI = 25-66%, p = 0.163).

CDT can be utilized in the management of PE in children as a potential therapeutic option for selected patients. While the results of CDT interventions for pediatric PE are promising, further research -including well-conducted cohort studies- is required to validate those results.

Advances in imaging, pharmacological, and procedural technologies have rapidly expanded the care of pulmonary embolism. Earlier, more accurate identification and quantification has enhanced risk stratification across the spectrum of the disease process, with a number of clinical tools available to prognosticate outcomes and guide treatment. Direct oral anticoagulants have enabled a consistent and more convenient long-term therapeutic option, with a greater shift toward outpatient treatment for a select group of low-risk patients. The array of catheter-directed therapies now available has contributed to a more versatile and nuanced armamentarium of treatment options, including ultrasound-facilitated thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy. Research into supportive care for pulmonary embolism have explored the optimal use of vasopressors and volume resuscitation, as well as utilization of various devices, including right ventricular mechanical support and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Even in the realm of surgery, outcomes have steadily improved in experienced centers. This rapid expansion in diagnostic and therapeutic data has necessitated implementation of pulmonary embolism response teams to better interpret the available evidence, manage the utilization of advanced therapies, and coordinate multidisciplinary care. We provide a narrative review of the risk stratification and management of pulmonary embolism, with a focus on structuralizing the multidisciplinary approach and organizing the literature on new and emerging therapies.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis reduces the thrombolytic time and dose of thrombolytic drugs without affecting the thrombolytic effect to ensure that bleeding does not occur. This helps clinicians choose safer CDT treatments for their patients. We combine the historical process of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy for VTE and prospect the future development of CDT.

We report the case of a 38-year-old woman with a history of extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) who became pregnant and developed portal vein thrombosis. She gave birth after intervention by gastroenterology and cardiology. She was referred to our department due to significant leg edema at eight weeks of gestation, and we noticed EHPVO, portal vein thrombosis, and left pulmonary arteriovenous fistula by contrast-enhanced CT. Therefore, subcutaneous heparin injections of 10,000 units/day were started as a preventive anticoagulant therapy. We performed an emergency cesarean section at 36 weeks of gestation. After surgery, the mother was administered a continuous heparin infusion. On the 11th day after surgery, the postoperative progress was good, so heparin was switched to oral warfarin, and the patient was discharged on the same day. During pregnancy, the risk of varicose vein rupture, hyperammonemia, and pulmonary hypertension increases due to an increase in circulating blood volume. This was a case in which careful perinatal management was performed in collaboration with other departments, resulting in a live birth.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE), which can lead to cardiac and respiratory arrest, is a rare complication of cerebral angiography. However, neurologists do not pay attention to this.

A 47-year-old male with a history of type 2 diabetes was admitted to our hospital for evaluation of surgical indications for unruptured ophthalmic aneurysms. After cerebral angiography, a fatal PE occurred. Through rapid identification and effective drug treatment, the patient recovered and was discharged.

A diagnosis of fatal PE was made based on the bedside ultrasonography and blood d-dimer level.

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and intravenous thrombolysis of "50 mg alteplase" for continuous intravenous drip for 2 hours.

The patient was recovered and no special discomfort was reported.

PE is a rare complication of cerebral angiography, but the fatality rate is very high. Neurologists must not only early identify and effectively treat this complication, but more importantly, pay attention to this complication, prevent it in advance, and reduce the occurrence of catastrophic events.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE), often resulting from deep vein thrombosis (DVT), is the third most frequent cause of cardiovascular death and is associated with increasing incidence, causing considerable morbidity and mortality. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and outcomes of treatment options in the management of acute PE and DVT, encompassing both established and emerging technologies, such as catheter-directed thrombolysis, aspiration thrombectomy, and other endovascular techniques. A comprehensive literature review was conducted, assessing clinical studies, trials, and case reports that detail the use of percutaneous interventions for PE and DVT and analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of each percutaneous system. Several percutaneous treatments have shown promising results, especially in cases where rapid thrombus resolution is critical, such as in high- and intermediate-high-risk patients. The incidence of major complications, such as bleeding, remains a consideration, though it is generally manageable with proper patient selection and technique. It is fundamentally important to tailor the specific treatment strategy to the clinical and anatomical characteristics of each patient. Percutaneous treatments for acute PE and DVT represent valuable options in the therapeutic arsenal, offering enhanced outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Ongoing advancements in technology and technique, along with comprehensive clinical trials, are essential to further define the role and optimize the use of these interventions.

Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a silent epidemic, causing approximately 300,000 intensive care unit (ICU) admissions annually, with a 30% mortality rate. Despite worldwide efforts to optimize the management of patients and improve outcomes, the level of evidence for the treatment of these patients remains low. The concomitant occurrence of thromboembolic events, particularly pulmonary embolism (PE), remains a challenge for intensivists due to the risks of anticoagulation to the injured brain. We performed a literature review on sTBI and concomitant PE to identify and report the most recent advances on this topic. We searched PubMed and Scopus for papers published in the last five years that included the terms "pulmonary embolism" and "traumatic brain injury" in their title or abstract. Exclusion criteria were papers referring to children, non-sTBI populations, and post-acute care. Our search revealed 75 papers, of which 38 are included in this review. The main topics covered include the prevalence of and risk factors for pulmonary embolism, the challenges of timely diagnosis in the ICU, the timing of pharmacological prophylaxis, and the treatment of diagnosed PE.

