Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (7089)
All Articles published online
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
Aug 28, 2013 (publication date) through Nov 19, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Radiology
ISSN
1949-8470
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Butler RS, Chen C, Vashi R, Hooley RJ, Philpotts LE. 3.0 Tesla vs 1.5 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. World J Radiol 2013; 5(8): 285-294 [PMID: 24003354 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i8.285] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i8/285.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Heinrich F. Magometschnigg, Pascal A. Baltzer, Barbara Fueger, Thomas H. Helbich, Georgios Karanikas, Peter Dubsky, Margaretha Rudas, Michael Weber, Katja Pinker. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT compared with that of contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast at 3 T. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2015; 42(11): 1656 doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3099-1
|
| 2 |
Shinji Yamamoto, Yukinori Okada, Nobukiyo Yoshida, Koji Takeshita, Noriko Sakurai, Atsushi Ichikawa, Manabu Takimoto. An Investigation Into the Effect of Different Static Magnetic Fields of 1.5-T and 3.0-T MRI on the Measurement of Tumor Diameters in Breast Cancer. Cureus 2024; doi: 10.7759/cureus.52838
|
| 3 |
Adam Ofri, Katrina Moore. Occult breast cancer: Where are we at?. The Breast 2020; 54: 211 doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.10.012
|
| 4 |
Jing Luo, Daniel S. Hippe, Habib Rahbar, Sana Parsian, Mara H. Rendi, Savannah C. Partridge. Diffusion tensor imaging for characterizing tumor microstructure and improving diagnostic performance on breast MRI: a prospective observational study. Breast Cancer Research 2019; 21(1) doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1183-3
|
| 5 |
Sofia Brandão, Luísa Nogueira, Eduarda Matos, Rita Gouveia Nunes, Hugo Alexandre Ferreira, Joana Loureiro, Isabel Ramos. Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience. La radiologia medica 2015; 120(8): 705 doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0508-2
|
| 6 |
Matthias Dietzel, Evelyn Wenkel, Matthias Hammon, Paola Clauser, Michael Uder, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland, Pascal A.T. Baltzer. Does higher field strength translate into better diagnostic accuracy? A prospective comparison of breast MRI at 3 and 1.5 Tesla. European Journal of Radiology 2019; 114: 51 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.033
|
| 7 |
Khurram Shahzad, Wael Mati. Advances in Medical and Surgical Engineering. 2020; : 121 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-819712-7.00009-7
|