Published online May 26, 2026. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i5.120519
Revised: April 1, 2026
Accepted: April 24, 2026
Published online: May 26, 2026
Processing time: 73 Days and 0 Hours
Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAHD) is a prevalent cardiovascular condition. Recent research has uncovered the significant role of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) in cardiovascular disorders, including atheroscle
To explore the clinical relevance, diagnostic utility, and molecular mechanisms of S1PR1 in CAHD.
The expression of S1PR1 was examined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Cytokines in serum were detected by flow cytometry using a twelve-cytokine detection kit. Receiver operating characteristic curves were employed to assess the diagnostic value of S1PR1, interleukin (IL)-1β, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in CAHD. The cell counting kit-8 assay was utilized to determine cell viability, and flow cytometry was used to detect cell apoptosis. Western blot analysis was conducted to detect the protein levels of S1PR1.
S1PR1 was highly expressed in CAHD, with significantly higher levels observed in the high Gensini score group (≥ 40) compared to the low score group (< 40). Compared with the healthy control group, the CAHD group exhibited significantly increased levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, no significant difference in IL-2 and IL-6 levels, and a significant decrease in the levels of other cytokines. Furthermore, a correlation was observed between S1PR1 and both IL-1β and TNF-α in CAHD. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the combined detection of S1PR1, IL-1β, and TNF-α exhibited superior diagnostic value for CAHD compared to individual tests. Additionally, in oxidized low-density lipoprotein-treated human umbilical vein endothelial cells, the expressions of S1PR1, IL-1β, and TNF-α were increased. However, knockdown of S1PR1 resulted in decreased expression of IL-1β and TNF-α, accompanied by enhanced cell viability and attenuated apoptosis.
S1PR1 could act as a new diagnostic and monitoring biomarker for CAHD. Knockdown of S1PR1 protected human umbilical vein endothelial cells from oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced injury, which is mediated through regulation of IL-1β and TNF-α expression.
Core Tip: In this study, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) is upregulated in coronary atherosclerotic heart disease and positively correlates with interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α. It serves as a promising diagnostic biomarker, and combined detection with inflammatory cytokines enhances diagnostic performance. S1PR1 knockdown alleviates oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced endothelial cell injury via modulating inflammatory responses, highlighting S1PR1 as a potential target for coronary atherosclerotic heart disease diagnosis and intervention.
- Citation: Chu FY, Yao MH, Gu LM, Cai H, Li YN, Chen X, Xu XX. S1PR1 knockdown protects endothelial cells from oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced injury via reducing interleukin-1β and tumor necrosis factor-α expression. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(5): 120519
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v18/i5/120519.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v18.i5.120519
Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAHD) results from myocardial ischemia secondary to coronary artery stenosis caused by lipid- and calcium-rich plaque deposition[1]. Despite rising incidence and mortality rates, early diagnosis and risk assessment remain critical for improving patient prognosis. Known risk factors include diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and genetic predisposition[2-4]; however, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying CAHD remain unclear.
Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR), a G protein-coupled receptor family member, comprises five subtypes (S1PR1-5) with distinct tissue distributions and functions[5]. S1PR1-3 are widely expressed in vivo, while S1PR4 is predo
Seventy-one patients diagnosed by coronary angiography at Nantong First People’s Hospital from January 2023 to January 2024 formed the CAHD group; 40 healthy (physical examination) individuals during the same period formed the control group. Based on the median Gensini score, 48 and 23 patients were in the low (< 40 points) and high (≥ 40 points) stenosis subgroups. Ethical approval for the study was granted by the hospital’s Medical Ethics Committee (approval No. 2024-KT228-01). The inclusion criteria were as follows: CAHD group: (1) Positive diagnosis via electrocardiogram, coronary angiography, and symptoms; (2) No other cardiovascular diseases; and (3) Informed consent. Control group: (1) No diabetes, hypertension, or hyperlipidemia; and (2) Normal biochemical tests. Exclusion criteria were as follows: Hepatic/renal insufficiency, other cardiovascular diseases, malignancies, infections, or immune disorders.
General data, including gender, age, blood pressure, and smoking/drinking history, were collected from both the CAHD and control groups. Fasting venous blood (5 mL) was drawn from all participants in the morning. After centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 8 minutes, routine biochemical parameters (fasting blood glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B, lipoprotein(a), alanine transaminase, g-glutamyl transferase, and uric acid) were measured using the Beckman AU5800 analyzer. The remaining serum was stored at -80 °C for subsequent quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR).
Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, United States) and cultured in RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco, Rockville, MD, United States) with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Rockville, MD, United States) at 37 °C with 5% CO2.
Total RNA was extracted from serum using a spin-column RNA extraction kit for blood (liquid samples) and reverse transcribed into cDNA. The reaction system included 5 × buffer (4 μL), deoxynucleoside triphosphate (2 μL), oligo-dT (1 μL), reverse transcriptase (reverse transcriptase, RNase inhibitor, 1 μL each), diethylpyrocarbonate water (1 μL), and total RNA (10 μL), incubated at 42 °C for 60 minutes and then 72 °C for 5 minutes. Products were stored at -20 °C. qRT-PCR primers for S1PR1 (5’-TGTCGGGTGTTGGTGGGTA-3’ upstream, 5’-CAATGCTAGACCTTTGGCTCAGT-3’ downstream) and β-actin (5’-TCAAGATCATTGCTCCTCCTGAG-3’ upstream, 5’-ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGACA-3’ downstream) were used with SYBR Green. The PCR system included Mix (10 μL), primers (1 μL each), diethylpyrocarbonate water (5 μL), and cDNA (2 μL), with the following cycling conditions: 95 °C for 5 minutes (pre-denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 15 seconds (denaturation), 60 °C (annealing), and 72 °C for 30 seconds (extension). Relative S1PR1 expression was calculated using the 2-△△Ct method.
Serum cytokines were detected using a twelve cytokines flow cytometry immunoassay kit purchased from Shenzhen Wellgrow Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). Fluorescence signals were acquired, and standard curves were used to calculate cytokine concentrations.
The cell counting kit-8 assay evaluated HUVEC viability. Cells (5 × 103/well) were seeded in 96-well plates, incubated overnight, and then exposed to 25 μg/mL ox-LDL for 24 hours. After adding 10 μL cell counting kit-8 solution and 2 hours incubation, the absorbance at 490 nm was measured using a microplate reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Experiments were repeated three times.
HUVEC apoptosis was assessed by flow cytometry using an Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, United States). Cells (2 × 105/well) were seeded in six-well plates, incubated overnight, and then exposed to 25 μg/mL ox-LDL for 24 hours. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline, cells were stained with 10 μL Annexin V-FITC and 5 μL propidium iodide, incubated at room temperature for 20 minutes, and analyzed by flow cytometry using FlowJo 7.6.
Negative controls and S1PR1 siRNA were synthesized by Guangzhou RiboBio Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). Cells (2 × 105/well) were transfected into six-well plates using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, United States). Transfection efficiency was assessed by qRT-PCR and western blotting after 24 hours.
Total protein was extracted from HUVECs using RIPA buffer with 1 mmol/L phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China). Protein concentrations were measured using the BCA assay (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, United States). Samples were mixed with loading buffer and electrophoresed on 10% SDS-PAGE (NCM Biotech, Suzhou, China), then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States). Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk (2 hours, room temperature), incubated with primary antibodies (β-actin 1:50000, S1PR1 1:10000; Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) overnight at 4 °C, and with secondary antibodies (2 hours, room temperature). After washing with Tris-buffered saline Tween, bands were detected using a chemiluminescence system (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States), with β-actin as the loading control. Experiments were repeated three times.
