For: | Roethke MC, Kuru TH, Radbruch A, Hadaschik B, Schlemmer HP. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla: Is administration of hyoscine-N-butyl-bromide mandatory? World J Radiol 2013; 5(7): 259-263 [PMID: 23908696 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v5.i7.259] |
---|---|
URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v5/i7/259.htm |
Number | Citing Articles |
1 |
Yue Lin, Enis C. Yilmaz, Mason J. Belue, Baris Turkbey. Prostate MRI and image Quality: It is time to take stock. European Journal of Radiology 2023; 161: 110757 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110757
|
2 |
Anna Taylor, Simon Wilkins, Nicholas Gelber, Wei Chun Wang, Karen Oliva, Raymond Yap, Paul McMurrick, Pravin Ranchod. The effect of anti‐spasmodic administration on the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging staging of rectal cancer. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2023; 93(6): 1613 doi: 10.1111/ans.18252
|
3 |
Felix N. Harder, Kilian Weiss, Thomas Amiel, Johannes M. Peeters, Robert Tauber, Sebastian Ziegelmayer, Egon Burian, Marcus R. Makowski, Andreas P. Sauter, Jürgen E. Gschwend, Dimitrios C. Karampinos, Rickmer F. Braren. Prospectively Accelerated T2-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate by Combining Compressed SENSE and Deep Learning in Patients with Histologically Proven Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2022; 14(23): 5741 doi: 10.3390/cancers14235741
|
4 |
Cynthia Schmidt, Andreas M. Hötker, Urs J. Muehlematter, Irene A. Burger, Olivio F. Donati, Borna K. Barth. Value of bowel preparation techniques for prostate MRI: a preliminary study. Abdominal Radiology 2021; 46(8): 4002 doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03046-3
|
5 |
Paul Sathiadoss, Mohammad Haroon, Heba Osman, Faraz Ahmad, Philip Papadatos, Nicola Schieda. Comparison of 5 Rectal Preparation Strategies for Prostate MRI and Impact on Image Quality. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 2022; 73(2): 346 doi: 10.1177/08465371211033753
|
6 |
Fernando Morbeck Almeida Coelho, Ronaldo Hueb Baroni. Strategies for improving image quality in prostate MRI. Abdominal Radiology 2024; 49(12): 4556 doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04396-4
|
7 |
Carolin Reischauer, Timmy Cancelli, Sonaz Malekzadeh, Johannes M. Froehlich, Harriet C. Thoeny. How to improve image quality of DWI of the prostate—enema or catheter preparation?. European Radiology 2021; 31(9): 6708 doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07842-9
|
8 |
I. Caglic, T. Barrett. Optimising prostate mpMRI: prepare for success. Clinical Radiology 2019; 74(11): 831 doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2018.12.003
|
9 |
Samuel Borofsky, Shawn Haji-Momenian, Sheil Shah, Myles Taffel. Multiparametric MRI of the Prostate Gland: Technical Aspects. Future Oncology 2016; 12(21): 2445 doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0218
|
10 |
T. Ullrich, M. Quentin, A. K. Schmaltz, C. Arsov, C. Rubbert, D. Blondin, R. Rabenalt, P. Albers, G. Antoch, L. Schimmöller. Hyoscine butylbromide significantly decreases motion artefacts and allows better delineation of anatomic structures in mp-MRI of the prostate. European Radiology 2018; 28(1): 17 doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4940-7
|
11 |
Andrei S. Purysko, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz. Technique of Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate. Urologic Clinics of North America 2018; 45(3): 427 doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.03.008
|
12 |
Suman Prabhakar, Nicola Schieda. Patient preparation for prostate MRI: A scoping review. European Journal of Radiology 2023; 162: 110758 doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110758
|
13 |
Osamu Tanaka, Hisao Komeda, Masayoshi Tamaki, Kensaku Seike, Shota Fujimoto, Eiichi Yama, Shigeki Hirose, Masayuki Matsuo. Efficacy of butylscopolamine in obtaining clear MR image for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology 2017; : 19 doi: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2017.08.001
|
14 |
Lebina Shrestha Kakkar, Muhammad Usman, Simon Arridge, Alex Kirkham, David Atkinson. Characterization of B0-field fluctuations in prostate MRI. Physics in Medicine & Biology 2020; 65(21): 21NT01 doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/abbc7f
|
15 |
R.A. Slough, I. Caglic, N.L. Hansen, A.J. Patterson, T. Barrett. Effect of hyoscine butylbromide on prostate multiparametric MRI anatomical and functional image quality. Clinical Radiology 2018; 73(2): 216.e9 doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.013
|
16 |
Andrei S. Purysko, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz. Technique of Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2018; 56(2): 211 doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2017.10.004
|
17 |
Michael Meier-Schroers, Christian Marx, Frederic Carsten Schmeel, Karsten Wolter, Jürgen Gieseke, Wolfgang Block, Alois Martin Sprinkart, Frank Traeber, Winfried Willinek, Hans Heinz Schild, Guido Matthias Kukuk. Revised PROPELLER for T2-weighted imaging of the prostate at 3 Tesla: impact on lesion detection and PI-RADS classification. European Radiology 2018; 28(1): 24 doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4949-y
|
18 |
Olga Starobinets, Natalie Korn, Sonam Iqbal, Susan M. Noworolski, Ronald Zagoria, John Kurhanewicz, Antonio C. Westphalen. Practical aspects of prostate MRI: hardware and software considerations, protocols, and patient preparation. Abdominal Radiology 2016; 41(5): 817 doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0590-x
|
19 |
Alexandre Woernle, Cameron Englman, Louise Dickinson, Alex Kirkham, Shonit Punwani, Aiman Haider, Alex Freeman, Veeru Kasivisivanathan, Mark Emberton, John Hines, Caroline M. Moore, Clare Allen, Francesco Giganti. Picture Perfect: The Status of Image Quality in Prostate MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2024; 59(6): 1930 doi: 10.1002/jmri.29025
|
20 |
Karthik M. Sundaram, Jarrett Rosenberg, Ali B. Syed, Stephanie T. Chang, Andreas M. Loening. Assessment of T2-weighted Image Quality at Prostate MRI in Patients with and Those without Intramuscular Injection of Glucagon. Radiology: Imaging Cancer 2023; 5(3) doi: 10.1148/rycan.220070
|
21 |
Daniel L. Brennan, Smaro Lazarakis, Allan Lee, Teng H. Tan, Kwang Y. Chin, Sheng F. Oon. Do antispasmodics or rectal enemas improve image quality on multiparametric prostate MRI? An ‘Evidence-Based Practice’ review of the literature. Abdominal Radiology 2021; 46(6): 2770 doi: 10.1007/s00261-020-02916-6
|
22 |
Tobias Franiel, Patrick Asbach, Dirk Beyersdorff, Dirk Blondin, Sascha Kaufmann, Ullrich Gerd Mueller-Lisse, Michael Quentin, Stefan Rödel, Matthias Röthke, Heinz-Peter Schlemmer, Lars Schimmöller. mpMRI of the Prostate (MR-Prostatography): Updated Recommendations of the DRG and BDR on Patient Preparation and Scanning Protocol. RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren 2021; doi: 10.1055/a-1406-8477
|
23 |
Orpheus Kolokythas, Kathan Amin. Motion Correction in MR - Correction of Position, Motion, and Dynamic Field Changes. Advances in Magnetic Resonance Technology and Applications 2022; 6: 351 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-824460-9.00026-1
|