Published online Aug 26, 2021. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v13.i8.361
Peer-review started: March 21, 2021
First decision: May 5, 2021
Revised: May 26, 2021
Accepted: July 16, 2021
Article in press: July 16, 2021
Published online: August 26, 2021
Processing time: 154 Days and 22.5 Hours
Routine coronary revascularisation pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was not associated with improved outcomes, yet, coronary angiogram (CA) is still performed as part of TAVI work up.
The lack of data showing consistent benefits in pre-TAVI revascularisation challenges the need for routine invasive coronary angiogram before TAVI procedure.
To assess whether a selective approach to perform pre-TAVI CA is safe and feasible.
Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients undergoing TAVI who underwent CA vs those who did not was performed. Decision to undergo CA pre-TAVI was tailored to patients clinical characteristics.
The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infraction, repeat CA, and re-admission with heart failure was comparable between the two groups.
Selective CA is a feasible and safe approach. The clinical value of routine CA should be challenged in future randomised trials.
Future randomised clinical trials are required to test whether selective CA is safe.