BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Kitajima K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Murakami K, Sugimura K. Comparison of DWI and PET/CT in evaluation of lymph node metastasis in uterine cancer. World J Radiol 2012; 4(5): 207-214 [PMID: 22761980 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v4.i5.207]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v4/i5/207.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
Yu Dong, Xiaoyun Wang, Yanan Wang, Yuan Liu, Jiawen Zhang, Wenyan Qian, Sufang Wu. Validity of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Pretreatment Evaluation of Patients With Cervical CarcinomaInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer 2014; 24(9) doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000287
2
Chiaki Hashimoto, Shogo Shigeta, Muneaki Shimada, Yusuke Shibuya, Masumi Ishibashi, Sakiko Kageyama, Tomomi Sato, Hideki Tokunaga, Kei Takase, Nobuo Yaegashi. Diagnostic Performance of Preoperative Imaging in Endometrial CancerCurrent Oncology 2023; 30(9) doi: 10.3390/curroncol30090597
3
Utpal Bhadra, Tanmoy Mondal, Indira Bag, Debasmita Mukhopadhyay, Paromita Das, Bibhuti B. Parida, Prathama S. Mainkar, Chada Raji Reddy, Manika Pal Bhadra. HDAC inhibitor misprocesses bantam oncomiRNA, but stimulates hid induced apoptotic pathwayScientific Reports 2015; 5(1) doi: 10.1038/srep14747
4
Ephraim Parent, Vanessa Sanders, Farrokh Dehdashti, Kathryn Fowler. PET/MRI in Oncology2018;  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68517-5_18
5
Abhishek Shinghal, Jhansi Pattanaik, Prashasti Sharma. Evidence Based Handbook on Diagnosis and Staging in Oncology2026;  doi: 10.1007/978-981-95-9701-7_26
6
Evelyn Dappa, Tania Elger, Annette Hasenburg, Christoph Düber, Marco J. Battista, Andreas M. Hötker. The value of advanced MRI techniques in the assessment of cervical cancer: a reviewInsights into Imaging 2017; 8(5) doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0567-0
7
Keiichiro Nakamura, Ikuo Joja, Takeshi Nagasaka, Tomoko Haruma, Yuji Hiramatsu. Maximum standardized lymph node uptake value could be an important predictor of recurrence and survival in patients with cervical cancerEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2014; 173 doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.030
8
Enora Laas, Caroline Malhaire, Élodie Gauroy, Virginie Fourchotte, Jean-Guillaume Feron, Léa Pauly, Noémie Girard, Thomas Gaillard, Fabrice Lécuru. Nouvelles recommandations des sociétés savantes européennes (ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020) pour le cancer de l’endomètre : implications pour le radiologueImagerie de la Femme 2023; 33(4) doi: 10.1016/j.femme.2023.04.006
9
Yun Mao, Sandeep Hedgire, Duangkamon Prapruttam, Mukesh Harisinghani. Imaging of Pelvic Lymph NodesCurrent Radiology Reports 2014; 2(11) doi: 10.1007/s40134-014-0070-z
10
Jianjiang Ruan, Yueqiao Zhang, Hong Ren. Meta-analysis of PET/CT detect lymph nodes metastases of cervical cancerOpen Medicine 2018; 13(1) doi: 10.1515/med-2018-0065
11
Minying Zhu, Qingchan Zhuo, Wenci Liu, Chengnong Guan, Yufang Zuo. Imaging evaluation of para-aortic lymph nodes in cervical cancerActa Radiologica 2023; 64(9) doi: 10.1177/02841851231179178
12
Dong Hoon Suh, Min A Kim, Hee Seung Kim, Hyun Hoon Chung, Noh Hyun Park, Yong Sang Song, Soon-Beom Kang. L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule Expression Is Associated With Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis and Advanced Stage in Diabetic Patients With Endometrial Cancer: A Matched Case Control StudyJournal of Cancer Prevention 2014; 19(3) doi: 10.15430/JCP.2014.19.3.231
13
YAKUN ZHANG, XUE MENG, HONGSHENG ZENG, YAN GUAN, QIONG ZHANG, SHEN GUO, XIUJIU LIU, QISEN GUO. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor-C levels: A possible diagnostic marker for lymph node metastasis in patients with primary non-small cell lung cancerOncology Letters 2013; 6(2) doi: 10.3892/ol.2013.1373
14
Federico Collettini, Bernd Hamm. MRI and CT of the Female PelvisMedical Radiology 2017;  doi: 10.1007/174_2017_54
15
Muriel Viala-Trentini, Claire Faget, Jean-Pierre Rouanet. Imagerie de diffusion dans le staging ganglionnaire des néoplasies gynécologiquesImagerie de la Femme 2014; 24(2) doi: 10.1016/j.femme.2014.03.001
16
Caroline Bouche, Manuel Gomes David, Julia Salleron, Philippe Rauch, Léa Leufflen, Julie Buhler, Frédéric Marchal. Evaluation of Pre-Therapeutic Assessment in Endometrial Cancer StagingDiagnostics 2020; 10(12) doi: 10.3390/diagnostics10121045
17
Keiichiro Nakamura, Ikuo Joja, Chikako Fukushima, Tomoko Haruma, Chiaki Hayashi, Tomoyuki Kusumoto, Noriko Seki, Atsushi Hongo, Yuji Hiramatsu. The preoperative SUVmax is superior to ADCmin of the primary tumour as a predictor of disease recurrence and survival in patients with endometrial cancerEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 2013; 40(1) doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2240-7
18
Teodoro Martín Noguerol, Rocío Sánchez Sánchez, José Pablo Martínez Barbero, Antonio Rodríguez Fernández, Antonio Luna. Functional Imaging in Oncology2014;  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-40582-2_29
19
Ferdinand Seith, Sergios Gatidis, Sotirios Bisdas, Christian la Fougère, Jürgen Schäfer, Konstantin Nikolaou, Nina Schwenzer. PET/MR in OncologyCurrent Radiology Reports 2015; 3(10) doi: 10.1007/s40134-015-0118-8