Data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 and GraphPad 5. Enumeration data are presented as frequencies (χ2 test). Measurement data were tested for normality: Normally distributed data (mean ± SD, t test); non-normally distributed data [median (interquartile range), Mann-Whitney U test]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves assessed the diagnostic value of S1PR1, IL-1β, and TNF-α for CAHD. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
According to general information analysis, there were no significant difference in gender, systolic blood pressure, dias
| Clinical data | CAHD (n = 71) | Control (n = 40) | χ2/t/U value | P value |
| Gender (male/female) | 49/22 | 33/7 | 2.411 | 0.121 |
| Age (years) | 67.31 ± 1.30 | 57.03 ± 1.40 | 5.09 | < 0.0001 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 134 (123, 147) | 128 (123, 136) | 1123 | 0.068 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 81 (74, 88) | 80 (74, 85.75) | 1325 | 0.561 |
| Smoking history | 35 (49.30) | 9 (22.5) | 7.678 | 0.006 |
| Drinking history | 36 (50.70) | 12 (30) | 4.469 | 0.035 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.75 ± 0.32 | 4.69 ± 0.17 | 2.364 | 0.020 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 5.07 (4.46,5.07) | 3.94 (3.16, 4.74) | 723.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.58 ± 0.09 | 1.53 ± 0.12 | 0.34 | 0.74 |
| High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.17 (0.98, 1.33) | 1.36 (1.2, 1.72) | 812.5 | 0.0002 |
| Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.90 ± 0.11 | 2.34 ± 0.11 | 3.43 | 0.0009 |
| Apolipoprotein A1 (g/L) | 1.18 ± 0.03 | 1.31 ± 0.04 | 2.53 | 0.013 |
| Apolipoprotein B (g/L) | 0.8 (0.66, 0.95) | 0.72 (0.63, 0.78) | 1037 | 0.012 |
| Lipoprotein(a) (mg/L) | 207 (110, 422) | 118 (64.5, 254) | 974 | 0.006 |
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 23 (15, 32) | 18.5 (15, 30.5) | 1249 | 0.29 |
| G-glutamyl transferase (U/L) | 26 (18, 39) | 21.5 (17, 35.25) | 1247 | 0.29 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 345.3 ± 10.11 | 312.0 ± 15.76 | 2.114 | 0.037 |
| Clinical data | Low score (n = 48) | High score (n = 23) | χ2/t/U value | P value |
| Gender (male/female) | 33/15 | 16/7 | 0.005 | 0.945 |
| Age (years) | 66.46 ± 1.64 | 69.03 ± 2.08 | 0.947 | 0.347 |
| Systolic pressure (mmHg) | 134 (123, 150) | 135 (124, 145) | 540.5 | 0.893 |
| Diastolic pressure (mmHg) | 83.5 (75, 88) | 77 (71, 86) | 425.0 | 0.120 |
| Smoking history | 20 (41.6) | 15 (65.22) | 3.450 | 0.063 |
| Drinking history | 23 (47.92) | 13 (56.52) | 0.461 | 0.497 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.51 ± 0.35 | 6.24 ± 0.68 | 1.050 | 0.298 |
| Cholesterol (mmol/L) | 4.72 ± 0.14 | 5.30 ± 0.24 | 2.29 | 0.028 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.53 ± 0.10 | 1.69 ± 0.17 | 0.89 | 0.380 |
| High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.26 (1.04, 1.45) | 1.16 (0.98, 1.31) | 446.0 | 0.195 |
| Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.88 ± 0.11 | 2.97 ± 0.14 | 0.49 | 0.630 |
| Apolipoprotein A1 (g/L) | 1.22 ± 0.05 | 1.16 ± 0.04 | 0.88 | 0.383 |
| Apolipoprotein B (g/L) | 0.84 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.712 |
| Lipoprotein(a) (mg/L) | 183 (100, 329) | 309 (147, 608) | 391 | 0.049 |
| Alanine transaminase (U/L) | 23.5 (16.25, 32) | 20 (13, 35) | 492 | 0.460 |
| G-glutamyl transferase (U/L) | 26 (18, 38.5) | 26 (17, 41) | 542.5 | 0.912 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 342.0 ± 11.98 | 352.2 ± 19.02 | 0.470 | 0.640 |
Serum S1PR1 expression in the CAHD and control groups was detected by qRT-PCR. Compared to the control group, S1PR1 level in the CAHD group was significantly increased (P < 0.001) (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the expression of S1PR1 in the low score group was markedly lower than in the high score group (P < 0.01) (Figure 1B).
The levels of 12 cytokines were detected by flow cytometry in the CAHD and control groups. Compared with the control group, the CAHD group exhibited significantly increased levels of IL-1β and TNF-α, whereas the levels of IL-4, IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, interferon (IFN)-α, and IFN-γ were significantly decreased. The levels of IL-2 and IL-6 were not significantly affected. These data are shown in Table 3.
