Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Cardiol. Mar 26, 2026; 18(3): 116299
Published online Mar 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i3.116299
Published online Mar 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i3.116299
Table 1 Signal pathway and artifact risks
| Step | Function | Common artifact sources | Clinical example |
| Generation | The heart produces approximately 1 mV currents | Competing signals from the muscle | Myopotential artifacts mimicking atrial fibrillation |
| Detection | Electrodes capture surface signals | Sweat, hair, poor adhesion, movement | Wandering baseline or false ST elevation (baseline drift) |
| Transmission | Leads carry signals | Cable fracture, patient motion, EMI | Flatline due to broken lead; saw-tooth interference from cautery |
| Amplification and filtering | Boosts and cleans signals | Amplifies both signal and noise; filter distortion | QRS smoothed, or ST segments flattened, spurious ST shifts |
| Display and printing | Trace presented | All upstream noise is now visible | Artifact interpreted as ventricular tachycardia, acceleration or deceleration artifacts |
Table 2 Classification of electrocardiographic artifacts with examples
| Category | Source | ECG appearance | Clinical mimic | Solution |
| Patient-related | Tremor, shivering, respiration, movement | Irregular baseline, wandering drift | AF, flutter, VT, ST changes | Patient cooperation |
| Equipment-related | Loose electrodes, fractured cables, faulty machine | Baseline jumps, flatline, spikes | Asystole, VF | Change cables, better skin preparation, electrode contact |
| Environmental | Power-line hum, cautery, ventilators | Saw-tooth oscillations, rhythmic noise | Flutter, VT | Avoidance of equipment, notch filters |
| Device-related | Pacemaker, LVAD, neurostimulators, IVL | Sharp spikes, continuous noise | VF, tachycardia | Not always possible |
Table 3 Common clinical mimics of electrocardiographic artifacts
| Artifact source | ECG appearance | Clinical mimic | Recognition clues |
| Tremor (Parkinson’s, shivering) | Irregular baseline, absent P waves | Atrial fibrillation | P waves marching through; stable pulse |
| Electrocautery, ventilators | Saw-tooth baseline | Atrial flutter | Localized, no AV conduction ratio |
| Movement, loose cables | Wide irregular complexes | Ventricular tachycardia | Too fast; QRS visible through noise; stable patient |
| Loose electrode, EMI | Chaotic baseline | Ventricular fibrillation | Conscious patient; stable SpO2 |
| Respiration, poor skin contact | Wandering baseline, pseudo ST shift | Myocardial infarction | Inconsistent, resolves with repeat |
| Holter/wearable motion | Drop-outs, spikes | AV block, tachycardia | Correlate with activity; not reproducible |
- Citation: Mondal S, Raja DP, Muslim NA, Prabhu MA. Electrocardiographic artifacts in clinical practice: A logical approach to recognition and prevention. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(3): 116299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i3/116299.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v18.i3.116299