Systemic thrombolysis (ST) may not be ideal for many patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) due to bleeding risk. In this analysis, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) as an alternative to ST for acute PE.

Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent MT and/or ST for PE were identified from the National Inpatient Sample database from 2016 to 2017. Patients who underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis were excluded. We compared in-hospital outcomes of both groups in this retrospective study.

Of 16 890 patients who received an intervention for acute PE, 1380 (8.2%) received MT and 15 510 (91.8%) received ST. There was no difference in age between both groups. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in patients who received MT than that in those who received ST (11.9% vs 20.6%, odds ratio [OR]: 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.93, p=0.028). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of periprocedural bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage, and acute kidney injury between the 2 groups (p≥0.608 for all). Patients who received MT had a higher rate of respiratory complications (19.0% vs 11.6%, OR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.06-3.03, p=0.030) and discharge to an outside facility (34.1% vs 19.2%, OR: 2.18, 95% CI: 1.41-3.37, p<0.001) than those who received ST.

Mortality was significantly lower with MT than that with ST, but larger randomized studies are needed to validate this. The use of MT should be individualized on the basis of the patients' clinical presentation, risk profile, and local resources.

In this study, we utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to study the in-hospital outcomes of pulmonary embolism patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy compared to those who underwent systemic thrombolysis. We found that the patients who were diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and underwent mechanical thrombectomy had significantly lower mortality compared to those who were treated using systemic thrombolysis. This study was the first of its kind, utilizing the national inpatient sample database for evaluation of mechanical thrombectomy in comparison with the standard of care. These result would direct further randomized controlled trials for better evaluation of the utilization of mechanical thrombectomy in the correct clinical context. Furthermore, our study demonstrated comparable peri-operative complications between the mechanical thrombectomy group and the systemic thrombolysis group. These results would direct clinicians to consider mechanical thrombectomy if clinically indicated given the promising results.

Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is one of the modes of treatment for massive pulmonary embolism (PE). This case report shares the new experience of CDT for massive PE at Teaching Hospital Jaffna, Sri Lanka. A 54-year-old woman developed massive PE two days after a traumatic tibial fracture. She was hemodynamically unstable with hypotension and hypoxemia. The multidisciplinary team decided to go for CDT, administering alteplase. Follow-up imaging demonstrated complete thrombus resolution and significant clinical improvement. This case emphasizes the efficacy and safety of CDT for massive PE, particularly in patients at high risk for bleeding. Our experience at Teaching Hospital Jaffna accentuates the significance of individualized treatment strategies and the adoption of advanced techniques in resource-limited settings.

To demonstrate the technical aspects of the novel Penumbra Indigo Lightning Flash System (Penumbra, Inc.) for mechanical thrombectomy of pulmonary embolism (PE).

The novel Penumbra Lightning Flash catheter is a 16 French (F) sheath-compatible device designed for advanced thrombectomy, especially in the pulmonary arteries. This device has large thrombus burden removal capacity; however, technical nuances are necessary to accomplish more with efficacy pulmonary embolism management. Access sites, pulmonary arteries catheterization technique, thrombectomy device navigation and mechanism of action are described thoroughly.

Penumbra Indigo Lightning Flash system for mechanical thrombectomy as other catheter-directed treatments (CDTs) represents a major advance in contemporary PE management. With favorable safety profile and efficacy, CDTs have become an integral component of the multidisciplinary approach to PE care.

The article highlights the Penumbra Indigo Lightning Flash System as a significant advancement in mechanical thrombectomy for pulmonary embolism (PE). By detailing technical aspects and procedural nuances, it supports clinicians for improvement in endovascular PE management. The system's integration into multidisciplinary care represents a major step forward, providing an effective alternative to traditional therapies, particularly for high-risk PE patients. This innovation promises to enhance patient outcomes in contemporary PE management.

Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome (CAPS), a severe systemic autoimmune disorder, predominantly causes life-threatening multi-organ failure, with a high mortality rate. It primarily affects small vessels, seldom impacting large vessels. Notably, acute massive pulmonary embolism (PE) with bilateral atrial thrombosis is an exceptional occurrence in CAPS. Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common cardiovascular disease that progresses rapidly and has a high mortality rate. Acute massive PE combined with bilateral atrial thrombosis has an even higher mortality rate. PE treatments primarily include pharmaceuticals, catheter interventions, and surgical measures, with integrated treatment strategies demonstrating promising outcomes in clinical practice. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can provide cardiopulmonary support for the treatment of high-risk PE patients and is a proven therapeutic measure.

This report presents the case of a 52-year-old male admitted due to fever and sudden onset of impaired consciousness, with cardiac ultrasound and pulmonary artery CT angiography revealing an acute large-scale pulmonary embolism accompanied by bilateral atrial thrombosis, with the condition rapidly worsening and manifesting severe respiratory and circulatory failure. With ECMO support, the patient underwent a thrombectomy using an AngioJet intervention. The diagnosis of CAPS was confirmed through clinical presentation and laboratory examination, and treatment was adjusted accordingly.