| Cytokine (pg/mL) | CAHD (n = 71) | Control (n = 40) | U value | P value |
| IL-1β | 2.81 (0.60,4.68) | 0.77 (0.12,1.04) | 638.5 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-2 | 1.91 (0.68, 4.03) | 2.71 (1.63, 3.48) | 1137.0 | 0.08 |
| IL-4 | 2.87 (0.39, 5.24) | 7.89 (6.36, 9.71) | 428.0 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-5 | 0.86 (0.09, 1.68) | 5.28 (4.08, 6.51) | 209.0 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-6 | 16.78 (8.56, 24.09) | 12.69 (10.59, 15.46) | 1125.0 | 0.07 |
| IL-8 | 9.79 (5.31, 26.87) | 24.32 (16.59, 32.41) | 757.0 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-10 | 3.08 (1.8, 4.38) | 6.12 (5.09, 7.33) | 440.0 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-12 | 0.59 (0.08, 1.46) | 2.79 (1.33, 4.02) | 581.0 | < 0.0001 |
| IL-17 | 3.8 (1.76, 6.85) | 9.89 (8.0, 12.61) | 424.5 | < 0.0001 |
| TNF-α | 4.12 (3.23, 5.26) | 2.91 (2.47, 3.65) | 678.5 | < 0.0001 |
| Interferon-α | 0.3 (0.06, 0.89) | 2.09 (1.68, 3.10) | 383.0 | < 0.0001 |
| Interferon-γ | 3.16 (1.79, 5.48) | 10.23 (9.61, 12.78) | 190.0 | < 0.0001 |
The correlation between S1PR1 and 12 cytokines was analyzed in the CAHD group. The results indicated a positive correlation between S1PR1 and IL-1β as well as TNF-α in the CAHD group (P < 0.05), while there was no significant correlation between S1PR1 and IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-α, or IFN-γ (Figure 2).
Based on ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of serum S1PR1, IL-1β, and TNF-α, and their combination in diagnosing CAHD were all higher than those of each individual marker. This indicated that the combination of these three markers could improve the diagnostic efficacy of CAHD (Figure 3 and Table 4).
| Area under the curve | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | AC (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
| S1PR1 | 0.779 | 73.2 | 75 | 73.87 | 73.24 | 75 |
| IL-1β | 0.775 | 66.2 | 80 | 71.17 | 66.20 | 80 |
| TNF-α | 0.761 | 74.6 | 70 | 72.97 | 74.65 | 70 |
| S1PR1 + IL-1β + TNF-α | 0.892 | 84.5 | 80 | 82.88 | 84.51 | 80 |
HUVECs were exposed to ox-LDL at concentrations of 0, 10, 25, and 50 μg/mL for 24 hours. To assess the temporal effects, HUVECs were treated with 25 μg/mL ox-LDL for 0, 12, 24, and 48 hours. ox-LDL stimulation downregulated the viability of HUVECs in a dose- and time-dependent manner, while the apoptosis rate was upregulated (Figure 4A-D). After treating HUVECs with ox-LDL, expression of S1PR1 also increased in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figure 4E-H). We chose HUVECs treated with 25 μg/mL ox-LDL for 24 hours for subsequent experiments.
IL-1β and TNF-α released by HUVECs treated with 25 μg/mL ox-LDL for 24 hours were assessed by flow cytometry. Compared to the control group, expression of IL-1β and TNF-α released by HUVECs treated with ox-LDL increased (Figure 5).
To explore the role of S1PR1 in modulating CAHD events, siRNA specifically designed to target S1PR1 was used in a loss-of-function assay. The knockdown efficacy of this siRNA was initially verified in HUVECs through qRT-PCR and Western blotting. The introduction of S1PR1 siRNA restored the elevated expression of S1PR1 in ox-LDL-induced HUVECs (Figure 6A and B). Inhibition of cell viability and promotion of apoptosis were also attenuated (Figure 6C and D). Our observations revealed that administration of S1PR1 siRNA reversed the ox-LDL-induced upregulated expression of IL-1β and TNF-α (Figure 6E and F). This implied that knockdown of S1PR1 in HUVECs conferred protection against ox-LDL-induced injury by regulating expression of IL-1β and TNF-α.
CAHD is characterized by lipid deposition in the coronary artery, which gradually forms plaques, resulting in stenosis of the vascular lumen and poor blood flow. CAHD can seriously damage heart function, and increase the risk of myocardial ischemia, angina pectoris, and even myocardial infarction. Patients may experience a series of symptoms such as chest pain, difficulty breathing, and palpitations; all of which can be life-threatening[11]. Therefore, early diagnosis and timely treatment are crucial for preventing the occurrence of adverse cardiac events.
