Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2026; 18(6): 117807
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.117807
Published online Jun 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.117807
Table 1 Summary about beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers
| Topic | Ref. | Beta-blockers | Calcium channel blockers |
| Mechanism of action | Arnold et al[2], 2023; Wernhart et al[3], 2023; Meyer et al[4], 2023; Matsumoto et al[5], 2023 | Reduce heart rate, myocardial oxygen demand, and blood pressure | Dihydropyridines cause vasodilation and BP reduction; non-dihydropyridines also reduce heart rate and have negative inotropic effects |
| Clinical use | Meyer et al[4], 2023; Matsumoto et al[5], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021 | Potential benefit in patients with concomitant CAD or AF | Non-dihydropyridines preferred for rate control in AF; dihydropyridines are mainly used for hypertension |
| Safety and adverse effects | Wernhart et al[3], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021 | Can worsen chronotropic incompetence and exercise intolerance, particularly in HFpEF without AF or CAD | Generally well tolerated; non-dihydropyridines may cause bradycardia and conduction disturbances |
| Efficacy in HFpEF | Meyer et al[4], 2023; Matsumoto et al[5], 2023; Wu et al[6], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021; Liu et al[8], 2014; Bavishi et al[9], 2015 | May modestly reduce cardiovascular mortality, but evidence certainty is low; inconsistent effects on all-cause mortality and HF hospitalization | Generally neutral or modestly protective for HF hospitalization and pump failure death, without increased mortality |
| Comparative outcomes | Arnold et al[2], 2023; Wernhart et al[3], 2023; Meyer et al[4], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021 | Benefits are more pronounced in HFpEF with CAD or AF; neutral or potentially harmful in patients without these comorbiditie | Non-dihydropyridines may be associated with lower HF hospitalization risk compared to beta-blockers, especially in HFpEF with AF |
| Strength of evidence | Joseph et al[1], 2019; Meyer et al[4], 2023; Wu et al[6], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021; Liu et al[8], 2014; Bavishi et al[9], 2015 | Meta-analyses, RCTs, and observational studies; results inconsistent | Mostly observational studies; limited RCT data |
| Clinical scenarios favoring use | Arnold et al[2], 2023; Meyer et al[4], 2023; Martin et al[7], 2021 | HFpEF with AF or CAD | Hypertension, AF (rate control), or intolerance to beta-blockers due to exercise limitation |
- Citation: Vidal-Perez R, Vazquez-Rodriguez JM. Letter to the Editor: Beta-blockers vs calcium channel blockers in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: An old question in need of new answers. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(6): 117807
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i6/117807.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.117807