Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Cardiol. Sep 26, 2025; 17(9): 111044
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.111044
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.111044
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart outlining the literature screening process, study selection, and exclusion criteria.
Figure 2 Forest plots comparing outcomes between fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in multivessel coronary artery disease patients.
A: All-cause mortality; B: Major adverse cardiac event; C: Myocardial infarction; D: Revascularization; E: Stroke.
- Citation: Kataveni S, Ellahi E, Zafar F, Veettil INK, Iqbal A, Dhir B, Sabarish S, Erambalur S, Yathindra MR, Kvn M, Nawaz S, Dudekula SK, Haq UU, Hussain A, Khawar MM. Fractional flow reserve guided percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(9): 111044
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v17/i9/111044.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v17.i9.111044