The patient made a successful recovery and was subsequently discharged from the hospital.

In CAPS patients, the rare instance of acute massive PE accompanied by bilateral atrial thrombosis significantly risks severe respiratory and circulatory failure, adversely affecting prognosis. Early initiation of ECMO therapy is crucial, offering a vital opportunity to address the root cause. In this case report the patient was successfully treated with an AngioJet thrombectomy supported by ECMO.

Pulmonary embolism is a debilitating and potentially life-threatening disease characterized by high mortality and long-term adverse outcomes. Traditional treatment options are fraught with serious bleeding risks and incomplete thrombus removal, necessitating the development of innovative treatment strategies. While new interventional approaches offer promising potential for improved outcomes with fewer serious complications, their rapid development and need for more comparative clinical evidence makes it challenging for physicians to select the optimal treatment for each patient among the many options. This review summarizes the current published clinical data for both traditional treatments and more recent interventional approaches indicated for pulmonary embolism. While published studies thus far suggest that these newer interventional devices offer safe and effective options, more data is needed to understand their impact relative to the standard of care. The studies in progress that are anticipated to provide needed evidence are reviewed here since they will be critical for helping physicians make informed treatment choices and potentially driving necessary guideline changes.

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel endovascular thrombectomy device in a swine model of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The device has an over-the-wire configuration, a manually expandable catching basket, a funnel sheath with a covered stent to minimize the risk of microembolization, and an integrated delivery system. DVT was induced by occluding the right iliac vein with a balloon catheter and injecting thrombin. The novel device was inserted into the inferior vena cava through the right jugular vein access. The device effectively removed the thrombus, restoring venous patency without residual thrombus, vessel injury, or complications. These findings suggest the potential advantages of the novel device over predicate devices. Further clinical evaluation is needed to establish the efficacy of this device in human patients with DVT.

Introduction  Pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with approximately 10.5% of maternal deaths in the United States. Despite heightened awareness of its mortality potential, there islittle data available to guide its management in pregnancy. We present the case of a massive PE during gestation successfully treated with catheter-directed embolectomy. Case Presentation  A 37-year-old G2P1001 presented with a syncopal episode preceded by dyspnea and chest pain. Upon presentation, she was hypotensive, tachycardiac, and hypoxic. Imaging showed an occlusive bilateral PE, right heart strain, and a possible intrauterine pregnancy. Beta-human chorionic gonadotropin was positive. She was taken emergently for catheter-directed embolectomy. Her condition immediately improved afterward. Postprocedure pelvic ultrasound confirmed a viable intrauterine pregnancy at 10 weeks gestation. She was discharged with therapeutic enoxaparin and gave birth to a healthy infant at 38 weeks gestation. Conclusion  Despite being the gold standard for PE treatment in nonpregnant adults, systemic thrombolysis is relatively contraindicated in pregnancy due to concern for maternal or fetal hemorrhage. Surgical or catheter-based thrombectomies are rarely recommended. Limited alternative options force their consideration, particularly in a hemodynamically unstable patient. Catheter-directed embolectomy can possibly bypass such complications. Our case exemplifies the consideration of catheter-directed embolectomy as the initial treatment modality of a hemodynamically unstable gestational PE.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) ranks as a leading cause of in-hospital mortality and the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. The spectrum of PE manifestations varies widely, making it difficult to determine the best treatment approach for specific patients. Conventional treatment options include anticoagulation, thrombolysis, or surgery, but emerging percutaneous interventional procedures are being investigated for their potential benefits in heterogeneous PE populations. These novel interventional techniques encompass catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and hybrid approaches combining different mechanisms. Furthermore, inferior vena cava filters are also available as an option for PE prevention. Such interventions may offer faster improvements in right ventricular function, as well as in pulmonary and systemic haemodynamics, in individual patients. Moreover, percutaneous treatment may be a valid alternative to traditional therapies in high bleeding risk patients and could potentially reduce the burden of mortality related to major bleeds, such as that of haemorrhagic strokes. Nevertheless, the safety and efficacy of these techniques compared to conservative therapies have not been conclusively established. This review offers a comprehensive evaluation of the current evidence for percutaneous interventions in PE and provides guidance for selecting appropriate patients and treatments. It serves as a valuable resource for future researchers and clinicians seeking to advance this field. Additionally, we explore future perspectives, proposing "percutaneous primary pulmonary intervention" as a potential paradigm shift in the field.

Catheter-based revascularization procedures were developed as an alternative to systemic thrombolysis for patients with intermediate-high- and high-risk pulmonary embolisms. USAT IH-PE is a retrospective and prospective multicenter registry of such patients treated with ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed thrombolysis, whose preliminary results are presented in this study. The primary endpoint was the incidence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) at follow-up. Secondary endpoints were short- and mid-term changes in the echocardiographic parameters of right ventricle (RV) function, in-hospital and all-cause mortality, and procedure-related bleeding events. Between March 2018 and July 2023, 102 patients were included. The majority were at intermediate-high-risk PE (86%), were mostly female (57%), and had a mean age of 63.7 ± 14.5 years, and 28.4% had active cancer. Echocardiographic follow-up was available for 70 patients, and in only one, the diagnosis of PH was confirmed by right heart catheterization, resulting in an incidence of 1.43% (CI 95%, 0.036-7.7). RV echocardiographic parameters improved both at 24 h and at follow-up. In-hospital mortality was 3.9% (CI 95%, 1.08-9.74), while all-cause mortality was 11% (CI 95%, 5.4-19.2). Only 12% had bleeding complications, of whom 4.9% were BARC ≥ 3. Preliminary results from the USAT IH-PE registry showed a low incidence of PH, improvement in RV function, and a safe profile.

A 40-year-old patient confirmed on computed tomography of the pulmonary arteries (CT/PAs) a large saddle pulmonary embolus in the main PA extending in both branches. He was managed by ultrasound-supported catheter-directed (EkoSonic, Boston Scientific) intrapulmonary thrombolytic therapy using a recombinant tissue plasminogen activator prolonged infusion over 16 h with a total dose of 50 mg divided in both PAs simultaneously with intravenous unfractionated heparin. He showed clinical improvement with improved arterial oxygen (PaO2) with reduced oxygen therapy with a nasal cannula. Follow-up right heart catheterization showed a significant reduction of PA pressure from 96/32 (mean 64) to 47/27 (mean 39) mmHg. Repeat pulmonary angiography showed significant improvement in PA branch opacification, suggesting increased flow and successful therapy. The patient received oral anticoagulants for months. He had followed with CT/PA and echocardiogram after 4 weeks, both were normalized. He resumed his regular physical activities, including exercises in the gymnasium.

Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) carries significant 30-day mortality and is characterized by acute right ventricular failure, hypotension, and hypoxia, leading to cardiovascular collapse and cardiac arrest. Given the continued high mortality associated with MPE, there has been ongoing interest in utilizing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) to provide oxygenation support to improve hypoxia and offload the right ventricular (RV) pressure in the belief that rapid reduction of hypoxia and RV pressure will improve outcomes. Two modalities can be employed: Veno-arterial-ECMO is a reliable process to decrease RV overload and improve RV function, thus allowing for hemodynamic stability and restoration of tissue oxygenation. Veno-venous ECMO can support oxygenation but is not designed to help circulation. Several societal guidelines now suggest using ECMO in MPE with interventional therapy. There are three strategies for ECMO utilization in MPE: bridge to definitive interventional therapy, sole therapy, and recovery after interventional treatment. The use of ECMO in MPE has been associated with lower mortality in registry reviews, but there has been no significant difference in outcomes between patients treated with and without ECMO in meta-analyses. Considerable heterogeneity in studies is a significant weakness of the available literature. Applying ECMO is also associated with substantial multisystem morbidity due to a systemic inflammatory response, hemorrhagic stroke, renal dysfunction, and bleeding, which must be factored into the outcomes. The application of ECMO in MPE should be combined with an aggressive pulmonary interventional program and should strictly adhere to the current selection criteria.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a prevalent condition with a substantial morbi-mortality worldwide. Proper risk stratification of PE is essential for identifying the most suitable therapeutic strategy and the optimal care setting for the patient. This process entails evaluating various factors, including symptoms, comorbidities, and right heart dysfunction.

This review assesses the tools and methods utilized to identify and stratify individuals based on the probability of developing deterioration or death related to PE. Current guidelines divide PE into three groups: high-risk (previously termed massive) PE, intermediate-risk (sub-massive) PE, and low-risk PE. Various risk scores, such as the simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI), Bova score, and the FAST score (incorporating Heart-Fatty Acid binding protein [H-ABP], Syncope, Tachycardia), aid in identifying patients at higher risk. Additionally, the Hestia score is instrumental in pinpointing low-risk patients.

Presently, there is a dearth of high-quality frameworks for the optimal management and treatment of PE patients at risk of hemodynamic collapse. A consortium of experts is in the process of formulating a new conceptual model for risk stratification, taking into account a comprehensive array of variables and outcomes to facilitate more individualized management of acute PE.