S1PR1 is a key member of the G protein-coupled receptor family and one of the most extensively studied subtypes of the S1PR family. It regulates a variety of biological processes, including cell proliferation, migration, survival, and inflammatory responses, through binding to its endogenous ligand, S1P. S1PR1 exhibits highly selective expression among different tissues, predominantly in immune cells, vascular endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells[12-14]. Activation of its signaling pathway depends on the concentration gradient of S1P and the dynamic balance among receptor subtypes[15]. S1PR1 forms ligand-dependent complexes with scavenger receptor type B1 in cultured primary macrophages and mouse atherosclerotic plaques, jointly mediating HDL signaling and exerting antiatherosclerotic effects[16]. In contrast, studies utilizing immunostaining and radioligand methods have revealed upregulated expression of S1PR1 in human and mouse atherosclerotic plaques[17]. Notably, the expression of S1PR1 in atherosclerotic plaques exhibits cell type specificity: In vascular smooth muscle cells, S1PR1 activation promotes neointimal hyperplasia[9], whereas in macro
CAHD is a complex, multifactorial disorder with an incompletely elucidated pathogenesis, whose risk factors include diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking and family history. Beyond lipid metabolism disorders, inflammatory responses play a pivotal role in its development: Proinflammatory factors such as C-reactive protein, IL and TNF are closely associated with the formation, rupture of coronary atherosclerotic plaques and coronary artery spasm, and they drive atherosclerotic initiation and progression by mediating endothelial dysfunction, vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration, and foam cell formation[19-21]. Our study found that levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-1β and TNF-α were significantly elevated in patients with CAHD and positively correlated with S1PR1 expression, while levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines (such as IL-10) and Th1/Th2-related cytokines (such as IL-4 and IL-5) decreased. These findings suggest that S1PR1 is involved in the progression of CAHD by regulating the imbalance of the inflammatory microenvironment. Additionally, an ox-LDL-induced HUVECs model confirmed that upregulation of S1PR1 was closely associated with increased release of IL-1β and TNF-α, and knockdown of S1PR1 reversed this effect, suggesting that S1PR1 mediates endothelial damage by directly regulating the secretion of inflammatory cytokines. ROC curve analysis revealed that the combination of S1PR1, IL-1β, and TNF-α significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency of CAHD, supporting the potential of multimarker combined detection in clinical early screening.
The current study had some limitations. First, the sample size was small, and a larger cohort is needed to validate the generalizability of the biomarkers. Second, the specific molecular mechanisms by which S1PR1 regulates inflammatory cytokines were not fully elucidated. Third, animal models are lacking to verify the in vivo efficacy of S1PR1 inhibitors.
In summary, S1PR1 may play a central role in CAHD through the inflammation-endothelial damage-plaque instability axis, and targeted inhibition of S1PR1 could emerge as a novel strategy to alleviate progression of atherosclerosis. Future research should integrate single-cell sequencing technology to dissect the dynamic regulatory network of S1PR1 in specific cellular subpopulations (such as macrophage subtypes) and explore its interaction with metabolic repro
S1PR1 is a potential diagnostic/monitoring biomarker for CAHD, notably in high Gensini score patients, correlating with IL-1β and TNF-α. S1PR1 knockdown protects endothelial cells from ox-LDL injury, likely via cytokine regulation.
We sincerely thank all members of the research team for their dedicated efforts, professional support and contributions, as well as colleagues who participated in related experiments and data analysis, for their assistance in the successful completion of this study.
| 1. | Faroux L, Guimaraes L, Wintzer-Wehekind J, Junquera L, Ferreira-Neto AN, Del Val D, Muntané-Carol G, Mohammadi S, Paradis JM, Rodés-Cabau J. Coronary Artery Disease and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:362-372. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 269] [Cited by in RCA: 238] [Article Influence: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 2. | Khawaja T, Linge J, Leinhard OD, Al-Kindi SG, Rajagopalan S, Khera A, de Lemos JA, Joshi P, Neeland IJ. Coronary artery calcium, hepatic steatosis, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from the Dallas heart study. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2023;78:67-73. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in RCA: 14] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 3. | Li J, Dong Z, Wu H, Liu Y, Chen Y, Li S, Zhang Y, Qi X, Wei L. The triglyceride-glucose index is associated with atherosclerosis in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, regardless of diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidaemia. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023;22:224. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in RCA: 61] [Article Influence: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 4. | Volpe M, Gallo G. Hypertension, coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemic syndromes. Vascul Pharmacol. 2023;153:107230. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in RCA: 26] [Article Influence: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 5. | Lu S, She M, Zeng Q, Yi G, Zhang J. Sphingosine 1-phosphate and its receptors in ischemia. Clin Chim Acta. 2021;521:25-33. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 10] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 6. | Li J, Huang Y, Zhang Y, Liu P, Liu M, Zhang M, Wu R. S1P/S1PR signaling pathway advancements in autoimmune diseases. Biomol Biomed. 2023;23:922-935. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 7. | Ahmed N, Linardi D, Decimo I, Mehboob R, Gebrie MA, Innamorati G, Luciani GB, Faggian G, Rungatscher A. Characterization and Expression of Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptors in Human and Rat Heart. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:312. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in RCA: 29] [Article Influence: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 8. | Keul P, Polzin A, Kaiser K, Gräler M, Dannenberg L, Daum G, Heusch G, Levkau B. Potent anti-inflammatory properties of HDL in vascular smooth muscle cells mediated by HDL-S1P and their impairment in coronary artery disease due to lower HDL-S1P: a new aspect of HDL dysfunction and its therapy. FASEB J. 2019;33:1482-1495. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in RCA: 50] [Article Influence: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 9. | Kitano T, Usui S, Takashima SI, Inoue O, Goten C, Nomura A, Yoshioka K, Okajima M, Kaneko S, Takuwa Y, Takamura M. Sphigosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 promotes neointimal hyperplasia in a mouse model of carotid artery injury. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;511:179-184. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in RCA: 13] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 10. | Wang H, Huang H, Ding SF. Sphingosine-1-phosphate promotes the proliferation and attenuates apoptosis of Endothelial progenitor cells via S1PR1/S1PR3/PI3K/Akt pathway. Cell Biol Int. 2018;42:1492-1502. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in RCA: 71] [Article Influence: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 11. | Trigka M, Dritsas E. Long-Term Coronary Artery Disease Risk Prediction with Machine Learning Models. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23:1193. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 12. | Jozefczuk E, Guzik TJ, Siedlinski M. Significance of sphingosine-1-phosphate in cardiovascular physiology and pathology. Pharmacol Res. 2020;156:104793. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 44] [Cited by in RCA: 166] [Article Influence: 27.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 13. | Kim D, Tian W, Wu TT, Xiang M, Vinh R, Chang JL, Gu S, Lee S, Zhu Y, Guan T, Schneider EC, Bao E, Dixon JB, Kao P, Pan J, Rockson SG, Jiang X, Nicolls MR. Abnormal Lymphatic Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Signaling Aggravates Lymphatic Dysfunction and Tissue Inflammation. Circulation. 2023;148:1231-1249. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in RCA: 18] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 14. | Pu X, Cao X, Liu H, Huang W, Zhang L, Jiang T. Isorhamnetin attenuates the proliferation, invasion, migration and fibrosis of keloid fibroblasts by targeting S1PR1. Exp Ther Med. 2023;26:310. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 15. | O'Sullivan C, Dev KK. The structure and function of the S1P1 receptor. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34:401-412. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 79] [Cited by in RCA: 112] [Article Influence: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 16. | Bassila C, Kluck GEG, Thyagarajan N, Chathely KM, Gonzalez L, Trigatti BL. Ligand-dependent interactions between SR-B1 and S1PR1 in macrophages and atherosclerotic plaques. J Lipid Res. 2024;65:100541. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 17. | Liu H, Jin H, Han J, Yue X, Yang H, Zayed MA, Gropler RJ, Tu Z. Upregulated Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Receptor 1 Expression in Human and Murine Atherosclerotic Plaques. Mol Imaging Biol. 2018;20:448-456. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in RCA: 21] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 18. | Potì F, Scalera E, Feuerborn R, Fischer J, Arndt L, Varga G, Pardali E, Seidl MD, Fobker M, Liebisch G, Hesse B, Lukasz AH, Rossaint J, Kehrel BE, Rosenbauer F, Renné T, Christoffersen C, Simoni M, Burkhardt R, Nofer JR. Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1signaling in macrophages reduces atherosclerosis in LDL receptor-deficient mice. JCI Insight. 2024;9:e158127. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 19. | Tyrrell DJ, Goldstein DR. Ageing and atherosclerosis: vascular intrinsic and extrinsic factors and potential role of IL-6. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18:58-68. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in Crossref: 371] [Cited by in RCA: 307] [Article Influence: 61.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
| 20. | Fransén K, Pettersson C, Hurtig-Wennlöf A. CRP levels are significantly associated with CRP genotype and estrogen use in The Lifestyle, Biomarker and Atherosclerosis (LBA) study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22:170. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Full Text (PDF)] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
| 21. | Zhao Y, Shao C, Zhou H, Yu L, Bao Y, Mao Q, Yang J, Wan H. Salvianolic acid B inhibits atherosclerosis and TNF-α-induced inflammation by regulating NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway. Phytomedicine. 2023;119:155002. [RCA] [PubMed] [DOI] [Full Text] [Cited by in RCA: 91] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |