ObjectivesInfection of peripheral interposition grafts is a rare but devastating complication following aneurysm repair. Typically, graft infection necessitates explantation and, if possible, revascularization of the limb. However, treatment complexity varies substantially depending on the location and extent of infection. This case describes the management of a popliteal artery interposition graft infection.MethodsWe describe an 84 year old male with a history of left popliteal artery aneurysm repair with PTFE interposition graft (found on workup a year prior for a gangrenous great toe) who presented with four days of night sweats, chills, and a painful posterior left knee. Laboratory findings indicated leukocytosis, while ultrasound and CT imaging revealed complex fluid surrounding the graft without evidence of pseudo-aneurysm. Surgical management was conducted in two stages, the first with the patient supine for bypass from the superficial femoral artery to the posterior tibial artery using ipsilateral reversed great saphenous vein. The patient was then repositioned prone for the second stage of the procedure, and the infected popliteal fossa was entered posteriorly for debridement with caution to avoid injury to the tibial nerve and popliteal vein. The infected graft was removed, and antibiotic beads were placed in the infected region.ResultsFollowing this procedure and serial washouts one week later, the patient retained motor function, sensation, and palpable posterior tibial and dorsal pedal pulses. The patient was placed on IV cefazolin for 6 weeks following the procedure and discharged with 6 months of oral suppression to achieve long-term prevention of further infection.ConclusionsWhen managing popliteal artery graft infection, the presence of purulent material in the popliteal fossa can make anatomic bypasses high-risk for recurrent infection, and caution must be taken to avoid the nearby popliteal vein and tibial nerve during irrigation and debridement.

Vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) is a serious complication after aortic surgery. This study investigates VGEI and patient characteristics, PET/CT quantification before surgical or conservative management of VGEI and post-intervention outcomes in order to identify patients who might benefit from such a procedure. PET standard uptake values (SUV) were quantitatively assessed and compared to a non-VGEI cohort. The primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality and aortic reintervention-free survival at six months. Ninety-three patients (75% male, 65 ± 10 years, 82% operated) were included. The initial operation was mainly for aneurysm (67.7%: 31% EVAR, 12% TEVAR, 57% open aortic repair). Thirty-two patients presented with fistulae. PET SUVTLR (target-to-liver ratio) showed 94% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Replacement included silver-coated Dacron (21.3%), pericardium (61.3%) and femoral vein (17.3%), yet the material did not influence the overall survival (p = 0.745). In-hospital mortality did not differ between operative and conservative treatment (19.7% vs. 17.6%, p = 0.84). At six months, 50% of the operated cohort survived without aortic reintervention. Short- and midterm morbidity and mortality remained high after aortic graft removal. Neither preoperative characteristics nor the material used for reconstruction influenced the overall survival, and, with limitations, both the in-hospital and midterm survival were similar between the surgically and conservatively managed patients.

Diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection with [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) allows for early detection of functional changes associated with infection, based on increased glucose utilization by activated macrophages and granulocytes. Aseptic vascular grafts, like all foreign bodies, can stimulate an inflammatory response, which can present as increased activity on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Consequently, distinguishing aseptic inflammation from graft infection, though important, can be difficult. In the case of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), a minimally invasive procedure involving the transfemoral insertion of an endoprosthetic stent graft, the normal postoperative appearance of these grafts on 18F-FDG PET/CT can vary over time, potentially confounding study interpretation.

To investigate the visual, semiquantitative, and temporal characteristics of aseptic vascular grafts in patients status post EVAR.

In this observational retrospective cohort study, patients with history of EVAR who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for indications other than infection were identified retrospectively. All patients were asymptomatic for graft infection - no abdominal pain, fever of unknown origin, sepsis, or leukocytosis - at the time of imaging and for ≥ 2 mo after each PET/CT. Imaging studies such as CT for each patient were also reviewed, and any patients with suspected or confirmed vascular graft infection were excluded. One hundred two scans performed on 43 patients (34 males; 9 females; age = 77 ± 8 years at the time of the final PET/CT) were retrospectively reviewed. All 43 patients had an abdominal aortic (AA) vascular graft, 40 patients had a right iliac (RI) limb graft, and 41 patients had a left iliac (LI) limb graft. Twenty-two patients had 1 PET/CT and 21 patients had from 2 to 9 PET/CTs. Grafts were imaged between 2 mo to 168 mo (about 14 years) post placement. Eight grafts were imaged within 6 mo of placement, including three that were imaged within three months of placement. The mean interval between graft placement and PET/CT for all 102 scans was 51 ± 39 mo. PET/CT data was reconstructed with region-of-interest analysis of proximal, mid and distal portions of the grafts and background ascending aorta. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was recorded for each region. SUVmax-to-background uptake ratios (URs) were calculated. Visual assessment was performed using a 2-pattern grading scale: Diffuse (homogeneous uptake less than liver uptake) and focal (one or more areas of focal uptake in any part of the graft). Statistical analysis was performed.

In total, there were 306 AA grafts, 285 LI grafts, 282 RI grafts, and 306 ascending aorta background SUVmax measurements. For all 102 scans, mean SUVmax values for AA grafts were 2.8-3.0 along proximal, mid, and distal segments. Mean SUVmax values for LI grafts and RI grafts were 2.7-2.8. Mean SUVmax values for background were 2.5 ± 0.5. Mean URs were 1.1-1.2. Visual analysis of the scans reflected results of quantitative analysis. On visual inspection, 98% revealed diffuse, homogeneous 18F-FDG uptake less than liver. Graft URs and visual pattern categories were significantly associated for AA graft URs (F-ratio = 21.5, P < 0.001), LI graft URs (F-ratio = 20.4, P < 0.001), and RI graft URs (F-ratio = 30.4, P < 0.001). Thus, visual patterns of 18F-FDG uptake corresponded statistically significantly to semiquantitative URs. The age of grafts showing focal patterns was greater than grafts showing diffuse patterns, 87 ± 89 vs 50 ± 37 mo, respectively (P = 0.02). URs were significantly associated with graft age for AA grafts (r = 0.19, P = 0.001). URs were also significantly associated with graft age for LI grafts (r = 0.25, P < 0.0001), and RI grafts (r = 0.31, P < 0.001). Quartiles of similar numbers of graft (n = 25-27) grouped by graft age indicated that URs were significantly higher for 4th quartile vs 2nd quartile URs (F-ratio = 19.5, P < 0.001). When evaluating URs, graft SUVmax values within 10%-20% of the ascending aorta SUVmax is evident in aseptic grafts, except for grafts in the oldest quartiles. In this study, grafts in the oldest quartiles (> 7 years post EVAR) showed SUVmax up to 30% higher than the ascending aorta SUVmax.

Characteristics of an aseptic vascular stent graft in the aorta and iliac vessels on 18F-FDG PET/CT include graft SUVmax values within 10%-20% of the ascending aorta background SUVmax. The SUVmax of older aseptic grafts can be as much as 30% above background. The visual uptake pattern of diffuse, homogeneous uptake less than liver was seen in 98% of aseptic vascular grafts, making this pattern particularly reassuring for clinicians.