High-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE), defined as acute PE associated with hemodynamic instability, remains a significant contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the United States and worldwide. Historically, anticoagulant therapy in addition to systemic thrombolysis has been the mainstays of medical therapy for the majority of patients with high-risk PE. In efforts to reduce the morbidity and mortality, a wide array of interventional and surgical therapies has been developed and employed in the management of these patients. However, the most recent guidelines for the management of PE have reserved the use of these advanced therapies in scenarios where thrombolytic therapy plus anticoagulation are unsuccessful. This is due largely to the lack of prospective, randomized studies in this population. Stemming from this, the approach to treatment of these patients varies widely depending on institutional experience and resources. Furthermore, morbidity and mortality remain unacceptably high in this population, with estimated 30-day mortality of at least 30%. As such, development of a standardized approach to treatment of these patients is paramount to improving outcomes. Early and accurate risk stratification in conjunction with a multidisciplinary team approach in the form of a PE response team is crucial. With the advent of novel therapies for the treatment of acute PE, in addition to the growing availability of and familiarity with mechanical circulatory support systems, such a standardized approach may now be within reach.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common disease associated with high morbidity and mortality. Currently, guidelines recommend systemic thrombolysis in patients with haemodynamic instability (high-risk PE) or patients with intermediate-high-risk PE with haemodynamic deterioration. Nevertheless, more than half of high-risk PE patients do not receive systemic thrombolysis due to a perceived increased risk of bleeding. In these cases, percutaneous catheter-directed therapy (CDT) or surgical embolectomy should be considered. CDT has emerged and appears to be an effective alternative in treating PE, with a hypothetical lower risk of bleeding than systemic thrombolysis, acting directly in the thrombus with a much lower dose of thrombolytic drug or even without thrombolytic therapy. CDT techniques include catheter-directed clot aspiration or fragmentation, mechanical embolectomy, local thrombolysis, and combined pharmaco-mechanical approaches. A few observational prospective studies have demonstrated that CDT improves right ventricular function with a low rate of haemorrhage. Nevertheless, the evidence from randomised controlled trials is scarce. Here we review different scenarios where CDT may be useful and trials ongoing in this field. These results may change the upcoming guidelines for management and treatment of PE, establishing CDT as a recommended treatment in patients with acute intermediate-high-risk PE.

Endovascular sonothrombolysis has gained significant attention due to its benefits, including direct targeting of the thrombus with sonication and reduced side effects. However, the small aperture of endovascular transducers restricts the improvement of their potential clinical efficiency due to inefficient acoustic radiation. Hence, in an earlier study, we used vortex ultrasound with an endovascular ultrasound transducer to induce shear stress and enhance the clot lysis. In this study, the vortex acoustic transduction mechanism was investigated using numerical simulations and hydrophone tests. Following this characterization, we demonstrated the performance of the vortex ultrasound transducer in thrombolysis of retracted clots in in vitro tests. The test results indicated that the maximum lysis rates were 79.0% and 32.2% with the vortex ultrasound for unretracted and retracted clots, respectively. The vortex ultrasound enhanced the efficiency of the thrombolysis by approximately 49%, both for retracted and unretracted clots, compared with the typical non-vortex ultrasound technique. Therefore, the use of endovascular vortex ultrasound holds promise as a potential clinical option for the thrombolysis of retracted clots.

Filling defects identified in the pulmonary arterial tree are commonly presumed to represent an embolic phenomenon originating from thrombi formed in remote veins, particularly lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT). However, accumulating evidence supports an underappreciated cause for pulmonary arterial thrombosis (PAT), namely, de novo thrombogenesis-whereby thrombosis arises within the pulmonary arteries in the absence of DVT. Although historically underrecognized, in situ PAT has become of heightened importance with the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 infection. In situ PAT is attributed to endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and acute lung injury and has been described in a range of conditions including COVID-19, trauma, acute chest syndrome in sickle cell disease, pulmonary infections, and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. The distinction between pulmonary embolism and in situ PAT may have important implications regarding management decisions and clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the pathophysiology, imaging appearances, and management of in situ PAT in various clinical situations. This understanding will promote optimal tailored treatment strategies for this increasingly recognized entity.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is thought to occur as a sequelae of thromboembolic processes in the pulmonary vasculature. The pathophysiology of CTEPH is multifactorial, including impaired fibrinolysis, endothelial dysregulation, and hypoxic adaptations. The diagnosis of CTEPH is typically delayed considering the nonspecific nature of the symptoms, lack of screening, and relatively low incidence. Diagnostic tools include ventilation-perfusion testing, echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, and pulmonary angiography. The only potentially curative treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy However, approximately 40% of patients are inoperable. Currently, only Riociguat is Food and Drug Administration approved specifically for CTEPH, with additional drug trials underway.

Evidence supporting interventional pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment is needed.

We aimed to evaluate the acute safety and effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy for intermediate- and high-risk PE in a large real-world population.

FLASH is a multicentre, prospective registry enrolling up to 1,000 US and European PE patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy using the FlowTriever System. The primary safety endpoint is a major adverse event composite including device-related death and major bleeding at 48 hours, and intraprocedural adverse events. Acute mortality and 48-hour outcomes are reported. Multivariate regression analysed characteristics associated with pulmonary artery pressure and dyspnoea improvement.

Among 800 patients in the full US cohort, 76.7% had intermediate-high risk PE, 7.9% had high-risk PE, and 32.1% had thrombolytic contraindications. Major adverse events occurred in 1.8% of patients. All-cause mortality was 0.3% at 48-hour follow-up and 0.8% at 30-day follow-up, with no device-related deaths. Immediate haemodynamic improvements included a 7.6 mmHg mean drop in mean pulmonary artery pressure (-23.0%; p<0.0001) and a 0.3 L/min/m2 mean increase in cardiac index (18.9%; p<0.0001) in patients with depressed baseline values. Most patients (62.6%) had no overnight intensive care unit stay post-procedure. At 48 hours, the echocardiographic right ventricle/left ventricle ratio decreased from 1.23±0.36 to 0.98±0.31 (p<0.0001 for paired values) and patients with severe dyspnoea decreased from 66.5% to 15.6% (p<0.0001).  Conclusions: Mechanical thrombectomy with the FlowTriever System demonstrates a favourable safety profile, improvements in haemodynamics and functional outcomes, and low 30-day mortality for intermediate- and high-risk PE.