20
Xiang-chuang Kong, Ling-yun Xiong, Emre Gazyakan, Holger Engel, Ulrich Kneser, Andreas K. Nüssler, Christoph Hirche, Xiang-quan Kong. Diagnostic power of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the presence of lymph node metastasis: A meta-analysisJournal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology [Medical Sciences] 2017; 37(4) doi: 10.1007/s11596-017-1759-z
21
Dinesh Manoharan, Chandan J Das, Ankita Aggarwal, Arun K Gupta. Diffusion weighted imaging in gynecological malignancies - present and futureWorld Journal of Radiology 2016; 8(3): 288-297 doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i3.288
22
Evangelia V. Skoura, Ioannis E. Datseris. Imaging in Clinical Oncology2018;  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_44
23
Evangelia V. Skoura, Ioannis E. Datseris. Artificial Intelligence in PET/CT Oncologic Imaging2022;  doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-10090-1_7
24
Alexander B. Olawaiye, Charles A. Leath. Contemporary management of uterine clear cell carcinoma: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review and recommendationGynecologic Oncology 2019; 155(2) doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.031
25
Jennifer J. Mueller, Lawrence T. Dauer, Rajmohan Murali, Alexia Iasonos, Neeta Pandit-Taskar, Nadeem R. Abu-Rustum, Jan Grimm. Positron Lymphography via Intracervical 18F-FDG Injection for Presurgical Lymphatic Mapping in Cervical and Endometrial MalignanciesJournal of Nuclear Medicine 2020; 61(8) doi: 10.2967/jnumed.119.230714
26
Min Zhou, Bin Lu, Gang Lv, Qin Tang, Jibiao Zhu, Jun Li, Kaide Shi. Differential diagnosis between metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes using DW-MRI: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studiesJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 2015; 141(6) doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1895-9
27
Xue Yu, Elaine Yuen Phin Lee, Vincent Lai, Queenie Chan. Correlation between tissue metabolism and cellularity assessed by standardized uptake value and apparent diffusion coefficient in peritoneal metastasisJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2014; 40(1) doi: 10.1002/jmri.24361
28
Wei Fan Sui, Xiang Chen, Zhen Kun Peng, Jing Tao Wu. Applying Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Detect Metastatic and Non-Metastatic Lymph Nodes in Abdomen: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic ReviewApplied Magnetic Resonance 2016; 47(9) doi: 10.1007/s00723-016-0808-2
29
Silvana Faria, Catherine Devine, Chitra Viswanathan, Sanaz Javadi, Brinda Rao Korivi, Priya R. Bhosale. FDG-PET Assessment of Other Gynecologic CancersPET Clinics 2018; 13(2) doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.006
30
Qian Luo, Lan Luo, Liang Tang. A Network Meta-Analysis on the Diagnostic Value of Different Imaging Methods for Lymph Node Metastases in Patients With Cervical CancerTechnology in Cancer Research & Treatment 2018; 17 doi: 10.1177/1533034617742311
31
Sarthak Tripathy, Girish Kumar Parida, Rakesh Kumar. Quantitative Assessment of Gynecologic MalignanciesPET Clinics 2018; 13(2) doi: 10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.010
32
Andrea Gallamini, Colette Zwarthoed, Anna Borra. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in OncologyCancers 2014; 6(4) doi: 10.3390/cancers6041821
33
Sebastiano Barbieri, Kirsi H. Härmä, Harriet C. Thoeny. MRI and CT of the Female PelvisMedical Radiology 2017;  doi: 10.1007/174_2017_64
34
Alessandro Stecco, Francesco Buemi, Alessia Cassarà, Roberta Matheoud, Gian Mauro Sacchetti, Alberto Arnulfo, Marco Brambilla, Alessandro Carriero. Comparison of retrospective PET and MRI-DWI (PET/MRI-DWI) image fusion with PET/CT and MRI-DWI in detection of cervical and endometrial cancer lymph node metastasesLa radiologia medica 2016; 121(7) doi: 10.1007/s11547-016-0626-5
35
Shiro Ishii, Masayuki Miyajima, Hiroki Suenaga, Shigeyasu Sugawara, Ayaka Nemoto, Naoyuki Ukon, Takeyuki Nambu, Hitoshi Kubo, Noboru Oriuchi, Hiroshi Ito. Detectability of Malignant Lesions by Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Whole-Body Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance ImagingJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography 2019; 43(4) doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000882
36
Evangelia V. Skoura, Ioannis E. Datseris. Imaging in Clinical Oncology2014;  doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-5385-4_42
37
J Si, S Huang, H Shi, Z Liu, Q Hu, G Wang, G Shen, D Zhang. Usefulness of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI for discrimination of reactive and metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot studyDentomaxillofacial Radiology 2014; 43(3) doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130202
38
Deepali Raina, Rashmi Rekha Bora, Rama Joshi. Detection of Regional Lymph Node Metastasis by 18-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Endometrial CancerIndian Journal of Gynecologic Oncology 2019; 17(2) doi: 10.1007/s40944-019-0274-5
39
Chyong-Huey Lai, Gigin Lin, Tzu-Chen Yen, Feng-Yuan Liu. Molecular imaging in the management of gynecologic malignanciesGynecologic Oncology 2014; 135(1) doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.07.092