Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Cardiol. Jun 26, 2024; 16(6): 310-313
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.310
Published online Jun 26, 2024. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v16.i6.310
Ultrasound based estimate of central venous pressure: Are we any closer?
Atit A Gawalkar, Department of Cardiology, Fortis Hospital, Himachal Pradesh, Kangra 176001, India
Akash Batta, Department of Cardiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Punjab, Ludhiana 141001, India
Author contributions: Batta A contributed to the conception and design, approved the manuscript, and took overall responsibility; Batta A and Gawalkar AA wrote and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved of the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Akash Batta, MD, Assistant Professor, Senior Scientist, Department of Cardiology, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Tagore Nagar, Civil Lines, Punjab, Ludhiana 141001, India. akashbatta02@gmail.com
Received: February 11, 2024
Revised: May 1, 2024
Accepted: May 22, 2024
Published online: June 26, 2024
Processing time: 134 Days and 20.3 Hours
Revised: May 1, 2024
Accepted: May 22, 2024
Published online: June 26, 2024
Processing time: 134 Days and 20.3 Hours
Core Tip
Core Tip: Central venous pressure (CVP) serves as a direct approximation of right atrial pressure and is influenced by factors like total blood volume, venous compliance, cardiac output, and orthostasis. Normal CVP falls within 8-12 mmHg but varies with volume status and venous compliance. Monitoring and managing disturbances in CVP are vital in patients with circulatory shock or fluid disturbances. Despite significant advancements in non-invasive CVP measurement, a reliable tool is yet to be found. Present methods can offer reasonable guidance in assessing CVP, provided their limitations are acknowledged.