Catheter-directed interventions have slowly been gaining ground in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE), especially in patients with increased risk of bleeding. The goal of this study is to summarize the evidence for the efficacy and safety of percutaneous thrombectomy (PT) in patients with contraindications to systemic and local thrombolysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Cochrane, Scopus and the Web of Science databases for studies from inception to March 2022. We included patients with intermediate- and high-risk PE with contraindications to thrombolysis; patients who received systematic or local thrombolysis were excluded. Primary endpoint was in-hospital and 30-day mortality, with secondary outcomes based on hemodynamic and radiographic changes. Major bleeding events were assessed as a safety endpoint. Seventeen studies enrolled 455 patients, with a mean age of 58.6 years and encompassing 50.4% females. In-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were 4% (95% CI 3-6%) and 5% (95% CI 3-9%) for all-comers, respectively. We found a post-procedural reduction in systolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressures by 15.4 mmHg (95% CI 7-23.7) and 10.3 mmHg (95% CI 3.1-17.5) respectively. The RV/LV ratio and Miller Index were reduced by 0.42 (95% CI 0.38-46) and 7.8 (95% CI 5.2-10.5). Major bleeding events occurred in 4% (95% CI 3-6%). This is the first meta-analysis to report pooled outcomes on PT in intermediate- and high-risk PE patients without the use of systemic or local thrombolytics. The overall mortality rate is comparable to other contemporary treatments, and is an important modality particularly in those with contraindications for adjunctive thrombolytic therapy. Further studies are needed to understand the interplay of anticoagulation with PT and catheter-directed thrombolysis.

The evaluation and management of patients who sustain recurrent thromboembolic events while taking therapeutic anticoagulation have not been well characterized; moreover, there has been no systematic review or randomized trial focused on treating patients with recurrent deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) during anticoagulant treatment. Therefore, we developed a pilot trial to compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin versus acenocoumarol in patients with recurrent venous thromboembolism despite ongoing anticoagulation with rivaroxaban.

The study was a multicenter, randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients with objectively documented recurrent venous thromboembolism to receive rivaroxaban (20 mg once a day) plus aspirin (300 mg once a day) or an adjusted dose of acenocoumarol. The study was designed to evaluate the incidence of recurrent thromboembolic events (recurrent ipsilateral or contralateral DVT, PE, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction) and hemorrhagic events.

A total of 58 patients were randomized: 28 were allocated to the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group and 30 to the acenocoumarol group. After 90 days of follow-up, three recurrent thromboembolic events (primary outcome) occurred in the acenocoumarol group - two DVTs and one ischemic stroke - and zero events in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (risk ratio [RR] 0.15; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.008-2.83; P = 0.20). Minor bleeding occurred in five patients in the acenocoumarol group and zero in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group (RR 0.09; 95 % CI 0.005-1.68; p = 0.10). There was one non-fatal gastrointestinal major bleed in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group.

In this pilot study, there were no significant differences in any outcome assessed; however, recurrent thromboembolic events and minor bleeding events occurred numerically less frequently in the rivaroxaban plus aspirin group. These data suggest the need to carry out more extensive randomized studies with sufficient statistical power to clarify these results.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) leads to an abrupt increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular afterload, and when significant enough, can result in hemodynamic instability. High-risk PE is a dire cardiovascular emergency and portends a poor prognosis. Traditional therapeutic options to rapidly reduce thrombus burden like systemic thrombolysis and surgical pulmonary endarterectomy have limitations, both with regards to appropriate candidates and efficacy, and have limited data demonstrating their benefit in high-risk PE. There are growing percutaneous treatment options for acute PE that include both localized thrombolysis and mechanical embolectomy. Data for such therapies with high-risk PE are currently limited. However, given the limitations, there is an opportunity to improve outcomes, with percutaneous treatments options offering new mechanisms for clot reduction with a possible improved safety profile compared with systemic thrombolysis. Additionally, mechanical circulatory support options allow for complementary treatment for patients with persistent instability, allowing for a bridge to more definitive treatment options. As more data develop, a shift toward a percutaneous approach with mechanical circulatory support may become a preferred option for the management of high-risk PE at tertiary care centers.

Minimally invasive interventional techniques are being utilised more frequently in the management of acute and chronic pulmonary emboli; however, robust clinical evidence is only emerging for the utilisation of these techniques. Hence, there is a need for a robust mechanism of patient selection and careful consideration of the benefits and risks of the interventions. In this review, we discuss the risk stratification mechanisms; the role of the multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team to support decision-making; and describe the various commonly used interventional techniques and how these can be integrated into treatment strategies for the benefit of our patients.

High safety-net burden hospitals (HBHs) treating large numbers of uninsured or Medicaid-insured patients have generally been linked to worse clinical outcomes. However, limited data exist on the impact of the hospitals' safety-net burden on in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) outcomes in the United States.

To compare the differences in survival to discharge, routine discharge home, and healthcare resource utilization between patients at HBH with those treated at low safety-net burden hospital (LBH).

Retrospective cohort study across hospitals in the United States: Hospitalized patients greater than or equal to 18 years that underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) between 2008 and 2018 identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Database. Data analysis was conducted in January 2022.

IHCA.

The primary outcome is survival to hospital discharge. Other outcomes are routine discharge home among survivors, length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization cost.

From 2008 to 2018, an estimated 555,016 patients were hospitalized with IHCA, of which 19.2% occurred at LBH and 55.2% at HBH. Compared with LBH, patients at HBH were younger (62 ± 20 yr vs 67 ± 17 yr) and predominantly in the lowest median household income (< 25th percentile). In multivariate analysis, HBH was associated with lower chances of survival to hospital discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and lower odds of routine discharge (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.47-0.75), compared with LBH. In addition, IHCA patients at publicly owned hospitals and those with medium and large hospital bed size were less likely to survive to hospital discharge, while patients with median household income greater than 25th percentile had better odds of hospital survival.

Our study suggests that patients who experience IHCA at HBH may have lower rates and odds of in-hospital survival and are less likely to be routinely discharged home after CPR. Median household income and hospital-level characteristics appear to contribute to survival.

The sex differences in use, safety outcomes, and health-care resource use of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) undergoing percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy are not well characterized.

What are the sex differences in outcomes for patients diagnosed with PE who undergo percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy?

This retrospective cross-sectional study used national inpatient claims data to identify patients in the United States with a discharge diagnosis of PE who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy between January 2016 and December 2018. We evaluated the demographics, comorbidities, safety outcomes (in-hospital mortality), and health-care resource use (discharge to home, length of stay, and hospital charges) of patients with PE undergoing percutaneous thrombectomy.

Among 1,128,904 patients with a diagnosis of PE between 2016 and 2018, 5,160 patients (0.5%) underwent percutaneous pulmonary artery thrombectomy. When compared with male patients, female patients showed higher procedural bleeding (16.9% vs 11.2%; P < .05), required more blood transfusions (11.9% vs 5.7%; P < .05), and experienced more vascular complications (5.0% vs 1.5%; P < .05). Women experienced higher in-hospital mortality (16.9% vs 9.3%; adjusted OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2-3.0; P = .003) when compared with men. Although length of stay and hospital charges were similar to those of men, women were less likely to be discharged home after surviving hospitalization (47.9% vs 60.3%; adjusted OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99; P = .04).

In this large nationwide cohort, women with PE who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy showed higher morbidity and in-hospital mortality compared with men.

Compare in-hospital outcomes of patients treated with either mechanical thrombectomy (MT) or catheter directed lysis (CDL) in treatment of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).

This is a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing MT or CDL for acute PE between 2014 and 2021. The primary outcome was the composite of in-hospital death, significant bleed, vascular complication, or need for mechanical support post-procedure. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the composite outcome in addition to blood transfusions, invasive hemodynamics, echocardiographic data, and intensive care unit (ICU) utilization.

458 patients were treated for PE with 266 patients in the CDL arm and 192 patients in the MT arm. The primary composite endpoint was not significantly different between the two groups with CDL 12% versus MT 11% (p = 0.5). There was a significant difference in total length of ICU time required with more in the CDL group versus MT (3.8 ± 2.0 vs. 2.8 ± 3.0 days, p = 0.009). All other secondary end points showed no significant difference between the groups.

In patients undergoing catheter directed treatment of PE, there was no difference between MT and CDL in terms of in-hospital mortality, bleeds, catheter-related complications, and hemodynamics.

There are no randomized trials studying the outcomes of mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) for management of pulmonary embolism (PE).

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing literature to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MAT in the setting of PE. Inclusion criteria were as follows: studies reporting more than five patients, study involved MAT, and reported clinical outcomes and pulmonary artery pressures. Studies were excluded if they failed to separate thrombectomy data from catheter-directed thrombolysis data. Databases searched include PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science until April, 2021.

Fourteen case series were identified, consisting of 516 total patients (mean age 58.4 ± 13.6 years). Three studies had only high-risk PE, two studies had only intermediate-risk PE, and the remaining nine studies had a combination of both high-risk and intermediate-risk PE. Six studies used the Inari FlowTriever device, five studies used the Indigo Aspiration system, and the remaining three studies used the Rotarex or Aspirex suction thrombectomy system. Four total studies employed thrombolytics in a patient-specific manner, with seven receiving local lysis and 17 receiving systemic lysis, and 40 receiving both. A random-effects meta-analyses of proportions of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, technical success, and clinical success were calculated, which yielded estimate pooled percentages [95% CI] of 3.6% [0.7%, 7.9%], 0.5% [0.0%, 1.8%], 97.1% [94.8%, 98.4%], and 90.7% [85.5%, 94.3%].

There is significant heterogeneity in clinical, physiologic, and angiographic data in the currently available data on MAT. RCTs with consistent parameters and outcomes measures are still needed.

Contemporary data on catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) utilization trends and associated hospital outcomes in pulmonary embolism (PE) n the US is limited. Using the nationwide inpatient sample database, we identified patients hospitalized for acute PE treated with CDT from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018. Cochrane-Armitage test was used to evaluate the temporal trends in utilization, hospital mortality, and major bleeding rates. Multivariate logistic regression was used to compare differences in the outcomes across race/ethnicity, 4444 patients (unweighted hospitalizations) underwent CDT during the study period. The mean age ± standard deviation of the population was 58 ± 16 years and the majority were males (54%). 3269 (73.6%) patients were non-Hispanic White (NHW), 802 (18.0%) patients were non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and 373 (8.4%) patients were of 'other' races/ethnicities. There was a more than tenfold increase in CDT use in 2018 compared to 2008. The total mortality and bleeding rates were approximately 7 and 10% respectively. Hospital mortality rates trended down across all races/ethnicities during the study period. A similar downward trend in bleeding rates was noted in NHB only (28.6% vs 10.7%, p = 0.04). In-hospital mortality and major bleeding odds were comparable across all races/ethnicities were comparable. NHB patients and other races were more likely to require blood transfusion and incur higher hospitalization costs compared with NHW patients. CDT use increased significantly in the US during the study period with a corresponding downward trend in in-hospital mortality across all races, and bleeding rates in NHB.

Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) affects more than 100 000 people in the United States annually and is the third leading cardiovascular cause of death. The standard management for PE is systemic anticoagulation therapy. However, a subset of patients experience hemodynamic decompensation, despite conservative measures. Traditionally, these patients have been treated with systemic administration of thrombolytic agents or open cardiac surgery, although attempts at endovascular treatment have a long history that dates back to the 1960s. The technology for catheter-based therapy for acute PE is rapidly evolving, with multiple devices approved over the past decade. Currently available devices fall into two broad categories of treatment methods: catheter-directed thrombolysis and percutaneous suction thrombectomy. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is the infusion of thrombolytic agents directly into the occluded pulmonary arteries to increase local delivery and decrease the total dose. Suction thrombectomy involves the use of small- or large-bore catheters to mechanically aspirate a clot from the pulmonary arteries without the need for a thrombolytic agent. A thorough understanding of the various risk stratification schemes and the available evidence for each device is critical for optimal treatment of this complex entity. Multiple ongoing studies will improve our understanding of the role of catheter-based therapy for acute PE in the next 5-10 years. A multidisciplinary approach through PE response teams has become the management standard at most institutions. An invited commentary by Bulman and Weinstein is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is common, life-threatening, and often recurrent among survivors. The clinical manifestations of PE range from incidental detection to sudden death, with approximately one-third of PE deaths occurring suddenly. State-of-the-art management of acute PE relies on early detection, risk stratification based on clinical, imaging, and biomarker criteria, and multidisciplinary decision-making. The primary goal of catheter-directed interventions for acute PE is to interrupt the cycle of right ventricular failure, hypoperfusion, and oxygen supply/demand imbalance by increasing the cross-sectional area of the patent pulmonary vasculature, thereby lowering resistance and alleviating V/Q mismatch. Innovations in percutaneous interventions have led to several approaches described in this review: rheolytic thrombectomy, catheter-directed thrombolysis, and aspiration or mechanical thrombectomy. The central challenge moving forward will be integrating growing clinical trial evidence into multidisciplinary, individualized care pathways meeting the diverse clinical needs of patients presenting with acute PE.

Pulmonary embolism represents a common life-threatening condition. Prompt identification and treatment of this pathological condition are mandatory. In cases of massive pulmonary embolism and hemodynamic instability or right heart failure, interventional radiology treatment for pulmonary embolism is emerging as an alternative to medical treatment (systemic thrombolysis) and surgical treatment. Interventional radiology techniques include percutaneous endovascular catheter directed therapies as selective thrombolysis and thrombus aspiration, which can prove useful in cases of failure or infeasibility of medical and surgical approaches.

Acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism (PE) has a high mortality rate of 18%-65%. Along with anticoagulation and thrombolytic therapy, treatment may require a catheter-based thrombectomy or surgical thrombectomy. We report a case of pulmonary thromboembolism treated with a Stent Retriever (Trevo® NXT ProVue Retriever, Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI, USA), which is commonly used to treat stroke. An 81-year-old woman complained of back pain and was transported to our hospital after she became unconscious. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated before her arrival at the hospital; she returned to spontaneous circulation after arrival. After undergoing computed tomography (CT) scanning, she went into cardiac arrest again, and we established veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and performed catheter thrombectomy using a stent retriever. The left basilar pulmonary artery and the right middle pulmonary artery trunk were retrieved after the stent's deployment, and bilateral pulmonary arteries were confirmed to be reopened. A residual thrombus was present, and Monteplase was administered. A contrast-enhanced CT scan taken on day 15 following admission revealed that the thrombus had disappeared, and echocardiography revealed improved right ventricular dysfunction. The patient was transferred to another hospital on day 64 for rehabilitation. We report the first case of pulmonary artery thrombosis that was successfully recanalized by endovascular treatment with a stent retriever. The stent retriever may be useful as an endovascular treatment device for PE because it is easier to achieve recanalization using this method compared to conventional treatment methods.